Slashdot Mirror


OpenOffice.org To Be Given Back To the Community

An anonymous reader writes "Oracle has stated they will give back the OpenOffice.org productivity suite to the community. Edward Screven, Oracle's Chief Corporate Architect, said the company intends upon 'working immediately with community members to further the continued success of Open Office.' Because there was a 'breadth of interest in free personal productivity applications,' the company believes the OpenOffice.org project would be 'best managed by an organization focused on serving that broad constituency on a non-commercial basis.'"

219 comments

  1. Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by mmell · · Score: 4, Funny
    Can't make money off it? It isn't competing with something we already offer? Get rid of it!

    Oh, and could somebody ban "slashushi"? Some troll out there is generating slashdot ID's just to post pictures of himself.

  2. Read between the lines by broknstrngz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It actually says: the code is a mess and we don't have any customers that would even remotely consider using it. So there, have it back and get off our lawn.

    1. Re:Read between the lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It actually says: the code is a mess and we don't have any customers that would even remotely consider *PURCHASING* it. So there, have it back and get off our lawn.

      FTFY.

    2. Re:Read between the lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More truth here than will ever be known.

    3. Re:Read between the lines by broknstrngz · · Score: 1

      That's what I actually meant :)

    4. Re:Read between the lines by jd · · Score: 4, Informative

      I suspect it's more a "what do we do with a brand name with a collapsing value and no product?"

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    5. Re:Read between the lines by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Brand name? "OpenOffice, the thing that was tainted by Oracle."

    6. Re:Read between the lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's more "if at least we can get some people to use it, then we can get more people to see the Oracle logo when they start their officesuite".

      Oracle can go die in a ditch for all I care.

    7. Re:Read between the lines by jd · · Score: 1

      Hey, dying in ditches spreads disease! Please change to "falls into an active volcano", at least for environmental reasons.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  3. Re:Forsks work aren't they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    link to js that takes over your browser

  4. Re:Forsks work aren't they by ae1294 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Its really is time to fork Gnome
    Join the effor!

    Could not someone at slashdot write a small script to blacklist url's that have been flagged troll? I'll do it if you pay me a slave wage...

  5. Outcry by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

    Too much outcry from the community? Wasn't worth it after LibreOffice? (despite the stupid name?)

    1. Re:Outcry by Luyseyal · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Heh, no kidding. Every time I see it in dselect (shut up, I'm old), I think "What's lib reoffice, oh wait, that's libre office".

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    2. Re:Outcry by Anon-Admin · · Score: 1

      I know the feeling, every time I see Libre I think of Nica Libre Cigars. Not a great cigar but enjoyable. Guess I am older than you lol

    3. Re:Outcry by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      You do realize that now that you've shown it, everyone who has read this comment is going to read it that way? You've just scarred many /. readers for life!

    4. Re:Outcry by Americano · · Score: 1

      I think more like, "We're not going to make any money off this, so why bother keeping it? Let the kids have their toys."

    5. Re:Outcry by PoprocksCk · · Score: 1

      Heh, same here. I thought I was the only one. I thought it was just some new library that was suddenly needed for a whole bunch of applications, hence its popularity.

    6. Re:Outcry by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I always think of Lucha Libre myself, which is probably worse...

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  6. IT'S A TRAP!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Anyone who would actually use an Oracle product in the workplace should have their head examined.

    I've never seen a company with such a lawsuit happy hostility for everyone other than themselves.

    Stay away from Oracle and Java if you don't want to get sued.

    1. Re:IT'S A TRAP!! by Gerzel · · Score: 1

      The people actually using those products often are not the people choosing those products for use.

  7. Re:Phew. by ae1294 · · Score: 2, Funny

    That is all.

    No that is not all.... IT'S A TRAP!!!!

  8. LibreJava by GeneralSecretary · · Score: 2

    Cool, let's try this with Java. LibreJava anyone?

    1. Re:LibreJava by alostpacket · · Score: 1

      I Libre'd out Loud...

      errr....

      --
      PocketPermissions Android Permission Guide
    2. Re:LibreJava by aBaldrich · · Score: 1

      The cacophony wouldn't have been so bad if they had used the Latin stem, LiberOffice, etc.

      --
      In soviet russia the government regulates the companies.
    3. Re:LibreJava by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Google is already working on that one, sort of... :)

    4. Re:LibreJava by medv4380 · · Score: 2

      Don't forget Red Hat and their Tea

    5. Re:LibreJava by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not instead just let that script kiddie crap die? Then there will be less crapping programmers in the world who think they are 'leet because they can code-by-number.

    6. Re:LibreJava by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1
  9. BAN: "slashboot (2042376)". Troll by mmell · · Score: 2

    Posting your picture online again?

  10. Re:Forks work, aren't they? by ae1294 · · Score: 0

    Its really is time to fork Gnome Join the effor!

    Once again could not someone at slashdot write a small script to blacklist url's that have been flagged troll? I'll do it if you pay me a slave wage...

  11. Duh by fragfoo · · Score: 1

    Too late for that.

    --
    Sig? Heil
  12. Free Office by Arthus · · Score: 1

    Open Office is amazing. Does everything I need it to minus speech tools. Me likey freeness.

    --
    Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle. ~ Plato
    1. Re:Free Office by hedwards · · Score: 1

      You should try Libreoffice then, they forked it just after Oracle took over Sun, and merged it with the interoperability patches that Go-oo.org had been using.

    2. Re:Free Office by Arthus · · Score: 1

      Duly noted. Domo arigato gozaimasu.

      --
      Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle. ~ Plato
  13. Re:Forsks work aren't they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could not someone at slashdot write a small script to blacklist url's that have been flagged troll? I'll do it if you pay me a slave wage...

    Could? Sure. Should? Every GNAA post would be linking to the BBC or Google or Slashdot itself just to get them blacklisted. Some sort of manually put together blacklist would be feasible for sites that do actual damage (but not for crap like Goatse - everyone on the planet must be bored of it by now but it's hardly going to hurt you)

  14. Re:Forks work, aren't they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its is really time to fork Gnome!. Join the effor!

    fuck you.

  15. Re:Forks work, aren't they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to go to bed, kiddo.

  16. Re:Forks work, aren't they by MBGMorden · · Score: 1, Informative

    Goatse warning.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  17. Too late Oracle Bye Bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have already uninstalled and deployed LibreOffice across our 500 client org.

    I will not keep bouncing about.

    We now fully back LibreOffice and will continue to do so. We will not backtrack back to OO until the next time Oracle change their mind.

    Bye Bye Oracle.

    1. Re:Too late Oracle Bye Bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every anonymous tool who writes about LibreOffice claims to be some sort tech visionary who will migrate his entire office to whatever programs suit his political views. Rather ironic considering that you "will not keep bouncing about."

      Care to back up your statements and statistics, or are you just a fan of LibreOffice bullshitting in order to make a point?

  18. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by ArhcAngel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I suspect the mass brain drain of former Sun employees has a lot to do with it as well. It's hard to support your customers if everybody who knows how to support it has left the building. This just might be an olive branch to keep some of the talent from flying the coop long enough to get new blood up to speed.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  19. LPOD not entirely Evil! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They could have done much worse. Letting it go is a noble act that we should celebrate

    1. Re:LPOD not entirely Evil! by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Given the number of companies that take the stance "This is ours, and better it completely disappear than anyone use it without paying us.", this is a good gesture on their part.

  20. The OpenOffice name/brand by Bloodwine77 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does it mean we can rename LibreOffice to OpenOffice now? Or are the two forks going to continue separate lines of development?

    1. Re:The OpenOffice name/brand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah; are they going to donate the OpenOffice.org trademark to the Document Foundation so it can rename (and merge any code that OOo might have written, although I'm of the impression that literally all development of note has taken place on LibreOffice since the fork)?

    2. Re:The OpenOffice name/brand by Haedrian · · Score: 0

      Actually given that the name is

      "OpenOffice.org" ... I think I prefer LibreOffice...

    3. Re:The OpenOffice name/brand by Mikkeles · · Score: 2

      Well, I think it should be called "SweetOffice"!

      (because it's an office suite; get it!
        er, never mind, I'll go away now)

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
  21. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess it's over, call it a day
    Sorry that it had to end this way
    No reason to pretend
    We knew it had to end someday
    This way

    Guess it's over, the kids are gone
    What's the use of trying to hang on
    Somewhere we lost the key
    So little left for you and me
    And it's clear to see

    Too much, too little, too late to lie again with you
    Too much, too little, too late to try again with you
    We're in the middle of ending something that we knew
    Was over {Oh, it was over}

    Too much, too little, too late to ever try again
    Too much, too little, too late, let's end at being friends
    Too much, too little, too late, we knew it had to end
    And it's over

  22. RE:Goatse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    but not for crap like Goatse - everyone on the planet must be bored of it by now but it's hardly going to hurt you

    Are you sure about that? Some people may have been scarred for life.

  23. give it away, give it away now. by Roskolnikov · · Score: 1

    This is how Oracle supports open source? we don't/won't pay to support it so we 'give' it back to the community.

    Given the options this is the lessor of two evils, they could have let it die internally.

    --
    Unix, an obscure operating system developed by bored researchers in an attempt to get a better game playing experience.
    1. Re:give it away, give it away now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just lets them paint a pretty pink rose on the stink of their unwillingness to join the community.

      I'll take it. Let them be and make Open/Libre Office kick butt!

  24. hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Libreoffice is really starting to get a foothold and a large protion of developers have fled to little to late oracle!

  25. let me translte for ya by poetmatt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, more like "wah! guys! please come back! we promise we won't spite the community!"

    This doesn't mean shit unless they change the bylaws which give oracle complete control over openoffice with the ability to nullify the community basically.

    1. Re:let me translte for ya by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      also, yes, this is a different product listed, but the same scenario.

    2. Re:let me translte for ya by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why would they need "the community" when most of the actual paid developers are still at Oracle. The people who left were mostly auxiliary people who were easily replaceable.

    3. Re:let me translte for ya by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If what you say is true. Then why is LibreOffice already so much better than OpenOffice ever was?

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    4. Re:let me translte for ya by geminidomino · · Score: 0

      "With a name like Smuckers^WLibreOffice, it has to be good?"

    5. Re:let me translte for ya by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      That would ignore the fact that most of the critical code has already been written, and LibreOffice was getting it for free. Add in the fact that all of the distros are tossing out OOo, and it was just a matter of time until OOo would be a dead project.

      Maybe Oracle realized that if they keep the community engaged, there may be rewards to be developed. Maybe they could even hold out hope for a Firefox like surge by the open source project, but if it happened while they were at odds with the outside community, they wouldn't reap any real benefits from that. Unfortunately, the non-Microsoft office suites don't seem to be making progress in the market, which is a real shame.

    6. Re:let me translte for ya by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 2

      Yes, it's quite easy to make it the case that one's official line is mostly developed by one's own employees if one choses to incorporate one's own employees' contributions over outsiders' contributions. This is precisely why the Go-OO/LibreOffice fork formed and is precisely why when Oracle changed its rules to be even more restrictive than Sun was there was enough of a push that people wanted LibreOffice to be the official fork.

      In short, trying to deny "the community" as an important part of OpenOffice's future really does miss the big picture under some bizarre idea that OpenOffice is closed source and Oracle has full say on the future of the code base. The trademark may die. The brand may die. But, that doesn't mean the program won't live on if Oracle doesn't want to be a part of it.

      The real question is for Oracle's future in the long term. Who wants to buy products from a company who is so willing to let a trademark and a brand die just because it's not readily profitable? It's the Oracle brand that keeps people coming back to pay them money, even more than their products themselves. That is, they've developed a reputation which is why people haven't simply switched to a free alternative to most their products. Even if most of those free alternatives were a failure to deliver, Oracle would be crippled if enough people left them for a few years. Now perhaps killing an office suite brand doesn't matter to people because Oracle does databases, but Oracle's future might not be databases. Consider how Microsoft being so stuck on the Windows brand instead of the more general concept of developing and maintaining the Microsoft brand and sub-brands is hurting them (Windows Phone, Windows Tablet, and Microsoft Zune).

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    7. Re:let me translte for ya by mbkennel · · Score: 1

      Why would they need "the community" when most of the actual paid developers are still at Oracle. The people who left were mostly auxiliary people who were easily replaceable.

      "Why would they need "the community" when most of the actual paid developers are still at Oracle. The people who left were mostly auxiliary people who were easily replaceable."

      Because they're about to fire all the actual paid developers at Oracle. The only thing that Larry hates more than not having totalitarian asshole control is paying money and not having totalitarian asshole control.

      And, realistically, Libre/OpenOffice will then suck. It's too big and complicated for people who don't have full time jobs working on it to work on it.

    8. Re:let me translte for ya by Noitatsidem · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you aren't aware of all the companies backing LibreOffice? They don't run LibreOffice in the sense that Sun/Oracle did, but they are contributing. Here, I'll name just two of the companies that are supporting the document foundation: Google, and Redhat (now I want you to let me know if you haven't heard of these, I'd be more than happy to tell you about them.)

      --
      Feel free to mod me down, just know that unlike some Anonymous Cowards I'm not afraid to express my views as myself.
    9. Re:let me translte for ya by mbkennel · · Score: 1

      Sure. There's support and there's support.

      How many paid full time developers & testers (working at standard salaries for skilled professionals, which is on the order of ~80,000-130,000 USD salary p.a.) working on Libre/Open Office?

      a) before Oracle fires all of theirs
      b) after Oracle fires of all of theirs

      This isn't a rhetorical question. But I'd bet that the ratio of (b) / (a) is under 0.3.

    10. Re:let me translte for ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If what you say is true. Then why is LibreOffice already so much better than OpenOffice ever was?

      Because OpenOffice is open source and its fixes and improvements flow downstream freely. LibreOffice takes anything of worth from OpenOffice and does not give back.

      If you were given a beautiful car like a Ferrari if only you did improve it somehow, would you manage to do it? Of course you would: Just replace the standard speaker cables with genuine monster cables.

    11. Re:let me translte for ya by gdshaw · · Score: 1

      As for Oracle? The lesson here is, and I'm sure I'll get hate for pointing it out, but the lesson is FOSS is "free as in worthless" if you are a corp because you actually buy nothing for your money. they should have waited until Sun flatlined and picked it up for a song and ditched the FOSS and kept the IP copyrights and patents. Because as Libre Office proved it doesn't matter how much you pay for something if the FOSSies get their panties in a wad it quickly becomes not worth the effort. From what I saw oracle didn't do a damned thing different than sun before them, but because Sun was the "good guys" and Oracle was "One Rich Asshole Called Larry Ellison" it didn't really matter.

      That's true whenever you buy a business where a large part of the value is goodwill. If you annoy your customers or employees too much then they will walk and the value is gone.

    12. Re:let me translte for ya by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      Tons of developers from oracle's openoffice have already been jumping ship to libre office, so really, not at all like you protray on that.

    13. Re:let me translte for ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another groundless crusade brought to you by one of the most self aggrandizing tools Slashdot has ever seen. I look forward to reading your obituary once your auto-erotic self asphyxiation fetish catches up with you.

    14. Re:let me translte for ya by hairyfeet · · Score: 0

      Aww isn't that cute, poor wittle FOSSie AC can't come up with a single intelligent argument and therefor has to insult. Poor wittle FOSSie, didn't the kool aid taste good? here let me use small words so you can understand:

      If I am a corporation with a couple of billion to buy a company what do you have to offer me besides a "gee thanks for teh money LOL!" hmmm? The answer NOTHING because with FOSS that is all you CAN offer since nobody OWNS anything. That was the whole point of RMS's little utopia, no ownership.

      So with that being that case, what companies would be willing to waste money on buying a FOSS company? Answer: trolls as IP is the ONLY thing that you can "own" in FOSS. This is of course due to RMS fucking up when he wrote GPL V2, and he tried to do away with patents and copyrights in GPL V3, but nobody is touching that thing with a 50 foot pole, not even Linus.

      So how about instead of fantasizing about my large penis, why not answer the question? What do you have to offer the corporate world besides your worthless "goodwill" hmm? The Oracle deal proved you get neither the code nor the developers so ALL Oracle got for all that money was IP they can use to sue with and office furniture. Mark my words and mark them well: After the corporate world saw how Oracle didn't get shit for their money the ONLY ones that will be buying FOSS companies will be trolls.

      You will also see more and more go tits up as the "community" doesn't even have enough sense not to shit in their own beds, witness Red hat, who gives back more than the top three combined last I checked yet a full 34% of the servers out there are running NOT RHEL but CentOS. Yeah that's smart, lets withhold funds from the ONE company that gives back damned near everything they make. Smart. But go ahead, you keep thinking about my dick instead of asking the hard questions, it is better that way.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    15. Re:let me translte for ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jim Gosling is not an auxiliary person who is easily replaceable.

    16. Re:let me translte for ya by Jalfro · · Score: 1

      Because OpenOffice is open source and its fixes and improvements flow downstream freely. LibreOffice takes anything of worth from OpenOffice and does not give back.

      Except of course that Libre Office is open source too and OO is free to take anything it likes. In fact, wasn't it OO's reluctance to include their ideas that made the LO developers leave in the first place?

    17. Re:let me translte for ya by salesgeek · · Score: 1

      To compete you are gonna need Billions with a B, where is it gonna come from? Not Red hat, because the community is screwing them raw, what with over 34% of the servers out there running NOT RHEL but CentOS. Novell? Practically tits up. Mandriva? Life support. Apple? Moving away from any GPL code as fast as they can. So who is left? Can't just join hands and wish upon a star you know. Devs need to eat, have a roof, etc. Can't all be MIT bums.

      SaaS much? IBM Global Services any? Android Phone Manufacturers some (see Motorola before Droid and after)? Oblivious to reality? Definitely.

      The GPL is hard on people that want to write software and milk it for 15-20 years with incremental, insignificant patches and rely on holding customers hostage with proprietary and undocumented data formats. Open Source is a bitch for incompetent IT people that don't know how computers really work because at some level, the name of the game is being able to program -- and to be able to program... well, you actually have to understand the computer and not see it as a glorified component stereo.

      It's really high time that you look at what's going on. Open source is everywhere - and people ARE making money from it. From gadgets to servers, from startups to global corporations, open source is there. And someone (apparently not you) is making money from it. You sound like someone who is bitter because a PHP content manager put your Windows CMS out of business.

      --
      -- $G
    18. Re:let me translte for ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hairyfeet runs a computer retail store. His statistic about servers is pretty funny. Who the hell uses windows in a server environment these days? Few by choice I'd guess.

    19. Re:let me translte for ya by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I grant you that Hairyfeet has an interesting way with words, but if you see past the foaming at the mouth s/he (ok, almost certainly he) makes a lot of sense.

      NOBODY chooses an OS for idealistic reasons. Well, nobody in the real world. Practicality rules above all else and if you don't understand that, you will never get widespread adoption in a given market.

      All your staff know Windows and only Windows? Windows it is. Do you have any idea how much it costs to re-train staff or hire new? The risks involved in hiring new staff? You'd be barking mad to do it unless you had a damn good reason.

      You need to run an application which only runs under Windows? Windows it is. Business is risky enough as it is, you're certainly not going to tie the success of your business to some random product neither you nor anybody in your industry has ever heard of for idealistic reasons purely because it's the only thing you can find that runs under Linux. (Forget Wine. Nobody's going to call their software vendor, ask for support and then say "Oh, by the way it's not actually running on Windows..." because they know what will happen. The vendor will just hang up on them.)

      Contrariwise, you have a bunch of staff who know Linux, no budget for server software and no particular need to run Windows on the server? Then, (and pretty much only then), Linux it shall be.

  26. Too late. by smcn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've already switched to LibreOffice.

    1. Re:Too late. by nuclear_zealot · · Score: 1

      Already switched too. Whatever, Oracle. What are you up to with VirtualBox?

    2. Re:Too late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The business case is clear for keeping VirtualBox alive and well, rather than shelling out for VMWare and/or letting customer dollars flow to VMWare.

      Thus, VirtualBox is alive and well, and likely to remain so for the foreseeable future.

  27. Oracle Lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They are trying to take the Document Foundation and Libre Office brands now.

    Do not fall for Oracle's scam. Back LibreOffice and the Document Foundation.

    Show Oracle how we play the game. Kill Oracle Open Office by not using it.

    1. Re:Oracle Lost by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      Actually AC, we can put a Gamer mentality on it. We can use both, and note here and there where the two programs don't render the same to watch out for MS style rendering tricks. Then treat it like it is "on loan". Slurp the good code out of it and include it into LibreOffice (if it hasn't already) before they take it away again.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    2. Re:Oracle Lost by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      And otherwise, wait and observe which form the "give it back" takes. If Oracle does something that is not easily reversed, like giving the Open Office trademark to an independent foundation, we may assume they are sincere. If they only make promises without substance, stay wary.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    3. Re:Oracle Lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is already an independant foundation, its called DOCUMENT FOUNDATION and their product is LIBRE OFFICE.

      Why do you want another?

      Pick a side

    4. Re:Oracle Lost by Ashe+Tyrael · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To be fair, one of the things the Libreoffice peeps have done is started going to town on the "this is awful/redundant code, can you help us rewrite it" thing, complete with one of the nicest ideas I've seen, http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks

      Basically, a list of stuff that needs doing, but they don't necessarily have time for, but is easy enough that a beginner/lower level coder can do the grunt work. Eases people into working with a big project.

      --
      "How fine you look when dressed in rage."
  28. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by Asic+Eng · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Be that as it may: that's good news. OpenOffice is a well established (and well chosen) name it will be good to have it back for the OSS community.

  29. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft announced they are giving Windows Vista to the Ubuntu Foundation.

  30. Thanks by atari800 · · Score: 0

    for the fire drill!

  31. LibreOffice has better icons by Zandamesh · · Score: 5, Informative

    The first thing I though when I installed it was: woah, these icons look awesome!

    --
    Lo and behold, for I am a sig!
    1. Re:LibreOffice has better icons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LiberOffice HAS A CRAPPY NAME!
      Moreover, PDF export crashes the program all the time.

    2. Re:LibreOffice has better icons by Shin-LaC · · Score: 1

      I don't like the LibreOffice application icon. It looks too much like a generic document.

    3. Re:LibreOffice has better icons by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Really, never had that happen to me with OpenOffice *or* LibreOffice. And I ran both on XP, Ubuntu and Arch Linux. Biggest difference I've seen is a VAST improvement of .doc compatibility.

    4. Re:LibreOffice has better icons by jo_ham · · Score: 2

      I agree, the original OpenOffice icon, especially on OS X, looks very nice - the sweeping line separating the two shades of blue and the two stylised birds. It's one of the icons that I "keep" in my Dock, unlike some truly ugly app icons that are only there when the apps are running that I launch from the Apps springloaded folder.

      I wanted to loved LibreOffice but the name and icon are... suboptimal. I think this makes me shallow, but I like my UI to look good, especially if I am staring at it for long periods. There's no reason for modern app icons to look poor - and it's not just open projects that fall victim to this, commercial apps are just as guilty.

    5. Re:LibreOffice has better icons by manicb · · Score: 1

      1. Open Applications folder
      2. Select OpenOffice.org and LibreOffice, "Get Info"
      3. Click on OpenOffice.org icon in top left of its panel, hit command-C to copy
      4. Click on LibreOffice icon in top left of its panel, hit command-V to paste
      5. Drag LibreOffice from Applications menu to dock.

    6. Re:LibreOffice has better icons by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      I did that for all the original Creative Suite 1 apps, with a modified community-created set of icons, since the original ones were awful. The ones for the new suites (which I don't have) are similarly pretty terrible.

      CS1 (PS, InDesign, Illlustrator) still sit on my dock with the much nicer community icons to this day.

  32. NEWS FLASH: NO MONEY WHEN YOU GIVE IT AWAY !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you give it away, they may come, but they don't even leave tips, donchano !!

    And besides, multi-biillion dollar company and that stinker just doesn't sit well with the money grubbers.

  33. Re:Forsks work aren't they by ae1294 · · Score: 1

    Could not someone at slashdot write a small script to blacklist url's that have been flagged troll? I'll do it if you pay me a slave wage...

    Could? Sure. Should? Every GNAA post would be linking to the BBC or Google or Slashdot itself just to get them blacklisted. Some sort of manually put together blacklist would be feasible for sites that do actual damage (but not for crap like Goatse - everyone on the planet must be bored of it by now but it's hardly going to hurt you)

    I think you give the fucktards too much credit. Firstly it wouldn't have to prevent a user from clicking it, maybe just a friendly warning. Second why do we, the "tech coward" ever need to link using tinyurl.com. Thirdly I think it could be done in a way that would avoid the problem you note.

    Honestly it would make a fun project that could be marketed to other forums... Yes Slashdot overlords you could get a larger bonus this year if you force your tech slaves to get on this... I assure you we are talking 7 figure profits here...

  34. Re:Goatse by ae1294 · · Score: 3, Funny

    but not for crap like Goatse - everyone on the planet must be bored of it by now but it's hardly going to hurt you

    Are you sure about that? Some people may have been scarred for life.

    A -1 goatse mod would be a start.. but nooooo change is bad unless it slows down the site or is shiny...

  35. Re:Forsks work aren't they by Anon-Admin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You dont have to blacklist the URL. Just strip all url's from any post tagged as TROLL. Should take care of the issue.

  36. Let them keep their oO.o fork by symbolset · · Score: 2

    It is a trap, a trick to try and salvage some tiny remnant of influence now that they've lost control of the mindshare and developers.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  37. At least they aren't Anonymous... by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 1

    ...Goatse posters would just give Anonymous a bad name.

    --
    I8-D
  38. Woah by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

    Who are you, and what have you done with Oracle?

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Woah by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      No, no problem about what you made to Oracle. We just stopped you to tell the address of Congress; it's over there.

    2. Re:Woah by jd · · Score: 1

      Tod and Ryley: They pushed us, so we had them Replaced.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:Woah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay Larry. Step back.

    4. Re:Woah by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Must be delayed April 1st. Sony is actively promoting rooting their android phones and gives you a simple method of doing it too

  39. pffffffft by ItsLenny · · Score: 1

    I for one would NEVER donate money to oracle (open office) .. but I'd gladly donate to The Document Foundation to use libre ... Seriously screw oracle everyone should use Libre and never look back. I don't care which one has a better name OSS community should have no question about which to embrace.

    --
    ----------
    Trying to fix or change something only guarantees and perpetuates it's existence
    1. Re:pffffffft by Aldenissin · · Score: 1

      Aye, it is Oracle that is hoping to keep their embrace, so that one day "soon" they may be able to extend. We all here for the most part know what the last e is, I think.

      --
      Like a city whose walls are broken down is a man who lacks self-control.
  40. Please, let's keep LibreOffice brand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even if Oracle gives OO.org brand to the comunnity, I think it's a great opportunity to stick with LibreOffice and leave behind all karma associated with the OpenOffice age.

    1. Re:Please, let's keep LibreOffice brand by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      The ODF could use the opportunity to make both brands available. That way they can use the momentum of OO.org and the freshness of LO. They can put the current name on some configuration file somewhere, and distribute the rest of the code unchanged.

    2. Re:Please, let's keep LibreOffice brand by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Why not just take the best of both worlds and go with the short and sweet name: Office

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    3. Re:Please, let's keep LibreOffice brand by shibashaba · · Score: 1

      Seriously, you need to get out more. Libreoffice has absolutely zero brand name recognition outside of people who read every little bit of tech news. Nobody cares, other than the fact that it's a very stupid, almost childish name.

      I'm not saying I don't use Open/Go/Libre/Whatever the fuck it is this week office for my few needs. To even think of marketing for this 'product' is insane. It is a cheap alternative to Microsoft and Corel Office. It was open sourced so sun could spend less money maintaining it. Which is all thats really happened. All this LibreOffice thing does is make the community surrounding it look petty, regardless of their reasons.

      I know I'm gonna get flamed for this, but it needs to be said. Having said that, I do appreciate greatly the work of the volunteers, however I think everyone is getting a little carried away with themselves here.

      --
      ---------- Open Source is capitalism applied to IP.
    4. Re:Please, let's keep LibreOffice brand by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify, my comment above was intended as a joke, and I think it is an absurdly bad idea*. Now, you are downplaying a bit too much the importance of brands, they aren't a panacea, but they also aren't useless.

    5. Re:Please, let's keep LibreOffice brand by shibashaba · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it's hard to tell sometimes who's being serious and not. I am glad to hear your not offended.

      I do agree that brands are important, but OpenOffice has the brand name recognition outside of the techworld. Not a whole lot but it is there, I just talked to my boss at work(a restraunt) and she's been using OpenOffice for years as a replacement for Works. That was my point. If the project were to have to change names permanently though, she's someone that would pick up on it right away.

      --
      ---------- Open Source is capitalism applied to IP.
  41. Re:Forsks work aren't they by ae1294 · · Score: 2

    You dont have to blacklist the URL. Just strip all url's from any post tagged as TROLL.

    Should take care of the issue.

    Agreed, I like my -1 Goatse mod idea but your idea would work.. How about instead of stripping the link totally it just strips the html link bit out and leaves the text so if someone wants to see a gaping hole they still can manually copy/paste.

  42. what a coincidence.. by Jeek+Elemental · · Score: 5, Funny

    the story before this one was "Students Build Life-Sized Trojan Horse For Class Project"

    1. Re:what a coincidence.. by a_nonamiss · · Score: 1

      I see what you did there. Wish I had mod points. :-)

      --
      -Arthur
      Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
  43. Re:Forsks work aren't they by Tolkien · · Score: 1

    Better yet, ban the use of URL shorteners. This isn't twitter.

  44. A no win Battle by TrueSatan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Oracle (and Sun before them) were, prior to the fork that created LibreOffice, able to prevent the additional features that were in their commercial Ooo derivative from being added to Ooo itself and thus had a product that they could monetise. Novel sponsored GoOo and that then offered code Sun (and then Oracle) would not allow into Ooo (mostly to "protect" those additional, commercial derivative only, features) and this was what first put the skids on Oracle's continuing support of Ooo. Once LibreOffice merged the GoOo code into their Ooo fork there was no real point in Oracle attempting to sustain hope for their commercial derivative...it has simply taken them a while to acknowledge its demise. As there's now no money in it for them their "handing to the community" of Ooo means little and may well come with the existing bylaws of Ooo that will preclude a merger with the Libreoffice fork. Out of spite alone (WaaaaaI If I can't play with my ball I'll take it away so nobody can play with it.) I can't see them making a merger of the two into a possibility.

    1. Re:A no win Battle by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      In that case OO.org will simply disappear into obscurity. Sure, for a while name recognition will keep in going, but in the end it's toast. I've got some other big projects on the fly, but likely in June I'll be moving the thirty workstations we have running OO.org over to LibreOffice, mainly for OOXML support (though it's still far from perfect). Once we're down that path, there's no way in hell I'm going to move back to OO.org, even if they roll in the GoOo features, simply because I've got better things to do. So if OO.org is serious about keeping guys like me on, they'd better roll in those changes damned fast.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:A no win Battle by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      A commercial fork doesn't really need to offer any additional features, it just needs to have a price tag and come with support... There are all kinds of companies that, with the right marketing, will quite happily buy openoffice from a big name like oracle but wouldn't even consider using the free version.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  45. Re:"Prank" Window by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2

    Here's the page source.

    Wouldn't this be like a vulnerability? Doesn't seem to work on Opera though.

    var yBase = screen.width / 2;
    var xBase = screen.height / 2;
    var delay = 10;
    var step = .2;
    var currStep = 0;
    var Xpos = screen.width / 4;
    var Ypos = screen.height / 2;
    var j=0;

    function start() {
            window.resizeTo(500,500);

            movew0w();

    }

    function movew0w() {
            for ( j = 0 ; j

    The above fine work of art is © the Goatse guy.
    Thanks to goatse.ru for hosting it.

    setTimeout("start()", 1000);

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  46. Re:Goatse by sleepy_weasel · · Score: 1

    ... or you don't allow AC to post links... that'd be the easiest.

    --
    It's all damned lies and statistics!! I mean 47% of all people use statistics to back up their arguments.
  47. Someone at Oracle just had an "oh crap" moment by TheSpoom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And this is how it got expressed. LibreOffice people, just keep doing your thing. You don't need corporate control.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  48. Re:Goatse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... or you don't allow AC to post links... that'd be the easiest.

    I guess it would be easy but how it would it help? As far as I can see goatse links are usually posted under user names. Certainly the one that started ths thread was.

  49. Clingy Ex-Husband by dcollins · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, it feels like a clingy, manipulative ex-husband. "This time I'll change", etc., etc.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    1. Re:Clingy Ex-Husband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or a clingy manipulative ex-wife?

    2. Re:Clingy Ex-Husband by Aldenissin · · Score: 1

      Oh Dave, I'm so sorry, how will I be able to thank you? Mmmmm, nck nck nck nck nck... yessss, nck nck nck nck.

      Get Oracle out of here! "No, wait, wait, let'm finish. "There will be peace in the middle office suite...."

      --
      Like a city whose walls are broken down is a man who lacks self-control.
  50. and a couple stories down about a Trojan Horse by Locutus · · Score: 1

    maybe it's just a coincidence but given how Oracle has acted in the past, we should all be wondering what gives with the turn around.
    Maybe there's a patent or two they are holding behind their backs which have recently obtained from Novell. boo!

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    1. Re:and a couple stories down about a Trojan Horse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think this is a turn around, they just worked out they couldn't make enough money off it. The title could have equally been Oracle Abandons Open Office, the truth is somewhere in between.

  51. Keep LibreOffice by bragr · · Score: 1

    I actually like the name LibreOffice a lot better than OpenOffice.org, which I have always thought was kinda silly. I'm hoping the document foundation keeps the new name.

    1. Re:Keep LibreOffice by kvvbassboy · · Score: 1

      It takes too much effort to say it though "Lee -bru - office". OpenOffice is just easier on my tongue. Damn French...

  52. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think oracle deserves some credit for this decision. They looked at their core mission, they looked at their resources, and discovered they had a product that was not a good fit. In the case of Sun, openoffice.org was a small part of a solution for the desktop. For Oracle it was not. It was an asset that may or may not be worth something. It could have helped out the Java asset. It did not. So they let it go. They could have made an attempt to make money off it, and let the brand flounder and die. They did not. I think Oracle, unlike some tech companies, does not just randomly try things and let's products die, to customer detriment, when something does not work. They are pros. They have customers that us openoffice.org, that use the brand to give them some protection, and this gift was for them.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  53. Sounds like .... by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    corporate-speak bullshit. In actuality, I'll bet Oracle was more concerned about the public image damage by trying to wreck a community's efforts at developing an open source productivity suit. Also, Oracle could have been concerned about running afoul of the GPL license. They certainly took a lot of flack from the community over this one including some high level software engineer defectors. I think we would have a lot more respect for Oracle if they were to come out and simply say, "We made a mistake. Openoffice belongs with community." Oracle, Microsoft, Apple, et al. have a very pschitzophrenic, love/hate relationship with open source. They like having the ability to tap the vast resources of the community for developement but hate being undercut by a free product. This is why, depending upon the day, they are either praising or seeking to screw open source. It just depends on the motivation and whether or not the particular open source product is helping or hindering.

  54. Re:Forsks work aren't they by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

    slashdot sigs are twitter.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  55. MySQL??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MySQL?..... MySQL?......... Did I just hear some distant crickets? They didn't include MySQL when they 'Freed' OpenOffice.org? But why oh why not? Could it be... .could it be that they.... could it be that they ... *want* to continue monetizing MySQL, or at least keep it out of the marketplace or restrict it in the marketplace so that people wanting online dynamic web servers powered by a database in the backend.... be required to use a teensy more expensive option than MySQL.... like postgresSQL, or msql, or mssql, or..... or..... or oracle? NO!, thats not it, no no no no no! .......yes.

  56. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by Monkey-Man2000 · · Score: 1

    Be that as it may: that's good news. OpenOffice is a well established (and well chosen) name it will be good to have it back for the OSS community.

    OpenOffice is a decent name, but who the fuck names a software program with a web domain (i.e., OpenOffice.org)? Ugghhhhh.... That's one distinct and major advantage LibreOffice has in my mind. It may not be as obvious a name, but at least it doesn't appear to be run by a bunch of weirdos at first glance...

    --
    This post was generated by a Cadre of Uber Monkeys for Monkey-Man2000 (603495).
  57. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    x.org battle.net

  58. Set Java free too! by jomcty · · Score: 1

    Oracle, what about Java? Set it free!

    1. Re:Set Java free too! by Lord+of+the+Fries · · Score: 1

      Kind of like letting a convict out of prison at the end of his life to enjoy his last few years, at this point.

      --
      One man's pink plane is another man's blue plane.
  59. Its a trap by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    I don't trust Oracle. Give me one good reason why we should?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  60. Re:Forsks work aren't they by gpuk · · Score: 1

    Or Slashdot should just auto re-write all urls from shortening services (e.g. http://tinyurl.com/6gabfug becomes http://slashurl.com/tinyurl/6gabfug) and then give you an intermediary page where the url is expanded to show the real source.

  61. Layoff prequel by haemish · · Score: 1

    This is just Oracle's way of saying "Hey, you remaining engineers in Hamburg, your RIF notice is in the mail"

    1. Re:Layoff prequel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be precise "hey folks, just a few month ago we said we would invest more in OpenOffice.org development than Sun did, that was a lie, and now we RIF all StarOffice people because we are not competent enough to make money from a product that is the number two (no pun intended) in a billion dollar market."

      The few libreoffice developers will enjoy more spare time as they do not need to merge changes from the hamburg team anymore.

  62. Jenkins / Hudson by tomhermann · · Score: 2

    I wish they would've taken this approach with the Hudson CI server rather than fragmenting the community.

    http://jenkins-ci.org/content/about-jenkins-ci

  63. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhm, I think you haven't been following up on a lot of the turmoil going that led to the formation of the Document Foundation and LibreOffice. There is no aspect to Oracle's handling of OpenOffice.org that should be surprising to anyone. Unfortunately Oracle appears to be intentionally creating a divisive atmosphere on so many of the products it gobbled up from Sun.

  64. Go fuck yourselves. by unity100 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Its too late. you should have thought it before going 'oracle' on your community. now there's libre office.

  65. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think this is more like "We really screwed up with the community, and now let's do the only thing possible to make them forget what turkeys we've been".

  66. Not exactly a "mass brain drain'. by mbkennel · · Score: 1

    More "mass brain guillotineage"

  67. Funny by frps25 · · Score: 1

    It is so funny to see you guys unable to get over the idea that this program name "LibreOffice" incorporates a spanish word, it's like seeing you banging your head against the wall and repeating "Argh! not possible, WHY, WHY"

    1. Re:Funny by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      eh, I don't know anyone that cares about that. Myself, I just wonder why it's not LibreOficina

    2. Re:Funny by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      eh, I don't know anyone that cares about that. Myself, I just wonder why it's not LibreOficina
      With the OO name back we should rename it to be more similar to the LO name... The OO branch can be called: <b>LibreCachot</b> (French, for the sort of offices you'll find at Oracle.)

  68. Best thing about LibreOffice... by Culture20 · · Score: 2

    It's not named LibreOffice.org.

  69. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by SomePgmr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Respectfully, I think you give them too much credit. Sounds suspiciously like, "We're not going to make anything on this, throw 'em a bone. We'll focus on Oracle Cloud Office and avoid allocating valuable resources to this thing in the back of the shipping container." Though that could just be how the release and write-up were worded.

  70. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by CRCulver · · Score: 1

    OpenOffice.org was originally called OpenOffice, but then it turned out that someone already had rights to the name. At this point, OpenOffice.org already had the website and had done an enormous amount of advertising, so it seemed like the best option was just to officially call the project "OpenOffice.org" while everyone still colloquially used the name "OpenOffice".

  71. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

    Yuh. My first thought was "wow, that many people left for LibreOffice?"

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  72. Re:Forks work, aren't they? by hxnwix · · Score: 1

    I admire your persistence, but what happened to your perineum?!

  73. Oracle by wukka · · Score: 1

    Oracle should have immediately addressed the opensource community after taking over Sun/Java/Openoffice and all. Instead Oracle alienated, so a great big capital F-U Oracle! I use Gnumeric anyway, but it is fkn fantastic that LibreOffice rose from the ashes for those who need an office suite.

  74. Great News by Lord+of+the+Fries · · Score: 1

    OpenOffice was an unprovable experiment in its old state. It's like a FOSS program that wasn't. It did the FOSS thing, but it had a chunk of staff being paid to work on it, when it wasn't really

    The open source community can now prove whether they can write a large program of this type when not underwritten by a dying company. For some things, FOSS is great, and the community accomplishes alot, and for types of software, I've begun to believe that the open source model we're familiar with just doesn't work well. I'm not sure what needs to exist in that case.

    And if someone wants to make money making a commercial version, they can even try that, because it's out of Oracle/Sun hands now.

    --
    One man's pink plane is another man's blue plane.
    1. Re:Great News by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Where it doesn't (yet) work well is in domains that require massive amounts (people-decades) of specialized normally highly-paid professional experience to build the software. CAE/CADD/CAM realm is one example, the open source programs are a joke compared to the proprietary ones.

  75. I question a 1% difference is "so much better" by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    why is LibreOffice already so much better than OpenOffice ever was?

    Listen, I tried open office from 1.04.

    It wasn't quite there yet.

    But as of 3.00 I went to OO and had no need to look back.

    I even had a large series of Word 1998/2000/2003 documents which would not work in Word 2010 and 2007. No explanation-no error message - they just hung.

    I loaded them into OO (which I'd used since as early as 1.04 to fix broken Word documents which crashed word by loading and resaving them) and the problem was apparent. The bounding boxes on the artwork was overlapping the tables. These did not display in Word so it would have been nearly impossible to fix.

    So.. I bit the bullet and converted my 100 page document from Word to OO. It took about 8 hours. I got to learn about what the "little grey lines" meant and about styles. I figured out the replacement for techniques like "styleref".

    So then I converted my next 130 page document. It took 2 hours.

    Then I converted all the rest of my documents- each taking under 2 hours.

    Bonus? They printed MUCH faster than in word. Seriously- these things were taking 15 minutes to print in Word before they became unusable- now they printed in seconds in OO.

    Libreoffice-- well it's different (not necessarily better- it does some new things OO doesn't- OO does some new things LO doesn't.). I'm okay with EITHER since either will load my OPENDOCUMENT format documents.

    I'm no longer LOCKED IN to word. I no longer have to pay HUNDREDS of dollars for new versions every 3 years.

    I've gotten in to Openoffice draw and created lots of maps and pictures and have developed a basic tool set of objects I can use in the documents.

    I've gotten into Openoffice Calc and written a starfleet battles damage allocation program (complete with sound effects) which I can port to Excel if I ever felt the need to.

    In business- I'm forced to use Word, Excel, Powerpoint. I *still* (after 12 months ) am struggling with these new interfaces. I'll be fine then I want to do something that used to be easy and it's very hard. I waste a few hours trying to find out where the hell they moved the command in Word.

    And when I use word, I look for OO features which are not implemented in word and it's jarring since Word is supposed to have everything including the kitchen sink.

    Libre office, Open office. They are both excellent and SUFFICIENT programs even if they cost up to $75. But they don't- they are free.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:I question a 1% difference is "so much better" by ancienthart · · Score: 1

      Very true. There is only one feature that I find Microsoft Office has that I wish LibreOffice would get, and that's the solver algorithm in Excel (Generalised Reduced Gradient). There are a small group of problems that I CAN'T solve in Calc, that Excel chews through. *sigh* So at work, I'm stuck with switching back to Microsoft Office (Uggghhh) whenever I need the stronger solver.

    2. Re:I question a 1% difference is "so much better" by Sara+Chan · · Score: 1

      Libre office, Open office. They are both excellent and SUFFICIENT.

      For me, the lack of a good grammar checker is a serious issue.

    3. Re:I question a 1% difference is "so much better" by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      You are writing 100 page documents and you were using word or open office?

      LaTeX is what you need, handles typesetting for you nicely and everything.

    4. Re:I question a 1% difference is "so much better" by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      I agree with your general point. However, just for this:

      > I waste a few hours trying to find out where the hell they moved the command in Word.

      I feel I must bring you the word of the holey Google. It is good.

      Also, any examples of things in OO or LO that aren't in MsW ?

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    5. Re:I question a 1% difference is "so much better" by udippel · · Score: 2

      For me, the lack of a good grammar checker is a serious issue.

      Fully agree! That's why I wouldn't spend a fiver for Microsoft Office. OpenOffice also cannot, but at least it cannot for free.

    6. Re:I question a 1% difference is "so much better" by psnyder · · Score: 2

      Libreoffice-- well it's different (not necessarily better- it does some new things OO doesn't- OO does some new things LO doesn't.)

      This is wrong as far as I know. Libreoffice is the latest OpenOffice with Go-OO fixes and some plug-ins merged in. Go-OO was made during a time when developers were getting frustrated that OO development was stagnating and they weren't being allowed to include improvements and fixes. So they made them available elsewhere, at go-oo.org

      LO will continue to fork, but for now, it's OO with bug fixes and improvements. They even used the same version number, 3.3, because "The Document Foundation and most of the software's developers saw LibreOffice as being a direct continuation of OpenOffice.org"

      So I'm curious what you mean when you say OO does something LO doesn't, as I can't think of anything. LO is currently the same product (plus a few fixes/addons).

    7. Re:I question a 1% difference is "so much better" by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I like the visual cropping. I can see exactly what is happening instead of cropping, exiting the cropping menu and seeing what effect it had, then going back in.

      Likewise I got really used to the format menu structure right away- it made sense in a way the new word ribbon didn't.

      The last serious problem was something around formatting tables in excel. I can't remember the exact feature I was trying to use but it used to be on the menus and for some reason I couldn't find the damn thing in the new ribbon structure. If I remember later I'll repost.

      I haven't used google- I've been using the word help files which are usually sufficient but they didnt' work in that case. I guess i should try google next time.

      They are getting farther apart- I really struggled badly for the first six months but I only stumble on something about once a month now. I had used Word since 1998 and I found the ribbon change very painful. It's the way that things are hidden or contextual- you have to figure out what to hit to get the right options to come up. I'm not explaining it very well.

      But it comes up on a minor basis still- I'll hit "view" and I need to be in "design" and I need to be in the table or out of the table while I do this.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    8. Re:I question a 1% difference is "so much better" by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I've heard this before.

      What would be a good wysiwyg editor? I see a reference to LyX in google.

      What do you recommend?

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    9. Re:I question a 1% difference is "so much better" by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      Okay- I had the impression there were minor differences however you are correct.

      Libre is a fork of OO and has these notable additions.

              * SVG image import
              * Lotus Word Pro and MS Works import filters
              * Improved WordPerfect import
              * Dialog box for title pages
              * Navigator lets you unfold one heading as usual in a tree view
              * "Experimental" mode that allows users to test out unfinished features
              * Certain bundled extensions (including Presenter View in Impress)
              * Color-coded document icons

      What are the features which are so spectacular that OO is now trash and Libre is Zomg the best?

      To me they seem 99% the same. There is some comment of new bugs in Libre as a result of adding the Gooo ( something around PDF's which made LO unusable for someone).

      I don't hate LO. I don't love OO. I have both on my computer but haven't had time to open and test drive LO.

      Since I can afford to have both, even at double the price, I will.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    10. Re:I question a 1% difference is "so much better" by syockit · · Score: 1

      No, LyX is a WYSIWYM (what you see is what you mean). Not quite WYS. An example of WYSIWYG for LaTeX would be OpenOffice/LibreOffice.

      Yes, I'm trolling.

      --
      Democracy is for the people; you only vote once per season and we'll do the rest of the work for you don't have to.
    11. Re:I question a 1% difference is "so much better" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lyx is awesome. I never learned LaTeX, and I'm not using even 25% of the capability - but just the basic stuff is awesome. :)

    12. Re:I question a 1% difference is "so much better" by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      LyX (Which is quite nice, but still overlays LaTeX which is not for the novice)

      Or a proper WYSIWYG typesetting program....

      Word is a document editor, not a typesetting program , this really shows when working with long documents .... they corrupt crash get weird stuff in them ...the same is true to some degree for OO/LO although it does seem to recover from corrupt files better than Word ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
  76. You have issues that need addressed... by meosborne · · Score: 5, Informative

    Perhaps your rant applies in *your* world, but it certainly doesn't apply in mine. The company I work for has been using OpenOffice.org quite happily for years. It does everything we need to do. We've integrated it into a majority of our workflows. We've felt no loss from not having either Microsoft Office or even Windows. Yeah, we're a double conundrum. We're a long-term successful business who doesn't use Microsoft Office or Windows. And we're not even a remotely IT-related business, nor are most of our employees computer experts.

    In short, I think you are completely full of it.

  77. Lack of vision by Compaqt · · Score: 1

    Even if they can't monetize it in the short term, OpenOffice is admitted (if in private) by MS to be a threat.

    MS Office is the way that Microsoft enforces it's synergy/monopoly in the "enterprise": office apps + server apps.

    Oracle needs to have a counterstory to MS Office easily accessing SQL Server data. It's not enough to just focus on Oracle DB.

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  78. WhOracle willin to settle to have their name on it by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    I hope LibriOffice, in spite of its bad name, buries Open Office.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
  79. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    Likely Oracle is looking to make a much greater internet push and rebuilding some of the damage done to it's public image by seeking to monetise it's purchase of Sun, will be aided by rebuilding the OpenOffice community and maybe even donating the domain Sun, to humanities efforts in space.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  80. And next to come : VirtualBox by imaginasys · · Score: 1

    Free VirtualBox from Oracle too!

    --
    My boss says he's not assuming any responsability of such a fool may say...
  81. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by Noitatsidem · · Score: 1

    If Oracle really wanted to make it up to the community, they'd join the document foundation and donate the openoffice name to them. They were offered to do this before, and rejected it.

    --
    Feel free to mod me down, just know that unlike some Anonymous Cowards I'm not afraid to express my views as myself.
  82. Google Trends -- Openoffice vs Libreoffice by BlackSupra · · Score: 2

    Google Trends --> http://www.google.com/trends?q=openoffice%2C+libreoffice&date=ytd

    Screen Cap: Openoffice vs Libreoffice --> http://i.imgur.com/7hY4G.png

  83. Too late by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

    OpenOffice is that things that's tainted by Oracle.
    Is there anybody not switching to LibreOffice?

  84. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

    That's not Oracle. We'll see what happens...

  85. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1
    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  86. Document Foundation lost their hearing aids by jjohn_h · · Score: 1

    I simply cannot come around to use ?????Office as long as it sticks to that name. Yes, there have been plenty of protesters and doubters, but where is the reaction from the Document Foundation?

    Possibly, the name OpenOffice can be used again now that Oracle signals white smoke. If not, all it takes is a major GNU/Linux distro to impose a new name. With compliments to the Document Foundation.

  87. Ooo is used in-house at Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "500 client org".

    Big deal. I work at Oracle.
    Oracle is a 100,000 person company.
    OpenOffice is part of the standard install kit for all PCs at Oracle.
    Do the numbers.

    Oracle is all about money.
    What Oracle is saying is that there is no sustainable business model behind Ooo. Now whether that is because LibreOffice has taken away key individuals or something else remains to be seen but if I was a VC or similar providing funding for LibreOffice, this would make me sit up real fast and wonder what my money is doing at LibreOffice.

    But to bring the above into the equation, is Oracle saying that the cost of maintaining Ooo in-house (plus the support revenue it brings in) is greater than the amount of money it saves on providing Microsoft Office licenses to each PC in the company?

  88. Re:Goatse by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Require good karma to allow link posting. You have to make some positive contributions before you're allowed to post goatse links. I think most people wouldn't mind the occasional goatse link if they required a few dozen insightful comments to build enough karma, and I think most trolls would get bored if they couldn't post them with a brand new account.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  89. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BattleNet was BattleNet before it was battle.net.

    You're on my lawn!

  90. Too late Oracle. Zebra does not change it strips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too late guys the horse has already bolted and you have burned your bridges with the open community.

    www.libreoffice.org is doing fine without you.

    G

  91. You Don't Have To Go Home, But You Can't Stay Here by jman.org · · Score: 1

    I hear the Document Foundation may be a good fit for this OpenOffice project.

  92. If everyone game LibreOffice $100 this year by ALeader71 · · Score: 1

    Imagine what this project could become if every LibreOffice fan and user gave the project $100 to develop this platform.

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of War. - Plato
  93. Take this, Oracle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a thought, Oracle: bugger off. I'm quite happy with using LibreOffice now and won't be returning to OOo any time soon. You burnt the community, now feel our wrath^H^H^H^H^H indifference :-)

    Like I would trust a company whose flagship product couldn't tell the difference between a NULL and an empty string.

    I'll tell you bods one thing though. In the investigative move away from OOo, I found Gnumeric, which absolutely annihilates OOo/Libre in terms of speed (at least under my Ubuntu 10.04). I'm now using it for my spreadsheets. Some of my legacy stuff is still in OOo/Libre format but the new stuff is definitely being done in Gnumeric. The difference is a sub-second startup time as opposed to greater than five seconds.

  94. if only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'd give back MySQL so we can fix the stored procedure and trigger issues. But at least replication works well.

  95. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect the mass brain drain of former Sun employees has a lot to do with it as well. It's hard to support your customers if everybody who knows how to support it has left the building. This just might be an olive branch to keep some of the talent from flying the coop long enough to get new blood up to speed.

    Mmm. Nah. Oracle does not care about their customers. They are a monopolist. The customers are not going anywhere.

  96. Give back ? by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 1

    As OpenOffice is GPL code, Oracle can't "give it back" to the community, because it doesn't really belong to them.

    Oracle could however give up control over the OpenOffice name or logo (because copyrights rules apply for such things) and give them for instance to the LibreOffice folks; but given the damages done to the OpenOffice image by Oracle, LibreOffice might probably not be interested...

    1. Re:Give back ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As OpenOffice is GPL code ...

      wrong

      because it doesn't really belong to them.

      wrong again

    2. Re:Give back ? by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 1

      As OpenOffice is GPL code ...

      wrong

      Ok, LGPL and not GPL, sorry...

      because it doesn't really belong to them.

      wrong again

      It doesn't belong to them in the sense that they can't put restrictions on the code already released. Agreed, they could theoretically release new code under a new license.

  97. Re:Forsks work aren't they by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

    At that point why not just expand it in the post when the post is saved and save all the extra traffic?

  98. Liberal Office by tepples · · Score: 1

    The cacophony wouldn't have been so bad if they had used the Latin stem, LiberOffice, etc.

    The U.S. right wing would be all over it: "Don't use that hippie Liberal Office."

  99. Re:Translation: They couldn't "monetize" it. by hawk · · Score: 1

    >In the case of Sun, openoffice.org was a small part of a solution for the desktop.

    It wasn't even *selling* staroffice/openoffice that was part of Sun desktop solution.

    Rather, it was the *existence* of such a product that matters to Sun on the desktop.

    Sun's vision is a central server running programs, with slimmer smart terminals rendering them. This requires a program compatible with the existing word processing and spreadsheet files already in use, and those that continue to be generated.

    An openoffice *existing* gives them what they need.

    There are similar explanations for IBM needing Apache and Apple with Darwin.

    If OpenOffice can thrive without Sun/Oracle/Adobe/whoever-they-are-this-week supporting/controlling it, Sun's needs are met.

    I published a paper on this a few years ago in Netnomics. I don't know if you can download the final paper, but there still seem to be plenty of draft versions floating around.

  100. Re:Goatse by Miseph · · Score: 1

    If you're so sheltered that Goatse scars you for life and you can never fully recover... good, you shouldn't be such a prude.

    It may not be my cup of tea, but it's just some guy's anus. There's some seriously fucked up shit in this world, Goatse hardly rates.

    --
    Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
  101. Watch out by formfeed · · Score: 1
    They said that the "OpenOffice.org project would be best managed by an organization focused on serving that broad constituency on a non-commercial basis"

    Nowhere did they say, that that organization would be the Document Foundation. Worst case, they try some half-ass community effort under Oracle control, that lures half the people back and kills both projects.

  102. Re:Forsks work aren't they by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    If there were no more trolls on Slashdot I wouldn't enjoy this forum half as much. It may be hard for you to understand, but some of us aren't particularly thin-skinned or prudish and we don't take the kind of content that's posted on Slashdot all that deadly seriously. I browse at -1; you, however, may choose to up your threshold a little bit so that you'll be less likely to see troll posts (once they're modded). The decision not to censor Slashdot was made many years before you ever started coming here, and I don't see any trends or new developments that I'd consider compelling reasons to change that decision.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  103. Maybe Oracle realized they weren't really holding by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    on to anything worth their time.

    From a purely economical point of view, OO is a complete waste of funds. Its too fat and bloated to run using a central server and dumb terminals for display.

    Its too big to be agile.

    Its to annoying to use to replace MS Office for most people who aren't geeks and doing it just to spite MS.

    The reality of it is, OO.org was a pretty shitty product compared to what it was competing with, and the ONLY reason it had a snowballs chance in hell is because it was free as in no cost. Outside of this community, the rest of the world doesn't give a flying fuck about libre, they want works. They'd be more than happy to pay for MS Office compat since everyone they want to deal with uses it and not OO.org.

    Sun was using it to try and compete with MS in some meaningful way, but that was pretty much a failure. Oracle probably just took a few minutes to look at it and simply said ... 'no fucking wonder Sun was going broke, this is a stupid waste of time, its never going to beat MS Office or even make a dent big enough for anyone to notice'.

    The only people who care are a statstically irrelevant portion of the population who are both geeks AND irrationally afraid of paying for software or running Windows. Since these sort of things don't apply to pretty much everyone else in the world, Oracle just did what any intelligent business would do. Its part of the reason Oracle still exists and Sun doesn't.

    You can mod me down, mark me as a troll or whatever because you're a rabid OSS/Anti-Microsoft zealot but that doesn't actually change reality. The sooner this is recognized the sooner you can move on to doing things that ACTUALLY promote OSS software and things that have a change of moving away from MS.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  104. Re:Forsks work aren't they by gpuk · · Score: 1

    lol good point. Looks like I need a KISS refresher course :D

  105. when to trust oracle by cel4145 · · Score: 1

    When the OO website links to LibreOffice, and tells people to download the latest version there, we'll now that Oracle is sincere.

  106. The one problem with LibreOffice... by Eclipse-now · · Score: 1

    ...is their email support! Yuk! An email list? Really? In this day and age of dozens of FOSS forum software they could install on their own servers and have a REAL community up and running? LibreOffice might be the cool hip new version of OO, but seriously guys install a forum! I need help now and then, not being real technical and all, and to post a question to an email list with hundreds of emails to scan through each day is sheer agony.

  107. Oracle, the good guys at last, such a warm glow... by alfielee · · Score: 0

    Here, take this back. We know databases & can't understand why anyone would want to work on anything else, especially this complex. Of course you'll have to pay for your Java subscription but like all Oracle subscriptions it's the best value for money! Arseholes...

  108. Troll - score 2 by mmell · · Score: 1

    There's one in every crowd, isn't there?

  109. Re:Goatse by DarkVader · · Score: 1

    I don't know. Goatse.cx was something of a defining moment for some of us. It was the point where we stopped caring about images we saw on the internet.

    I don't think I've seen a "shock site" since that has actually shocked me, or really bothered me in any way. Tubgirl? Yawn. Lemonparty? Gay guys get old too. 2 Girls 1 Cup? Eh, the music was ok, but I didn't even get slightly queasy. I can look at pictures of dismembered bodies while eating dinner now - I might not want to, but I can.

    So I suppose in a way I never recovered. And I'm ok with that - otherwise some of the really fucked up shit on the internet would get to me more than just being an annoyance.

    And that means I really don't have any interest in a link blocker. It's Slashdot, we've come to expect the occasional hello.jpg.

    Back on topic, good on Oracle. Now if they can just stop being evil everywhere else.

  110. Re:Maybe Oracle realized they weren't really holdi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't hate Microsoft because it owns everything, I hate it because I'm sick of it taking 30 minutes to reboot, having to shut down everything else just so I can burn a CD, the chirps and werbles when I want to listen to music, the lockups when I want to watch a movie... Microsoft was a great OS when windows 95-XP happened, it was better and easier to use at the time. Now it is an old boar ready for slaughter. I am happily running Fedora, can watch a movies and IM at the same time, I can burn a CD and write an email, while I'm listening to internet streaming radio... I have almost no issues and if I ever do they are fixed without waiting for a 30 minute reboot.

    I never want to use MicroSLOTH ever again. It moves too slowly. It is because of my disdain for it not solving issues and the fact that they break everything that I refuse to use any of their products. I can send anyone an ODT file and EVERYONE can open it. I don't have to ask what version of (whatever) do you have? Oh you need to upgrade again, it's only $150 to upgrade, just so you can view the document that I made on my own machine with the software I paid for. Screw that.

    FREEDOOOOOOOOM! LibreOffice has that.