Slashdot Mirror


Google Crowd-Sources Maps

Wamoc writes "Google has invited 'citizen cartographers' to refine the US map for Google Maps and Google Earth. 'Today we're opening the map of the United States in Google Map Maker for you to add your expert local knowledge directly. You know your neighborhood or hometown best, and with Google Map Maker you can ensure the places you care about are richly represented on the map. For example, you can fix the name of your local pizza parlor, or add a description of your favorite book store.'"

151 comments

  1. This sounds familiar... by Haedrian · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:This sounds familiar... by vossman77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds like Google is starting to fear the progress made my open street maps... http://www.openstreetmap.org/

    2. Re:This sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this raises the question, why would I want to help a proprietary map that will then be owned by Google, instead of helping the map that belongs to all of us? What we should do is contribute more to the OpenStreetMap project instead of Google Maps.

    3. Re:This sounds familiar... by moonbender · · Score: 2

      Is there anything preventing Google from using the OSM data itself in Google Maps? It used to be licensed CC-BY-SA, so it would be perfectly fine to embed it into Google Maps with correct attribution, in a similar fashion as the Wikipedia data. OSM is in a process of relicensing now, but I'd imagine the same would work with ODbL, too.

      The OSM data for my area is very detailed, including building outlines, landmarks, park benches, and dog poop dispensers (no kidding). Shame Google didn't opt for interoperability, could have been good for both Google and OSM -- maybe that's why they didn't do it. Or maybe they genuinely think they can do a better job. And maybe the OSM community is glad to be left alone. The official OSM map website sure could use some interface magic and a faster delivery network, though. The data is all there -- much more than is even visible in the default view -- but it's too hard and too slow to get there.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    4. Re:This sounds familiar... by Shompol · · Score: 1

      True, they blocked the Linux GPS software from using their maps, rendering my netbook with GPS unit useless. I can use OpenStreetMap, but that thing is not mature.

    5. Re:This sounds familiar... by Teancum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds like all of the fun that Gracenote did with the CDDB several years ago. A very much for-profit company who collected a ton of information from volunteers and then turned it into a for-profit business that screwed over the volunteers who couldn't even access the database for their own contributions without paying a licensing fee.

      I like Open Street Map, and that was my first thought when I heard that Google was letting volunteer contributions in. Google has in fact been a real pain in the behind to that project and does view it as the "competition".

    6. Re:This sounds familiar... by Capt.+Skinny · · Score: 2

      Because Google Maps needs less work. It's easier to get people to make small corrections to an already mature system than it is to get people to make fundamental contributions to something that doesn't meet their needs yet.

    7. Re:This sounds familiar... by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 2

      Why is this marked flamebait ? It could be true, I've noticed a lot of the free or cheap iPhone apps use Openstreetmaps' maps. It creates a base of people that benefit from making the maps ever more accurate. That has got to scare Google: maps is one of the levers they use, along with gmail, to differentiate their mobile platform from other platforms (and unlicensed Android versions)

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    8. Re:This sounds familiar... by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Informative

      Depends where you are. For some places in Europe, OSM is vastly more complete than Google, showing post boxes and rubbish bins. I'm about to leave for Tajikistan, and I see that there's very little detail there, but for how many users is that a problem?

    9. Re:This sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with openstreetmap you do not give your work to someone who will make money with it without giving you anything...

    10. Re:This sounds familiar... by Teancum · · Score: 2

      Is there anything preventing Google from using the OSM data itself in Google Maps?

      The OSM data license is an open-source license that would require Google to reciprocate and allow its map data to be used by the OSM project.... something that Google most definitely doesn't want to have happen. This is something where they can't have their cake and eat it too. If they displayed the OSM data as a "separate view" being a "community contribution view" that could in turn be put into the OSM database, sure.... they could do that.

      The issue really is over how users can reuse the licensed data. Google holds all of their data as completely proprietary and has even gone on record as willing to prosecute those who blatantly copy data from Google. A common mapmaker technique is to deliberately introduce errors into their maps (such as misnaming a certain street or adding in small details such as a non-existent park) where copying that data can be used as evidence of copyright infringement. If the map was generated from actually being there or knowing the local geography, such details won't be copied as they don't exist. There are such errors in the OSM data too (mostly accidental and can be corrected, but they are there) so this can go both ways.

    11. Re:This sounds familiar... by the_other_chewey · · Score: 1

      he OSM data for my area is very detailed, including building outlines, landmarks, park benches, and dog poop dispensers (no kidding).

      Ewwwwwww...

    12. Re:This sounds familiar... by bemymonkey · · Score: 1, Troll

      Because OSM and OSM based products suck. I wish they didn't, and I'd love to use them, but they're pretty much useless for anything real-world - at least here in Germany.

      I've tried a bunch of OSM based Android apps for both general mapping and navigation, and the maps just aren't up to par... crowdsourcing is great and all, but it's just not complete or detailed enough.

      Now adding to or correcting Google's maps... that I could see working...

    13. Re:This sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OSM is licensed with a share-alike licence, so if anyone mixes it with their data they would be forced to release their data as share-alike too. Google's motivation for having a map is a place to hang advertising on, which is where their money comes from. OSM's motivation is varied, but it leads to far, far more detail than Google needs. Google has already, mistakenly, used OSM data in their map data in the past. When it was pointed out they quickly reacted, removed the OSM data from their maps and apologised.

    14. Re:This sounds familiar... by swillden · · Score: 1

      dog poop dispensers

      You mean dogs? OSM must achieve a very high update rate to track all of them.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    15. Re:This sounds familiar... by richlv · · Score: 3

      very. hopefully people will discover osm and "upgrade" from google - with osm, you can get entire dataset and do nearly anything with it.

      several other mapping companies are contributing to osm - http://open.mapquest.com/, even http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/maps/archive/2010/08/02/bing-maps-adds-open-street-maps-layer.aspx (although the link in the latter seems to be broken right now :) )

      you can find other interesting uses of osm data here : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_based_Services

      of course, there's always the fact that "map maker" was available in multiple other countries before "opening" it for usa. which means others have had a chance to ask "why do this if there's osm" already ;) http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Kompa/diary/10047

      so i would like to invite everybody to join http://osm.org/ :)

      --
      Rich
    16. Re:This sounds familiar... by ScottMcD · · Score: 1
    17. Re:This sounds familiar... by richlv · · Score: 1

      as for the "map maker", i guess the issue is that google would like to get the edits of their users and not give them to anybody else, including the contributors themselves ;)

      the deliberate errors in maps, commonly known as copyright easter eggs, is a somewhat interesting topic with some history as well : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright_Easter_Eggs

      --
      Rich
    18. Re:This sounds familiar... by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      The OSM data license is an open-source license that would require Google to reciprocate and allow its map data to be used by the OSM project.... something that Google most definitely doesn't want to have happen.

      Actualy, as I understand it, Google buys a lot of their mapping info from, well, companies that specialize in mapping, as well as business info (for POI)... so it's probably not something they're even allowed to open source, in many cases...

    19. Re:This sounds familiar... by doom · · Score: 0

      Moderators: this is not flamebait. It's a pretty obvious comment: google is playing "me-too" with openstreetmap.org.

    20. Re:This sounds familiar... by killmenow · · Score: 1

      I don't know why YOU would want to help make/improve a proprietary map that will owned by Google. But I know why Anonymous would: penis jokes.

      This will happen.

    21. Re:This sounds familiar... by xaxa · · Score: 1

      True, they blocked the Linux GPS software from using their maps, rendering my netbook with GPS unit useless. I can use OpenStreetMap, but that thing is not mature.

      That depends where you live. Here in London OSM is generally better than Google Maps -- OSM includes many more footpaths, a better view of railway lines, bus stops, and often more shops.

    22. Re:This sounds familiar... by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Dammit! And with a "no kidding" no less. Well, I meant dog poop bag dispensers, if anybody was in doubt. Is there a shorter word for those?

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    23. Re:This sounds familiar... by moonbender · · Score: 1

      So if Google uses the OSM data as an overlay in Google Maps, it has to release its own mapping data? It doesn't seem all that clear cut, to me. After all, they "mix in" Wikipedia articles, apparently without issues. And release what, exactly, the vector geodata? The sat imagery? The "yellow pages" stuff like company names and adresses, customer ratings? Seems like determining when something is a derived work and where the derived work starts and ends is even more difficult than with free software.

      I hope the new license, ODbL, is fairly explicit in describing stuff like that.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    24. Re:This sounds familiar... by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

      Hey! That's a hard feature to implement. Those things move around all the time, chasing sticks, cars, squirrels, and what not! You try keeping your map updated.

    25. Re:This sounds familiar... by Teancum · · Score: 1

      As an overlay, I don't think that would be a problem. The issue is mixing in the mapping data and combining with non-open source mapping data and prohibiting derivative works from the end result. I don't see how Google could get that accomplished.

    26. Re:This sounds familiar... by Life2Death · · Score: 0

      They had editing of locations forever. I was confused why they didnt open their maps up because of how inaccurate some things are (thought still better than other map services, from my experience - not saying this is true everywhere)

    27. Re:This sounds familiar... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Actually it sounds more like they want advertising revenue from the book store and pizza parlour, even if those businesses didn't request advertising from google.

    28. Re:This sounds familiar... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Because OSM and OSM based products suck. I wish they didn't, and I'd love to use them, but they're pretty much useless for anything real-world - at least here in Germany.

      Your statement says more about Germany than OSM or Google.

    29. Re:This sounds familiar... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      One word: RFID.

    30. Re:This sounds familiar... by GumphMaster · · Score: 1

      How on Earth do they expect to keep dog poop dispenser locations up to date? They tend to be rather mobile.

      --
      Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    31. Re:This sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also known as "dogs".

    32. Re:This sounds familiar... by adolf · · Score: 1

      Ah, cool. Thanks for the links.

      I just noticed that http://open.mapquest.com/ includes some changes and deletions I made near my house a few months back. It is good to see that someone is actually trying to use the data I've provided, and seeing this encourages me to provide more updates to further make OSM match reality...while simultaneously discouraging me from playing with Google's new tools, which don't seem open at all.

    33. Re:This sounds familiar... by agentgonzo · · Score: 1

      ...and dog poop dispensers (no kidding)

      Forgive my ignorance, but isn't a dog-poop dispenser just a dog?

    34. Re:This sounds familiar... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Nope. In fact, Bing Maps do use OSM. They also make their imaging data available for tracing by OSM. Microsoft playing nice with a community effort, Google trying to replace it with a proprietary one - how did we get here?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    35. Re:This sounds familiar... by Herve5 · · Score: 1

      Indeed, my next GPS definitely will be based on Openstreetmap. Whatever the cost. Map upgrades will be free, and will incorporate all I personally added in.
      If in addition the hardware too could be "less monopoly" (ie, not Apple nor Android nor win-based) this would be perfect, alas, I fear I dream here -and moreover will be flamebait-modded by you android users ;-)

      --
      Herve S.
    36. Re:This sounds familiar... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      dog poop dispensers

      You really can get anything out of a vending machine these days...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    37. Re:This sounds familiar... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The data Google uses is licensed from mapping companies so they can't make it available for free in its native format, only present it as a rendered map or navigation instructions.

      I don't see how this is much different from YouTube or any other user-generated content site. You work for free producing valuable content, the site owner distributes it and makes money from advertising. Okay, here we have commercial data as a starting point, but the basic concept of getting people to do the hard work for free is the same.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    38. Re:This sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Google wanted to see how open streetmaps did. Looking at their success and the quality control they were able to maintain Google now feels comfortable with allowing major edits to be made my the userbase. Opensteetmaps uses Google Maps, Bing maps and Yahoo maps for a lot of its base data. Keep that in mind. What will assist in Google's success is the ability to link the eventual Place ID's created my the user created data with a Google AD request to the organizations which are now placed on the maps. It will also better their search results. When I type in Pizza and I am missing the local pizza joint from my search results then I feel my search has lost some credibility so obviously Google would want to correct this.

    39. Re:This sounds familiar... by richlv · · Score: 1

      changes usually appear on http://open.mapquest.com/ quite quickly, and that includes both rendering and searching. not too surprising, given that they employ some key osm project developers ;)

      --
      Rich
    40. Re:This sounds familiar... by Teancum · · Score: 1

      The issue here is that there is a fairly substantial project that has been explicitly generating map data under an open-source license (until very recently, they have been using CC-by-SA). That differs substantially with YouTube and other commercial companies showing user generated content because you are and must be permitted to obtain the original source material and be able to remix, reuse, and re-edit the data.

      If you mix the data from the OSM project, all of the data must also be available for reuse, including be available in its native format. That is the point, and the viral nature of the license. This is no different than the GPL and using GPL'd software in another software package. If you have some software using GPL'd subroutines (ignoring at the moment issues with LGPL), the entire software package must be GPL'd.

      The argument about contributions is mainly which kind of project would you want to work for: A company who claims copyright on all of your contributions and doesn't care about your opinions and feelings on the matter... even if you have spent literally years of your life building the database, or would your rather be a part of a community of volunteers where you do have a say in the direction of the data reuse policies and that you can continue to access your own contributions at a future date and are free to use the contributions of other volunteers for your own purposes... whatever those may be.

      For myself, I'd rather put the effort into an open source group that gives back to the world than working for free in a company that makes millions of dollars off of my volunteer efforts. Google can and likely will be sold to some multi-national conglomerate in the future (through a merger/acquisition, or some other pure business move) where the shareholders are only interested in one thing: How much money can you make for them. The purpose of those companies is to maximize profits and to increase shareholder equity. Why would you volunteer to help out an organization where that is their mission statement?

    41. Re:This sounds familiar... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I too would prefer it to be open. I am trying to develop technology for people to monitor traffic outside their homes and upload the data to a central database. We don't have very good traffic data in the UK. The technology is proving to be difficult though as it has to be both cheap and low power.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  2. What other info? by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Address and ratings for all the girls that put out? Sure, there is no way this can be abused...

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:What other info? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right.. that is why we can find out the addresses of all the camwhores on wikipedia right? Oh wai..

    2. Re:What other info? by Moraelin · · Score: 2

      Right.. that is why we can find out the addresses of all the camwhores on wikipedia right? Oh wai..

      I hope you also realize that Wikipedia is full of vandalisms. (E.g., I learned from there that iron is extracted from monkeys, the bridges of ancient Rome were manufactured in Japan, or that didgeridoos are cloned in test tubes. The last one actually had a whole page on the German Wikipedia for more than a year.) It's also full of idiots thinking that they're actually doing a favour to the world by changing stuff to something funny... only to themselves. It's full of half-baked mis-information, vanity edits of one's own pages or panning someone you don't like, edit wars that are won by the most persistent instead of the most informed, and occasional acts of personal vengeance. Like the recent case that was even on Slashdot, where some idiot who got panned way back on the Old Man Murray site, getting the page removed from Wiki. Or that for some people or events, the pages actually have to be locked, to stop the flood of crap edits.

      Frankly, the only reason why you don't have high school kids editing an ex-GF's wikipedia page to say "SHE'S A SLUT!!!" is because she doesn't have a page on Wikipedia.

      It's not only a Wiki problem. See Amazon reviews, and again a recent thread even on Slashdot where we even had lemmings defending their drivel flood as some great act of comedy. Never mind that they're not particularly funny, and not particularly helpful to have to wade through hundreds of such imaginary crap for a product to find an actual review. And again, praising one's own book or panning someone without even reading, actually do happen all the time. Or fanboy reviews hyping or panning something long before it's actually even available, but they already somehow know it will rule or suck.

      But generally, humans are humans for as long as we have a written history. Just about anywhere there even was a public board (of the actual wooden kind) or some statue, people have pinned anonymous or pseudepigraphic libel about people they don't like. See the talking statues of Rome in the 16'th century for example.

      So, yes, I do expect it to happen lots if every single house on Google can get such notes attached. The kind of people who only weren't defacing an ex-GF's/ex-BF's Wikipedia entry because she had none, now will be able to add exactly such notes to her/his house. And I expect a lot of them to do just that.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    3. Re:What other info? by bunratty · · Score: 1

      I added loose women's houses, geohashing locations I visited, places where I've slept, the trees I admire most, and tons of sidewalk graffiti sites, but those damn dirty deletionists removed them all! How can it be useful if they remove such critical information?

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    4. Re:What other info? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Address and ratings for all the girls that put out?

      Your mom will be added first, then, right?

    5. Re:What other info? by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 1
      Not to kill your great idea and all though. From the linked Google Blog:

      To confirm Map Maker user contributions are accurate, each edit will be reviewed. After approval, the edits will appear in Google Maps...

      There's still OpenStreetMaps for to try that on...

    6. Re:What other info? by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      "To confirm Map Maker user contributions are accurate, each edit will be reviewed. After approval, the edits will appear in Google Maps within minutes..."

      From the Google Blog entry...

    7. Re:What other info? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because all you're doing is submitting your parents' house over and over.

  3. please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    help us make money with free labor

  4. So by justmike2000 · · Score: 1

    So "Joe's Pizza" can now be changed to "Joe's Awful Pizza"?

    1. Re:So by kvvbassboy · · Score: 1

      Ratings and reviews already exist on Google Maps. You never use them?

    2. Re:So by justmike2000 · · Score: 1

      Yes but you cannot change the name...until now!

    3. Re:So by md65536 · · Score: 1

      So "Joe's Pizza" can now be changed to "Joe's Awful Pizza"?

      That's possible but highly unlikely.

      More likely, "Joe's Pizza" will now be changed to "PENUS PENUS PENUS PENUS PENUS PENUS PENUS PENUS".
      I didn't RTFA but will google be able to handle vandalization and misinformation? Will it be similar to wikipedia?

    4. Re:So by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Probably not, but you can finally say, "Hey Google, Joe's Pizza closed up shop a year ago, there's a pet store in there now!". That's something I've been missing sorely around here in Germany... hope we're able to do this soon.

  5. Former President-VICE Richard B. Cheney's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spider-hole is here.

    Cheers.

    Yours in Chelyabinsk,
    Kilgore Trout

  6. Oh, goody! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just can't wait to work for free for all of Google's shareholders!

  7. Finally? by Aldenissin · · Score: 1

    After submitting that they have my street name wrong and the next one over with it's label, and another one missing, years ago, I can just do it myself? This, this is just epic genius! I mean, that thought never went though my mind. Completely unobvious.

    --
    Like a city whose walls are broken down is a man who lacks self-control.
    1. Re:Finally? by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 2

      My street is one way, but Google Maps displays it one way in the wrong direction. I've submitted a report oh, about five years ago, and still no change. I'm looking forward to opening this up for Hungary as well, so I can make that goddamn change, since it breaks all routes planned by Maps.

      --
      Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
    2. Re:Finally? by oakgrove · · Score: 2

      After submitting that they have my street name wrong and the next one over with it's label, and another one missing, years ago,

      That's strange. I submitted a correction for two streets where I live that had the names mixed up and about a month later, they sent me an email thanking me and the switch was made. OSM had the same error (must have came from the Tiger data) and I just fixed it myself. Not sure why your change wasn't made to GM.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    3. Re:Finally? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. This should have been done years ago. Sometimes I can't sleep at night, knowing that something or someone is wrong or incorrect on the Internet.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    4. Re:Finally? by Aldenissin · · Score: 1

      If you only knew how many people pulled onto the wrong street since it is hard to see form the road, you'd understand why I would at least like maps to be correct.

      --
      Like a city whose walls are broken down is a man who lacks self-control.
    5. Re:Finally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, all routes that require somebody to go down your street, at least.

    6. Re:Finally? by cusco · · Score: 1

      After submitting that they have my street name wrong and the next one over with it's label, and another one missing, years ago, I can just do it myself? This, this is just epic genius! I mean, that thought never went though my mind. Completely unobvious.

      I just wish that we could fix bad labels on Google Earth. I've sent a couple of emails telling them that they've misspelled Paruro, Peru, and that the locations of a couple of nearby villages are wrong, but neither is fixed yet.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    7. Re:Finally? by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Ob xkcd

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    8. Re:Finally? by Cwix · · Score: 1

      I emailed them with a pdf map of all the bike routes in my city, and they had the map updated a few months later with a nice email thanking me. Yea a few months isnt great turnaround but the fact that they have a much more complete map of the bike trails was a big plus to me.

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    9. Re:Finally? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      They all do! He's the guy that built that baseball diamond in his corn field!

    10. Re:Finally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may also have to do with the significance of the impact of the change. You don't like accidental tourists coming down your street.

      I, on the other hand, submitted a change because they had the Exchange Place light rail station in Jersey City, NJ clear on the other side of the city from its actual location. I submitted an error report, backed it up with a street view URL that proved to them where the station was actually located, and explained to them that since they have both NJ Transit's Light Rail and the Port Authority's PATH schedules loaded into their transit system, they were doing eco-minded travelers a disservice by falsely convincing people to not take the light rail to the PATH train. They quickly realized the significance of that error and moved the icon for the light rail station to its rightful location half a block away from the PATH station stop of the same name.

      That being said, I can't get them to move the icons for the multiple train lines servicing Trenton Transit Center in NJ any closer together -- and yes, I understand that's really the agencies' fault, not theirs, but they should at least try. I also can't get them to change the fact that their algorithm seems to think it only takes 6 minutes to cross the street from the SEPTA 127 bus when catching a NJ Transit train but **33** minutes to cross the same street from the same bus into the same train station when catching an Amtrak train. Add to that the 30 minute lead time that Amtrak builds into the schedule planning and you have a complete and utter disaster when trying to plan a trip from Bucks County, PA to Manhattan using only mass transit. Add to THAT the fact that Amtrak trains will almost always blow away NJ Transit trains in terms of ride times from Trenton to NY, and you'll quickly see that trip planning with Google Maps from Bucks County to New York City has been pretty much gutted for a while now. Its fixable. It just sucks pretty bad right now.

      I guess they do have a weird way of determining what qualifies as an "important" fix.

    11. Re:Finally? by Americano · · Score: 1

      Saving a handful of people the trouble of a u-turn or a three-point turn when they realize they made a wrong turn? This is truly god's work, friend.

      It's often overlooked in favor of high-profile "causes" like "feeding and clothing the poor" and "providing quality medical care to people who've never had it" and (it's okay to roll your eyes) "childhood education." But it's just as important - perhaps even MORE important, in fact!

      Did you know: In the last days of her life, Mother Teresa was overheard to remark, "If only I hadn't wasted my time in India, I could have donated time to something truly worthy, like OpenStreetMaps." You can look it up, I bet Wikipedia will back me up on this. If not, there's some sort of equally truthy information about her somewhere in her Wikipedia entry, you can bet on it.

      The crowdsourcing phenomenon has taught me that fifty million Elvis fans really CAN'T be wrong.

    12. Re:Finally? by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Helping people avoid wrong turns reduces traffic on the streets that were incorrectly referred, which has potential to increase pedestrian safety (as there are less cars traveling). It saves drivers time and frustration. It seems like it's a universally good thing - why do you ridicule it? Do you also ridicule people that pick up litter, or volunteer as crossing guards?

      The guy isn't making a crusade of it, he just wants less people to (mistakenly) turn onto his street. Seems pretty understandable. As a driver, I'd prefer not to get sent down his street (or anyone else's) by mistake either.

    13. Re:Finally? by richlv · · Score: 1
      --
      Rich
    14. Re:Finally? by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      Why are you posting to /. instead of helping to feed and clothe the poor, or campaigning for better childhood education?

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    15. Re:Finally? by Americano · · Score: 1

      I suspect for the same reasons you're posting to /., instead of helping to feed and cloth the poor, or campaigning for better childhood education - humans tend to be shallow, self-absorbed narcissists, and often need a kick in the ass to jolt them out of their narrow frame of reference to gather some perspective. I make no claim that I'm immune to this tendency. I have several exes who would also gleefully tell you that I can be a prick, so if you absolutely must feel that you're not subject to the same foibles, there's your consolation prize.

      The apparent difference is, I'm able to notice, and laugh about it, when I see it happen to myself, or in others. Not everything we do is "suprsrsbsns." Taking the time to complain on Slashdot about how someone has "Finally" introduced this functionality, complete with smug condescension over how trivially obvious the idea was years ago, and how "if we only knew how many people" made a wrong turn, we'd understand how important this really was... well, it's apparent that somebody's got an inflated sense of the importance of this issue in the world, and I find that amusing.

      If "bad online maps" is an issue that keeps you up nights, you're in sore need of perspective. You're certainly free to criticize me for poking fun, but consider this fair warning - I'll probably just be amused by your frowning disapproval, as well.

    16. Re:Finally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      S-S-S-STRAWMAN

    17. Re:Finally? by Chuq · · Score: 1

      Without knowing Hungary at all i found a major omission in about 2 minutes ..

      http://tools.geofabrik.de/mc/?mt0=mapnik&mt1=googlemap&lon=19.3174&lat=47.55&zoom=13

      --
      - Chuq
    18. Re:Finally? by Aldenissin · · Score: 1

      Damnit, it's almost 6 in the morning and I can't sleep. I just knew some asshole was gonna keep me up tonight on /. because he was a douche and I had to correct him.

      It isn't about a 3 point turn, it's about it's hard to find the fucking road, even though it is right there, and people get confused. People have crossed over a ditch on foot several times to knock on my door, looking for the road that I live on.... I know you don't give a shit about people saving hassle knowing where they are going but those that read maps... they do. I know it really ain't that big of a deal. Unless you are using a map....

      And it wasn't smugness, it was sarcasm, tool. I'm glad they did this, and I was just poking fun. Lighten up.

      --
      Like a city whose walls are broken down is a man who lacks self-control.
  8. Hope Google will implement a decent offline map by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    All that talk about not being evil is all fine and dandy. But how come Android does not have a decent off line map application? They say Google maps works fine in iPad/iPhone. But in Android, if you don't have a data plan, it simply does not work [*]

    GPS is free. In fact first few phones with GPS were totally offline operations with the maps cached locally not forcing a data plan. But pretty quickly the carriers and hand set makers colluded to make it non workable and they all peddle dataplans at various levels. That Google is also aiding and abetting these nickel and diming makes me mad. Mind you, I have been as anti-Microsoft and as fanboi-yi Google as anyone in slashdot. I am not really looking for turn by turn navigation etc. Simply get directions while on WiFi, cache all the intervening map tiles, fuel stops, restaurants, hotels along the way. Just locate me on the map with GPS. That is all I ask for. But you can't get it in Android without a data plan. Some app called MapDroyd is rated to be the best for offline GPS on Android. It does not work well.

    So people contributing to crowd sourced maps should demand that Google release a decent working version of offline google maps for Android, on par with iOS versions.

    [*] Yes, there are many reasons to have an Android phone without a data plan. WiFi calling helps you avoid international roaming charges. WiFi connection painlessly syncs your calender, to do list and contacts with gmail. Android forces the handset makers to use standard USB chargers. You can get a low end Android with these benefits for about the same price as a well equipped non smart phone. Of course, high end Android might not make sense without a data plan.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Hope Google will implement a decent offline map by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      In the linux world there is the interesting TangoGPS and it's fork FoxtrotGPS

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    2. Re:Hope Google will implement a decent offline map by AJH16 · · Score: 1

      There are offline packages you can get for Android. Unfortunately I can only confirm they exist. I had looked in to them some but never found a free one and I have a data plan so I didn't care to pay for the ability to use it offline. I thought one of the big companies made an Android based app that is even available on the market place.

      --
      AJ Henderson
    3. Re:Hope Google will implement a decent offline map by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But how come Android does not have a decent off line map application? That is all I ask for.

      One reason: because you, and millions of others like you, supported this with your dollars/euros/yen/rubles/pesos. You bought the very thing you are now complaining about.

      I bought a more open phone than Android or iOS, and it has an offline mapping app that does exactly what you ask for. I can download and cache tiles when i'm on my home 802.11, and use it offline later. I have a large region around my house (about 250x160km) cached at moderate resolution, and the places I'm likely to travel at higher resolution. SD cards offer cheap storage for this data.

      But we must live with artificial restrictions and loss of consumer control over our own devices because of people like you who give money to support that loss of control. Thanks a lot for that.

    4. Re:Hope Google will implement a decent offline map by Minwee · · Score: 1

      But how come Android does not have a decent off line map application?

      Maybe you should have bought a Nokia instead. Their Ovi Maps application works entirely offline, can be updated through USB, and is free to boot.

      Pity the rest of their software sucks, but at least the maps are good.

    5. Re:Hope Google will implement a decent offline map by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I use MapDroyd all the time. It's not perfect, but it uses a fraction of the power (battery) used by Google Maps, and I can look at it on the Underground (no signal) before I get above-ground, or use it abroad (no signal because of roaming). It also enabled me to get back to the hotel when I took the wrong night bus in Slovakia.

      http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MapDroyd

      Of course, to be any use you need to have decent OSM data. Fortunately, most European towns I've been to do (some are better than Google etc).

    6. Re:Hope Google will implement a decent offline map by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Navit.

    7. Re:Hope Google will implement a decent offline map by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      Pity the rest of their software sucks, but at least the maps are good.

      You know, if you wanted that, there's these things on the market called "GPS Navigators"...

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    8. Re:Hope Google will implement a decent offline map by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the linux world there is the interesting TangoGPS and it's fork FoxtrotGPS

      And its predecessor WhiskeyGPS?

    9. Re:Hope Google will implement a decent offline map by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      There are also some decent OSM apps. I have one on my ancient N80. It's a J2ME thing. You run a desktop Java app, select a rectangle on the map, and it generates a J2ME app embedding that data. It can also integrate with the GPS if your device has one or you have an external bluetooth one. If your device allows J2ME apps to use the filesystem (mine doesn't), then you can also just copy maps across to it separately, and it can grab them from the Internet itself if you have signal (generally, when I need a map, I don't). It always impresses me how Apple and Google can create new and exciting devices that lack the basic functionality that I've been using for years on a cheap and old device.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  9. Say goodbye to favorite places ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    There is both a good and a bad side to this. Ignoring the wikipedia type abuse that will occur it will probably be a net good, however say goodbye to favorite places that only locals or a few know about. Someone will put it on Google.

    Ever discover a good side road that works to get around traffic? A friend and I who carpooled found one. One day a radio station started a segment where people could call in with traffic tips. Someone glowing described this wonderful detour. The next day it was as stalled and backed up as the highway. Years later I went that way again, still as screwed up. I suspect this sort of thing to happen with various other kind of favorite spots.

    On the "plus side" parents will probably easily find out where the kids hang out, party, etc.

    1. Re:Say goodbye to favorite places ... by vlm · · Score: 2

      Ever discover a good side road that works to get around traffic? A friend and I who carpooled found one. One day a radio station started a segment where people could call in with traffic tips. Someone glowing described this wonderful detour. The next day it was as stalled and backed up as the highway. Years later I went that way again, still as screwed up. I suspect this sort of thing to happen with various other kind of favorite spots.

      Works both ways. There is a truly major interstate highway project in my area, biggest in a couple decades, maybe the biggest project since the interstate was built decades ago. The conventional wisdom is the interstate will therefore be a parking lot during rush hour, so take any possible non-interstate route home, avoid the interstate at all costs, its the inter-apocalypse, etc. The actual result is the interstate is a ghost town and I get home about 5 to 10 minutes earlier than normal now, even though the road is all screwed up.

      You should call in to the same radio show crying about how the alt route is a clogged dirt road to nowhere, until no one uses it anymore.

      The sheep will follow their orders...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Say goodbye to favorite places ... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Now you're talking more Br'er Rabbit than Tom Sawyer.

  10. Thanks but not interested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Terms of service for the submissions:

    By submitting User Submissions to the Service, you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display, distribute, and create derivative works of the User Submission.

    Yet I can't use Google maps or the maps API for most things I'd like to use them for (basically saving anything locally is forbidden and the API use is forbidden for everything except showing things on Google Maps).

    TL;DR: Thanks but I'll stick with Openstreetmap.

  11. donate your time for free to make $ for others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Or, you could donate it to http://www.openstreetmap.org/ instead.

  12. Google is the 800 lb gorilla ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    ... why would I want to help a proprietary map that will then be owned by Google, instead of helping the map [OpenStreetMap project] that belongs to all of us? ...

    Because Google is the 800 lb gorilla with money and brand name recognition. People know and trust it, its motto is do no evil, why are you worried?

  13. For teh lulz by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 0

    Can't wait to see what the 4chan / Anon crowds dream up.

    1. Re:For teh lulz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will sure make them a lot more dangerous, if they can simply label your house as "Pedophile lives here!!11!" and some vigilantes of sub-average intelligence read it.

    2. Re:For teh lulz by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      It does this old man some good to see 4chan and the phrase " vigilantes of sub-average intelligence" used in the same discussion thread.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  14. Google is Today's Tom Sawyer by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    (apologies to Rush...)

    "Hey y'all, don't you wish you could be white washing this here picket fence? I gotta great job, betcha you wish you could be spending the afternoon white washing this here fence, you suckers..."

    Seriously, Sergei (and you, too, Arianna. Especially You!) people work for you, you pay them. This Judy Garland/Mickey Rooney "Hey, kids, let's put on a show in my grandma's barn, we can call it 'User Generated Content!'" shit has gone about as far as it can and should go.

    1. Re:Google is Today's Tom Sawyer by Gr33nJ3ll0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or maybe "Geez it would be nice to be able to spent 15 sec fixing that road segment that always results in google maps routing me around, which wastes 10 minutes of my day" Having worked with city and county mapping services there are a lot of little mistakes on maps that a simple tweak could easily fix. OTOH, if you don't want to, don't do it.

    2. Re:Google is Today's Tom Sawyer by Synon · · Score: 2

      You're just upset because your parents never got you a sandbox when you were a kid, I understand. User generated content can and will go much much further. A simple project like "Accurately label every location of interest in the US" is a big much, even for google. And people benefit from such a map, so why wouldn't they spend a couple minutes to make a correction to their favorite businesses?

    3. Re:Google is Today's Tom Sawyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're traveling that direction often, why do you need to follow google maps to get there? Even if it's variations on a theme, ignore the directions for the places you know, then use them to get the last 20% which you don't know.

      Blindly following (GPS|Mapquest|Google Maps|Whatever) is a bad idea, always. Use common sense, don't be stupid.

    4. Re:Google is Today's Tom Sawyer by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

      Or to their own business. Updating information around their location wouldn't be a bad idea for many store owners. Google Places is also very useful.

    5. Re:Google is Today's Tom Sawyer by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      I try really really hard not to reply to AC ... but the answer is "because other people will benefit". Enlightened Self Interest. Know it, practise it.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    6. Re:Google is Today's Tom Sawyer by 517714 · · Score: 2

      Gaming of the system is the next logical step. One might be able to route people to one's neighborhood by submitting false one-way streets, road closures, altered speed limits, and traffic jam reports.

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    7. Re:Google is Today's Tom Sawyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Google is today's Tom Sawyer.
      But OSM users are Today's Tom Sawyer.

      Notice the subtle distinction... lyrical references are what happens when you actually listen to lyrics -- gross misappropriation is when you just grab snippets of words without a clue.

    8. Re:Google is Today's Tom Sawyer by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I can see this falling into the same trap as the Street View removal procedure - people can abuse it to harm their competitors.

      On Street View if you find a competitors shop, point the cursor at the flat above it or the car parked in front of it and claim that it is yours Google will remove it. No checking, they just take your word for it. Now if someone looks up their address and wants to see an image of the shop front they can't. Similarly you can now make subtle alterations to the maps that will result in people finding it harder to get to your competitors place of business. Maybe throw in a one way street or put a marker saying "loading only parking" nearby.

      At least others will be able to fix the maps, with Street View there is no way to contest image removal.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  15. Name Change by Troke · · Score: 1

    A1 Awesome Bestest Chinese Restaraunt

  16. Buy a Garman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why I bought a Garman. Lot's cheaper and faster than streaming maps. (Hint! It also works where there is no cell service.) Doesn't interfer with using your phone either if you wish to make a phone call. Dah.

    1. Re:Buy a Garman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the up-side of buying a German is - they're always right.

    2. Re:Buy a Garman by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      But I always seem to end up in Poland.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  17. Has everyone forgotten CDDB? by awilden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OpenStreetMaps is a classic grass-roots effort. People have sweat blood making OSM work, proving the "business" model, working out the kinks, and donating immeasurable time towards making this a success. Now that somebody has done the dirty work to prove that this method of crowd-sourcing maps can work, Google trots out its sexy service that will grab the buzz, divert the resources, advertise interest away and steal the user cycles towards improving its own closed proprietary maps. Yes, that's correct, proprietary -- there's no guarantee that what you do will remain freely available.

    Has everyone forgotten the CDDB debacle? Quoting wiki: "The original software behind CDDB was released under the GNU General Public License, and many people submitted CD information thinking the service would also remain free." Those of you who remember will recognize what an understatement that is. Needless to say, those users were wrong and one day they found that all their effort was suddenly swallowed up and they were being asked to pay for access to the data they submitted.

    I don't believe Google is evil and I don't work with OSM, but if Google is not evil it has to realize the negative impacts its actions can have on the kinds of grassroots open-source efforts it claims to support. Google is not stepping in to use its resources to do what the crowd cannot -- it will end up undercutting a project where the crowd was doing just fine on its own. And the ordinary Joes need to realize what is going on and channel their efforts to the project where they will own the product. OpenStreetMap.

    1. Re:Has everyone forgotten CDDB? by blair1q · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Has everyone forgotten CDDB? by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      I don't believe Google is evil and I don't work with OSM, but if Google is not evil it has to realize the negative impacts its actions can have on the kinds of grassroots open-source efforts it claims to support.

      I once interviewed for a job at Google. Made it through 13 rounds. During interview #14, I was pontificating on the "don't be evil" mantra and suggested that, even without evil intent, the reverberating effects of radical changes in technology shouldn't be ignored. I said something along the lines that I'm sure that Google could come up with a way to offer absolutely free web hosting--no Geocities-esque banners or anything--and absolutely kill hundreds or thousands of small service vendors overnight.

      The interviewer's words were, "That's an interesting insight." But the look on his face was, "And how is it our problem that these other vendors can't keep up?"

      And they never called back after that.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    3. Re:Has everyone forgotten CDDB? by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      Now that somebody has done the dirty work to prove that this method of crowd-sourcing maps can work,

      Mapmaker has been available outside the US in countries with more limited map data for years now - I worked on mapping parts of semi-rural India. The tools on OSM are good, better than Google's in many ways, but Google Maps does have a certain weight of presence. If putting in a minor update here or there helps people who use Google Maps by default (e.g., Android Navigation users), what is wrong with that?

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
  18. It does by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    All that talk about not being evil is all fine and dandy. But how come Android does not have a decent off line map application?

    http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Android has several, including osmand.

    As for your complaints about Google Maps not having an offline mode and whining about a cabal between Google and the carriers - on Android, it caches map data which is now vector-based, not prerendered tiles. They were waiting for device processors speeds and 3D abilities to become suitable. If you travel in the same area again, data from the cache is used. You can scroll around an area you intend to travel, too, to preload the data.

    Newsflash: carriers, like power, gas, and water companies - are most interested in conservation, because it means more customers on the same infrastructure.

  19. Stephen Colbert is Probably Already Working On It! by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Let's see, where would you find elephants on the map? Oh, right, Google says they're located at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, 20006, and the population of them has tripled in the last few years since Barnum and Bailey came to town.

    It's easy enough to confirm - just look at all the geotagged photos on Flickr and Google that show circus tents and elephants out front.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  20. take, take and more take. where's the give? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google: So I use my own time and effort and contribute to the quality of your map data. What do I get out of it? Do I get freely usable map data?

    Ahhhh. I didn't think so.

    I'll keep contributing to openstreemap.org thanks. Now if only there was quality navigation software (for Android) with quality POI data to go with it.

  21. Didn't they always? by blair1q · · Score: 1

    Google Maps has had a "report a problem" link for years.

    Not that it ever did a lick of good. But it was there.

    1. Re:Didn't they always? by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      I've used it 3 times and was contacted within 2 days (not automated, it was from a person). Correction made within 1-2 weeks.

      1) Misspelling of my street name in google maps resulted in it being impossible to search for
      2) Streetview pointing at a "highway" that was actually just forest (the exit was a few hundred feet back)
      3) Fixing street name at a new address.

    2. Re:Didn't they always? by ebs16 · · Score: 1

      For a while, there was a "Report Error" link in Google Maps Navigation for Android that allowed you to submit a 15-second audio message describing the error. I submitted a few in the NYC-metro area and received emails a few months later letting me know that I was right and that my changes were committed to the map.

      I'm not sure if Android-nav submissions are processed separately from the Google Maps browser client, but there are people on the other end for at lease some of their user correction features.

    3. Re:Didn't they always? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      I never got any result. It will still route you through an underpass that was never built (it's just an old road dead-ending into the berm they built for the interstate) and through a locked gate to private land that's shown as a through-road. Not a good deal, since in both cases you have to backtrack significantly (7 miles in the latter case) to get to a usable route.

  22. Didn't Google try this once already? by Animats · · Score: 2

    Didn't Google have a thing about two years ago where people could photograph storefronts, send them in to Google, and get paid?

    They have a "submit your content" thing now, but of course Google doesn't actually pay for the content.

  23. So I can finally fix the Mall of America? by d'fim · · Score: 1

    The Holiday "station-store" at the Mall of America doesn't actually have gasoline, and I'm tired of it showing up when I'm searching for gas stations.

    Does this mean I can actually fix it with some faint hope that the fix will actually stay fixed?

    --
    Adherence to the truth is a form of disloyalty.
    1. Re:So I can finally fix the Mall of America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    2. Re:So I can finally fix the Mall of America? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes -- for sufficiently small values of "faint".

      FTFY

  24. Awesome by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    My property should be about 20 times bigger than they show it.

    The changes here will be definitive, right?

  25. Re:Or by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Well, it depends. Is the CIA agent hot, and will she wear leather?

  26. Been like this for a while. by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

    A while back I added the hours for a business near where I live (their schedule is a little bit odd - they're only open Wednesday-Saturday). And you've always been able to report a problem with the map, as long as I can remember (although I don't think in some countries it allows that).

  27. nobombism catching on in southern hillary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the newly appointed spiritual leader of the southern hillarians, genuine native american elder, ralph, suggests that those still living above the surface also investigate improved leadership soon, as the hackers have reported that the chosen neogods are continuing to fire all of their guns at once &... like a true nature's child, ralph was born not to be wild.. he also suggests reading the teepeeleaks etchings, where real history & the truth make god, & some of our early 'explorers' look truly merciless. & it's (genocide) happened before & since, behaviors the natives don't even have words for in their language yet. reality sucks.. the wind out of seemingly endless fatal deception. disarm

  28. Work for Google for free by Sloppy · · Score: 2

    Sure, you don't get paid, but at least you get the satisfaction and sense of accomplishment that comes from seeing someone else's stock price rise.

    Ok, so you won't be allowed to directly query the data yourself after you give it to them, but at least you'll know that it might come up on your page, along with their ads, if you embed their javascript.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  29. Could use some work by afidel · · Score: 1

    We have 3 building on our HQ campus, I went in to outline each building and tag it with the appropriate address to make it easier for people to find the correct building when they visit the campus. There's no apparent way to do that as you have to specify a type of business when you select the drawing tool and none of the categories fit.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Could use some work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. "Building" seems to be an appropriate category for a building.

  30. Way to go by Stavr0 · · Score: 1

    You done broke it.

    Slashdotted that is.

  31. New for USA by Av8rjoker · · Score: 1

    Map Maker has been around for years and has been active in over 180 countries since then. It just finally opened up to the USA.

  32. Pretty much certain by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    Damn right I know my neighborhood better.

    Yes, google maps. I am certain that my ex girlfriend lives on Whore Avenue.

    And my boss does happen to live on Penis Street.

    --
    -Styopa
  33. Been done for years now... Wikimapia by markana · · Score: 1

    Exactly how is this different from Wikimapia (http://wikimapia.org)? That's a community-driven map-places-editing site that's been active for several years now...

    1. Re:Been done for years now... Wikimapia by j-beda · · Score: 1

      Does Wikipapia get its map data from Google? Too bad they don't seem to use http://openstreetmap.org/

  34. Link to the Blog Post by pgn674 · · Score: 1

    Instead of linking to the Official Google Blog homepage, it would be better to link to the relevant blog post: Official Google Blog: Add your local knowledge to the map with Google Map Maker for the United States

  35. Painted Doorstops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " ... For example, you can fix the name of your local pizza parlor, or add a description of your favorite book store. ... '"

    ... or you your favorite heimatsschutz roadblock, ICE dissimulated detention facility, gang cemetery, pickup corner, chop-shop, crack complex ...

    The possbilities are endless - and inspiring. And need not be limited to that named after the finite but innumerable cipher (or would that be - uncountable?).

    Reminds one of the WWII invasion of Scandinavia, for some strange reason, or other.

  36. go on suckers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    update their maps and still be forbidden to use it offline.

  37. Still no help by pjbgravely · · Score: 1

    There is still no designation for seasonal roads, and truck trails which Google maps and most GPS's send people down to get stuck in the winter and spring.

    --
    Star Trek, there maybe hope.
  38. location data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish they'd let us correct the cell/wi-fi location database so my location on maps.google would be plausible without gps.

  39. Really, "dog poop dispensers?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, "dog poop dispensers?"

    I hope they also include data about dog poop waste bag dispensers so that people can dispose of the dispensed dog poop decisively! LOL! ;-)

  40. Women Lingerie by krishna12 · · Score: 0

    Awesome post! This is really cool site and it has a lot of useful information posted here

  41. P90X Workout by Iris15 · · Score: 0

    Your personal trainer Shaun T will help you to make you more ber and beautiful.You just join the insanity workout .Our website offer you the

    insanity DVD ,so you don’t think too much.If you want to buy insanity workout .Welcome to our website to get the cheap insanity workout.After 90 daysof the p90x workout and nutrition plan,you can lost your weight and make you more ber and health.This a good chance for you,so don’t hesitate,just action now.Welcome to our p90x website to get the free p90x . The p90x on sale now . P90x workout schedule has been designed by Tony Horton, who is well known fitness instructor. The workout Schedule :Follow The P90X Workout To Get Amazing Result In 90 Days! The P90x workout program is not like any other diet or exercise program you've ever tried. I’m sure you’re here for a P90X schedule and we’ll get right to it. P90x schedule is a very challenging program devised by Tony Horton. Just do it, it’s your best choice!

  42. familiar, not so by Herve5 · · Score: 1

    I'm a bit worried, but from your wikipedia ref, about Gracenote "many listing contributors believed that the database was open-source", which it never was.

    Openstreetmap is.

    You can even, like me, enter the supporting Foundation: rather than just donating, you'll get some control, you'd be able to vote against openness change if it ever comes (currently, the recent licence evolutions are definitely towards more openness in fact)

    But indeed, OSM is geared so that legally speaking, each single streetpoint you may add cannot but be open, with a CC-BY-SA Creative common license.
    This is *intended* so that no one, nowhere, never can buy or sell OSM data.

    Within a few years, like the large, private and costly encyclopedias did in front of Wikipedia, the private GPS map resellers will slowly vanish.

    (and now I'll be modded fanboi -but I stand by ;-)

    --
    Herve S.
    1. Re:familiar, not so by Teancum · · Score: 1

      I have been an OSM contributor myself, and I'm sorry if I implied that the OSM volunteers and organizers are seeking to make a profit off of their activities... at least following the Gracenote fiasco path.

      I agree that legally speaking the OSM license is such that the data generated can't reshaped into a proprietary license. There were many contributors to the CDDB that thought the database being generated was open sourced and that was implied while it was being developed... at least until it was too late to make a big difference. Many in the open source community get wary about those who would try to do that kind of thing again.

      I like your analogies to other on-line encyclopedias (Encarta, Britannica, and others) to Wikipedia. It is quite fitting, although the OSM projects is going to take a fair bit more time before that happens. I see something similarly happening with Google, although there the analogy is perhaps better compared to the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy project where that although there are good intentions and an organization involved who is sympathetic to the community as a whole, divergent interests are present where eventually this volunteer effort will fall apart. It is Google's effort that you have to question here, even if they promote "competition" to the OSM effort after a fashion. I wouldn't trust Google, at least so far as always being so friendly to the open source mapping community, or even hosting the service in the long term.

  43. Which phone and which carrier? by tepples · · Score: 1

    I bought a more open phone than Android or iOS

    Which phone was it, and which United States carrier do you recommend for use with it?

  44. Users didn't want to manually download map data by tepples · · Score: 1

    But how come Android does not have a decent off line map application?

    Because most Android-powered devices sold in the United States are mobile telephones, not PDA/PMP devices such as Archos 43. Devices without a cellular radio are more likely to not have a GPS receiver either. They're also likely to run AOSP Android, which doesn't come with Android Market, instead of OHA Android, which does. As for using a phone with only a voice plan and no data plan, only recently have those become available in the United States. The United States market is relevant because it is the home of Google, Slashdot, and tepples.

    GPS is free.

    The receiver is not, and storage and bandwidth for a set of map data for the entire United States is not.

    In fact first few phones with GPS were totally offline operations with the maps cached locally not forcing a data plan. But pretty quickly the carriers and hand set makers colluded to make it non workable

    This probably happened because end users didn't want to manually download map data for individual cities before traveling there.