Slashdot Mirror


Don't Expect an OpenOffice/LibreOffice Merger

Since Oracle has decided to give OpenOffice back to the community, a lot of people wondered if there would be some sort of re-unification with the ex-Oracle and the Document Foundation run by a lot of the original involved folks. The latter has released a statement saying, "the development of TDF community and LibreOffice is going forward as planned, and we are always willing to include new members and partners. We will provide as many information as we can with the progress of the situation. We are currently making every possible effort to offer a smooth transition to the project."

33 of 192 comments (clear)

  1. Re:It is not OpenOffice by Goaway · · Score: 2

    So after all that work of building up a brand with the horribly awkward name "OpenOffice.org", now they're going to throw it all away and try to get an even more awkward name accepted.

    They must like a challenge.

  2. What? by somersault · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why would I expect a merger? It feels like they only forked a couple of months ago.

    --
    which is totally what she said
    1. Re:What? by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Why would I expect a merger? It feels like they only forked a couple of months ago.

      I'm trying to recall ... didn't they strip out a bunch of functionality due to ownership issues?

      They might put that back in if they actually did strip it in the first place ... I think not having a bunch of different free/open/libre/emancipated/shiny/awesome-Office suites might make for less confusion over all. It certainly might ensure that people actually get a viable alternative to Microsoft Office.

      Because, really ... "honestly mom, you should change to Libre Office, that Open Office from 2 years ago is so passe" ... I just don't see that helping the cause of coming up with a free alternative. I'm not really willing to go there for myself even.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:What? by icebike · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Exactly right.

      Further more, everybody who mattered in the developer base already bailed out of Oracle, and is working for LibreOffice. There is very little that Oracle has left to merge.

      Oracle has thrown in the towel, (but you can rest assured there will be a few poison pills in anything they release that is not already in LibreOffice) and at best the open-sourcing of this project is their way of telling the remaining developers on their payroll, "here's your hat, what's your hurry". Those that didn't leave probably didn't because they needed the pay check.

      Point, Set, and Match to LibreOffice. This is probably one of the most significant watershed events in Open Source development. Even more so than when XFree86 was forked and Xorg totally took over X servers on every distribution, leaving XFree86 into obscurity.

      That being said, the article title does NOT square with the source, which makes no blanket statements about NO possible merger. I read it completely the opposite way, they will accept new members, and they may well cherry pick the released code.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    3. Re:What? by icebike · · Score: 2

      I'm trying to recall ... didn't they strip out a bunch of functionality due to ownership issues?

      I think it was mostly look and feel items, and dead unused code.

      OOo had actually not gained much (some say it lost quite a bit) from the days when it was StarOffice. Significant portions of the large document (read: book sized) management capabilities, (pagination, cross-references, document linking and embedding, table and illustration management, etc), actually deteriorated significantly once Sun and Oracle took over.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    4. Re:What? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, LibreOffice has several features that the newest OpenOffice.org lacks. Sun/Oracle dragged their feet on accepting contributions from outsiders. Part of this was due to the fact that Sun/Oracle wanted to charge money for certain features, part was simple Not Invented Here syndrome. Either way, when LibreOffice split off from OpenOffice.org it was already the better fork.

      Now that LibreOffice has shown that it can organize a community, set up the needed infrastructure, and make a release that is better than Oracle's release Oracle is starting to get concerned about what this says about Oracle's ability to lead in other Free Software communities. Larry Ellison paid a lot of money for Sun's various Free Software businesses, and he does *not* want people getting the idea that these communities would be better off if they were forked away from Oracle.

    5. Re:What? by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because, really ... "honestly mom, you should change to Libre Office, that Open Office from 2 years ago is so passe" ... I just don't see that helping the cause of coming up with a free alternative. I'm not really willing to go there for myself even.

      And all this time, I have been just installing the software and renaming the icons Word, Excel, and so on. I didn't realize I was supposed to tell them the name of the programs as well as they weren't using the Microsoft versions.

    6. Re:What? by countertrolling · · Score: 2

      Not so. Negative mods attract attention also. This is why I suspect they removed the descriptors from the first time a comment gets modded. Since ACs can only get modded down once, it helps to make it go unnoticed.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    7. Re:What? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2

      No: it tells you he has used Oracle products before, and has not yet recovered his composure. Some people never do!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    8. Re:What? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      Anything which was free before Oracle is going to be better off forked from Oracle.

      I agree with you. Unfortunately, for Oracle at least, most of the software, and all of the really interesting software, that Oracle bought in the Sun acquisition is Free Software. Oracle execs apparently assumed that they could throw their weight around a bit and that the projects would fall in line. In the case of LibreOffice that was definitely not the case. All of a sudden opinions like yours (and mine) are starting to look workable. Oracle could realistically lose control of several of their Free Software projects (including MySQL) if it is not careful.

    9. Re:What? by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

      At this point, they should consider LibreOffice to be upstream of OpenOffice, not the other way around!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  3. It would be... by M0j0_j0j0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    a dangerous move to merge back , Oracle cannot be trusted.

    1. Re:It would be... by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's kind of what I was thinking. The reason for moving away from Oracle was because it cannot be trusted. They asked for the name and did not get it so they moved on. Now Oracle says "we're sorry, here you can have the name!" Can Oracle be trusted not to pull some sort of stunt if it were accepted?

      To Oracle: You're a big heavy company. You throw your weight around a lot. We don't like it, we don't like you and you simply can't be trusted any more than Microsoft or those of your ilk.

  4. Re:It is not OpenOffice by MBGMorden · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So after all that work of building up a brand with the horribly awkward name "OpenOffice.org"

    There may have been some feet stomping and pleading, but to virtually every person I've ever spoken to it was just "OpenOffice".

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  5. better name by aahpandasrun · · Score: 2

    LibreOffice is a better name anyway. OpenOffice.org sounds kind of infomercial-ish, and very 90s.

    1. Re:better name by Bloodwine77 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am sorry, but LibreOffice is a horrible name. I thought it was only supposed to be a temporary name when they initially forked. It is not a very catchy name and it does not roll off the tongue very well. I agree that going back to OpenOffice.org might not be the best thing to do, but they really need a new name.

    2. Re:better name by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2

      OpenOffice sounds like OpenOrifice and should probably have the logo of two hands holding open a big O.

      Nonetheless, it's still a better name than LibreOffice.

    3. Re:better name by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I like LibreOffice better than OpenOffice, but you're right. It's still a bad name.

      Personally I think "Document Foundation" sounds impressive. They should go with that.

      "Document Foundation Suite" sounds pretty good.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    4. Re:better name by RogerWilco · · Score: 2

      Document Foundation does indeed sound a lot better.

      I personally like what Apple and MS did, they gave the applications separate names: Pages, Word, Excel, Numbers, Keynote, Powerpoint.

      Writer, Calc, Draw, Impress aren't too bad in that respect. Officially they could have a DF prefix, so it would be DF Writer, DF Calc, DF Draw, DF Impress, and the whole thing would be Document Foundation Office, or just OpenOffice, both sound better than LibreOffice (and I'm not a native English speaker).

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  6. It's just fine the way it is now! by chasm!killer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Been using Libre Office since the first release (sorta buggy, but from second on, it's much more solid than Open Office ever was). Without the drag from the corporate offices, releases seem Really Fast (compared to the Open Office process) and easier to install, probably because of the shorter lag between underlying package releases and Office releases. I think the smaller group seems to have it together, and I sorta like it being fully independent (like Linux is). So in conclusion, let's just keep it the way it is....

    --
    -- Ancient (IBM 1620 and Atari 400) Programmer
  7. Re:really? by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    They could call it ShitOffice for all I cared. It can save in docx format, not perfectly of course, but better than Office can save in Open Document format, and that means within the next month or two OpenOffice is coming off all our machines.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  8. What Oracle Could Do by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oracle has three things of value for the community:

    The Copyrights

    Oracle still owns the copyrights of OpenOffice. Everybody will be able to use, modify, and distribute OpenOffice under the rights granted in the license, which never terminates. That license is LGPL2 for versions before 3.0, and LGPL3 for 3.0 beta and later, and the PDL for documentation. However, if the copyrights were transferred to a non-profit foundation, that foundation would be able to re-license OpenOffice as licenses develop. Laws change over time, and licenses must change to meet them. It would also be possible for the non-profit to enforce the larger part of the copyright rights. Currently, individual contributors or the project as their representative can enforce the copyright rights and license terms only on post-Oracle modifications. It would also be able to protect OpenOffice against pernicious changes in the commercial copyright holder. Products and companies get sold and change management. Remember that SCO was a "friendly" Linux company called Caldera before they went on their legal rampage. 501(c)3's, however, can devise covenants that keep their copyrights public property forever, and are legally limited to disburse their holdings only to other 501(c)3's on dissolution.

    The Domain

    OpenOffice.org is well known, and most instances of the software on user systems still reference it. Transferring this to a non-profit would be helpful.

    Patents

    Oracle might hold patents that read on OpenOffice, or could be used to defend it against other companies that bring patent suits. We can use Oracle's patents that are embedded in OpenOffice under the terms of the LGPL2 and LGPL3. But it would be nice to have some help in defending the program.

    How Oracle Can Hurt

    Oracle can hurt by trying to muscle the non-profit into accepting some sort of control from Oracle, be it a board position or something else. We have ample evidence that the project, since 1999, did poorly in gaining developers under a corporation's control. And if anything, Oracle makes other companies less comfortable than Sun would have. It's time for the project to be independent. The project should reject any offers that come with a demand for continuing control.

    Thanks

    Bruce

  9. Re:No it's not by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are you aware that there are languages other than English?

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  10. Another Open Office based option. by Magee_MC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Around the time of the split, I decided to give IBM Lotus Symphony a try. It's based on Open Office and so far I'm really happy with it. No real interest in going back to Open Office, and no need to try LibreOffice at this point.

    1. Re:Another Open Office based option. by Oligonicella · · Score: 2

      Used to be my standard for years. Auto-cap worked perfectly, unlike OO. Multi-document? No problem. Fonts, pdf generation and a few other big problems if you want to publish, though. Had to switch to OO, which is an inferior product, but has options I need.

  11. Re:really? by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Funny choice, because frankly unless there only goal is to make it popular in France ShitOffice would probably be a better name than leber-office (which is how I've heard everyone pronounce it so far, followed by WTF or WTH? )

    Seriously is there like a bylaw or something that says every damned FOSS app has to have a shitty/stupid/smartass name? Would you drink Fungus coffee? How about a Goatse choc bar? Maybe wash your hair with moneyshot shampoo? No? Then WTF!

    Would have really been so God damned hard, would it have REALLY put you out, to simply name it something like Freedom Office? Or Sharing Office? Names matter folks and the pretentious bullshit names really don't help your cause. At least open office (which FYI NOBODY called it OO.o) gave it a nice friendly sounding name. its open, like open house. Simple, easy, smart.

    So PLEASE for the love of all that is good and decent pick another damned name, or just bundle the damned thing with the Gimp and label under "shit nobody uses cause it just sounds nasty". I'd love to see FOSS guys name a soft drink, they'd probably be trying to sell ballsack cola or some shit, where the initials came out to something smug. Give me a break.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. Re:really? by Pieroxy · · Score: 2

    Have you ever wondered if that name sounded that bad in other languages? You know, the stuff 90% of earth talks with...

  14. Re:really? by Cinder6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why does the name have to reflect the fact that it's free? Those types of names always sound pretentious, and "Freedom Office" is much worse than LibreOffice ever could be (which is impressive). I shouldn't have to feel like a hippy just because of my choice of office suite. (Then again, maybe some people want that.)

    --
    If you can't convince them, convict them.
  15. Re:really? by smelch · · Score: 2

    Thats a dumb argument, usually names are translated. I bet they don't call it "Microsoft Office" in Germany. Also the development team is English speaking for the most part. The name isn't even that bad, whats worse are Android and Ubuntu versions, and even somewhat Apple's cat themed versions. Snow Leopard > Leopard > Panther? What criteria did they use to reach that conclusion? Which one looked most likely to taste the best? LibreOffice is fine actually. It makes a hell of a lot more sense than Intrepid Ibex or Froyo. Granted those are version names, but still. LibreOffice is not at all the worst offender in FOSS naming.

    --
    If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
  16. Re:No it's not by silanea · · Score: 2
    A quick search shows that some variation of "libre" is used and understood in the following languages:
    • French: libre
    • Italian: libera/-o
    • Spanish: libre
    • Portuguese: livre

    How do you define "Third World" exactly?

    --
    Rudolf Hess edited Mein Kampf. He was the very first grammar nazi.
  17. Re:really? by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

    Then why not sharing office? "Its Sharing office, share with your friends share with your neighbors, its okay by us!" Or Giving Office?" We give our Office software to you, please Give it to your friends and family. It always feels good to give!"

    Hell pick Anything short, catchy, easy for all to pronounce and understand, and memorable. It seems like FOSS goes out of their way to be real smug douchebags when it comes to names, and frankly its uncalled for number one, and doesn't help sell your product number two. You DO want to have people use this, yes? you DO want it to be popular so that open formats can replace .doc yes?

    So help your damned cause by stop being smug assholes! Names matter, which is why you are not drinking fartbreath cola and having a flaming gasbag burrito for lunch. or how about just "Free Office Suite"? Hell anything would be better than leber office. They should have to show that name to 100 random individuals in a dozen countries and see how many both pronounce it correctly AND knows WTF it means. If you don't score AT LEAST 70% then the name sucks and needs to go. Is it really so much to ask that the common man understand what your product is?

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  18. Re:Who cares? by sorak · · Score: 2, Funny

    Both suck. Do not want.

    Thank you for taking the time to inform us of your indifference. Would you care to make a list of other subjects you are not interested in? Maybe provide an XML feed, so I can have it as a widget on my phone?

    Let me make a few suggestions to get the ball rolling:

    The fall of the roman empire was gay!
    Aroma therapy sucks balls.
    I don't give a fuck about Alexander Hamilton.

    On second thought, I think I'll make my own feed.