Slashdot Mirror


An RC Car That Runs On Soda Can Rings

polyp2000 writes with an Engadget excerpt to inspire instant toy envy: "A pair of Spanish engineers have recently unveiled the dAlH2Orean (see what they did there?), a R/C car that runs on aluminum. Dropping a few soda can tabs into a tank of sodium hydroxide produces enough hydrogen to power the little speedster for 40 minutes — at almost 20mph."

25 of 135 comments (clear)

  1. Interesting... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just on an intuitive level, I'm a touch surprised that they managed to get that much running time out of the system.

    On consideration, of course, the energy required to coax aluminum out of whatever compound it has formed this time and into a bulk metallic state is pretty heroic. That does suggest that(while the aluminum oxide layer passivates it nicely under normal circumstances) bulk aluminum has some serious potential energy.

    1. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here is a page on the projects website, which provides at least some explanation of how it works. Depending on how recently you took chemistry, you can get at least some of the general picture of it all. I have to imagine that they are hiding at least some side effect, like potential cost in extracting the Aluminium from aluminium hydroxide. I don't really know any of the specifics to say though.

      http://www.dalh2orean.com/dAlH2Orean/Blog/Entradas/2011/4/15_Press_Conference.html

    2. Re:Interesting... by joocemann · · Score: 5, Interesting

      producing aluminum from boxite is extremely energy intensive. requires loads of electricity.

      we recycle aluminum not because it is of scarcity, but rather because the energy invested to produce it from boxite is 'saved'.

    3. Re:Interesting... by compro01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Extracting aluminum from aluminum hydroxide is the standard method (the Bayer process) for refining aluminum from bauxite.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    4. Re:Interesting... by geckipede · · Score: 2

      Aluminium as fuel has been proposed quite often for some truly insane concepts. One of my favourites was as an extremely dense energy source for long range supercavitating torpedoes - the idea was to use a quasiturbine engine that would ignite a seawater/aluminium foil mixture by compression of the combustion chamber. Essentially a hybrid of diesel engine and rocket, burning metal at white heat.

      There was also a rather wonderful spaceplane design, proposed back in the 30s I think, that would have used aluminium wings for takeoff, then once going fast enough, grind up the wings into powder and feed them into the engine as a secondary fuel source.

    5. Re:Interesting... by mrmeval · · Score: 3, Informative

      The space shuttle used aluminum fuel.
      http://www.nasa.gov/returntoflight/system/system_SRB.html

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    6. Re:Interesting... by EasyTarget · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Err.. that will be the Bayer process followed by the Hall–Héroult process.

      Hall–Héroult process is the one where a vast amount of electrical energy is used to extract the Metallic Aluminium from the Alumina that is the end product of the Bayer process.. Typically plants doing this have their own power station (often Hydroelectric.. but Nuclear is used too) due to the energy required.

      Not really very green huh.. it just displaces where the energy is input by several chemical steps.. The energy poured into making aluminium, is basically being extracted later on.

      Essentially the Aluminium is being used like a battery.. not a fuel.

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
  2. Real power by MrQuacker · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The real power comes from aluminum batteries though.

    FTA: There may be another way to transport electricity, using the Aluminum battery as a medium. Each kilogram of Aluminum produced represents about 14 KWh of electricity, used to produce the ingots. This means that if we ship 20,000 Tons of Aluminum to Europe, we would be transporting the equivalent of 20,000,000 * 14 KWh of electricity. This is 280 GWh of electricity, enough to power 500,000 households in Europe for a year. The question, of course, is how can we free this electricity from the Aluminum transported. Here comes the Aluminum battery. Using Aluminum electrodes in a simple electrochemical cell, filled with seawater or Sodium Hydroxide solution and using a Nickel-Manganese counter electrode, the Aluminum will be oxidized to Aluminum Hydroxide and give off 3 electrons per Al atom used up in the reaction. A large part of the electricity stored in the above 20,000 tons of Aluminum can in this way be released, generating about 280 GWh of electricity and about 60,000 tons of Al(OH)3 sludge. This sludge could be recycled back to Iceland to generate again 20,000 tons of Aluminum to start the process of electricity generation anew. http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=717

  3. Headline: Bad Student Work Gets Tons of Publicity by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This happens much, much too often on Slashdot.

    Aluminum takes a terrible lot of energy to refine from ore. The one good thing about that is that it's really easily recycled, so those aluminum cans sometimes get to be part of something again. But when you dissolve it in draino, and then, inevitably, dispose of the result in your landfill or sewer, you lose all of that energy and make some nasty pollution. What you get back in energy isn't a tiny fraction of what went in.

    But they got a patent. Because the patent office doesn't care if your work is good, only that it's original. So, a lot of ignorant people will be impressed by their "innovation".

    This would have been cool for a high-school science-fair project. Much too much bad science runs here.

  4. Lye by Fnord666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For those who don't recognize it, sodium hydroxide is more commonly known as lye. Not sure I would want to be in an accident in a full size vehicle powered by lye.

    --
    'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  5. Re:Headline: Bad Student Work Gets Tons of Publici by BitterOak · · Score: 2

    This happens much, much too often on Slashdot.

    Aluminum takes a terrible lot of energy to refine from ore. The one good thing about that is that it's really easily recycled, so those aluminum cans sometimes get to be part of something again. But when you dissolve it in draino, and then, inevitably, dispose of the result in your landfill or sewer, you lose all of that energy and make some nasty pollution. What you get back in energy isn't a tiny fraction of what went in.

    But they got a patent. Because the patent office doesn't care if your work is good, only that it's original. So, a lot of ignorant people will be impressed by their "innovation".

    This would have been cool for a high-school science-fair project. Much too much bad science runs here.

    But given the fact that most people don't get paid for dumping their aluminum in the recycle bin, this could be a good invention. You get to extract energy from the aluminum in your cans and use it yourself, rather than give it away to someone else for free.

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  6. Re:Only aluminum? by northernfrights · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure it mostly consumes the sodium hydroxide. At any rate, the aluminum is not the 'fuel source' so the way it's written is definitely wrong. As one of the posters down below said, this is as accurate as saying that my car runs on oxygen.

  7. Re:Headline: Bad Student Work Gets Tons of Publici by Anti_Climax · · Score: 2

    Because the patent office doesn't care if your work is good, only that it's original

    They do?
    ;)

    --
    Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
  8. Re:Only aluminum? by demonlapin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hehe, this gives me the opportunity to pass along an old favorite to a much younger generation. We were doing this around the time that today's college students were being born. The best part is that you can still get all the pieces for this (unlike many stories 20 years before my youth, which centered around things like large gunpowder fireworks and F-size model rocket engines).

    If you were to take a square of aluminum foil, fold it diagonally in half to create a crease, fill the crease with lye (available as Red Devil drain cleaner, among others), and the roll the whole thing up like a... uh... hand-rolled cigarette, and then to fill a (preferably small, 500 mL or less) bottle with a fair amount of water, into which you then place the Drano Reefer before quickly (but firmly) closing the cap and throwing it far, far away, you'd get the Drano Reefer bomb.

    The hydrogen comes from the water; the NaOH is merely a catalyst preventing the 2Al + 6H2O -> 2Al(OH)3 + 3H2 reaction from getting stopped by aluminum oxide films, etc. Done right, the gas pressure will rupture the bottle, while the hydrogen produced will add to any flame. For obvious reasons, not recommended for glass bottles.

    For an encore, take a metal can (soup, tomato, soda, whatever) and add roughly 1:1 ratio by volume of brake fluid and pool chlorinator (the "shock treatment" is preferred for its high free chlorine content). Adding fluid to chlorinator produces a delayed reaction; adding chlorinator to fluid produces a much faster reaction. Work with the proportions to produce the desired effect - if done properly, you can reliably produce any effect from smoke-only to rapid bonfire. Once you're comfortable with that, you can start working with paper or styrofoam cups to produce a self-immolating container.

  9. Why slashdot, why? by northernfrights · · Score: 2

    Since when is this a place to so drastically misrepresent something that the readers only think it's cool because they don't understand it? This happens all the time now. Sensationalism is growing threat to society's collective scientific comprehension.

  10. Kurt Vonnegut dream came true? by 4wdloop · · Score: 2

    Self-powered, self-recycling cars made of.... aluminum?

    --
    4wdloop
  11. Re:Headline: Bad Student Work Gets Tons of Publici by Kazymyr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sure. Let's all do this. Let's power up our cars by improvised H2 generators using discarded aluminum cans. Ignore practical considerations such as: does the average household generate enough alumionum waste to cover its energy requirements, prioce and safe handling of sodium hydroxide, disposal of aluminum sodium oxide etc.

    Fast forward 1 year. Most people who had started using the aluminum powered cars have abandoned the system.
    Why? Not enough waste aluminum generated by the household.
    Why? The price of canned soda has skyrocketed.
    Why? The deposit on cans has suddenly gone up from 5-10cents per can to %1.50 per can
    Why? Canners can't get cheap aluminum anymore
    Why? Aluminum doesn't get recycled anymore because it gets burned instead. So canners need to buy "new" aluminum, which costs a lot more. Why? It takes a lot of electricity to refine from ore.

    --
    I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
  12. Re:Headline: Bad Student Work Gets Tons of Publici by compro01 · · Score: 2

    disposal of the waste (tetrahydroxoaluminate) would be "sell it to the smelters". This is the first step of the Bayer process for refining aluminum from bauxite.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  13. Re:Headline: Bad Student Work Gets Tons of Publici by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    You're too quick to dismiss this. As a chemist I'm able to appreciate the simplicity and energy density of aluminum metal. The problem with this and other powerful reducing agents (fuels) is that they are dangerously flammable under the wrong conditions. Nevermind the energy demands associated with producing it - the key is really to heat the aluminium oxide/fluoride ore bauxite up and get it good and melting in a big iron container which serves as the cathode for the electrochemical cell. The anode of choice, at least my best guess is good old carbon or graphite. Yes, it takes a lot of current to reduce the aluminum, but that's the freaking point. It's an energy storage medium. But anyhow, if you have a ready source of thermal energy and/or electricity, like say a nuclear reactor, this is moot. Aluminum is hella lot better to cart around than hydrogen gas ( very poor energy density ).

    The idea of reducing/oxidizing a metal for energy is the principle for many existing battery designs, so the idea isn't new. Many of the problems are already apparent in other implementations, like the infamous "exploding" (I doubt they exploded, but they surely burnt hot and bright) lithium batteries.

    Indeed, lithium (metal) and aluminum are powerful, energy-dense fuels. Lithium is so reactive (and yet the least among group I metals) that it reacts spontaneously with oxygen in the air while its oxide dissolves in whatever atmospheric moisture it can suck up. Aluminum is probably nearly as electro-positive (I'm not checking a periodic table) and sports three electrons' worth of reducing power relative to lithium's one donor electron. Its self-passivization just might make it the right tool for a bunch of cool applications where lithium and other alkalis are too reactive, too. Unfortunately its a solid and not readily mechanically metered like gasoline so it may be some time before we find it as a direct source of mechanical power in our automobiles, but you never know.

  14. Re:Headline: Bad Student Work Gets Tons of Publici by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I suppose I should have put the period after "the patent office doesn't care."

  15. Seriously? by Arancaytar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Aluminium takes about 15kWh per kilogram to produce. Even if a larger car consumes only half as much mass relative to its own mass, a 1kg RC car using 10g of aluminium would scale up to a 1 ton car using 5kg, or 75kWh, for 20*2/3 miles, or approximately 20 kilomaters traveled, or 325kWh/100km.
    For comparison. a Tesla Roadster uses 17kWh per 100km.

    1. Re:Seriously? by rgviza · · Score: 2

      That works out to around 1kg Al per 5km.

      Aluminum is around $2.65 USD per kg, wholesale, on the metal exchanges.(http://www.metalprices.com/pubcharts/Public/Aluminum_Price_Charts.asp?WeightSelect=KG&SizeSelect=M&ccs=1011&cid=0)

      Gasoline is $3.75 per gallon USD.

      My car gets ~61km per gallon on a flat open highway cruising at 55mph with properly inflated tires.
      Operating costs:
      Gasoline: $.06/km
      Aluminum: $.53/km (just for the aluminum, assuming my car is one ton, which it's not, it's heavier)

      Given the fact that half the street urchins in the world are scavenging aluminum cans, often nearly immediately after someone tosses a can, and that there are metal recycling guys running around with trucks picking up every piece of scrap metal that isn't bolted to the ground (often they unbolt and steal stuff that is), the likelihood of running your car on free aluminum is nearly nil.

      You might get Al at wholesale prices if you buy a ton at a time. I'm not sure how that industry works. Sit a ton of aluminum in your back yard and see how long it takes to get stolen. Well maybe in a lot of places it wouldn't be, but in my neighborhood, it'd be gone in a day.

      You are right, it's not a great way to run a car.

      Nothing to see here, move along....

      --
      Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
  16. Re:Only aluminum? by elfprince13 · · Score: 2

    It must suck to live in suburbia. I could probably set off a few sticks of dynamite and no one would be the wiser. If anyone actually heard they would assume they noise came from one of the handful of gravel quarries within jogging distance of my house.

  17. Re:Headline: Bad Student Work Gets Tons of Publici by adolf · · Score: 2

    Oh sure, "sell it to the smelters", thanks for offering a non solution, you might want to try it before suggesting it.

    Here's an easy test with a readily available toxic product, take an old 12 volt lead/acid car battery to a Lead Smelter and see how long they Laugh at you before they turn you away

    One word: Scale.

    Take a small amount of n to an n smelter, and they'll laugh at you -- it's not worth their time to deal with such quantities.

    Offer to sell a few railcars full of n to them, and you'll have their interest immediately.

    (Where n is this funky spent aluminum, or lead-acid batteries, or steel, or iron, or copper, or...)

    This is where recycling centers and scrap yards come into play. They consolidate the goods into sufficient quantities that they are worth transporting and bargaining for. There's a place not far from here that pays $8 for old car batteries, and they're happy to buy them one at a time, but they're not a smelter.

    To use a computer analogy: Try to buy a single CPU from Intel and see how long they Laugh at you before they turn you away.

  18. Re:Only aluminum? by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 2

    2 Al + 2 NaOH + 2 H2O 2 NaAlO2 + 3 H2

    Aluminium uses massive amounts of electricity to produce, Sodium Hydroxide production uses massive amounts of energy .... and this process is quite inefficient ...

    New fuel, no ....

    --
    Puteulanus fenestra mortis