Slashdot Mirror


Doctor Who's Elisabeth Sladen (Sarah Jane) Dies at 63

Doofus writes "NPR reports that Elisabeth Sladen, who played the Doctor's assistant Sarah Jane, has died at 63. Sladen played opposite Jon Pertwee and then Tom Baker, and eventually earned her own show. BBC stories here, including a picture with K9, and here."

96 of 132 comments (clear)

  1. Good Bye Sarah Jane by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Way before her time. She will be missed!

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    1. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      She will be missed indeed. I was very suprised at how much this saddened me. She was but one actor in such a long running show, and yet it is amazing how her character's impact is still felt today (at least for me). I think it was because she was on for so long, and because she had such a warm connection with the Doctor. You could tell they cared for each other, more than with other companions (and without all the stupid sexual angst that the modern series displays).

      When she reprised her role in the modern series, it was such a delight to see her again; it was like seeing an old friend. It was nice that this feeling was also displayed by the Doctor, who referred to her fondly as "my Sarah Jane".

      I have been watching The Sarah Jane Adventures recently. A lot of the stories are understandably juvenile, but there have been some in the later seasons that really quite good. I still haven't finished watching the show, but it is going to be very sad to do so knowing that Elisabeth Sladen has passed away. I hope that this last season has a fitting finale with which to bid her goodbye.

    2. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by Ciggy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Perhaps like me she would have been one of the first (most likely the first) assistants you remembered as I started watching Dr Who in the early '70s.

      Even after watching later, and pre (on video), incarnations of Dr Who, Jon Pertwee + Elizabeth Sladen will always be the doctor and his assistant to me.

      --

      A rose by any other name would smell as sweet;
      A chrysanthemum by any other name would be easier to spell
    3. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I finished watching The Sarah Jane Adventures last week. The last episode is a fitting end to the fourth season, and now the series.

      The episodes were a lot less juvenile that I thought they would be. Season 3 Episode 7 is the scariest new Doctor Who / spin-off episode since "Blink".

      Farewell Sarah Jane. You are now embarking on the endless journey through time and space.

    4. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My first would have been Liz Shaw, although she never had much impact for me. Jo Grant was a bigger hit with me as a kid because she was more familiar to me since she acted like a big kid. Plus I thought she was the hottest woman on TV at the time.

      But Sarah Jane was such a strong character, more forthright and proactive than the other two companions I had seen. She also was the first one (for me) to cross the border of regeneration. I think that the warmth of Tom Baker's Doctor may have coloured how I saw Sarah Jane. Perhaps they really weren't as close as I imagined; it is just that their relationship post-regeneration seemed friendlier.

    5. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by Psychotria · · Score: 2

      I'm a bit shocked that she died so young (63!!), but comments like yours indicate that she will live for a long time yet in the hearts of her fans (yeah, I know that sounds corny and is probably a bit of a cliché, but it's true). We will all die. The legacy we leave is worth a lot; in some instances it leads to immortality.

    6. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by Swampash · · Score: 1

      Yep. I remember Jo but Sarah Jane will always be THE Companion in my mind. RIP.

    7. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by osu-neko · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm a bit shocked that she died so young (63!!)...

      Cancer sucks...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    8. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 1

      good fucking riddance to yet more british scum.

      When I waved good bye to the Mayflower on that uneventful day in 1620, I just wished them luck and quietly lamented their loss of reason to absurd religious pecadillo.

      But I guess there's some value in being blunt.

    9. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by digitig · · Score: 1

      The first companion I remember was Susan Foreman. Now, get off my lawn!

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    10. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by Spacelem · · Score: 2

      Cancer sucks...

      I know. My dad died of cancer this time last year aged 58, so I'm feeling rather upset about her death.

      Sarah Jane Smith was one of my favourite assistants, from my favourite era of Doctor Who. I'll miss her :(

    11. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by murdocj · · Score: 1

      It's funny how the first Doctor that you see is "The Doctor". For me it's Tom Baker... I must have started watching in the late 70's or early 80s and to me Tom will always be "The Doctor". I did love Sarah Jane Smith, she really had far more "character" than a lot of the other companions.

    12. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But I guess there's some value in being blunt.

      Very true - it speaks volumes about the ignorant cunt who employs it.

    13. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by markhb · · Score: 1

      For those of us in the US who watched the show in college, we saw a lot of her. Apparently Lionheart, the BBC marketing arm at the time, had a policy that for every run of a Doctor Who series a PBS station bought -- Pertwee, Davison, Hartnell and Troughton once they started syndicating those, etc. -- they also had to buy a full run of Tom Baker. So we saw lots of Sarah Jane (not to mention every third week was a rerun of Robot).

      As the GP said, Elisabeth has left us far too soon. Thank heavens they filmed School Reunion; nuWho would have been far poorer without it.

      --
      Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
    14. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      I can see how you would be saddened I am as well. I mean it's Sarah Smith who I will miss. I am sorry for the family's loss, she has alot of fans that will miss her as well.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    15. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by asdf7890 · · Score: 2

      She didn't show the 63 years either. OK so she was obviously no spring chicken, but she was in very good mental and physical condition compared to many 63 year olds.

    16. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      (other than the cancer, of course)

    17. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by Spacelem · · Score: 1

      Well, I suppose I do hold a certain nostalgia for Sylvester McCoy, as he was the first Doctor I remember seeing, however having gone through and watched almost all the classic series, it's now Tom Baker, and with Tom Baker it's a tough call between Sarah Jane Smith and Leela. Bonnie Langford on the other hand...

      Not that I'd want to try to rank the actors, as they all do great things and add something unique to the role, and I'm happy to watch any of the Doctors (although sometimes the scripts and directing have had their low points).

    18. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      She's a fox. I bet she was a good fuck, even in her ripe old age. Do you think that she ever fooled around with that canine?

      63 is hardly a ripe old age, you silver tongued charmer.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    19. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      Well, I suppose I do hold a certain nostalgia for Sylvester McCoy

      Mrs McCoy will be glad to hear that the number of her husband's fans has just doubled.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    20. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by Chardansearavitriol · · Score: 1

      I wonder, do you think she'll be given the honor of having her ashes put into space, like many others have? I dont know how much fictional characters actors do this sorta thing, but considering the legacy of Doctor Who and its supreme importance to modern culture, it seems a fitting departure.

    21. Re:Good Bye Sarah Jane by camperdave · · Score: 1

      It's funny how the first Doctor that you see is "The Doctor".

      Well... I guess I'm the exception to that premise. The first Doctor I saw (maybe an episode or two) was Jon Pertwee, but that was quickly followed by Tom Baker. None of the others since quite cut it for me until David Tenant took over the TARDIS. He is now the first person I think of when I hear of "The Doctor"

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  2. So long Sarah Jane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    If only she could regenerate like the Doctor :( She will be missed by millions of fans.

  3. What? by Laebshade · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who?

    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's Doctor Who, to you, sir.

    2. Re:What? by bluemonq · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's The Doctor to you.

    3. Re:What? by anotheryak · · Score: 1

      That's really unfair to assume that the poster must be American, since Tom Baker and Elisabeth Sladen were the team that introduced Doctor Who to the USA, and are still the most beloved here by most viewers.

      I'm not a huge Tom Baker fan (Peter Davision was my favorite, because he had better stories), but Elisabeth Sladen was my favorite companion. I recall at 13 having tears in my eyes when she left the Tardis.

      To me, Elisabeth Sladen will always be Sara-Jane Smith.

      I could go on a rant here about the English always complaining how awful all Americans are, and then talk about one of my grandfathers getting half his head blown off saving your nation (and a great uncle got gassed saving it 30 years earlier when y'all started the previous war you then wanted us to bail you out of), but this is not the place for it.

      And, you *DO* sound "like a hater".

  4. Bad things Happen in 3's by supertrinko · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Brigadier, died in February. The Celestial Toymaker, died in March. Sarah Jane Smith, died in April. I hope it ends here.

    --
    If it rhymes it must be true.
    1. Re:Bad things Happen in 3's by iced_773 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tom Baker's getting up there in years...God I hope it doesn't happen

    2. Re:Bad things Happen in 3's by syousef · · Score: 1

      The Brigadier, died in February.
      The Celestial Toymaker, died in March.
      Sarah Jane Smith, died in April.
      I hope it ends here.

      Sadly I think not even if this cluster ends. Most of the actors were between 20 and 40 at the time of the original Dr Who's (and some where older) between 1960 and the mid 1980s. They aren't going to live forever. Men and women in their 80s and 90s will die. The actors of the original Dr Who series are aging and dying. That's just the way life works. It's even less nice when a lady in her 60s dies, but that too happens. Life expectency in the UK is just short of 80.

      http://www.google.com/publicdata?ds=wb-wdi&met=sp_dyn_le00_in&idim=country:GBR&dl=en&hl=en&q=life+expectancy+united+kingdom

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    3. Re:Bad things Happen in 3's by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know you've been following a show for a long time when you start to tune in for the obituaries

      :_(

      Goodbye Sara Jane.

    4. Re:Bad things Happen in 3's by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      If it does, he'll be replaced by Peter Davison.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    5. Re:Bad things Happen in 3's by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 2

      Life expectency in the UK is just short of 80.

      And, if you ignore deaths of infants and young children, has not increased by much since WW1. We somewhat overestimate the efficacy of modern healthcare at prolonging adult life (though it can do great things for improving quality of life) - the best policies involve mostly simple rules about good nutrition, sanitation and observation.

      Yet we are crap at implementing programmes for detecting cancer early. It is only partly a tech problem - the main stumbling block is the requirement for a socialised solution: free and frequent testing. The UK is in the process of privatising its health service, and is pretty much a lost cause if the current coalition government does not collapse.

    6. Re:Bad things Happen in 3's by ciderbrew · · Score: 2

      :)

      When he turns into Sylvester McCoy I'll leave the room.

    7. Re:Bad things Happen in 3's by memojuez · · Score: 1

      He'll have to go through Collin Baker first.

      --
      Signature applied for, Patent Pending
    8. Re:Bad things Happen in 3's by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

      You're right, I'd have left the room already.

    9. Re:Bad things Happen in 3's by Grygus · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but saying that life expectancy hasn't advanced much if you ignore all the people who didn't die young doesn't really seem to be much of a statement at all.

    10. Re:Bad things Happen in 3's by Butterspoon · · Score: 1

      I know it's fun to claim that the National Health Service is being privatised - but that doesn't make it true and it's not.

      There is currently a strong focus in cancer care in the UK on early detection, which saves lives as well as money, though in some cases aggressive screening programmes have been found to do neither.

      --
      pi = 2*|arg(God)|
    11. Re:Bad things Happen in 3's by crakbone · · Score: 1

      There is a difference in the average adult life span and average child life span. Average life span of a human that makes it to adult has not changed much at all. But the average life span of a child making it to adult has quite a bit. That can skew how you look at numbers quite a bit if you look at average life span of humans in general. Take for example the average adult life expectancy in 1900 was 47.2 while in 1996 it was around 76. This did not mean at about 50 years most of your adults were kicking the bucket, but that most children died within in the first ten years of life. A lot of adults in 1900's still made it to 76 years old.

    12. Re:Bad things Happen in 3's by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but saying that life expectancy hasn't advanced much if you ignore all the people who didn't die young doesn't really seem to be much of a statement at all.

      It's a very strong statement, if one is considering how much longer an adult might continue to live. To put it bluntly, reductions in infant mortality don't help *me* live any longer, since I'm not an infant.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    13. Re:Bad things Happen in 3's by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 2

      I know it's fun to claim that the National Health Service is being privatised - but that doesn't make it true and it's not.

      Perhaps when you were studying the government's plans you skipped over the privatisation of management (including resource allocation) and use of private healthcare providers. Worse, perhaps you're so young that you forget what it was like before the proto-marketplace of "trusts".

      The NHS is a (1) national (2) health (3) service. Trusts eroded (1) but the GP consortia plan destroys the notion entirely. (3) does not apply if the government merely allocates funds but does not actually provide a service. As for (2), good health is primarily about good nutrition, good sanitation and good observation. They are social goals - the first two countering the "squalor" of Beveridge's five giants, the last countering "ignorance" - not goals for individuals.

      There is currently a strong focus in cancer care in the UK on early detection, which saves lives as well as money

      There is currently a strong focus on early detection for specific cancers for specific risk groups.

      though in some cases aggressive screening programmes have been found to do neither

      You're probably thinking of a problem like this one which manifests itself particularly in the fashionable alarm-inducing cancers. Unfortunately, certain groups are misinterpreting (and I use that word inappropriately generously) the problem as being one of too much screening, rather than an understanding that sometimes the best approach is watch and wait rather than immediately aggressively treat. IOW, the aggression is in the response to screening.

      Aside from breast, do you have any other "aggressive screening programmes" you have on your mind to criticise?

    14. Re:Bad things Happen in 3's by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      Some kind of Dalek conspiracy?

    15. Re:Bad things Happen in 3's by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      The Brigadier, died in February.
      The Celestial Toymaker, died in March.
      Sarah Jane Smith, died in April.
      I hope it ends here.

      Yeah, you hear that, television actors? We don't want you to die any more! Be immortal, starting now!

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    16. Re:Bad things Happen in 3's by Grygus · · Score: 1

      Obviously, but the fact that you are alive and not a dead infant is still relevant. Modern medical science does in fact increase your chances of survival to age 80 from the time you are born; the fact that we've made no appreciable progress on immortality since World War I is hardly worth mentioning.

    17. Re:Bad things Happen in 3's by Chardansearavitriol · · Score: 1

      I really dont like the "average lifespan" measurements. They're nonsense! Most sudden deaths happen in infants, infalting the number massively. Moreso if you count miscarraiges. Really, if you make it past those first few hell years, you will probably have quite some time left, barring extreme violence, major disease or overwhelming senescence.

    18. Re:Bad things Happen in 3's by syousef · · Score: 1

      I really dont like the "average lifespan" measurements. They're nonsense! Most sudden deaths happen in infants, infalting the number massively. Moreso if you count miscarraiges. Really, if you make it past those first few hell years, you will probably have quite some time left, barring extreme violence, major disease or overwhelming senescence.

      All of that is reflected. Your life expectancy as calculated in life tables actually increases if you make it through childhood. Where you live has a lot more to do with life expectancy though. In some places it's still not 50 years of age.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    19. Re:Bad things Happen in 3's by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I know it's fun to claim that the National Health Service is being privatised - but that doesn't make it true and it's not.

      What would you call it then? Let me guess: "empowering stakeholders" or "liberalising finance structures" or "removing anti-competitive practices" or "enabling choice"?

      If the coalition cuts 200,000+ jobs in the NHS how exact;y will this not affect free patient care? You can't make that many fucking efficiency savings. But just as long as you don't call it privatisation, that's all right.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  5. Even in the new series... by ndogg · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even in the new series, she was awesome. She'll be sorely missed.

    Neil Gaiman tweeted about this video, and it seems apropos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1QgCx1CIaQ&feature=youtu.be

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    1. Re:Even in the new series... by Isaac-1 · · Score: 1

      This is sad news, I was just watching her Sarah Jane Adventures skit for Comic Relief last year on youtube a couple of hours ago.

    2. Re:Even in the new series... by RDW · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Tom Baker on the news:

      http://www.tom-baker.co.uk/pages/content/index.asp?PageID=159

      'Sarah Jane dead? No, impossible! Impossible. Only last week I agreed to do six new audio adventures with her for Big Finish Productions...She can't be dead. But she is: she died yesterday morning. Cancer. I had no idea she was ill; she was so private, never wanted any fuss, and now, gone. A terrible blow to her friends and a shattering blow for all those fans of the programme whose lives were touched every Saturday evening by her lovely heroic character, Sarah-Jane Smith.'

    3. Re:Even in the new series... by Psmylie · · Score: 1

      Agreed... she had class both in and out of the role she played on the show. She will be sorely missed.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

  6. K9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    John Kovalich summed it up nicely: http://www.dorktower.com/images/comics/DorkTower942.gif

    1. Re:K9 by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 3, Informative

      Parent link really is worth the trouble to follow.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:K9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    3. Re:K9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      +1 Beautiful?

    4. Re:K9 by Trapezium+Artist · · Score: 1
      Oh, good grief: I managed to hold it together until I saw that. I know it's utterly daft, but I'm on the verge of tears now ... :-(

      You will be greatly missed, Elisabeth.

    5. Re:K9 by fremsley471 · · Score: 1

      Beautiful indeed, elicited a tear from this middle-aged man.

    6. Re:K9 by rkhalloran · · Score: 1

      You and a few thousand other Whovians, friend, myself included.....

    7. Re:K9 by dufachi · · Score: 1

      Same here and I am still struggling not to burst into tears and have my family wondering wtf I am bawling about. :/

      --
      -Kinsey
    8. Re:K9 by anotheryak · · Score: 1

      Same here. I lost it after I saw that cartoon.

    9. Re:K9 by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      John Kovalich summed it up nicely: http://www.dorktower.com/images/comics/DorkTower942.gif

      I know Sarah Jane got her own K-9 in that one TV special long ago ("K-9 and Co."? Can't be bothered to look it up...) and then got a new one from the Tenth Doctor, which made a small number of appearances... But still, isn't it a little strange to use K-9 as a memorial for her when K-9 didn't appear on Doctor Who until after Sarah Jane left?

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    10. Re:K9 by Xebikr · · Score: 1

      You would have to have watched "The Sarah Jane Adventures". K-9 was a main character.

    11. Re:K9 by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      You would have to have watched "The Sarah Jane Adventures". K-9 was a main character.

      Really? I've never watched it but I'd heard he barely appeared at all in it...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    12. Re:K9 by Xebikr · · Score: 1

      Well, perhaps 'main character' is overstating it. He was in 11 of the 47 episodes, and always called her "Mistress".

    13. Re:K9 by HaveNoMouth · · Score: 1
      Well there's a first. A robot dog just made me cry while reading Slashdot.

      *sniff*

  7. Spoiler Alert! by metalmaster · · Score: 2

    Dont read below this line if you do not wish for the story to be spoiled....

    ...everyone dies eventually

    In an somewhat related note, this is one of the issues I had with the most recent Dynasty Warriors game. The campaign mode followed each of the prominent officers and generals until their death; untimely or not. It really put a damper on things.

    p.s I wanted to put more space before the big spoiler alert, but slashdot's junk filter caught on

    1. Re:Spoiler Alert! by iced_773 · · Score: 1

      Easy now, I meant I hope it doesn't happen in May.

  8. SORELY missed by Unka+Willbur · · Score: 4, Informative

    Like so many folks, she was my first "Doctor Who Girl" and I've had a crush on her all these years. I got to interview her in the early 80s and a nicer, kinder and more friendly person I have never met. A great actress and good person. She's the first celebrity whose death I have wept for in I don't know how long. She will be sorely missed and always remembered.

    --
    "Remember when I said I would never lie? Well, that was the first time."
    1. Re:SORELY missed by JustOK · · Score: 1

      what season was she on?

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  9. Re:WTF is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How about you just go fuck yourself and die.

  10. This news struck a chord for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There is more to life than 80-hour weeks on a software project.

    Don't assume you'll have "all those years in retirement" to enjoy the World.

    Get out there and live before your bell rings.

    Give your wife a kiss now and tell her you love her.

    1. Re:This news struck a chord for me by Plammox · · Score: 2

      With the amount of people turned into minced meat on the road, these days, the amount of people receiving a verdict of terminal cancer, stress-induced heart disease, being here, right now is as good as it gets. Some people tend to ignore that. There is really no need to post as AC with a message like above, is there?

  11. Culture by k2r · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > Last time I check Slashdot wasn't some Hollywood gossip blog.

    1) What Hollywood? She wasn't American.
    2) Doctor Who is a cultural phenomenon most British and many internatonal readers of Slashdot grew up with. Hell, I was born in the year Elisabeth Sladen became the compagnon and though I'm not even British I know her.
    Slashdot is about culture and those things are part of geek culture.

  12. Goodby Liz! by NetMassimo · · Score: 2

    I'm generally a lurker here at Slashdot but Sarah Jane was my first companion so I find Elisabeth Sladen's death particularly sad, also coming not long after Nicholas Courtney's death. It's like the end of an era is coming. :-(((

    --
    Ciao :-) Massimo
  13. Way before her time? by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    Really? Can't tell with time travel, could be after her time.

    I will check that a little bit more sometime 2 weeks ago.

  14. Re:WTF is this? by BluBrick · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hollywood?
    HOLLYWOOD?

    Gimme your Geek Card...


    NOW mister!

    --
    Ahh - My eye!
    The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  15. Goodbye old friend by Nov8tr · · Score: 1

    Having watched Doctor Who since the seventies, she will be sorely missed. I have enjoyed so many hours watching her beside 2 doctors and then through her own series. Which she very much deserved and I very much enjoyed. So many of the people I have enjoyed in my life have gone away and now another one leaves me behind. Goodbye my friend.

    --
    I'm old, not dead. Well that's my 2 cents worth, your mileage may vary. I say what I think, not what you want to hear.
  16. au revoir by symes · · Score: 2

    Living round the corner from Sarah Jane's house it feels like we've lost a mildly eccentric neighbour - there's always a buzz when they film here, particularly so for the local children. I feel Elisabeth Sladen created an engaging character that went beyond the Dr Who franchise - that dotty sixty something year old women had a lot of fun and life in them, unusual for what is still a very male dominated genre.

  17. Farewell by Alan+R+Light · · Score: 1

    Just adding my farewell. Sarah Jane was always my favorite Dr Who companion.

  18. Mistress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    K9 shall go on in the void looking for his mistress

  19. Well done, Liz... by beaverdownunder · · Score: 1

    Great career, great achievements... great life. Well done.

  20. Way too early by itsanx · · Score: 1

    While not having two hearts like a time lord, she demonstrated that humans can indeed carry great depths of warmth and wisdom. RIP Elisabeth Sladen.

  21. Re:Who ? by ratbag · · Score: 2

    At the risk of feeding the troll: the people who are deeply saddened are "within the miniscule circle of people who watched Dr. Who". They are sharing their grief, in a natural, human way.

    Your mealy-mouthed quotes ("deeply saddened") are unnecessary - many people are genuinely saddened to see another part of their childhood gone. That more than anything is what gets me thinking.

    I am not as saddened by her passing as I was by the death of my father last year of cancer, aged 67, but the parallels are all too plain for me, and I suspect others who have posted here and in other forums.

    Feel free to go and puke, we'll carry on without you quite happily.

  22. Saddened by the news by realsilly · · Score: 1

    She was my First Doctor's (Tom Baker) assistant (Elisabeth Sladen). It was the way that her chemistry bounced off of Tom Baker and the great adventures they went on together that drew me into Dr. Who. I was hooked.

    In the last year or so, I've been re-introduced to Dr. Who and was delightfully surprised when she appeared on some more recent episodes with David Tennant (I think it was David).

    She was wonderful and fun and I hope her spirit lives on beyond her. Good bye Sarah Jane.

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
    1. Re:Saddened by the news by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      She appeared on the main show with David Tennant, while both David Tennant and Matt Smith appeared on her show.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
  23. RIP Sarah Jane by rkhalloran · · Score: 1

    Like many here, she was the first Companion I saw, with the Tom Baker episodes from the 70s. Unlike most of them before or since, she held her own with Baker (as I later saw she had with Pertwee). Of all the companions to bring back to the new series, she was the obvious choice, and my grandkids have enjoyed the spin-off Sarah Jane Adventures, which led to them now watching the Tom Baker episodes as well.

    She will be missed as much as she was loved by fans worldwide. Requesicat in pace, Elisabeth.

  24. Re:Who ? by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

    Well spoken, sir.

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
  25. Will be missed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Elisabeth Sladen's portrayal of an intelligent and competent woman had a direct positive influence on how I learned to look at women and view relationships. While the rest guys my age were ogling teh bewbs of Farah Fawcett, I along with the other young geeks had Sarah Jane Smith with brains (and yes good looks too).

    She will be missed

  26. Elizabeth Sladen by whitroth · · Score: 1

    Way too young. However, either the wikipedia article or all the news stories are wrong. If she was born in '46, she was 65.

                      mark

    1. Re:Elizabeth Sladen by Kirin+Fenrir · · Score: 2

      Way too young. However, either the wikipedia article or all the news stories are wrong. If she was born in '46, she was 65.

      mark

      They could both be right. She was friends with a time traveler, after all. :)

      --
      Caffeine is my anti-drug!

      Duranin - A NWN2 Roleplaying Persistent World
    2. Re:Elizabeth Sladen by Psmylie · · Score: 1

      The Fourth Doctor dropped her off in the wrong place AND two years late!

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

  27. Proof that bad things happen in threes by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 1

    Bad things really do happen in threes. I can prove it. Here's a list of 2011 famous deaths - pick any three.

  28. Died/Dead by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    Hamlet dies. Real people generally die just the once.

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  29. RIP by fangmcgee · · Score: 1

    Too soon. She will be missed.

  30. Freaky timing by Mad-Bassist · · Score: 1

    I just spent last weekend watching most of the fourth season of SJA, except for the last story: "Goodbye, Sarah Jane Smith," then I got the news yesterday. I'm sure no one knew that would be her final show. It's going to make it sad when I finally watch it.

    A few episodes back, there was "The Death of The Doctor" with Matt Smith. The real surprise was Katy Manning playing Jo Grant: the previous companion. It was neat seeing them interact, although the previous get-together between Sarah Jane and Rose Tyler can't be beat. I see Manning was born in 1949, so she's a bit younger. I also see she once posed nude with a Dalek back in '77. *scratches head* Okay, back to Ms. Sladen.

    I had no idea she was in her sixties--she looked great and had to be in shape. Cancer is a real bastard.

    I first saw her and The Doctor (Tom Baker) when I was twelve or so, thanks to PBS for bringing it to us in the states all these years. She will be missed.

    --
    "The only legitimate use of a computer is to play games." - Eugene Jarvis
  31. Cancer SUX by niftymitch · · Score: 1

    Cancer SUX.
    It just SUX....rocks.

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.