Slashdot Mirror
Ask Slashdot: Best Small-Footprint Modern Browser?
Annirak writes "I've recently started a paid internship at a company which is expanding faster than their IT department can supply new hardware. As a consequence, I've been issued a P4 2.4GHz with 512MB of RAM. Currently, I am using Firefox 4, but I find that it eats up far too much of my limited RAM. I'd rather not give up some of the more modern UI features that are offered by the current versions of Firefox and Chrome, but I need a smaller footprint. What other browsers are out there which could help me conserve resources?"
It's not expensive and if you get worth out of the investment it's a good thing all the way around.
Spoken like someone who hasn't looked at DDR1 RAM prices lately.
I use Opera 11 with Windows 2000 on my P3 with 256 MB of RAM and it works quite well.
Don't do this. As illogical as uppity Slashdot "power users" think it is, IT departments hate it when people upgrade their machines without consulting them. Full-time employees, they'd probably be willing to let it slide after a stern talk, but for interns? No guarantees.
As for keeping memory usage down, Opera 9 is a good bet (10 is a little heavier), but no matter what browser you use, you may have to change your browsing habits a little. Loads of tabs open is going to eat up memory no matter what browser you're on, and all of them have memory leaks to some extent (though none quite so bad as Firefox...), so you may want to set your browser to "reopen the tabs I had last" on startup, and just quit-restart every now and then.
Dislike the Electoral College? Lobby your state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
"...expanding faster than their IT department can supply new hardware" is corporate terms for "..because we are almost broke"
My recommendation, just stay away.
don't cut it off www.mgmbill.org
Run the browser on the Corei7 guy's computer, use his RAM, and see it on yours. ;-)
As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
I like my rouge server, but not as much as my teal one.
Sorry Frosty, but you just don't seem to get that the IT department NEEDS to know what is going on with the equipment, regardless of whether it is a brand new shiny system, or an ancient hunk of crap.
If the OP simply gets permission to add RAM, or is lucky enough to convince the IT department to buy and install it, then everyone wins. If he just buys it, and installs it, then everyone loses.
With permission, the OP gets what he needs to function (as long as it is actually necessary, and the function provided is more than to just be able to watch the latest youtube videos), and the IT department knows about the change, so that if something goes wrong with the PC, they can correct it more easily.
The additional benefit is that the IT department can track the expense of bringing the antiquated garbage to a usable condition, and can justify to the bean counters that they need to bring in more new PC's so that the workers (full time, part time, AND interns) can function properly.
If the OP just acquires an additional stick of RAM, then:
1. He's out the cash for the RAM.
2. If the OP doesn't get the exact correct stick of RAM, then odd issues may arise, generating unnecessary expensive trouble tickets. In addition, if the OP doesn't admit that he/she did this, then there are extra steps introduced because the system is no longer what it is documented as... (It just adds extra unnecessary confusion.)
3. The machine works better, but the cost is not accounted for, and it makes it more difficult to justify replacing it, as there is no cost that can be shown to accounting.
Frankly, it just screws up everything if it doesn't go through the IT department.
Once the precedent is set, then you have opened up a can of worms where every intern (and other person in the establishment) thinks it's okay to change out system parts to suit their fancy. Bob changes out his video card, Sue adds a blue-ray burner, and Elmo decides that he prefers to use Open Office and Firefox, because if they can change the hardware (and drivers), then why can't he change software?
You end up with a difficult to maintain mess, and the bean counters are wondering how come it is so expensive to run the computers...
(This doesn't even begin to touch on security issues)
Nail on the head.
To the OP: If the hardware is *legitimately* too old to support your business needs (not your "slashdot reading" needs), then you should build a case for an upgrade or replacement. To do that, figure out how much they're paying you, and how long you'll be paid for as an intern.
Then calculate how much time you're wasting due to a slow computer. And don't just pull numbers out of your ass. Actually time stuff like bootup/login, load times, etc., and ask a co-worker with a modern system if you can do the same with theirs as a baseline, so you can calculate what portion of that time is actually wasted time due to slow/old/bad hardware.
Then, you make you pitch like so: "I'm spending X minutes per day twiddling my thumbs waiting for something to finish running. You're paying me X dollars an hour. A RAM upgrade would cost X dollars, and reduce my wasted daily time by X%." If the cost of the upgrade is more than the amount of time they're paying you for that's legitimately wasted then no, a RAM upgrade doesn't make sense. If the cost of the upgrade is significantly cheaper than the value of the time they're paying you for that's legitimately wasted, then yes, a RAM upgrade makes a lot of sense.
If you can't get management support, then spending your own money and time is foolish, and is just as likely to be unappreciated & met with hostility as it is to be met with cheers of "Way to take the initiative, old chap!"