Slashdot Mirror


AF 447 Flight Recorder Found In the Atlantic

romiz writes "The memory of the flight recorder for the Air France 447 flight from Rio de Janeiro to Paris, crashed on June 1st 2009, has been found on the seabed of the Atlantic Ocean, and brought back to the surface in good shape. This is the data recorder, which saves the flight parameters. The search is still continuing in hope of finding the voice recorder containing the sounds recorded in the plane's cockpit."

24 of 218 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Needle in a Hay Stack by cdrudge · · Score: 5, Funny

    All the way.

  2. Amazing by HangingChad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The memory of the flight recorder for the Air France 447 flight from Rio de Janeiro to Paris, crashed on June 1st 2009, has been found on the seabed of the Atlantic Ocean...

    When you look at the twisted mass of wreckage the flight recorder came from, finding the data unit is a miracle. Thousands of feet underwater, working remotely in a pile of twisted metal and they find a little memory unit. I have trouble finding my car keys some days.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Amazing by SydShamino · · Score: 2

      1% interest rate on $24M would be enough to pay the annual salaries of chauffeurs 24/7 to sit in your driveway holding your keys, for life.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:Amazing by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is quite possibly one of the best examples of just how far underwater robotics have come. They literally found something that is harder to find then a needle in a haystack by several orders of magnitude.

    3. Re:Amazing by Aardpig · · Score: 4, Funny

      In fact, finding a needle in a haystack is trivial. Douse the whole stack in gas, torch it, and then run a strong electromagnet over the ash.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    4. Re:Amazing by kangsterizer · · Score: 2

      Of euros. I think it's worth mentioning that the French found it. Not that they've been fast tho , but credit where it's due ;-)

    5. Re:Amazing by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think it's worth mentioning that the French found it.

      With more than a little of help from the Americans at WHOI .

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    6. Re:Amazing by zippthorne · · Score: 2

      What is the gas for?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    7. Re:Amazing by daBass · · Score: 2

      When you look at the twisted mass of wreckage the flight recorder came from, finding the data unit is a miracle.

      I miracle would have been some deity appearing in the cockpit on that fateful night and telling the guys how to not get into this mess.

      Finding this flight recorder is simply a great achievement of science, technology and perseverance.

      I really wish people would stop calling great examples of human ingenuity with no evidence of divine intervention "miracles".

      "Miracle on the Hudson" my ass!

  3. DO NOT CLICK ON THIS LINK! by jimicus · · Score: 3, Informative

    Do not click on above link, it's a shock video.

    No mod points or I'd mod it down.

  4. gps? on the ocean floor? by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    turn in your nerd credentials for thinking that would work

    additionally, flight data recorders do send out a ping for 30 days:

    http://boingboing.net/2009/06/03/miles-obrien-bloggin.html

    The submersible will be listening for the distinctive "pinging" noise that these boxes are designed to emit once they are submerged in water. They are supposed to "ping" for thirty days in water as deep as 20,000 feet. Sonar used by surface ships is only good to about a thousand feet of depth - so it is essential to send some "ears" deep beneath the sea in order to find the boxes. These sonar devices can be towed by ships or ply the deep on their own power.

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  5. Re:I don't get this by 0123456 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Does somebody know why it's so hard for them to find it? I would assume that it's properly secured against crashes, and has a GPS/transmitter on board? What causes this to be so hard?

    Inside the data recorder it's attached to a pinger which sends out a sound pulse on a regular basis for about a month after a crash; that makes it easy to find if the recorder stays intact and it's in relatively shallow water, but in this case it's so far down that the pinger was barely audible during the first search (it wasn't detected during the search and only found by post-search processing of the recorded audio data) and the various layers in the ocean reflect sound so it's hard to track. Obviously the batteries died long ago so the only way to find it now was to look for an orange cylinder on the seabed.

  6. Re:I don't get this by BronsCon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Got a GPS?
    Good.
    Now, go jump in a lake with it.

    Where are you? What? No GPS lock? Oh, that's ok, it still transmits its last known coordinates and you shouldn't be too far from there; I'll just use that signal. Oh... wait, there's no signal. Hmm, that LARGE BODY OF WATER must be blocking it.

    No bother, anyway, those coordinates would only be accurate enough to tell me you're at the crash site; something I already know.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  7. Re:Now they're looking for the voice recorder? by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 2

    The voice recorder may be completely destroyed. Keeping them separate decreases the possibility that a single force or impact will destroy both units.

    Same reason enterprise IT departments (should) maintain multiple, separate backups of critical data.

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
  8. Why not replicate the recorders to each other ? by MarkTina · · Score: 2

    Why if you have 2 flight recorders do they not have the voice replicate to the data and the data to the voice ... that way it you find one you have the complete data set.

    I know "crazy talk" but I'm a storage bod and it irks me when people lose VERY important data!

    1. Re:Why not replicate the recorders to each other ? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Informative

      Development cycles in Aviation are very long. Technology used is generally very old but well proven. Both recorders are probably jam packed with data with no room to spare and no free space to double up. The newer systems being designed will transmit the data which would now be recorded so it won't have to be scraped off the bottom of the Atlantic.

  9. Re:Euro is both singular and plural! by Richy_T · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But this is the English language. Not only will we add an "s", we might even throw in an apostrophe or two for good measure.

  10. Re:Euro is both singular and plural! by jd · · Score: 2

    Only if you're a grocer.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  11. Re:I don't get this by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you're close enough to see a flashing LED you're close enough to see the wreckage. The ping is audible (with the right equipment) through thousands of feet of muddy water. Sound travels farther than light in the ocean.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  12. Re:I don't get this by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 2

    But sound travels MUCH farther underwater than light will...

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  13. Re:Flight Recorders are Sooo 20th Century by slyborg · · Score: 2

    What happens if (I know this never happens in real life, LOL) but hypothetically, what happens if something interrupts the communication from the plane, say for example when it is upside-down in a raging thunderstorm plunging towards the ocean surface?

    You would still need a backup flight recorder. The advantage of the inflight system is that you might obviate having to find wreckage in a case like the Air France flight, but in exchange you would have to be constantly storing telemetry data from thousands of commercial flights a day; this would cost more on a yearly basis than spending $20M to send bots to the ocean floor for the once in a generation crash like this.

  14. Re:I don't get this by Solandri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now, go jump in a lake with it.

    Where are you? What? No GPS lock?

    During an underwater robotics conference I attended, one of the presenters was describing their attempt at using GPS for location fixes every time their autonomous underwater vehicle surfaced in the ocean. They ended up trashing the idea because they found that as little 5 mm of seawater on top of the GPS antenna would prevent a GPS lock.

  15. Re:I don't get this by fnj · · Score: 2

    That's funny. An intelligently designed autonomous underwater vehicle seems to have no trouble getting GPS fixes when surfaced.

  16. Re:Euro is both singular and plural! by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2

    But this is the English language. Not only will we add an "s", we might even throw in an apostrophe or two for good measure.

    I'd give you a bonus "e" for no extra charge!

    --
    I am not a crackpot.