Slashdot Mirror


FAA Wants Your Opinion On Commercial Space Rules

coondoggie writes "If you have an opinion about how you think the commercial space flight world should be regulated, the FAA wants to hear from you. On Thursday, May 26, 2011 at the DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Cocoa Beach Oceanfront in Florida it will hold a public hearing where the FAA says it wants to gather information about how to define what it calls a regulatory framework for orbital human spaceflight."

9 of 160 comments (clear)

  1. Rule #1 by somethingwicked · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No exploding

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

  2. Safety Nazis by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How about they don't regulate it to death. Spaceflight will be a dangerous undertaking for quite some time. If they try to regulate away all the danger they will make it impossible for any advancement to take place.
    (car analogy)If the first cars buit were required to have all the safety features we find on modern cars, we would all still be riding horses.(/car analogy)

    --
    If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  3. Re:No jurisdiction by VanGarrett · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At the moment, no one has jurisdiction. It's a wild-ass frontier up there. However, it is reasonable to assume that the USA's FAA should have some authority over space vehicles taking off and landing in American lands. Furthermore, it is also reasonable to suppose that the FAA will be likely to have some input or influence on what rules are put into place, when the requisite international body is formed for managing orbital and interstellar flights, as I would also expect other flight safety agencies from around the world to have.

  4. Re:so how many people will have to die before safe by 0123456 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    so how many people will have to die before for some safety rules are in place?

    3007.

    Back in the real world, pushing rules that expect 99.99999% safety would simply kill the industry in America and hand space travel over to the Chinese or some other country which is happy for people to make their own decision about whether they think a flight is safe. All that's really required is some basic standard that companies have to meet to avoid punitive lawsuits when someone does die.

  5. Re:No jurisdiction by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 3, Informative

    The hell they don't, the mandate of the FAA is to regulate and oversee all aspects of civil aviation in the U.S. Aviation includes everything from zero to 50 miles up for the US regulators.

  6. Re:America by the_humeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Killing business before it even starts. The US is probably the most unfriendly country in the world to start a business in. Then you wonder why there's no growth.

    Blatant falsehood. We're the third best country to start a business in.

  7. Re:America by Cutriss · · Score: 4, Funny

    Killing business before it even starts. The US is probably the most unfriendly country in the world to start a business in. Then you wonder why there's no growth.

    Blatant falsehood. We're the third best country to start a business in.

    Facts don't matter to trolls! Just sunlight and bridges.

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
  8. Yeah, I have a suggestion: by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Keep the TSA the hell away from it.

  9. Re:so how many people will have to die before safe by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All that's really required is some basic standard that companies have to meet to avoid punitive lawsuits when someone does die.

    Yeah. Something like regulations. Or maybe rules. Or a framework. By a governmental agency with appropriate jurisdiction.

    Great idea!

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!