Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Caught Exposing Millions of Credentials

fysdt writes "Facebook has leaked photographs, profiles and other personal information for millions of its users because of a years-old bug that overrides individual privacy settings, researchers from Symantec said. The flaw, which the researchers estimate has affected hundreds of thousands of applications, exposed user access tokens to advertisers and others. The tokens serve as a spare set of keys that Facebook apps use to perform certain actions on behalf of the user, such as posting messages to a Facebook wall or sending RSVP replies to invitations. For years, many apps that rely on an older form of user authentication turned over these keys to third parties, giving them the ability to access information users specifically designated as off limits."

98 of 159 comments (clear)

  1. They're still operating ... by 0racle · · Score: 1

    ... so isn't this kind of a 'well duh' moment?

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    1. Re:They're still operating ... by Kelbear · · Score: 2

      More likely, they don't care.

      The few that do expect privacy will see this, have a momentary sense of outrage, and then forget about it.

      They'll continue to use facebook because they're really not all that concerned about their privacy. At most Facebook may make a statement about how they're continually improving security, and then it will be business as usual.

    2. Re:They're still operating ... by Skarecrow77 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't have any facebook apps installed. not a one.

      I don't answer any surveys or take any polls.

      I painstakingly go through every privacy setting and set to "friends only".

      I post as little truly personal information as possible. No phone number, no address, no high school, college, or place of current employment, none of it.

      and I'm still pretty sure that facebook has still somehow probably derived all of my info down to my underwear color, porn preferences, and whether I ate lucky charms for dinner last night, and sold that to advertisers.

    3. Re:They're still operating ... by sarysa · · Score: 1

      Funny to see I'm not the only one who felt exhausted and in an "eff it, I give up" mood after reading the summary.

      That said, unless this one gets picked up by the major networks, most users will remain unaware of it. Geeks like us, followed by news junkies, followed by everyone else (especially kids and adolescents) make up a scale from intense awareness to utter cluelessness re: Facebook's privacy practices.

      --
      Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
    4. Re:They're still operating ... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 3, Funny

      The other side of the basement is neither, and, let's face it, you aren't going to climb the stairs over this.

    5. Re:They're still operating ... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Uh-huh - a social network. Much like a local area network. You'll have no objection if I browse my way through your local area network, will you?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    6. Re:They're still operating ... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      Ditto. No apps, no invites, no surveys, I ignore those stupid "Someone answered a question about you" yada yada yada. Half my personal data is false, the other half misleading. And, I still don't really expect privacy. Like yourself, I'm sure Facebook has sold everything that's on my page, and knows who I am based on the people I know. Phhht.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    7. Re:They're still operating ... by Samalie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I find this wrong (obviously), but at least in my personal case, I assume that everything I ever put on FB is there for the entire world to see, regardless of my own privacy settings.

      I care about my privacy...I just don't see Facebook as even remotely "private"

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    8. Re:They're still operating ... by Broolucks · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Until people get bitten by personal information being leaked to the wrong people, they will not care about their privacy. If your private photos get leaked to your employer and there are allusions or consequences that embarrass you, you might get mad enough about it to stop using the service. If they get leaked to faceless corporations that will crunch the data to suck as much money as possible out of you and your friends with targeted advertising, the connection is fuzzy, remote, indirect, and it is unlikely you will care at all. For 99.99% of people, the lack of privacy will have no effect they can relate to their use of the service. The remainder might get into trouble, but 0.01% of users has no pull. And if the whole of society was to get into trouble because of things like this getting out of hand, the responsibility will be diluted among everyone - ergo, still, nobody cares.

      In short, people care about their privacy versus the core of people they interact with or might interact with in the future. Outside of that core, their information might be distributed on flyers in the streets of Bangkok for all they care. At best they will be momentarily disturbed by the thought.

    9. Re:They're still operating ... by rwa2 · · Score: 2

      Ha, if you post anything to Facebook that you wouldn't post on your old skool Geocities public website or whatever, then you fail the internets.

      People look at Zuckerberg like he's some kind of freak that doesn't respect privacy. And he's looking back at a whole bunch of people complaining that the stuff that they posted on the internet... is out on the internet.

      If you really want to share something secret, use hushmail or something. Facebook, OTOH, is all about syndication... letting your personal thoughts and habits reach as many people as possible... people who wouldn't have given a rat's ass about what you were saying or doing otherwise. If your information is reaching a wide audience, then you're WINNING :-D

    10. Re:They're still operating ... by molnarcs · · Score: 1

      So is this the sign that Facebook is turning into Myspace - gazillion of apps, horrible UI, and becoming a SPAM platform. And just finished my blog about why I ditched facebook a few hours ago: http://eyesbeyond.blogspot.com/2011/05/who-viewed-your-profile-on-facebook-and.html

    11. Re:They're still operating ... by mr1911 · · Score: 1

      Since you posted as AC the "Uppity asshole" portion came through as part of your post rather than your sig.

      --
      This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
      Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
    12. Re:They're still operating ... by ArundelCastle · · Score: 1

      and I'm still pretty sure that facebook has still somehow probably derived all of my info down to my underwear color, porn preferences, and whether I ate lucky charms for dinner last night, and sold that to advertisers.

      If you start seeing sidebar ads for Tin Foil Hats, THAT'S when I'd be concerned.

    13. Re:They're still operating ... by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      "If they get leaked to faceless corporations that will crunch the data to suck as much money as possible out of you and your friends with targeted advertising, the connection is fuzzy, remote, indirect, and it is unlikely you will care at all. "

      Up until you then show them their purchases using said targetted advertising and then say in big old-school letters "Data! Yum!"

      Dammit, it's neck and neck now, web 2.0 is almost over. We're into Web 3.0 soon, with the privacy invasions assisted by .gov, but (soon I hope?) after that will be a privacy rebellon which should be glorious.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    14. Re:They're still operating ... by Jessified · · Score: 2

      I feel like we have this exact same conversation every time Facebook is mentioned. It would be really interesting to cross section the first 10 posts of every Facebook related submissions.

  2. Thanks a lot Mark.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are you sure you want to unfriend Mark Zuckerberg? (Yes/No)

    1. Re:Thanks a lot Mark.... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia Mark Zuckerberg unfriends you!

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  3. Already Resolved? by trunicated · · Score: 1

    I was forced to log back into my Facebook account on my phone out of the blue last Friday. Perhaps that was them revoking access to all the old offline tokens?

    --
    There's a reason there is no "Disagree" mod...
  4. Meh.. by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1, Insightful

    FB is overrated anyway. And waay too many people use it as if it were their Twitter account.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    1. Re:Meh.. by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I don't really need my wall filled up with silly little things like "going to bed now" or "Off to the gym, cya all in a bit" or "Damn, I'm out of toilet paper!" or "OMG I just got gang-raped, someone please call 911".. it's just too much clutter.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    2. Re:Meh.. by phatphoton · · Score: 1

      Then that might say something about your friends or your status filters....you do know you can block content from people who tend to abuse it...right?

    3. Re:Meh.. by rmstar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not that I disagree, but tell me what is the "proper" way the use FaceBook?

      The Zen way. You stand by instead of using it, and watch with compassion how the rest of humanity does something really stupid.

    4. Re:Meh.. by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

      Where are my mod points?!?

      I have actually started deleting people who post a lot of stuff in a short amount of time. If you have to post every thought that passes through you're head I have no interest in knowing you.

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    5. Re:Meh.. by phatphoton · · Score: 1

      Lets use Incliq! or something like it. The only real way to ensure privacy is through a ssh/https tunnel to/from your friends' own servers...and with the $25 PC...all your friends having their own servers wouldn't be too nerdy....right?

    6. Re:Meh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I use Facebook to keep in touch with patients and other health care professionals (chiropractors, homeopaths, acupuncturists, etc.)

      Let me fix that for you ....

      I use Facebook to keep in touch with patients and other quacks and dispensers of expensive placebos that have absolutely no scientific evidence to back their efficacy (chiropractors, homeopaths, acupuncturists, etc.)

      There you go ....

    7. Re:Meh.. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

      FB is overrated anyway. And waay too many people use it as if it were their Twitter account.

      The big downside to Facebook around here is that it requires friends.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    8. Re:Meh.. by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      *poke*

      Is he a troll? I can't tell. He's so life-like.

    9. Re:Meh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      FB is overrated anyway. And waay too many people use it as if it were their Twitter account.

      The big downside to Facebook around here is that it requires friends.

      You keep using that word, "friends", in the context of Facebook. I don't think it means what you think it means.

    10. Re:Meh.. by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2

      You are trolling right?

      Chiropractors, homeopaths, acupuncturists, etc are "health care professionals" while science is quackery "vaccine pushers, big pharma, etc".

    11. Re:Meh.. by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Hey that homeopathic stuff is pretty cool. Guaranteed by them to have almost absolutely nothing in them.
      To every only of those homeopathic con men I would love to sell some homeopathic gold.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    12. Re:Meh.. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      "watch with compassion how the rest of humanity does something really stupid" because someday, you may need to do something really stupid!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    13. Re:Meh.. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Actually it does mean what I think it means. The difference is that I have actual friends on my list instead of collecting confirmations like they're Pokemon.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    14. Re:Meh.. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      FB is overrated anyway. And waay too many people use it as if it were their Twitter account.

      Uh, FB as Twitter? My apologies, I was unaware that I was polishing that FB turd the wrong way. Should I polish it in the same counterclockwise direction that the Twitter software spells out in it's specifications, or is this location-dependent? I am north of the equator.

      Translation: Facebook...Twitter...it's all the same shit

    15. Re:Meh.. by Samalie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Treat it as if it is a giant billboard hovering above the earth that every single human being on the planet can see and read.

      I use FB to keep up with a large number of poeple scattered around the globe that I gave a shit about. It is a casual way to be a part of the life of people I care about that I can't be close to.

      I don't post pictures, play games, use apps, say stupid shit about my boss/employer, etc. People that do deserve to have their personal shit posted around the globe.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    16. Re:Meh.. by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd like to make a new service called Twatter. That way, when you send out a messages, your Twatting, and an individual message is a Twat.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    17. Re:Meh.. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      What are you, a rap video?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    18. Re:Meh.. by mr1911 · · Score: 1

      Not that I disagree, but tell me what is the "proper" way the use FaceBook?

      Don't

      --
      This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
      Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
    19. Re:Meh.. by he-sk · · Score: 1

      It means that they are broadcasting to the whole world -- which is the whole point of Twitter since "following" is non-symmetric and Twitter user streams are (usually) public. That behavior is not really appropriate on Facebook, since you can't broadcast to the world unless it has "friended" you back and Facebook user walls are (usually) private. All you achieve is spamming your friends.

      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
    20. Re:Meh.. by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Like the fact that they just got a hamburger and it was tasty

      This makes me hungry.

  5. Facebook should be fined. by grahamsaa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There should be a law requiring a fine for each user who's personal information is compromised as a result of bugs like this. My bet is that if there were, this type of thing would happen far less often. Of course, Facebook isn't the only company guilty of this type of thing -- and I suspect that until there is some serious consequence associated with this type of security hole, most companies won't take it seriously enough.

    --
    Facts have a liberal bias.
    1. Re:Facebook should be fined. by KhabaLox · · Score: 2

      There should be a law requiring a fine for each user who's personal information is compromised as a result of bugs like this.

      Well, that would kill the internet pretty quickly, so it would certainly solve the problem I suppose.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    2. Re:Facebook should be fined. by rhizome · · Score: 1

      From what has been seen of Zuckerberg's ethics, I'd say it's just about even money that this was a completely intentional feature to help get his advertising buddies all that juicy demographic info they pay him so well for.

      I think the OP's point was: "there should be a law."

      However, the people most agitated by this are too busy reading Slashdot to make a phone call.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    3. Re:Facebook should be fined. by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Yeah right. If they don't fine companies for exposing people's credit card numbers and SSNs, there's no way they're going to do it for exposing someone's DOB or address (which are generally public information to begin with).

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    4. Re:Facebook should be fined. by Amouth · · Score: 1

      if that where so - any company with half a brain would realize it would be cheaper to relocate to another country (that would love to have them)

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    5. Re:Facebook should be fined. by vivin · · Score: 1

      That's a very good idea. Something like PCI requirements, but for personal information.

      --
      Vivin Suresh Paliath
      http://vivin.net

      I like
    6. Re:Facebook should be fined. by KhabaLox · · Score: 1

      Many of us had websites that didn't have to prostitute personal data to stay around and we still don't

      Except, we're not talking about selling private information to unauthorized 3rd parties (though based on the ToS you sign to use most sites, it's probably impossible for them to do so as "unauthorized 3rd parties" as such don't exist). We're talk (in the GP and TFS) about bugs that cause data to be disclosed. And the logical extension would be to extend it to parties like Sony whose lack security standards put user data at risk.

      If you put companies on the hook (to a serious degree per user) for any accidental disclosure, or disclosure by buggy software or inept/inadequate policies, then no new companies will be likely to come onto the scene.

      I agree that companies need to bear responsibility for sensitive data they hold, but you have to be careful in enacting such regulations. You can very easily discourage all new development if any breach of a website will force that company to declare bankruptcy.

      (Disclaimer: I'm generally very liberal and not trustful of corporations.)

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    7. Re:Facebook should be fined. by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and so is your name. HIPAA doesn't have anything to do with whether something's public or private or not. It's legislation surrounding your medical records.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    8. Re:Facebook should be fined. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      You assume that this was a bug. From what has been seen of Zuckerberg's ethics, I'd say it's just about even money that this was a completely intentional feature to help get his advertising buddies all that juicy demographic info they pay him so well for.

      Ah, but if they got the info without paying for it, Zuckerberg would certainly consider it a bug. Probably the highest-priority kind of bug.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  6. Join the crowd by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    Get thee to Congress and testify!

    1. Re:Join the crowd by TemperedAlchemist · · Score: 5, Funny

      I thought we wanted to fix the problem.

    2. Re:Join the crowd by sjames · · Score: 1

      He made the common mistake of equating "doing something about" with solving the problem of.

  7. This study was delayed by drsmack1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Researchers note that they would have released this study much sooner, but their PCs were hamstrung by Norton Internet Security.

    1. Re:This study was delayed by internerdj · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Researchers note that they would have released this study much sooner" Well they should have just posted the study to their facebook profiles as a private note then.

    2. Re:This study was delayed by drsmack1 · · Score: 1

      Your post wins for funniest.

  8. Bound to happen by softWare3ngineer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These types of errors are bound to keep happening. Software is to large to find and fix everything. Not saying that it is right, or developers should give up, or software should generally be more secure than it is. But maybe we as users should keep this in mind when we put anything up on the Internet. Especially when dealing with sites like facebook.

    1. Re:Bound to happen by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      I bet you'd have no problem finding security flaws in Commodore 64's GEOS. Or KolibriOS. It's so frickin' small that it's humanly possible to scan every line of code for security holes.

      Which is the key I think - software needs to be less bloated, so it's easier to debug.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    2. Re:Bound to happen by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Software is too large to find and fix everything."

      That's what Sony said.

    3. Re:Bound to happen by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I bet you'd have no problem finding security flaws in Commodore 64's GEOS.

      No doubt. I'm sure it would be even easier to find security flaws in a 1KB ZX81 program, but you're not going to be able to write anything that'll even begin to meet Facebook's server requirements in something of comparable size to either, so it's a pointless example.

      Anyway, people hold up 8-bit code as a paragon of efficiency all the time. And it was... as far as it went. But 8-bit programs were generally very limited in what they could do, and it's impractical to use that design style for larger, more modern programs.

      Plus, efficient use of machine resources and readability/maintainability are not mutual bedfellows. 8-bit code was often fast and memory-efficient because it used lots of tricks and minimal-OS/hitting-the-bare-metal type hacks. Try writing something modern and complex to the same level of tightness that made 1K ZX Chess possible and it might be a fraction of the size (of the actual present-day app) but it'd still be huge, unreadable and far *more* opaque than the standard version.

      Which is the key I think - software needs to be less bloated, so it's easier to debug.

      AFAIK, the "bloat" in Facebook's case is as much down to the fact it was poorly-designed in the first place and (I assume) that the functionality was based around adding to and mutating this original codebase.

      And do you mean "bloat" in terms of size of source code, or bloat in terms of the final result?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re:Bound to happen by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>people hold up 8-bit code

      Kolibri OS is not 8 bit mister "I don't read before replying" or use his brain. It's 32 bit, fits on a floppy, and is perfectly capable of running a facebook server. And therefore is easy to find security holes.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    5. Re:Bound to happen by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Kolibri OS is not 8 bit mister "I don't read before replying" or use his brain.

      What makes your childish reponse more laughable and ironic is that if *you'd* been paying attention, you'd notice that the section quoted did not include mention of the Kolibri OS, because I wasn't replying to that, but specifically the part about the 8-bit Commodore 64. Is that clear enough for you "mister"?!

      That said, I *did* investigate Kolibri OS after you mentioned it. Regardless of how tightly it is coded, or how suitable it would be for running Facebook's server code, it does *not* follow that because the OS itself is efficiently-written, that all apps will automatically be so too.

      And the "8-bit" coding style critique I made referred to the philosophy, which *could* be applied to 32 and 64-bit code, but would be nightmarish to develop on that scale. Kolibri OS might be tightly coded, but is it as tightly-coded as 1K ZX Chess? I doubt it, because it would be impossible to develop something on even *that* scale to that level of efficiency. Which pretty much proves my point that some "bloat" is inevitable as you scale up.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  9. It's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Working as intended

  10. Dog Bites Man, News at Eleven. by spun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Somebody needs to take a refresher course in "What is this 'news" thing, anyway?" Something that happens with utter predictability and regularity, like a dog biting a man, is never really news. But if a man were to bite a dog, or Facebook was caught protecting user information, then that would be news.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Dog Bites Man, News at Eleven. by kvothe · · Score: 1

      While what you say is true, there is still value in being reminded that such evils still exist in the world, rather than becoming bored and sweeping them under the rug.

    2. Re:Dog Bites Man, News at Eleven. by ArundelCastle · · Score: 1

      While what you say is true, there is still value in being reminded that such evils still exist in the world, rather than becoming bored and sweeping them under the rug.

      "Publicity is justly commended as a remedy for social and industrial diseases. Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman."
      ~ Justice Louis Brandeis, 1914

    3. Re:Dog Bites Man, News at Eleven. by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Somebody needs to take a refresher course in "What is this 'news" thing, anyway?" Something that happens with utter predictability and regularity, like a dog biting a man, is never really news. But if a man were to bite a dog, or Facebook was caught protecting user information, then that would be news.

      Welcome to Slashbook, the web site dedicated to News for Facebook.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    4. Re:Dog Bites Man, News at Eleven. by spun · · Score: 1

      She's dead. And cremated. A bit chalky, don't you think?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    5. Re:Dog Bites Man, News at Eleven. by kvothe · · Score: 1

      While I would applaud your effort in supplying that quotation, I would also say that seeing and acknowledging that there is a problem are important first steps to then seeking remedy, just as it is helpful to be able see a crime being committed if you wish to then apprehend the criminal.

  11. Did the attackers leave their name and address? by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

    No? must be anon, it was an impossible to thwart attack, the 13 year olds are to blame not facebook.

  12. Use this thread by Troy · · Score: 4, Funny

    to make a self-righteous post about how you don't use Facebook, and anyone who does is stupid.

    1. Re:Use this thread by DeadlyMind · · Score: 1

      I don't use Facebook, and anyone who does is stupid.

    2. Re:Use this thread by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      I don't use Facebook. However I know several people who use it who are seriously hot (the fact that most of these people are stupid is out of scope to the point I was making).

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  13. Anonymous Coward isn't safe either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Your writing style will get you tracked. I remember when trolling a few years ago that someone guessed what ISP I was using.due to cross checks on multiple sites. If you are alive, your atoms will be tracked.

  14. Re:Kill the Internet by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Watch out when Copyright Superclick comes into law. By that I mean the various forms of the laws that would make streaming/accessing/viewing anything not the authorized source into a crime.

    I am floating the proposal that we make personal information just as prickly as copyrighted work. Then if Z had to pay $875,000 per shared profile times 20 million profiles he would wake up.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  15. Poisoning the well by HangingChad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I assume Facebook is being back-doored by the feds, assume they sell information to advertisers, so the only difference here is that it was unintentional. So I keep my FB profile loaded with inaccurate, out of date information. Just seems like the best way to hide a tree is in a forest of misleading information.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  16. Privacy thoughts by AnonymmousCoward · · Score: 1

    You should have no reasonable expectation of privacy when posting ANYTHING to a social networking website.

    1. Re:Privacy thoughts by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      You should have no reasonable expectation of privacy when posting ANYTHING to a social networking website.

      Absolutely right, Bob Walcott of 5098 Clay Street, Denver Colorado 80601, height 5 ft 8 weight 280 lbs, favorite soft drink coca-cola mixed with green koolaid, recently married until dinosaur pr0n collection discovered by wife.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Privacy thoughts by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Link or it didn't happen...the Dino Pron, I could care less about Bob Walcott.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Privacy thoughts by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Of course you do, don't be daft.

      Just bear in mind privacy is about relationships.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Privacy thoughts by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      So mixing Coca-cola and green koolaid is true?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:Privacy thoughts by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Google it your own damn self. Yes, it's out there. No, I didn't follow the links.

  17. Facebook shocked, *shocked* at privacy breaches by David+Gerard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Facebook staff have been amazed to discover that when Facebook passes users' complete details to application developers and advertisers like candy, some of the partner companies might accidentally let slip the information in some manner.

    "We are appalled at this information leak," said Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg as he took a break from his personal RSS feed of drunk women's tits posted to his service. "But I can assure you that we have sternly suggested to everyone involved that they take somewhat greater care not to get caught, and maintain a serious demeanor when rolling around in the great big pit filled with money in their basement."

    "I'm horrified and outraged," said office worker Brenda Busybody, 43 (IQ), "that stuff I put on the Internet is on the Internet. It violates everything I expect. I want privacy when I'm calling my boss a useless fuckstick to the entire world, all my coworkers and my boss himself. And when I'm playing a bit of FarmVille before we nick off down the pub."

    Privacy advocates are working on Diaspora, a security-enhanced social network so far populated by Linux users who cryptographically sign every update about which episode of Babylon 5 they just finished watching alone in their parents' basement. "START PGP KEY BLOCK!" said open source software advocate Hiram Nerdboy, 17. "WE WILL PROTECT YOUR FREEDOMS!" The next version of Diaspora will allow users to list more than three friends, should there be any demand whatsoever for such a feature.

    Facebook works on the now-standard "Web 2.0” business model: 1. Brutally sodomise the personal privacy of anyone who comes within a mile of your service and say "hey baby, I'm sorry" every time you're busted. 2. Sell ads.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
    1. Re:Facebook shocked, *shocked* at privacy breaches by chittychitty!! · · Score: 1

      Helpful tip: know your audience. You'd have easliy gotten a Score:5, Funny but for the Diaspora remarks which hit too close to home.

    2. Re:Facebook shocked, *shocked* at privacy breaches by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

      You're right. I should have included something about showering.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    3. Re:Facebook shocked, *shocked* at privacy breaches by Limburgher · · Score: 1

      You mean *GPG* key block? ;)

      --

      You are not the customer.

    4. Re:Facebook shocked, *shocked* at privacy breaches by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

      ... Bother. You are, sir, 100% correct. Someone upvote parent.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
  18. Re:Technology Makes Men Gods.. and Spycoders by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    He's worse than an incubus.

    He's a fucking suit.

    And he doesn't have nearly enough facial scars. Someone needs to get working on that.

  19. That's Progress by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 1

    Throughout history, we have given a wide berth to those who have made great leaps in technology. This is nothing compared with the railroads' liberties with property and human lives, same goes for mechanized automation, commercial shipping, and, of course, weaponry. We are entitled to get all verklempt over these things, but the world moves on anyway. Just feel lucky if you have not (yet) been crushed under the wheels of progress.

    BTW, there is a benefit to falsifying everything about yourself on your Facebook page.

    1. Re:That's Progress by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      BTW, there is a benefit to falsifying everything about yourself on your Facebook page.

      Doesn't stop your sister posting "Hey brother why haven't you responded to my family request??"

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
  20. Use this sub-thread by ArundelCastle · · Score: 1

    to make a self-righteous post about how you don't use Windows, and anyone who does is stupid.

    The lions. I beard them.

    1. Re:Use this sub-thread by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I don't use Windows (except when it's appropriate to do so), and people who use it (without critically assessing their own needs from an OS and making an informed decision) are stupid.

      As for Facebook...it's just stupid. I stopped using it and deactivated my account.

  21. Obligatory XKCD by thepike · · Score: 2
  22. Business Model by merky1 · · Score: 1

    Isn't Facebook's entire valuation based on violating user privacy? The ad piece of the business probably pales in comparison to being able to "accidentally" expose thoroughly mined and indexed personal information. It is probably the same thing for Zygna, the world's highest grossing "GAME" company, slowly recycling Pavlov's finest experiments.

    --
    --WooooHoooo--
  23. Re:Jail Time by MadMaverick9 · · Score: 1

    Why are they responsible? They are a company and they want to make money. Which is reasonable me thinks.

    You choose to use the services of FB and the likes. So you are responsible. You are responsible for the choices you make in life.

    If you care about your privacy, then stop putting all your personal information on somebody else's website.

    Facebook works on the now-standard "Web 2.0" business model: 1. Brutally sodomise the personal privacy of anyone who comes within a mile of your service and say "hey baby, I'm sorry" every time you're busted. 2. Sell ads.

    If that's the new "standard", than this world is screwed up badly.

    And I refuse to go along.

  24. Turn off Facebook "apps" by Animats · · Score: 1

    Go to Facebook -> Account -> Apps and Web Sites -> Edit Your Settings ->Apps You Use -> Turn Off Platform Apps.

    Even that doesn't stop everything. Go to Account-> Privacy Settings -> Block LIsts. This is where you see the list of apps you've blocked from contacting you when run by others. But you can't actually block anything from there. You have to find the Facebook page of the annoying app (for example, FarmVille) and then click on "Block App". Now, no more annoying Farmville messages. You may also have to find "Zynga's Players Community" and block that, too. Also, for Foursquare, you need to block both Foursquare and Foursquare Badges.

    Yes, you have to do all this just to block the companies whose apps have the intrusion level of an anal probe.

  25. Comment from Facebook Developer Relations by Cat+Lee · · Score: 2

    Hey guys - I work on the Dev Relations team at Facebook. We appreciate Symantec raising this issue and we worked with them to address it immediately as the article mentioned. Unfortunately, their resulting report has some inaccuracies. Specifically, we've conducted a thorough investigation which revealed no evidence of this issue resulting in a user's private information being shared with unauthorized third parties. In addition, this report ignores the contractual obligations of advertisers and developers which prohibit them from sharing user information in a way that violates our policies. Lastly, the change we announced today on our developer blog (https://developers.facebook.com/blog/post/497) removes the outdated API referred to in Symantec's report.

  26. Facebook Caught Exposing Millions of Credentials by netflusher · · Score: 1

    Average Joe/Jane won't read it, and even if they do they'll think it's bullshit, or they will say that they don't have anything to hide on the Interwebz.

  27. Re:facepalm by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

    Post it and mark it as "private". Then everyone should be able to see it.

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  28. you get what you pay for by blackair · · Score: 1

    I don't put anything on a site like Facebook, Twitter or myspace even here that would bother me if it got out. I don't pay to use them so i expect hiccups and bug and hacks often. No if it was something like my evernote account which i pay for I would have pitchfork in hand ready to crucify their CTO & CEO for me research or personal info getting out.