Slashdot Mirror


Google Lobbies Nevada To Allow Self-Driving Cars

b0bby writes "The NY Times reports that Google is quietly lobbying for legislation that would make Nevada the first state in which self-driving cars could be legally operated on public roads. 'The two bills, which have received little attention outside Nevada's capitol, are being introduced less than a year after the giant search engine company acknowledged that it was developing cars that could be safely driven without human intervention.'"

4 of 275 comments (clear)

  1. Do this in Nevada! by cvtan · · Score: 5, Funny

    In NY, all self-driving cars will have drivers after they have been on the road for a hour or so. They will not necessarily return home.

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
  2. 1 bug / 100,000 mile - I'll take that by OnTheEdge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Only one error in 100,000 miles -- I'll take that in a heartbeat over the thoughtless people I drive beside each day. I guarantee the best drivers have more than 1 bug in 100K miles.

    1. Re:1 bug / 100,000 mile - I'll take that by sincewhen · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't have bugs, I have race conditions!

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
  3. Re:Not yet. by ACS+Solver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Society is going to be the problem here anyway. People are going to freak out at cases where the driving AI is responsible for a fatal accident. A quick search shows that 33808 people died in road accidents in the US, in 2009. And that's apparently a 60-year low. This still translates to some 92 traffic fatalities per day. But society accepts that... whereas I'm sure they would freak out if a full transition to self-driving cars happened, with the driver AI being responsible for 1 fatality per day. Fatality numbers could go down by almost two orders of magnitude, but people would feel less safe on the road because of "killer cars" out there.

    I feel this is a big problem overall - people are willing to accept human controlled systems where the human factor regularly leads to accidents/injuries/deaths, but if that system can be automated with a much lower accident/injury/death rate, the society would not feel it's safe.