Worm Descendants From Columbia Disaster Relaunched
astroengine writes "In 2003, Space Shuttle Columbia burned up on reentry, killing all seven astronauts on board. However, from the wreckage, a sample of C. elegans worms survived. On Monday, descendants from the worms that survived the disaster were launched on board Endeavour for experiments on the space station. 'C. elegans is a common, well-studied organism used in biomedical research as a model for human development, genetics, aging and disease,' says NASA. 'The organism shares many essential biological characteristics found in human biology.'"
Let's hope the little bastards didn't cause the crash.
"Take us into zero-g, will you!"
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
At first I thought it was related to Columbia, the country.
Then I was like, heh, maybe it's about the Worms videogame (Worms: Descendants?)
Finally, after RTFS, I still don't know what this means for space exploration or the earthworms in specific.
I guess this will force some folks to RTFA...
Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
The worms were saying "Fuck, we dodged a bullet on the Columbia, eh boys? What the fuck? Where are they bringing us? Oh damn."
I mean they rather work this cool satellite
trying extra-hard to prove that correlation is not causation.
"The last time these worms went up, the shuttle crashed. But we're gonna prove the two facts aren't related! LIFTOFF!"
Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
Is the "descendants" of some apparently pretty common worms that are well studied really worth sending into space? I wouldn't be so anti NASA if they quit wasting our time and money on flat out bullshit. Instead of packing these missions (commercials) with "this is your last chance to do anything meaningful with the shuttle, make it count" type of things we are sprouting seeds in space, watching worms float, and dragging junk up to the ISS cause no one else can (due to contracts, politics and nothing else)
Holy crap. My automatic, summary-summarizing brain routines skipped the title and the clause containing a date (which I guess I unconsciously find unimportant) and read the first sentence as, "Space Shuttle burned up on reentry, killing all seven astronauts on board." Turns out the story was about worms. Phew.
what of anal worms?
Sorry...
"This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
Perhaps they are breeding for luck?
"First we tried breeding spacemen that could survive a crash. Well, that didn't work. So now we're breeding worms that can survive a crash."
I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
When asked about this achievement for C. elegans, the species did not respond, instead opting to reproduce asexual for a period of three to five days.
They didn't make the crew wear red shirts again, did they?
... somewhere is thinking "Whew, glad I'm not going again."
but as a practical matter, the worms didn't survive a re-entry by themselves. If you threw a handful of worms from orbit down toward the earth, all of them would burn up in the atmosphere and DIE. They survived the Columbia accident because they were encased in some kind of container that didn't get fully vaporized during re-entry.
We've put microscopic WORMS in low Earth orbit! Clearly we can build space elevators now! AHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!
I sure as heck would have been a solid NO.
I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
Oh Shit Oh Shit Oh Shit
The classification C. elegans is short for Caenorhabditis elegans(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_elegans). You would normally only abbreviate the genus if you have already written it in its full form (thus first mention should be of Caenorhabditis elegans and all further mentions can be C. elegans. TFA does this, but the summary should mention Caenorhabditis elegans first before launching into abbreviations.
OK, all those reasons are sound, but they also hold for hermaphrodites which would be sexually symmetrical (do bidirectional exchange of genes). What reason makes specialized inseminators superior to more symmetrical model of procreation? Faster rubber-stamping of successful genes?
Not just unharmed, some of the worms actually seemed to develop improved abilities after the shuttle crash. One could stretch itself to extreme lengths (though that's not uncommon for worms), another could become transparent. A third could spontaneously burst into flames and a fourth could become a hard rock-like thing. I think it's absolutely fantastic.
Support Right To Repair Legislation.
Hmmm. Lone survivors of the crash.
Should we be worried that some super-villainous worm is out there somewhere? Or are they so fragile it doesn't matter?
is that you?
...and the science gets done & we make a neat gun for the worms that are...still alive.
Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.