Slashdot Mirror


Twitter Sued By British Soccer Player

norriefc writes "Here in the UK super injunctions are all the rage. These are injunctions that bar the press from even mentioning that the injunctions exist. Recently a Twitter account exposed several of these super injunctions and named several people involved and what their alleged indiscretions were. Now one 'famous' soccer player is trying to sue Twitter and the yet to be named tweeters for invasion of privacy, apparently in ignorance of the Streisand effect. I'm doubtful of an American company paying much attention to UK anti-free-speech laws"

5 of 264 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Streisand effect by Relyx · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just search on Twitter for Imogen Thomas, the girl he had his affair with. His name will likely pop up in the first few tweets.

  2. Re:Sounds like someone 'famous' is out of cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Let's see if this makes the Guinness Book of World Records for "Shortest time a case lasted in court until being thrown out."

    Twitter is a social networking site. If I had people talking trash about me on their Facebook wall, it would make no sense at all to sue Facebook because of what that person said.

    Assuming CTB is Ryan Giggs (which is a popular belief) then's he's certainly not short of cash. (The Evening Standard has his net worth at £22 million - http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/mailFrameset.do?url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/sport/football.html?in_article_id=420790&in_page_id=1779).

    I think the only reason it'll be thrown out is that Twitter is not UK based. If it were, then as it exercises some editorial control (i.e. removes spam and illegal comments on request) it's viewed as a publisher and therefore is treated the same as a newspaper and would fall foul of our (super)injuction laws.

    I run a big football (soccer for the septics) site/forum (thankfully not connected to Ryan Giggs) and there is (we're told on very good authority) a super-injunction placed by one of the club's owners. Not being mainstream media, we've no legitimate way of finding out the details of the injunction, yet we can be prosecuted if one of our forum members publishes the allegations.

    The law in the UK surrounding citizen journalism and internet discussion is an absolute ass. Value your constitutionally protected freedom of speech

  3. Re:Sounds like someone 'famous' is out of cash by Panoptes · · Score: 5, Informative

    As I understand it, the site in question is not being sued - they're being bullied into revealing the identies of the Twits who made the posts.

  4. tag story with ryan_giggs by Winckle · · Score: 5, Informative

    See title, tag the story so no one misses it :D

  5. Re:Can someone clarify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The footballer in question (I'm in the UK and I will take no part in mentioning of names), obtained a UK court injunction stopping his name from being published, under UK privacy laws. There has been no mention of libel, but under UK law you have a right to privacy from the press. Although this is only the case if you are rich and can afford such injunctions.

    A famous welsh footballer who has played professionally for the same top club for 21 years, winning 12 Premier League titles and two UEFA Champions League titles could certainly afford such an injunction.