Slashdot Mirror


Windows 1.0: the Power of DOS, Plus Tiled Windows

jbrodkin writes "I'd always wanted my own working copy of the elusive Windows 1.0, and after a few failed attempts I got one working in a virtual machine (I had to downgrade from the latest version of Windows Virtual PC to an earlier version to get it started, but that's another story). With 416K free memory, we were able to cruise through Reversi, take a look at the first version of Notepad, as well as the now-defunct Microsoft Write, and create a 'masterpiece' in Microsoft Paint. Eventually, applications started crashing, but a simple reboot got it working again. All in all, a nice tour through computing history. Anyone have a copy of the first Macintosh OS they want to send me?"

8 of 249 comments (clear)

  1. working as designed by OglinTatas · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...after a few failed attempts I got one working.... Eventually, applications started crashing, but a simple reboot got it working again.

    Sounds like you have it working as designed. Bravo.

  2. Yep. by wcrowe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Eventually, applications started crashing, but a simple reboot got it working again

    Yep, that's Windows all right.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  3. Heh, if you liked that by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you liked that experience, you should check out the windows really good version

    http://www.deanliou.com/WinRG/

  4. Re:Isn't It Past Time Slashdot Change the MS Icon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The point is that it's now passed beyond satire into meta-satire; the satire is mostly on the fact that so many Slashdot commenters bemoan their portrayal as you do. The very reason it's still being used is probably because of that. Honestly, I see more comments complaining about how Slashdotters are always biased against MS than I see comments which are genuinely biased against them.

  5. Re:Isn't It Past Time Slashdot Change the MS Icon? by scharkalvin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now THAT is a good idea. Actually does anybody beside me think that Ballmer looks like the monster from Young Frankenstein?

  6. Re:Why the hell is this here? by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's nostalgia for those of us that actually used it.

    --

    Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

  7. I don't think you'll find a copy... by kevinmenzel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not sure that I've ever seen a copy of Windows 1.0, and I was REALLY in to old versions of windows at a point. 1.01, yes. 1.02, yes. 1.03, yes. 1.04, definitely (had that running native on a P4 though I forget how easy or difficult that was...) - but not the original 1.0. Apparently there was some sort of major bug with 1.0, or memory leak, or something. If anybody actually finds a copy somewhere though... that would be amazing. I've seen things claiming to be 1.0 that are just resource hacks of 1.01 or 1.04, (usually 1.04) so I know you can "find it on the google" but I have yet to see a confirmed 1.0 disk image anywhere on the net....

  8. Re:QDOS? (DOS 1.0) by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here you go ! It's 86DOS but as wikipedia explains :

    "86-DOS was an operating system developed and marketed by Seattle Computer Products for its Intel 8086-based computer kit. Initially known as QDOS (Quick and Dirty Operating System) the name was changed to 86-DOS once SCP started licensing the operating system."

    --
    If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.