Slashdot Mirror


Daleks To Be Given 'A Rest' From Dr. Who

donberryman writes "Steven Moffat told the BBC 'There's a problem with the Daleks. They are the most famous of the Doctor's adversaries and the most frequent, which means they are the most reliably defeatable enemies in the universe.'" And so, 400+ encounters later, both the Doctor and the daleks will take a break from each other.

39 of 332 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Rights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or does this have to do with not paying rights to the guy who invented them?

    Yeah, Davros has to make a living somehow.

  2. Only this season by Nick+Fel · · Score: 3, Informative

    Moffat has clarified that he was only talking about the current season: https://twitter.com/#!/steven_moffat/status/75506136593338368

  3. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by coolmadsi · · Score: 3, Informative

    At the start of Tom Baker's time the sonic screwdriver couldn't even reliably get the Doctor through a locked door, but now it is a magic wand that can do just about anything. Good to see it got written out of the plot recently.

    It's been destroyed a couple of times since the reboot, and another one has been made, usually popping out the TARDIS console. He used it in the last scene of the last episode that was aired (unless you're talking about future episodes...). It is a fairly simple to use plot device though (need to move plot forward = use screwdriver to open door, otherwise, need to keep characters where they are = door is deadlocked)

  4. Horrible writers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, they should kick these bad writers with names that nobody knows like Neil Gaiman,

  5. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 2

    He did give it to his ganger to disintegrate the animalistic one (though I fail to see why couldn't they just open the door for a second, and have the real Doctor press the button), but by the end of the episode, the TARDIS generated the new one (and presumably destroyed the old one to prevent misuse), which he used to disintegrate Amy's replicant.

    --
    Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
  6. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by martin-boundary · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Camp is cool. What the show really needs though is more people wearing fezzes. If the new Daleks had worn fezzes, they'd never have been shitcanned.

  7. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by rufty_tufty · · Score: 3, Insightful

    i think a lot of this comes down to the quality of the writers not the tools at the disposal of the characters. A bad/mediocre writer will wave the magic wand to get past the problem the writer has put the character in. To create tension they'll have the magic wand not work. This is fine and an audience will put up with this provided the rest of the story is enough to keep them interested.
    A good writer won't need a sonic screwdriver or a deadlock seal, the traps and problems will be those of circumstance, character traits and morals. But like any tool they can be overused too, there's only so many times the lock of the doctor being a pacifist being opened by a companion sacrifice can be used; but we're back to the good vs bad writer stage again...
    So I've no problems with the Daleks being used a lot, used in every episode even as long as they are used well. That does seem to worry me about the new Dr Who that they're not being used because they have a good story but used like the sonic to up the tension and that just doesn't work long term.

    --
    "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
  8. Re:keep daleks, get rid of writers by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

    Sorry I could not disagree more. I have seen almost every episode of all 11 doctors and sat through the great along with some god awefull episodes, but I have never found the show so completely and utterly boring as this current season. This to me is without question the worst it has ever been.

  9. For the Best by WhirlwindMonk · · Score: 2

    Definitely for the best in my opinion, and not just because of writing quality, the new design, or anything like that. They've just lost their "oomph." Early on, they were terrifying, seeing them pop up suddenly made my heart sink, wondering how they would get through the situation. Now that the Doctor has plowed through them countless times, in increasingly absurd numbers, they just don't evoke that reaction anymore. "I am the last Dalek!" *dead* "We are the last of the Dalek fleet!" *dead* "We are the last five Daleks!" *dead* "We are all the Daleks ever!" *dead* "We are the last five Daleks! (again!)" *dead*

    And, at least for me, the same is true of the cybermen. To be fair, I wasn't a huge fan of them as an enemy in the first place, but they definitely feel stale to me now. I'd love to see the return of some of the enemies used only a couple times, or something new and unique. The weeping angels were just fantastic. They were unique, dangerous without being pegged as "THE WORST THING THAT THE DOCTOR HAS EVER FACED!!!!11", and, perhaps most importantly, used sparingly. Maybe one more episode of them this season, perhaps with a nice twist on the theme, amidst some one-shot challenges, and perhaps even a brand new recurring foe.

  10. Re:Rights? by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 2

    I thought the rights were technically paid for, but they were licensed under a "Watchmen" like agreement that meant the rights did not revert back (requiring further payment and/or tweaks to the agreement) until the Daleks weren't used for one season. Whence why the Daleks appeared every season in the new series in at least on episode.

    --
    by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
  11. The Doctor needs a break too by RedBear · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Unfortunately the Daleks aren't the only thing that needs a break. So does the Doctor. He has become a bad charicature of himself.

    This new season is sort of like being forced to watch a Jerry Bruckheimer film every weekend, with all of the ludicrously over-dramatic theme music and gag-me-with-a-spoon melodramatic themes. Already last season the new Doctor was a little too full of himself, but I was quite shocked to find that it got infinitely worse this season. And the ridiculous "mysterious" River Song character that keeps being forced into every episode for some unknown reason just makes me want to vomit. Every time she smugly says her signature line I want someone to punch her in the mouth.

    The plots, and the Doctor himself, are so incoherent that even I barely know what the hell just happened at the end of an episode, and I'm normally the guy in the room who is explaining the plot twists to others. The new episodes make almost zero sense, like they're using some random plot element generator to write the stories for them. The behavior of the characters no longer rings true, so the stories fall flat. The new Doctor comes across as a gibbering moron who doesn't pay attention to anyone or anything besides himself and yet magically finds his way out of every possible situation without seeming to have the slightest clue what he's doing.

    I've managed to find and watch nearly every episode of the old series (thanks Pirate Bay!) and thoroughly enjoyed almost every single episode, from the first Doctor right up through all the David Tennant seasons. But this newest stuff has pretty much made me stop wanting to watch the show, at least until they get new writers. It takes some real talent to screw up a show that has been pretty entertaining for decades already using a very simple formula. They should really just rename the show to "The Something Horribly Bad Happens to the Tardis Every Week Show" which seems to be the common theme now.

    1. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow. It's amazing how two people can watch the same thing and get something completely different from it.

      Since Moffat has taken over, I feel the quality is the best it's ever been. I love the season spanning sub-plots, which are built up with plot hints and subtle clues over months. They're always surprising, yet for me have been logical and obvious when revealed.

      I could go on, but I've made my point. I'm not saying I'm right, 'cos there's no such thing with matters of taste, obviously, but I do find it fascinating how I disagree with every single one of your points about as strongly as I could.

      The human brain. Infinite possibilities :p

    2. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by RedBear · · Score: 2

      Already last season the new Doctor was a little too full of himself, but I was quite shocked to find that it got infinitely worse this season.

      Agreed. It seems like the new way the Doctor gets out of impossible situations always begins with something like "Do you know who I am? I did X, I did Y, I'm the Doctor, you should fear me!", sometimes ending with the bad guys just picking up and scampering away.

      Last season was terrible about this, and it's carried over into this season despite the new Doctor and change of show runner. The cocky Doctor needs to go.

      That is EXACTLY what I'm talking about. He seems to think he's a cross between Superman and Jesus Christ now, like he's both invincible and can do no wrong even while people are getting killed all around him. In the real world (where the Doctor used to live) that kind of crap would have gotten his ass atomized a dozen times over by now.

      I don't want to watch the Superchrist Spacey Soap Opera Show, I want to watch Doctor Who, where a clever guy encounters strange alien mysteries and narrowly avoids getting killed by being clever, not by being stupidly arrogant and self-absorbed and melodramatic.

    3. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by arevos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The plots, and the Doctor himself, are so incoherent that even I barely know what the hell just happened at the end of an episode, and I'm normally the guy in the room who is explaining the plot twists to others.

      I haven't had any problems understanding what happens in each episode. In fact, I find the two new series by Steven Moffat to be considerably better than the old Russel T. Davies series.

      Russel T. Davies was infamous for "Doctor Ex Machina" plots, in which the Doctor would pull technobabble solutions out of his ass at the last minute. His villains were either re-introduced monsters from old Doctor Who episodes, or extremely uninteresting evil aliens who were entirely interchangeable.

      Steven Moffat actually attempts to write science fiction, in that the Doctor's solutions are based on rules set up earlier in the episode, rather than rectum-derived technobabble. The viewer gets all the information the Doctor gets, so when he reveals the solution there's a genuine feeling of "Oh, now that's quite clever". Moffat's monsters also typically have some kind of interesting gimmick and often have some relation to the real world, giving them a certain scare factor that's not present in Davies' generic aliens.

    4. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Comments like yours just illustrate how art is subjective.

      I love Moffat's work. Its incredible. The production is good too. The music you dislike, I feel is wonderful and cinematic. I find the stories incredibly engaging and the stories before Moffat's reign to be a bit of a cookie-cutter yawn-fest and drama that, frankly, just didn't work most of the time.

      That said, I do find the show to be incredibly ridiculous and I'm not sure what 'gritty realism" people like you celebrate. Every episode of this show is incredibly shlocky. Its more "adult fairytales" than anything approaching sci-fi. I think Moffat understands this on a fundamental level and is really delivering the goods.

    5. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Bloodwine77 · · Score: 2

      If you want gritty realism then you watch Torchwood. That has to be one of the most depressing TV shows I have ever watched.

    6. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by MrNemesis · · Score: 2

      Disclaimer: I haven't watched any of the current series yet (despite living in the UK), I prefer to save them up and watch them all in a big lump. I also didn't have any points to mod you up, hence the reply.

      I'm also much more of a fan of Moffat's style, and I'm actually surprised people are comparing his style to that of "Lost"; Moffat has always loved elaborate lead-ups that make little sense until the denouement (if any of you haven't seen the sublime Brit Com "Coupling" I can highly recommend it; lots of realistically filthy humour and meticulously constructed plots in a Fawlty Towers-esque pantomime). I got tired of Lost and its ilk very quickly because they never seemed to progress, at all, either on a plot or sub-plot basis; Moffat is frequently labyrinthine but I've never felt disappointed by any of his it-won't-make-sense-until-the-end scripts. YMMV I guess.

      Being a Who veteran of some years, I also *much* prefer his sense of fear and foreboding to that of RTD's. He's been a Who geek since he was a kid, and despite retaining the campy charm that's always been quintessentially Who he's turned the creeping sense of horror up quite a bit from what I thought was the rather more po-faced stuff in RTD's run, but then he's also a guy who also spent a lot of time behind the sofa as a kid so maybe we're both just creeped out by similar things - the things you can't see/hear being a major theme in a lot of his monsters.

      That said, The Girl in the Fireplace and Blink are still by far the best Who I've seen from Moffat (or, indeed, at all in the new series).

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    7. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Trarman · · Score: 2

      Amy Pond annoys me btw, I'm glad she won't feature much in the next episode, time for Rory to stand up and become a more central character as I like him very much. He has a heart and doesn't seem as self-centred as Amy (he was moved by the TARDIS dying in the previous story). Rory also isn't the racist Amy is.

      Rory really is an untapped goldmine in this series. He's what, a thousand years OLDER than the doctor now? I'm rather surprised that waiting around for Amy to get out of the Pandorica hasn't matured his character any.

    8. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by CrackedButter · · Score: 2

      Yeah, why doesn't those 2000 years of experience kick in for him?

    9. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Bloodwine77 · · Score: 2

      The current Rory is human. His auton duplicate was destroyed during the 2nd big bang.

      I think his character has matured some, but you also have to realize that he spent those 2,000 years being a guardian over the box. It is not likely that he went off traveling the world and having many opportunities to interact and learn.

      He showed his maturity during the Rebel Flesh two-parter. He didn't look down on the flesh humanoids and he seemed to be very in-sync with the Doctor about respecting their lives. I suspect he was very sympathetic to the flesh because he has memories of being an Auton. When he was an Auton he felt like he was still Rory, so he can understand how the flesh have to wrestle with having the memories and personality of a person, but in fact be their duplicates.

    10. Re:The Doctor needs a break too by Tetsujin · · Score: 2

      Already last season the new Doctor was a little too full of himself, but I was quite shocked to find that it got infinitely worse this season.

      Agreed. It seems like the new way the Doctor gets out of impossible situations always begins with something like "Do you know who I am? I did X, I did Y, I'm the Doctor, you should fear me!", sometimes ending with the bad guys just picking up and scampering away.

      I'm not a fan of the Doctor's showboating, either... Eye-roll every time there's mention of "The Oncoming Storm" or anything like that. But do consider the circumstances of the two cases in which it happened in the 2010 series:

      1: vs. the Atraxi. The Atraxi were already content, having re-captured Prisoner Zero, and were leaving, when The Doctor called them back to bitch them out.
      2: vs. the alliance: The Doctor didn't know it but he was the reason all those aliens were there in the first place. So all his showboating really did was confirm for them that their trap was working.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  12. At least the Daleks don't have relationships by Bongo · · Score: 3, Funny

    But honey, how would you feel if I rescued you from an inner city estate?

    EXTERMINATE.

    Well ok, how about if I hoisted you out of a killer taxi in a wedding dress?

    EXTERMINATE.

    Waited 2000 years by your side?

    EXTERMINATE.

    Flowers?

    EXTERMINATE.

    1. Re:At least the Daleks don't have relationships by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 4, Funny

      (I am submitting this for a friend who has trouble with keyboards)

      The BBC is bi-ased. The pro-gram shows only the da-leks being de-fea-ted. It never shows the time-lines when the da-leks con-quer and the doc-tor is de-fea-ted. They por-tray the da-leks as mind-less kill-ers. The daleks are nu-anced. The da-leks are complex. The da-leks have had it up to here with this stu-pid pro-gram. Dear 'Points Of View'. Oh why, oh why, oh why can we not have un-bi-ased re-por-ting? Why can't we see the da-leks win and the doc-tor get his ass ex-ter-mi-nated? Why can't the doc-tor stay dead when he dies? It's all so un-fair. Yours, Dis-gus-ted of Ska-ro.

  13. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This was a big problem with the Russell T Davies episodes. He used spectacle as a substitute for plot. Huge fleets of Daleks or Cybermen as a substitute for character interaction. In contrast, the best episodes have been things like Blink, that have kept the atmosphere with relatively little emphasis on special effects.

    The original problem with the sonic screwdriver was that, after being used a few times, writers either had to use it, or have the audience thinking 'why didn't he use the sonic screwdriver?' With the deadlock seal, good writers can just say add a line of dialog saying 'oh, doesn't work', and move on. Imagine 42, for example, without the deadlock seal. Either there would have to be some contrived way of losing the sonic screwdriver at the start, or the audience would have sat there saying 'why don't you just use the sonic screwdriver on the doors?!?!?' Just mentioning the word 'deadlock' meant that we all knew that the magic wand wouldn't work, so there was tension that didn't seem artificial.

    With a good writer, the sonic screwdriver is a substitute for technobabble. Put on the glasses, wave the magic wand, and something involving technology that the audience doesn't need to care about just happened and you can return to the plot. No need to go into long explanations. We all know the sonic screwdriver does complicated things with technology, and we don't need to know the details.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  14. Re:Daleks don't make sense by itsdapead · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the problem is that R.T. Davis wrote the Daleks to be the ultimate, unstoppable enemy of the Time Lords because they were one of the most well-known elements of the brand and useful for marketing..

    There's a far better plot-driven reason: in the classic "Genesis of the Daleks" Doctor #4 was sent back to wipe the Daleks out before they were created. So, basically, he fired the first shot in the Great Time War.

    This just doesn't fit well with their retro design.

    But the Daleks are also fanatical racial supremacists, so they would never accept that the design cobbled together by Davros in a bunker was anything but perfect.

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  15. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by delinear · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What I think works particularly well with the sonic is the fact that it's used so much, but much of the time appears to do little or nothing. The doctor will quite often point it at people or things and take a "reading" that he doesn't do anything with or about, which is a nice way of saying "this tool is always here but it's not always useful" - they've made mention in the past of how flaky it can be. The doctor uses it almost as an extension of his sense to probe situations in the same way as a human might use smell and sound to augment sight (and still sometimes come up with the wrong answer). Conversely using it less but only using it in situations where it always works to save the day would turn it from a tool into a miracle device. What we need is more of the screwdriver but not always more of it saving the day.

  16. Re:I guess by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This strikes me as a somewhat sensible decision.

    I mean, I like the Daleks and all that, but they seemed to pop up an awful lot in the new Who series (since 2005) to the point where you got the impression that people forgot Who wasn't all about them. They appeared fairly regularly in the "classic" series, but not quite as frequently as peoples' memories would lead them to believe.

    Then again, I realised a while back that my earliest (and *very* faint) memories of Doctor Who at a very young age are of watching it mainly to see the Daleks- not the Doctor!- and being disappointed when they weren't on. And it's easy as an adult to forget that. But I still think that they've made the right decision- just easing off the Daleks a bit for a while. If kids want to see them, the "old" "new" episodes are still repeated countless times on BBC3 anyway!

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  17. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    If it is that trivial to deadlock, why not deadlock EVERY door.

    Cost. Even galaxy conquering space monsters have accountants.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  18. Re:I wish I was a Dalek by Dogtanian · · Score: 2

    After years of not being able to stand Dr Who, I've only just been able to watch this new one. [..] I know the BBC can't spend money; but even the The Dresden Files looked better.

    Er... do you remember what the original series was like? This new one is absolutely massive budget compared to it. That shouldn't be taken to mean that the original series was crap, but even in the best episodes you never got the impression that they had tons of money to throw at it.

    The new one has quite a lot of effects- maybe too much on occasion- and they're really pretty good for the most part.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  19. Re:I guess by asdf7890 · · Score: 4, Informative

    They appeared fairly regularly in the "classic" series, but not quite as frequently as peoples' memories would lead them to believe.

    Indeed, Doctors 5 through 7 only met them once each on-screen. 2 & 4 encountered them in two televised stories each, 3 bumped into them in 3 stories and 1 holds the record (if you count modern two-parters as single stories) at 5 televised meetings. I'm ignoring short "guest" appearances here, like the few minutes in the 5 doctors, and counting the last segment of Frontier in Space as a run-on to the full Dalek story that followed.

    The fact that they didn't appear often heightened the excitement for the fans when they did and I agree with many that they have perhaps been overused in recent series, so giving their narrative a break for a bit certainly makes good sense to me.

  20. Re:I guess by grub · · Score: 4, Insightful


    The Daleks went from being a feared nemesis to being a laughing stock.

    Exactly as what happened to The Borg in the Star Trek universe. It got so bad on Voyager that I wouldn't have been surprised to see The Borg beaten in an episode by cream pies in the face as Captain Janeway spun around on the floor yelping "Woop woop woop!" like Curly.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  21. Re:spolier:The sonic screwdriver seems to be gone by AgentSmith · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cost. Even galaxy conquering space monsters have accountants.

    [Cut scene to a dimly lit counting house in the outer reaches of the of Sol galaxy.
    Pan down to a green blobish looking fellow behind a raised desk and a Dalek gliding into the room]

    Dalek: HERE IS MY REQUISITION FORM FOR DEADLOCK DOORS!

    Vogon Accountant: Get stuffed! We can't afford it. The Galactic Economy is complete in stook thanks to you lot failing all the time!

    Dalek: THE LOCKS ARE EFFICIENT! THE LOCKS WILL KEEP OUT THE DOCTOR ! WE WILL NOT FAIL!!!!

    Vogon Accountant: I can't get money from nowhere! Can't you conquer something?! How about the Cybermen? They keep hording gold away like their lives depend on it.

    Dalek: CYBERMEN ARE NOT THE PROBLEM! THE DOCTOR IS THE PROBLEM! WE WILL EXTERMINATE HIM WHEN THE DALEK RACE IS SECURE!!! EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE!! EX-TER-MIN-NATE!!!!!!

    Vogon Accountant: Oh Hells Bells! [Accountant pushes a button on his console] Imelda, another Dalek 'client' has turned foaming mouth mental again. Bring out some of my . . . poetry. [Imelda hands him a large leatherbound tome which he unlocks] Yes, now then! Fie gorlble sond on one summer day. Tise doc! Doc doc! Tise doc!

    Dalek: Naggggg! MY SENSORS ARE IMPARED!! Narrrghhh!! MY PLUNGY THING CANNOT REACH MY BRAIN!!! AAAAAAGGHHHHH!!!

    [Dalek explodes. Two Vogon janitors in coveralls come by and wheel the remaining Dalek stump away.]

    Vogon Accountant: Shoulda used a Sonic Screwdriver. Stupid blobby git.

         

  22. Leave the field fallow by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 2

    The Daleks are England's Godzilla - their take on the echo of the trauma of WW2: a mechanized tank with unrepentant genocidal goals. When they were on screen I could see they touched some lingering discomfort in my parents' generation - even though I didn't entirely know why. They way they were reintroduced in the revival, there was a touch of the that same legacy fear in the way they had the Doctor recoil from them - that background trauma was internalized into the canon of the show.

    Now that the show has moved past the Time War survivor guilt issues, the Daleks do need to go away for a while until a suitable story can be found that needs them.

  23. Re:I guess by mackil · · Score: 2

    I agree completely. It's a bit like the Borg from Star Trek TNG. They weren't on the show often, but when they were, it was usually an "event". The Daleks are no longer an "event".

  24. Thoughts on Season 6 [Spoilers] by Bloodwine77 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the Daleks will be back, but probably not before season 7. I suspect the rest of this season will involve Amy, her baby, and what ever alien race is involved.

    Part of me thinks the Amy-having-a-timelord-baby story arc is borderline jumping the shark. I hate it when shows use babies as plot devices. It just feels too much like a cheesy soap opera gimmick. The other part of me is going to give it a chance because I can sort of see an overall theme emerging. Either her baby is a genetic experiment or it is hers and Rory's but since it could have been conceived on the TARDIS then due to all the time energy it could be part time lord.

    We've seen TARDIS-like consoles in two episodes. The first was in the Lodger, in the "upstairs apartment" where people were being zapped while being forced to try to power the ship. The second time was in The Day of the Moon, in the sewers with the Silence. I do not think the Silence are responsible for the TARDIS-like ships, and we will see a new, different enemy that is trying to build a TARDIS and has kidnapped or engineered Amy's baby so it can power the ship. This is just my speculation.

    I can see this story arc spanning many more episodes, so there isn't really any room for Daleks. I do think we can use a proper break from Daleks and Cybermen, so that it'll actually mean something again when they are re-introduced.

    As for the 11th doctor, I like him more than I thought I would when I heard David Tennant was leaving the show. Matt Smith plays a very quirky doctor and the 11th doctor feels more vulnerable, quirky, and child-like. He makes mistakes and his technology is more fallible (e.g.: the sonic screwdriver doesn't work in every situation). As much as I love the 10th doctor, the writers made him too powerful and god-like and near the end I never really felt he was in much danger (with few exceptions). Moffat either had to tone down Doctor Who's invincible awesomeness, or he had to introduce ever-more-powerful enemies. There is more wiggle room if he weakened the doctor, so I think that was a good decision. My only real complaint about Matt Smith as the doctor is that he needs to be more intense at times. I love his quirkiness, but if he can add in some intensity to the mix then he has potential to be one of the best doctors.

    I also like Rory, because he is a stand up guy that does the right thing. He is the best of humanity. I think he is a better person than Amy. He is a bit insecure, but wouldn't we all if we were standing next to the Doctor? I am happy the writers ended up making Amy and Rory be together and love each other without making her another wide-eyed lovesick Doctor groupie. I hate love triangles and I am glad that plot device is not being used ... for now.

  25. Re:How to get rid of Amy+Rory? by Bloodwine77 · · Score: 2

    Amy is some nice eye candy, but between the two characters I think it would be a good twist if Rory ended up being the only companion in the end. He is the better human, afterall.

  26. Dalek vacation by d.the.duck · · Score: 3, Funny

    Somewhere the Daleks will be a spa.... EXFOLIATE EXFOLIATE

    --
    Where does the signature go?
  27. Re:I guess by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 2

    Exactly as what happened to The Borg in the Star Trek universe.

    At least Trek countered in DS9 with the Dominion. An enemy who, while ultimately defeated, managed to install fear for several seasons.

  28. Re:keep daleks, get rid of writers by szyzyg · · Score: 2

    Sorry, Current generation of Who is consistently better than anything else from the modern of classic era, I've watched ever episode that exists and listened to all the Big Finish audio production and the Moffat era Who really is magnificent.

    It says a lot that the best episodes in recent years have all been Moffat penned:
    The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances
    The Girl In The Fireplace
    Blink
    Silence In the Library/Forest of The Dead
    and of course.... he's now the producer, he's yet to top 'Blink' - but it's consistenly better on so many levels that I find myself feeling sorry for both Tennant and Ecclestone who were fine actors but kept on being given poor scripts to work with.

    There are many many classic era episodes that rank up there with the current generation - 'The Talons of Weng Chiang' and 'Genesis of the Daleks' being two particularly fine examples. But there's sooooo much mediocre dross like timelash that brings the classic show down.