Slashdot Mirror


Two Elements Added To Periodic Table

smitty777 writes "Two new elements have been added to the periodic table of the elements. Elements 114 and 116 are the weightiest known, with atomic weights of 289 and 292 respectively. The discoverers are proposing flerovium and moscovium as names for these two new discoveries. There are also arguments being made to add in three more as well: 113, 115 and 118." We've noted element 114 in the past, but this is more official.

138 comments

  1. Well crap by TheyTookOurJobs · · Score: 0

    My Chucknorium TShirt is going to be out of date now...

    1. Re:Well crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No where near as much as these damn Norris jokes.

  2. And the elements... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Are the weightiest.
    The chemists...
    ...Are the craziest.

    Waaaay, back home.

  3. Weightiest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    WTF is this?
    whats wrong with heaviest

    1. Re:Weightiest by axl917 · · Score: 1

      WTF is this?
      whats wrong with heaviest

      How do you spell potato, Mr. Quayle?

    2. Re:Weightiest by Haedrian · · Score: 2

      Stupid word. Especially since we're probably talking about mass anyway.

    3. Re:Weightiest by Haedrian · · Score: 1

      Lets call the whole thing off!

    4. Re:Weightiest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Knowledge embiggens even the smallest man

    5. Re:Weightiest by Lord+Jester · · Score: 4, Informative

      Weightiest is a real word and the use is valid.

      http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/weightiest (2b)

    6. Re:Weightiest by kimvette · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree, and what's more, the use of the term "weightiest" would be perfectly cromulent had we been discussing weight. However massiest would probably have been even cromulenter.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    7. Re:Weightiest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hint: Atomic weight

    8. Re:Weightiest by aix+tom · · Score: 2

      The "heavy" is probably all worn out from the old "what's heavier, a ton of flerovium or a ton of moscovium?" joke and needed a day off.

    9. Re:Weightiest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a misnomer.

    10. Re:Weightiest by chill · · Score: 1

      It is more fun if you throw gold in the mixture. What is heavier, a ton of gold or a ton of ?

      Gold is measured in Troy ounces, where 1 Troy Oz = 1.097 avoirdupois ounce. Thus, the gold is heavier.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    11. Re:Weightiest by fractalspace · · Score: 1

      Because we all know, the Heaviest element is "Jumbonium" (http://theinfosphere.org/Jumbonium)

    12. Re:Weightiest by Defenestrar · · Score: 1

      Nah - it's back to Doc Brown being concerned over the future 80s because of how often Marty McFly talked about something being "heavy."

    13. Re:Weightiest by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Funny

      That only works if you (for some reason) insist on using the currency-based measure for gold, but not on all the other items.

      That's retarded. One of the first things you do is ensure your units are consistent.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    14. Re:Weightiest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bzzzt! There are 12 Troy ounces per Troy pound and 16 Avoirdupois ounces per Avoirdupois pound so a ton of anything measured in Avoirdupois is heavier than a ton of gold measure in Troy units.

    15. Re:Weightiest by fractalspace · · Score: 1

      Hint: Dictionary

    16. Re:Weightiest by EdIII · · Score: 2

      Hint: These arguments might be why we don't get laid that much.

    17. Re:Weightiest by smelch · · Score: 1

      Hint: No, its all aspects of our personalities.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    18. Re:Weightiest by smelch · · Score: 1

      Shit! This conversation is damned compelling. I came in here expecting to be bored about properties of new elements, I was not - I repeat not - ready to witness this epic battle of which-unit-is-the-weightiest.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    19. Re:Weightiest by Weaselgrease · · Score: 1

      And our average weightiness.

    20. Re:Weightiest by Surt · · Score: 1

      But .... as pictured Jumbonium is actually light enough to float. It's clearly the largest (visible to the naked eye), but that doesn't make it the heaviest. </nerd>

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    21. Re:Weightiest by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      "That's retarded. One of the first things you do is ensure your units are consistent."

      Yeah, that worked out real well for that Mars probe.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    22. Re:Weightiest by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Wow. I thought the reply from weaselgrease was funny already, but your signature is hilarious.

      I can't understand it.

      It's like you want a wizardly (sorcerers don't need words) way to influence somebodies butthole.

      I have this image of you in a basement with a cat performing "controlled studies" like a Wizard would do in some School of Magic.

      Except, I don't think the butthole spell will be as popular as you think.

      In any case, you are correct. It *IS* all aspects of our personalities. The fact you want to touch buttholes with your "mind" and that I find it so funny and curious that I just replied to it. We should go to a bar together and see who gets laid first arguing about something. I expect multiple visits. Perhaps Tequila will help.

    23. Re:Weightiest by smelch · · Score: 1

      We should go to a bar together and see who gets laid first arguing about something.

      Why do I get the feeling you are going to force a tie?

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    24. Re:Weightiest by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      Meh. Most dictionaries are written by a useless class of people called descriptivists who slavishly record every (mis)use of a word. If you used Humperdink like this: "The morning was Humperdink", they'd create an entry for it, no matter how wrong or stupid it is. Going to a dictionary for proof of a word's meaning or validity is like citing Wikipedia as a source.

      This is why the ignorant and lazy misuse words like decimate and literally. Stupid person uses it incorrectly... stupid listener repeats it... stupid dictionary writer codifies it... stupid person misuses word... smart person says "no, that's not what that word means"... stupid person says "but but but but the dictionary...".

      Weightiest could be valid, i'm not arguing against that. Just be careful about citing dictionaries.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    25. Re:Weightiest by Lord+Jester · · Score: 1

      Point taken. However, it is not as if I am pointing to the dictionary to show the validity of D'oh or ain't.

      But, most words, even got their start somewhere.

      That said. Weightiest, as well as weightier, are both valid forms of weighty.

  4. Element 115 by jd · · Score: 3, Informative

    Should be called Lazarium. After all, it's safe to say nobody has an earlier claim of discovery. :) (Hey, I said nothing about any actual discovery, just a claim of one.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Element 115 by calmofthestorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No it should be called elerium.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    2. Re:Element 115 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No it should be called Clippy.

    3. Re:Element 115 by fotoflojoe · · Score: 3, Funny

      Upsidaisyum

    4. Re:Element 115 by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Only if it's a bronze colored crystal!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:Element 115 by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      As long as they don't call it Unobtainium.

    6. Re:Element 115 by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Yomommanum

      XD

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    7. Re:Element 115 by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Well, I hope they get it added soon... I need to make a backstep.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    8. Re:Element 115 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      brb reinstalling X-com

    9. Re:Element 115 by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      No, it IS called elerium. ;-)

  5. How about by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 3, Funny

    Farnsworthium?
    "Good news, everyone!"

    1. Re:How about by ebh · · Score: 1

      peeteebarnum

    2. Re:How about by Halifax+Samuels · · Score: 1

      Wonderflonium and Unobtanium.

    3. Re:How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Dolomite should be somewhere on the table.

    4. Re:How about by treeves · · Score: 1

      You'll have to settle for Ca, S and O being on there. There is no periodic table of the compounds.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  6. I'll be most disappointed if.... by Brannoncyll · · Score: 3, Interesting

    element 115 is not given the name Elerium, in honour of the fictional element used to power the spacecraft in the XCOM series. Ununpentium is dull and doesn't really roll off the tongue!

    1. Re:I'll be most disappointed if.... by Haedrian · · Score: 2

      But technically isn't "Elerium-115" mean "Elerium with atomic mass of 115" ? Like "U-235" ?

    2. Re:I'll be most disappointed if.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U-235 was a nuclear submarine invented by the Nazis.

    3. Re:I'll be most disappointed if.... by Haedrian · · Score: 1

      They didn't have nuclear submarines in those days.

      And there's no U 235. There's a U 238 which is both an isotope of Uranium and a U-boot.

    4. Re:I'll be most disappointed if.... by Brannoncyll · · Score: 2

      That would be the usual convention, yes. However the online UFOpaedia wiki site (and my vague recollections) suggest that it was also referred to as element 115 in the game. That being said, the wikipedia discussion on ununpentium argues that Elerium-115 should be interpreted as the Elerium isotope of mass 115 rather than element 115, prompting this pop-culture reference's removal from the article.

    5. Re:I'll be most disappointed if.... by Brannoncyll · · Score: 2

      Don't know where you got that information from. According to the font of all knowledge, U 235 makes up 0.72% of natural uranium and is fissile, whereas U 238 is not.

    6. Re:I'll be most disappointed if.... by Haedrian · · Score: 1

      I meant "There was no U-boot 235" not there's no U-235 isotope.

    7. Re:I'll be most disappointed if.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was SECRET!

    8. Re:I'll be most disappointed if.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U-boot

      Canadian?

    9. Re:I'll be most disappointed if.... by Arancaytar · · Score: 2

      ... German.

    10. Re:I'll be most disappointed if.... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      I meant "There was no U-boot 235"

      Except that there was. The U-235 was a Type VIIC, commissioned 19 Dec 1942. She never saw combat service and was used as a training boat. Sunk by a US bombing raid on 14 May, 1943, she was successfully raised and put back into service. She was finally sunk for good when a German torpedo boat attacked her by mistake on 14 April, 1945. She went down with all 47 hands.

    11. Re:I'll be most disappointed if.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      element 115 is not given the name Elerium, in honour of the fictional element used to power the spacecraft in the XCOM series. Ununpentium is dull and doesn't really roll off the tongue!

      Are you fucking retarded?

    12. Re:I'll be most disappointed if.... by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      What about Starktonium? One has to be this, right?

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    13. Re:I'll be most disappointed if.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if it weren't for bad luck, that boat wouldn't have had any luck at all?

    14. Re:I'll be most disappointed if.... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Only in that she was sunk by her own side. In the end, just about all the U-boats were sunk in action, and most went down with all hands. Over the entire course of the war, the U-boat service suffered a 75-80% casualty rate (and I can think of few nastier deaths than being trapped in a sinking submarine)--and yet, they were a all-volunteer outfit and never had a shortage of recruits.

    15. Re:I'll be most disappointed if.... by danlock4 · · Score: 1

      She went down with all 47 hands.

      WOW, a real live woman with forty-seven hands! I wonder if each hand had five fingers? That would be 235 fingers, each with a nail that might need to be clipped periodically.

      Or.... maybe it was 24 people, one of them with only one hand. Captain Hook, of course.... always unlucky, arrrr....

      and element 115 could just be named Hook-115, or maybe just Fred. That'd be easy for certain peoples.

      --
      To .sig or not to .sig, that is the question.
  7. and what about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unobtanium?

    1. Re:and what about by Defenestrar · · Score: 1

      Mostly, but more like Notobtaniumforverylongium. It had been predicted that Uuq (element 115) might be one "peak" on the islands of stability, but it seems that the actuality is a few elements lower. None of these talked about today should have much of a useful halflife.

  8. What happened to that un uh um oo ee oo ah ah standardized naming system?

    Did they finally realize it sucked the passion and romance right out of the periodic table?

    1. Re:Huh by vlm · · Score: 2

      passion and romance ... periodic table

      That sounds like the plot of a xkcd comic...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Huh by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Those are used until a name is decided on.

    3. Re:Huh by AikonMGB · · Score: 1

      I believe that naming system was used to fill in spots that either haven't been discovered/created, or that have been discovered but not verified/accepted. Once the corresponding element gets "voted onto the island", they give it an official name.

      Aikon-

    4. Re:Huh by RoverDaddy · · Score: 5, Funny

      What happened to that un uh um oo ee oo ah ah standardized naming system?

      They gave up when they realized it would have to be extended to include ting tang walla walla bing bang.

      --
      RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
    5. Re:Huh by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      WP sez:

      "A systematic element name is the temporary name and symbol assigned to newly synthesized and not yet synthesized chemical elements. In chemistry, a transuranic element receives a permanent name and symbol only after its synthesis has been confirmed."

  9. How close are we to the island of stability? by JoshuaZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real issue isn't these elements which are unstable and not that interesting. The real question is whether the island of stability exists and how close we are to it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability If current theories are correct then there may be a section of elements with atomic numbers near 120 that are much more stable. They might even be stable enough to be used for practical purposes if we can synthesize them on a large scale. Depending on the exact model, they might have half-lives as short as a few seconds (which for elements in this range is comparatively large but not large enough to use for any practical purposes) or it might be as much as 100,000 years (there are more optimistic estimates but they seem extremely unlikely). For comparison, tritium has a half-life of about 12 years and is used in a lot of practical applications. So, if the island exists and we find good ways to synthesize these elements, then we might get some very interesting chemistry.

    1. Re:How close are we to the island of stability? by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

      and even more importantly, how does this magic element relate to mining operations on pandora, and is it the stuff that makes 10 foot tall blue chicks hot?

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    2. Re:How close are we to the island of stability? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting on a high numbered inexpensively-manufactured element that has a short half life and quickly decays into non-radioactive gold and silver, chemically, atomically indistinguishable from the stuff we mine :-)

    3. Re:How close are we to the island of stability? by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Or find out the hard way why our neighboring stars aren't teeming with advanced civilizations.
      "Congrats! We just created element 120 and it appears stable! Yay! What do you mean the sensors aren't working anymore? Ok who's messing with the clock and making the hands run backwards? How'd my underwear get on my head and why did Fred just turn into a polar bear?"

    4. Re:How close are we to the island of stability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chemistry could be interesting but I doubt it would ever be more than a laboratory curiosity. Even if we discovered a super heavy element with a long half life and low energy decay mode of alpha emission you still have the radiological emissions and chemistry of what could be a very long and fast decay chain. Once the element decays it becomes a different element that is unlikely to remain in the hypothesized island of stability and could violently unstable, emitting neutrons, beta particles and gamma photons all along its decay chain. By contrast Tritium decays by beta emission into Helium 3 which is stable and the end of the decay chain. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decay_chain for some details.

    5. Re:How close are we to the island of stability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah thats passe let me know when they get to element 120 in the anti-perodic table

    6. Re:How close are we to the island of stability? by Squiffy · · Score: 1

      We're missing the island of stability and we don't know how to hit it yet. As the article you link states, "The manufacturing of nuclei in the island of stability proves to be very difficult, because the nuclei available as starting materials do not deliver the necessary sum of neutrons."

    7. Re:How close are we to the island of stability? by tokul · · Score: 2

      if the island exists and we find good ways to synthesize these elements, then we might get some very interesting chemistry.

      I am not atom physicist, but if island of stability exists, then we should be able to find those elements without nuclear synthesis. Those elements would exist as they would be created the usual way by mother universe.

      If you have unstable composite with over 250 parts, do you really expect that composite of 300-400 parts will be rock solid.

    8. Re:How close are we to the island of stability? by treeves · · Score: 1

      Don't hold your breath, as they say.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    9. Re:How close are we to the island of stability? by profplump · · Score: 1

      Larger elements almost certainly existed in the past, but there's nothing bigger than Bi that's stable on astronomical time scales (and even Bi has recently been discovered to be slightly radioactive, albeit with a very long half-life), so any heavy elements that were created in normal astronomical events have long-since decayed into lighter elements -- when you get to 200+ nucleons "stable" is a relative term.

    10. Re:How close are we to the island of stability? by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Stability is relative. If we could create a very heavy element with a half-life of 10 years then that would be fascinating (and perhaps very useful)- but you won't find much of it floating around in space; all elements created "naturally" are created in the fusion reactions of stars, generally dispersed by supernova; anything created in most known supernovae would be gone long before it reaches us. And that's even assuming the fusion reactions in stars would be capable of producing such a very heavy element.

      (IANAAstrophysicist, please do reply to this if you are and want to correct me).

  10. Elerium 115 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh, Elerium 115 is comiiiing! Now we need to get some Alien Alloys...

    1. Re:Elerium 115 by x6060 · · Score: 2

      I loved X-COM as a kid! All I want is a heavy plasma rifle.... But seriously, I think youre the only other person on earth I have run into that knows about this game.

    2. Re:Elerium 115 by xkuehn · · Score: 2

      I think youre the only other person on earth I have run into that knows about this game.

      Really? My friends and I used to love it.

      If you don't know about it, you might want to check out UFO:AI (ufoai.ninex.info, or find it on sourceforge). It's very playable but gets boring late in the game. That should improve as the game matures.

    3. Re:Elerium 115 by nschubach · · Score: 1

      You need more friends ;) ... I thought everyone played (or at least knew) about X-COM.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    4. Re:Elerium 115 by Brannoncyll · · Score: 1

      In the UK it was called UFO: Enemy Unknown, and I must have racked up 200 hours on that game. Also, I think you would be surprised about how popular the game is; certainly there are at least three full discussions on this Slashdot article discussing elerium-115 (including one started by yours truly), and as one of the other commenters have pointed out, there are several active open source projects aiming to recreate it's splendour (this article has a list of the major projects).

  11. Obviously by nschubach · · Score: 2

    “Element 114 obviously isn’t a very catchy name, especially in a sea of molybdenums and seaborgiums. They have temporary titles — ununquadium and ununhexium — but final names are yet to been decided.

    Obviously, the elements must roll off the tongue as well as molybdenum.

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    1. Re:Obviously by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Obviously, the elements must roll off the tongue as well as molybdenum.

      The disulfide is pretty slippery but I wouldn't put it on my tongue.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Obviously by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      I knew a guy who had difficulty pronouncing a number of words correctly. Molybdenum was one of them. He invariably pronounced it 'mollybendum'. Funny, but a bit sad at the same time.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    3. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since we're talking weightiest: how about miketysonium? Hulkhoganium? Bethdittonium? Kirstiealleynium?

    4. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, there once was a U.S. President who couldn't even pronounce "nuclear."

      For two terms.

      Funny now, not so much when he was in office.

    5. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew a guy who had difficulty pronouncing a number of words correctly. Molybdenum was one of them. He invariably pronounced it 'mollybendum'. Funny, but a bit sad at the same time.

      I knew of a guy who had difficulty pronouncing a number of words correctly. Nuclear was one of them. He also had a problem knowing his left hand from his right and how to properly end a "Fool me once..." saying. Funny, but a bit sad at the same time.

      - Peder

  12. better names by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Informative

    almost obligatory whenever these kinds of stories pop up on slashdot:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fictional_elements,_materials,_isotopes_and_atomic_particles

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:better names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The list omitted Administratium

      http://rs2.ch.liv.ac.uk/~dlc/Administratium.html

    2. Re:better names by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      hey, it's wikipedia: add it ;-)

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    3. Re:better names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.. they need to name one of them Naquadah.

    4. Re:better names by FrootLoops · · Score: 1

      That is one of the most hilarious Wikipedia pages I've ever seen. Another that comes to mind is the list of films considered the worst. Lists seem to be a good holdout for ridiculous content.

    5. Re:better names by jo_ham · · Score: 2

      hahahahahaha.

      Oh wait, you were serious, let me laugh even harder!

      The layman can't edit wikipedia any more without their changes being immediately reverted as "vandalism" or some other spurious reason by the wiki mods.

    6. Re:better names by treeves · · Score: 1

      Did the ;-) tell you he was serious?

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    7. Re:better names by treeves · · Score: 1

      It also left out the magic water that's left after you dilute all of the _[insert symptom-producing substance here]__ out of it, as in homeopathy.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    8. Re:better names by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      No, but I was quoting Bender; I meant to add a thing about Hermes and the bureaucracy department and wikipedia etc, but I got called away and posted what I had :D

    9. Re:better names by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      I have made edits to Wikipedia without them being reverted. I think it would depend on what you are editing.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    10. Re:better names by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      I don't usually like to be the huge cynic, seeing conspiracy and evil everywhere, but my experience with editing wikipedia has been universally bad. All of my edits have been reverted, so in the end I just stopped trying. It wasn't even controversial topics - generally just spelling or grammar corrections and supplemental information on science and engineering topics (including cites).

      Given that my spelling corrections were being quickly reverted when they were obvious to anyone who could read English, I can only assume that either the edits were being done out of malice (hard to believe since I hadn't done anything even remotely controversial), or simply being reverted without even being looked at, presumably because I'd been identified as one of the boogeyman "sock puppet" accounts of wikipedia's "hated enemies, who are everywhere!" like some for of McCarthy-esque demons hiding in your neighbour's house.

      I don't let it get in the way of using wiki - I still look things up on there as a first point of suggestion on a topic I'm unfamiliar with, but I have long since stopped trying to contribute - there's only so many times you can offer your help, only to have it made abundantly clear that they don't want it. This also affected my decision not to donate any money during the big fundraising drive, and I have given money to open projects that I have found useful - wiki would be the natural choice, but sorry Jimmy! No dinero. Perhaps you can just have a whip round among the overly-cliquey mods.

  13. The Evil League of Elements by AnotherAnonymousUser · · Score: 1

    Flerovium? I vote a rename in favor of Wonderflonium.

  14. Moscovium, placenames by aBaldrich · · Score: 2

    This moscovium made me think of other elements named for places. Europium and Americium for continents. Lutetium for Paris, Californium for California. Dubnium for Dubna, a city in Russia. Francium and Gallium for France, Germanium for Germany, Polonium for Poland), Hafnium for Copenhagen, Holmium for Stockholm (these last 2 from their Latin names). Then Hassium for Hesse (Germany), Rhenium for Eastern France (jk :D), Ruthenium for the old region in Ukraine-Russia, Strontium for a village in Scotland, Berkelium for Berkeley, and Thulium for a mythical island in the north Pole.

    A special mention to the lucky sweddish village of Ytterby that has four elements named in its honor: Yttrium, Ytterbium, Erbium, and Terbium.

    --
    In soviet russia the government regulates the companies.
    1. Re:Moscovium, placenames by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you forgot Darmstadtium.

      GSI FTW!

    2. Re:Moscovium, placenames by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Brazilium ? São-Paulium ? Rio-de-Janeirium ? Recifium ? Ronaldinium ?

    3. Re:Moscovium, placenames by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the ones with names based on mythologies, such as Argon (Argo) and Hel(l)ium?

    4. Re:Moscovium, placenames by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Rio-de-Janeirium

      I wish that were a real thing so much it almost makes me want to fund a high-energy particle physics lab there just so there would be an excuse.

    5. Re:Moscovium, placenames by building+materials · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know if element 115 is real?

    6. Re:Moscovium, placenames by aBaldrich · · Score: 1

      Helium is not from the gremanic Hel, but from the greek Helios, the Sun. There are a couple more.

      --
      In soviet russia the government regulates the companies.
    7. Re:Moscovium, placenames by gr8dude · · Score: 1

      Very interesting comment, thank you for compiling all the info in one place for us.

  15. "Yomamamium" for weightiest element by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I vote "Yomamamium" to be the name of the weightiest element.

  16. Outdated periodic tables will ruin school district by formfeed · · Score: 1

    I hope they had at least the courtesy to add the new elements at the bottom, so old tables can be updated more easily.

  17. The perfect name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    George. I will call it George

  18. Dammit and I just ordered the shower curtain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I'll have to wait for ver 1.1 of http://www.thinkgeek.com/homeoffice/gear/8a2f/

    1. Re:Dammit and I just ordered the shower curtain by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Now I'll have to wait for ver 1.1 of http://www.thinkgeek.com/homeoffice/gear/8a2f/ [thinkgeek.com]

      If element discoveries keep going at the current rate, in 20 or 30 years, a shower curtain won't be large enough for all the elements to fit, and still have readable type <G>

      Perhaps a linoleum floor version of the table?

  19. Unobtainium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously

  20. Re:Outdated periodic tables will ruin school distr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they had at least the courtesy to add the new elements at the bottom, so old tables can be updated more easily.

    This reminds me of when I was in junior high science class -- we were taught that electrons ORBITED the nucleus. I didn't find out differently until my college astronomy class.

  21. Those aren't elements... by bodland · · Score: 1

    They are the names of the horses Paul Revere used in his famous "Threaten the British" tour...

  22. In Soviet Russia by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    elements name YOU!

  23. Elerium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It should have been called Elerium.

  24. Re ununpentium!? by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    ununpentium
    Does Intel have nothing not to do with this one? (double negative there).

  25. I think we have too little swearwords in science by McNihil · · Score: 1

    how about fatassium and heavyasshitium. No, I am not serious but hey it's Monday.

  26. Re:Re ununpentium!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read this as Rumpelstiltskin

  27. Flavorflavium by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 2

    was how I read that very quickly.... I'm sure he could come up with a rhyme for it too

    1. Re:Flavorflavium by eriqk · · Score: 1

      When he's lampium, he's lampium, he's cold cold lampium.

  28. Baloneyium by tralfaz2001 · · Score: 1

    According to my Oscar Meyer periodic table of elements, element 120 is called Baloneyium. -- The Simpsons

  29. Lighter by owlstead · · Score: 1

    Wake me up when they find a new element with a *lower* atomic number than the ones we are accustomed to now. Maybe one with zero protons called Hallucinatium (Ha!).

    1. Re:Lighter by XManticore · · Score: 1

      Neutronium is already known to exist, it's what you find in a neutron star. Pretty awesome stuff.

    2. Re:Lighter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wake me up when they find a new element with a *lower* atomic number than the ones we are accustomed to now. Maybe one with zero protons called Hallucinatium (Ha!).

      Well anti-hydrogen would be an element with -1 protons?

  30. Re:Outdated periodic tables will ruin school distr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The periodic table is organized in order of atomic number (amongst other things), so I'm sure that wouldn't be a problem.

  31. FlavorFlavium by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    'Nuff said.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  32. Illudium Phosdex by ezzthetic · · Score: 1

    FTW

    --
    You know what they say about opinions. They're all fabulous!
  33. Daltonium by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    It's really about time an element was named Daltonium. It was John Dalton who came up with the original ideas that led to correct theories about the structure of the atom and what an element was, yet his name is not honoured, and is passed over again and again for silly names. It's almost as if people have forgotten him....

    1. Re:Daltonium by smithmc · · Score: 1

      It's really about time an element was named Daltonium. It was John Dalton who came up with the original ideas that led to correct theories about the structure of the atom and what an element was, yet his name is not honoured, and is passed over again and again for silly names. It's almost as if people have forgotten him....

      Well, the unit of atomic mass is named after him...

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  34. 115 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Elements#Element_115:_.28Euphonium.29

  35. Re:Outdated periodic tables will ruin school distr by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    they do 'orbit", but those quantum mechanical "orbitals" are not like any kind of planetary trajectories. Deeply funky shit, no?