Slashdot Mirror


Could the US Phase Out Nuclear Power?

mdsolar writes "In the wake of the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan, [German Chancellor] Merkel announced that her country would close all of its 17 existing reactors by 2022. Other nations, including Japan, Italy, and Switzerland, have announced plans to pare back nuclear power, but none have gone as far as Germany, the world's fourth-largest economy. Merkel vows to replace nuclear power with alternatives that do not increase greenhouse gases or shackle the economic growth. Could the US do the same? An increasing number of reports suggest it is not beyond the realm of possibility, and Germany could provide a road map."

7 of 657 comments (clear)

  1. Re:FUD article by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, I just needed to see "mdsolar writes" to know this submission is just pure FUD.

  2. Of course we could... by loshwomp · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...and the coal industry would be thrilled.

  3. Why? Nuclear is the *safest* form of power.. by Richard_J_N · · Score: 5, Informative
  4. Re:Longer Answer: by nharmon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Spain does not export energy to France. It imports energy from France, and exports energy to Portugal, Morocco, and Andorra.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/dec/28/spain-renewables-energy-electricity-france

  5. Bogus. by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 4, Informative

    Power reactors do not produce plutonium for bombs. A power reactor fuel cycle produces plutonium that contains a substantial percentage of the isotopes Pu240 and Pu242. These are fine for reactor fuel, but they have a high spontaneous fission rate, which makes them very bad for bombs. (Hint: Neither India nor Pakistan used plutonium from their power reactors to make their bombs -- they both went to the great trouble and expense of building special-purpose breeder reactors. Ask yourself why.)

  6. MDSOLAR, REVEAL YOURSELF. by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is yet another FUD article on nuclear power submitted by mdsolar. I personally have nothing against publicizing the dangers of nuclear power, but this should be done in a fair way. User mdsolar has repeatedly posted FUD articles on nuclear power and frequently gets them through because of the mass volume of his submissions and the lack of attention paid by the moderators to specific users' agendas.

    mdsolar, reveal yourself. What is your viable plan for generating electricity once you have wiped all the reactors off the map? How do you plan on dealing with the decommissioning and waste? Could you try easing up and submitting articles not chock-full of such alarmist banter? Are you a BP employee?

  7. Re:Longer Answer: by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 4, Informative

    It most definitely was that.
    There were State elections in Baden Wuertemburg several weeks ago, the CDU have *always* ruled there - often with over 50% of the votes.

    The Ecology Party (Gruenen) won the election and are going into coalition with the SPD. The FDP (the CDU's partners at State and national level) did not get any seats at all. Merkel panicked.

    There were some major reasons why the CDU lost their majority - mostly CDU initiatives which had gone expensively south, although Fukushima will also have been a factor. The CDU decided they had lost touch with their electorate (true) and it was all down to Fukushima (debatable).

    There are several State elections this year. One has been held since that nuclear decision. The CDU came in third, their worst result anywhere since the war. The FDP did not pick up any seats there either.

    --
    Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.