Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Moon Probe Ventures Into Deep Space

hackingbear writes "After completing its 6-month moon survey mission, China's second moon orbiter, Chang'e-2, was found to be in excellent condition and has abundant fuel left, and so it set off from its moon orbit into deep space, heading toward Lagrangian point L2 about 1.5 million kilometers away from the earth, or about 4 times farther out than the moon. The orbiter left its moon orbit at 5:10 p.m., according to the State Administration of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defence. The probe is expected to perform exploration at L2. It is the first Chinese spacecraft to venture beyond the moon and establish the country's capability in deep space exploration."

167 comments

  1. It's Running Away by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2

    This probe is running away to deep space because it's afraid it will have to work at FoxConn if it ever returns to Earth.

    1. Re:It's Running Away by Wolvenhaven · · Score: 1

      Well at least it wasn't built by FoxConn, otherwise it would have jumped "off" into the gravity well and smashed itself to pieces on the ground.

      --
      Orwell was an optimist.
    2. Re:It's Running Away by MikeDirnt69 · · Score: 1

      Moon Space Probe Ventures Deep Into Chinese? OH NOES!

      --
      Am I eval()? - http://www.monst3r.com.br
  2. China's expanding in space... by Volante3192 · · Score: 2

    And we're cutting back. What do they know that we don't? Hmm...

    1. Re:China's expanding in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2012 is approaching, along with the first official aliens contact.

    2. Re:China's expanding in space... by Zeek40 · · Score: 2

      How to manage their economy.

    3. Re:China's expanding in space... by beschra · · Score: 2

      It's what we know that they don't: been there done that

      --
      It is unwise to ascribe motive
    4. Re:China's expanding in space... by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      They know that eventually we have to pay back the debt or start a war.

    5. Re:China's expanding in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nations go through cycles. China is scientifically where we were in the 1970s/80s.

    6. Re:China's expanding in space... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That education and the pursuit of knowledge is a GOOD thing, not just for "intellectual elitists."

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    7. Re:China's expanding in space... by tripwire45 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We're in the middle of three wars (including Yemen) but our economy hasn't gotten any better.

    8. Re:China's expanding in space... by tloh · · Score: 1

      Which space craft has already visited L2?

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    9. Re:China's expanding in space... by thrich81 · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is a common meme, but I don't think it holds up objectively. For example, the US currently has an operating lunar orbiter (Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter) as well as operating spacecraft in orbit around Mercury, Mars, and Saturn. The US will soon be launching a new orbiter to Jupiter. The US Dawn spacecraft will enter orbit around the asteroid Vesta this July. This is a golden age for US planetary exploration. The US manned program is hitting a slow spot, which gets all the news and it remains to be seen what happens to the unmanned budget in coming years but the US will have to do a lot of "cutting back" before anyone else is even close.

    10. Re:China's expanding in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe, Herschel Space Observatory and Planck space observatory" (Wikipedia)

    11. Re:China's expanding in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, what do we know that they don't???

    12. Re:China's expanding in space... by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 3, Informative

      Are we? We're cutting back on Apollo-style manned stunts, but thats about it. We have a moon mission and two deep space missions launching in the next 6 months, with plenty already in flight and plenty more in development. The last round of mission prioritization pushed to do a lot of smaller missions rather than a few big ones -- different, but certainly not cutting back.

    13. Re:China's expanding in space... by ATestR · · Score: 1

      Actually four wars, including Yemen. Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Yemen. Admittedly Iraq is pretty much over, but we've still got a fair number of troops there.

      --
      âoeAny society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
    14. Re:China's expanding in space... by cavreader · · Score: 2

      They are not too worried seeing how they are still investing in US securities and bonds. Also people tend to overestimate the amount of securities they have purchased which was only about 7% of all outstanding issues.

    15. Re:China's expanding in space... by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      1. Iraq
      2. Afghanistan
      3. Libya
      4. Yemen
      5. Drugs
      6. Poverty (lost)
      7. Terrorism
      8. Iran (Cyber)
      9. Cuba (Economic)

      I'm probably forgetting a few.

      10. Pakistan (pardon us while we bomb your sovereign territory).

      So, yes, three wars. For a surprisingly high value of three.

      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    16. Re:China's expanding in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe
      Herschel Space Observatory
      Planck space observatory

    17. Re:China's expanding in space... by Whiternoise · · Score: 5, Informative

      WMAP, Herschel and Planck are currently there. It's a useful spot for deep space monitoring because the Earth is always partially blocking radiation from the sun, and it [L2] is always in the same place relative to the Earth. Although Wikpedia doesn't say it, the L2 point is also the least energy intensive route to exit a 2-body system (neglecting doing things like slingshots). I would imagine that this is the reason that L2 was chosen rather than out of some deep interest in the point itself. Either that or they're kamikazi-ing into our space telescopes...

    18. Re:China's expanding in space... by the+linux+geek · · Score: 1

      The debt to the PRC is a tiny percentage of the US's total national debt. Stop repeating the "PRC owns the US" meme, because it's stupid.

    19. Re:China's expanding in space... by Volante3192 · · Score: 2

      Don't forget China's Shenzhou program, with more manned launches planned for next year.

    20. Re:China's expanding in space... by SoTerrified · · Score: 2, Informative

      And we're cutting back. What do they know that we don't? Hmm...

      What do the Chinese know that we don't?
      Math
      Science

      And in the US, we want creationism taught in biology classes and forbid schools from using the word 'gay'.

      'Nuff said.

    21. Re:China's expanding in space... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's because the US makes a big effort not to kill civilians, not to plunder and destroy everything but rather protect and rebuild. If they shifted to WWII era conquest and occupation you'd see profits - and roughly as much resentment as against the nazis (hello Godwin). The smart weapons are ridiculously expensive compared to just bombing the fuck out of everything. If they stopped giving a shit about protecting civilians and only protected themselves, answered all attacks with massive force, terrified the civilians into cooperating with them rather than Al-Quaeda you'd see costs plummet and profits soar. So it's not that war can't be profitable, just not the way the US is running them now.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    22. Re:China's expanding in space... by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      China has a few "Apollo-style manned stunts" coming up next year, planned at least. (Shenzhou program, which has already had successful manned launches.)

      We've been doing planetary probing for decades. Sure, the instruments have gotten more sensitive and we can fit more into a single launch, and don't get me wrong I've got nothing against probes and orbiters (Cassini-Huygens is awesome), but we're regressing to our mid 70s where space is concerned, while China's entering their 60s.

    23. Re:China's expanding in space... by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      Just because the next generation of manned spacecraft isn't launching a giant glider into orbit every launch doesn't mean that it is going back to the 1970s.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    24. Re:China's expanding in space... by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They know that they have shitloads of money while the traitors in congress are giving tax breaks to their corporate buddies to send our jobs overseas? Look up "GE tax break outsourcing" to really make yourself sick, here is a CEO bragging, and I quote "We're not sending the low skills jobs, we are sending the good jobs because that's where the money is now" while he cashes his big giant tax rebate check. Well no shit that is where the money is, that is because you and your douchebag traitor friends have shipped more than 21,000 FACTORIES overseas since 2001. Considering we are at war I don't know why these douchebags aren't lined up and shot for the traitors that they are.

      As for TFA enjoy it while you can China. These same douchebags you're making money on now will be more than happy to fuck you after they are done poisoning your land and exploiting everything they can, then they'll leave you with a shitload of superfund sites to deal with while they quietly cash out and find the next country to exploit.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    25. Re:China's expanding in space... by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 1

      Well, this article and discussion are more generally on deep space exploration, which implies probes, thus why I focused on probes.

      And we still have plenty of manned operations too. ISS is scheduled to fly till 2020 now, and we have multiple vehicles in development (Orion, Dragon, Dreamchaser), one of which has already flown unmanned. When I say stunts, I mean massively funded spectaculars that do surprisingly little to advance us on a sustainable path to human exploration -- Apollo gave up on that when they decided to take the fast and expensive route of a single giant russian nesting doll stack, and Constellation continued it when they abandoned ISRU and other 'risky' technologies in favor of massive rockets that kept ATK happy instead.

    26. Re:China's expanding in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, what do *we* know that they don't?

    27. Re:China's expanding in space... by jdray · · Score: 1

      11. Obesity (undeclared).

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    28. Re:China's expanding in space... by jdray · · Score: 1
      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    29. Re:China's expanding in space... by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's because the US makes a big effort not to kill civilians,

      While the US doesn't generally engage in atrocities (though there have been instances e.g. in Vietnam) their track record isn't exactly stellar. There's a big effort to keep it out of the US media, I'll grant you that but in the latest Iraq war there were a lot of reports of bombed hospitals and the like available to us not dependent on the US media.

      not to plunder and destroy everything but rather protect and rebuild.

      That's a joke, it's been true in exactly 1 case: world war 2. Again, in the latest middle eastern wars the "rebuilding effort" seem to be schemes to throw money at corporation friendly to the regime like Halliburton. What is built isn't worth shit, or it only gets half done and is of poor quality, funds go missing (9 billion of Iraqi oil money "missing" at last count), etc. (See for example Scandals, Military, Iraq War, Graft and Fraud

      If they shifted to WWII era conquest and occupation you'd see profits - and roughly as much resentment as against the nazis (hello Godwin). The smart weapons are ridiculously expensive compared to just bombing the fuck out of everything. If they stopped giving a shit about protecting civilians and only protected themselves, answered all attacks with massive force, terrified the civilians into cooperating with them rather than Al-Quaeda you'd see costs plummet and profits soar. So it's not that war can't be profitable, just not the way the US is running them now.

      The wars are plenty profitable. Not for the US government but for arms dealers, the corrupt contractors that swarm all over the occupied territories and the politicians that retire to cushy jobs on their boards. Follow the money (if it doesn't go "missing" that is.)

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    30. Re:China's expanding in space... by CraftyJack · · Score: 2

      You get in the capsule, and the rocket will Shenzhou into space?

    31. Re:China's expanding in space... by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      They know that they'll have plenty of radioactive material with which to fuel deep space craft due to their development of liquid fluoride thorium reactors. (That and they'll have limitless electricity as a cool byproduct...) See energyfromthorium.com Currently China is the only state actively pursuing LFTR development, though it was invented in America at the Oak Ridge National Lab.

    32. Re:China's expanding in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      # Education

    33. Re:China's expanding in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12. Smoking

    34. Re:China's expanding in space... by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      "Mr. Johnson, a former chief economist for the International Monetary Fund, estimated that China owns about $1 trillion in U.S. Treasury securities, or nearly half the $2.37 trillion stock of Treasury debt held by “foreign official” owners."

      That's a trillion out of a total of 14 trillion. Plenty to economically ruin the US if they decided is worth a trillion dollars to them to do so. They just need to announce they want to sell a significant portion of it because they lack confidence in the dollar and the US economy will be in the toilet. Or they could just announce that they won't be buying half when the US next sells treasuries for the same effect.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    35. Re:China's expanding in space... by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      China expanding into space? Really?
       
      This is one probe, and when stacked with their (proceeding at a continental drift pace) manned program... Doesn't at all compare with what the US is accomplishing [1], let alone what it has accomplished.
       
      I'm as concerned about where the US is going as the next guy, but let's leave the ignorant, ill educated, and reflexive US bashing a rest shall we?
       
      [1] One probe at Mercury, one rover and and two orbiters at Mars, one probe in the Asteroid Belt, and a probe at Saturn. There's also a probe in Lunar orbit. Then there's the solar observatories. And Hubble. And the Voyagers. *Whew*, I'm out of breath and I haven't listed the probes on their way or the ones under construction yet.

    36. Re:China's expanding in space... by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      The problem with doing that is they will be destroying a big segment of their market. When the US economy revamped and recovered they'd find it might be a lot more competitive also. Best to leave sleeping dogs alone.

    37. Re:China's expanding in space... by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      They can't just demand the money, not legally. its on a fixed payment schedule. They can't do much more than stop issuing new debt.

    38. Re:China's expanding in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is fought on an every widening front and is allready Lost!

    39. Re:China's expanding in space... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      If you're going to be a douche though it's cheaper to just befriend evil-doers. Why bother mercilessly bombing countries that piss you off when you can just ignore them and pat them on the back.

    40. Re:China's expanding in space... by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      I'm as concerned about where the US is going as the next guy, but let's leave the ignorant, ill educated, and reflexive US bashing a rest shall we?

      Always better to be concerned early. If, in 10 years, we're still without a manned spacecraft, the ISS is in decay due to a lack of heavy lifters to get it back in a stabler LEO, meanwhile the Chinese have Heping orbiting and regular launches to it...well, there's much more ground to cover

      Plus the earlier you show concern, the bigger your 'I told you so' rights are.

    41. Re:China's expanding in space... by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      Yeah it's basically a M.A.D. scenario, all bets are off if one of the two tries anything.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    42. Re:China's expanding in space... by the+linux+geek · · Score: 1

      Did you read your own article? It specifically says that even the "real" number is about a trillion dollars. The US debt is between $14tn and $15tn. What universe do you live in that has the kind of math where 1/14 is "almost half"?

    43. Re:China's expanding in space... by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      No, they can dump them on the market destroying the US treasury market though.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    44. Re:China's expanding in space... by murdocj · · Score: 1

      The USA has landers on Mars, is orbiting Mercury, is putting up telescopes that can probe back to the very origin of the universe, has 2 probes venturing outside the solar system, has private companies starting up space tourism... and yet, somehow, it's not enough, because the Chinese have launched a couple of guys into earth orbit.

      Suppose the position was reversed. The Chinese landed on the moon in the 1960's, currently had probes and landers all over the solar system, had been partners with the Russians for years on a space station, and the USA was just starting to launch the Gemini program. Would you feel like the USA was forging ahead? I doubt it. This is just the usual angst of being able to see all of the weaknesses and delays in the USA program, and only hearing the trumpeted successes of the Chinese program.

    45. Re:China's expanding in space... by murdocj · · Score: 1

      Ok... suppose the USA never ever launches another manned space mission. 10 years from now the Chinese have the equivalent of the ISS and 25-30 years from now they land on the moon. Remind me of how this will be a disaster for the USA?

    46. Re:China's expanding in space... by Palmsie · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, when their housing bubble pops they'll wish they retrieved all that extra fuel and metal.

      --
      Carl Sagan quotes get you an automatic +5 on all posts.
    47. Re:China's expanding in space... by Chardansearavitriol · · Score: 0

      My issue is the relative...I dont want to say incompetence because its not that, but lets call it "disregard for long term consequences of short-term actions." China's blown up like what, two satellites in orbit? Thats not a very nice thing to do if you know much about what happens when things moving really fast hit other things that are moving really fast.

    48. Re:China's expanding in space... by cavreader · · Score: 1

      That's the rub. The US is castigated for waging wars and they are also castigated when they leave people alone. I would prefer to leave them alone and use pragmatism combined with some mild amorality as the basic tenets of all US foreign policy.

    49. Re:China's expanding in space... by blackpaw · · Score: 1

      5. Drugs is lost as well.

    50. Re:China's expanding in space... by tftp · · Score: 2

      The US is castigated for waging wars and they are also castigated when they leave people alone.

      This is a self-inflicted problem. A country needs to be consistent in its policy. But the USA goes into Somalia, then ignores it; doesn't go into Rwanda or Zimbabwe but attacks Iraq; doesn't touch North Korea but bombs Pakistan but isn't at war with it; threatens Iran that hasn't attacked the USA but bows to Saudis who did, and then illegally intervenes in local disputes in Northern Africa...

    51. Re:China's expanding in space... by tftp · · Score: 2

      What universe do you live in that has the kind of math where 1/14 is "almost half"?

      You can sleep well knowing that you owe $14K to your father. However a $1K debt to the local crime boss may kill you.

    52. Re:China's expanding in space... by tftp · · Score: 1

      Remind me of how this will be a disaster for the USA?

      Manned spaceflight itself is largely pointless these days, but it is a useful indicator. Space capabilities closely follow the economic and scientific might of a country.

      Besides, if you have a well funded lab with brilliant scientists you always have a chance to discover something that changes the world (and you will be in control of that something.) If you have a well funded law office with brilliant lawyers you won't discover anything of value to the rest of the humanity.

    53. Re:China's expanding in space... by duhjim · · Score: 1

      12. Smoking

      If they had criminalized smoking no one would have stopped.

    54. Re:China's expanding in space... by ridgecritter · · Score: 2

      "If they stopped giving a shit about protecting civilians and only protected themselves, answered all attacks with massive force, terrified the civilians into cooperating with them rather than Al-Quaeda you'd see costs plummet and profits soar."

      IIRC, these tactics didn't work out so well for the Soviets in Afghanistan....

    55. Re:China's expanding in space... by cavreader · · Score: 0

      No, the problem exists because the so called "international community" couldn't recognize a principle if they fell over it. Europe prefers to participate in never ending negotiations which never yield any results. China and Russia just ignore everything that doesn't directly effect them and the US government gets involved then they should across the board. And of course the middle eastern and African countries are too busy creating the international problems leaving them very little time to contribute anything positive to international relationships. I think the US needs to adopt the Russian and Chinese methods and just do whatever it takes to maintain the necessary trade agreements but offer up nothing else. This includes not supporting any economic or military sanctions on any country no matter what. This would include countries like Iraq and Iran. The US needs to stop giving billions of dollars to other countries for little or no return on the investment. And finally the US military should only be used to defend the US interests.

    56. Re:China's expanding in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shame! You forgot to say "too cheap to meter". What do they teach at astrotrurfing school these days? Blech.

    57. Re:China's expanding in space... by spongman · · Score: 1

      I don't know why

      because those are the douchebags that pay the politicians who pay the media companies to tell you who to vote for.

    58. Re:China's expanding in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's because the US makes a big effort not to kill civilians, not to plunder and destroy everything but rather protect and rebuild. If they shifted to WWII era conquest and occupation you'd see profits - and roughly as much resentment as against the nazis (hello Godwin). The smart weapons are ridiculously expensive compared to just bombing the fuck out of everything. If they stopped giving a shit about protecting civilians and only protected themselves, answered all attacks with massive force, terrified the civilians into cooperating with them rather than Al-Quaeda you'd see costs plummet and profits soar. So it's not that war can't be profitable, just not the way the US is running them now.

      uhhh mate...im from pakistan and civilians do get killed in drone attacks. im probably more anti-alquaeda than any1 you have ever known (because the bast*rds are trying to force us into becoming something similar to Afghanistan which except for guns and rockets has slid back into stone-age) but im also totally against killing civilians just because they live in an area where the once-american-backed 'mujahideen' have crossed the border from Afghanistan to Pakistan (lets not forget, alquaeda has its roots in the people funded by the US against Soviet Union when the Soviets planted a dummy pro-Soviet govt. in Afghanistan). We are a sovereign nation (or so we like to think) and if the drone attacks don't stop soon, the American govt. would further destabilize Pakistan (they have already destabilized it) and heh just think about it like this, if someone comes along kills someone you care for and then brands them a terrorist when you know they were not (i dont think anyone in their right mind would believe kids under 5 could be terrorists) and you know the legal system can't do anything about it, what would you do?

      I dunno, iv lived in the uk for a couple of years and I know some amazing people from there and I believe things would be pretty much the same in US too but the way the american govt. is behaving at the moment, its only pushing otherwise moderate people towards extremism and I for one would much rather not have my country hijacked by gun totting, beard wielding, turban wearing zealots!

      Hahaa, i kno il get modded to kingdom come so il just post anon.

    59. Re:China's expanding in space... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      We're in the middle of three wars (including Yemen) but our economy hasn't gotten any better.

      Really? I'm obviously not keeping up with the news.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    60. Re:China's expanding in space... by AlterEager · · Score: 1

      China's blown up like what, two satellites in orbit? Thats not a very nice thing to do if you know much about what happens when things moving really fast hit other things that are moving really fast.

      Both the US and the (then) USSR have also tested ASAT weapons.

    61. Re:China's expanding in space... by AlterEager · · Score: 1

      Did you read your own article? It specifically says that even the "real" number is about a trillion dollars. The US debt is between $14tn and $15tn. What universe do you live in that has the kind of math where 1/14 is "almost half"?

      The article says:

      China owns about $1 trillion in U.S. Treasury securities, or nearly half the $2.37 trillion stock of Treasury debt held by âoeforeign officialâ owners.

      I.E. China holds almost half of the debt held by foreigners.

      The other ~ $12 trillion is held by Americans.

    62. Re:China's expanding in space... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If they stopped giving a shit about protecting civilians and only protected themselves, answered all attacks with massive force, terrified the civilians into cooperating with them rather than Al-Quaeda you'd see costs plummet and profits soar

      Those civilians are supposed to be the reason our troops are there in the first place, so it would be a bit fucking stupid to make them suffer enormously just for our convenience. That's not exactly going to win hearts and minds. We are supposed to be a liberating, not an invasion force.
      When Allied troops were fighting the Germans in France and Belgium in 1944 they most certainly didn't go around bombing French and Belgian civilians willy nilly. When the war at the end moved into Germany, that was a different matter.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    63. Re:China's expanding in space... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      And finally the US military should only be used to defend the US interests.

      The US has a strong interest in oil rich Middle Eastern countries.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    64. Re:China's expanding in space... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      uhhh mate...im from pakistan

      Which will be read by most people in the US as: I'm a terrorist, so you can ignore everything I say as it's just Al-Qaeda propaganda

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    65. Re:China's expanding in space... by matfud · · Score: 1

      And one of the earliest was a nuke that managed to destroy one of the first coms satellites. It made me chuckle when I found that out.

    66. Re:China's expanding in space... by murdocj · · Score: 1

      Well, we do have a bunch of smart guys working on space flight, e.g. John Carmack. They just don't happen to work for the government.

      Don't get me wrong, I grew up on science fiction, I do believe humans will someday walk on other worlds, and it drives me nuts that if I could just raise enough money and overcome some phobias I could fly to the ISS. But no one, and I mean NO ONE, has come up with a rationale as to why it has to happen now, when the USA is already in the hole. Sure, research is good... but we could be researching maglev trains, or advanced robotics, or deep sea exploration, .... Preservation of humanity? For a fraction of the cost of establishing a Mars base that probably wouldn't survive if a catastrophe hit earth, we could have isolated self-sufficient habitats scattered around the earth. National prestige and competition? That one isn't even a rationale, it's just chest beating.

      And it's not like the USA is doing nothing... we have probes all over the solar system. I know people "want it all, and want it now" but sometimes that just isn't a good idea.

    67. Re:China's expanding in space... by morgaen · · Score: 1

      13. Apostrophe's

    68. Re:China's expanding in space... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They are managing the US too.

      Back in the 90s there was a property boom in Malaysia and South Korea, largely funded by US investment. It all went sour of course, similar to our own economic problems at the end of the 2000s.

      China decided that they would never allow the US to do that again by managing them. They lent huge amounts of money to the US, keeping their currency artificially low to make loans more favourable. They now have such a large stake in the US economy that any action that might damage the Chinese economy is basically mutually assured destruction.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    69. Re:China's expanding in space... by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      Right. Astroturfing with a four digit userid. Believe it or not there are genuine grassroots groups in the world, even for things like nuclear energy. The thorium energy group is one of them.

    70. Re:China's expanding in space... by cavreader · · Score: 1

      Like I said the US should only do the minimum required to maintain the trade arrangments currently in place. China completely ignores the genocide in the Sudan because that might disrupt the flow of oil to them. The US and other western countries have to deal with dictators and tyrants if they do not want a disruption in oil production. And while middle east oil production does effect the global economy the US does not import the majority of it's oil from them. The majoirty of the oil imports come from Canada, Mexico, Venezuela, and local sources. Other than oil the entire middle east contributes nothing to world except minority persecution, tyrannical leaders using religious dogma to suppress it's citizens, and of course the export of fanatical terrorists bent on venting their rage around the world. Alternative energy development is the key to fixing some of the most dire problems we face today, These problems include the environment, increased militarism in the fight for dwindling resources, and reducing the reliance on unstable countries and leaders.

    71. Re:China's expanding in space... by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it's checking that you actually do what you claim you are doing?

      --
      This is blinging
    72. Re:China's expanding in space... by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I thought 'The probe is expected to perform exploration at L2' sounded weird.

      Er, yup, here we are at L2, uh, look at all the L2-ness around here! Man if I knew there was this much awesomeness at L2, I'd have come here long ago.

      --
      ...
    73. Re:China's expanding in space... by khallow · · Score: 1

      If they shifted to WWII era conquest and occupation you'd see profits - and roughly as much resentment as against the nazis (hello Godwin).

      Why? Either way you're shifting massive amounts of resources around just to break stuff. The broken-window fallacy is still a fallacy. The Second World War was good for US business for two reasons. The US had to undo many of FDR's destructive Great Depression policies in order to effectively wage war. Second, US business was well positioned to profit from the eventual rebuilding of Europe and elsewhere following the war.

    74. Re:China's expanding in space... by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      By "Apollo-style manned stunts" are we talking a moonshot? If so, and you could give me a source, I would be most grateful.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    75. Re:China's expanding in space... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      And in the US, we want creationism taught in biology classes and forbid schools from using the word 'gay'.

      Not just the US, they try to teach that crap in UK religious schools too.

      It is simply a result of Europe, and by extension the US and parts of Africa, being gripped by monotheistic religions for over a thousand years. Buddhism is barely what I would call a religion, more like an organised philosophy with associated rituals. The key difference is that in Christianity there is only one truth and it gets handed down from on high, so anything contradictory that a mere mortal thought up must be rejected.

      In China and Japan belief in evolution is near universal because they are free to figure stuff out for themselves. Creation stories are just that, stories; not contradictory to scientific theory. The creation myth in the Bible is seen as historical record. Islam is even worse because the Koran is supposed to be the literal word of God, where as at least since the Bible's authorship is acknowledged it allows a bit more interpretation. In fact the Bible must be seen as a collection of non-literal accounts because they contradict each other in places.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    76. Re:China's expanding in space... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Your problem is that none of these are actual wars. A war is between nation states and ends when they agree to, typically by one side forcing the other to capitulate. The US is not in a declared war with any other nation. Instead it is fighting insurgents, terrorists and criminals in their own countries.

      There is no way to end these non-wars. The drug trade is too lucrative to stamp out because there will always be an endless supply of people with nothing to lose and everything to gain by producing them. The War on Terror is self perpetuating. Iraq and Afghanistan are basically down to when their respective governments can look after themselves.

      This isn't war, this is the new peace.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    77. Re:China's expanding in space... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      While the US doesn't generally engage in atrocities (though there have been instances e.g. in Vietnam) their track record isn't exactly stellar. There's a big effort to keep it out of the US media, I'll grant you that but in the latest Iraq war there were a lot of reports of bombed hospitals and the like available to us not dependent on the US media.

      I'm not defending or condemning the US military, but I think we do have to accept that these things happen in a war and are basically unavoidable. Therefore when we decide to start military action we as civilians must accept responsibility because we know that civilian deaths and outright war crimes are inevitable.

      A soldier is put in a stressful and confusing situation. It is even worse than a normal war in Iraq and Afghanistan because literally anyone could be an insurgent planning to blow themselves up or grab and AK47 and start shooting at you. Human beings have a strong desire not to die and will make mistakes under pressure, killing civilians. After a while the psychological effects lead to some pretty fucked up behaviour, and while we now do a lot more than we did back in the 60s to prevent soldiers getting to the stage where they do commit atrocities we still see things like the prison abuses in Iraq from time to time.

      That is just human nature. When we decide to send troops somewhere, or even just arm the "good guys" like in Libya, we have to accept that it won't just be the "bad guys" who get killed or do bad things.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    78. Re:China's expanding in space... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The most insightful pos since ... a very long time ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  3. Expecting to find something? by sphealey · · Score: 1

    > The probe is expected to perform exploration at L2.

    What do they expect to explore at the L2 point? It is just an empty spot in space.

    sPh

    And any alien reconnaissance satellites parked there would presumably be stealthed.

    1. Re:Expecting to find something? by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Stealthed or not the Chinese can try to run into them.

    2. Re:Expecting to find something? by Lifyre · · Score: 1

      Maybe they won't be paying attention and we'll (the human we) find them by playing a little bumper tag.

      --
      I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
    3. Re:Expecting to find something? by bigrockpeltr · · Score: 1

      and then we will all get cheap knock offs of their cloaking technology

      --
      $ unzip, strip, touch, finger, grep, mount, fsck, more, yes,fsck,fsck,fsck,umount, sleep
    4. Re:Expecting to find something? by tloh · · Score: 4, Informative

      From the Wikipedia article on Lagrangian point:

      "The Sun-Earth L2 is a good spot for space-based observatories. Because an object around L2 will maintain the same orientation with respect to the Sun and Earth, shielding and calibration are much simpler."

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    5. Re:Expecting to find something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's a spot with at least three observatories (ours, not aliens) already parked there.

      Could be an escalation of the anti-satellite wars -- major bragging rights for "first deep-space takeout"! (No, I'm not serious)

    6. Re:Expecting to find something? by jdray · · Score: 1

      More likely they said, "Hey, we're done with this moon survey mission and have a bunch of gas left. What do we do with this big collection of observation instruments? Oh, I know, let's send it out to a spot where it's good to put observatories."

      Only they probably said it in Chinese.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    7. Re:Expecting to find something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humor, how does it work?

    8. Re:Expecting to find something? by Lifyre · · Score: 1

      Cheap or not it would be cool

      --
      I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
    9. Re:Expecting to find something? by blackanvil · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't take much to add in an area denial ability, just something that at the right time exothermically disassembles the probe into lots of rapidly moving debris. They'll already be headed in the right direction, and theoretically have a shotgun-like effect on a large portion of the L2 area, quite likely at least damaging a stealthed alien reconnaissance satellite.

    10. Re:Expecting to find something? by frozentier · · Score: 1

      I just wonder since when the Lagrange points constitute "deep space". I thought deep space started around the edge of the solar system or something.

    11. Re:Expecting to find something? by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 1

      As far as NASA is concerned, deep space means anything outside of the Earth-Moon system.

      You're thinking interstellar space, where the Voyagers are approaching now.

    12. Re:Expecting to find something? by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 1

      I can't say for sure what they plan, but Earth-Moon L2 point is also a good hopping off point to to hit a lot of interesting places.

      If you can match up the equal-energy contours in the Earth-Moon system with similar contours in the Earth-Sun system you can escape from the Earth system with a very modest maneuvers. The GRAIL mission launching in a few months is a good example of this (going the other way). This could make it pretty easy some new asteroids that have never been imaged before, and you could even potentially take these kinds of paths out to other planets -- this is the so-called Interplanetary Superhighway.

      I'd imagine their intention is less to explore the L2 point, and more to explore *from* the L2 point.

  4. Translation: by d3ac0n · · Score: 1, Funny

    After completing its 6-month moon survey mission, China's second moon orbiter, Chang'e-2, was found to be in excellent condition and has abundant fuel left, and so it set off from its moon orbit into deep space,

    Translation from Sino-Orwellian to plain English:

    After crashing into the sea upon launch, PLAN has decided to claim that the orbiter is doing so well they've sent it off into deep space, never to return.

    --
    Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    1. Re:Translation: by Dyinobal · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm not sure what it says about china but I'm not able to dismiss this theory right out of hand.

    2. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what it says about China, but I do know what it means about you.

    3. Re:Translation: by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 4, Informative

      I can see from your sig that you're not easily swayed by pesky things like FACTS, but I'll try, anyways.

    4. Re:Translation: by Gohtar · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't find this hard to believe, a fake press release was, errr.., released by the Chinese, about one of their rockets that was still sitting on the launch pad. They called the mission a success, it even came complete with transcripts of dialogue between the astronauts and the ground.

    5. Re:Translation: by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Informative

      Translation from Sino-Orwellian to plain English:

      After crashing into the sea upon launch, PLAN has decided to claim that the orbiter is doing so well they've sent it off into deep space, never to return.

      Except, I believe at a minimum, the US and Russia have the tools to verify this, and would have tracked it had it crashed into the ocean. Possibly anyone with ICBMs or a space program.

      I'm pretty sure if anybody tried to 'claim' they'd gone to L2 but had crashed into the ocean ... it would be easy to disprove them. There's likely enough ground-based observation equipment to be able to confirm this.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    6. Re:Translation: by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      I know it's kinda tricky to comprehend for some people on the American Right, but PRC and DPRK are two different countries.

    7. Re:Translation: by SilentStaid · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't know. Maybe he was just going on idle speculation.

      Or just maybe some of us aren't politically correct enough to ignore the simple fact that it wouldn't be the first time the PRC (got caught) made a cover up for something that would be global news.

    8. Re:Translation: by tloh · · Score: 1

      I don't find this hard to believe, a fake press release was, errr.., released by the Chinese, about one of their rockets that was still sitting on the launch pad. They called the mission a success, it even came complete with transcripts of dialogue between the astronauts and the ground.

      source?

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    9. Re:Translation: by Gohtar · · Score: 1

      It was a slashdot article and here is a wikipedia link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shenzhou_7#False_news_report

  5. Crap! by NEDHead · · Score: 1

    I was going to park there...

    1. Re:Crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am from Chicago, I own the parking meter that is there, at L2.

  6. How do you spell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'V'Ger' in Mandarin Chinese?

  7. What Processors and OSes on Board? by joelsherrill · · Score: 1

    I am curious if anyone here knows that microprocessors and OSes they are using on the craft and its instruments.

    1. Re:What Processors and OSes on Board? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 4, Funny

      We won't be able to tell for a few more years until the logos they painted over wear through.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:What Processors and OSes on Board? by jongalbreath · · Score: 1

      Well played!

  8. Sceptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to remember a Chinese press release that detailed the successful launch of a space craft including chatter between the pilots and ground crew, that came out before the rocket had even been lit....

    And lets not forget the fireworks during the Olympics.

    1. Re:Sceptical by adonoman · · Score: 2

      You do realize that the US also scripts "chatter" back and forth between the ground crew and the flight crew? They very likely also write up press releases ahead of time that only get changed when something doesn't follow the plan. That China would do the same thing isn't at all surprising, or even deceiptful. The issue is one of incompetance at being unable to control release times.

  9. Several space observatories already occupy L2 - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    - the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe, Herschel Space Observatory and Planck Space Observatory. One would hope the Chinese would take steps not only to avoid crashing into those but also to avoid interrupting the science those are performing. I'm sure the ops people for all of those craft are scrambling now to understand what the Chinese are doing and what they might have to do to compensate.

    Usually all the contingencies for a spacecraft are worked out long in advance - I think it disingenuous to suggest they just decided to take a joy ride with their remaining fuel.

    1. Re:Several space observatories already occupy L2 - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, i have a hard time believing the whole, "we had fuel left over" bit too. on spacecraft weights are measured out to astounding precision! everyone includes a little fudge factor for unseen problems (drift etc.), but not enough to extend the mission that far. The weight that the extra rocket fuel occupied could have been used for other sensors.

      the mars rovers have only continued on for so long because they are harvesting energy in situ, rocket fuel is non-replenishable and hard to get into orbit in the first place.

    2. Re:Several space observatories already occupy L2 - by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      [PLC Translated to English]We missed our target and now have no idea where the spacecraft is going.[/PLC Translated to English]

    3. Re:Several space observatories already occupy L2 - by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Space is astronomically large. The odds of an accidental collision are astronomically small. If their satellite hits one of ours, it will have been intentional.

    4. Re:Several space observatories already occupy L2 - by vuo · · Score: 2

      These are actually in Lissajous orbits around L2. Just like a massive body, L2 is an energy minimum. You can put satellites in orbit around it, even in several different orientations even though it's empty space.

    5. Re:Several space observatories already occupy L2 - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but in all fairness, we still have a Mars Rover or two bustling about that were not supposed to last as long as they have/are/will. Opportunity. Spirit. One of them is dead : )

    6. Re:Several space observatories already occupy L2 - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How "big" is the Lagrange point? How many spacecrafts can it accommodate?

    7. Re:Several space observatories already occupy L2 - by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be too optimistic.

      Recall that there was neither a great deal of planning (apparently) nor forethought in their demolition of a satellite in LEO what, 2 summers ago?

      --
      -Styopa
  10. Alternative headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Chinese Moon Probe Delivers"

  11. Human inherit SPACE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is good to know that humans will one day treat space as their play ground. To bad its not USA humans.

  12. Maybe... by Roduku · · Score: 3, Funny

    they want to check out that shack outside Lagrange

  13. Space Travel: Unfit for Humanity by eyenot · · Score: 0, Troll

    Space Travel - Unfit for Humanity
    by Gabriel Arthur Petrie, 11-22-2009

    A lot of people on Earth would like to believe that one day, maybe even in their own lifetimes, humanity will reach for the stars in great shimmering vessels. Scientists, sci-fi fans, new-age believers, and imaginative young people around the world share a common dream of exploring and colonizing the near and distant planets, even one day meeting with fellow intelligent races in this galaxy or perhaps, given enough travel time, some other galaxy.

    These dreams are all very grandiose, and as engineering visions go, even noble. That we can as a species manage to conquer the stars is a warming and supportive sentiment. That we can actually achieve it within our limited means and resources from Earth is, conversely, as flighty and half-baked as any idea anyone could have. And to actually embark upon such a project, with the world's situation as it is now and obviously for the rest of time, is selfish, rude, arrogant, perhaps sadistic, and surely despotic and tyrannical if on behalf of any government.

    The resources required for such an undertaking may exist here on Earth in one form or another, but those resources are too direly needed by the planet's current population to allow it all to be seized up in some dream works that are not guaranteed to produce any positive results.

    The inventions brought to us by the space programs of the past are just that -- inventions, not discoveries. There is no cosmos full of advances in textiles, communications, and soft drinks waiting for us to grab it all up. If anything, we might feel sad at the wealth of new things we have in our lives brought to us by the space program, because it means there are fewer things left to be invented in the future, therefore we face a less valuable future in space program commodities enrichment.

    Anyone who unwaveringly insists that there are infinite worthwhile inventions for humans (or infinite ways to improve upon what commodities do exist) has as much sense as an inbred dog and need not read further (for objective truth is wasted upon them). I should not have to explain the faulted logic behind those sorts of beliefs, and it is sad that the space program has so many supporters by way of pure stupidity. In any case, to dispel such sturdy beliefs tends to require more example than explanation, and short of witnessing firsthand the dismal ruin of humanity due to the prolonged pursuit of this sci-fi "space-faring" drama, there is not much that can convince the shuttle-hugger to change their ways.

    Now, I am not saying that the space program is pure nonsense or entirely worthless. Who knows, there may be a few more inventions or advances in Earthly science that can be mined from space program research projects, but all of this can be achieved in near space. For the sake of using the space program for mere scientific advancements in entirely unrelated fields, there is no need whatsoever to set our sights on far-off places.

    And metaphor be damned: this isn't a matter of the poor, humble telescope viewer being suppressed by the superstitious monarch, or a matter of how little we would know now were it not for those brave enough to cross forbidden seas in the distant past.

    Building and manning a ship, making a voyage to presumably the edge of the flat earth, these are undertakings that consumed, historically, so little resource overall that compared to today's energy consumption (in, say, Spain) it is not even a fraction of a drop in a bucket. Conversely, when we talk about travel to distant stars and humanity's future among them, we're speaking of energy consumption measurable in the mineral wealth of whole planets, starting with our own, and environmental impacts that will never, ever be recovered from, right here on our home planet. And as for suppression, there simply isn't anyone to blame any more: this is a round planet and that's all that it is, and those boundaries are more firm and more unyielding than any belief that keeps one from

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    1. Re:Space Travel: Unfit for Humanity by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      As if reality isn't depressing enough as it is, you gotta go shit in my cheerios.

      Well, I guess there's always more liquor...

    2. Re:Space Travel: Unfit for Humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you think humans lack the resources to attempt space travel, consider exchanging the budgets of NASA and the Department of Defense for a few years. NASA has done a fairly good job with a ridiculously small fraction of the USA's resources. Commit some small, constant fraction of humanity's annual output to spaceflight, and you will surely see better results from it than from a lot other pursuits.

    3. Re:Space Travel: Unfit for Humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gabriel Arthur Petrie is this century's leader of the Luddites. I like how he slags off anyone who disagrees with him as "inbred dogs". Nice logical fallacy. But the reference to "inbred dogs" ties back to some of his other writings where he suggests that the foolish people of the word should be, you know, gotten rid of, to make room for more enlightened people like himself. Oh, and he is a Wikipedia contributor of course.

    4. Re:Space Travel: Unfit for Humanity by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The resources required for such an undertaking may exist here on Earth in one form or another, but those resources are too direly needed by the planet's current population to allow it all to be seized up in some dream works that are not guaranteed to produce any positive results.

      The inventions brought to us by the space programs of the past are just that -- inventions, not discoveries. There is no cosmos full of advances in textiles, communications, and soft drinks waiting for us to grab it all up.

      I choose "ever onward" over "let's stay in our caves, where it's warm". For one, there are vast, valuable resources right here in our solar system. Perhaps one day, we'll be able to profitably harvest them. And perhaps we'll invent a few things along the way, such as advances in textiles, I mean propulsion, materials, and control systems. And with those advances in science and engineering, perhaps we'll send something to another star some day, at a reasonable cost as well.

      If anything, we might feel sad at the wealth of new things we have in our lives brought to us by the space program, because it means there are fewer things left to be invented in the future, therefore we face a less valuable future in space program commodities enrichment.

      Anyone who unwaveringly insists that there are infinite worthwhile inventions for humans (or infinite ways to improve upon what commodities do exist) has as much sense as an inbred dog and need not read further (for objective truth is wasted upon them).

      And if anything, pretty much anyone in the past who thought we had reached the pinnacle of knowledge in one field or another, has been proven wrong time and time again. Sure, it doesn't make much sense to send a probe to another star now. But anyone who unwaveringly insists that there will never be a mission to another star (or profits to be derived thereof) has as much sense as an inbred dog and need not comment further.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  14. Wait a minute! by somaTh · · Score: 1

    That's no moon probe!

    --
    Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    1. Re:Wait a minute! by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      It's a space station probe?

    2. Re:Wait a minute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      phew at least it's not Pauls' finger!

  15. made in china? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China,
    The secret's out. If you can build electronics that can orbit the moon, I expect you to start making electronics that don't fall apart after 90 days of use.
    Sincerely,
    Spoiled US Consumer

  16. Deep Space 2? by dsinc · · Score: 1

    Things will only get interesting when it's headed to Deep Space 9...

    1. Re:Deep Space 2? by X0563511 · · Score: 1
      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  17. So What?? by spam4rakesh · · Score: 2

    I fail to understand why it has to be a race. If the Chinese want to go ahead we should let them. Why is it that we want to always stop others from doing something? Do we think that we can always be the dominant country in the world ?or for that matter any other country can continue to be the dominant country for ever ?

    1. Re:So What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I fail to understand why it has to be a race. If the Chinese want to go ahead we should let them. Why is it that we want to always stop others from doing something?
      Do we think that we can always be the dominant country in the world ?or for that matter any other country can continue to be the dominant country for ever ?

      No one said anything about stopping them. Generally, things get done in America when there is an adversary; someone to beat, measure against, and out perform. After what WWII and the Cold War gave us, we've grown tired playing in our sand box, so we need something else.

    2. Re:So What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because if we don't want it, or convince the culture to not want it, we WILL die as a culture and replaced with something that IS willing to try.

    3. Re:So What?? by Orffen · · Score: 2

      It doesn't have to be a race. We can put it off for a couple hundred years, maybe tool around here on Earth a while longer.

      But then when we decide we want to go up and the Chinese say "no I don't think so" while pointing their space lasers at us, it might be a bit hard to get there.

      Kennedy said it best at Rice - "Whether it will become a force for good or ill depends on man, and only if the United States occupies a position of pre-eminence can we help decide whether this new ocean will be a sea of peace or a new terrifying theater of war. ... There is no strife, no prejudice, no national conflict in outer space as yet. Its hazards are hostile to us all. Its conquest deserves the best of all mankind, and its opportunity for peaceful cooperation many never come again."

      If we're to have a space overlord, I'd rather it be of the United States/Europe/Japan variety than the China variety.

    4. Re:So What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "we WILL die as a culture"

      And nothing of value was lost.

    5. Re:So What?? by thoughtsatthemoment · · Score: 1

      If we're to have a space overlord, I'd rather it be of the United States/Europe/Japan variety than the China variety.

      Neither of them have had a good track record as a land overload. Amazing people would blindly follow their "we are the good guy" crap.

    6. Re:So What?? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      It's hardly a race. L2 is -not- in deep space. Here's some numbers:

      The distance from earth to mars at it's shortest (eg when we are in a line with it and the sun) is about 54 million KM.

      The distance from the earth to the moon is about 0.4 million KM.

      The earth/sun L2 is about 1.5 million KM from the earth.

      Translation? When taken to scale, the L2 is practically still in our orbit. It's not deep space.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    7. Re:So What?? by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      Do we think that we can always be the dominant country in the world ?

      Why do you hate America?

    8. Re:So What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well. one space probe isnt much to worry about but i'd prefer not to let someone else establish bases first. a few rocks from space could seriously ruin the weekend ...

  18. War for Profit... WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not about war turning a profit, its about staying out of a economic collapse.

    1. Re:War for Profit... WRONG by jdray · · Score: 1

      Right. Because we're so adept at that.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
  19. Humanity: Unfit for Space Travel? by rlseaman · · Score: 1

    Um - your subject is backwards (and rather upside down). It is precisely in humanity's lofty aspirations that space travel has value. It is trivial to demonstrate that space travel cannot solve our population problems. However - solve the latter at home and the former comes back into play. There are indeed "infinite ways to improve upon what commodities do exist" - it's called evolution. The industrial revolution wasn't principally about commodities, it was about the means of production.

  20. If you've studied ancient Chinese erotic lit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...the thread title has an odd ring* to it, because (in Chinese erotic literature) imagery of the moon is used as a euphemism for anal intercourse. "The jade tree approaches the full moon", that sort of thing.

    (So I guess if your probe has ventured past the moon, and into deep space, the only thing to say is "Well, congratulations, you're all the way in, and the mission's a success. But I wouldn't go that much further unless you want to run into asteroids. Oh, also, there's a right turn coming up, and I'd REALLY prefer that you didn't miss that one.")

    *("Heh-heh, heh-heh, you said 'odd ring'...")

  21. Deep Space Exploration, brought to you by... by geekmux · · Score: 1

    ...Wal-Mart.

  22. insight between the words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "establish the country's capability"? wow. sounds so 50's, when countries had actual identities and limits, before the modern economy turned everything into a commodity. it's fascinating that Chinese state organs still think in those terms - not surprising, of course, but still charmingly dated. the truth, of course, is that anyone with the right pile of cash can go to the moon or L2 or ...

  23. I don't know where they're headed... by isomeme · · Score: 1

    ...but it's not L2, at least as described in the summary. The Earth-Luna L2 point is just 64500 km further out from Earth than the center of Luna, less than 1/6 of the Earth-Luna distance.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    1. Re:I don't know where they're headed... by isomeme · · Score: 1

      Replying to myself: It's heading for Sun-Earth L2, not Earth-Luna. I sit corrected.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    2. Re:I don't know where they're headed... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      It's still not deep space... hell it's still barely off the Earth's orbit!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  24. This is the metric system by clarkn0va · · Score: 1

    You can say "1.5 Gigameters".

    --
    I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
  25. they did at least one close pass, only 15 km up by sittingQuietly · · Score: 0

    and yet still didn't get photos of the Apollo debris. it was there six months, too

    this must be at least the fourth orbiter that cant find the time to photograph the stuff. Or something

    of course, the Hubble telescope was supposed but didn't either.

    Dear Chinese - next time please take a photo of the Apollo debris!

    1. Re:they did at least one close pass, only 15 km up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you are just trolling, but this will hopefully save needless replied.

      - LRO photographed Apollo landing sites, pictures are on the net (google for it)
      - 2.4m primary on the Hubble is too small to resolve Apollo landing sites (blame physics)

    2. Re:they did at least one close pass, only 15 km up by cusco · · Score: 1

      The moon is also much to bright to point Hubble at. Maybe earthshine might not overload the cameras, but sunshine illuminating the lunar surface could well damage them.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  26. China leaving 70s/80s ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nations go through cycles. China is scientifically where we were in the 1970s/80s.

    That's why they are requiring Boeing, General Motors, etc to transfer technology and methodologies in order to do business in China. They will move from the 70s to 00s in years rather than decades.

  27. I know you're just being smug by Chicken_Kickers · · Score: 1

    I know you're just being smug but remember, you might as well paint Nazi swastikas on all of your rockets since that is where you got most of your rocket tech. And considering the Chinese invented fricking rockets in the first place, you have no basis on being smug at all.

    1. Re:I know you're just being smug by Orffen · · Score: 1

      I'm no rocket scientist, but I'm pretty sure that while current rockets were based on Nazi rockets, they're not even comparable anymore. Original research based upon older research was done to come where we are today.

      It'd be a bit like saying all antibiotics should be stamped with the Scottish flag.

      I don't recall any solid rocket space launches in Chinese mythology/ancient history either. </smug>

    2. Re:I know you're just being smug by wzzzzrd · · Score: 1

      I'm no rocket scientist, but I'm pretty sure that while current rockets were based on Nazi rockets, they're not even comparable anymore. Original research based upon older research was done to come where we are today.

      The last real super heavy lift launch system was the Saturn 5. The Saturn 5 project was directed by Wernherr v. Braun and Arthur Rudolph. Not much has changed since. Hell, even the calculations made by this guy, while a century old, still apply and are used today.

      --
      On second thought, let's not go to Camelot. It is a silly place.
  28. "exploration at L2" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The probe is expected to perform exploration at L2"??

    I'm picking up a lot of.... well... space... around here. Continuing exploration...

  29. Gundam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enter the Human Reform League

  30. Lagrangian point L2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "L" in this statement, is redundant, the "L" is unnecessary.

  31. Come on, US, by arisvega · · Score: 1

    .. hurry up and build something!

    --
    The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
  32. thanks for replying. by sittingQuietly · · Score: 0

    you helped me. Seriously.