Slashdot Mirror


Why Groupon Not As Rosy As It Appears

Rambo Tribble writes "CNN is running an article detailing the dubious history of Eric Lefkofsky, Groupon's chairman and largest shareholder. It would seem Mr. Lefkofsky has an extensive history of taking investors' money for himself, then bankrupting the businesses invested in." Another article posted today at TechCrunch explores one businesswoman's story of how working with Groupon was the single worst business decision she ever made.

190 comments

  1. Funny... by joaommp · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... as I read this article with a "groupon" ad on the side...

    1. Re:Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the only thing funny about it is that you still see adds. 1995 called.

    2. Re:Funny... by joaommp · · Score: 1

      I didn't used to need any type of ad blocker since I had that little checkbox available on slashdot to disable ads because of my contributions. it's gone. and slashdot is the only thing I use a browser for, anyway.

    3. Re:Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is more on the internet than just slashdot.org. Just saying...

    4. Re:Funny... by joaommp · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's possible, I'll take your word for it, but with so much new, interesting, relevant and non-duplicate stuff on slashdot everyday, I never get the chance to visit other websites...

    5. Re:Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      'I didn't used to need any type of ad blocker...' ...nor spellchecker....

    6. Re:Funny... by joaommp · · Score: 1

      If you'd like to measure Portuguese writing skills with me, be free to do so. Until then, don't mess with me because of a stupid typo.

    7. Re:Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1995 internet had ads? You must be new here.

      And I don't see any "adds" either. You must be born in 1995.

    8. Re:Funny... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

      Heh.

      I don't think I have the gene to see ads. Blacked out of my consciousness like crying kids on a cross-country flight.

      Oddly, I tend to avoid buying anything with a label, and remove the ones I do notice. Maybe I have an anti-ad gene?

      If you took off the labels can you still name the brand? if so, why label? If not, why pay a premium?

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    9. Re:Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When are you going to get a job and give me my money back, you tuna-munching twat?

      Signed,
          A German

    10. Re:Funny... by TheABomb · · Score: 1

      Put on the glasses!

      --
      MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
    11. Re:Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not for a very long time. So pass me my fishing rod I want to look busy.

      Lots o love

      Portugal

    12. Re:Funny... by Antonovich · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure /. gets anything just for impressions (rather than clicks) but the ads don't really bother me, and as I don't donate and spend lots of time here, I haven't disabled them. My way of saying thanks...

    13. Re:Funny... by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Actually I think what it is , is that people are beginning to get over stimulated with ads, and now are beginning to ignore them more and more. Ads serve no purpose for our daily lives, and continuously push us to do things we don't want so we are beginning to just ignore them in mass.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    14. Re:Funny... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 2

      So obviously you never RTFA..... :)

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    15. Re:Funny... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 2

      What's spelled incorrectly there? I don't see it. I don't even see any grammar atrocities.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    16. Re:Funny... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 2

      AC is a douche. There's nothing wrong with your spelling.

      Only thing wrong with your post is lack of capitalization on the last two sentences, and starting the last one with "and".
      But since that's not what AC quoted, I'm assuming they didn't even notice that, because they were too busy thinking you spelled "ad" without the second "d". :-/

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    17. Re:Funny... by j-beda · · Score: 1

      Or I'll throw you into the garbage cans again!

      https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/They_Live

    18. Re:Funny... by wygit · · Score: 1

      Did you warn them about 9/11, Katrina, The Sumatra, China, Pakistan, Haiti & Japan earthquakes, and all the other disasters they could prepare for?
      YOU DIDN'T?!?
      WHY NOT!!!

    19. Re:Funny... by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      that little checkbox available on slashdot to disable ads because of my contributions. it's gone.

      Sounds like you haven't been doing enough karma whoring lately.

    20. Re:Funny... by PwnzerDragoon · · Score: 1

      Thanks to NoScript (well, NotScripts for me on Chrome) you don't even need an ad blocker. I don't mind ads, they pay for what I'm reading. But every ad service around seems to feel the need to insert them on the client side, which means allowing them to run their scripts in my browser. Which is not happening. If you can't handle them server-side, I'm not going to see them.

      Oh, and if they're being blocked because the ad is a flash animation, you can just bite my shiny metal ass.

    21. Re:Funny... by tyrione · · Score: 1

      Heh. I don't think I have the gene to see ads. Blacked out of my consciousness like crying kids on a cross-country flight. Oddly, I tend to avoid buying anything with a label, and remove the ones I do notice. Maybe I have an anti-ad gene? If you took off the labels can you still name the brand? if so, why label? If not, why pay a premium?

      fnjord!

  2. Thanks capitalism . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey, that's the world we live in. Suck it up.

    1. Re:Thanks capitalism . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or tear it down.

    2. Re:Thanks capitalism . . . by HangingChad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      hey, that's the world we live in. Suck it up.

      We can do better.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    3. Re:Thanks capitalism . . . by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 2

      hey, that's the world we live in. Suck it up.

      We can do better.

      But we don't.

    4. Re:Thanks capitalism . . . by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      No, that causes numerous other problems.

      This is caused by the separation of investment, ownership, and accountability. A CEO (etc) shouldn't be able to ruin someone else's investment and make out like a bandit.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  3. Toolbars & Viruses by jimmerz28 · · Score: 2

    Damn I was hoping this was going to be about how coupon sites attract women to install toolbars and download viruses.

    I already assumed large consumer-whore businesses had crooked chairmen...

    1. Re:Toolbars & Viruses by Rendrago · · Score: 1

      Or how the Internet Pyramid Schemes for Youths lobby is doing.

    2. Re:Toolbars & Viruses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude check out my lockerz..

    3. Re:Toolbars & Viruses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn straight. Groupon investors are just doofuses who don't know how lucky they were for missing out on valinux.

    4. Re:Toolbars & Viruses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Write that again, but in a Rowan Atkinson voice.

    5. Re:Toolbars & Viruses by slackbheep · · Score: 1

      And you, fearful of retaliation and being held accountable for what you chose to say elected to say as much as an AC. Welcome to Slashdot, please take a sock puppet and continue on your way.

  4. Irony of Groupon by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

    The 2011 tech bubble could very well help Groupon raise money.

    But remember the last tech bubble? During the dotcom days nobody would have bothered saving $10 at a restaurant. If this current bubble has any staying power, it could put Groupon out of business.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Irony of Groupon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      During the dotcom days nobody would have bothered saving $10 at a restaurant.

      Have you seen the economy lately?

      This isn't the dotcom era.

    2. Re:Irony of Groupon by timeOday · · Score: 1

      The 2011 tech bubble could very well help Groupon raise money.

      What 2011 tech bubble? The Nasdaq is down overall this year.

    3. Re:Irony of Groupon by Dahamma · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wouldn't worry too much about consumers throughout the US not caring about saving (the current "bubble" is NOT in a general boom economy like last time!) What I'd worry about is the companies offering the deals realizing that selling hundreds of discounts that after a 1/2 off rebate and Groupon's cut give them about 30% of their normal revenue. That's a pretty steep discount for a bit of advertising, and I can't see Groupon continuing to find that many suckers, er businesses at that margin...

    4. Re:Irony of Groupon by j-beda · · Score: 2

      That's a pretty steep discount for a bit of advertising, and I can't see Groupon continuing to find that many suckers, er businesses at that margin...

      In comparison however, running a regular advertising campaign can cost many thousands of bucks is straight cash payments - so potentially using that budgeted money for this type of offer might make sense. For a service oriented businesses the increased traffic could make up for the decreased margin. For example if your hair stylists are sitting around with empty chairs, putting a person into one at any price is a net gain since your overhead is a constant.

      It does seem however that these types of offers are not very good at creating repeat business without the the discount, so traditional advertisement might be more useful.

    5. Re:Irony of Groupon by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      For a service oriented businesses the increased traffic could make up for the decreased margin.

      I read a story a few weeks ago about a British portrait photographer who miscalculated (again on bad advice from a Groupon sales rep) and ended up owing people about 4 months worth of portraits and prints at such a huge discount she'd be making about $3 an hour for the first 1/3 of the year.

      Even with several employees helping, it can be a problem - if a hair salon sold enough coupons to fill the chairs for no revenue, they will need to schedule more employees to work to meet the demand, rather than only paying those needed for regular paying customer traffic; also (as in the story referenced in the summary) if too many non-paying deal seekers show up, it may actually drive away the regulars. Same thing with a restaurant - employee payroll is a major cost, so they try to carefully schedule just enough cooks, waiters, etc to serve expected customers.

      I do think there are limited circumstances where a Groupon-type deal would actually benefit a business - I guess the real problem is Groupon reps don't just target those businesses, they seem to target a lot of struggling small businesses desperate or naive enough to consider making such a bad business decision. I wouldn't be surprised if lawsuits start popping up related to this...

      [and semi-OT, speaking of lawsuits - this is a fascinating article on the Groupon chairman's sketchy past and lawsuit trouble... http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/06/10/groupon-eric-lefkofsky/ ]

    6. Re:Irony of Groupon by j-beda · · Score: 1

      For a service oriented businesses the increased traffic could make up for the decreased margin.

      I read a story a few weeks ago about a British portrait photographer who miscalculated (again on bad advice from a Groupon sales rep) and ended up owing people about 4 months worth of portraits and prints at such a huge discount she'd be making about $3 an hour for the first 1/3 of the year.

      As I recall, that was a third party wondering how the photographer could make money off of it - not the actual photographer complaining. Some might argue that $3/hour is better than zero if they were not able to fill their schedule on their own. In terms of photography, I have received numerous offers for *free* sittings, even more of a loss leader than the steep Groupon discounts. They can make their money on the up-sell - bigger prints, more copies, extra poses, etc.

      But of course, you are correct that the real problem is the business owner not knowing what they are getting into, and not limiting the negative impact by way of limited numbers and/or tighter control over the timing of the coupons. Having sales reps work to make sure the program is advantageous to both the consumer and the business would seem to be worthwhile - hopefully Groupon's reps will wise up and change their approach before they completely ruin the very businesses they are trying to profit from.

  5. "Single worst decision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I got this far in that story before I facepalmed and stopped reading:

    Tracking and infrastructure was a really difficult problem. At the time, she didn’t have a computer, so she was reliant on a binder with 900 names in it. It was an inefficient way to track the deal. This also resulted in a lot of fraud as people redeemed coupons multiple times.

    1. Re:"Single worst decision" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yea, it was hard to feel too sorry for the lady in the story. It doesn't even really sound like Groupon tried to confuse her, they just weren't very helpful. If she didn't understand the agreement, she shouldn't have signed it, and if you're a business owner and don't understand that simple concept then it's just a matter of time before you get screwed. However, I do think that Groupon is a shitty investment and a company with a lot of hype and very little future.

    2. Re:"Single worst decision" by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2

      This is what doesn't add up.

      "At the time, she didnâ(TM)t have a computer"

      Her online presence, including a blog, Facebook and Twitter is well above average for a local business.

      Who has those presences and can't get a $10 total laughingstock computer to run a text file to search the coupon numbers?

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    3. Re:"Single worst decision" by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Informative

      What they meant was, "at the time, she didn't have a computer[ized cash register]". (Or "computer in the coffee shop," at least.)Lots of small businesses don't have that.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:"Single worst decision" by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Her online presence, including a blog, Facebook and Twitter is well above average for a local business.

      Who has those presences and can't get a $10 total laughingstock computer to run a text file to search the coupon numbers?

      Somebody who gets someone else do do all that kind of shit for them?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:"Single worst decision" by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      A $250 netbook would have solved that, or just crossing off the names as the coupons were redeemed.

  6. So what is the point here? by fermat1313 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems that the point of this story is you shouldn't get into marketing plans if you don't know what you're doing. She didn't have a computer, she doesn't understand how statistics works, she didn't know what to do with expired coupons (nicely say "no" and offer some other type of discount to make them feel like they are still getting,) she admittedly didn't do anything to convert Groupon customers to regular customers.

    The world is full of companies have failed because they didn't understand the market. It's not the fault of Groupon that she allowed herself to be talked into something that she clearly didn't understand. We're all adults here.

    1. Re:So what is the point here? by moderatorrater · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, she made almost every mistake she could (including offering a groupon worth 8x what a normal customer paid), and then they make it sound like groupon is terrible. Yes, offering a large discount and sharing 50% of the revenue on top of that has huge potential to lose you money. If you mishandle it, perhaps you should look at yourself first.

    2. Re:So what is the point here? by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think she deserves some blame, but I've heard many other groupon merchants complain of the same problems. The douchebag salespitch where groupon tries to keep 100% of the revenue is new, though.

      Why doesn't groupon offer advice on what to expect, how to manage the sudden influx of customers, how to convert them to regulars, how to deal with expired coupons, etc? Ultimately it's in their best interest for the merchant to be successful.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:So what is the point here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sales reps can be intuitively helpful. And sales reps can be intentionally damaging.

    4. Re:So what is the point here? by Americium · · Score: 2

      I don't understand the problem, it seemed like a huge success, lots of people purchased her groupon and came. If you offer a coupon that results in you making a loss, that's insane. That's like taking out ads, knowing that even if people see the ads and purchase your product, you'll still lose money because the ads cost so much.

    5. Re:So what is the point here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ultimately it's in their long term best interest for the merchant to be successful.

      Fixed that for ya.

      If they don't care about the long term, then it's cheaper to screw over their clients... and sales douchebags only care about their commissions, never the long term.

    6. Re:So what is the point here? by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      Sorry to be nit picky, but ultimately mean in the end or eventually (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ultimately), so all you did was add redundancy to his statement.

    7. Re:So what is the point here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Social coupons like Groupon are businesses that feed off of other businesses. If you are lucky, you can make the relationship symbiotic instead of parasitic.

      We negotiated a groupon a little over a year ago. Our classes usually sell for $150 a month. When I talked to the groupon rep, they initially wanted me to offer a 50% deal ($75 gross revenue), and then give them %50 of the gross ($37.50), with no upper limit on the number sold and a year to redeem. I got a fair amount of pressure to sign the deal that day. I told him I needed a few days to run numbers on it.

      Long story short, when I ran my numbers I figured out that if I spend 2 months worth of our advertising budget on this, limit it to 200 groupons and restrict it to new customers only, keep classes at 60-100% capacity, then I need to take in $65.08 per student for the month to break even, and then I would have 200 new people that have tried my classes. Even if we only keep 10% of these students, we would come out in a much better position.

      I said no to Groupon's initial offer, and sent a counter proposal - a %50 deal for $75. We keep $65, groupon gets $10 per groupon, minimum of 50, max of 200. We also added some additional conditions:
      - 1 per person plus 1 as a gift
      - Groupon students must pre-register for a class (they can't just show up)
      - Groupon students will be admitted on a space available basis
      - Groupon would only be valid for a specific 3 month period, to coincide with our slow season and the start of a semester.
      - Our standard class cancellation policy would be in effect (class canceled if fewer than X students sign up for it). Rainchecks would be offered to students canceled on under this policy - essentially we extend the expiration date for these specific folks
      - We would add a number of beginner classes to our schedule for the 3 months after the groupon.
      - Groupon not valid for product purchases.

      They accepted the deal, and we sign the contract.

      Then I get a call from a supervisor, who wants me to change back to the %50 @ 50% deal, with no upper limit. I said no.

      Our groupon never ran - despite having a signed contract.

      Living Social did run the deal, and we did very well with it. We sold 133. Of that, 86 were used within the time frame (15 people tried to use them outside of the time frame, which we said no to. 3 more were used outside of the time frame, but that's another story having to do with a pair of social workers, 3 foster kids and Christmas). We converted 33 into additional sales, with 18 of those converting into long-term students, most of whom take several classes with us.

      Will I do it again? Yes, I think I will.

    8. Re:So what is the point here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It clearly states in the article that her average customer spends $5 a visit. The Groupon was for $13. Your assertion that she was, "offering a groupon worth 8x what a normal customer paid" is full of shit.

    9. Re:So what is the point here? by meta-monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But there's pretty much no such thing as a groupon that doesn't result in a huge loss for the company. Groupon generally won't sponsor your ad unless you offer a really huge deal, like 50% off. Something like "spend $50 and get a $100 gift card." And then they take half the money, so now you're providing $100 worth of service and only getting $25. What kind of business has that kind of profit margin where they can give hundreds or thousands of customers a 75% discount and still be profitable?

      Groupons are fantastic deals for consumers, and terrible deals for businesses. As more businesses realize this, Groupon will eventually crumble.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    10. Re:So what is the point here? by rudy_wayne · · Score: 2

      What kind of business has that kind of profit margin where they can give hundreds or thousands of customers a 75% discount and still be profitable?

      The kind that are always advertising 75% off sales?

    11. Re:So what is the point here? by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      Those sales are 75% off the crap that they couldn't sell at 0-50% off.

    12. Re:So what is the point here? by Machtyn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Perhaps. I have a friend who runs a massage business. At the time her sale finished on Groupon for our area, she had amassed the most number of sales of anybody. The only reason she didn't have the highest margin is because there was an optometrist that had a higher price and sales even after the 50+% discount. She was booked up for months and, in her line of business, it is easy to have repeat customers (do a good job with the massage) and offer fair prices after.

      I tried to advertise my computer repair shop, but they refused me saying they didn't see how there would be a mutual benefit. It was a cop-out, I think they just didn't want to deal with it (have any of you seen any tech related or repair related deals go up?) or they felt that my desire to have a limited number of coupons was not beneficial - they're probably correct.

      In any case, I knew what I was getting in to. But all I was losing was my time - no resources or capital (no employees). But I can easily see how this may be a serious detriment to a normal small business.

    13. Re:So what is the point here? by Mitreya · · Score: 1
      she didn't know what to do with expired coupons

      I have talked to someone who ran a groupon promotion and she seemed to know how to handle expired coupons quite well. Ingenious, really. A groupon bought for $X and worth $2X of services reverts to the original paid value of $X after it expires. Seemed like a perfectly fair solution to me.

    14. Re:So what is the point here? by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Yeah those are called "going out of business" sales.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    15. Re:So what is the point here? by Machtyn · · Score: 2

      Ahh, it's too bad you didn't sign your name to the post. It is very insightful. I tried to run with Groupon after a friend had very positive results (at least with initial sales - she had more sales than any Groupon sale before hers in our area), but I'm not sure what the aftermath of it was. I'll see her soon and ask.

      I tried to advertise my computer repair shop, but they refused me saying they didn't see how there would be a mutual benefit. It was a cop-out, I think they just didn't want to deal with it or they felt that my desire to have a maximum number of coupons was not beneficial - they're probably correct. In any case, I knew what I was getting in to. But all I was losing was my time - no resources or capital (no employees). But I can easily see how this may be a serious detriment to a normal small business. I've used Groupon as a customer a few times. In one case, I will be a repeat customer... but I don't often need a nice picture frame. The other one is a one time fix for service - a service I will likely not ever need again (and definitely not at the normal price).

    16. Re:So what is the point here? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      A groupon bought for $X and worth $2X of services reverts to the original paid value of $X after it expires. Seemed like a perfectly fair solution to me.

      Really? Because if Groupon took half of $X, you're getting $X/2, and if you'd let them have it at the original $2X, you'd be earning $X/4. Unless your markup is obscene, and you sell a boatload and generate repeat business, I don't see how vendors make any money at this.

      Reading the article, I can see why certain business just aren't suited to this. In the case of the pizza shop, that might have gotten more people to try them ... but reading the article, it sounds like you generally give stuff away, and split the revenue with Groupon.

      I remember seeing a story (possibly even on Slashdot) about some photographer in the UK who had more or less signed up to do an impossible amount of work for next to nothing ... it worked out to be almost a year of professional time or something obscene.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    17. Re:So what is the point here? by MarkvW · · Score: 2

      If you're looking at it like a priest, then I agree with you.
      If you're looking at it like a potential investor, then Groupon looks like it is gouging the very customers that it needs to sustain its business.

    18. Re:So what is the point here? by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      If you have a contract, I'd sue them.

      --
      This space available.
    19. Re:So what is the point here? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      For what? The damages are going to be too small to pay lawyer's fees.

    20. Re:So what is the point here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Groupon didn't give her any control over when the deal would be offered, so they ended up offering it when the small shop was already overrun with business. They offered it to an overly-large geographical area, leading people to drive a long distance only to have to wait in a long line just to get a cup of coffee. Being so busy, the service wasn't so good, causing people who had driven ridiculous distances for a cup of coffee to be abusive to the staff, not tip, and leave bad reviews on the web.

      Meanwhile, Groupon had assured her that most of their users spend more than the value of the coupon, but without indicating that it's only a few cents more than the value.

      The reason to offer something like Groupon is not to make money (I'm sure that's extremely rare), but to build up a base of repeat customers. However, people frequent their neighborhood coffee shop, not one 10 miles away! The fact that Groupon sent them mostly customers from outside her market area made it a massively losing proposition.

      dom

    21. Re:So what is the point here? by Surt · · Score: 1

      Even the punitive damages?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    22. Re:So what is the point here? by demonlapin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Generally limited to 3x actual damages, IIRC (though IANAL). If the business had to pay up front for the advertising, they'd have a stronger claim, but since it's no cost to the business until the Groupon runs... I wouldn't count on winning much. Maybe if you just wanted satisfaction in small-claims court you could get it, but even that's probably not worth it.

    23. Re:So what is the point here? by cas2000 · · Score: 1

      you must be an american. only yanks think that caveat emptor is an admirable business strategy rather than a warning against scumbags.

    24. Re:So what is the point here? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      The world is full of companies have failed because they didn't understand the market. It's not the fault of Groupon that she allowed herself to be talked into something that she clearly didn't understand. We're all adults here.

      I realize it's naive but I expect most small business owners would defer to Groupon's judgement and experience of the market when they were entering a deal. The biggest red flag in the story was how the salesrep said the business could only have one promotion ever. That's not a company interested in building a relationship, that's a company only interested in taking the money and running. The funny part is if they fuck over enough businesses like this then word will get around and their profits will head south very quickly. A $30 billion valuation sounds absurdly inflated to me and I would be surprised if they were worth anything close to that in a few years.

    25. Re:So what is the point here? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      What kind of business has that kind of profit margin where they can give hundreds or thousands of customers a 75% discount and still be profitable?

      The kind that are always advertising 75% off sales?

      75% off sales are not the norm. They're to get rid of stock where the alternative is a 100% loss of profit when the item spoils, goes out of fashion or otherwise becomes unsellable at any price.

    26. Re:So what is the point here? by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      I always just assumed businesses would do something like that and put it under their marketing budget. If you are a competent business owner you should be able to use Groupon(esque) deals to generate a lot of new business. If people like your products, a lot will come back.

    27. Re:So what is the point here? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      The kind that are always advertising 75% off sales?

      Yeah those are called "going out of business" sales.

      Not necessarily. There was a business in the UK called "The Officers Club" that sold all their clothes at comparable "discounts" for years. It was obvious that the "original" prices were way above what anyone would have paid (obscure/imitation brands being quoted at designer-brand prices) and equally obvious that the "discounts" were just a sales technique integral to the business model.

      Apparently the Office of Fair Trading eventually cracked down on this a few years before they went bankrupt.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    28. Re:So what is the point here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another article posted today at TechCrunch explores one businesswoman's story of how working with Groupon was the single worst business decision she ever made.

      Everyone is happy to bash this lady as 'stupid', but this is a reoccurring theme. Groupon's business model is, "take a raping now, it'll pay off in the long run". What people have been realizing for the last couple years is that it never works out that way.

      You have to clear your deal with Groupon marketing. That means you have to make very little (or nothing) on your deal to begin with. Then they take 50% of that. The trade-off is supposed to be that customers will convert to regulars... except that #'s consistently show that Groupon customers are deal hunters, and very unlikely to become repeat customers anywhere.

      Groupon profits. Deal hunters get a deal. The businesses take a bath. Groupon's model is unsustainable, with Amazon, Google, Facebook and LivingSocial all coming on like gangbusters, and businesses refusing to do business with Groupon. Their little bubble is going to burst, even if the the whole tech one doesn't.

    29. Re:So what is the point here? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Edit; sorry, just realised that you meant those *bogus* "going out of business sales" that some companies repeatedly engage in as a part of their business model.

      We had a chain here called "Bargain Books" that did something similar, constantly advertising as "CLOSING DOWN SALE" with "for refit" in smaller letters below (presumably because simply saying "closing down" all the time when they weren't would eventually have got them into trouble, at least in the UK. Then again, as there were never any signs of a notable "refit", they'd probably have still got slammed under that if the authorities had really wanted to push in that direction.)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    30. Re:So what is the point here? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      the point is that if you burn cash for cold callers, giving deal incentives to merchants and on spamming the internet(by giving _ridiculous_ referral bonuses) then you _can_ build a significant user base rather quickly. but just having that doesn't make things profitable. so the real "how" groupon was profitable for it's founders was that they took investor money and burnt a lot of it stupidly and took a significant portion to the founders.

      they also have a big list of non-functioning emails etc etc, due to the way their local sites are built(you have to give them some email to just see if there's any deals there worth buying! with a super fucking annoying pop-lay-over. also a lot of the registered users are what you could call shadow users, as their referral bonuses have been quite ridiculous(like 7e, and 100+ for the signee.. you would usually see that kind of referral bonuses only in high yield investment scams).

      also their merchant sales staff doesn't seem to have given much consideration to keeping everything in the chain profitable and reasonable(what good is a cheap service if you can't use it due to being unable to reserve a time because they made the offer too good and sold way too many coupons? it's shit for the customer and it's shit for the service provider, only one it isn't shit for is groupon and even for them it's shit in the long run _but_ they could use that sales data as something to peg the company value on).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    31. Re:So what is the point here? by Galvatron · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, while I'm not a lawyer, I am a law student (though this is not legal advice, retain your own counsel, etc.), and it's actually even less than that. Under most circumstances, contract violations provide for damages ONLY. I believe the 3x damages bit you're remembering is for RICO violations, which I doubt would apply here (however, I haven't studied RICO, so I honestly don't know). Had the guy been unable to find anyone else willing to run the same deal, he'd have an argument for expectation damages (damages for not receiving the benefit he expected from the ad), but since he ended up getting the same deal from someone else, there were no real damages.

      This sounds shocking to a lot of people, I know, but the courts generally view contract violation as a value-neutral situation. Courts refuse to "punish" breachers, their only interest is in making the other party whole (and even then, only if the party has done everything they can to mitigate their own harm). Again, in this case he was able to go to someone else and get the same deal, so the only conceivable harm is the trivial amount of time and effort to approach a competitor and ask them for the same deal. The courts are not your daddy, here, where you run to them crying "but he promised!" You're expected to be an adult, do your best to solve the problem yourself, and turn to the courts only to resolve any real material harm you suffer from the contract breach.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    32. Re:So what is the point here? by Duradin · · Score: 1

      Our mindless devotion to "FREEEEDOMMMMMMMM!" while giving little effort to reason, as the Founding Fathers clearly wanted, is why it's the American Way.

    33. Re:So what is the point here? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      The article starts with pointing out this business owner has no computer.

      A bit further down it seems this same business owner is running a blog, advertising on facebook, and using twitter to promote the business. Also it appears she has been communicating with the Groupon sales by e-mail.

      This just doesn't add up.

      The point that she bought something without really understanding what she bought, I won't contest. That's the core of the problem here for this business owner.

    34. Re:So what is the point here? by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      Has anyone ever bought a full price sofa from DFS who used to be Northern Upholstery?

      Their commercials are pretty much the same as you describe ... All year round they're having a 50-75% off sale, and this is absolutely, positively the last chance to get these sofas and chairs at the bargain prices.

      It's a point that a lot of comedians have used to get a laugh in the area.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    35. Re:So what is the point here? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      That's kind of what I thought. Thanks for the more-professional info.

    36. Re:So what is the point here? by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Yes I agree with that. In the end, the service offered by groupon is "worth" maybe five or ten percent of actual coupon-based sales, not fifty percent of all coupons sold. I'm sure it will survive, but not with anything close to the current parameters.

    37. Re:So what is the point here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certianly, Groupon isn't to blame for her choices. But, this is a common experience for small businesses. There is a lot of negative business feedback about Groupon, meaning their long term outlook for growth isn't as strong. Their business model is currently unprofitable because they have structured everything to be gambling on long term growth.

      Would you like to invest knowing how poor their business to business relationship are, and knowing that they can't succeed without it?

    38. Re:So what is the point here? by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Most people in America think of lawsuits as a net positive action rather than a net neutral action. If we went back to the cultural idea of "courts are used to bring you back to where you were"... you know, what they're properly used for... then we might have better understandings in the public of the purpose of courts.

      But then, there still always remains the damages for things like discrimination and such like that... how do you rate "damages" in this case to bring them back to neutral. I suppose if people were more willing to settle (both sides, not just the business (usually) trying to avoid any liability, but the people who were harmed) then we'd have a more amicable legal system... but then the whole adversarial model and the general dickheadedness of some people to avoid any and all punishment make any such ideas a total pipe dream.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    39. Re:So what is the point here? by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      For what? The damages are going to be too small to pay lawyer's fees.

      They would sue for "specific performance". Namely, get a court order telling Groupon to run the ad, or be in contempt of court.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    40. Re:So what is the point here? by raehl · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's a sales guy motivated to make a sale.

      You know what they call believing the sales guy?

      Stupid.

    41. Re:So what is the point here? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's a sales guy motivated to make a sale.

      You know what they call believing the sales guy?

      Stupid.

      I'm sure many burnt businesses would agree with you. Sadly Groupon and the fools who buy into it are the ones who'll ultimately suffer. If you brazenly fleece your customers they'll stop doing business with you.

    42. Re:So what is the point here? by Alomex · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter whose fault it is. If Groupon sales model consists of screwing the customer, then they won't last long. Simple as that. Most other merchants report similar horror stories.

    43. Re:So what is the point here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Record companies

    44. Re:So what is the point here? by Cable · · Score: 1

      Yes and people who don't know how computers work tend to use them anyway. If not then the virus writers, scammers, adware spyware writers will go out of business.

      Also Apple would be out of business and there would be no Groupon or Facebook. We'd still have BBS tech and text based services. Unix would rule and MS Windows would not.

      Fact is people work for companies even if they don't know how they work. That Dilbert PHB syndrome for example. :)

    45. Re:So what is the point here? by xandroid · · Score: 1

      Wow. Mod parent "Should have been the summary".

      --
      $ echo "ceci n'est pas une pipe" | sed -Ee 's/(eci n|pas )//g'
  7. um duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Take a look at how Groupon works. It cannot possibly be truly beneficial to any business. For every "groupon" purchased for a business, the business takes a loss and the people looking for a deal rarely come back. So you're paying a lot for "advertising" that you'll never possibly see a return on investment from because you're never going to get new, repeat, life-long customers from it.

    It's a shame and a scam. I pity the businesses that use Groupon, LivingSocial, and the ilk, they'll never survive the long haul.

    1. Re:um duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the point is to attract customer to build a customer base, but on the other hand you only get people looking for a great deal. Oh well.

    2. Re:um duh by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      So, it's just like every other form of advertising?

      Coupons lower the barrier to entry for trying new things. If you have a really good product, but relatively few people know about it, offering a good deal is a reasonable way to get exposure. The coupon reduces the risk to the customer, because they don't lose as much if the product is bad. No, the business won't profit much from the initial coupon run, but it shows people that their product is worth the higher normal price. Ideally, at least.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    3. Re:um duh by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      You could say that about any sale. And yet, successful businesses run sales all the time. They pay out for advertisements that are unlikely to directly recoup their costs, and they promote loss leaders that lose them money every time they're bought. The objective isn't to make lots of money in the short term, it's to increase the long-term prospects of the business.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    4. Re:um duh by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      From the article, it sounded really bad, this person had a rough time of it. She lost $10,000 in the deal. But as the article also mentions, the pizza parlor across the street had much better results, and decided to do it again.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:um duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The theory is the same as a loss-leader. Heavy below-cost discounting works only when the marginal cost of providing it to an addtional person isn't that much and there is some kind of hook that encourages a repeat.

      For example, a groupon-like site here had swing dancing classes; something like 10 classes for a beginner at 50% or less of the normal price. The catch is that this exposes them further; gets people in the door. The marginal cost of the extras in a class that's happening anyway isn't all *that* much (it's roughly speaking, nothing), given that most of the cost is locked in once they decide to run a class. (Critically, there's very little to no opportunity cost; having extras in a class usually does not displace other, full-paying, customers assuming the facility is large enough). And, of course, the business is hoping you'll get hooked on it and want to continue classes (but, you'll want to do classes more advanced than the basic intro, of course.)

      HOWEVER, if your business doesn't have easy conversion from one-off to repeat customers, and the freeloaders impose a significant cost, then yes, you'll have issues.

    6. Re:um duh by RussR42 · · Score: 1

      If you have a really good product, I would think that part of that is that it is already offering a good deal. Perhaps you could reduce the risk to the consumer by standing behind your product instead of offering a coupon....

    7. Re:um duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this hard? I work at a niche sport center which generates most of its leads through word of mouth, and is mostly group classes (with private lessons available). Our programs are dialed in, and I don't care if I have 10 or 30 in a recreational or youth setting; I can always recruit a high-level athlete as an "assistant coach".

      In this case, there's no overhead to each sale, and I'm just increasing the number of people who see my sport as a viable activity. Granted, retention is hell, because plenty will try it once and then decide it's not their thing, they bought the coupon in a pique of "Oh, that's neat!" But I'd pay to get in front of that many eyeballs - the fact that LivingSocial cut me a check for a few grand is gravy!

      Some of us are doing quite well - no need to pity us.

    8. Re:um duh by qubezz · · Score: 2

      What I don't get is the success that Groupon has had in getting their name out there. Maybe they have a cute buzzy name. A similar scamlike operation is already being run by restaurant.com: they have pushy salesmen come in to small businesses and sign them up for marketing services (for 'free'). People go to the restaurant.com site and pay half-price for gift certificates to restaurants. restaurant.com keeps all the money. Small businesses are forced to feed people for free and will have a hard time getting themselves off the site even after multiple attempts.

      It sounds like Groupon is doing it better by having their pushy salesmen charge businesses for giving something away for free... this might be fine in a service industry like massage, where you are trying to charge $80 an hour for a skill worth about $8 in the open labor market, but if you are selling any goods you'd better steer clear of these offer sites!

    9. Re:um duh by v1 · · Score: 1

      I think the point is to attract customer to build a customer base, but on the other hand you only get people looking for a great deal. Oh well.

      I was thinking about that and realized that's a risk for any sale, be it a coupon or basic no-coupon-required sale. You are going to get people coming in only because things are on sale, that have no intention of returning to your store until there's another sale. You're also going to offer sale prices to people that were there not even expecting a deal. (losing money on them)

      That's just an inherent risk of running a sale. You throw money into advertising and money into the sale discount, in exchange for attracting new repeat customers. Every sale is going to attract these 'deadbeat coupon users'. It's just a question of what percentage you convert into return normal-price customers, and how much the sale initially costs you. You've got to run the numbers carefully to determine where the break-even point is going to be, (if it even exists) and how long you will have to wait for it.

      Blindly relying on your advertiser to provide you with useful and accurate information here is completely stupid. Advertisers are not in the business of making you money, they're in the business of making them money. There are going to be some established more honest and upfront advertisers that will try to build a mutually beneficial business relationship and retain you as a customer, and there are also going to be sharks that are just going to sucker punch your business and take your cash and go hunt for another sucker. Such is the business world. You think B2C is bad? B2B is a good deal more cutthroat. Relying on a new business partner to protect your best interest is going to sting you later of not sooner.

      And obviously national advertisers are going to be a lot less interested in building a long-term partnership with you than say, someone local. They don't have a pool of a thousand local businesses to work with, they have millions of businesses all over the country. Your business is a disposable opportunity to them. It's in Groupon's best interest to hit you as hard as possible for the biggest gain possible, and then look for another sucker. If they're playing their cards right, they'll accept a more reasonable and mutually-benefitial deal if they have to, but there's more money to be made up-front by suckering you, since they don't need your return business. And you can bet their sales reps' commissions are based around that concept. (3 pts for a slam dunk, or 1 pt for a return customer)

      Summary: small business owner meets with new outside business partner, unprepared and without doing prior research, expecting them to offer mutually-benefiical terms, accepts their initial offer without careful consideration or ability to track results, and doesn't get what they expected. Does this surprise anyone?

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    10. Re:um duh by swalve · · Score: 1

      It can be a scam, but only in the hands of the small minded. Small business owners, in almost all cases that I have experienced, are cheap, venial, shortsighted greedy shits. "I paid you guys $X, how come it didn't pay back immediately???! I want my money back." Sometimes a loss-leader is just what you need to get a business going. Are you a "destination" business, where your regular customers go out of their way to come to you for your excellent/unique service? Then absolutely, you can benefit from Groupon. But if you are a sandwich joint, where your regular customers come to you because you are the nearest/best choice for lunch, you really don't need and cannot benefit from 300 facebook moms who have stapled their $3 to the "two-for-one and kids get a free balloon" coupon hording into your place on their way to free day at the zoo. Business owners who don't realize that deserve to get shafted, and Groupon might as well profit from it.

      I worked in retail for a while. In one job, fast food, I started to notice that we had a certain class of regular customer. The people who would ONLY show up when there was some kind of half price coupon in the newspaper. That's perfectly fair, but it taught me something about people. In another job, I worked for a particular bastard who seemed to enjoy making life difficult. He would LITERALLY prefer lower sales at a high margin to higher sales at a lower margin. A $10,000 day at 10% net was a disappointment, but a $2000 day at 20% net was a thrill. That was over 10 years ago, and I still get the shaky angries thinking about it.

      These are the same idiots who think that lower taxes help business owners and will create jobs. Hey fuckfaces, businesses only pay taxes on profit. If they aren't successful, they already aren't paying (income) taxes. If they ARE successful, they are already hiring the number of people they need to maximize profit. Nobody in their right mind is going to say "jeez, my tax bill just got lowered by $5000. Seems like a perfect time to spend $20k to hire some minimum wager I don't really need."

    11. Re:um duh by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could reduce the risk to the consumer by standing behind your product instead of offering a coupon....

      In this scenario, the premise is that the customer doesn't know anything about you yet. It is impossible to credibly offer them anything in terms of having a good product, "standing behind the product" or whatever, even if that's really what you offer. From a buyers' point of view, it is a totally legitimate strategy (even if it's not always the best strategy) to manage risk by simply looking at how much money comes out of their wallet, while assuming a worst-case scenario that they'll receive nothing of real value in exchange for that money.

      If you believe that potential customers are running this strategy, then coupons are a good way to work with them. And some potential customers probably are running it, even if part time.

      Here's where it gets iffy: the premise is that the customer knows nothing, but for the types of businesses that typically use half-price coupons -- RESTAURANTS!! -- looking up reviews is just as easy as buying the coupons. Once someone starts reading reviews, the premise is violated and the customer is no longer running this strategy, so selling discount coupons is probably not a winning move. If someone goes to the trouble to buy a restaurant coupon, I think they've likely already gone to the trouble to read reviews, so they've already made up their mind that they think they're going to like the food, and buying the coupons is more about merely saving money (i.e. denying you revenue) than managing risk.

      Another iffy thing is: do people use that strategy on, say, coffee shops? I don't think I have ever got a bad cup of coffee at any coffee shop. When I go to a coffee shop, I only worry about my expenses; I'm never worried about what I'm going to get for that expense. Coffee is too easy; nobody fucks it up.

      Maybe it makes sense for a limited time for absolutely new restaurants (provided the product is fuck-up-able), and I can see how it would make sense for other types of businesses, where customers aren't in the habit of researching prior to transacting.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    12. Re:um duh by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      I volunteer at a local community theatre, and we would love to have a bunch of people come see a show, even if they were only giving us 1/4th the normal amount of the money to us. (And another 1/4th to groupon.)

      We have the exact same operation expenses whether or not someone is there. High fixed costs, almost nill per-customer costs. As long as they aren't crowding out full-price paying customers, we win.

      And live theatre is something that many people don't even consider as entertainment. But get them in the door once, get a schedule in their hand, and they might come back.

      So I'm going to recommend some stuff like groupon. I don't know what exactly, but we're going to be looking at it.

      But I can see how it would be disastrous to any business with expenses, because it looks like groupon wants to have each business make only 25%, and most businesses don't have anywhere near that profit margin.

      It is entirely reasonable to produce coupons that give you negative profits in small, careful amounts, but not to people like the deal-hunters on groupon.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    13. Re:um duh by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Reviews don't have an absolutely game-changing effect on coupon use. If someone reviews a restaurant, and says their food is really good, how does that reflect my personal tastes? After volunteering in Africa, I have a very difficult time eating beans, rice, and other such things. Traditional Mexican food is awful to me, but more Americanized dishes are fine. Reviews often won't cover such details. Coupons still lower the risk, so they're still a factor in the decision process.

      As for the product being hard to screw up, the issue then becomes one of market share. If, by offering a coupon, a coffee shop can make $0.50 profit by stealing a customer from somewhere else, that's still $0.50 more than they'd make normally. Maybe their location is a little more convenient, or their service is faster, and you will abandon your normal coffee shop for theirs. If nothing else, you'd have visited them, so they're more likely to stick in your mind when you want coffee in that area. Marketing is a long-term game.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  8. Value... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly what value does Groupon add to the economy (assuming here marketing !=economic value)

    1. Re:Value... by fermat1313 · · Score: 2

      Exactly what value does Groupon add to the economy (assuming here marketing !=economic value)

      Well, your core assumption is simply crap. Marketing adds tremendous economic value. Marketing allows companies to get their product before people who otherwise wouldn't know about it. Marketing is a key driver to economic growth. If customers can't find business, business don't survive.

    2. Re:Value... by swalve · · Score: 1

      They generate sales that wouldn't otherwise have been made. Higher sales means higher gdp, faster money flow, more growth, etc.

    3. Re:Value... by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      assuming here marketing !=economic value

      It's such a silly assumption, that I don't know why anyone other than a Science Fiction author would bother with the mental exercise of answering your question about that other universe.

      Fred wants steel to make his railroad, in order to transport cargo from NY to LA. Joe has a steel mill. Alas, Fred and Joe don't know about each other, so the cargo stays in NY.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  9. Money down the drain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just yesterday I read a great article in the German Zeit about the 3 Samwer brothers who helpes Groupon take of in other places of the world and the shady ways their doing business. 500 Million debt, facebook and google chasing, then their founder said they'll be "wildly profitable", which is not allowed, they might have to reaply for an IPO.

  10. *forehead smack* by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

    Miss the point of my comment entirely, why don't you.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:*forehead smack* by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Miss the point of my comment entirely, why don't you.

      Sure, this is Slashdot. Not a problem.

      (Oh, BTW, you forgot the question mark at the end....)

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:*forehead smack* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happy to oblige; your point was non-obvious.

      The current tech "bubble" could have the staying power of irradiated soil; it's having no real effect on the economy as a whole. Furthermore, Groupon's customers are average, everyday people, not Silicon Valley chumps. They're quite happy to save $10 on meals, believe me. How, then, would 'staying power' of this purported tech 'bubble" put Groupon 'out of business'?

      Was that sarcasm? If so, I see what I missed - otherwise, watchootalkinbout, Willis?

      FWIW, I'm pretty sure Groupon's going down hard regardless. The media is having a field day, after all, pointing out their insolvency, lack of a solid business plan, scheister CEO and general ponzi scheme method of operation.

    3. Re:*forehead smack* by Goose+In+Orbit · · Score: 1

      They're quite happy to save $10 on meals, believe me.

      That does rather assume they can afford to pay for the rest of the meal as well, doesn't it?

  11. If he was looking for a quick buck... by olsmeister · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He would have taken the $6,000,000,000 that Google offered him for Groupon.

    1. Re:If he was looking for a quick buck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except if that would expose your business as the giant worthless scam it is, and make a company that thinks you owe it $6 billion chase your sorry ass around the world. ^^

      You may scam some idiots. But Google is a bit too big of a enemy.
      It's like being in the forest, meeting Rambo asking for food in exchange for money, and selling him your shit in a bag.
      BAAAD IDEA. ^^

    2. Re:If he was looking for a quick buck... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2

      Wrong. He'll make more selling to the public via the IPO vs what he would've made selling to google. Google is a more diligent purchaser than Joe six-pack and his brokerage account.

    3. Re:If he was looking for a quick buck... by artor3 · · Score: 1

      If he can keep even 1% of $6 billion, he's set for life. Why risk a sure thing? Does greed really make people that stupid?

    4. Re:If he was looking for a quick buck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      1% of 6 billion would be... 60 million. Which, as you say, is enough to be set for life.

      But... they've already walked off with... 930 million... in cash.

      http://allthingsd.com/20110602/where-did-groupons-billion-dollars-go/

    5. Re:If he was looking for a quick buck... by Raenex · · Score: 2

      But... they've already walked off with... 930 million... in cash.

      http://allthingsd.com/20110602/where-did-groupons-billion-dollars-go/

      This is why I hate the idea of investing. Hand somebody a pile of cash, and watch them use it for their own gain. Just a bunch of foxes in charge of the chicken coop.

    6. Re:If he was looking for a quick buck... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Depends. If at the moment most of the money will go to investors then it's not worth it. If there is a period where they get a percentage, then wait for the period, payout the investors, then look for the multi-billion score.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:If he was looking for a quick buck... by tibman · · Score: 1

      It's like being in the forest, meeting Rambo asking for food in exchange for money, and selling him your shit in a bag.
      Oh god, that was great.. thanks.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    8. Re:If he was looking for a quick buck... by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He would have taken the $6,000,000,000 that Google offered him for Groupon.

      Unless he knew that it wouldn't stand up to the Due Diligence. Taking the deal would have meant Google doing an in-depth inspection of the business and the books before cutting the check. I'm not saying that it's necessarily the case here, but in the go-go 90's I saw a company turn down a buyout offer that was insane. I later came to realize it was because they couldn't have stood up to the pre-closing scrutiny.

      I have no special knowledge of the Groupon situation, and the deal may well have been turned down for legitimate reasons. But that's not the only possibility.

    9. Re:If he was looking for a quick buck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read through the story, he is probably rich already. Why he is doing it if it is a scam? I have no clue, either he has something else up his sleeve, or it isnt a scam.

  12. +1 by artor3 · · Score: 1

    Came to post exactly this. You don't turn down a multi-billion dollar offer if your goal is to get rich quick. I think some people in the media just want Groupon to turn out to be a big scam, because that's a more exciting story than "tech company makes money".

    1. Re:+1 by mrvis · · Score: 1

      You might turn down 22% of 6mil if you think you can get 22% of 30mil.

      Groupon just doesn't smell right. They need a lot more people than your normal start-up. They can't scale as well.

    2. Re:+1 by mrvis · · Score: 1

      Those we supposed to be bil, not mil.

      Fuck that's a lot of money.

    3. Re:+1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But would you turn down 22% of 6bil?

    4. Re:+1 by timeOday · · Score: 1

      So which is it? Is groupon any good (for customers, as opposed to business owners)? I haven't used it yet and would like to hear what people in here think.

    5. Re:+1 by meta-monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh it's great for consumers. I use it all the time (and Living Social) to get great deals at places I either already go to or will go to once. But I own a couple of small businesses and would never in a million years sign up with these people. It is a sure-fired money loser, because you lose money on every coupon, and the kind of people who buy and redeem these things are deal hunters who will most likely not make good long-term customers.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  13. History repeats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> It would seem Mr. Lefkofsky has an extensive history of taking investors' money for himself, then bankrupting the businesses invested in."

    History repeats itself - but now he's found a good way to take money from other businesses while bankrupting them instead.

  14. Groupon Is Inconvenient For Real Customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I looked into Groupon to see what offers are available and most of the time the daily deal ads are run on business that are very inconvenient to get to, are ordinary plain restaurants or coffee shops, or some type of weird massage parlor, sky-diving/scuba lessons, etc. After a few weeks of looking into the Groupon ads I found one or two interesting places but it also turned out that I've already been there and am a regular customer or an occasional customer.

    I think that for regular people and customers Groupon is not very useful and I scratch my head thinking how does this obviously inflated dot-comesque online business valuate so much? It just makes no sense, unless of course we're now climbing out of the housing bubble and heading into the Dot-Com Bubble 2.0.

    Now, if you're one of those insane deal hunting individuals that will eat a box of chocolate covered cockroaches just because you got a 70% discount on them online along with free-shipping then by all means go right ahead to Groupon, drive across town to the next hot start-up local business, take your groupon coupons, buy only what is in the discount, argue with the people, do not pay any tip, and never return again! Enjoy, Business Stalking 2.0.

    1. Re:Groupon Is Inconvenient For Real Customers by geminidomino · · Score: 1, Funny

      Now, if you're one of those insane deal hunting individuals that will eat a box of chocolate covered cockroaches just because you got a 70% discount on them online along with free-shipping

      That seems like an awful lot of words to use when you could have just said "woman," and we all know there aren't any of those on slashdot!

    2. Re:Groupon Is Inconvenient For Real Customers by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      ...most of the time the daily deal ads are run on business that are very inconvenient to get to...

      I've used Groupon (and similar) a few times now, and I've learned to pay close attention to where the places are (and whether they require reservations, have valet parking, etc.)

      ...it also turned out that I've already been there and am a regular customer or an occasional customer...

      But isn't that where Groupon is good (for you, the customer)? You do what you'd normally do anyway, but it costs less?

      Of course, that's before I saw this article and found out how bad a deal for the business it was... I just bought a Groupon for a restaurant in my neighborhood yesterday, and now I feel bad about it.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Groupon Is Inconvenient For Real Customers by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      unless of course we're now climbing out of the housing bubble and heading into the Dot-Com Bubble 2.0.

      But this time it's different. Explain why, in 100 words or less, and you could win an internet[1]!

      [1] Subject to purchase of a regular internet at full price. Void where prohibited. Your mileage may vary.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  15. A winner in some situations by lucm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The only winning scenario for retail on Groupon is when you have excess inventory which will end up spoiled or heavily discounted anyways. In this case Groupon is awesome because not only do you make a few dollars on lousy stuff, you also take a shot at hooking a repeat customer or two. Just look at the Dell deals or at the bargain table outside your local bookstore... they've done it for years!

    Using Groupon to give away your good stuff does not make sense.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re:A winner in some situations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's another winning scenario, one that most of the stories about Groupon seem to hint about, but no one comes out and directly says: the hyper-marked-up product or service. Another poster mentioned "some type of weird massage parlor, sky-diving/scuba lessons, etc." Massage and lessons have little cost besides labor, so offering a round of free ones doesn't incur a heavy loss. Plus, lessons presuppose continuation of sales: the first one isn't worth much without the rest of the course, so offering one free is likely to make repeat customers out of people interested enough in the subject to take the first, free lesson. Those who have the surplus wealth and time for massage are also likely to become repeat customers. Others on other sites have mentioned similar procedural services that require multiple visits for full efficacy, like laser hair removal. This sort of service is likely to be drawn to Groupon, since it's a valid and useful marketing strategy for such businesses. Your local cupcake store, on the other hand, is probably running a thin profit margin, since costs of manufacture and labor are high, and thus won't be able to use Groupon sustainably.

      So here's the long-term problem: Groupon will end up (if it hasn't already) as a marketing tool for services people don't really want and inventory that's excess precisely because no one wants it; that will decrease consumer interest in Groupon's offerings. After all, if all Groupon has to offer you is laser hair removal and scuba lessons and overstocked books or Dell deals, you'll get tired of Groupon and stop looking at their marketing. Lack of relevance will kill Groupon, if mismanagement (or Ponzism) doesn't first.

    2. Re:A winner in some situations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus you really don't repeat customers who are just that cheap. This is a deal for the skinflints.

    3. Re:A winner in some situations by geekoid · · Score: 1

      naw. I use Groupon. It has gotten me to try new places. Some I go back to, and some that weren't my cup of tea.

      I am hesitant to drop 10 - 15 bucks fo lunch at some hole in the wall; especially when there are several other good lunch places I got to regularly.

      But a groupon for 10 dollar lunch for 5 dollars. I'll try it. If it's worth the normal price, it will go into me normal 'rotation' of lunch selections.

      If I do some place and it's crap I won't go back. putting out you bad stuff for new customers never works.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:A winner in some situations by lucm · · Score: 1

      > Massage and lessons have little cost besides labor, so offering a round of free ones doesn't incur a heavy loss

      I don't agree at all. Services are time-consuming, and time cannot be duplicated, there is a limited amount available.

      The real business where you don't get a heavy loss for discount is stuff like writing books or software, where the initial effort is followed by a continuous stream of revenue while you work on something else.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    5. Re:A winner in some situations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time is only wasted when there are customers waiting to use that time. If you spend all your time servicing customers, you don't need to advertise, so Groupon is worthless to you. If you're twiddling your thumbs because no one appreciates the joys and wonders of laser hair removal, then some form of advertising is going to benefit you by bringing in customers. The time you spend giving that free or steeply discounted hair-removal session or whatever other service you provide—what's its alternative? If you would otherwise be giving more profitable services in the same time, Groupon is a waste; if the alternative is sitting idle, then Groupon is not costing you anything.

      Time cannot be duplicated—that's absolutely true. There is a limited amount, as well. But that analysis doesn't take into account the supply of customers. If your time is not in demand, you're not making money. Chances are the service providers that will be advertising through Groupon are the ones that aren't comfortable with their customer base and feel that they are idling too often; service providers with adequate customers won't advertise through Groupon because they don't need to do so. The only ones who could complain about time being limited and non-duplicable are the ones who won't be using Groupon.

      The guys writing books and software won't be using Groupon either: that's why they have marketing teams or publishing houses. Groupon is for retail points of sale, not for the producers of products or content.*

      *Yes, it disgusts me to call writing books or software "content production," but thinking about business strategies isn't about making people feel good about themselves—it's usually just the opposite.

    6. Re:A winner in some situations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It has gotten me to try new places.

      Here are some lovely, descriptive verbs that you could have used instead of the non-word "gotten":

      encouraged
      enabled
      motivated
      inspired

      It is a shame that the Verb Bank doesn't offer Groupon vouchers so that you could try expanding your vocabulary.

    7. Re:A winner in some situations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also useful if you need guaranteed demand for a product before you produce it. To give you an example, a business I know of was thinking about doing a Groupon for a series of holiday-themed food items. But in order to produce them cheaply, they needed to produce large batches. A Groupon could allow them to advertise a deal before producing the product and set the threshold such that if there wasn't sufficient demand, they didn't have to follow through on production.

      Sure, the per-customer profit would have been near zero, but they wouldn't have lost money either. And they would have gotten what were, in essence, samples into the hands of customers with zero financial risk. Without Groupon or something like it, they would have had to risk people not buying enough of what the produced to break even.

  16. If it walks like a duck... by gklinger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I highly recommend reading an article titled Groupon is Effectively Insolvent in which the author draws a compelling parallel between Groupon and a Ponzi scheme.

    1. Re:If it walks like a duck... by MarkvW · · Score: 2

      Thanks for that excellent posting. It's very well thought out.

    2. Re:If it walks like a duck... by u38cg · · Score: 1
      That posting is bullshit. It is someone with enough knowledge to be dangerous, but not enough to actually know what they're talking about.

      In short, Groupon's business model and first mover advantage has given them a licence to print money, for the time being at least. Stupid arguments over how revenue is being booked are completely irrelevant. And besides, do we really think that we are so smart that we've noticed this and not one of the investors at IPO will?

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    3. Re:If it walks like a duck... by glodime · · Score: 1

      Stupid arguments over how revenue is being booked are completely irrelevant. ...do we really think that we are so smart that we've noticed this and not one of the investors at IPO will?

      You can ask AOL investors about how the way revenue is booked matters. They were recording revenues in a way the was eventually deemed fraudulent, several times in the company's history, in different ways each time, with warnings from accounting and financial regulators issued to investors well before the fraud was discovered. Each time the fraud was confirmed and revealed to the public the stock price dropped drastically.

      You might want to pick up a copy of Financial Shenanigans. The chapter on AOL's revenue reporting is assigned in the Level 2 Chartered Financial Analyst curriculum. Time Warner is feeling the brunt of the latest AOL revenue fraud now.

      So yeah, the IPO investors may all be missing something. And the people that noticed either a) got early access to the IPO with a preferential price and sold to the next sucker with a hefty same day return b) underwrote the IPO for a fee with no investment risk OR c) never bought the stock of Groupon. Your kind of thinking is what the investment bankers and institutional investors depend on to help them get their $10 Million+ bonuses.

    4. Re:If it walks like a duck... by u38cg · · Score: 1
      Fraud is fraud. If someone's trying to defraud you, particularly at that scale, there is little you can do to defend yourself other than be very careful. And keep an eye on economic reality.

      Here, though, we have really simple lack of comprehension about how Groupon, or any company, books sales. It sells coupons. The money it receives is its revenue. The article you linked has made the shocking discovery that revenue is not equal to profit. Well, duh.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    5. Re:If it walks like a duck... by glodime · · Score: 1

      The point is that Groupon shows a number of signs of fraud or at least concern for future revenue and profits.

      The allthingsd.com link I provided indicated that the vast majority of money raised by Groupon went straight to its founders and early investors, not to expand or improve the business that hasn't been showing a profit. This is a major red flag that this company might not have a bright future, regardless of fraud. The link that gklinger provided indicated the same as well as noting that the fundamentals are not sound (negative current assets and net losses). They also question a number of issues that may be problematic as competition increases for "social coupons" business. There was another linked minyanville.com article that highlighted how the revenue recognition used by groupon makes it more difficult to understand groupon's operations and compare them to other companies (another red flag). Now there are recent reports of the founder's less than pristine business record (another red flag). Groupon is a risky investment right now. They might get their shit together and capitalize on the early mover advantage for the current investors, but the only people that are likely to see big gains (or any at this rate) are the ones that just cashed in on the recent capital raises. Though, stranger things happen with business and investment (the internet, and housing/mortgage/CDO bubbles come to mind). I fail to see where the lack of comprehension comes in.

         

  17. Groupon: Flashback to 1999 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

        The whole Groupon thing reminds me of all the sites giving away stuff in the fall of '99.

        Like $25 off a purchase of $25 or more with free shipping.

        Not very many of those sites survived that Christmas.

    1. Re:Groupon: Flashback to 1999 by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Interesting

      JC Penney's has been giving out "$10 of a $10 purchase" flyers recently. The catch, of course, is that you won't be able to find any combination of things you want for more than $9.99 and less than $13 or so.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Groupon: Flashback to 1999 by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 2

      Thank you, MotherNature.com circa 1999, for the many, many, many boxes of free snacks and expensive chocolates shipped to me free I received.

      The beauty of transfer of wealth - filthy-rich "angel investors" giving me shitloads of free stuff. Those were the days.

      The problem with Groupon of course is that the transfer of wealth is not going from billionaires to cheap-ass fucks like me, but from small (and I mean small in the true sense) business owners to cheap-ass fucks like me. Not cool.

      --
      This space available.
  18. Where Did Groupon's Billion Dollars Go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Check this other article out...

    "In January, Groupon raised $950 million. By the end of March, it had $209 million in cash. What happened to all that money?"

    http://allthingsd.com/20110602/where-did-groupons-billion-dollars-go/

  19. That Interview. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy crap, I thought it was 8 mins long so I watched, then it ends and I find out it's 5 x 8 min long segments. This cannot be that interesting.

  20. Then there was the photographer who got screwed... by toby · · Score: 1
    --
    you had me at #!
  21. So maybe it should be titled: by toby · · Score: 1

    "Groupon is insolvent (and you can be, too!)"

    --
    you had me at #!
  22. How groupon can work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Here is where I think Groupon works:

    Yoga/Dance classes:
    - I have friends who teach yoga and dance classes. They pay a fixed amount to rent a studio space to teach a class ($15 per hour). Class is normally $15 per student. As long as 1 non-groupon person comes they break even on the space. They normally have 10 people in class, but with groupons it's up to 15 or 17. It's found money if ANYONE comes from Groupon. Once the person comes they try to get them to buy a 5 or 10 class card (@ $10 per class= $50) They are using Square to charge credit cards... people take 4 classes and not the 5th sometimes... this is how you do it.

    Pizza Places:
    I have a relative who owns 3 pizza places. It's costs him about $1.80 to make a regular size pizza. Slices are $2 each. If he sells a pizza normally at $10 groupon = $5..... he gets paid $2.50. He makes his 50 cents. And people always buy soda (where restaurants make their money anyway).

    Buffets:
    Unless wildly successful, 10 to 20% more people at a buffet won't make a big difference... again the money is made on drinks to go with it.

    I think the coffee shop requires too much individual attention per person.

  23. Webvan 2.0 by rudy_wayne · · Score: 2

    Eric Lefkofsky may have a 'dubious history', but how is this any different from what's been going on for the past 15 years? From Pixelon to Webvan it's been one fraud after another.

    1. Re:Webvan 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember fall of 2000 reading a short 3 inch story in the business section. Just a simple synopsis of a report where a researchers looked up the criminal records of the investors, board members, and CEO/CFO of 100 or so internet start ups. 30% had criminal records or other enforcement action against them related to securities fraud. Stuff like you have a guy fined and bared from selling securities by the SEC who is the CFO of hohahaha.com

  24. please by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Business owner didn't understand her business and made several mistakes.

    Every groupon I have used I have asked the owner or manager how they liked it, all of them where very happy.

    OTOH, they all new it was a customer grab, so they took steps to bring them back.

    I would imagine if they didn't asked fo he deal the was appropriate for the business it would have been a mistake.

    You're a business owner; may people make a living selling business owners services/goods. If you can't bother to understand those goods/services and just take them oat face value without analyzing them and using them in accordance with your needs you will be eaten alive.
    If you want something, and the person providing it won't gve you exactly what you want, you walk away. it's business.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:please by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

      That was my impression. She bit off more than she could handle and it failed.

  25. Groupon = parasite, pure and simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am amazed at how few people see what's really going on here.

    Groupon is a con job.

    It won't last, and lots of people will get burned.

    Just wait and see.

    1. Re:Groupon = parasite, pure and simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely right. A friend had the same happen to him (air blowing crook in the middle of a company), and the most astonishing thing was that the relevant crook managed to get a specific UK bank to pay him out their funds - without him even being on the account mandate, and that was after the bank had been warned by their solicitor (and by them) that something fishy was going on.

      After that it became a mess, and they had to pack in what started as a good company.

      Yes, the bank got away with it - but they are about 6 months away from discovering they are being excluded from a new global project. Guess why :-).

  26. Because it wasn't a done deal by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When a buyout offer happens one company to another, having the offer made and accepted is only the initial stages. It is kinda like buying a house. Google's people would then meet with Groupon's people, NDAs would be signed, and Google would start looking over the books, technology, and so on before committing to a final purchase.

    They could have very well realized that things wouldn't stand up to Google's scrutiny and Google would have backed out. Now that would really screw them because then if they try to go public everyone would ask "But why did Google back out?"

  27. Groupon pisses me off so much! Ruined a local spot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I figured that Groupon would want what was best for the business, but when I heard that a groupon deal went south for one of my favorite local cheesesteak shops I vowed to never allow anyone talk me into a Groupon deal. The thought that they wouldn't do everything possible to ensure the business was successful was evident in it bringing down a local business. They could likely been smarter about the whole thing, but evidence is clearly trending to this being at Groupons feet.

    This story does not surprise me, I'm just wondering when Groupon is going to be forced to take action for their grimy business practices. I'm hoping that we'll see their shit hit the fan soon...I just hope their not in anyone elses restaurant when that happens.

  28. Groupon salespeople trick people? by Moskit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In Poland one of well-known barbers, Jaroslaw Budny, opened a new barber shop and wanted a bit of promotion. He talked with Groupon, and based on their advice he issued haircut coupons at 29 PLN (instead of usual 70PLN). He only got 10 PLN out of each sale (33%) . Barber was however convinced by Groupon salesperson to not put any limit on number (they earn by number of coupons sold) who said things like "you will be lucky to sell 300 coupons, 100 is more realistic number, no need for limit". Sales were limited to 48 hours though.

    Guess what? People bought over 1600 coupons.

    Mr Budny is now working 7-22, not making any money, getting angry calls from thousands of "groupon customers". His name is now shattered and smeared all over internet for not keeping promises instead of being promoted. Waiting time to get a haircut done by him is now about a year.

    Did he make a bad decision? Yes, he did not limit his offer, but he did so on explicit advice by Groupon. It is scary that Groupon doesn't have any internal audits to make sure they don't do that to businesses - they should have if they have some ethics.

    Only after country-wide media ran the story he was contacted by Groupon who offered him some help (hire him a secretary to take calls, run another promotion without taking money, send email to coupon buyers explaining why waiting time is so long, offer money back and "sorry" gifts). Condition was that he no longer talks with any media about Groupon.

    *) disclaimer: above information based is based on articles widely available in Polish press.

    1. Re:Groupon salespeople trick people? by ledow · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but if that's how you run a business (totally believing salespeople that are leeching from you, without bothering to once pick up a calculator or estimate / limit demand yourself), then you deserve everything you get.

      If I phone up a company and convince them to let me issue coupons for their services as much as I like, they are the suckers, not me, because I won't have to do any work to cover those coupons whereas they will (and will get the bad press etc.)

      This is now the FOURTH sob-story I've read about a business not working out what a deal means before signing up to it, getting too much demand at zero profit that they're legally required to oblige, and then whining that it's someone else's fault they can't do maths.

      I'm not a ruthless businessman by any means - when I had my business, I was more likely to err on the side of customer satisfaction than my own profits quite often. But I never made a loss, and never signed a deal I hadn't thought through, never reneged on a deal, and NEVER operated at a loss or even zero profit.

      You go to Groupon to get bodies through your door. If you don't think about how you're going to handle that demand, or what will happen if it's too much, then you're not running a business, you're merely offering services. It's like advertising an offer on TV that everyone gets a free lesson or whatever and then being surprised that you have 10,000 people on your books, no time to fulfill them, no conversions to long-term customers (you can't handle the demand you created, so why would I expect you to handle me returning as well?), and an obligation to lose money on everyone who comes through the door because you didn't think it through.

      Groupon may be tricky salesman, maybe even erring on the side of con artists at points - but you know what, they're salesman. That's how EVERY salesman I've ever seen operate actually operates. If you don't know how to handle them and see through the crap then you're going to get stung by everyone from the guy selling you shampoo for your hairdressers to your accountant - GroupOn would just be one of many.

    2. Re:Groupon salespeople trick people? by Rhywden · · Score: 2

      That's a moronic stunt. If you roll over your customers you don't have a sustainable business model. Especially as your offerings are not needed to run a successful business.
      And, no, that's not how every salesman operates: You'll be treated very differently by salesmen who want to have you as a recurring customer instead of a one-trick-pony.

    3. Re:Groupon salespeople trick people? by Moskit · · Score: 1

      I largely agree with you.
      Issue stemst from the fact that many people out there are not businessman, they are just good in what they do. A barber would probably trust "advisors" from banks, insurance and other companies that in a way help him run the business.

      The way Groupon operates just highlights such problems. There is just as many problems from people who were ripped by banks and insurance companies.

      Big problem is that such stories do not attract sympathy for Groupon, but for businesses. This is why Groupon should put some safeguards in their business, not just profit from someone mistakes. Win-win situation.

      All of that is a real-life example of websites getting slashdotted. One big difference is of course being surprised by /. (most of the time), while you actively apply for Groupon.

    4. Re:Groupon salespeople trick people? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but if that's how you run a business (totally believing salespeople that are leeching from you, without bothering to once pick up a calculator or estimate / limit demand yourself), then you deserve everything you get.

      You're right however at the same time, it is not unreasonable to think Groupon would have the experience and the long term interest to fairly advise and help its customers (small businesses) do the right thing. If they fuck them over such as not putting caps on number of vouchers or bilking them out of a large % of the sales, then those businesses will tell every other business along their street what a shitty service it is. Within no time, NO ONE will deal with Groupon.

      Part of me suspects it's been designed as a scam since the beginning. A vehicle which is built on hype while the CEO and other stakeholders plunder as much as they can before the whole lot collapses. The sad thing is there is a kernel of a good idea, but the company that implements it properly will let businesses control the terms down the last T, set caps and keep 90% of the proceeds which are delivered in a timely fashion.

  29. Re:What do you expect from a JEW?! Charity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I expect Judaism.

  30. How groupon works and why it is a fraud by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Groupon has a simple mechanism it tries to sell: Get people in your store at any cost, then make a profit when they return.

    Normal advertising with discounts works differently, take for instance the special deals from your local super-market: We buy a larger amount then normal, at a discount, then pass this discount on to you, making less on the individual sale but more real sales.

    3 for the price of 2 is a typical format.

    Any side affect of attracting more customers is welcome BUT the supermarket owner will NOT think that customers who come in specially for that deal will convert to regular customers at any significant rate.

    Some other forms of discount are: We have to much stock and keeping it costs more then selling it with a smaller profit or even at cost. We want to shift a lot in a small time frame so we "pretend" to give you a discount but really we are not. And We need the sales so we give a massive discount to be able to close the books of a period with mass amount of revenue (In holland large chains holding "no sales tax" days.)

    Most of these discounts are aimed purely at selling an item, the discount is a way to make a sale that delivers a profit then and there. NOT some mythical future increase in your customer base.

    Groupon therefor is based on a rarely successful attempt of advertising, getting the cheap who look for deals and convert them into full paying customers. Contradiction in terms? What can possibly convert a bargain hunter into a loyal customer? Amazing service? Sure, if your amazing service is worth a 50% increase in price. Lets not forget that groupon discounts are also often insanely high. And on top of the discount, you also got to pay groupon a premium rate well above any other form of advertising.

    And then it is aimed not at large companies that can make long term investments but mom&pop shops that struggle to reach the end of the month in the black.

    It is a scam and Groupon will fail soon enough because it has decided to go world wide where the laws are a bit more protective of people and small businesses. In the meantime, if you own a small business and get contacted by Groupon. Don't.

    The pizza place mentioned in the story? A success because they did it twice? I wouldn't assume that. Lots of small business owner have no real way to track costs and benefits. They just know there is X in the register at the end of the day and that is a LOT more then normal. The real costs of making the X amount of revenue comes later.

    Simple example, from personal experience. Had a guy very happy who was selling power tools over the internet he had made a small fortune in revenue in the first week. And the cost of ordering the powertools was even LESS then the revenue, even with shipping costs substracted... pure profit!!! He forgot about returns, and warranties and etc etc etc. Do you know just how much a single customer complaining and needing to be talked to for an hour costs? Why do you think companies want as little customer support time as possible? Because it costs are high and it all comes out of the tiny amount of profit you thought you made on the sale.

    In business, you can make a ton of cash and still go bankrupt. Groupon is the perfect way to do this. Stay well clear.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:How groupon works and why it is a fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really good explanation.

      Key take away points for me:

      1) It's a high cost marketing strategy with a very low customer acquisition rate
      2) It requires a service/product to be Godly, worth the dramatic price increase if they became a normal customer
      3) It pushes massive up front production costs, increases daily take, but increases overall cost beginning to end without long term acquisition

      As a business owner, nothx!

    2. Re:How groupon works and why it is a fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On top of that: when they go bankrupt they will leave a trail of devastation behind them. As stated here: http://www.minyanville.com/businessmarkets/articles/groupon-groupon-ipo-tech-stocks-linked/6/3/2011/id/34936, they take about 60 days to pay the merchant. About 290 million dollar at the moment. Their current liabilities are about 520 million!

      In case of a bankruptcy banks and the irs will get their money first (at least that is how it always seems to turn out here in europe. I imagine it is the same in the US), so many small businesses will never see their money. Quite a few might even go bankrupt over this.

      I got a call from groupon about two weeks ago. I didn't really know much about them. I thought the sales person was joking when he said I would have to offer my products at half price and they would then take half of that as a commission. Some of my sales are through affiliates. Typical commission I give is about 5-10%! I can only see groupon be worthwhile for those who get a very large quantity of their business from repeat customers or for those who have large amounts of inventory they can't sell. But tbh. if you can't manage to sell your inventory yourself at 1/4 of the price, you might have bigger problems to worry about.

  31. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  32. mod this guy up! by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    What a great example. That's exactly the kind of business where someone is likely to be thinking in terms of "I'll try it out, if it's cheap" and there's virtually nothing you can say, or people can read, ahead of time that'll convince them they're going to like it. Trying it is the only way.

    Then maybe you hook 'em, maybe you don't. And virtually no marginal cost even if you don't.

    Groupon itself may be a bad business, but here's a case where the basic idea really does make sense.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  33. Re:"Lefkofsky" - that's a JEWISH name, isn't it... by Dainsanefh · · Score: 0, Troll

    White "Ashkenazim" Jews. Yup the type that believe they are the chosen one according to the Talmud.

    --
    Twitter: @dainsanefh
  34. Oh, come on. by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

    I usually don't mind finding additions on the Internet, but I'd rather block advertisements from getting through.

    If you're going to grammar-troll or spell-troll, at least attack a legitimate target. There are plenty to go around.

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  35. Advertising by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

    Alternate hypothesis: Today's ads better represent the industries that have bought into a heavy advertising philosophy than they do the industries that would most benefit. (or the ad methodologies) That, and ads are always more effective than the public gives them credit for (and usually less effective than the marketing staff thinks they are).

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  36. Not just fair, but often LEGALLY REQUIRED. by raehl · · Score: 2

    In many states in the US, if someone pays you $X, you are required to provide $X of service, and you can't have an expiration on it.

    So, you can advertise a coupon where someone pays you $X for $2X of services, and you can put an expiration date on it, but you're still legally required to redeem the $2X coupon for the $X paid for it even after expiration.

  37. Groupon is a stupid name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't like your jerkoff name. I don't like your jerkoff logo. And I don't like you, jerkoff.

  38. Groupons for Pot? by doccus · · Score: 1

    Considering the profit margins needed , i can only think of only one business that can survive the backhoe into the ledgers that Groupon appears to gouge out.. and that business is the illegal drug trade.. any guesses on the probability of seeing Groupons for, say, Pot? ..And, isn't Groupon the digital equivalent of the old coupon booklets that used to often cause headaches for retailers the minute they bought into them? A lot of retailers apparently didn't understand, then, either, that these are only useful if they increase the customer base, and/or traffic..

  39. Is Groupon Worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that retailers can't ignore Groupon. There are several ways to analyze how successful Groupon can be for your business. It may not help to increase revenue immediately but may help to acquire customers. This article has an in-depth Groupon case study http://www.ecommerceanalyticsblog.com/2011/03/17/customer-acquisition-analytics-a-groupon-case-study/