Slashdot Mirror


LulzSec Hacks the US Senate

jfruhlinger writes "LulzSec might not be as famous as Anonymous — they're really best known for hacking sites they like, to prove a point about security — but they may have just raised their profile significantly, posting what appears to be data taken from an internally facing server at the US Senate. However, the fun-loving group might find that the Senate reacts a lot more harshly to intrusions than, say, PBS did." The group also recently grabbed data from Bethesda Softworks.

17 of 344 comments (clear)

  1. Interesting by Jibekn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hope these guys are as good as they claim to be, otherwise we will be seeing their faces with the caption "Further arrests from anonymous hacking group"

    1. Re:Interesting by biodata · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm sure we will see this anyway. It's easy to arrest a few people on suspicion whether they did it or not. It doesn't matter if anyone gets convicted, the arrests are just a bit of media theatre and have to happen soon after the event. Like in Spain, Holland, Turkey, etc.

      --
      Korma: Good
    2. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      On another note, does Amazon keep any sort of network/VM logging from someone who spun up/used/spun down a virtual machine with a prepaid visa card?

      No, but they have shipping addresses of everybody who ever ordered a Guy Fawkes mask, which should be close enough for government work.

    3. Re:Interesting by DrBoumBoum · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're either a black hat for two reasons

      Maybe they're doing it for the lulz?

  2. Fed Reserve is up next by milbournosphere · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Apparently, Anonymous announced an intention to go after the federal reserve next: http://gizmodo.com/5811546/anonymous-goes-after-federal-reserve. It'll be quite interesting if they attempt it. I'm interested in seeing how the fed handles this.

    1. Re:Fed Reserve is up next by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Severe damage to the federal reserve. Hahaha that made my day, thanks. Buddy, the damage has already been done. There's nothing left.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Fed Reserve is up next by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is good criminal practice, to stay on "annoyance level". If you exceed that, law enforcement comes after you. If you exceed that enough, the people that come after you actually know what they are doing, are well funded and very, very persistent. If these clowns really manage to break into or do several damage to the federal reserve, they will end up in federal prison for a few decades. May take months or years to get them, but they will get caught.

      In fiscal year 2010, the FBI requested almost $50,000,000 in new resources for internet crimes. Any bets they get more than that in new resources this year?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    3. Re:Fed Reserve is up next by gweihir · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Believe that all you like. Then ask yourself who the larges employer of mathematicians (not an easy study by any means) in the world is. And they have other pretty good people too.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  3. Somebody is on a power trip by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Usually these end in tears. Only the most stupid black-hats (and that is all these morons are now) brag publicly.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Somebody is on a power trip by Dragon+Bait · · Score: 5, Funny

      Most likely have nothing to live for and are probably wanting to end it all by making others suffer.

      Are you talking about the hackers or the senators?

    2. Re:Somebody is on a power trip by wickerprints · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, of course the US Senate has the law on its side. They wrote the law, arguably to serve their own interests, just like the Fed is a group of bankers that regulate the banking industry. It's not accountability if you are only accountable to yourself.

  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. Is hacking spate supporting internet lockdown? by Savantissimo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems like the recent outbreak of high-profile cases of computer break-ins is almost calculated to provoke legislation locking down the internet. First the kill-switch proposal, the announcement by the US military that computer intrusion would be considered an act of war, now a constant drumbeat of reporting in the media about major cracks.

    Perhaps the hacks are all just being done by people who don't see how useful such stories are to those who want to assert control over the net, but it would be foolish to think that the "problem-reaction-solution" method has stopped being used by those who are after power, or to discount the possibility that some of this hacking and the publicity it receives is actually being provoked or even orchestrated by those seeking to expand government control over the internet.

    --
    "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    1. Re:Is hacking spate supporting internet lockdown? by VortexCortex · · Score: 4, Informative
      Perhaps that's exactly why the hacks are occurring...

      It seems like the recent outbreak of high-profile cases of computer break-ins is almost calculated to provoke legislation locking down the internet. First the kill-switch proposal, the announcement by the US military that computer intrusion would be considered an act of war, now a constant drumbeat of reporting in the media about major cracks.

      Perhaps the hacks are all just being done by people who don't see how useful such stories are to those who want to assert control over the net, but it would be foolish to think that the "problem-reaction-solution" method has stopped being used by those who are after power, or to discount the possibility that some of this hacking and the publicity it receives is actually being provoked or even orchestrated by those seeking to expand government control over the internet.

      Its remarkable how quickly the PATRIOT Act was "created" after 911. Most likely was waiting in a desk drawer waiting for something to polarize the public... Now we have teams of hackers that could literally be anyone, causing security problems across the board, from government, to business, to gamers. Clearly the people will now agree the government must put an end to it all...

  6. Re:Not what Obama meant by "open government"... by Hatta · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And when that ass gets kicked in the Senate's IT office, you'll have LulzSec to thank. If LulzSec could hack it, so could Iran. We should be grateful for the service they are providing.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  7. There's nothing important there by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's not some inside server. Look at their list of files. It's the Senate's outward-facing web server, "www.senate.gov". It also hosts the public web sites of individual senators. It looks like what you can see on a UNIX system with a guest account. Big deal. Every staffer on the Senate side has that much access.

    They have the complete directory of all the paintings in the Capitol. The forms for registering as a lobbyist. Pictures of all the Senators. Lots of stuff for tourists. This session's voting results, in HTML. The base Apache config. Nothing exciting.

  8. Re:Thanks Guys by EnsilZah · · Score: 5, Informative

    I know what they did is wrong and all but what you wrote sounds like "Look what you did, you've angered the master, now he's sure to give us all a good whippin'"