Slashdot Mirror


Righthaven Loses

A month ago we noted that the legal system had put Righthaven on hold, but now redwolfe7707 noted that "A federal judge in Nevada says a Las Vegas law firm targeting unauthorized content on the Internet cannot sue others over a news company's copyrights. The Las Vegas Sun reported Tuesday the dismissal of a lawsuit by copyright enforcer Righthaven LLC against the website Democratic Underground. U.S. District Court Chief Judge Roger Hunt says copyright plaintiffs must control the rights to material in order to sue for copyright infringement."

9 of 79 comments (clear)

  1. My favorite line. by SniperJoe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My favorite line from the judge's ruling?

    "IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Righthaven show cause, in writing, no later than two (2) weeks from the date of this order, why it should not be sanctioned. "

    Kudos to the Judge on this one.

    1. Re:My favorite line. by SniperJoe · · Score: 5, Informative

      By the way, Wired had a bit more information on the ruling also:

      http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/06/copyright-troll-sanctions/

      A link to the PDF of the judge's order can be found on the EFF's website as well:

      http://www.eff.org/cases/righthaven-v-democratic-underground

    2. Re:My favorite line. by DworkinLV · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      Browsing without an adblocker is like fucking without a condom - Mal-2
    3. Re:My favorite line. by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Informative

      It doesn't appear to be included in the rather poor article Slashdot chose to link, but the much better Ars piece links the actual ruling [pdf], which includes that sentence on the last page.

    4. Re:My favorite line. by SniperJoe · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you would kindly go to the PDF that I just posted of the actual judge's order (through the EFF's website) and scroll to IV. Order to Show Cause (page 15 of 16), it'll be there.

  2. Compare to BMI or iCopyright by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am sure that the newspapers will just grant full copyright to RightHaven, for a right to share in the spoils of the lawsuits.

    Or another variation: sell Righthaven the exclusive right to sublicense articles to other web sites. This would make Righthaven more like a copyright clearance agency such as BMI or iCopyright.

  3. Re:This is confusing, a little by Dragonslicer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Of course a company can hire a law firm to work on a lawsuit against anyone the company wants. When they do, though, the company's name, not the law firm's name, is attached to the case as the plaintiff. In this case, though, Righthaven is listed as the plaintiff, which means that they aren't the firm hired to work on the case, but that they are claiming to be the party that has been harmed.

  4. Re:This is confusing, a little by starfishsystems · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Reminds me of the old tale about the woodcutter and the layabout. The woodcutter is just doing his job, out there splitting logs for the village, working along quietly. Along comes the layabout, who sits down, makes himself comfortable, drinks a couple of beer, all the time making grunting and puffing noises in time to the work.

    At the end of the day, the woodcutter goes to collect his wages from the village clerk. The layabout tags along. Then, just as the bag of coins is brought out, he pipes up, "Hey, I'm entitled to half of that, because I did half the work. I made all the sounds."

    The clerk says, "Right then, let's be fair. I'll count it out." And he carefully counts it into two piles.

    The coins make a satisfying clinking sound as each pile grows. The layabout rubs his hands in anticipation. Then the clerk gathers the two piles together and gives the lot to the woodcutter, who cheerfully departs.

    "Hey, what about my share?", says the layabout.

    The clerk replies, "You've just been paid in full. You made only the sound of work, and so you have received only the sound of payment."

    --
    Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
  5. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion