Senator Releases First Senate Mobile App

GovTechGuy writes "Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) released an official application for the iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch, making him the first Senator to offer an official mobile application. The Chambliss app allows the public to call Chambliss' offices directly from the app and find in real-time information on the Senator's positions on current political topics."

Comments

Real time?

[Anonymous Coward]

Are his opinions changing so fast you need real-time information on them?

Re:Real time?

[chemicaldave]

Positions on current topics

not

Current positions on topics.

Re:Real time?

[dgatwood]

If he is like most politicians, then yes, sadly.

That said, if you want to see an app that reflects political reality more precisely, you'll have to wait for v2.0. It will have two (or more) versions of the positioning statement, depending on what it thinks you want to hear.

Just to be clear, I'm not saying that this particular politician is two-faced, but statistically, the politicians who aren't two-faced are in such a minority that they rarely appear as a non-zero quantity in any random sampling. Just saying.

Re:Real time?

[Kral_Blbec]

Most "current" topics have been around for several years. There arent really many new issues, just rehashes of old ones.

Re:Real time?

[ubermiester]

Positions on current topics

not

Current positions on topics.

you sure? this could be a tool for senators to flip-flop in real-time!

Re:Real time?

[Mindcontrolled]

You know, adapting your position to changing realities is generally viewed as rational. Leave it to american propaganda to make "flip-flopping" an insult. Can't hear it anymore, to be honest.

Re:Real time?

[10101001 10101001]

If flip-flopping in American politics were generally a byproduct of "adapting your position to changing realities" and not "voting for government spending towards my constituents to increase my reelection chances, pledges about supporting less government spending or statements of a core belief in the futility of government involvement in anything economic be damned" or "voting for more unsupervised government intrusion, despite my claims that such government supervision is evil", I'd agree. Oddly enough, of course, the American propaganda I most associate with "flip-flopping" was the former. The latter doesn't get called out as much because it's SOP, and few in Washington act like they really want to change things.

Re:Real time?

[Mikkeles]

Well, if the reason for changing (as appears to be a common case) is a new payoff ^W campaign contribution or the results of a new poll, then I think it should be an insult.

In the latter case, it may be acceptable for him to change the way he votes to match his constituents' wishes if he cannot convince them of his position; this should not, however, cause him to change his position.

Re:Real time?

[vlm]

I think I've finally figured it out. "current topics" are what I'd consider irrelevant noise, such as "what is the honorable senator's opinion of Sarah Palin's daughter's performance on american idol last night" and "Tell us how you feel about the recent tornadoes, senator"

Re:Real time?

[vlm]

That said, if you want to see an app that reflects political reality more precisely, you'll have to wait for v2.0. It will have two (or more) versions of the positioning statement, depending on what it thinks you want to hear.

Do you think google and facebook have enough information on "us" that they could automate this process? I shouldn't be saying this out loud, I should be selling this idea to election committees for crazy sums of money... I do believe we are nearing the era of automated individualized campaign ads. Next election cycle I expect to get spam about which candidate prefers vim or emacs... We're already only a step away from hearing "Vote for Gnome or KDE, don't throw your vote away on 3rd party candidates like XFCE."

Re:Real time?

[Lunix Nutcase]

You know, adapting your position to changing realities is generally viewed as rational.

And if that's what these senators and representatives actually did it would be a good thing. Unfortunately they change their minds on things purely based on who gave them the biggest campaign contribution.

Re:Real time?

[Mindcontrolled]

Well, in the end, a representative only acts as proxy for those he represents, doesn't he? Should be the voters, not the contributors, I completely agree on that. Then again, can it really work out if politicians only work on the basis of polls? Around here, in Germany, one pundit came up with the quite insightful epithet of "demoskopiebesoffen" - "drunk on demoscopy", drunk on polls. It's probably not healthy for the system in the long run, but i fail to see better alternatives.

Re:Real time?

[davester666]

The app uses a 1-900 number for his office.

You calling him helps keep him informed...and waist deep in hookers and blow!

This should be

[Capt James McCarthy]

A mandatory app for every elected official.

Re:This should be

[Anonymous Coward]

Really? The ability to call someone by downloading an app instead of dialing the phone should be mandatory?

This thing is more fluff then substance, there's already apps that look at positions on issues and voting histories for all of Congress.

Re:This should be

[scumdamn]

Right, because I'm sure people will waste space on their phone for an app for each of their elected representatives. He wasted the fee to create the app and the fee to get it into the App Store.

Re:This should be

[prgrmr]

It's all about marketing. Given the rates for TV, radio, and print advertising, this was undoubtedly a good investment.

Re:This should be

[smelch]

Right, because 3 apps is just way too many. Its not like we have gigs of memory. All of our iPhones are so maxed that we just can't spare less space than angry birds for keeping up to date with our representation in washington.

Re:This should be

[sohmc]

I agree

While yes there are other apps, when an elected official makes it easier for his constituents to look at his record, it's a win.

So far, I'm only familiar with one rep (Wolfe - VA) who offers his votes directly on his web site without going through thomas.loc.gov.

Re:This should be

[RazzleFrog]

How about if you make it mandatory make it work with the majority of smartphones? Talk about behind the times.

Re:This should be

[Anonymous Coward]

Using any application to view his voting record should mandatory for every voter.

Wow, CAPTCHA = involved, that's spooky.

Re:This should be

[Firehed]

http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=1&vote=00089

I'm sure it's not terribly mobile-friendly nor is it organized particularly well, but the information is out there. They should publish this data over some sort of API so we can make it presentable (whether as an app, a mobile site, or a stack of printouts), but unfortunately I can't fault them for not providing the data at all.

The piece about getting info on the Senator's stance on various issues is interesting. They should digitize that and then replace all of these guys with a small shell script.

Re:This should be

[Lunix Nutcase]

So iOS and Blackberry?

Re:This should be

[WrongSizeGlass]

Just wait for the "Re-elect Saxby Chambliss" ads that show up in his app ... along with links to donate to his re-election campaign.

Re:This should be

[mcgrew]

Rather than "more fluff than substance" I'd say is a misuse of technology by the technologically clueless. There is no reason to need an app to have your phone be able to see a web page, you simply have to write the web page using plain HTML. And an app to call from your PHONE is just retarded.

Re:This should be

[RazzleFrog]

You're further behind the times than the Senator. Droid took the lead.

Google - 33%
RIM - 28.9%
iOS - 25.2%

Keep in mind that is smartphones - doesn't include tablets. But if we are talking about making calls to your senator that is the more important number.

Re:This should be

[Lunix Nutcase]

You're further behind the times than the Senator. Droid took the lead.

You said "majority" not "the lead". Majority means more than half. 33% is not more than half but BlackBerry + iOS = 54.1% which is a majority. Either way, it was a sarcastic reply.

Re:This should be

[RazzleFrog]

But it doesn't work with Blackberry right now. It works with only iOS which is the minority of smartphones. If it worked with both then yes it would be the majority.

I understand it was sarcastic but it was also incorrect and illogical.

Re:This should be

[Anonymous Coward]

You're further behind the times than the Senator. Droid took the lead.

Google - 33%
RIM - 28.9%
iOS - 25.2%

Keep in mind that is smartphones - doesn't include tablets. But if we are talking about making calls to your senator that is the more important number.

Is that "current marketshare" or "installed base"? I bet BlackBerry has more users than Android and iOS, possibly even combined. There are a /lot/ of BlackBerries out there, and many people I know are using company issued 8800-series devices from ~4+ years ago...

Re:This should be

[vlm]

I love the combination of your signature and your post's last line. Took a second to realize that sig was not the last line of your post.

Re:This should be

[slick7]

A mandatory app for every elected official.

How about an app that lets these career criminal politicians know when their two terms are up.
Or an app that keeps a running total of all graft accepted from corporate gangsters and banksters.
And/or an app that counts all the lies these bastards tell without blinking their eyes.
Or how about an app that counts the days remaining until all American soldiers come home so they can kick some political ass and get these crooks out of office. Radical? I think not!

Re:This should be

[Anonymous Coward]

Actually, majority can be less than 50%. It simply has to be the largest segment of all segments represented. I know with the idiocy of the two party system that most people forget this but it is a fact.

Re:This should be

[Anonymous Coward]

If you aren't including all the iOS devices (or RIM playbook for that matter), why bother even posting the percentages. You know damn lies and statistics.

I have a hunch (i.e. unsubstantiated in anyway) that the iPad is a more interesting target platform. I have a feeling iPad users are spending more time reading "newspapers" and other information than people on the iPhone. Kicking back with the paper...why not check out what the ol'e senator is doing.

Re:This should be

[RazzleFrog]

As a percentage of tablets iOS on iPad is large but as a population it is still tiny compared to Smartphones.

Re:This should be

[Vegeta99]

Wait, why is it retarded? Does it run slower than other apps usually do?

I think it's a great idea, people are probably more likely to see an ad of his and download the app than they are to see an ad of his and visit his website.

Re:This should be

[mcgrew]

It's completely unnecessary. Wasting your phone's limited storage on unneeded apps is just stupid. Why would someone download an app before they'd be willing to visit a web page? That makes no sense whatever.

Smart phones are so smart.

[Anonymous Coward]

So with a "smart" phone, I need a custom app to call the Senator's office's telephone number? That's "smart".

Re:Smart phones are so smart.

[Anonymous Coward]

No worse than the tons of web pages that have Google or Bing searches built into them. Plus the app does more, you just kinda glossed over that, right? I have to give this guy points for effort if nothing else. It's more than my congresscritter has ever done for me.

LOL

[Anonymous Coward]

Oh, how I'd enjoy downloading that app and then asking that jackhole how he feels having demonized a triple-amputee war veteran out of office with his scurrilious anti-american lies.

I am sure Chambliss will discontinue use of the app almost immediately once he figures out that his constituents have actual criticisms of his asshole positions.

Wow!

[excelsior_gr]

Just what was missing! An app for a cellphone that enables you to... call someone?! Wait, what?

Re:Wow!

[Ihmhi]

That's nothing. A New Jersey senator's recent app automatically raises your property taxes every time you call his office.

Re:so

[Lunix Nutcase]

Do you really want Rep. Weiner sending you pics of himself?

He's my Senator, unfortunately

[sandytaru]

Now I wish I had an iPhone so I could give him an earful that way.

Re:He's my Senator, unfortunately

[Anonymous Coward]

Yea mine too. This guy is a real dick. Call him why? He could care less for what I have to say. He only listens for money. He's just a corporate whore.

Old news

[Anonymous Coward]

The Congress app for Android is very useful for this.
It puts both the Senate and house on speed dial.

Why just have one Senator when you can have em all?

Re:Old news

[eedwardsjr]

You beat me to it. I was going to brag on this app. I've been using it around a year and it is pretty slick. Hopefully it is on iPhone as well.

flip flops?

[vlm]

find in real-time information on the Senator's positions on current political topics

I don't know anything about the guy, but when you need networked computer automation to track how a politician flip flops on issues, something's wrong.

Re:flip flops?

[Dog-Cow]

Since your reading comprehension is non-existent, I would guess it doesn't really matter.

A little late there, and less useful

[cHiphead]

Useless and late by a day or two. The congress app on android just came out and it is insanely more in depth, and does not have its content controlled directly by the politician that you are trying to contact.

so its a phone book entry?

[maliqua]

branded as an app wow how little content it takes to be news worthy

Re:so its a phone book entry?

[Lunix Nutcase]

When has samzenpus ever posted anything that was truly newsworthy? About only thing he posts is idle shit, idle shit posted outside of idle to get around the fact that almost everyone has blocked idle, and shill reviews for Packt Publishing books.

Re:so its a phone book entry?

[smelch]

Uh, no. See, what's kind of cool about people is they can communicate. And this is one way for Chambliss to communicate with you (and also provides contact info for you to communicate with him, through abstraction).

The Chambliss app allows the public to call Chambliss's offices directly from the app and find in real-time information on the Senator's positions on current political topics. Users can also access news articles, e-newsletters, videos and photos from their phones and participate in constituent surveys.

How is any of that bad, how is any of that not nice to do? Yeah, its all from him, but it isn't a "propoganda stream" like others have asserted. It is simply a way for him to express his opinion on things so you know what he thinks about stuff. WTF, this is exactly what has been missing. And yes, it isn't always going to be truthful because its coming from him, but subjective information is as important as objective information. When you want to know what somebody thinks, you don't go ask a 3rd party. If you want to know what they did, usually a third party would be more reliable information.

Why do I get the feeling if Chambliss was a D, people would love his embrace of technology?

Re:so its a phone book entry?

[Lunix Nutcase]

WTF, this is exactly what has been missing.

How has it been missing? Chambliss, like almost every other Senator and Representative, already has a webpage with all that information already. This app is just some lame repackaging of his webpage and a call feature.

Why do I get the feeling if Chambliss was a D, people would love his embrace of technology?

Because you're an idiot?

Re:so its a phone book entry?

[Anonymous Coward]

Why do I get the feeling if Chambliss was a D, people would love his embrace of technology?

If he was a Democrat, Slashdotters, likely including you, would be sobbing about how much public tax money he has wasted creating this app. And you would be modding each other up to +5, Insightful, in a frenzy of libertarian self-adulation.

So it's like a web site

[istartedi]

Sounds like a web site. They stuck "app" on it. Booooring. Wake me up when you have an iCloudApp. Now, that would be truly revolutionary. Bonus points if it has synergy.

Re:So it's like a web site

[Darinbob]

But aren't the vast majority of phone apps merely web sites with the word "app" stuck on them? So this is just following established faux-tech practices.

Re:So it's like a web site

[Virtucon]

Exactly! Another example of why most of the App Store "apps" are truly LAME..

Shit, why didn't he now put in one of those Quick Response bar codes on his website so you can take a picture and download it immediately? Then the senator would be truly high tech.

its a start

[Phantom of the Opera]

Towards a more real seeming democracy. We need more technology integration with our legislative process. Seriously, we should be table to track down our money to the dollar.

Re:its a start

[geekoid]

For most of it, you can.

Attack ad

[KPU]

Does it come with free Cleland attack ads?

Re:Attack ad

[bugs2squash]

The in-app upgrade to replace Chambliss with Cleland is patent encumbered.

Re:Attack ad

[Anonymous Coward]

So, you're saying that that feature is crippled?

(Posting AC for obvious reasons. Am not Tracy Morgan.)

Re:Attack ad

[Anonymous Coward]

No -- those cost an arm and a leg. And a leg.

+1 RETARDED

[Anonymous Coward]

Dedicated propaganda stream.

I'm about to go all Saxby Chambliss on this crap, already.

And it will be hacked in 3 2 1 ...

[WillAffleckUW]

We have hack!

Senator's Positions on Political Topics

[kannibal_klown]

I wonder if it will have an archive feature, if so for the various senators out there I imagine it would be like this:

1-June-2011 - For X
2-June-2011 - Received donation from group Y
3-June-2011 - Against X
4-June-2011 - Received larger donation from group Z
4-June-2011 - For X

Again, in general. I know nothing about the senator in question.

Re:Senator's Positions on Political Topics

[stinerman]

You missed the much more obvious one:

1-June-2008 - For X
4-June-2008 - Gives speech on floor of Senate extolling the virtues of X over some heavy-handed big government program Y
1-June-2011 - President Obama comes out for X
2-June-2011 - Against X
4-June-2011 - Gives speech blasting X as a plan to steal money from unborn Christian U.S. Marines and give it to Union-backed Atheist Socialist Muslim Homosexuals

There's a bit of a lag...

[Anonymous Coward]

...as it waits for Goldman Sachs and BP to tell the Senator where he stands on those topics.

The Corporate Version

[Dyinobal]

I hear the corporate version comes with a button to make campaign donations and change his position on issues.

What can we learn from this?

[BitZtream]

Nothing we probably didn't already know sadly.

It basically shows that the senator and his office are completely technologically inept, and too lazy/stupid to find someone who is qualified to help them out.

They spent money ... to make an app ... that can be done in HTML ... and work on every device that has a web browser rather than JUST iOS.

So what you should take from this is that this senator and his office are ignorant, lazy, wasteful, and fad followers who care more about popular opinion than doing their job.

As I said, probably nothing you didn't already know.

And as a certified iOS fanboy ... let me add ... DO YOU HAVE ANY FUCKING CLUE HOW GOD DAMN ANNOYING IT IS TO HAVE TO DOWNLOAD A FUCKING APP BECAUSE YOU STUPID JACKASSES WANTED TO FOLLOW THE CURRENT FAD RATHER THAN JUST MAKING IT A FUCKING WEBSITE. GIVE ME A DAMN WEBSITE, NOT FREAKING APP. ... god I hate that, especially when they require you to use the app rather than providing a web based alternative of any sorts.

Re:What can we learn from this?

[Un pobre guey]

Simmer down, Dude. I hear what you're saying. Come HTML5, more or less here already, there is no compelling, practical reason to write an "app," unless what you really want to do is hack into the phone. These days, apps are little more than an already passing fad.

This, of course, is only true if the APIs accessible from the web page can get the data you need, such as GPS data, voice, camera functionality, etc. Could be a big if.

Re:What can we learn from this?

[Anonymous Coward]

Well, they had more planned - but then somebody pointed out that the "Lynch a Coon", "Burn a Mooslem" and "Drag a Fag" minigames might not go over well with anyone besides the Senator's constituents...

Real time information?

[Kral_Blbec]

Does his position change so frequently it has to be updated in realtime?

Re:Real time information?

[Lunix Nutcase]

It depends on how quickly the lobbyists get new bribes in to him.

Re:Real time information?

[Un pobre guey]

Actually, it's a collection of RSS feeds from his lobbyists. 100% hands-free operation.

Re:Real time information?

[grasshoppa]

Wish I had mod points.

Most Needed Feature

[SteveHeadroom]

Needs as "Bribe/Campaign-Contribution" button.

You are mistaking congress apps for personal ones

[SuperKendall]

Useless and late by a day or two. The congress app on android just came out and it is insanely more in depth

The difference is that the app is by a congressman, not ABOUT the congress. The whole story is that it's from a congressman, not a general app...

There are lots of apps about the congress - like this one:

Useless and late by a day or two. The congress app on android just came out and it is insanely more in depth

But there are scores of other ones too, on iPhone and probably android.

and does not have its content controlled directly by the politician that you are trying to contact.

No, instead they are controlled by whoever writes the app, with an unknown agenda and not electable.

Oh yes, terribly important

[Un pobre guey]

Oh yes, yes, of course! Terribly important to know a politician's "position" on "current political topics" or better yet, on the ever so important "issues." Not what lobbyists are paying them to do, nobody gives a crap about that. We care deeply and passionately, and discuss interminably, politicians' "positions" on "issues." Must be why our body politic, society, and economy are so advanced, prosperous, and are examples to the world.

Wonderfull

[houghi]

The Chambliss app allows the public to call Chambliss' offices directly from the app

They must have thought that it would be great to be able to have a handheld device usable to make telephonic conversations towards a fixed telephonic device. Then they though: we must make an app for that.

Also to find real-time information must have been a great idea.

I am old fashioned. I would have used a standard phone line and a standard web server, thus not excluding many.

This most likely is not about giving information, but about some senator trying to look 'hip' with the youngsters.

I wonder

[Tebriel]

Does it automatically give me his twitter feed too?

Re:I wonder

[Lunix Nutcase]

Are you hoping to get tweeted pics of him in his boxers with a visible boner?

Re:I wonder

[Un pobre guey]

You mean his Twit Feed? He's a politician, after all.

Re:I wonder

[vlm]

Agreed, that's bad. But, look on the bright side, I haven't heard of any politicians tweeting a self made goatse... at least, not yet...

Apple Press Release

[Anonymous Coward]

CUPERTINO, California—June 15, 2011—Apple® today announced that they will be removing the mobile web application created by Representative Anthony D. Weiner (D - NY) from the app store. Apple stated, "We do not believe the 'The Weiner app' is appropriate considering the pornographic content.".

Rube Saxby Goldbliss.

[blair1q]

Seriously, I need a smartphone to go on the web to download an app so I can push one button to call a phone-bot to dial up issue text that I could get just by going to a website on the same phone?

Recall this fucktard. He's unfit to serve.

Question for the old farts

[Anonymous Coward]

Listening to C-SPAN, there seems to be a confusion in terminology in the illustrious halls of Congress.

There is a site called Twitter, or twitter.com if you want to get particular, and it offers the capability to send messages known as tweets. And tweet can also be used as the verb.

But I almost exclusively hear representatives and senators saying, "oh yes, I twitter, I twittered such and such about this and that, and he twittered me back."

Is there anyone here who has confused the terms twitter and tweet? Especially anyone under, say, 40? I'm just curious at what age people start to lose their ability to pick up new expressions without making those characteristic "old person" mistakes.

Re:Question for the old farts

[Lunix Nutcase]

You have to forgive them. Only a few years ago did they realize that the Internet was a not a big truck but a series of tubes.

Re:so

[pixelpusher220]

no but there is a RSS feed. Really Stupid Sexting...

Max Cleland

[Anonymous Coward]

Does the app come up with ways to talk trash about people who have served in the military? If it does it should be named Saxbybot.

Re:Max Cleland

[Lunix Nutcase]

Yeah you gotta love when these chicken hawk, draft dodging Repuglicans trash people who didn't skip out of military service while trying to wrap themselves in the flag (see also Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfield, etc).

How about an actual app?

[spitzak]

I agree that an app to do what a web page does is pretty stupid.

However I wonder if it would be possible to make an app that actually did what is promised: "produce the Senator's position on a current political topic". Ideally the user could type in an arbitrary question and it would say what the Senator would think. This must be done without actually asking the Senator or any other human.

The first version could be an interesting experiment in AI. It has to produce "approve" or "disapprove" or "I did not understand" to all questions, and the positions have to be consistent and make sense. The easiest version would be to make an extreme right-wing or extreme left-wing version first, then try to adjust it to actually match the Senator (maybe it could be "trained" by the Senator by him answering specific questions generated by the program so it could fill in it's weighting tables).

I thought also a much harder problem would be to have the AI actually produce an explanation of why it approves or disapproves of an idea. But in fact to match current politicians it is trivial: anything you disapprove of is "job killing", anything you approve of "helps small businesses". These rules seem to work for every single argument by any political party nowadays.

Android "congress" app

[Atmchicago]

I've had an app called "Congress" installed for a while. It allows you to do this for all members of congress, it lists all recent legislation, you can see where and what shape districts are... It's a good step in making our government more accessible. Communication with our representatives should be accessible.

Too bad it's just a recording

[Anonymous Coward]

"Your potentially terrorist linked interest in patriotic government operations has been noted, citizen. Jesus loves you."

Why?

[kevkoh]

There are already lots of apps for tracking all of Congress. http://blogs.loc.gov/law/2011/06/theres-a-congressional-app-for-that/

Honesty!

[thePowerOfGrayskull]

Wow, honesty from a politician - who would have thought it could happen.

and find in real-time information on the Senator's positions on current political topics

You see that? That right there is a candid admission that he changes positions with the blowing of the political winds (perhaps more so when they are north-north-west but stays stable when the wind is southerly?) and that an app is required to keep up with these shifting views. Well done!

Waffling already?

[Anonymous Coward]

"...find in real-time information on the Senator's positions on current political topics"

Does this mean that they change?

where's Ted Stevens when you need him?

[vaporland]

an app that maps the series of tubes that is the internet would be totally awesome...

At least it wasn't Weiner...

[Anonymous Coward]

I totally don't want to see HIS app!!!!

OK, let me explain why its good

[Shivetya]

Because far too many "smart" phone users cannot be bothered with politics except on message boards. Far too many would never venture near a Congressman's website but I bet quite a few would download an app just for the sheer chance they could ridicule it or his positions. They would in fact be getting the information he wanted that they normally would never access.

So make information cool, if that means repackaging it, then by all means. Just because you and I know where to look for information does not mean others do. As I said above, many who could probably would not unless it was stupidly easy - like an app.

I know people with apps for the Constitution, Bill of Rights, Bible, Koran, and other easy to find documents, why is that?

Old news.

[scum-e-bag]

Australian MP Malcom Turnbul did this gaes ago.

http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/malcolm-turnbull-mp-federal/id374939098?mt=8

I'd rather have an app

[SwampChicken]

...that blocked any/every politician from my mobile media.

Good

[Anonymous Coward]

Thank you, good info

David

this from a ga resident

[Anonymous Coward]

the man is useless