Google Hits One Billion Unique Visits In a Month
BogenDorpher writes "According to statistics from ComScore, for the first time ever, a website drew one billion visitors worldwide in just one month. Guess what website came out on top? Google of course. Microsoft and Facebook rounded out the top three. From the article: 'Though Google captured the most visitors last month, users collectively spent the most time at Facebook--250 billion minutes in May, compared with 200 billion minutes at Google and 204 billion at Microsoft."
Updates perhaps? They don't say whether they counted phone-home updates in this study or not.
What, exactly, are people *doing* at Microsoft's website that would take 204 Billion minutes?
Filling Bug Reports
MSDN developer documentation and admin reference. People do write Windows software and administer all those systems, you know.
Took me a second.
They don't mean a billion clicks.
They mean a billion different people. One seventh of the world's population followed any of Google's URI's at some point during the month.
Fuck.
That goodness we have pope like you to judge the value of other peoples time.
You're no different the people who try to dictate what should be allowed on TV, which websites should not be allowed, and what god to follow.
A matter of personal opinion is trying to dictate? Suggestion: go have a nap, let me waste in peace some time and bandwidth ... on /.
Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
Just made me curious: how many visitors/minutes on /.?
Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
Have you ever tried using any Microsoft websites to find answers to... anything? It's all advertising. God help you if you have a technical query.
Such a headache. I can believe that someone could spend equal or more time there.
I just don't even bother any more.
I vote based on politicians' actions, unless contrary to my preconceptions. Often wrong, never uncertain. #iamthe99%
I am there just about everyday on Technet, reading through knowledge base articles, or downloading software / patches. It is almost always a Google search that has gotten me to that particular Microsoft page ;)
Because this is a story about the Internet, which runs on Facebook.
Because this is a story about the Internet, which runs on Facebook.
That's news to me. I thought AOL was the Internet ... and a whole lot more.
The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
That goodness we have pope like you to judge the value of other peoples time.
You're no different the people who try to dictate what should be allowed on TV, which websites should not be allowed, and what god to follow.
A matter of personal opinion is trying to dictate? Suggestion: go have a nap, let me waste in peace some time and bandwidth ... on /.
I agree. Now if you'd said, "Facebook should be made illegal" that would be different. I'd still agree with you, but that would be somewhat dictatorial.
The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
250 billion minutes were wasted playing absurd games
200 billion minutes were used searching for information and pictures on Anthony Weiner
205 billion minutes were used downloading the latest version of the Microsoft Malicious Software Removal Tool.
Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
People don't spend massive amounts of time just google searching ... or bing searching ... the do however spend lots of time reading their email on the sites both of those providers provide.
Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
I'm responsible for all KINDS of different searches from over 20 IP's...
Oops, we stand corrected: Make that 999,999,981 unique visitors.
Of course, we kind of fudged the underage we got from the countless Internet cafés worldwide, then jiggled things a bit to cope with laptops and tablets in Starbucks and airports... oh - we did catch that two month period when you were leeching off your neighbour's wifi. And we tried to tell the difference between the times when you accessed the web via your Kindle, your XBox and your Android phone, because you know, at this level of accuracy, mere statistical analysis isn't going to cut it....
So... thanks a bunch for clearing that up. Our numbers just wouldn't be the same without the benefit of your little anecdote....
Oh, wait - yes they would.
sincerely,
ComScore
Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.