Slashdot Mirror


Australia's 2 Largest ISP's Start Censorsing the Web

unreadepitaph writes "Looks like after Stephen Conroy's web filter went down in flames he went quietly behind the backs of Australians and struck a deal with Telstra and Optus to start filtering an undisclosed blacklist of sites from organization within and external to Australia. From the article: 'Electronic Frontiers Association board member Colin Jacobs also expressed concern at the scheme, saying the Government and internet providers needed to be more upfront about websites being blocked and offer an appeals process for website owners who felt URLs had been blocked unfairly. "There is a question about where the links are coming from and I'd like to know the answer to that," Mr Jacobs said."

34 of 133 comments (clear)

  1. I wouldn't be too worried... by mfearby · · Score: 2

    ...because the current government is utterly doomed at the next election, and all their half-baked ideas will be junked, like they should be. Given the current - and trending downwards for over 12 months now - opinion polls, they'll be reduced to a mere rump of their former selves. The Australian Labor Party federally has the same disease as their state-based comrades in New South Wales and will be severely punished in similarly spectacular fashion at the next election, you mark my words :-)

    1. Re:I wouldn't be too worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then Australia will have the Mad Monk for Prime Minister. You'd better pray the Liberals have another spill before then- all too likely given the fact that there's a few years to go before an election has to be called.

    2. Re:I wouldn't be too worried... by Namarrgon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Doesn't matter if they win or not. The Greens, who will have the balance of power in the Senate, have said they're opposed to any mandatory filtering, so the government would be unable to pass any filtering bills anyway.

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    3. Re:I wouldn't be too worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...because the current government is utterly doomed at the next election, and all their half-baked ideas will be junked, like they should be.

      Unfortunately for us, the Liberal opposition to filtering schemes is that Labor don't go far enough. When I last discussed it with my local Lib candidate, he said that Labor were missing the boat by not including gambling, abortion, and other such sites on the black list. And that I should vote for him to make sure we get a proper family-friendly internet in Australia, instead of the dangerous and scary half-assed Labor internet. Both sides are playing the family-fear card here. They've got Today Tonight viewers convinced that overseas pedos can crawl up your phone line and out of your computer to rape your kids! (Maybe we should start a campaign to glue your USB ports shut to prevent the pedos getting out. :-)

      Currently, anyone who wants a free internet has to hope for the Greens. We're fucked.

    4. Re:I wouldn't be too worried... by KiloByte · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't see them removing existing bills, though. This is the standard operating procedure: an unpopular law goes in, then after the election everyone mysteriously "forgets" about it.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    5. Re:I wouldn't be too worried... by Cimexus · · Score: 2

      Keep in mind this is just a private decision made by two particular ISPs. I don't really have a problem with that - can always change ISPs to one that doesn't do this, if I so desire. Most people simply won't care though.

    6. Re:I wouldn't be too worried... by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      always

      Use of that word is (almost) always inappropriate.

    7. Re:I wouldn't be too worried... by Lakitu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      why do people say things like this?

      "Voluntary compliance" with a government is never necessarily voluntary, considering the weight behind government suggestions. If the government wants people to do it, it should be a law. It's not a law because it's invasive and improper. This doesn't mean the government can lean on businesses to get what it wants extralegally, because it can be indistinguishable from a threat.

    8. Re:I wouldn't be too worried... by Cimexus · · Score: 2

      A good point. However the proportion of Australia where there wouldn't be any alternative is considerably less than the proportion of some countries that there wouldn't be an alternative. Due to the fact Telstra is forced to wholesale access to its phonelines, if you have a phone line, you can most likely get a different ISP. In ~most~ cases (though not all).

      Of course chances are that that other ISP will just be resold Telstra Wholesale access, but that would still get you around the filter.

    9. Re:I wouldn't be too worried... by xaxa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Good thing I live in EU .... and its my right to have uncensored internet

      It is? DNS is filtered for child porn websites in at least the UK (for some major ISPs) and Finland (IIRC).

      (In the UK last time I checked, by doing a DNS query on a blocked hostname, my small ISP returned the IP but my parents' large ISP gave a 'no such domain' message.)

      For Finland, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lapsiporno.info

      (At work, "Access to lapsiporno.info has been blocked as 'Adult / Sexually explicit'". Shouldn't that be 'Child / Sexually explicit' ... though I'm not going to ask them to change it;-)

    10. Re:I wouldn't be too worried... by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      The link you provide for Finland explicitly states that all four major ISPs in the country to NOT censor anything, and many of those who sensor provide an "alternate sensored DNS" in addition to normal, non-sensored one. Only a few small regionals actually sensor (probably in attempt to market themselves to families with children).

  2. Wait until the list is leaked. by Boltronics · · Score: 4, Insightful

    WikiLeaks will show them the stupidity of this.

    In the meantime, time to fire up Tor and change ISPs.

    --
    It's GNU/Linux dammit!
    1. Re:Wait until the list is leaked. by gtch · · Score: 2

      time to fire up Tor and change ISPs.

      Isn't that redundant?

    2. Re:Wait until the list is leaked. by rvw · · Score: 2

      WikiLeaks will show them the stupidity of this.

      In the meantime, time to fire up Tor and change ISPs.

      Better move to another country...

    3. Re:Wait until the list is leaked. by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 2

      Will that actually change anything though?

    4. Re:Wait until the list is leaked. by alanthenerd · · Score: 4, Informative

      Plus if you don't change they will think that their actions are acceptable. If at the point you contact them to cancel their service you tell them why and enough other people do likewise they may realise that filtering isn't acceptable and stop doing it.

  3. "Second Largest ISP" by Skythe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just before someone chimes in with this, iiNet is the 2nd largest ISP in terms of Broadband DSL subscribers - Optus would have more combined subscribers with DSL/Cable/other (which is what OP would be referring to).

  4. Blah Blah Blah by Wild+Wizard · · Score: 2

    Get your real info from here :-

    http://whirlpool.net.au/wiki/cleanfeed

  5. Hmmmmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why does everyone want to save me? I am happy to be damned!

  6. Related to the NBN deal? by Boltronics · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gizmondo recently wrote that Optus and Telstra have just signed a lucrative NBN deal. Coincidence?

    Can't force it through parliament, so get the major ISPs to voluntarily do it via an offer they can't refuse?

    --
    It's GNU/Linux dammit!
    1. Re:Related to the NBN deal? by Boltronics · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Telstra and Optus announced support for filtering back then too.

      Looking through the comments of that old link, I see the suspicions have long been present.

      --
      It's GNU/Linux dammit!
  7. You ain't seen nufin yet - NBN will be the end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is only the start of it.

    The NBN will kill the Internets as Australians know it.

    The current plans to force everyone to connect to the NBN weather they want to or not gives the Grubbermint instant control over all net traffic.

    FWIW, the biggest winners from NBN will be Foxtel and other media providers who will simply suck up as much bandwidth as they can get. The current cable TV networks will be shut down and everything will be moved to the NBN. Where do you think the bandwidth is going to go then?

    All telephone lines including POTs will be routed though the NBN.

    The people who actually believed the garbage about 100Mb to their homes were only dreaming. They never had a hope of getting those sort of speeds as it was never in the game-plan.

    The NBN is going to make Telstras Bigpond look like a good deal. All of the current ISP's will simply be relegated to be billing companies. In one swoop the Grubbermint get the control they want and their friends in big corporations that will hire them when they get thrown out of office will have somewhere cushy for htem to sit while they continue to suck on the public tit with their pensions.

    Australia, is having a lemon shoved down it's throat, while the vocal kiddies who dream of 100Mb porn to their screens are being flashed a pair of titties to tease them.

  8. Why are the so obsessed with this? by enter+to+exit · · Score: 2

    Why the hell is Conroy still pushing for this? He has a face saving excuse to drop it with the hostile parliament so why doesn't he just drop it?

    It seems like he's taking it _way_ to personally. It's as if he wants to filter the net just to spite everyone.

    What's the bet this is just going to be DNS filtering?

  9. Re:You ain't seen nufin yet - NBN will be the dawn by gtch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or, to put it more rationally:

    The NBN takes the aging copper network out of private hands where Telstra was using it to restrict competition, and replaces it with an open-access high speed network open to full competition.

    Just to be clear: almost everyone being forced to switch to the NBN is currently using Telstra infrastructure. If you're on iiNet, Internode, TGP, Optus ADSL etc then you're using Telstra copper. The only people being forced to switch to the NBN who aren't using Telstra infrastructure now are the relatively small number of people on Optus Cable Broadband. After the switch to the NBN, you'll still be using iiNet, Internode, etc for your internet access (if you want to) but instead of using Telstra's infrastructure you'll be using NBNCo's infrastructure. And it will be damn fast and more reliable. And it won't be Telstra... which in itself is simply wonderful.

  10. Censorship by sqrt(2) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The act of censorship is always more obscene than the material being censored. My personal opinion.

    --
    If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
  11. We have something like this in the UK by splodus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's a 'voluntary' scheme whereby the biggest six ISPs implement a block list maintained by an organisiation called the 'Internet Watch Foundation'. They claim that only child pornography sites are blocked, but of course there's no way to know what is on the list.

    Recently the first efforts to expand block lists to include 'other illegal' content have been made, and to set up a list for copyright-related restricted sites.

    It seems governments have realised that legislative oversight is a bit of a nuisance, and it's just easier to coerce and/or bribe big business to get what you want.

  12. He's that sort of person by dbIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He takes a lot of things way too personally. One hysterical press release of his was about a "lesbian cabal" that was trying to stop the NBN. It turned out to be a female staffer that was insisting on sticking to tendering procedure to avoid legal problems and a female former member of his department that just happened to work for a potential contractor that agreed to wait until a contract had been drawn up before signing on. Two parties agreeing not a sign a blank cheque became a "lesbian cabal" in a bizzare press conference.
    Thanks to the necessity of dealing with Telstra the Communications Ministry is almost a punishment post so it has been historically been given to a complete dropkick that a Government hates but has to give something to keep a powerful faction happy. Thus the long string of utter bastards and incompetant wankers in the job. Sadly Conroy is a competant wanker so actually manages to make progress on a filtering policy that his own party hates and only put up to get the reactionary weirdo vote. If he stuffed about on the policy for a decade saying it was a good idea and he'd do something soon (which is what the previous government did) everyone would be happy - even the weirdos that may get a few more paying customers in their fake churches.

  13. Re:Optus and Telstra? Who cares? by Boltronics · · Score: 2

    My ISP (Exetel) uses Optus to provide their Internet services. It is unclear to me if this means I will get the block list, but I don't want to take any chances.

    The article mentions two other smaller ISPs voluntarily censoring the web. I'll bet one is Primus. Anyone got any idea what the other one would be?

    --
    It's GNU/Linux dammit!
  14. Re:You ain't seen nufin yet - NBN will be the dawn by gtch · · Score: 2

    Today, Gillard and NBN paid Eleven Billion Dollars to buy the Telstra copper network. Do you really think they're going to rip it out or decommission it?

    Yes, they are decommissioning the entire copper network: http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/350563/telstra-nbn_co_deal_telstra_plans_phased_copper_decommission/

  15. Re:Optus and Telstra? Who cares? by LordLucless · · Score: 2

    I doubt it. All information I hear indicates that it's a DNS-level block, and every ISP I've ever used runs it's own DNS servers. Haven't used Exetel, but I doubt they're an exception. Telsta/Optus just provide access to the infrastructure for most of those arrangements, no service on top of it.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  16. Anti-Democratic, Anti-Republican by nickmalthus · · Score: 2

    "Fascism should rightly be called Corporatism, as it is the merger of corporate and government power." Benito Mussolini

    --
    If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be-T J
    1. Re:Anti-Democratic, Anti-Republican by silentcoder · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mussolini did NOT say that. He did love the phrase and tried to claim credit for it, but it wasn't his.
      The phrase was written by philosopher Giovanni Gentile in the Encyclopedia Italiana much earlier.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  17. About 5,250,000 results by sgt+scrub · · Score: 2

    When you google "Australian Evangelical Churches". Maybe that is why they claim social media tools edged out pornography as the nations No.1 internet activity by 09. Or better yet, how they know.

    http://www.eyefortravel.com/news/online-travel/social-channels-top-porn-sites-australia

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  18. The Doctrine of Fascism by Garrett+Fox · · Score: 2

    Check out the essay "The Doctrine of Fascism", attributed to him. Its roots are really in the philosophy of Hobbes, Rousseau, Hegel, and even Plato. Mussolini's main idea was that fascism is anti-individualist, and that all people should see themselves as incomplete beings whose lives only have meaning and value in service to the all-powerful State. That's not really a corporatist viewpoint. Re: Net censorship, a fascist viewpoint would be that your individual desire to see porn, bomb-making instructions, copyrighted material, or sites about democracy is absolutely meaningless before the State's collective desire to shut you up and make you obey. Not to say that the ISPs are innocent here, but it's not because they own the government.

    --
    Revive the Constitution.