Slashdot Mirror


Fonolo Lets You Bypass Company Phone Menus

An anonymous reader writes "Fonolo, a Toronto based voice 2.0 company, helps you avoid those annoying company phone menus by letting you skip ahead in the company phone system using a process they call 'deep-dialing.' Just search for the company on their website (apparently they have over 500), and you'll see a visual representation of the company's phone system. Then you just select the option you want, put your phone number in, and Fonolo calls the company on your behalf and dials you back when the agent is available — for free. They have a business product that provides this same service (visual dialing), plus virtual queuing and data pass-through." One company creates a phone system designed to encourage you to hang up to save them money. Another creates a phone system designed to make it easy to stay on hold indefinitely. I wonder where this ends.

31 of 171 comments (clear)

  1. Comcast has a service that does the same thing by shoehornjob · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think it's called Comcast 4u or something like that. If there's a large que of calls you get the option to have the company call you back when it's your turn. I can't imagine why more companies don't do this.

    --
    "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    1. Re:Comcast has a service that does the same thing by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Because it costs them money and they don't really want to talk to you?

      Let's be honest here, why would a company want you to call their support line? The only reason the line exists at all is to appease you and keep you from canceling the contract. As far as any company is concerned, whether you can use their product or you cannot does only matter insofar as you don't cancel the contract. So you on hold is you not canceling.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Comcast has a service that does the same thing by Machtyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You've answered your own question: Why don't more companies do this? Because they want to keep you from canceling the contract. But your point is valid, there may not be a cost benefit between making call backs and losing customers.

    3. Re:Comcast has a service that does the same thing by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sometimes a good, old-fashioned, letter is what it takes.

      Specifically, I've found that sending the relevant CEO a list of my service requests, along with photographs of his family and maps showing the routes that they commonly take during their respective daily routines(just to show that I, too, value my relationship with the $FOOCORP family), really improves responsiveness.

      Often, the response is so fast that the service techs arrive before the cops do!

    4. Re:Comcast has a service that does the same thing by shaiberger · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hi there, CEO of Fonolo here.

      Great to see all the enthusiasm!

      > I can't imagine why more companies don't do this.

      That's actually a really interesting question. The idea of letting the customer hang up and then get a call-back when an agent is ready is called "Virtual Queuing" (VQ), and has been around for a long time. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_queuing.

      Why don't we see it more often? It is not for lack of interest, as some of the comments have said. There has been strong interest in VQ for a long time. Waiting on hold is actually lose-lose approach to queuing: Customers get pissed off, and the company wastes money (keeping the lines open). There have been virtual queuing systems available for over a decade. They remain rare, not because companies don't want them but because they require installation at the call center and, in today's call center environment, that's costly and often impossible. Why impossible? Because of the widespread use of outsourced call centers. If you're sending some of your calls to a 3rd party, you can't force them to install any custom equipment. For more on this: http://www.shaiberger.com/2010/10/when-will-we-stop-waiting-on-hold

      Brief plug: Fonolo offers a service that allows companies to add virtual queuing without any changes to their call center. http://fonolo.com/features/virtualqueuing

      - Shai

    5. Re:Comcast has a service that does the same thing by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2

      I have a small request. In the summary, your company is referred to as a "voice 2.0" company. Could you guys please refrain from using terms like that? It comes across as a little "douchey". Thanks.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  2. Please listen by Machtyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Please listen to the menu options as they have recently changed."

    Yeah, right! When was the last time you recently changed them? Oh, listen, I haven't called company X in over a year, but their menu system has not recently changed, it's been the same for so many years!

    1. Re:Please listen by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

      It was recently changed when they added that message. It was then changed when they removed the message, so they had to add it again for accuracy?

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    2. Re:Please listen by Malc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not as bad as the: "we apologise for the delay but we are experiencing higher than usual call volume." Some companies have that message for years, which just means they haven't bothered hiring enough people to answer the phones.

    3. Re:Please listen by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Press 4 to hear a duck quack

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Please listen by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      Press 44 to hear an echo of a duck quack.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    5. Re:Please listen by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      People who work for liars should know who they work for. And they have a choice, they can quit or request that the message be changed to something more reasonable ...

      We're experiencing a high volume of calls right now, and there is a delay in processing your call. We value your business and if you please hold we will get to your call as soon as possible. You are #3 in the queue. You may want to call back during the hours of 6:30 am and 8:30 am EST or between 8:00 pm and 12:00am EST when call volumes are much lower

      That is not a lie. It presents the more information and allows the customer to call back at a time that doesn't have high volumes.

      These companies have metrics, they know call volumes and times. They should value their customers. When companies stop valuing customers, it is a sign that they don't understand their business.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  3. I hate Shaw.ca by grub · · Score: 3, Informative


    I called shaw.ca about my business account. After waiting for over 20 minutes a call center drone answered. Gave all my info then he asked for my business PIN. Huh? So he said he'd mail it to me and it would arrive within 5 minutes. "Can you wait for me to get it?" "NO, so, sorry, we're not allowed to wait." "So I have to wait 5 minutes then wait another 20 on hold at Shaw?"

    I guess he didn't like that because the PIN never did arrive. Fuckers, I HATE SHAW.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:I hate Shaw.ca by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Shaw, Rogers, Telus. What do they have in common? They're all Canuck companies that suck beaver balls.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  4. Re:do people really hate IVR systems? by Phleg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But they don't. I've not once been sent to somebody who can't help me by dialling "0" repeatedly or repeating "operator" to the voice recognition system. Not to mention, it's infinitely frustrating when they make me waste a half hour dialling in identifying numbers, my address, etc., only for the CSR to ask for the exact same information the second they pick up the phone.

    --
    No comment.
  5. Voice 2.0? by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Funny

    What the hell is a "voice 2.0 company"? Do I need to pay some type of a voice maintenance package to upgrade to voice 2.0? Where there any point releases to patch my voice 1.0 company that fixed bugs or maybe had some trivial new feature?

    With 135 years between releases 1.0 and 2.0, they probably should speed up the release cycle some. Hopefully they don't pull a Mozilla and come out with voice 3.0 in three months and immediately EOL voice 2.0.

    1. Re:Voice 2.0? by snspdaarf · · Score: 2

      Paul uses Voice 1.0, but Leto II uses Voice 2.0

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
  6. Re:do people really hate IVR systems? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2

    Phone the sales department. You'll find that they have a very short waiting time, often instant. Get them to transfer you.

    In the UK, try http://www.saynoto0870.com/ and put in the support number, or company name. Often you can get local call numbers for premium rate lines, or direct office numbers bypassing the switchboard.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  7. Easy Solution by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Asterisk Reverse Hold! You call them up and then put them on hold through your Asterisk system. It parks the call and plays a loop telling them not to hang up and to dial a number when you come off hold. Then it makes your phone ring and connects the call. Genius! And if they want to leave you on hold for a month, that's fine. At least as long as you come in through their 800 number...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Easy Solution by praxis · · Score: 2

      You honestly can't wait 15 seconds to speak to someone that didn't want to listen to your muzak for 30 minutes, but yet you expect them to wait the 30 minutes? They're sitting blocked for those 30 minutes, while you are servicing other callers. It's a wasteful system. Solutions that take one member of pool A (customers) and one member of pool B (support) and put them in a non-blocking queue until one of each is ready and then connects them shortly are ideal solutions. Had the company you work for had the same goals in mind, they'd have implemented that system. They hadn't, so the caller is being smart and making a make-shift version of it. Apparently though, you prefer the status quo (blocking the customer in favor of keeping your latency metric low for yourself).

      15 seconds and you could make the world a better place. I'm sorry you drank the coolaid, though I know why you did (performance reviews).

  8. Re:do people really hate IVR systems? by Inda · · Score: 2

    I have a colleague who puts these calls on loudspeaker. He happily keys in his credit card number, bank account number, DoB and all the rest. I've even heard him spell out his address to the operator.

    Should I warn him or just kept recording?

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  9. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  10. Re:For free? by shaiberger · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hi there, CEO of Fonolo here.

    Our consumer service is offered completely for free.

    We make money from our enterprise product which you can read about at http://fonolo.com/

    Why do we offer the free service?
    1) It promotes what we're doing (especially when we get slashdotted!)
    2) It showcases our technology (the engine that runs the consumer service is also at the heart of the enterprise product)
    3) It lets us try new features and learn about the best way to improve the call center experience.
    4) We wanted it for ourselves!

    - Shai

  11. How Original by Seumas · · Score: 2

    I've been using lucyphone.com to do this for a couple years, now.

    1. Re:How Original by vrmlguy · · Score: 2

      Mod parent up! I downloaded the Lucyphone app on my iPhone, and it's a life saver. Like Fonolo, Lucyphone is free; I suspect they make money by providing some service to the companies you call. As someone one said, if you aren't the person paying for something, then you're the thing someone else *is* paying for.

      One minor quibble: Lucyphone needs you to navigate the phone tree, but once you get the message asking you to wait for the next available operator, you just hit the button and go about your normal business. There's only been a couple of times that the rep hung up on Lucy before I could get on the line, and you can be sure I let the company know about it.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  12. Re:do people really hate IVR systems? by Fnord666 · · Score: 2

    I also find it frustrating that I take the time to enter my account number and am asked for it again by a real person. I always ask at this point why I was asked to enter it in the first place, or if they don't already have that information forwarded to them on their screen. I think they sometimes just ask us to be annoying. Maybe not. Maybe the company has a communication system that only does part of its job.

    Entering this data is so that your call can be placed properly in the queue. Some customers have priority status and when they enter their number, they go to the front of the queue or even to a "high value customer CSR". The information is typically not passed to the CSR's system when the call is finally dispatched.

    --
    'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  13. Simple solution to annoying phone menus by jimicus · · Score: 2

    I have discovered a remarkably effective solution to annoying phone menus.

    I can type up a reasonably professional looking letter in about 5-8 minutes. 10 if it's a complicated issue. It takes me another 3-4 minutes to walk to the letterbox and 3-4 minutes to walk back.

    While I am doing this, I do not have to sit listening to Greensleeves played by a six year old with a stylophone.

    IOW, I can get a letter written, printed, stamped and posted in less time than I'm likely to spend on hold with many of these organisations with complicated phone systems. And with considerably fewer grey hairs.

    It's unusual to have to deal with something so urgently that it can't wait a few days, and most companies will put a reasonably smart team on to answering letters - frequently people with more pull, certainly people who are more likely to give you an intelligent answer or route your letter to someone who can. Email doesn't seem to have the same effect.

    I can't quite believe I'm saying this in these days where we can send enormous quantities of information to the other side of the world in a matter of seconds, but letter writing is the way forward.

  14. Re:do people really hate IVR systems? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 2

    As I see it there are two types of IVR systems. Those systems that efficiently route you to a person or an automated task, and there are those systems that hide the CSRs way at the back and force you to wade through endless lists of "is this your issue?" menu options, with the hopes that somewhere buried within there will be an automated answer so they don't have to pay a CSR to handle your call. I hate the later, and I doubt I'm alone.

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  15. Re:do people really hate IVR systems? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    Sears is between incompetence and evil. We bought an air conditioner from a Sears store. I bought it a little late in the season and used it for one season. The following season I went to hook it up a few weeks earlier. It's good I did, because it failed to work. I'd actually taken the unit out of the window and stored it inside for the winter, so it had been ideally protected.

    Sears sent a tech out a few days later without any parts. After decomposing the unit he decided the fault was in the control board. We had to wait for the parts to be shipped to our address and then schedule a tech revisit. Meanwhile we went through several days of temperatures over 100 degrees. Sears sent the wrong part. Then they sent another board, the right one, which didn't fix the problem with another tech visit.

    All this had gone on so long that we were now past the warranty period of one year, but of course I had called them within the month. So we called back on the advice of the technician to get the unit replaced because he had failed to achieve anything, and they told us they couldn't help us because it had been longer than a year and our information had been purged from their system. As you can imagine this was not what we wanted to hear. My lady then spent three hours on the phone yelling at various people before we could get a replacement lined up.

    Naturally Sears had "discontinued" our model, and although they had an identical model with a new model number they "couldn't" manage to get it into the store. As a result, we ended up with yet another unit. In order to get it we had to take the old unit to the store, pick out the new unit, go home, and come back in 24 hours after the swap was approved. The only unit they had in the store was a substantially different shape, so I had to make a new window block for the remainder, and it is also significantly less efficient. Not only does it say it draws more power, but our bill went up noticeably.

    On top of that, this unit made a horrible squeaking noise when it ran. As it turned out, it is a miserable piece of shit. Its innards consist mostly of three pieces of styrofoam which are free to rub against each other and squeak like mexican takeout coming home on a bumpy road. Two of them are taped together, but so sloppy that they squeak anyway. I decased the unit and put them together with wood glue, then added more foam tape where the styrofoam was rubbing the case enclosure, and now it sounds normal.

    My last run-in with Sears was over a primer bulb for a weedwhacker. I went in to the parts depot and asked about it and was told that it would be over twenty dollars for the part, plus shipping. Though Sears has their own interstate trucking network, they wanted me to overpay for USPS to ship a sub-one-ounce part. I ended up at a place called Powered Outdoor Equipment which sold me the original (branded) Walbro part for five bucks, in stock.

    Fuck Sears and all they stand for.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  17. You wonder where this ends? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

    From the summary:

    One company creates a phone system designed to encourage you to hang up to save them money. Another creates a phone system designed to make it easy to stay on hold indefinitely. I wonder where this ends.

    Well, I suppose it ends with a company that creates a computer system that actually does the talking for you. Both ends of the conversation hire the company and then ... Skynet?

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.