Slashdot Mirror


Power Grid Change May Disrupt Clocks

hawguy writes with an AP story about upcoming tests of greater allowed variation in the frequency of the current carried on the U.S. electric grid: "A yearlong experiment with the nation's electric grid could mess up traffic lights, security systems and some computers — and make plug-in clocks and appliances like programmable coffeemakers run up to 20 minutes fast."

55 of 439 comments (clear)

  1. "Clocks" by jra · · Score: 2, Informative

    Clearly, whomever thought this was a Pretty Neat Idea hasn't read this:

    http://yarchive.net/car/rv/generator_synchronization.html

    and doesn't understand what happens when you're even a bunch of *degrees* out of sync, much less a few decihertz. We don't have *near* enough HVDC intertie to make this not matter, and I can't imaging how they think this is gonna work -- nothing at all on NERC's website to say what's *really* gonna happen, either.

    Love all the warning, too.

    1. Re:"Clocks" by gottabeme · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Who" would be correct.

      It will be a sad day when no one cares enough about language and communication to politely correct someone's grammar mistakes, and when those who try are shouted down by an angry, ignorant mob who are so insecure that they can't handle simple mistakes being pointed out.

      Oh, wait...

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    2. Re:"Clocks" by hawguy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Clearly, whomever thought this was a Pretty Neat Idea hasn't read this:

      http://yarchive.net/car/rv/generator_synchronization.html

      and doesn't understand what happens when you're even a bunch of *degrees* out of sync, much less a few decihertz. We don't have *near* enough HVDC intertie to make this not matter, and I can't imaging how they think this is gonna work -- nothing at all on NERC's website to say what's *really* gonna happen, either.

      Love all the warning, too.

      I think the organization that's responsible for the reliability of the entire USA power grid has some idea of the need for frequency stabilization when connecting new power sources to the grid. Not that it's relevant for what they are proposing - power plants already know how to sync up their generators to the grid and they don't care if it's 60.001 Hz or 60.002 Hz, they'll take that into account.

      The magnitude of this frequency deviation is tiny, 20 minutes/year is about .003% - the power grid can fluctuate much more than than on a daily basis, but until now, it's always been corrected to keep the overall frequency at 60 Hz.

    3. Re:"Clocks" by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Believe it or not, the engineers that operate the network actually know what they are doing.

      The flow of power between tied AC networks is determined by phase, not voltage. To adjust the phase between your generator and that of a neighbor to whom you wish to send power you must run faster than he for long enough to accumulate the desired phase difference. Such adjustments are going on constantly throughout the network and conflict with the requirement to keep the average frequency at exactly 60Hz. Relaxing the latter requirement will make network operations easier and more reliable.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    4. Re:"Clocks" by gottabeme · · Score: 3, Funny

      The word you're looking for is "nitpick".

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    5. Re:"Clocks" by jpmorgan · · Score: 3, Informative

      The US operates three separate power grids: the east interconnect, the west interconnect and ERCOT. They're only connected by DC links and are not phase locked.

    6. Re:"Clocks" by jpmorgan · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're telling me that an Internet denizen who's only been exposed to this idea for 5 minutes doesn't know more than the engineers who have been running the system for decades?

      That goes against everything /. stands for!

    7. Re:"Clocks" by icebraining · · Score: 2

      Because it's obviously impossible to do both. If only /. supported multiple replies to the same post!

    8. Re:"Clocks" by jd · · Score: 2

      Why? Timing isn't an issue. The drift in phase due to the thermal expansion and contraction of the materials carrying the power is a bit of a nuicense, but using better-grade materials (making behaviour more predictable and more controllable) would solve some of that and substations are quite capable of handling the marginal extra complexity of preventing errors from accumulating.

      The added complexity is needed anyway as virtually every major blackout in history (including all the ones in recent times) have been due to crappy power routing, even crappier signalling of faults and absolutely pathetic to the power of crappy management of what signals are sent. A decent communications infrastructure, together with competent error handling and proper fault-tolerence, is absolutely essential if we're to avoid having the grid toast itself the next time a branch falls or a solar storm hits.

      But if you're going to have that kind of oomph anyway, with all that it would take to make sure the complexity is not itself a weakness in the system, is it seriously too much to ask to add in the necessary analogue hardware to lock the phase at 60 Hz with zero deviation within any sane or rational level of measurement? Hell, if it weren't for the fact that two top analogue engineers have just died (one of a stroke, the other from a car accident), it would be a cakewalk to make it zero deviation within assorted insane levels of measurement. As it is, it's merely difficult enough to be interesting.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    9. Re:"Clocks" by russotto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and doesn't understand what happens when you're even a bunch of *degrees* out of sync, much less a few decihertz.

      They understand very well. This isn't about allowing generators to drift out of sync with each other in the short term. It's about not correcting the long-term variations in the grid as a whole.

      Household clocks and coffeemakers seem unlikely to be a problem. Most of them nowadays aren't synced to house current, but use quartz oscillators. More likely problems would be old systems which have never been replaced because they've never needed to be; traffic light controllers are a reasonable example.

    10. Re:"Clocks" by calidoscope · · Score: 2

      The links convert AC to DC and then back to AC in order to eliminate the synchronous connection. My recollection is that the conversions process was close to 99% efficient. A more recent alternative to DC links is GE's phase shifting transformer which allows transfer of reactive as well as real power.

      --
      A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
    11. Re:"Clocks" by chuckugly · · Score: 2

      It's late and I'm sleepy but I'm having trouble understanding why a traffic controller would care about a drift of 20 seconds per year in time. It's not like the 5 second yellow is gonna be different than it was before by enough to matter.

    12. Re:"Clocks" by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 2

      I find a sentence with incorrect grammar harder to read. I may just not understand it or may misinterpret it. Your computer will do the same when you program it. A basic principle of interface design is not to do something unexpected (like suddenly changing the frequency!).

      This doesn't mean I'm perfect - I merely strive for perfection.

    13. Re:"Clocks" by SharpFang · · Score: 2

      Yes, there are.

      Are they graded for -40~+120 Celsius degrees, variable humidity, high EMI resistance? Are they guaranteed to retain accuracy in extreme conditions?
      Are they available on common commercially available SBC that have the specific set of features we need as well? Alternatively, do they use one of common protocols like SPI or CAN, without need to add a whole lot of glue logic (both hardware and software) to make them readable from embedded Linux?
      Is the price comparable to, say, a decent GPS-based clock?
      Do they have their own battery backup?
      I guess I could find 10 other obstacles given enough time.

      The problem with "industrial quality" devices where human life depends on correct performance is that "a chip exists" is like 5% of the solution. The chip must play well with the rest, must conform to standards, must either never fail, or always fail gracefully, must not be overly complex to include in existing infrastructure and must not exceed the price and complexity of current work-around (in our case - RS232-based GPS). And the clocks in our boards work very well in room temperature. It's during the coldest winter or hottest summer when they begin to drift. ...also, standalone controllers are increasingly rare occurrence and all the networked ones simply grab time from NTP. There's little point to include a "better" solution that will likely cost more to develop and implement than it would ever return in sales. Nope, current RTC solution is -sufficient-.

      But still, this is not graceful, to have two separate clock sources, one for daytime, another for clock cycle, out of sync with each other. The -right- solution would be to use grid clock and only use on-board RTC during rare power failures. Unfortunately, grid clock sucks, and that was my point.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  2. here's the scale by Flyerman · · Score: 4, Informative

    20 minutes fast over the course of a year.

    1. Re:here's the scale by isorox · · Score: 2

      20 minutes fast over the course of a year.

      3 seconds a day. But twice a year people manually change the time due to summer time.

    2. Re:here's the scale by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      20 minutes fast over the course of a year.

      Well, that's one possibility.

      Note that they also mention that if frequency averages "just over 60 cycles a second", then "clocks that rely on the grid will gain 14 seconds per day". Which is closer to 85 minutes per year than 20.

      Assuming that 60.00 Hz gives you correct time, then you are gaining 14 seconds per day at 60.01 Hz.

      Which means that 0.1 Hz difference from reference frequency translates to two-plus minutes per day, and about 14 HOURS per year error.

      So, exactly how much frequency variation are they planning on allowing in this test?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    3. Re:here's the scale by toastar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      3 seconds a day. But twice a year people manually change the time due to summer time.

      Wait... You check the accuracy of the minutes when daylight savings comes rather then just hitting the +1 hour button?

    4. Re:here's the scale by blair1q · · Score: 2

      All of my clocks that matter synch themselves every few hours with the nearest WWV signal.

      Many of my other timekeeping devices get their time hack from the net.

      Anything free-running probably only has about a 30-second-per-day accuracy anyway (I don't own any Omegas, yet) and I really don't much care, because picking up a watch you haven't worn in a few months and setting it is part of the point of continuing to own analog technology at a time when I could put a solar-powered, radio-synchronized device on my wrist that will read accurately to the millisecond.

    5. Re:here's the scale by heypete · · Score: 2

      It's really too bad that the WWVB isn't broadcast with a cryptographic signature so that the time signal can not be pirated; Thus allowing public clocks to be updated to a time signal that is verifiability correct. I can't believe anyone still trusts data that isn't cryptographically signed -- Oh well, live and learn.

      Personally, I'd like to see some WWVB-style relays, for better signal strength in buildings and other areas that don't normally get good signal (particularly during the day).

      I know that some places use CDMA radio receivers as a time source for NTP servers, as CDMA signals can penetrate buildings better than GPS and the WWVB signal (it's particularly useful when one can't get roof access) and CDMA spec requires time to be in sync with a very small error (10 microseconds, if I recall correctly, but I'm quite possibly incorrect). Considering how small CDMA radios are, one should be able to make tiny CDMA receivers that get the time sync code from the cellular network.

    6. Re:here's the scale by jd · · Score: 3, Informative

      The PET 3032 (back in 1978), free-running and unsynchronised, was capable of 30-seconds-per-year accuracy on a decent, clean power supply. That was, admittedly, about the absolute limit, but you could do it. A modern computer runs around 4 billion times as many cycles per second. More if you supercool then overclock it. A modern computer also has up to 16 cores per node and fairly typical clusters can have 64 nodes.

      As for analog watches, the high-end mechanical watches you can buy off-the-shelf have a drift of around 1 second per day (30 times better than your estimate and 3 times better than any computer is capable of doing if the power supply will induce 3 seconds a day error). For free-running digital devices, a typical Casio quartz digital watch is around six nines accuracy (0.1 seconds drift a day), no synchronization required. Which means you can actually buy a cheap wristwatch that's 30x more accurate on timing than the best home computer you can get.

      Sorry if I find the incompetence of hardware engineers a little hard to accept, I just prefer standards that, y'know, improve over time, not regress. 3 seconds a day drift is what vintage Swiss watches could do. I prefer modern technology to do better than the stuff that Huygens could do, not merely equal it.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    7. Re:here's the scale by Achra · · Score: 4, Informative

      WWV is weak on the West Coast. My watch sync attempts to sync to WWV every night but it is only successful about one day in three. This was initially frustrating because the device is supposed to adjust for DST but would fail to make the switch because it could not receive the signal on that day. Now the changeover day is different from what is programmed in so it doesn't work anyway.

      Whoever designed that watch did a crummy job. There is a bit in the WWVB packet that tells the clock the current DST status: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WWVB

      I've designed a WWVB nixie clock before, there are definitely some serious design constraints. For starters, the signal is 60khz which is "Longwave". You need a lot of antenna to pull in a longwave signal with any real success. I used a very long loopstick antenna, and even then the antenna is directional, so the direction the clock is oriented _matters_. Additionally, lots of things generate noise (QRM) in these frequencies, so watch out for CRT televisions and computers and (in the case of nixie clocks: high voltage switching supplies and multiplexed nixie tubes ionizing and de-ionizing neon hundreds of times a second). I built this thing because I am a HAM and also into nixie tubes.. but the truth is that WWVB is obsolete. Nowadays, the best way to get accurate time is via GPS. You can buy a GPS module to pull the time from for about $25-$35 to build into your clock.

      But I am sad about this line frequency change.. In the United States, one of the most accurate clock signals is the 60hz power. It's accurate to within about a minute a year at present. That is a LOT more accurate than a standard crystal. TCXO's (calibrated crystals that have temperature sensors in them that dynamically recalibrate for temperature) get to about a few seconds a year when they are brand new and then degrade from there with age. So, the long and the short of it is that if this change happens, and if it is a pretty noticeable hit to my clocks' accuracy, I'll be bodging in little TCXO controlled 60hz sinewave generators into all of my clocks.. :(

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
  3. Wow... by jhoegl · · Score: 2

    Such a small change can have such a big impact.
    I never really thought about how digital clocks keep track of time. This is a very interesting issue.
    Of course, it could also turn into a boon for the industry, having everyone buy a clock that doesnt rely on "power timing".

    1. Re:Wow... by heypete · · Score: 2

      Most digital clocks use a quartz oscillator as their frequency source. The mains power is not directly used for timing.

      The only mains-powered clocks I've seen that use the power frequency as their frequency source tend to be older ones. Perhaps there's some modern ones that use it, but I've not seen any.

    2. Re:Wow... by blair1q · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Any clock with the word "quartz" associated with it is using a crystal timebase to determine how long a second, minute, hour, day, etc. are.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quartz_clock#Accuracy

      Half a second per day, even if the power goes out and you're running off a battery, no matter if the mains frequency wobbles (which it's designed to do anyway).

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utility_frequency#Stability

    3. Re:Wow... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

      Even quartz-crystal line-powered clocks use the line for reference and the crystal for backup during power outages.

      The line frequency has been kept stable by comparing it to the national standard clock and adjusting it when it has accumulated small errors. This makes it far more stable than any inexpensive quartz crystal with no oven.

      A one part-per-million crystal oscillator will accumulate over half a minute of error per year. The power grid has been good for a fraction of a second in the time since it was constructed by Tesla and Westinghouse. (Accurate time distribution and cheap clocks was one of its selling points back during the AC-DC wars with Edison.)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    4. Re:Wow... by EvanED · · Score: 2

      The only mains-powered clocks I've seen that use the power frequency as their frequency source tend to be older ones. Perhaps there's some modern ones that use it, but I've not seen any.

      The thinkgeek binary clock does, or at least did. My copy has a button that you have to hold down when you plug it in if your mains are 50 Hz instead of 60. (The thinkgeek page now says that it autosenses 50 or 60 hz.)

  4. Greater Variation = Lower Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "greater allowed variation in the frequency of the current carried on the U.S. electric grid"

    This is marketing speak for lower quality electricity.

  5. Electric clocks by JohannesJ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most clocks are not electric .Most Run on DC provided by a Crystal oscillator, the line frequency provided by the AC line to run them is irrelevant. only electromechanical electric clocks might be in error

    1. Re:Electric clocks by hjf · · Score: 2

      And what makes you think that? The fact that it's 2011 and it's all microcontrolled now?

      Go buy a brand new LED alarm clock. You will find it strangely similar to the one your dad (or grandpa, or you), had in the 1980s. Big LED display, snooze button, 9V battery compartment. Let me know if you find a crystal inside of those. You will find an LM8560 or one of its clones, and a wire from one of the transformer's legs through a diode to one of the chip's pins. Guess what?

  6. Re:Nevermind cheapo clocks by heypete · · Score: 3, Informative

    If your laptop power supply is anything like all the ones I've owned, it won't care. According to the label (and testing done while I travel), mine works just fine on nominally 50-60Hz mains power. I imagine it wouldn't really care if you went from 45-65Hz, though I suspect it might get a bit annoyed if you were to go to 400Hz or something extreme.

  7. Re:Nevermind cheapo clocks by IonOtter · · Score: 2

    When I was with the Military Sealift Command, all the "salty dogs" told me to invest, quite specifically, in a small UPS for my stateroom. They were quite adamant about never plugging your electronic gear straight into the outlets.

    The first time I saw the overhead lights doing Saturday Night Fever, I was grateful for the advice. All my gear survived.

    --
    [End Of Line]
  8. Turntable strobe light by DVega · · Score: 2

    Say goodbye to turntable strobe lights

    --
    MOD THE CHILD UP!
  9. Re:Nevermind cheapo clocks by ls671 · · Score: 2

    I would say you fears are unjustified, most laptop can run fine on 85 to 140 volts and from 50 Hz to 70 Hz while on grid power.

    On the other hand, cheap alarm clocks rely on 60 HZ to keep time accurately, voltage may vary quite a bit without impact. They count 1 second at every 60 power inversion.

    I have noticed that a very long time ago while working up north. We were on generator power and the generator often ran at 61 to 65 HZ and our cheap clocks would run out of sync.

    Clocks with a crystal like computer or laptop clocks aren't affected.

     

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  10. The real question by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The real question is why do devices add the additional circuitry to count pulses off the mains grid rather than add additional circuitry to actually keep time?

    A highly accurate crystal costs in the order for $1 for single quantities. A RTC $1-10 depending on feature set. If you already have a microcontroller you don't need the RTC either. Why are clocks etc reliant on an external signal to keep time? How do they keep time when they run on the battery which is a common backup for every $5 alarm you get?

    As for streetlights ... Really? How is this not a system which gets timing from some other central authority. I don't know much about street lights, but is this something that will only affect old small town streetlights, or do the shiny new modern LED powered ones in the city act independently enough that they aren't capable of contacting an NTP server?

    1. Re:The real question by F.Ultra · · Score: 2

      I guess that this is an US issue since you guys run a 60Hz grid, getting a correct sync from the European 50Hz is probably harder/more exensive than using a crystal because all the clocks that I have seen over here use quartz crystals to keep the time.

    2. Re:The real question by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Informative

      A highly accurate crystal costs in the order for $1 for single quantities.

      And gains or loses perhaps a minute per year - while the grid has been good for a fraction of a second (adjusted when the powerhouse clocks drift more than that from the national standard committee of atomic clocks).

      So that's why line-powered clocks use the line for the primary reference and the crystal oscillator to avoid having to reset it after a power failure (and to insure you get your wake-up alarm). And why most appliances don't bother with a crystal at all. (Why spend extra to make them LESS accurate?)

      Keeping accurate time is HARD. Distributing it by the power grid is EASY.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    3. Re:The real question by Announcer · · Score: 2

      You said, "...why do devices add the additional circuitry to count pulses off the mains grid rather than add additional circuitry to actually keep time?"

      Because adding a SINGLE RESISTOR from the power transformer to a pin on the clock chip is far cheaper than a quartz crystal and load/calibrating capacitors. Follow the money. When you're making a million units, even a few pennies, each, adds up to some big dollars.

      --
      Willie...
  11. Analog clocks by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2

    When the public power grid was being established, a clock manufacturer petitioned successfully to have the mains time kept in perfect 60 Hz synchrony for clocks to keep time off of. This was viewed by everyone as a Big Win. After that, all you needed to make a clock was an AC motor; really nobody needed to actually bother with a real clock anymore except the people at the power station, so "the grid was the clock" the way "the network is the computer".

  12. Re:Nevermind cheapo clocks by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

    > cheap alarm clocks rely on 60 HZ to keep time accurately

    Um, I think you need to narrow that down to "cheap electromechanical alarm clocks", unless I've seriously overlooked something, "Cheap" alarm clocks (from China, in particular, as though the distinction even matters anymore) now basically consist of a backlit LCD module glued to a piece of plastic, with piezo buzzer for the alarm itself. The really, *really* hardcore-cheap ones don't even plug in -- they just ship with a coin cell, and aren't backlit (or make you press a button to light them up, like a 1970s wrist watch in reverse). The grand prize goes to one I saw ripped apart online that dispensed with the diode bridge, and wired up the sidelight LEDs to do double-duty as both nighttime illumination AND rectifiers. I vaguely remember seeing old-fashioned electric alarm clocks somewhere like Wal-Mart or Walgreens for a few bucks 5-10 years ago, but I think value-engineered LCD alarm clocks shoved them aside quite a while ago.

  13. Re:Not going to effect me by Zorque · · Score: 2

    Cool, meanwhile this issue will potentially affect tens or hundreds of millions of people.

  14. Re:What about old analog tvs by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 2

    Older B/W tv sets used 60 Hz as the vertical sync frequency, But the receiver synchronizes itself to the incoming TV signal, not the local powerline. The master synch signal source at the transmitter was a high-stability quartz oscillator, which generated the synchronizing signals for all the cameras and other studio equipment, as well as the transmitted sync signals.

    When color came along, the vertical sync frequency shifted ever so slightly, to 59.97Hz (and the horizontal shifted from 15.75 kHz to 15.734 kHz). These frequencies prevented interference issues with the newly added color components of the transmitted signal, while still being within the working range of the existing B/W sets, allowing older sets to receive color programs in B/W.

    Under some conditions, it was possible for 60Hz powerline noise to somehow couple into a color TV signal, and it would appear as a horizontal "hum bar" across the screen, which would slowly "crawl" up the screen due to the slight difference between the vertical scan rate and the powerline frequency.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  15. You're SO wrong. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So untrue. Maybe it was done that way in 1930. But not anymore.

    You're wrong.

    Line powered clocks with crystal oscillators generally use the line for the reference and the crystal for a backup during power failures.

    The line has been far more accurate than a cheap crystal - at least until these goons implement their harebrained scheme.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:You're SO wrong. by hjf · · Score: 2

      I'm sure you or your dad or someone in your family had a LED alarm clock somewhere. Probably you even have one now. Take it apart, and show me where the crystal is. Nowhere. Google for LM8560, and stop assuming things.

      And yes, they still make those clocks. ANY LED alarm clock you buy now WILL have that chip. And no crystal.

  16. Re:60 Hz timebase vs crystal by Announcer · · Score: 2

    For the El Cheapo clocks, it's less expensive to couple the 60Hz from the power transformer, thru a resistor, into a pin on the clock IC, than to provide a quartz crystal & capacitors to said chip. Even if it's only a difference of $0.10 for each unit, multiply that by millions. Remember, just follow the money. Cheaper = more profit.

    --
    Willie...
  17. Re:WHY? by jpmorgan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Load on the grid shows up as mechanical resistance to the big spinning generators that control the frequency. If there is more load than generated supply, the generators slow and the frequency drops; more supply than load and the turbines spin the generators faster. Maintaining a balance of power is done by keeping the frequency at 60Hz.

    That was easy enough when all power came from big generators, with predictable loads. But if you mandate photovoltaics and wind and other forms of power which vary in output, then things are a lot harder. The wind dies and a major wind farm drops a few hundred megawatts? The big generators can't respond quickly enough to keep frequency within its regulated range, so power companies have to install very expensive systems that can react faster.

    Utilities are often legally mandated to buy power from renewable sources, but those renewable sources aren't held to any of the grid stability requirements. This ends up shifting an enormous burden of cost onto the utilities, who aren't happy with it. Loosening the grid frequency requirements is a way to make renewable but unreliable power less expensive.

  18. Using the mains as a timebase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the 70's I developed a system to control the of the light sensitive coating onto 35mm rolls of film. This ran on a PDP-11 that used the mains cycle to keep time (20ms interupts with the UK's 50Hz supply) and measured the coating by the amount of x-rays reflected by the silver halide in the coating each second.... there were coninual errors in the accuracy of the coating as the time approached midnight.

    It turns out that the National Grid was legally required to maintain a 50Hz average from midnight to midnight and would add or subtract cycles in the last minutes of the day in order to meet this requirement.

    Five or so years later I was working in the National Grid Control Centre and saw the 2 clocks, one with an independent time source and one running from the mains frequency. The aim of the controllers each night was to adjust the mains frequency to bring the two clocks in sync at midnight.

  19. Re:Is timekeeping really that difficult to solve? by swalve · · Score: 2

    Ha! Worse yet, I've seen a hybrid mechanical electric clock. In old buildings, they used to have pneumatic clocks. Instead of each clock having an expensive motor in it, a master clock would have the motor, and put out a puff of air into tubes, which all the slave clocks would use to increment their time by a minute. So anyway, these old clocks were neat looking, and a dude I met one time had a couple. But the master clocks were hard to get, or still installed in the building. So, found a synchronous motor and built a gear and bellows system that would power his slave clocks.

  20. Re:Is timekeeping really that difficult to solve? by number11 · · Score: 2

    I work in electronics and never in my life have I seen a clock that works like this. Ive been dismantling old equipment since I could hold a screwdiver. 35 years

    Wow. So you've never seen a "classic" alarm clock, analog clock with time-set knobs on the back and usually a plunger on the back that you push in or pull out to shut up/arm the annoying buzzer? Never seen electric timer, a little box that plugs into the outlet that you plug something else into, has a big round wheel with mechanical detents that you use to set the trip times? Never seen a timing motor like is in the control unit of older washing machines, a little synchronous motor that's geared to run at a particular speed? I'm not sure if they still make analog alarm clocks (these days quartz is probably cheaper, though I defy you to find a quartz alarm clock that will still function perfectly after 50 years of operation). But they still make timers (Intermatic is a common brand, your hardware store probably has them) and timing motors, both of which depend on line frequency.

  21. Not too many analog or power people here I see. by loose+electron · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is no big deal. What they are talking about here is the additive cycles in a day and not worrying about the compensation process for that.

    Some basics:

    Anything connected to the 60Hz power is at 60HZ, You can not connect a 61Hz generator to the grid.
    In addition, when you connect a generator to the grid, you have to adjust its phase, as you bring it on line.
    If the phase angle does not line up you get you get into a "tug of war" between multiple generation sources and that doesn't work.

    The sine wave coming out of one generator has to line up with the other sine waves from the other sine waves from the other generators.

    60 cycles/sec X 60 sec/min X 60 mins/hour X 24 hours/day = 5.184E6 cycle/day

      What the article is talking about is the adjustment of the generating stations on the grid so that at the end of the day you get that exact number of cycles across the grid, not one more not one less. It is "really close" without tweaking but not exact.

    It costs money to do those tweaks, to get the numbers on the money. That tweak right now really doesn't serve much purpose anymore.

    Noting exciting, or interesting here, this is not Y2K nonsense, move along...

    --
    www.effectiveelectrons.com "chips that work" Analog, RF, Mixed Signal
  22. Music by soundguy · · Score: 4, Informative

    They don't specify how much of a frequency swing they are talking about, but I can think of a few legacy items still in use in the music industry that are affected by line frequency.

    1) - The mainstay of every old piano tuner's toolbox is the Conn Strobe Tuner.

    2) - There are still thousands of working Hammond B/C series electric organs in use.

    3) - Lastly let's not forget the audiophiles and their vinyl record turntables.

    In fact anything with a shaded pole induction motor is speed-locked to the line frequency.

    --
    Nothing worthwhile ever happens before noon
  23. Re:Is timekeeping really that difficult to solve? by hjf · · Score: 4, Informative

    No. If you take apart a clock radio with 4x7-segment LED display, chances are that it has a 9v battery compartment at the bottom, and an LM8560 inside. It's an IC that's been used for over 30 years and still in production. No matter how cool, modern looking, flashy blue LED display it is, it has the same IC a brown 1980s clock with red LEDs had. It could be a clone or have a different name, but it is that chip.

    Guess what: it takes voltage from the transformer, before rectification, into one of the pins. It also has another pin to set 50/60Hz operation. And a SHITTY RC circuit for running off battery (useless, it's off several minutes every hour).

    Another thing: most electric things CAN'T be plugged anywhere now. My grey-market XBOX 360 has a 120V power brick (I live in a 220V country). If you live in the USA, take a look at how many electronic stuff at your house doesn't even have a 220/110V switch. The only things you can pretty much plug in anywhere are chargers. Most other stuff either can't, either by design (things with motors or appliances you don't carry around), or by cost (most electronic stuff without a 110/220V switch).

  24. Re:Nevermind cheapo clocks by hjf · · Score: 3, Informative

    LED alarm clocks still use an LM8560. Go buy one, take it apart, and find the ic with the weird pin spacing (not standard 0.1"). That's the same IC that's been in use for over 30 years. And it still runs on mains frequency (it has a pin to select 50/60hz operation).

  25. Re:Alarm Clocks by hjf · · Score: 2

    LM8560. Yes it's me again. Stop assuming things, just because you THINK crystals are commonplace, doesn't mean they're used everywhere. LED Alarm clocks still work with an lm8560

  26. Sweet! by matunos · · Score: 2

    So, I'll get my coffee 20 minutes faster than usual?