Slashdot Mirror


Are Fake Geeks Dooming Real Ones?

mattnyc99 writes "In the wake of the Best Buy 'geek' trademarking and Miss USA calling herself 'a huge history geek,' writer (and self-proclaimed geek) Eryn Green has an interesting piece for Esquire on how so-called 'geek chic' is pervading the culture so much that no one appreciates an actual geek anymore. From the article: 'The difference between brains and beauty is that you're more or less born into good looks — entitled, if you will. Intelligence? That takes work. If the hallmark of real geekiness — of America — is determination, then we seem too determined to have an entitlement problem.'"

18 of 492 comments (clear)

  1. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nobody apart from other geeks has ever appreciated an actual geek.

    1. Re:Nope by suso · · Score: 4, Funny

      Shut up geek.

  2. Nothings changed by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nothings changed, nobody appreciated an actual geek to begin with.

    --
    "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    1. Re:Nothings changed by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They always take that for granted and get pissed at you if you refuse to give them free service. At least, that's been my experience. So no, they don't really appreciate you.

      --
      SSC
    2. Re:Nothings changed by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Funny

      My rate is $350 AU an hour

      I should charge that amount. Just getting Aussie Dollars to pay me with would be enough of a burden that they'd stop asking.

  3. Premise of story is bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    You do realize that "geek" does not mean "computer nerd" right? Calling oneself a "history geek" is perfectly valid.

  4. real geekiness? by cheeks5965 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the hallmark of real geekiness — of America — is determination, then we seem too determined to have an entitlement problem.

    LOLWUT? This statement makes no sense. It sounds like a perversion of a tea party truism. A salute to real American geekiness as our founding fathers envisioned!

    In my mind true geeks apply an overabundance of detailed knowledge to an overly technical project that wouldn't interest the general population. Count me in.

    -sent from my TI-92 graphing calculator.

    --
    -- Flame me and I will happily flame you back. Bring it!
  5. Intelligence by Psychotria · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Intelligence takes work? First I've heard about that. Sure, utilising intelligence to create new things, undertake science, refine and present new ideas, learning, building etc -- they all take work. I.e. it takes work to use your intelligence to its full potential. But I don't think that's the same thing as saying "Intelligence? That takes work".

    1. Re:Intelligence by GSloop · · Score: 4, Informative

      Read Carol Dweck.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carol_Dweck

      In short, there may be some upper limit to raw brain power, but for most, that limit isn't ever reached.

      So, claiming that "intelligence" is some inherent trait and, like most, assuming that failure equals non-intelligence causes a whole range of problems.

      People can sharpen their skills and those skills are usually viewed as intelligence.

      The real rub is this: When kids think they are "intelligent" or not, then nothing they do can impact that inherent trait. They will do all sorts of odd things to avoid failure and being labeled "stupid." [The inverse of intelligent.]

      When they are told they can learn, and that "intelligence" is not a fixed trait, they do much better, and the odd behaviors of attempting to either gain entry into the "intelligent" club, futility of being in the stupid club, or working to avoid losing the "intelligent" club card vanish.

      Read this: [It's from Dweck herself. Her book "Mindset" is an excellent start too.]
      http://web.me.com/dianamadsen/Walden_Webpage/Parent_Resources_files/The%20Perils%20and%20Promise%20of%20Praise.pdf

      Cheers,
      Greg

  6. Are we assuming by Altus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That Miss USA isn't a geek just because she is a girl, or is it because she is attractive?

    I haven't met her myself, but isn't it actually quite possible that she is a history geek?

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    1. Re:Are we assuming by Americano · · Score: 5, Interesting

      isn't a geek just because she's a girl or is it because she is attractive?

      I'm sure there's a little bit of misogyny mixed into these responses, but I think it's mostly because most of the people assuming this imagines that every participant in a beauty pageant is dumb-as-rocks. (See: Miss South Carolina's response about maps & education several years back.)

      Comically, many of the same people who make that assumption will also turn around and express their titanic levels of outrage over being stereotyped when people generalize them based on a comparison with a single data point about the neckbearded computer geek they once knew.

      Having been to a 15-20 pageants as a member of the color guard presenting & retiring the national colors when I was in college, I had the opportunity to meet quite a few pageant participants (and yes, it was pretty great being a 19 year old in uniform surrounded by a bunch of 18-25 year old pageant contestants). Some of them were pretty dumb, and talking to them was tremendously un-fun. Others were quite sharp, and a lot of fun to talk to - quite a few were college students trying to win some scholarship money for school.

  7. You're not born with good looks by BlueParrot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Exercise, diet , makeup, hair removal, clothing, haircuts, healthcare, stress at work / school, sleeping habbits, alcohol , tobacco , dental care, etc ...

    People seriously underestimate how much of a person's appearance is due to lifestyle factors and how much time you are willing to put into it. Yes, there are genetic factors, but frankly there is a heck of a lot of it that can actually be described in terms of effort.

  8. Re:Solution by Altus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And they will explain to you why your non expert test is really not a good way to test if someone is geeky in this particular subject. They will then spend an hour or so providing you with a better set of 10 questions and writing up a multi-page answer for each one.

    That's when you know you are dealing with a geek.

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  9. When I think of the prototypical geek by Missing.Matter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think of someone who is socially awkward, who also has an unnatural, maybe unhealthy knowledge of some subject in depth. Most often it is something on the outskirts of popular culture (Star Trek/Wars, Anime, 14th centuray blacksmithing techniques). I think the later part of my perception is the more important one.... passion for something not too many people really care about. I don't see why you have to be socially awkward to be a geek.

    Personally, I'm well adjusted, good looking, have friends, a girlfriend, no problem performing or public speaking. Yet I program microcontrollers, buy a Kinect (or 3) just to hack it, watch anime, and here I am on Slashdot. I would absolutely consider myself a geek, and I have no problem considering someone a geek just because their unhealthy obsession isn't tech related.

  10. You are basically born with intelligence too by ranton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I always find it odd that smart people think those who work out 10 hours a week, eat carefully, and take effort in upkeeping their appearance are just born with their looks. But then when they are able to breeze through school without studying and learn new things with little effort, that takes real skill.

    I have done alot of tutoring along the years, and have seen people who work alot harder than me struggle on topics that came very naturally for me. I am not conceited enough to think I am successful just because of my hard work, while those who are successful because of "just" their looks had everything handed to them. I have had my fair share of luck too. Almost every very smart person I know (the "actual" geeks the article is mentioning) was largely born with the ability to learn faster than most people. Sure most of them worked hard too, but usually not as hard as the people who struggled through College Algebra.

    The abilities you are born with are also going to primarily determine the areas you work on developing. If you are born athletic, you are more likely to spend effort on physical activities because it will provide you the most immediate payoff. And if you are born with higher intelligence, you will spend more time reading books.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  11. Explained in D&D terms by suso · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok, being a bit more serious. here is what is going on.

    Throughout the age of d20 and now d21 (how would that work?) in the prime material plane at least we've been making the transition from "ruled by braun" to "ruled by brain". In this new age STR, DEX and CON aren't important as they once were and so in this new world that values INT above all else, those that have the CHR, but not the INT have to use some WIS and lie about their character class. Because in the public eye, CHR is always important. Most people don't want to associate with character with low CHR scores, so they take people with a good mix of both and make sure they get to fight the dragon.

    1. Re:Explained in D&D terms by suso · · Score: 4, Funny

      Spelling Nazis, please execute me swiftly with a vorpal long sword +5 for misspelling brawn. I didn't mean ruled by Adolf Hitler's mistress or and electric shaver.

  12. Cut Miss USA some slack by voss · · Score: 4, Informative

    Miss USA was only 1 of 2 contestants in the contest to come out for teaching evolution only, and
    spoke about it correctly referenced the stuart and tudor eras when talking about history,
    talked about her book collection and has come out in favor of gay marriage.

    She may not be a geek in the slashdot tradition but shes geek-friendly and since there is not
    an overabundance of geek friendly smart hot girls I say cut her some slack.