Slashdot Mirror


Wildfire Threatens Los Alamos Labs

1sockchuck writes "A fast-moving wildfire has closed the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), a Department of Energy facility responsible for weapons design and a vast array of research, as well as two of the world's top supercomputers. Lab officials said all radioactive and hazardous material had been accounted for and protected." Adds an anonymous reader: "I live near LANL and apparently they have begun to evacuate the whole town. Here is some information I've received through an email chain: 'Our main concern is that the Las Conchas fire is about 3 1/2 miles from Area G, the dumpsite that has been in operation since the late 1950s/early 1960s. There are 20,000 to 30,000 55-gallons drums of plutonium contaminated waste (containing solvents, chemicals and toxic materials) sitting in fabric tents above ground. These drums are destined for WIPP. ... We understand that LANL has been working since late last night to build a fire line in Water Canyon, between the fire and Area G. ... Over the last 26 hours the fire has grown from 0 acres to about 45,000 acres – about the size of the Cerro Grande fire in 2000."

88 of 134 comments (clear)

  1. The Black Hole by stokessd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Quick! Move all the old junk in "The Black Hole" to a safe location:

    http://www.blackholesurplus.com/

    Sheldon

    1. Re:The Black Hole by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      What an awesome store. Shit like this the only reason I can see for living in the US. So much awesome military surplus stuff. All we get here in Australia are sweaters, shirts and pants.

    2. Re:The Black Hole by Raul654 · · Score: 1

      I worked in Los Alamos a couple years ago and made it a point to get out to the black hole. I was *very* disappointed that they were sold out of Geiger counters, but I did manage to get a machete other small stuff on the cheap.

      --


      To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
      --E.C. Stanton
    3. Re:The Black Hole by Squiddie · · Score: 1

      It's one upside, but like everywhere else, there are things that are just not that great.

  2. ...again by mschaffer · · Score: 2

    It's not the first time, it won't be the last.

    1. Re:...again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How long till someone blames all these fires and all these floods on climate? :/

    2. Re:...again by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2
      "There's been a fire."

      -- Michael Crichton, Andromeda Strain

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    3. Re:...again by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

      Nice troll. Bit obvious though...

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    4. Re:...again by mug+funky · · Score: 2

      well, actually, there's many many documented cases of firefighters starting fires.

      and just as many if not more cases of cigarette butts starting fires - it's no coincidence that so many grass fires start right next to roads. some people are just so callous they should be locked away and the key carelessly forgotten about.

    5. Re:...again by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      No, this fundamentalist wacko is going to blame it on careless smokers.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    6. Re:...again by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the Earth first types burning down new construction and auto dealerships.

      (holy shit, you really owe it to yourself to GIS fire tornado that's ten kinds of awesome. Sadly, adding lightning to the query doesn't improve things much.)

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  3. atoms by mug+funky · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    more scary atoms news?

    would this seriously have made the front page on /. prior to the Japanese Tsunami?

    1. Re:atoms by wmbetts · · Score: 2

      Yeah, if there's a real risk the the Los Almamos Lab then it should be here.

      --
      "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". - stolen from Dan C alt.os.linux.slackware
    2. Re:atoms by carlzum · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Los Alamos, plutonium, and mass evacuation always make for a nerd-worthy story.

  4. Re:Apparently by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    You don't know where Los Alamos is?

    So you don't know where the world's first atomic bomb was developed and built. You need to work on that. Or learn to Google.

  5. More info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is a fire very close to Los Alamos National Laboratory. They have begun to evacuate the whole town. Here is some info from someone on the ground: Our main concern is that the Las Conchas fire is about 3 1/2 miles from Area G, the dumpsite that has been in operation since the late 1950s/early 1960s. There are 20,000 to 30,000 55-gallons drums of plutonium contaminated waste (containing solvents, chemicals and toxic materials) sitting in fabric tents above ground. These drums are destined for WIPP. We understand that LANL has been working since late last night to build a fire line in Water Canyon, between the fire and Area G. Over the last 26 hours the fire has grown from 0 acres to about 45,000 acres – about the size of the Cerro Grande fire in 2000.

    1. Re:More info by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      so would you consider Yucca Mountain a good or bad idea?

    2. Re:More info by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Over the last 26 hours the fire has grown from 0 acres to about 45,000 acres

      At this rate, the entire US will be on fire in about 145 years.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    3. Re:More info by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1

      so would you consider Yucca Mountain a good or bad idea?

      Hush you. Don't you know that anything that helps the nuclear industry in any way, shape or form is automatically Evil(trademark, patent pending)? :)

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    4. Re:More info by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Spill out on an interstate highway? Have you seen the youtube video where they tested the containers they ship this shit in? Hint, it involved being hit square on the side by a locomotive going 60 miles per hour, and there was no damage to the container.

      I'd link it, but the proxy here disallows YouTube.

      The point: they aren't shipping this stuff in a 1/4 inch thick stainless steel milk tanker. They actually built specialized equipment and defined procedures way back when they started planning Yucca Mountain.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    5. Re:More info by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      In fact, here's a lot more information about it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spent_nuclear_fuel_shipping_cask

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  6. Re:Apparently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    From The Fine Article: "The lab is about 35 miles from Santa Fe." Santa Fe is also the capital of New Mexico. If you can't click a link or Google then I won't waste my time to suggest that you to step away from the keyboard pick read a book. It wouldn't have taken much more time than to click the AC box. Pussy.

  7. I Live in New Mexico by DrJimbo · · Score: 4, Informative

    The fire danger has never been higher. Some places make it against the law to even smoke outside. Over the past month there have been days when we've been inundated with smoke from the wildfires in Arizona. It is hot, dry, and windy.

    You would think that selling and setting off fireworks would also be illegal this year (it is usually allowed for a week before and after July 4th, but this hasn't stopped people from lauching fireworks whenever they want to) yet there are huge tents in the parking lots of all the grocery stores selling fireworks. The reason is that in New Mexico there is a state law that makes it illegal for communities to ban the sale and use of fireworks. Instead of working to fix this crazy law, the governor asked New Mexicans to "exercise caution and restraint when it comes to using fireworks."

    Is this a great state or what?

    --
    We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
    -- Anais Nin
    1. Re:I Live in New Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I too, live in New Mexico. Most people I've talked to don't realize how dry it is right now. It has been over 9 months since some parts of the state, like Silver City, have had rain. We are supposed to be in the rainy season right now, but instead we are in the worst drought since the dustbowl. I went camping last weekend and I saw 3 different fires all on my way back to town. It regularly snows ash, and sometimes the city is so covered in smoke it looks like thick fog. The air quality gets so low that you can't go outside. Normally that wouldn't be an issue, but around here, most people have swamp coolers, these devices that cool the outside air via evaporation and pump it inside. It's a really cheap way of cooling your house, but it doesn't filter the air well, so it doesn't really change anything. I regularly feel like I'm not getting enough oxygen. Its a really scary feeling..

    2. Re:I Live in New Mexico by ThorGod · · Score: 1

      I've lived in Los Alamos (and many other parts of NM). I hope Los Alamos makes it through this okay, but it's looking worse and worse.

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    3. Re:I Live in New Mexico by Ironchew · · Score: 1

      Another NMer.

      New Mexico, like much of the sun belt (especially Texas) needs water badly. We can only hope for the seasonal rains to kick in, but precipitation has been pretty crazy in the United States recently. If only there was a way to siphon water out of the Midwest flood plains...
      As for fireworks, I can only hope that the people buying them are merely stocking up for a more opportune time. I certainly hope people think twice before burning our state down.

    4. Re:I Live in New Mexico by Hatta · · Score: 1

      the governor asked New Mexicans to "exercise caution and restraint when it comes to using fireworks."

      And just how many pot smokers do you think he has in prison?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:I Live in New Mexico by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I too, live in New Mexico. Most people I've talked to don't realize how dry it is right now. It has been over 9 months since some parts of the state, like Silver City, have had rain.

      If New Mexico is anything like Los Angeles, fire season starts when there's not been any significant rain for 90 days. By this time, the brush must be like a tinderbox waiting for a spark. I hope you get some rain, RSN.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    6. Re:I Live in New Mexico by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I regularly feel like I'm not getting enough oxygen. Its a really scary feeling.

      Depending on your age and health condition, you might want to invest in a small oximeter and a bottle of medical O2. Better yet, go have a scheduled physical checkup like everyone else.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:I Live in New Mexico by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Is this a great state or what?

      6 times smaller than the neighbouring Texas.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    8. Re:I Live in New Mexico by c0lo · · Score: 1

      The air quality gets so low that you can't go outside

      Is this the cause for which ...

      Some places make it against the law to even smoke outside.

      ?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    9. Re:I Live in New Mexico by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      People who brag about Texas being so big should well consider that if Alaska were divided in two, Texas would be the THIRD biggest state.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    10. Re:I Live in New Mexico by c0lo · · Score: 1

      People who brag about Texas being so big should well consider that if Alaska were divided in two, Texas would be the THIRD biggest state.

      Which will make the comparison of the "greatness" of New Mexico even more unfavourable.

      BTW, "bragging" about the size of Texas - far from my mind - I'm not even living in US.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    11. Re:I Live in New Mexico by physicsphairy · · Score: 1

      You would think that selling and setting off fireworks would also be illegal this year

      Banning the use of fireworks would be the worst idea imaginable. The real problem we have is brush fires starting in remote areas. Banning fireworks == people going to remote areas to try to use them without being caught.

      If you're a local, you should be well aware that the fireworks laws we do have are popularly ignored anyway.

      A better idea would be a public information campaign. A lot of people here who are inclined to shrug at the legal restrictions actually do care about the well-being of their community.

    12. Re:I Live in New Mexico by DrJimbo · · Score: 1

      There is just no way that the dumbed-down, "safe" fireworks allowed to be sold here are going to start a fire in the average neighborhood. And I guess you never thought about standing by with a fire extinguisher when you set some off (I do).

      If everyone acted responsibly in all situations then there would be little need for laws. OTOH, if the irresponsible actions of a few threaten to destroy an entire community then ISTM that those actions should be banned.

      The problem is exacerbated by something like the Dunning Kruger_effect where people who are not responsible don't realize they are not responsible. If children see many "responsible" adults setting off "safe" fireworks in a safe manner some of those children will set off unsafe fireworks in an unsafe manner because they simply don't know any better and don't make the fine distinctions that you do.

      My point was not that we must outlaw everything dangerous. My point was that in this particular situation our laws are out of kilter. For example, there are many laws that are meant to protect me from my own stupidity. Drug laws and seatbelt laws come to mind. Banning the sale and use of fireworks when we are in the most extreme fire danger we've had in many years will protect the many from irresponsible acts of a few.

      ISTM that asking people to use fireworks responsibly is rather ineffective because the people who will heed such as message are already responsible and don't really need the warning. Some irresponsible people won't heed the warning, and will probably think all fireworks are safe since the sale and use of fireworks is allowed. Of course, there will be a few people who will set of unsafe fireworks whether they are banned or not. IMO a complete ban of the use and sale of fireworks during this time of extreme danger sends a simple message to those that need it the most.

      ISTM that your fireworks activities are unlikely to directly cause a fire that would damage your community. But your attitude and the example you set certainly put your community, and mine, at a much greater risk that is totally unnecessary.

      If the risk from your actions was only to your own life and your own house then I would say "party on" but the risk is to the lives and property of everyone, including me. ISTM that my right to life and property trumps your right to set off fireworks at the very worst time of year.

      --
      We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
      -- Anais Nin
  8. It's going to be bad by DesertJazz · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was up in the mountains about 7 miles away when it started... It's ridiculously dry right now, high winds, and high temps. All that's going to be possible is evacuating people. The bad thing is it's going in the opposite direction of the 2000 fire, so there's plenty of fuel. The Bandalier National park has had about half of it's area burned so far as of earlier today. Thoughts and prayers to all who are in its path.

  9. Back in the good old days... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    Back before the damn hippies forced us to can Project Plowshare we would have just dusted off a couple of bits and pieces from the back room and showed that fire what a real man's 'controlled burn' looks like. Kids these days. A few trees catch fire and they run around panicking. In my day, 'threat' meant 50 MIRVed megatons return-addressed 'Ivan', not an overgrown burn pit.

    1. Re:Back in the good old days... by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Sorry mate, that's puny. You'd need about 1500 of those to match what a bush fire can do.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    2. Re:Back in the good old days... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Ok, that's hilarious.

      You win.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  10. Videos of the fire here.... by stinkfoot · · Score: 1
  11. More details by cluening · · Score: 1

    The lab was closed today and will be again tomorrow, and the townsite started voluntary evacuations last night. It turned into a mandatory evacuation this afternoon.

    Luckily, I have some friends to stay with in Santa Fe.

    --
    Posted from the wireless couch.
  12. Nothing to worry about by PPH · · Score: 1, Funny

    They set fires every once in a while to smoke out Chinese spies.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  13. Re:Gaia by steeviant · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's as if Mother Gaia is giving us arrogant humans a lesson about overreaching our abilities. :) Maybe we need to dismantle all nuclear power, and just learn to live with less electricity in general. Think about the first word: reduce, reuse, recycle. Make no mistake: continue abusing the planet and the planet will strike back. Hard.

    Someone's been getting stoned and watching Captain Planet again...

  14. Re:Apparently by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

    GIFY.

    There, FTYF (sic)...

    --
    This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
  15. Oh geee. by unity100 · · Score: 1

    ANOTHER potential disaster threatening a facility with major nuclear equipment ? oh my.

    1. Re:Oh geee. by pz · · Score: 1

      ANOTHER potential disaster threatening a facility with major nuclear equipment ? oh my.

      Show some respect. There's a town full of people around LANL whose lives are being threatened.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    2. Re:Oh geee. by Ltap · · Score: 2

      The point he's trying to make is that the news media in general is trying to capitalize from the furor surrounding the Fukushima incident by focusing on any kind of incident involving nuclear material.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    3. Re:Oh geee. by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      And that isn't a valid concern?

      There's probably a lot more radioactive material at LANL than Fukushima, with a lot less containment.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    4. Re:Oh geee. by Gertlex · · Score: 2, Informative

      Haha. No. (At point 2)

      Fukushima has six reactor cores worth of nuclear material (25000 kg of Uranium per core - example is specifically the 1 GW Westinghouse AP1000 reactor), plus the spent fuel. The weapons program testing stuff has largely been moved to Nevada deserts, from what I've heard. It's not the good ole days of putting two hemispheres of HEU (on the order of several inches diameter) together and counting neutrons... there's minimal material of note in Los Alamos. (That's why we have the super computers that were mentioned.)

      Yes, I work(ed?) at LANL.

      (Point 1 has, IMO, been addressed by the Lab's press release... Not that the media cares.)

    5. Re:Oh geee. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Yeah, next they'll be running around screaming that the largest reactor in our solar system has caught fire.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    6. Re:Oh geee. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Show some respect. There's a town full of people around LANL whose lives are being threatened.

      Show some respect. People lived in the western states for ten thousand years and simply moved their seminomadic existence every time there was a fire. In California in particular they burned their homes down every year to touch off yearly brush fires that would clear the undergrowth and leave the forests standing. Living where those people live in the homes those people live in is fucking stupid and they deserve neither sympathy nor respect. (I'm in a rental right now in the same situation, but I signed the agreement, so I don't deserve them either. Maybe a little more than a homeowner.)

      We put homes in places they don't belong and then cry when they are wiped out when we fail to manage fires correctly, i.e. by preventing them utterly. Then the flammable material stacks up and you get what we have today; a firestorm across multiple states. The people who buy and/or build these homes are THE PROBLEM.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Oh geee. by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      They still make nuclear weapons at LANL. They have plutonium facilities there. There's more radioactive waste material there than just about anywhere else in the world. So, you're wrong, and STFU.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    8. Re:Oh geee. by NatasRevol · · Score: 1
      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    9. Re:Oh geee. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Amen!

      Aside from the issue of "hazardous factories" I agree with your TIC statement; I believe that factories and individuals alike should be responsible for their emissions in essentially every way including overall zero emissions balance, and limits on allowable detectable levels. Otherwise, people should either not live in places which are guaranteed to go through cyclical destruction, or they should be prepared for the fallout, both literal and figurative. I looked at moving to Panama but all the interesting parts are on the sides of volcanos... that's half of the problem with where I live now, so it's no upgrade.

      Of course, if you cut down (or top) any tree capable of falling on your dwelling, and build its exterior from nonflammable materials, then that opens up a lot more area for safe residence. If we don't over-harvest timber so that water runs off quickly and causes landslides (to say nothing of the flora's capacity to help retain the slope) then that does the same. In some places people manage to survive flood season fairly well simply by building on stilts; in a very few places there are now experiments ongoing with floating buildings. But living in a toxic shit shack on a flood plain is irresponsible any time you have a choice.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Oh geee. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between 'make' and 'design'; that's why they have supercomputers for 'testing' in massive physics simulations. Care to provide specific, relevant not-out-of-context quotes from the PDFs in the list you linked to?

  16. Bless our firefighters! by wsxian · · Score: 2

    I live at San Ildefonso Pueblo. Los Alamos National Lab is within our aboriginal land rights/claims. We have "Sacred Areas" that abut Los Alamos. While our geographic aims may diverge, I can think of no other people I would like up at the "Hill" (we are at 5500 feet and Los Alamos is over 7000 feet) than the security forces at Los Alamos as well as the firefighters that have come from all over (including many Native Americans). May the Lord protect them and the fire abate. Excuse me, I must pack in case we need to evacuate....

    1. Re:Bless our firefighters! by jnik · · Score: 1

      Thank you...and thanks to your governments for opening the back road through Rendija again. I bailed to Albuquerque Sunday night; not much to do now but follow the news and hope I have a house when we go back.

    2. Re:Bless our firefighters! by Zty · · Score: 2

      I can't agree more. I've lived on the Hill for about a year. I've never seen anything like the fire coming over the Jemez mountains on Sunday night, and I hope I never do again. The people who rush in to help while the rest of us are getting out are heros. I hope and pray for their safety and success. God Speed to them all! wsxian: It's good to know we have good neighbors. I hope that in the end you don't need to use the bags you're packing.

  17. Re:Gaia by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Right, because clearly -everything- was better in the pre-industrial, pre-scientific age. I mean, who -doesn't- want to die from easily treatable infections, live their lives in darkness and generally live like we did in the 1700s.

    Go ahead and live your life worshiping the earth, no one is stopping you. For the rest of us, it makes a lot more sense to continue to increase our standard of living.

    I can guarantee you that all the natural disasters that happened this year put together has a much smaller death toll than what the death toll would be from life in the pre-industrial, pre-scientific age.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  18. Re:Gaia by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Yeah, we should go back to basics. We don't need all the power-using machinery to provide our modern conveniences. Why look at the ancient Greeks! They lived a lot like we do today (*), without even inventing a practical steam engine, and not for lack of knowledge, either. They just didn't need to, what with all the slaves and all..

    *as long as you weren't a slave. And owned land. And slaves....

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  19. does it worry anyone else by Surt · · Score: 1

    That the "radioactive and hazardous material" had to be accounted for and protected? Shouldn't the statement have read that such materials, as always, were secure?

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    1. Re:does it worry anyone else by ThorGod · · Score: 2

      No. Even if the material hasn't been moved in 50 years and inventory taken yesterday, they've still got to recheck everything before a fire 'blows through'.

      It takes one slack-jawed yokel making the assumption "safe yesterday, safe today" for a serious disaster to turn worse, much worse.

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    2. Re:does it worry anyone else by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      It's the same principle that you use in making sure a gun's unloaded when somebody hands it to you. Just because they just checked it doesn't mean that you don't check it yourself.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    3. Re:does it worry anyone else by Gryle · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I don't work at Los Alamos, but I do work with sensitive government items, and it's bit more than that actually. Government accountability of sensitive* stuff like this isn't a one-and-done. Inventories of sensitive items are done at regular intervals to make sure that what we said was there last week is actually still here this week. If it ain't, we backtrack to find out where the heck it went off to and whose soul to obliterate for not keep track of their stuff.

      *Stuff the US government doesn't want falling into the hands of anyone other than the US government

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    4. Re:does it worry anyone else by Surt · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm talking about the phrasing. Of course they have to double-check, but their release sounds more like they fixed major problems.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  20. Re:Gaia by Roachie · · Score: 1

    You would not want to live in a world where "Mother Gaia" is given priority over human needs. Most of your ancestors did not have a choice between scarcity or abundance- I imagine many of them did not live to your age. They were welcomed back to the bosom of "Mother Gaia".

    Nature does not care about you or me. Your benefactors are our fellow wo/man. They are the ones that saw that you survived your birth, they are the ones who fill your belly every day. They are the ones who build that excellent shelters we live in, complete with hot or cold air, depending on your preference, clean water and 52' flat screen porn on demand.

    "Mother Gaia" pffft! We all we got.

    --
    This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
  21. Re:Gaia by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    Was I the only one rooting for the polluters on that show? I think it was the whiny little "heart" punk that did it for me, every week I just hoped one of the bad guys would bury that little twerp in toxic waste or plutonium or something.

    as for TFA, what's the odds this waste can blow up? I'm not talking nuclear China syndrome kinda blow up, but I'm betting plenty of those chemicals are also flammable. Radioactive smoke and chemical fires don't sound too good. So anybody know if what they stored there is at risk of going boom?

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  22. Re:Gaia by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I mean, who -doesn't- want to die from easily treatable infections, live their lives in darkness and generally live like we did in the 1700s.

    Wow! Way to use a false dichotomy! Nice bit of black and white thinking! I am impressed with your stunning rhetorical skills and wish to subscribe to your newsletter! How about putting 2% of our resources towards cleaning things up? I'm pretty sure that this would not cause us to "live like we did in the 1700s". After that, we're just arguing about the percentage - which is probably why you don't want to have the discussion.

    --
    That is all.
  23. Re:Gaia by cheater512 · · Score: 1

    You try it first and we'll watch how you go.

  24. Re:Apparently by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "You need to work on that. Or learn to Google."

    Thanks, I just did.
    http://www.google.lu/search?q=%22Los+Alamos%22+stolen

    Security must be awesome there.

  25. Re:Gaia by steeviant · · Score: 1

    Was I the only one rooting for the polluters on that show? I think it was the whiny little "heart" punk that did it for me, every week I just hoped one of the bad guys would bury that little twerp in toxic waste or plutonium or something.

    I was pretty annoyed by the way that faceless evil corporations are polluting the world while everyone else is trying to clean it up, when the reality is that the pollution exists because of the rampant consumerism that people love so much (myself included).

    "It's not me, it's the other end of the supply chain"

    as for TFA, what's the odds this waste can blow up? I'm not talking nuclear China syndrome kinda blow up, but I'm betting plenty of those chemicals are also flammable. Radioactive smoke and chemical fires don't sound too good. So anybody know if what they stored there is at risk of going boom?

    It doesn't have to go boom to be really, really bad. Just poof!

    Inhaled plutonium has a habit of causing lung cancers, plutonium laced ash settling on food crops or preparation surfaces can cause gut cancers, and then there's plutonium's nasty habit of accumulating in bone marrow, so if there is anything containing plutonium that can burn or boil it could cause some pretty toxic fallout.

    We can take comfort in the fact that the waste in question is being stored outside, above ground, in tents; which suggests that it's probably not very likely that any highly radioactive waste is at risk -tents not being renowned for their security or radiological enclosure qualities.

  26. So what you're saying is... by SheeEttin · · Score: 1

    So what you're saying is... These fires were set by some pyro to check for spies?

  27. Re:Gaia by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    Has it ever occurred to you that that's how Gaia keeps her human population at sustainable levels? Remove the limits to growth, and population explodes. The planet is for every living being, not just humans. Technology just makes a bad problem worse. We need fewer humans and less electricity. It's a tough problem. Maybe we could put sterilization pills in children's vaccinations, or something. That way, they have to get the vaccine in order to go to school, and by the time they get to reproductive age it's already too late. Don't get the vaccinations, and you catch a children's communicable disease and die without reproducing. Gaia can be a harsh mistress if you abuse her.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  28. Re:Gaia by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1

    I was pretty annoyed by the way that faceless evil corporations are polluting the world while everyone else is trying to clean it up, when the reality is that the pollution exists because of the rampant consumerism that people love so much (myself included).

    "It's not me, it's the other end of the supply chain"

    Don't forget also that they weren't just polluting while everyone else was trying to clean it up, they were polluting almost purely because they were evil. They weren't producing pollution as a byproduct. It was their product and they were just looking for the most evil way to dump it. I'm half surprised they didn't have the evil corporations fill puppies with the pollution and then stuff them down dolphin throats while kicking kittens.

    --
    I was raised on the command line, bitch

    "Nemo me impune lacesset"

  29. Re:Gaia by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    It's as if Mother Gaia is giving us arrogant humans a lesson about overreaching our abilities.
    Oh yeah? Well, your mother's so fat, her belt size is Equator!

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  30. Re:Gaia by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    The point being that you can only push the ecosystem so far before its degradation starts having an adverse effect on you.

    Yeah, but that's just plain old "we're using up all of our resources", not some act of a vindictive earth-deity. You can make it seem more profound by using symbolism and any other literary device, but it's pretty straightforward.

    I understand that you believe that your currently impressive quality of life depends, in many ways, on continued assaults upon the Earth's ecosystem

    Again, words like "assault"... you can say you are being literary again, but that word has meaning and immediately polarizes the discussion. We are part of the ecosystem. We can change it but we can't "assault" it. Even if we somehow wiped all multi-celled life off of the surface of the planet, the earth would continue to spin around the sun for a few billion years before the sun finishes off whatever's left.

    Your points are perfectly valid - there aren't enough resources for us all to live a Western lifestyle forever given the current level of resources and technology. Reducing resource consumption is certainly likely to be a big part of our lives going forward. We also need to be more careful with our environment - but this has been known and acted upon for at least 40 years in Western countries. If you are trying to convince people that we need to do more, you might find more neutral language more effective. You start in with "assault" and "mother earth" talk and you'll get a positive response from people who are already converted, but a defensive reaction from the rest. Nuclear energy may well need to be scaled back, but not because it hurts the Earth God's feelings.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  31. Re:Gaia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You're just a person that hates humans. Start with yourself, please.

  32. Re:Gaia by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    By the way, if you still think he's being rhetorical, read his other comment in this thread.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  33. House burned down by matzahboy · · Score: 2

    My friend's house burned down a few days ago because of this fire.

  34. Re:Gaia by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    You first. Reduce your usage of evil electricity by turning your computer off, and not turning it back on again.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  35. Re:Gaia by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    I remember watching one episode and gave up. They were way too stupidly over the top. The "lesson" on the show I saw was not to use offroad vehicles in the oh so fragile desert. They had a kid on a dirt bike initially, but then there was some villain types driving these big smoke spewing vehicle all over the place for... some reason, I guess. WTF? Did they have coal fired boilers or something?

  36. Re:Apparently by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but where's New Mexico?

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  37. Re:Gaia by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    The planet has living things -on- it. It is not a living thing -itself-.

    You're right, the planet is not a living thing like an animal, rather it is a complex system. And in the same way that you can easily fuck up an entire eco-system by artificially introducing (for instance) a predator with no competition, so it is possible that the Earth will cease to function as a system capable of supporting human life ue to human interventions. And I really don't care if the cockroaches survive.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  38. Re:Gaia by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    As it was a children's series, you don't think that they might possibly have over-simplified things inorder to get across the message? You don't get a lot of emoational or philosophical subtlety on most kids' cartoons.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  39. Re:Apparently by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Whoa, slow down there maestro. There's a NEW Mexico?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  40. Re:Gaia by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

    Has it ever occured to you that Gaia is a made up fantasy creature that stemmed primarily from the psychological projections of primitive cultures that hadn't even discovered basic mathmatics yet? Don't get me wrong, if you like making your life choices based on the whims of a fairy tale creature, go right ahead. The rest of us are going to laugh at you though.

  41. Camp May destroyed by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    Forget all the nuke sensationalism. LANL had a big wakeup call about a decade ago, concrete doesn't so easily burn, and it's unlikely anything really terrible that the "reporters" want to talk about, is going to happen. It would take a transgovernment level of incompetence; something humanity hasn't seen yet.

    OTOH, adios Pajarito. I was there three and a half weeks ago, and when I checked the fire maps last night .. Camp May is totally inside the fire perimeter now. It's been an annual tradition for us to drive up there for Summerfest every year, hike on the ski slopes and watch the bikers, drink nearly all of New Mexico's microbrews, hang out with the Atom Mashers (Los Alamos' version of our Dukes of Ale) and have a good time. Reminisce about a previous year (finally amusing with hindsight) when some ravers scheduled their thing at the same time as Summerfest, so that the forest echoed with techno all night while we tried to sleep off our drunkenness. But now, I think all that is over.

    Driving up there, you see the 2000 fire is still a massive scar, a forest of dead trees. That tells me that a decade from now, all of the stuff we're losing right now, will still be gone. Sure, if you take the long view, these fires are inevitable and the forest will always grow back. A lot of good that does me, a mere human without centuries to spare. I'll never see it again.

    Bandolier is trashed too. Valles Caldera is at least seriously threatened. Dixon Apples (no 2011 crop anyway) had a damn close call; with pretty much everything surrounding the orchard destroyed. Urban Northern New Mexicans (i.e. the majority of the voting population) are really feeling this one, because this time it's one of our very favorite playgrounds getting burned.

    You can see a shift in public attitudes about fireworks. I don't know that fireworks even caused this fire, but reason always said that it was a serious risk, and now the common New Mexican is having the lesson pounded into their hearts regardless of whatever their brains were telling them. They're (mostly) all changing their attitudes, right before my eyes. I think we'll almost certainly see some policy changes as a result.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  42. I think that it's not so bad. by saylar · · Score: 1

    I think that it's not so bad.