Slashdot Mirror
The Science of Human-Robot Love
An anonymous reader writes "By harnessing a new sphere of science called 'lovotics', Hooman Samani, an artificial intelligence researcher at the Social Robotics Lab at the National University of Singapore, believes it is possible to engineer love between humans and robots. Samani's robots have artificial psychological and biological systems that mimic the human brain and endocrine systems, and use movements, sounds, and lights to show their mood and level of affection for a human."
Bzzzzzzz.....
I8-D
Um, that's not called love. You can call it eccentric, kinky, quirky ... even obsessive and crazy. But love? No, that's not love.
Don't tell me they're bringing back the furby..
Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
I AM HERE FOR THE PLEASURE EXPERIMENT MADAM. Please ignore my cardboard body, I am merely a prototype.
"When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
Don't date robots! http://www.hulu.com/watch/4510/futurama-anti-robot-propaganda
F$*& it?!
It can hate too!! i bet that little robot is gonna murder his owner in his/her sleep if she/he doesnt pay attention.
I love my scuba when it cleans the kitchen floor, bathroom floor, etc...
http://www.dieselsweeties.com/
Dare to Hope. Prepare to be Disappointed.
What is this neuro-babble? They misspelled Serotonin in the video, they mention Endorphin in that list as if it's a single compound and not an entire class of neurotransmitters, and they think that specific mixes of these chemicals can elicit exact feelings and emotions. "Well Jim, this human has a 1:3:2.8:6 ratio of Oxytocin, Dopamine, Secrotonin [sic], and Endorphin, it must clearly be Tired." I really don't expect there to be even an outline of an algorithm for a current personality based on hormone level since there haven't been concrete neuronal correlates of applying hormones to specific parts of the brain (since they're transmitted through the bloodstream and therefore are whole-body modifiers, making that stupid brain scan animation moot). Why not just call this a Furbie with a different casing? Unless they can show me the underlying algorithm of how the robot decides its emotions, then I can't put it past a simple Tomagotchi program.
Until scientists create a hot sex bot we can fsck, all other steps towards this ultimate goal are of no consequence.
I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
What's next? GAY Robosexuals? :-D
http://futurama.wikia.com/wiki/Proposition_Infinity
So you've created a device capable of displaying a behavior in response to a pre-programmed set of stimuli... and you're calling that "love". Isn't it more likely that the unit is simply displaying a signal that the human is supposed to *interpret* as love, so that the unit can be properly anthropormorphized? In reality, you've created an emotional masturbatory toy. I'm sure this will be a big deal to those who think that the real thing is just "too hard" to do.
Guy must be lonely.
Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
"Oh, Fry, I love you more than the moon, the stars, the..."
[monotone] "POETIC IMAGE #36 NOT FOUND."
I wonder which U.S. State will be the first to legalize Robosexual Marriage.
Al joking aside about "robot girlfriends", an untiring, on-demand machine will become ideal. You only need to fill it with lube occasionally. It'll never object, it'll never come home drunk. It'll never interrupt your xbox time. It'll never reject you because you got fat or wrinkly. It'll make hedonists of today look silly having to deal with another human being and their schedule.
And that will be the end... when we stay home because we prefer a machine. We'll give up on loving our own kind not because it is superior, but just because it is less "work".
Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
It is a complex Tamagochi program. As are we, just yet a little more complex. Whether or not the complexity is the same as human emotion is not what decides whether or not something is an emotion in and of itself. In fact, you have human beings with varying emotional capabilities as well, so where do you set the bottom line for what is and what isn't called an emotion?
I want my Lucy Liu-bot!!
General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
But how many BULLETS does it hold? If it can't lovingly defend my baby with a rain of lead, I'll kick its ass!
If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
The name is Human Samani.
Sorry, I forgot there are ads on the Web; I use Lynx.
when connected into the "brain" of one of those hyper realistic Japanese love robots. We can call them Cybernetic Love Nodes, or CYLONS for short. oh...wait
Let's work on artificial intelligence before we start in on artificial emotion. We already have way more naturally occurring emotion vs intelligence as it is.
How is there an article about robots and robot love without any mention of Japan in it?
---
I once saw a documentary on this. The strangest thing was that it was done in as a cartoon and had as one of the main charters an alcoholic robot named Bender.
Time to offend someone
this is a big step towards robots manipulating human emotions. just sayin
We all know what the end result of this will be:
Obligatory XKCD
Time to offend someone
Anyone remember Julie Newmar as "Rhoda the Robot"?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057774/
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Living_Doll
At Sirius Cybernetics Corporation, realism is our goal! Our newest Married-Bot is designed to emulate the feeling of matrimonial bliss. Guaranteed that within two years of purchase it will put on at least 40 lbs, drink beer every night and fall asleep in front of the TV. It will make a mess and not clean up after itself. It will always pretend to listen to you and never know what you just said. It will leave the toilet seat up, fart in bed and play video games for hours. Within 5 years it will have an affair with your best friend or the young girl at the coffee shop.
I can't wait to be rejected by one of these things!
Yeah, yeah. So it was parody week. It still counts!
http://xkcd.com/144/
How many men in the world will *need* a robot girlfriend, given the skewing of the male/female birth ratios towards boys. Too many men, not enough women...that doesn't bode well for social stability. Perhaps some sex bots can fill the gap...so to speak.
Women will still want to have and raise kids for the sense of significance it gives them. Some men will too, for that matter. And that only works if the babies are real.
And even if that didn't work, the government would just start offering incentives and state-run boarding schools and such to keep the population growing.
Life will find a way.
ummmm - I meant a CAT.
You could call it something like a partner square or friendship block or or.......
Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
The first name of a researcher who does work on robots is Hooman. Daft Punk would be proud.
By the power of lovotics! I could have a girlfriend!
Can you fuck it?
ELO Did a song similar to this....
"Yours Truly 2095"
Data: "I'm fully functional and programmed in multiple techniques"
I really hope these lovebots have the Three laws programmed in!
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey any orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Do they come in brown-orange?
I wanna know where I can order my lovable tribble....
I don't know about the rest of you, but I don't want my computer to give me a low squeal and a dose of the puppy eyes whenever I turn it off.
It will just lead to betrayal.
Chobits!
Of course humans will love robots that treat them accordingly while enhancing their quality of life. We've already seen outliers in love with their RealDolls; there, most of the interaction is being provided by the human, but mark my words, the net result will be the same.
When they finally manage to build a nominally acceptable sexbot, you'll see this all over -- because said sexbot will have to have those characteristics anyway.
It would probably take longer if people were nicer to one another and the whole population had access to a reasonable amount of affection and physical contact... because there'd be more competition for them; but you know what? People are really not very kind overall, and our laws, particularly WRT sex workers, are still pretty much in the dark ages.
I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
Apparently the girls there will fall in love with anything!
No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
I don't care about a robot loving me or not, unless it looks like the girl above.
I can accept not having relations with humans (females, in case you were wondering), but getting the "cold shoulder" from a robot? Sorry, that is more then I can take.
Be seeing you...
why isn't the tag line "from the more human than human" dept.?
Vision with execution is hallucination.
I love my fiancee, but, I still acknowledge that our emotional responses to each other is a genetic byproduct of the necessity of mating being necessary for our long-time survival.
What lovebots (not sexbots) do is remove the need for very many of the unneccesary biological functions which complicate life to such a huge extent.
Reproduction will surely not be an issue, an artifical womb wouldn't be that hard and using genetic combinations could easily create children this far into the future.
And, yes, to create a good lovebot you would need a whole lot more knowledge about how the human body works than is available today.
But, once we fully understand attraction and the chemicals involved, a lovebot could easily keep you fully in love at all times, it could also sexually stimulate you in ways which are so far beyond normal sex that it's not even comparable.
Also, remember, an advantage with a bot is the flexibility, there's nothing to say that these bots couldn't also work in normal relationships as well, once you start to break down love and pleasure, it's really just a recretaional activity that's just awesomely better than most other forms to most people.
Having a human companion in your life and having sex-toys and emotional attachments is fully normal today, this wouldn't be much different.
The biggest difference would be that you wouldn't have to find a perfect partner to be fully satisfied, the shortcomings can be replaced by a robot.
I cant wait to be able to get a robot that looks like Rosie Huntington, and then start wining her and dining her....and maybe even sit down near a fire with her, and start leaning in, and tell her how much i love her 1s and 0s....
reminds me of robot 790.