Slashdot Mirror


Bug With "Singing Penis" Is World's Loudest

sciencehabit writes "The world's loudest animal relative to its size has been revealed to be a tiny bug with a big organ. The water boatman, Micronecta scholtzi, rattles its penis along grooves in its abdomen to produce a chattering song—that registers at 99.2 decibels—about the volume of a loud orchestra heard from the front row. Even though the water boatman does its 'singing' from the bottom of rivers to attract mates, humans walking along the riverbank can clearly hear it. The area along its abdomen that the bug uses to make the noise is only about the width of a human hair, and researchers aren't sure exactly how it produces so loud a song."

117 comments

  1. Amazing by reeno49 · · Score: 2

    I wonder if it takes requests.

    --
    I should have been a girl, with the way I can dance... my moves are amazing!
    1. Re:Amazing by Bieeanda · · Score: 3, Funny

      "You didn't think I asked for a twelve inch pianist, did you?"

    2. Re:Amazing by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      They tweet their weiners, but don't have to resign...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    3. Re:Amazing by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it takes requests.

      Get me drunk enough and I'll do my penis karaoke.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Amazing by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      "You didn't think I asked for a twelve inch pianist, did you?"

      Dang! And spent the last of my mod points earlier today.

      Well done, my friend. Stay thirsty.

      **Slow Clap**

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    5. Re:Amazing by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Just goes to show. It isn't the size of the ship, but the motion in the ocean.

      Dude's got a built-in vibrator that he can play like a master.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    6. Re:Amazing by 12+inch+pianist · · Score: 0

      What am I doing here then?

  2. Queue the puns. by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    What a dick.

    What a knob.

    What a todger.

    What a ...

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
    1. Re:Queue the puns. by zill · · Score: 4, Funny

      Queue the puns

      Puns don't need to be in FIFO order.

    2. Re:Queue the puns. by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      Obviously, this bug never heard that it can make you go blind.

    3. Re:Queue the puns. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Que" the puns.

    4. Re:Queue the puns. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cue" the idiots who can't spell.

    5. Re:Queue the puns. by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

      "Queue" the idiots who can spell, but wind up using the wrong homophone.

      (NB: I include myself in the lineup here.)

      --
      "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
      "A four-foot prune."
    6. Re:Queue the puns. by gknoy · · Score: 1

      You just about made me spit out my soda, sir. Well played!

    7. Re:Queue the puns. by Barny · · Score: 1

      Okay, here goes...

      ... researchers aren't sure exactly how it produces so loud a song.

      Answer: Like a BOSS

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    8. Re:Queue the puns. by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Indeed.... because in this case, both cue and queue would be grammatically correct... though usually cue would be the one you'd use, as in it is their cue to begin, rather than they are forming a queue. /pedant off.

    9. Re:Queue the puns. by EdIII · · Score: 1

      How do you know that this bug is not already blind and relies on other senses :)

    10. Re:Queue the puns. by maxume · · Score: 1

      He even typed it with his penis.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  3. obvious by ArrowBay · · Score: 2

    "Honey, let's make beautiful music together... I'm tired of making it on my own!"

    --
    Domains, shared and dedicated hosting, SSL certs, and more: ArrowBay.net
  4. Over compensating. by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    The area along its abdomen that the bug uses to make the noise is only about the width of a human hair, and researchers aren't sure exactly how it produces so loud a song

    It's probably -because- it's only the width of a hair that the bug makes such loud noises. If mine were the size of a hair, I'd probably be pretty upset and yell pretty loudly too.

    1. Re:Over compensating. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the size of it, it's what you do with it.

    2. Re:Over compensating. by girlintraining · · Score: 2

      . If mine were the size of a hair, I'd probably be pretty upset and yell pretty loudly too.

      Not if you were the size of this critter. Then your dick would be as long as your leg. :P

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    3. Re:Over compensating. by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Mine already is...

      Sorry, I couldn't help myself. Feel free to slap me now.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  5. Re:Your mom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dad?

  6. so small, yet so loud by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Informative

    Micronecta scholtzi are freshwater insects measuring just 2mm that are common across Europe. ...
    On average, the songs of M. scholtzi reached 78.9 decibels, comparable to a passing freight train. ...
    "If you scale the sound level they produce against their body size, Micronecta scholtzi are the loudest animals on Earth," said Dr Windmill. ...
    To produce the intense sound, the water boatmen "stridulate" by rubbing a ridge on their penis across the ridged surface of their abdomen. ...
    "Males try to compete to have access to females and then try to produce a song as loud as possible potentially scrambling the song of competitors." ...
    What makes M. scholtzi extraordinary is that the area they use to create sound only measures about 50 micrometres across, roughly the width of a human hair. ...

    btw, here is the picture of the little bugger.

    1. Re:so small, yet so loud by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      "stridulate"

      Vocabulary word of the day.

      "Stridulation". I like it.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:so small, yet so loud by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      That's when you use the loudest loudspeaker that there is (tweeter in this case,) and send a picture of an erection to various females, hoping for ... well, something.

    3. Re:so small, yet so loud by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      Proper vocabulary lists should always be accompanied with example usage, eg

      "Hey, PopeRatzo, don't stridulate so much, or your voice will get louder."

    4. Re:so small, yet so loud by EdIII · · Score: 1

      What I find really curious here is there anything we can learn from this?

      For instance, Velcro was invented by investigating a rather simple phenomenon in nature and then using material sciences to recreate it.

      These seem to be extremely small areas measured in millimeters and the actual effective area in micrometers. Could we learn from this to create sound producing products that can produce extremely loud sounds yet be hundreds of times smaller than any current technology we have.

      Penis jokes aside, there are some very interesting observations here that might have practical applications.

    5. Re:so small, yet so loud by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      (tweeter in this case,)

      Mine is more like a woofer, if you catch my drift.

      and send a picture of an erection to various females, hoping for ... well, something.

      It could have been worse. Something like "2 Congressmen, 1 Cup".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  7. Related disturbing trivia by zooblethorpe · · Score: 4, Informative

    I found that the bug's Wikipedia page contains the following disturbing gem (bolding mine):

    M. scholtzi is easily differentiated from other species in this genus by the twisted left paramere of the male genitalia, (see Traumatic insemination ) the short pronotum and a distinctive dark pattern on the head.

    I thought getting your schwartz twisted was a bad thing, but apparently this little feller has capitalized on it to develop a whole range of antisocial hobbies. Who knew.

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
    1. Re:Related disturbing trivia by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Ah Slashdot. News for Nerds. Bugs that Chatter.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Related disturbing trivia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Holy. Fucking. Cow.

      That shit is fucked up.

    3. Re:Related disturbing trivia by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      Not sure if you're trolling but it's a reference from a movie called "Space Balls" which is full of many amusing scenes and quotes.

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    4. Re:Related disturbing trivia by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Yes but schwanz means tail or colloquially penis in German..

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    5. Re:Related disturbing trivia by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      Yes but schwanz means tail or colloquially penis in German..

      The reference was not lost to me, ich kann Deutsch.

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    6. Re:Related disturbing trivia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, cos "traumatic insemination" isn't disturbing.

  8. News for nerds, stuff that... gets hard. by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Funny

    Has slashdot descended so far that news for nerds is now "animal makes noise with its dick"? Really now...

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:News for nerds, stuff that... gets hard. by Osgeld · · Score: 3, Funny

      Isn't that the same as open source news?

    2. Re:News for nerds, stuff that... gets hard. by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a piece of trivia a nerd might tell me.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    3. Re:News for nerds, stuff that... gets hard. by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, there are biology nerds. I happen to be one of them. While I don't particularly agree with the presentation of the story, the factoid itself is of interest to me. A weird evolutionary path. Fascinating.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    4. Re:News for nerds, stuff that... gets hard. by ciaohound · · Score: 2

      Slashdotters might find it inspirational. If a bug can find a use for its penis, there's hope for the rest of us.

      --
      Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    5. Re:News for nerds, stuff that... gets hard. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Slashdotters might find it inspirational. If a bug can find a use for its penis, there's hope for the rest of us.

      The insect in question is using it's penis to procreate. Just like the rest of the animal kingdom

      Your turn...

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:News for nerds, stuff that... gets hard. by M8e · · Score: 1

      I don't think he will turn. You would just sniff his butt.

    7. Re:News for nerds, stuff that... gets hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a poster on Slashdot, what would you know about procreating?

      Your turn.

    8. Re:News for nerds, stuff that... gets hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We finally found something that can drown out your queef

    9. Re:News for nerds, stuff that... gets hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Factoid means "resembling a fact but not factual"

    10. Re:News for nerds, stuff that... gets hard. by ammorais · · Score: 1

      It's not about the dick. It's about the size.
      For sure the title should be something in this lines: "2mm Bug Is World's Loudest".
      Even though, how can't you find this story interesting to nerds. Imagine the possibilities.
      If a 2mm bug can do a 99.2 decibels sound, so can your ipod/notepad/phone/pad/[whatever future small] device.

    11. Re:News for nerds, stuff that... gets hard. by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Except than that future small device would only produce one note repetitively. I don't know if your average pop listener would even notice however.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  9. I can answer that one by fragfoo · · Score: 1

    The area along its abdomen that the bug uses to make the noise is only about the width of a human hair, and researchers aren't sure exactly how it produces so loud a song.

    A horny bug, it will make it work.

    It has to.

    --
    Sig? Heil
  10. So the bugs are doing 2 Live Crew? by Chas · · Score: 3, Funny

    {Son} Dad? What're those bugs singing for?
    {Dad} They're rap fans.
    {Son} Huh?
    {Dad} 2 Live Crew fans actually.
    {Son} 2 Live WHO? Dad? What're the damn bugs singin' about?
    {Dad} Their song is the bug version of "We Want Some Pussy"
    {Son} Oh.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  11. Acoustic Levitation by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

    Phallus jokes aside. It would be great to understand how this works. We've somewhat recently started looking more closely at the notion of acoustic levitation for solving all manner of problems. Particularly containerless manufacturing. It's been suggested based upon various ancient texts that this may well have been the means by which so many of these massive megaliths far exceeding modern engineering capabilities were transported and placed. The ability for something so small to produce such a relatively massive acoustic pressure definitely helps bolster the case.

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    1. Re:Acoustic Levitation by mark_reh · · Score: 1

      It's also been suggested (and believed by many with soft minds) that ancient aliens built the pyramids.

      Video or it didn't happen.

    2. Re:Acoustic Levitation by hamburgler007 · · Score: 1

      I'm all for exploring the science, but I think it is silly to elude ourselves into thinking that ancient megaliths were erected using technology that we are only currently beginning to understand. It is much more reasonable to attribute the construction of those structures with a basic understanding of geometry and a shitload of slaves and time.

    3. Re:Acoustic Levitation by Tasha26 · · Score: 1

      You mean like in X-Men: First Class... the flying-levitation scene in the movie did not impress me at all. I think the US Army will adapt the findings to manufacture crowd control sonic guns.

    4. Re:Acoustic Levitation by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Well, I do have all 10 seasons of SG1, as well as both of the movies, and the original movie that launched it all on DVD....

      (which, sadly, is probably proof for some people....)

    5. Re:Acoustic Levitation by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Where on earth did you get the idea that the megaliths and pyramids are beyond modern engineering? They're beyond the engineering that we presumed people in that era had, and they're beyond the engineering we were using until about the renaissance, but we could quite easily build the pyramids or the sphynx or stonehenge again using modern engineering and construction methods.

      A great deal of knowledge was lost when the Roman empire collapsed, but most of it has been rediscovered and surpassed a long time ago. It's a mystery (sort of) how they were built, but the biggest mystery is where the materials came from, not how they were put together, and there are some very plausible explanations for how the ancients managed to move the materials around, either by barge, or cart, or a combination.

    6. Re:Acoustic Levitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many things wrong with assuming the ancients didn't use basic applied physics and raw manpower to move large objects, and assuming something that crazy, but I will put all of the technical and social problems to the side for now, and focus on something else: The sociology of the situation. We know that the societies used manpower and basic applied physics such as lever systems and pulley systems to create such enormous constructions because as the societies collapsed and fell apart, or their production abilities sharply fell in times of crop failure, we know that there is a direct correlation between manpower and size of creations. Just look at easter island, after the society collapsed their primary source of certain goods they no longer had the manpower to make and put more heads in place. They were still able to show Erik the Red how to do it centuries later, but they didn't make more of them because they were too labor intensive and they lacked the food. If they had been created with low energy means, they would not have stopped just because their crops weren't growing as well or they ran out of trees or something similar.

    7. Re:Acoustic Levitation by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Phallus jokes aside. It would be great to understand how this works. We've somewhat recently started looking more closely at the notion of acoustic levitation for solving all manner of problems. Particularly containerless manufacturing. It's been suggested based upon various ancient texts that this may well have been the means by which so many of these massive megaliths far exceeding modern engineering capabilities were transported and placed. The ability for something so small to produce such a relatively massive acoustic pressure definitely helps bolster the case.

      The bug does not use wings. It props itself up on three legs (a tripod), points its propulsion unit at the ground, and levitates.

    8. Re:Acoustic Levitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be silly delude ourselves into thinking it's the only, or in this case even best, explanation. It's equally silly to rule it out in general on the basis that we only just now understand it. That our technology evolved one path first doesn't preclude someone else having evolved along another path first; it's not as if acoustic levitation actually depends on electronics or even heat engines, merely that we discovered it after them. Serendipitous discovery is not implausible; while a theoretical understanding certainly requires the calculus, the same applies to innumerable other inventions that were used by empirical understanding.

      Remember the Antikythera mechanism had differential gearing, not reinvented in the West before 1720. Someone anywhere from the 17th century onward would have felt perfectly justified in attributing ancient navigation and astronomy entirely to manually computed tables, and considered the suggestion they had analog computers beyond the astrolabe that we were "only currently beginning to understand" so much rubbish. But thanks to one lucky discovery and a whole lot of reverse engineering, we now know they'd have been completely wrong.

      Now what DOES make sonic levitation a poor explanation is that the energy required increases with the mass you're levitating, and for a cavity with an arbitrary q, power to sustain the field scales with the energy; the sheer power requirements seem more implausible than simply moving the rocks.

    9. Re:Acoustic Levitation by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      We could build pyramids but it would be fucking expensive. I guess that's why the pharaohs built the things though.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    10. Re:Acoustic Levitation by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I can't wait to fly on Daedalis (sp?)

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  12. congressman waterstrider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More wang for your fuck? Imagine how loud the honeymoon is.

  13. "Singing Penis" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I though the description referred to an error in a sound driver in a Linux release named "Singing Penis."

  14. In the mammalian world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That award goes to John Meyer.

  15. Singing Penis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that Justin Beiber?

  16. Megaliths not so very mysterious. by zooblethorpe · · Score: 4, Informative

    While acoustic levitation is certainly an interesting phenomenon, I wouldn't get too confused about ancient monuments and ancient texts -- basic applied physics is all we need to understand how to move multi-ton blocks of stone with nothing but manpower.

    By way of reference, have a look at Wally Wallington's website -- not joking, the guy shows some very convincing demonstrations of how a single human can move 20-ton chunks of concrete (concrete being easier to obtain than stone, but functionally similar).

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  17. I'll be in the rest room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to try something out...

  18. At what distance? by l00sr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Decibel figures are meaningless without knowing the distance of the observer to the bug's penis. For all we know, the scientist jammed the bug's willy into his/her ear, in which case the sound could obviously be perceived much louder than an orchestra from the front row!

    1. Re:At what distance? by SquirrelDeth · · Score: 1

      If I could get a million dollar grant i would stick a bug penis in my ear.

    2. Re:At what distance? by pegasustonans · · Score: 1

      Decibel figures are meaningless without knowing the distance of the observer to the bug's penis. For all we know, the scientist jammed the bug's willy into his/her ear , in which case the sound could obviously be perceived much louder than an orchestra from the front row!

      Pics or it didn't happen.

      --
      And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
    3. Re:At what distance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "No".

      The original story is from the EU. There, the reference sound pressure for auditory "decibels" is typically 20 micropascals, originally measured as "the softest sound you can actually hear".

      "Distance" is irrelevant. Putting the microphone at the source of the sound is a legitimate way to measuer the maximum loudness, loudness is measured in auditory pressure, not power devlivered. A larger sound source would deliver more overall energy to the environment, and due to more planar propagation is likely to be louder at a distance, but maximum loudness is stell measured right at the sound source.

    4. Re:At what distance? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Also decibel is logarithmic and size is not. Not sure if they calculated that as well. The blue whale produces 188dB.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:At what distance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dbm would be much better, but TFA says you can hear them while walking, and they stay at the bottom of the river, so I guess they actually are pretty loud.

      again, this is probably just poor report, any scientists knows the difference between db and dbm...

    6. Re:At what distance? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Yes, I think that comparison is way off. An orchestra submerged on the bottom of a river would likely not produce any sound hearable from the river bank. And neither would a freight train.

    7. Re:At what distance? by qwak23 · · Score: 1

      Actually distance is very relevant to sound measurements, including a measurement at the "source" (typically SPL levels are measured/given 1 meter or 1 yard from the source depending on your geographic location.). The article does not mention where the measured values are occuring, which makes them fairly useless for any calculations regarding sound propagation.

  19. Isn't it obvious? by Bieeanda · · Score: 1

    Given the proportion of prong to bug, that noise you're hearing is sheer pride.

  20. Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is even worse than that article on the Shrieking Titmouse.

  21. Organ grinder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big deal. I can do that.

  22. So a bug says to the TSA... by Cytlid · · Score: 1

    ... Dude, don't listen to my junk.

    --
    FLR
  23. lucky bug by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    i wish my penis could sing

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  24. In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Justin Bieber concert cancelled due to noise concerns.

  25. rename by walmass · · Score: 1

    I think they made a mistake with the name, it should be Meganecta Schlongi.

  26. Heard on the radio (NPR) today: by walmass · · Score: 1

    The pink conch has a penis half its body length and mates for hours. When it is having sex eels and lobsters may eat it's dick but no problem--it will grow a new one in a few months

    1. Re:Heard on the radio (NPR) today: by mcavic · · Score: 1

      A few months? That sounds like a problem to me.

  27. That's not a bug. by John+R.+Isidore · · Score: 2

    It's a feature. :)

  28. Re:Your mom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I'm your uncle Jim.

  29. Slashdot...where are you? by happyfeet2000 · · Score: 2

    For a moment I thought I was in reddit. I'm looking for any connection in this article to a technical subject, any, well, I guess I'm losing my sense of humor.

    1. Re:Slashdot...where are you? by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

      Well, to make it technical, this could be interesting for speaker technology. Imagine cellphones producing loud quality music with a deep bass!

    2. Re:Slashdot...where are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention speakers shaped like big wobbly dicks.

    3. Re:Slashdot...where are you? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Or fart apps!

  30. 99.2 decibels! by blair1q · · Score: 1, Redundant

    That's nothing.

    I once knew a Congressman whose penis was so loud that just one tweet from it echoed for weeks until it made his career explode...

  31. Produces So Loud A Song? I Know Why by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    Because if you rattled your penis that way, you'd scream just a loud as a Boat, man.

  32. Re:Amazing - More importantly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "about the width of a human hair"
    But how many library of congresses can fit on it's penis?

  33. A Useful Comment in a Sea of Lameness by The+Hatchet · · Score: 1

    How about studying the bug to figure out how to use the effect to make super effective speakers and sound equipment? That makes a lot more sense than the endless jokes about penises, what, are you all sexually repressed teenagers or something?

    --
    Where is the mod rating for "scary"? Also, ...
    1. Re:A Useful Comment in a Sea of Lameness by dominious · · Score: 1

      what, are you all sexually repressed teenagers or something?

      Four words: /.

    2. Re:A Useful Comment in a Sea of Lameness by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Nice first sentence; I tagged this "speakertech".

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  34. any others? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    worlds loudest singing penis? i dont know of any others...

    1. Re:any others? by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      Well, there's this one.

  35. Re:Your mom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But now that you're older I think it's ok to finally tell you that I probably am your father..

  36. It's not how loud you sing... by Rollgunner · · Score: 1

    It's whether or not you can hit all the notes in the right order... Sheesh.

  37. Far more likely explanation by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    I think it's a lot more likely that the penis isn't making the noise at all. Yes, it's doing what they say it's doing, but the noise actually comes from the bug's screaming, either in sheer ecstasy or excruciating pain.

  38. World's Loudest What? by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

    'Bug With "Singing Penis" Is World's Loudest'

    Assuming the article subject is grammatically correct, this must be the world's loudest bug. Given the propensity for phrase structure errors on this site, however, I am left wondering if this is the world's loudest bug, or the world's loudest singing penis.

  39. Well, if no one is going to say it, I will... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This gives a new meaning to "horny".... or to toots one's horn.

  40. Music sooththe save beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wonder they are so happy and calm

  41. Figured it ou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its clearly doing this with the help of KYOJI (tinyurl.com/thehelpofkyoji)

  42. Reinforcing Waves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't have to move very far to make the sound, so maybe it moves at exactly the right speed to creative positive addition of successive waves, creating amplification.

  43. Resonance .. ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    someone contact these guys and ask them to observe the contractions / physical contortions these creatures exhibit in different environments, warm water, cooler water, and wether they adapt slightly to produce the correct frequency required for that environment .. could be resonance ! .. using the water as the resonating medium !

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonance

  44. Science is News for Nerds by npsimons · · Score: 1

    Has slashdot descended so far that news for nerds is now "animal makes noise with its dick"? Really now...

    I can't think of anything more nerdy than science (which this is). It just happens to also be highly amusing. Not to mention the last line of TFS is intriguing, and could really matter: what if you could one day buy a speaker no bigger than your fingernail, but it could fill a room?

    What, would you rather see the latest bullshit about pop-star-drama-du-jour? Or how about what the next color iThing will be?

  45. How Exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The area along its abdomen that the bug uses to make the noise is only about the width of a human hair, and researchers aren't sure exactly how it produces so loud a song." Because God is smarter than they are - simple enough.

  46. The breadth of a hair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...doesn't matter, as we all Slashdotters know that it's the little man in the boat that makes the loudest noise...
    Sorry, just couldn't resist.

  47. and i thought i was cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because mine can whistle. i guess that's why some folks call me "whistle dick".

  48. Now thats a penis! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    To say that your penis makes enough noise to equal an orchestra from the front row, I can just imagine what the female vagina of that species is capable of...