Slashdot Mirror


How Japan's Data Centers Survived the Earthquake

jfruhlinger writes "A lot of Japan's infrastructure was knocked offline by this year's massive earthquake and tsunami, but its data centers by and large stayed running. How'd they pull it off? Good architecture and good planning, for the most part. But the data centers still face challenges in post-quake Japan, not least a new law mandating reductions in power use."

24 of 37 comments (clear)

  1. Well... by errandum · · Score: 2

    Almost every single building that wasn't in a coastal city or near the ocean survived. Why is this news?

    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      because its on slashdot.

  2. Post-quake Japan? by blair1q · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Japan is a hump in the Earth created by subduction of the Pacific plate under the North American plate (yes, Japan is tectonically a part of North America).

    Japan will only be post-quake when the Pacific plate stops digging under it.

    They survived this quake because they're being rattled persistently. They survived it the way everyone else survives persistent exposure to dihydrogen monoxide, a known corrosive agent, or high-frequency near-visible photons, a known carcinogen. They are adapted to live in it because it is a continually reoccurring part of their environment.

    Tsunamis, however, are a bugbear they are not really prepared for... did any data centers in the wet zone survive?

    1. Re:Post-quake Japan? by bluemonq · · Score: 2

      Tsunamis, however, are a bugbear they are not really prepared for... did any data centers in the wet zone survive?

      There are no data centers in that region... precisely because they didn't want to have to deal with tsunamis.

    2. Re:Post-quake Japan? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Tsunamis, however, are a bugbear they are not really prepared for... did any data centers in the wet zone survive?

      Data centers and such can be built on a mountainside to put it out of the reach of most tsunamis.

    3. Re:Post-quake Japan? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      and the car dealerships did?

    4. Re:Post-quake Japan? by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      and the car dealerships did?

      Data centers may be located anywhere. Car dealerships need to be close their customers.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    5. Re:Post-quake Japan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Car dealerships pretty much have to be placed where people are. Data centers can easily be dozens or hundreds of miles away.

    6. Re:Post-quake Japan? by PerfectionLost · · Score: 4, Informative

      Did any data centers in the wet zone survive?

      From the Article:

      Another mitigating factor was that 70 percent of Japan's data centers are in the Tokyo region, which escaped relatively lightly. There are no data centers in the northeast where the tsunami hit, in part because that's precisely where tsunamis are expected.

    7. Re:Post-quake Japan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Same reason they didn't build any nuclear reactors in that area...oh, right.

    8. Re:Post-quake Japan? by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      It is a funny thing that people choose to live there, but the area is too dangerous for datacenters.

    9. Re:Post-quake Japan? by That+Guy+From+Mrktng · · Score: 2

      Yes it's dumb to build nuclear reactors in places that can be flooded... oh, wait.

    10. Re:Post-quake Japan? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Maybe the people operating the data centers should also have been responsible for the nuclear power plants.

      Well, except Sony. Because then we would not speak about a nuclear power plant failure due to a tsunami, but a nuclear power plant failure due to insufficient security ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  3. I was going to make a Square Enix joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I was going to make a Square Enix joke - because their data centers didn't survive the quake.

    Actually, they did. It's just that then the whole "loss of power production capacity" thing happened. And they had to turn off their data centers in order to reduce their power usage.

    Which is strange, because the data center they turned off was for Final Fantasy XIV - their failed MMO. Not sure why it was on in the first place. Also included FFXI, which still has players, so it's not like they didn't lose some money from the deal.

    It's actually even more hilarious than that, because they recently moved their data center from an area that was completely unaffected by the quake to Tokyo, which was hit by the brown outs. So they basically managed to have horrible luck.

    Note that it'd be somewhat tragic if these were actual IT services that people used for actual work, but they're not. They're data centers for really bad online games that by all rights shouldn't still exist in the first place. Which makes it funny.

  4. Strange... by RottenJ · · Score: 2

    Funny, I just got a call from my AT&T datacenter rep, apparently he needs to raise our monthly fees.

    --
    "It's fun to obey the machine" - Ralph Wiggum
    1. Re:Strange... by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 2

      My employer just changed providers away form AT&T, precisely for that reason. Our new vendor is more then twice as fast, at half the price. I feel sorry for those in areas where AT&T is the only provider...

  5. Please correct me if I'm wrong... by Benfea · · Score: 2

    ...but I seem to recall a lot of reports from the aftermath of the 'quake commenting on the fact that the Internet was often the only utility still working for people.

    1. Re:Please correct me if I'm wrong... by errandum · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Almost 100% of japan's buildings built in the last decades are built to withstand earthquakes.

      The fact that the datacenters were secure only means that they weren't built next to the ocean (the tsunami did the real damage in most cases).

      This is a normal thing to happen. Interesting, but not news.

    2. Re:Please correct me if I'm wrong... by errandum · · Score: 1

      oh, and by the way, if the internet was working, then electricity had to be working, and so did the phones. I highly doubt that you heard that anywhere.

    3. Re:Please correct me if I'm wrong... by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but phones run on 50v and can run for up to a week from battery & generators. The power grid can go down and you won't notice it. I remember this after the Newcastle, NSW, Australia earthquake. We lost power and water, but the phones ran for the 2 days we had no power/water.

      Plus, I worked for Telstra and did some stuff in the exchanges in Newcastle. ALL of them have at least 100 batteries and dual generators. The ONLY exchanges that don't have dual generators are little comms huts they have in bumfuck nowhere, but they have at least 1 diesel generator and a bunch of battery backup.

  6. It's the power .... by wsanders · · Score: 1

    Because it wasn't the building that were damaged; they had rolling brownouts due to the nuke plants destruction.

    So data centers without backup power were in trouble, and --- wait, why is this news?

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  7. Good backup by PPH · · Score: 1

    All the hentai is backed up offshore. Everything else is expendable.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  8. Re:Engineering, not Architecture by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    Architects are in charge of aesthetics. Engineers are in charge of functionality.

    The greatest structures are the ones where the architects and engineers were the same people/person.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  9. sigh by errandum · · Score: 1

    Excuse me...

    If DSL was up, then phones were up. DSL travels through your phone lines.

    Also, nowadays, TV, phone and internet all share the same "pipes". Saying that "the internet was one of the only things working" is bulls**t.

    If the internet worked, then everything else was working. Whatever he or you were trying to prove is irrelevant.