Slashdot Mirror


Patriot Act vs. the EU's Data Protection Directive

itwbennett writes "Last week, Microsoft warned that under the Patriot Act the company may be compelled to hand over European customers' data on its new cloud service to U.S. authorities — and also to keep the data transfer secret. This, of course, runs counter to the European Data Protection Directive, which states that organizations must inform users when they disclose personal information. 'Microsoft can already transfer E.U. data to the U.S. under the Safe Harbor agreement. But legal experts have warned that this agreement is hardly worth the paper it's written on,' writes IDG News Service's Jennifer Baker. 'There are seven principles of Safe Harbor, including reasonable data security, and clearly defined and effective enforcement. However all this is nullified if the Patriot Act is invoked.'"

25 of 239 comments (clear)

  1. Down with the patriot act! by asylumx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, why can't we get rid of it?

    1. Re:Down with the patriot act! by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's the Patriot Act which "isn't worth the paper it's written on" - or is it The Constitution that isn't worth the parchment it's written on - since the Patriot Act?

    2. Re:Down with the patriot act! by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Simply put, law enforcement agencies wanted many of the provisions in the PATRIOT act years before it was passed, but nobody was willing to go that far. Then we were attacked by terrorists, and suddenly the political climate changed and the concerns about undermining our constitutional rights magically disappeared. Now that law enforcement has the power they wanted, they are not going to give it up without a fight.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    3. Re:Down with the patriot act! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Constitution has undergone gleischaltung. It was necessary to protect the United States from its enemies.

    4. Re:Down with the patriot act! by flimflammer · · Score: 2

      Because it's the Patriot Act. Clearly only a terrorist would want to get rid of something called the Patriot Act.

    5. Re:Down with the patriot act! by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      You are under a misapprehension of what a socialist would do. Socialists aren't that keen on individual rights against the government. Quite the opposite. Sure, they may support some rights for people than a conservative or classical liberal might not, but those "rights" are actually entitlements and safety nets. Many socialist countries have very effective central government with significant powers in certain cases to do things that would make an American start to froth at the mouth. Things like actual censorship and press controls. That is because a socialist merely has a different idea of what government power should be used for, not about how much power a government has.

      The Patriot Act is not a socialist or conservative plot, it is merely a case of attempting to make government more efficient at the cost of individual liberties. Anyone in government will want to keep it because it makes their lives easier. That includes both liberals and conservatives.

      That's the major reason why giving the government power for *any* reason can be dangerous. The powers that are derived from what is needed to enforce anything can be used by *anyone* who subsequently gets elected for their own purposes. Social Security is protection for people's retirements, and now everyone uses Social Security numbers for everything, even if it is not related to Social Security. The Patriot Act is obvious, but just because it is obvious doesn't make it more dangerous than other measures that have accumulated over time which allow the government to accrue power that it might not strictly be entitled to.

    6. Re:Down with the patriot act! by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 2

      Well said. The powers we give the government keep getting expanded in spite of our protests to the contrary (our, meaning the voters). We have given the enumerated powers, but with those powers, our vigilance has been lax, and the government, corrupt as it is, continues to grasp for more power. The resolution is to challenge it in the courts. The problem is, that takes money, and the vested interests (those who like to restrict liberty... that includes the *AA's) will not take up the cause because it is not in their best interest. It takes a groundswell of individual protest to get any headway, but so far, the government and the complicit corporate press dismiss it as fringe loonies. (I never thought I'd see the day that Founders' concepts would be considered "fringe lunacy.")

      Funny how things turn out like the Founders warned, though. Jefferson particularly comes to mind these days... but the power still rests in our hands, if only we weren't asleep (collectively)... Something has to jostle the voters awake... I thought renewal of the PATRIOT Act (and the TSA in general) would do it... but it hasn't.

      The decline of the Constitutional Republic starts with voter apathy.... the second is letting things (corporations) that don't vote and aren't really people (in spite of the legal definition) control the halls of Congress.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    7. Re:Down with the patriot act! by EdIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That is by far not the most concerning part about the Patriot Act at all. Law enforcement was always seeking ways to obtain data. In every country. Nothing new. For most of them, they are a bit zealous but probably want to protect you. Meaning, the small guys. They are not the brightest bunch and have a hard time seeing the big picture but they are risking their lives daily to protect yours.

      The REAL CONCERNING part about the Patriot Act is the SILENCE BY FORCE.

      When you can't speak about what they are doing out of fear of being incarcerated, we no longer live in the United States of America.

      So what really happened nearly 10 years ago was the United States Of America died. Its soul was stripped, its people were robbed, and we are still reeling in a deluded and dazed confusion arguing about meaningless shit (immigration, gay people wanting rights, and Obama's fucking birth certificate) without confronting the truth that a law exists that makes it illegal for you to talk about actions that need to be talked about.

      When you are a business owner that is being raided by the government for all of your customers information indiscriminately without warrants or just cause and you cannot even warn your customers that their rights are being violated and should be offered the chance to face and defend themselves against their accusers and those that abridged their rights, we all need to seriously consider just what country we live in, is it really free, and have thrown the baby with the bath water out when it comes to protecting Freedom?

    8. Re:Down with the patriot act! by davester666 · · Score: 2

      And then we elected those enemies to Congress...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    9. Re:Down with the patriot act! by vegiVamp · · Score: 2

      It's citizens are it's enemy? I guess that does explain a lot.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
  2. Onoes! by biodata · · Score: 2

    The internet short circuited two jurisdictions causing paradoxical rift in cyberlegalspace.

    --
    Korma: Good
  3. "The Terrorists" by Jawnn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...win again.

  4. Honestly - why do business in the U.S. by Mr+Thinly+Sliced · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm someone interested in releasing my software.

    I've worked on this software for about 1 year my time, and done things I think are "research" in their newness.

    Releasing any software in the U.S. is basically opening me up to a multitude of unfounded lawsuits and I become a target for corporate espionage - why do I bother.

    As a euro developer - I must confess that the U.S. is looking less and less interesting as a revenue source.

    All the "steal people's data" and the "we control domains" - why on earth would I think about building a business in this piranha pool?

    1. Re:Honestly - why do business in the U.S. by gilbert644 · · Score: 2

      It's by far the largest software market in the world and extremely influential, if you don't have a solid foothold in the US you are likely to get screwed down the line by a competitor that does. This is not likely to change anytime soon.

    2. Re:Honestly - why do business in the U.S. by CountBrass · · Score: 2

      More specifically Greece's problems have come about because their citizens behave like spoiled, entitled, children:

      1. Average salary on the Greek railways *including cleaners* is $90,0000 a year.

      2. 600 'professions' can retire at 50 with a pension -paid for by the state- of 95% of their final salary. Why? Because these professions are stressful and dangerous. What's an example of one of these 600 professions? Masseuse.

      3. And now the Greeks have to pay for their profligacy they're on the streets attacking the police with slingshots.

      Meanwhile, in Western Europe where we've paid our taxes and worked, we're looking at our retirement age being raised from 65 to 75.

      I won't be sad when the Greeks are out on the streets begging for spare change from the new Chinese owners of their country.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  5. Ok lets ask an easier question.... by pythonboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok lets ask an easier question.... ... Who doesn't have access to my personal data ?

    1. Re:Ok lets ask an easier question.... by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok lets ask an easier question.... ... Who doesn't have access to my personal data ?

      You

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  6. The summary is wrong. by CountBrass · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are specific exceptions for 'National Security' in both the European directive and each country's implementation (eg the Data Protection Act in the UK).

    So all the US needs to do is find a shill (the UK government would be my guess at their first choice) who will declare that they need to export 'this' data as a matter of 'National Security' (honest!) and Microsoft and in the clear and the US get what they want.

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  7. Re:Of course you realize, by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What it means is that European companies face a fine under the data protection act if they use a cloud service in the USA. I would have thought that it would give the USA more incentive to change the rules than the EU.

  8. Re:Of course you realize, by airfoobar · · Score: 2

    It gives the USA incentive to bully the EU into changing its rules, yes. Wait for a relevant Wikileaks release in a year or two.

  9. Re:WTF? by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There was this brief period during the fallout from the Enlightenment when great men believed that liberty was worth the additional dangers it might add. But, in general, people are too dull and too easily frightened to understand that. They're too easily overawed, too easily swayed by emotional appeals, and lacking in sufficient ability to evaluate statements such as "We're increasing surveillance to maintain your freedoms" and realize that the two notions are diametrically opposed.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  10. News at 11 by MemoryDragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The USA is screwing the only friends they have left over (again)...
    So whats the news again?

  11. Buying a house under the patriot act by MobyDisk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I learned a bit about the Patriot Act when buying a house. Prior to the Patriot Act you had to disclose sufficient financial information to the bank for them to take the risk of the loan. You had to prove you had the down payment, provide a credit report, and appraise the house. But they didn't really care where or how you got the money. But under the Patriot Act you have to provide an audit trail for all of your assets. For example, you must show where you got your down payment from and where it was for the past 6 months, etc. In my case I sold stocks so I had to show tons of statements prove that the money really came from those stocks, not some other place.

    It was fairly creepy. I felt like I was depositing money in a bank and the government required proof that I didn't get the money by selling drugs. It really slowed things down and complicated it. I used to watch TV shows where the police had ridiculous access to people's information, but I see now how that is happening. I can imagine a time when the government can track every dollar - where it goes and where it came from.

  12. Re:Of course you realize, by mmcuh · · Score: 2

    This is probably exactly what will happen. Remember the SWIFT treaty, about transferring bank transaction data from the EU to the US? The European parliament rejected it because of privacy concerns. Then, after a few months of arm-twisting from national governments and visits by Joe Biden among others, the Commission presented a new treaty with some cosmetic changes which was passed in the parliament with a large majority.

    EUs stricter privacy laws are there in spite of its politicians, not because of them, and they are being hacked away at bit by bit.

  13. Bully by CountBrass · · Score: 3, Informative

    t2t10 fantasises that "While European nations were busy raping and pillaging across the globe, American was mostly farming and building up an industrial base."

    Really? So the US wasn't busy wiping out the indigenous populations by both direct military means but also using biological weapons (blankets infected with small pox)?

    They weren't making unprovoked attacks on other nations: Britain (War of 1812), Spain (repeatedly) and Mexico. If we'd applied the same standards to the US then as was applied to Germany after WW2 your leaders would have been hanged as well for carrying out wars of aggression.

    The US fought a civil war because so many of you thought it was the moral and ethical thing to do to keep millions of other human beings enslaved in order to maintain their life-style.

    And of course you were also busy discriminating against your own citizens, quite legally, until the middle of the 20th. And still are but not with quite the same degree of overt legal sanction- what proportion of the prison population in your country is black? How much more likely is a black-man to be executed for a crime compared to a white-man who commits the same crime?.

    I think you're looking at your country's history through rose tinted glasses. The US has, through out it's history, been an opportunistic bully.

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.