Slashdot Mirror


Voicemail Hack Scandal Leads To Closure of UK Tabloid

Some Bitch writes "Britain's biggest selling Sunday tabloid will close after this Sunday's issue. The tabloid has been embroiled in a voicemail hacking controversy for some time now and the news that they compromised the voicemail of a murdered schoolgirl and paid bribes to Metropolitan police officers for stories kicked off a renewed assault on the paper. The News Corp daily counterpart to Sunday's News of the World is the Sun; the domain sunonsunday.co.uk was registered two days ago."

55 of 268 comments (clear)

  1. Fuck Rupert Murdoch by F34nor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Send that fuck a bill for Iraq while you're at it.

    1. Re:Fuck Rupert Murdoch by dadioflex · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not sure if you're being serious but Murdoch, I'll say allegedly and then quote and link an old Guardian article, was pro-Iraqi war and this was largely the editorial position taken by many of his media outlets, papers and television channels.

      Rupert Murdoch argued strongly for a war with Iraq in an interview this week. Which might explain why his 175 editors around the world are backing it too, writes Roy Greenslade

    2. Re:Fuck Rupert Murdoch by BlackSabbath · · Score: 2

      > and the Middle East has one more free country now

      Hahahahahaha!
      You had me going for a minute.
      Oh, wait. You were serious?
      Perhaps you're referring to the bit of Iraq inside the "green zone"/reality-suspension-bubble.

    3. Re:Fuck Rupert Murdoch by Canazza · · Score: 2

      Except, like a hydra, cut off one head and two more will take it's place.

      The first, The Sun on Sunday, a Sunday edition of that whacky fun time daily tabloid everyone in Liverpool loves to hate, that rants on about paedophiles on page 2 and shows a barely 16 girl baring her breasts on page 3. With the second head likely coming with the full buying out of BSKYB. They'll control the News, Sports, Movies and general Entertainment the majority of people in the UK watch.

      I'll stick with Blogs, BBC News, Film4 and Dave thanks. Atleast the BBC can come up with some balanced reporting sometimes.

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    4. Re:Fuck Rupert Murdoch by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

      Indeed, there's already some impetus to prevent Murdoch buying BSkyB ; that would seem to be a likely reason that he's engaging in this symbolic gesture - to draw attention from this campaign.

    5. Re:Fuck Rupert Murdoch by Xtifr · · Score: 2

      US law is not 18--it varies from state to state, and is 16 in most states. The reason most people think it's 18 in the US is because it's 18 in California, where Hollywood is located. People from Hollywood have no idea about anything in the rest of the country, and the rest of the world gets its ideas of the US from Hollywood.

      (Warning, TVTropes links may rot your brain. You have been warned.)

      You can blame Tony's actions on Hollywood, but don't blame it on the US.

  2. Can we close Fox News yet? by blair1q · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the intolerable hyping and biasing of the Casey Anthony trial in complete disregard of the defendant's right to due process isn't enough, there's that whole ordering people to tell lies about science to bias legislation thing.

    1. Re:Can we close Fox News yet? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the intolerable hyping and biasing of the Casey Anthony trial in complete disregard of the defendant's right to due process isn't enough...

      If you're singling out Fox News for that, you're nuts. Every single news outlet was doing exactly the same thing. It was disgusting.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    2. Re:Can we close Fox News yet? by sconeu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah. Isn't Nancy Grace on MSNBC?

      By all that's holy, I cannot stand that woman!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Can we close Fox News yet? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nothing is without bias.

      Yes, but honest news outfits do everything in their power to minimize their bias, rather than reveling in it like Fox and the other NewsCorp properties do.

      --
      That is all.
    4. Re:Can we close Fox News yet? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2

      No; in her house at CNN, dead Nancy Grace waits dreaming.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    5. Re:Can we close Fox News yet? by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Informative

      She's on CNN.
      (My wife is unfortunately an addict of that damnable show).

      Personally, I have zero respect for someone whose very paycheck apparently requires rhetorically feeding from the literal corpses of children, but that aside and to be fair, it wasn't just her, it was the whole damned channel's prime-time lineup: Dr. Drew, "Issues", and the rest of that particularly incestuous bucket of shows.

      To be fair to Fox, they really didn't invest nearly as much time in the whole affair. I don't think MSNBC did all that much on it either, but in their case I don't know offhand. CNN on the other hand seemed like they should have named themselves the Casey News Network and been done with it. :/

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    6. Re:Can we close Fox News yet? by Darkness404 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right, and what "honest news outfits" are out there? None of them. Because quite honestly, no one really cares about news. The masses want their mindless celebrity gossip. The left wants to hear alarmist predictions about what republicans are doing, the right wants to hear alarmist predictions about what democrats are doing. Others want local "mush" stories about a three-legged dog, giving the elderly a free air conditioner, etc. But no one really wants facts and figures. And even if there is a market for facts, how do you even get reliable facts? Everyone with the capability to gather facts will always have an incentive to skew the facts. Even "neutral" organizations such as universities and publicly funded studies have a desire to gain more funds, which either means agreeing with the powers that fund them (usually the government) or being alarmist to gain more funds. Because, no funds mean no jobs.

      Bias is human and as long as humans are involved in some way, news will have bias.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    7. Re:Can we close Fox News yet? by Froboz23 · · Score: 2

      Nancy Grace has interpreted your statement as a death threat. You have been tried in the media and found guilty of attempted murder. Please report to your local police station for sentencing.

      When asked for comment on the Slashdot death-threat case, Mrs. Grace replied "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Nancy Grace CNN wgah'nagl fhtagn!"

      --
      Take off every Sig. For great justice.
    8. Re:Can we close Fox News yet? by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Al Jazeera? BBC? Oh you mean an American news org? Sorry I've got nothing.

      As for TFA? When you are hacking into and deleting a murder victim's voice mails, thus hindering an investigation, and bribing the cops for evidence? Then you've gone way past reporting the news into making it. Personally i hope that just because they close the doors won't stop the investigation and every single one who bribed or hacked gets a nice long jail term.

      After all in these days of shell corps if you can kill an investigation simply by closing the doors I think we'll see a lot more of this crap in the future.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    9. Re:Can we close Fox News yet? by artor3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      False equivalency bullshit, as usually from Fox apologists. There's a difference of scale. Fox, and right-wing pundits in generally, are far more likely to demagogue than their left-wing counterparts. These are the people who actively pushed the idea that the Democrats were trying to set up "death panels" to kill off the elderly. Find me something on Rachel Maddow that is even remotely on par with that.

    10. Re:Can we close Fox News yet? by sqldr · · Score: 2

      Regardless of what people think of the BBC (or other countries' state-run media), it's this exact reason that people are prepared to pay the license fee in the UK. They don't have to "sell" news - they get the money anyway. Their obligation is more towards the BBC Trust (the third party organisation which monitors them) and following their mandate, which states that their output (not just news) must be to "entertain, inform, and be accessible". This includes stuff like making program in Scots Gaelic even though only about 20000 people speak it.

      There used to be a quiz show on Channel 4 called "fifteen to one". Boring stuff, but loved by old people, and was one of the highest rating daytime TV shows getting well above average viewing figures for 3pm on a weekday. The problem was, C4 is a commercial channel, and their income comes from adverts... and old people don't buy much. There's only so many stair lifts and self-adjusting beds you can sell in a commercial break every day. So they canned it after about 20 years. 500000 viewers guaranteed daily, but the advertisers weren't interested.

      On the BBC, that wouldn't have happened.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    11. Re:Can we close Fox News yet? by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      "Terrorist fist bump??" For the life of me i will never understand how she wasnt laughed out of the industry for that one.

      --
      Good-bye
    12. Re:Can we close Fox News yet? by Patch86 · · Score: 2

      On that subject, Murdoch's daily UK tabloid "The Sun" is also in the dock over almost exactly the same thing:

      http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/sun-and-mirror-in-the-dock-over-coverage-of-joanna-yeates-murder-2307524.html

    13. Re:Can we close Fox News yet? by sqldr · · Score: 2

      and unabashedly pro-government in a lot of their stances, rarely questioning the necessity of many government programs

      In the past, pretty much every government in the UK has complained that the BBC is anti-government, regardless of which party it was. What you do get is that on "Newsnight", Jeremy Paxman will grill anyone about anything. There's been some spectacular youtube moments over the years from that. Hmm.. from the UK version of the 'politics' page (we get a different layout to the international version with no adverts):

      'Milliband urges new press watchdog'. Well that's some nice attention for David Milliband who is leader of the opposition. Various spin-offs about the NOTW closure, obviously, a story about a statement from the national audit office complaining that the government isn't doing enough to monitor expenses (we had a major scandal 2 years ago after it turned out the whole government practically had been fiddling their expenses claims.. that made them popular!), a story about a government minister saying they intend to become more transparent.. ok, that's being a mouthpiece for the government.. hell, everyone always says they're going to be transparent. "PM 'too slow' over hack inquiry", and a story about an independent review slagging the government off for the whole "aircraft carriers with no fucking planes to put on them" debacle. That's only the stuff directly related to government in there, but it seems pretty neutral by Friday 08 July's standards.

      Then there was the government sueing them on the Iraqi report "sexed up" claims (they lost, oddly)

      I guess last year when they got sued by the Israeli government for being anti-Israeli and dragged up in front of the press complaints commission for being anti-Palesinian ON THE SAME DAY, it pretty much sums up the problem their anti-bias overlord has to deal with :-) I'm not saying they don't end up being biased, but it's not for lack of trying. If you want to be neutral, you're always going to get it wrong in someone's eyes.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    14. Re:Can we close Fox News yet? by Xest · · Score: 2

      "As for TFA? When you are hacking into and deleting a murder victim's voice mails, thus hindering an investigation, and bribing the cops for evidence? Then you've gone way past reporting the news into making it. Personally i hope that just because they close the doors won't stop the investigation and every single one who bribed or hacked gets a nice long jail term."

      It's worse than that, the person in charge of The News of the World at the time this happened was Rebekah Brooks, she's now a director of News International itself and Murdoch and his son James have chosen to sacrifice The News of the World, which now consists of staff who weren't even around when all this went on to save Rebekah.

      So in other words he's made about 200 possibly innocent people jobless, to protect the woman who was in charge when all this happened. This absolutely stinks and it's been made clear here by many politicians and celebs that we didn't want NotW to close, we wanted the people responsible brought to justice.

      We've got to keep the pressure up over here and I hope people do, because he can't be allowed to get away with it this easily and make other people scapegoats. I only hope those he has used as scapegoats as insiders have more dirt they can use against News International and now have motivation to do so.

    15. Re:Can we close Fox News yet? by sqldr · · Score: 2

      Didn't Stephen Moffat take a rest from script writing? That show takes time to make. You can't just pump out endless episodes. Getting 15 guys to answer general knowledge questions on the other hand. That can run and run.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
  3. shell game...? by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    so they close down one tabloid and move all the employees to another?

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    1. Re:shell game...? by Nick+Ives · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Rebekah Brooks, née Wade, who was in charge at the time is already chief exec of News International. The current rumour mill is that the NOTW staff are being sacrificed in order to keep her safe. As to why Murdoch would go to such lengths to protect her, the thinking is that if she went then James Murdoch would also have to go. James Murdoch has admitted to paying settlements to silence people involved in the hacking affair; he claims that the information given to him at the time was incomplete and he didn't know the full extent.

      Just so everyone is clear what's going on here, Members of Parliament have started talking openly about how they've been threatened by News International. A murder investigation into a private detective where the prime suspects were two other PIs with close ties to News International was interfered with by the NOTW. The former deputy features editor of the NOTW has openly admitted to bribing police to the tune of £5-10,000 for stories - something he doesn't believe should be illegal. Rebekah Brooks accidentally admitted to Parliament a few years ago that they regularly paid the police for stories, although in a clarification 6 months later that claim was retracted.

      There's always been rumours around how Murdoch runs his empire, but now it's being blown wide open. News International runs more like a criminal conspiracy than a legitimate media organisation; they're basically gangsters.

      --
      Nick
    2. Re:shell game...? by Catmeat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      so they close down one tabloid and move all the employees to another?

      No, it's cleverer than that. The close a Sunday tabloid and move a small number of staff to the daily stablemate, just enough additional hands for it to operate effectively over seven days rather than six. The rest are fired, giving massive savings. The News Corp accountants are now punching the air, and the senior management making wry jokes about silver linings.

      Hell, that may have been a long-term plan for a while. The scandal had just given them an excuse to bring the plans forward.

    3. Re:shell game...? by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, it's not so much the employees that interest me; it's the paperwork. Specifically, what is going to happen to all of the News of The World's emails, accounts and all of those other records that might be of use to, say, a public inquiry or police investigation? I can't help but wonder whether this knee jerk reaction on behalf of Rupert Murdoch is a desperate attempt at damage limitation because knowledge of what was going on goes a lot higher up the ladder than just former News of The World staff.

      As an aside, The Guardian has a rather interesting piece on the use of private investigators by UK media from back in 2007 when things first kicked off. The NoTW only came in fifth behind those other stalwarts of quality UK journalism; The People, The Daily Mirror, The Mail on Sunday and, the run-away leader, The Daily Mail.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    4. Re:shell game...? by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Closing down NOTW is being done for no more reason than to keep Murdoch's purchase of the remaining 60% of BSkyB on track. The government has announced a delay, and with David Cameron's close associations to key players (including Andy Coulson who was tossed from Downing Street in shame and now faces arrest), there is a push among many Tories and close supporters in papers like the Daily Telegraph to basically toss News Corp out of Britain. The general sentiment is that Murdoch has had an unholy influence on British politics and it's time for it to go.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:shell game...? by Nick+Ives · · Score: 2

      Closing the NOTW also means they have a superficially legitimate reason to start destroying documents. The police really need to get in there now and start seizing paperwork.

      It makes you wonder why the police have essentially given Coulson 24hrs notice that they're going to arrest him. It makes one wonder if they're giving him a fighting chance to get rid of much stuff as possible in exchange for not revealing the names of officers he could count on to bribe.

      I'm not normally one for conspiracy theories but given the extent of the corruption revealed so far, it's difficult to imagine where it ends.

      --
      Nick
    6. Re:shell game...? by spitzak · · Score: 2

      I believe the GP was posting an alternative scenario to compare with the current situation, not a description of what actually happened after Watergate. He is saying that the current situation is as though Nixon fired the innocent members of the secret service and somehow saved himself and the plumbers.

    7. Re:shell game...? by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      Considering that police have been implicated in taking money for scoops and in basically burying the evidence of illegal hacking, your conspiracy theory may not be far off.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:shell game...? by quarterbuck · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to FT (sorry pay walled link http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/1a199004-a8d5-11e0-b877-00144feabdc0.html) Murdoch was planning to convert his other newspapers (The Sun) into a 7 day newspaper by sharing content/news with TNotW anyway. As it is, his 4 newspapers share the same printing press and he often moves around editors/writers.
      From the FT story
      The second obstacle is that Mr Murdoch and Ms Wade had made known their plan to cut costs and overlap by bringing the News of the World close into line with The Sun as a seven-day operation. It seems likely that News International will resurrect the Sunday title as The Sun on Sunday.

      --
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    9. Re:shell game...? by nbauman · · Score: 2

      Brooks is in a difficult position.

      (1) If she didn't know about the phone hacking, then she was printing stuff in her paper without knowing the sources, and she was incompetent. (Didn't Ben Bradley, the editor of the Washington Post, know the identity of Deep Throat?)

      (2) If she did know about the phone hacking then she was committing a crime.

      I hope she'll be testifying under oath soon. Wonder what she'll say.

    10. Re:shell game...? by Nick+Ives · · Score: 2

      Actually, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act allows for neglect on the part of directors of a body corporate to be just as guilty as connivance or consent. The fact is that the directors of News International should, from the information released, have known about what was going on when it was happening and if they didn't, were neglectful and still guilty. The RIP act is clearly designed to catch and prosecute all unauthorised wiretaps of this form.

      Here's an excellent analysis: http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/andreas-whittam-smith/andreas-whittam-smith-if-we-dont-act-now-worse-will-follow-2307923.html

      --
      Nick
    11. Re:shell game...? by Nick+Ives · · Score: 2

      It was reported on Channel 4 News last night that a senior News International figure had tried to get their data centre in India to delete documents. The call was logged as suspicious and the request was denied, but it does seem like NI are trying to cover their tracks.

      --
      Nick
    12. Re:shell game...? by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      hur hur you said organ

      Sorry.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  4. Aaaaand... by Inquisitus · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...here's the new name, complete with domain registration: http://webwhois.nic.uk/cgi-bin/whois.cgi?query=thesunonsunday.co.uk

  5. And Nothing Of Value Was Lost by ConaxConax · · Score: 2

    I for one cheered when I heard this. A horrid, awful, sensationalist piece of crap 'news'paper. Excellent! Good riddance to bad rubbish!

    1. Re:And Nothing Of Value Was Lost by Skidborg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't get your hopes up.

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
    2. Re:And Nothing Of Value Was Lost by pluther · · Score: 5, Insightful
      They're not really closing it, though. Just renaming it.

      As a brand new organization, the new tabloid won't be tainted with the bad name of the old one. Nor, presumably, will it be subject to their lawsuits.

      The fact that it'll be the exact same people doing the exact same thing is mostly meaningless from a business standpoint.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
  6. Nothing but PR by Chris+Down · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is the press equivalent of amputating a gangrenous limb to try and stop the spread of the infection, without even acknowledging that the rest of the body is already riddled with disease...

  7. Re:Hacking by codegen · · Score: 2

    Actually, what he did in the case of the murdered girl was to fake the caller id record. Many voice mail systems do not prompt for a password when called from the persons home number.

    --
    Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
  8. Voicemail Hack Scandal Leads To Closure of UK Tabl by omar.sahal · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hugh Grant just called the Murdoch Empire a protection racket live on Question Time.

  9. Re:James Murdoch alleged to off broke the law by Nick+Ives · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He almost certainly broke the law. The regulation of investigatory powers act makes it an offence for a corporate body to engage in this kind of behaviour and holds directors personally responsible for connivance and neglect.

    If James Murdoch let things happen on a nod and a wink he's guilty of connivance. Even if he didn't have that level of knowledge, failing to do a full internal investigation based on the allegations from five years ago is a clear sign of neglect.

    --
    Nick
  10. News of the Screws by jambox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Frederick Greenwood, editor of the Pall Mall Gazette, met in his club one day Lord Riddell, who died a few years ago, and in the course of conversation Riddell said to him, `You know, I own a paper.' `Oh, do you?' said Greenwood, 'what is it?' `It's called the News of the Worldâ"I'll send you a copy,' replied Riddell, and in due course did so. Next time they met Riddell said, 'Well Greenwood, what do you think of my paper?' 'I looked at it,' replied Greenwood, 'and then I put it in the waste-paper basket. And then I thought, "If I leave it there the cook may read it" â"so I burned it!' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_of_the_World#History

    --
    You thought you could break the laws of physics without paying the PRICE?
  11. It's just a re-branding by presidenteloco · · Score: 2

    not a closure

    the brand got torpedoed (in terms of goodwill)
    so keep calm and carry on under a new name.
    There's nothing new under the Sun.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  12. Re:Voicemail Hack Scandal Leads To Closure of UK T by rainmouse · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hugh Grant just called the Murdoch Empire a protection racket live on Question Time.

    Strangely enough Hugh Grant, someone I previously disliked for his films has actually shown considerable stones in this whole debacle.

  13. Re:Not just a schoolgirl by rainmouse · · Score: 5, Informative

    The schoolgirl was arguably the worst however as they actually deleted some of her voice mails to make room for new messages to see what else they could dig up about the terrified friends and family. This is both deleting evidence in a murder investigation but also led the family to falsely believe she was still alive by thinking she was freeing up space on her voice mail.

  14. Phone Hacking? by pev · · Score: 4, Funny

    I must say that I'm quite surprised that no-one technically minded has yet managed to raid Mr Murdoch and Mrs Brooks voicemails and publish them on YouTube. I'm sure there must have been some juicy irate messages left and would be a most apt thing to do.

    Hang on, didn't them crafty LulzSec buggers have a request-line...?! Anyone got the number?

  15. Re:Hugh Grant knows the score by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 2

    The reporter, as noted in another comment, stated that Rebekah Brooks knew full well what was going on. His "exposé" may be lacking when held up against heavyweight investigative journalism, but I don't think it's to be sniffed at.

    Secondly, saying "they more or less got away with [it]" is a little disingenuous. Firstly, it's not over. Secondly, there's been an ongoing investigation into the phone-hacking charges and these things take time. Now, barring a criminal conviction, you're right, I suspect Rebekah Brooks will keep her job at News International but ask the 100s of employees of the NotW if they feel like they've "gotten away with it".

    The key is, get chummy with the future PM and the most powerful media magnate in the world and you have job security for life. Do what your told by your mad, King Charles coiffed harridan of an editor and expect to get shit-canned as soon as the wind-changes.

  16. Re:Voicemail Hack Scandal Leads To Closure of UK T by geniice · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He has the advantage that we already know his private life isn't whiter than white and has in any case semi-retired from acting. There isn't much you could really threaten him with.

  17. Re:Boycott the Sun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    The Sunday Sun is a Newcastle Upon Tyne based newspaper that has nothing to do with The Sun or News International.
    http://webwhois.nic.uk/cgi-bin/whois.cgi?query=sundaysun.co.uk

    I agree that boycotting the Sun and the Sun on Sunday is a good idea though.

  18. Re:Voicemail Hack Scandal Leads To Closure of UK T by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah. That does sound rather funny:

    call to Hugh: We will threaten you with exposing your private life if you reveal anything on us.

    -some muttering can be heard in background-

    Call to Hugh: sorry, seems like we already did that. Is there anything else you would like us to threaten you with?

    Hugh: not really

    -more muttering in background-

    Call to Hugh: turns out you are retired and we kinda draw the line at death threats at the moment (new company policy and all), and we're pretty much fucked anyhow. Continue as you were.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  19. sunday.co.uk by alanw · · Score: 2

    Why bother making people type another 8 characters when News International already own sunday.co.uk, which currently redirects to
    the News of the World anyway.

    $ lynx -dump -head http://sunday.co.uk/
    HTTP/1.0 302 Moved Temporarily
    Location: http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/sunday/?view=sunday

    $ whois sunday.co.uk

            Domain name:
                    sunday.co.uk

            Registrant:
                    News International Newspapers Limited

            Registrant type:
                    UK Limited Company, (Company number: 1885543)

            Registrant's address:
                    NI Group Limited
                    3 Thomas More Square
                    London
                    E98 1ES
                    United Kingdom

            Registrar:
                    News International Newspapers Limited [Tag = NEWSINT]
                    URL: http://www.newsint.co.uk/

            Relevant dates:
                    Registered on: 14-May-1997
                    Renewal date: 14-May-2013
                    Last updated: 10-Jun-2011

  20. Re:The way it should be by Patch86 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The company isn't gone. This is the equivalent of The Coca Cola Company selling cans of Fanta Orange intentionally laced with arsenic, being caught out, and then agreeing to discontinue the brand "Fanta Orange" (but immediately announcing the launch of new "Sprite Orange"). Oh, and firing some factory workers who weren't even on the pay roll at the time of the arsenic-lacing for good measure.

  21. The real issue by xenobyte · · Score: 2

    The real issue is not the lack of morals in the tabloid press... We've always known that they never had any.

    No, the real issue is how easy it was for some low-life private investigator to 'hack' voicemails all over the place. Most systems appear to use just 4-digit PINs and have no limits to how many times you can try your luck, as well as no logs (or nobody looking at the logs), so it's not surprising it is possible, but why haven't anything been done?! - This have been going on for 5 years or more, as we know from the early scandals involving this newspaper, and thus despite public knowledge nothing has been done?

    Now that's the real scandal!

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --