Slashdot Mirror
Apple Hits 15b App Store Downloads, But Loses "App Store" Name Skirmish
Coldeagle writes "Apple has been dealt a blow in its 'App Store' trademark case, with a federal judge denying its request for an injunction to stop Amazon from using the term." Apple probably wouldn't trade the name exclusivity it seeks, though, for the success they've found with the business model; the company announced today that the App Store has reached 15 billion downloads.
I thought it was generally accepted that App generally stands for Application. It was a bold move by Apple to try to secure the word, but I am glad they failed.
Apple fans - this is a website for nerds. Not for hipsters.
True nerds love UNIX, and Apple provides an exceptional UNIX out of the box.
That's really what propelled them to start with, Apple's fortunes changed with OS X because at the core nerds had their back seeing an opportunity to bring UNIX to the masses. And you know what? It worked.
Linux for whatever reason is just not the OS you could reasonably give to your mother or grandmother without some hands-on support time involved. OS X is a fire-and-forget computer solution that means family visits are not four hour fix-a-thons.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Why does Apple matter to you that much? Why do you care so much about a company?
Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.
No, we care about locks. Which is, partly, why we appreciate open source.
Apple users are both. PC users are niether. *nix users can be either. Due to the inferiority complex, PC users tends to build exclusivity to compensate.
"She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
this prevents them from suing because of these names
Lindows? I'll grant that it prevents them from suing successfully, but they are more than happy to throw money around to inconvenience the competition.
first, there is no "X11 Windows"; it is the "X Window System (version 11)".
also all citations i can find indicate that you're wrong about the trademark. for one, look to the devil itself http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/en/us/IntellectualProperty/Trademarks/Usage/Windows.aspx: "Windows is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and other countries."
it's an abusive invalid mark and that's how they were able to sue (and decimate) lindows (now linspire). microsoft then settled because they knew they would lose if the case were carried through.
"They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
> Apple is very hostile to advanced, technical users,
> no matter how you slice it.
Really? Here's an exercise. Compare & contrast:
Sony's treatment of Playstaytion jailbreakers.
vs.
Apple's treatment of iOS jailbreakers.
The MPAA's reactions towards DVD Jon and DeCSS.
vs.
Apple's reactions towards DVD Jon and QTFairUse
Microsoft's policies towards X-Boxes known to have been jailbroken.
vs.
Apple's policies towards iPhones known to have been jailbroken.
Imagine all the people...
Why should they have to hack around deliberately placed locks to regain functionality that would otherwise exist by default?
As an Android user rooting their own phone first, then get back to me.
Why buy from a company that is hostile towards you?
Why would I indeed? I wouldn't.
I buy from Apple because they are VERY friendly toward the nerd in how they build systems and the flexibility I derive from them. They are one of the few companies left that really appreciates quality of design in hardware and software together.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
First line of TFA:
200 million iOS users have downloaded over 15 billion apps from its App Store
That equates to an average of 75 downloads per iOS user. That's a lot.
Now I have no idea how many apps a typical iOS user has installed on their phone, but if it's half that I'd be surprised. So sure there are many updates included in this number.
This site has some more statistics on the app's value and prices paid (no idea on the reliability of these numbers, other than that they sound altogether plausible to me). They claim that the average payment amount per app (averaging in the free apps!) is $0.91. TFA mentions a total of $2.5b paid out to developers, which is 70% of the price a user pays, so $3.6b total revenue. This results in about 4 billion total app downloads, or more like 20 per iOS user. An already much more reasonable sounding number. And that also means 11 billion (an average of almost three per installed app) are updates.
And you know as well as I that the hostility doesn't extend to OS X (yet.) Apple sees mobile as the future of computing (hence the "post-PC era" comments from Jobs),
Post PC doesn't mean SANS PC. It means getting past the point of the PC being the PRIMARY platform, and to a world where it is one of many platforms as equals. Mobile is only where computing has to go to extend further than it has, and is ONE future, not all of it.
They were even ready to try and apply US Federal laws against people creating jailbreaks.
Really? When? I never read a single thing that said that, and now of course the point is moot since the law is clear that jailbreaking is fine.
They've gone 180 from where I saw them when I got my MacBook.
They continue to do what they always have tried to do, bring computing to the masses while still giving technical users excellent systems. Any change is you misinterpretation of direction, not an about-course.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Can I play?
Sony's treatment of Playstaytion jailbreakers.
vs.
Apple's treatment of iOS jailbreakers.
Sony prosecuted jailbreakers. Apple didn't.
The MPAA's reactions towards DVD Jon and DeCSS.
vs.
Apple's reactions towards DVD Jon and QTFairUse
MPAA prosecuted. Apple didn't.
Microsoft's policies towards X-Boxes known to have been jailbroken.
vs.
Apple's policies towards iPhones known to have been jailbroken.
Microsoft withdrew already paid for online services from jailbreakers. Apple didn't.
You make a fine point.
Using a pricing scheme similar to iTunes, with 70 percent ($1.04) to the developer, $0.20 plus 2 percent of the ASP ($0.23) to the credit card company, and 1 percent ($0.02) per app for processing (storage & delivery), Apple’s App Store gross margin on revenue from paid apps ($428 million since launch) is about 44 percent, or $189 million in gross profit,” Munster explains. “This does not factor in the roughly $81 million Apple has spent since launch to store and deliver the 4 billion free apps that have been downloaded.”
Meaning the actual costs were not exact. The analyst estimated that only 1% for operating costs but it may be higher and even the analyst acknowledged he did not take into account capital costs of building more infrastructure. Data Centers are not cheap. Just ask Google; they spend about $500M for each of theirs.
Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
Beats me about that too, unsurprisingly I don't own an Android device. I bought an N900, which I was able to get Root access trivially and without relying on any exploits.
Yet you do. You buy into Apple's locked down mobile space.
Except that in the mobile space they explicitly deny that to you, and require you jump through hoops and pay for access. And even then you don't get full access over your own devices.