Slashdot Mirror


Apple Hits 15b App Store Downloads, But Loses "App Store" Name Skirmish

Coldeagle writes "Apple has been dealt a blow in its 'App Store' trademark case, with a federal judge denying its request for an injunction to stop Amazon from using the term." Apple probably wouldn't trade the name exclusivity it seeks, though, for the success they've found with the business model; the company announced today that the App Store has reached 15 billion downloads.

8 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. Nerds Love UNIX by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apple fans - this is a website for nerds. Not for hipsters.

    True nerds love UNIX, and Apple provides an exceptional UNIX out of the box.

    That's really what propelled them to start with, Apple's fortunes changed with OS X because at the core nerds had their back seeing an opportunity to bring UNIX to the masses. And you know what? It worked.

    Linux for whatever reason is just not the OS you could reasonably give to your mother or grandmother without some hands-on support time involved. OS X is a fire-and-forget computer solution that means family visits are not four hour fix-a-thons.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Nerds Love UNIX by Microlith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's too bad they had to go and declare true nerds the enemy with their iProducts. After using my 2006 MacBook and enjoying every minute of using OS X, they had to go and take a hostile approach to software development and control over things they sold.

      I can't support them now. And sadly that means the now reduced OS X partition on my MacBook likely won't be seeing Lion, despite having seen up through Snow Leopard.

    2. Re:Nerds Love UNIX by Ash-Fox · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apple never promised a 64 bit version of Carbon

      You may find this article interesting. In particular,

      During the beta of Mac OS X 10.5, the first version that offered a credible, fully featured 64-bit API, Apple included a 64-bit version of Carbon. Adobe used this 64-bit Carbon to develop 64-bit Photoshop for Mac OS X.

      Then a little further...

      and though the company had told developers it was going to be one of the features of version 10.5, and though it worked well, the final release of Mac OS X 10.5 didn't include 64-bit Carbon.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  2. Re:devil is in the details by retchdog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    first, there is no "X11 Windows"; it is the "X Window System (version 11)".

    also all citations i can find indicate that you're wrong about the trademark. for one, look to the devil itself http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/en/us/IntellectualProperty/Trademarks/Usage/Windows.aspx: "Windows is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and other countries."

    it's an abusive invalid mark and that's how they were able to sue (and decimate) lindows (now linspire). microsoft then settled because they knew they would lose if the case were carried through.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  3. Re:Nerds Love Mobile UNIX and POWER by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    > Apple is very hostile to advanced, technical users,
    > no matter how you slice it.

    Really? Here's an exercise. Compare & contrast:

    Sony's treatment of Playstaytion jailbreakers.
    vs.
    Apple's treatment of iOS jailbreakers.

    The MPAA's reactions towards DVD Jon and DeCSS.
    vs.
    Apple's reactions towards DVD Jon and QTFairUse

    Microsoft's policies towards X-Boxes known to have been jailbroken.
    vs.
    Apple's policies towards iPhones known to have been jailbroken.

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  4. Re:Nerds Love Mobile UNIX and POWER by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why should they have to hack around deliberately placed locks to regain functionality that would otherwise exist by default?

    As an Android user rooting their own phone first, then get back to me.

    Why buy from a company that is hostile towards you?

    Why would I indeed? I wouldn't.

    I buy from Apple because they are VERY friendly toward the nerd in how they build systems and the flexibility I derive from them. They are one of the few companies left that really appreciates quality of design in hardware and software together.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  5. You know nothing by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Informative

    And you know as well as I that the hostility doesn't extend to OS X (yet.) Apple sees mobile as the future of computing (hence the "post-PC era" comments from Jobs),

    Post PC doesn't mean SANS PC. It means getting past the point of the PC being the PRIMARY platform, and to a world where it is one of many platforms as equals. Mobile is only where computing has to go to extend further than it has, and is ONE future, not all of it.

    They were even ready to try and apply US Federal laws against people creating jailbreaks.

    Really? When? I never read a single thing that said that, and now of course the point is moot since the law is clear that jailbreaking is fine.

    They've gone 180 from where I saw them when I got my MacBook.

    They continue to do what they always have tried to do, bring computing to the masses while still giving technical users excellent systems. Any change is you misinterpretation of direction, not an about-course.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  6. Re:Nerds Love Mobile UNIX and POWER by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can I play?

    Sony's treatment of Playstaytion jailbreakers.
    vs.
    Apple's treatment of iOS jailbreakers.

    Sony prosecuted jailbreakers. Apple didn't.

    The MPAA's reactions towards DVD Jon and DeCSS.
    vs.
    Apple's reactions towards DVD Jon and QTFairUse

    MPAA prosecuted. Apple didn't.

    Microsoft's policies towards X-Boxes known to have been jailbroken.
    vs.
    Apple's policies towards iPhones known to have been jailbroken.

    Microsoft withdrew already paid for online services from jailbreakers. Apple didn't.

    You make a fine point.