Slashdot Mirror


Undersea Cable Map Shows Where The Data Pipes Are

overThruster writes with a report from TechCentral that "Greg Mahlknecht has built a free map showing the world's submarine telecommunications cable systems. The map, which took Mahlknecht several months to complete, is free of charge and will remain so.'" (At least until it gets shut down as a security threat.)

97 comments

  1. Looks like the old telegraph maps by JoshuaZ · · Score: 5, Informative

    This looks very similar to the maps of the undersea telegraph and telephone lines from around a hundred years ago. See, e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1901_Eastern_Telegraph_cables.png This shouldn't be that surprising since the basic idea of the technology (large underwater cables to transmit information) is the same, the population centers a hundred years ago are not that far off from the population centers today, and the geoological constrains are similar also.

    1. Re:Looks like the old telegraph maps by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      VERY interesting. Thanks for sharing that link. Aside from the new cables between the US and Asia, you're absolutely correct in that most of it is very similar.

    2. Re:Looks like the old telegraph maps by albertid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Nice observation! An even older communication system also resembles the pipes to some degree, namely the major trade routes from 1400-1800: http://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch5en/conc5en/tradeflows14001800.html

    3. Re:Looks like the old telegraph maps by syousef · · Score: 1

      New Zealand's south island had telegraph but doesn't have broadband? Me thinks this new map is incomplete!

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    4. Re:Looks like the old telegraph maps by willmorton · · Score: 1

      From the point of view of the US or Europe, maybe. Look at the waters around Africa, there's a whole lotta difference, especially in the next couple of years.

    5. Re:Looks like the old telegraph maps by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Comparing the old and new maps, it looks like the old telegraph system had a more robust connection between Europe and South America than is found today. Given that the 'B' in "BRIC Countries" is for Brazil, I would have thought that there would be at least a couple major pipes linking Europe and South America directly (through Brazil), instead of via North America. Granted the possibility of the connection between North and South Americas being interrupted is slight, but still...

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    6. Re:Looks like the old telegraph maps by jrumney · · Score: 1

      The cables don't necessarily land in population centres. In Malaysia, there are a few cables landing in Penang and Malacca, with total bandwidth of a little over 1Tbps, but on the other side of the peninsular, which is less populated but facing Japan and US, there are two cables landing in small towns with bandwidth of over 2Tbps, and a third cable that is just under 1Tbps. Surprisingly, no cables land in the Klang area, where population is most concentrated. I expect some very high bandwidth cables between Johor and Singapore are missing from the map, as they are considered too short to count.

    7. Re:Looks like the old telegraph maps by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Actually, I just realised that the cables landing in Penang and Malacca support your point that these cables are following the old telegraph routes, as Penang and Malacca were important colonial settlements up until WW2.

    8. Re:Looks like the old telegraph maps by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if those telegraph lines from Sydney are going to nowheresville in the South Island or Wellington, my money would be on the latter, as routing the lines over the Southern Alps to the population centres in the South Island would not make sense, and they are too far North to be going to Greymouth, which is about the only notable population centre on the West Coast of the South Island. Interesting that one of the internet cables from Sydney is shown approaching Manukau harbour but labelled as landing in Takapuna. Historically New Zealands first internet connections landed in Manukau harbour and were routed to a data centre in Waikato University. Nowdays it is all commercial, and the gateways seem to have moved North to Takapuna and Whenuapai, but I'd have expected some redundancy to at least Wellington, and maybe Christchurch (in case of Cook Strait cables being knocked out).

    9. Re:Looks like the old telegraph maps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but they know a lot more about the issues of undersea cables along those routes, anywhere else is pretty much a crap shoot, and when you're spending big money to do a project, you need a really good reason to go with the more expensive unknown issue route.

    10. Re:Looks like the old telegraph maps by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      Cable landing points are usually chosen in quiet areas: no shipping means less chance of some doofus dragging his anchor through the cable and causing the nautical equivalent to backhoe fade.

  2. Wait... by lostmagik · · Score: 0

    Wasnt there a successful tapping of an underwater pipeline some time ago? ..of course its a security threat.

    1. Re:Wait... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      US Navy routinely tapped Soviet and likely still taps Russian Federation undersea communication cables.

      This is the boat that most likely does it
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Jimmy_Carter_(SSN-23)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Ivy_Bells

    2. Re:Wait... by unencode200x · · Score: 1

      Good read! Operation Ivy Bells is most interesting. I guess that's why they frown on people in financial trouble for government jobs.

      --

      Chance favors the prepared mind.
      Perfect is the enemy of good.
  3. Tubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So it is a series of tubes. I knew it.

  4. Svlabard has a 5 TB cable? by trigeek · · Score: 1

    Svalbard is an island in the Arctic Circle, with no permanent population. Why does it have a 5TB cable terminating there?

    --
    Sometimes I doubt your committment to SparkleMotion!
    1. Re:Svlabard has a 5 TB cable? by Nadaka · · Score: 3, Funny

      That is obviously where the secret UFO base is located.

    2. Re:Svlabard has a 5 TB cable? by nschubach · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svalbard_Undersea_Cable_System

      Its capacity is used by NASA, the United States Department of Defense, the European Space Agency, UNIS and others.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    3. Re:Svlabard has a 5 TB cable? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

      Up there? That's the department for keeping track of who's been naughty, and who's been nice.

    4. Re:Svlabard has a 5 TB cable? by hardwareman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Svalbard is an island in the Arctic Circle, with no permanent population.

      There are over 2000 permanent residents that disagree :)

    5. Re:Svlabard has a 5 TB cable? by houghi · · Score: 1

      And then compare it to Australia. Even combined it does not get that much.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    6. Re:Svlabard has a 5 TB cable? by Dahamma · · Score: 2

      It explains everything in the Wikipedia link shown right in the "More Information" section on the map...

      "The earth/ground station on Svalbard is a key site for collecting remote sensing data from polar orbiting satellites, such as those from NOAA, due to its close proximity to the north pole."

      But even if it was an easy answer, it was one I didn't know existed, so I'm glad you asked it ;)

    7. Re:Svlabard has a 5 TB cable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe the satellite station.

      I was curious so did your searching ;)

      per wikepedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotellneset):
      "It is the location of Svalbard Airport, Longyear and the port for shipping of coal from Longyearbyen. Above Hotellneset is Platåberget, which is the location for Svalbard Satellite Station."

      I guess that satelite station is one of the ground stations responsible for Gallileo system.
      http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.rss.html?pid=37249
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_(satellite_navigation)

      5TB does seem a bit excessive, but perhaps it handles a little bit more then just GPS. Or maybe they figured if they're running wires they might as well put room for growth?

    8. Re:Svlabard has a 5 TB cable? by Lectrik · · Score: 2

      And those residents need their porn. And lots of it!

      It's not like they can go outside and not freeze to death or anything

      --
      --- As to make my comment seem, by comparison, more intelegent... doodie doodie doodie poop poop poop!
    9. Re:Svlabard has a 5 TB cable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You gotta figure the naughty proportion of the bandwidth is over 90%.

    10. Re:Svlabard has a 5 TB cable? by Nadaka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      just like the rest of the internet.

    11. Re:Svlabard has a 5 TB cable? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Someone has to track the submarines...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    12. Re:Svlabard has a 5 TB cable? by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Informative

      5TB does seem a bit excessive, but perhaps it handles a little bit more then just GPS. Or maybe they figured if they're running wires they might as well put room for growth?

      The latter. Only 20 Gb/s is actually used - the rest is dark. But when you're running a 1300km stretch of cable, you may as well throw some extra in there. Far more cost effective than having to do it again in a few years.

    13. Re:Svlabard has a 5 TB cable? by Cimexus · · Score: 2

      Not quite ... including all the publically available information I can find (from that map and other sources), Australia's current international undersea capacity is comprised of:

      JASURAUS – 5Gbit/s
      SEA-ME-WE-3 – 960Gbit/s
      PIPE-PACIFIC-1 – 1.92Tbit/s
      AUSTRALIA-JAPAN-CABLE – 1Tbit/s
      GONDWANA-1 – 640Gbit/s
      SOUTHERN-CROSS – 2.4Tbit/s (2 paths, in a ring, 2x 1.2Tbit/s)
      TELSTRA-ENDEAVOUR – 1.28Tb/s

      Total capacity: 8.205 Tb/s

      That capacity is not all lit either - it's enough for the current level of demand. The main issue with internet in Australia is actually the price of domestic transit rather than international (capacity to the US is cheaper per Mbps than domestic capacity).

      In anticipation of the nationwide NBN FTTH network which is currently under construction (and which will no doubt massively increase demand for capacity), further cables are under construction ATM. Most importantly the PACNET cable (Australia-US) which is due to be completed in 2013 with a massive 12 Tbit/s capacity (i.e. it will overnight more than double our total international bandwidth).

      Anyway either way, a 5 Tbps cable to Svalbard certainly does seem pretty 'overkill'!

    14. Re:Svlabard has a 5 TB cable? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Rule 34

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  5. I haven't read it in years and years... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...but I recall Neal Stephenson's article on undersea cables was very interesting.

    1. Re:I haven't read it in years and years... by miasmic · · Score: 1

      Good call, even though it's 6-7 years since I read that, it sprung to mind when I was looking at the map and I was planning on looking it up again.

    2. Re:I haven't read it in years and years... by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      Calling it an article is quite the understatement. I've seen novels that are shorter. Still well worth the read though.

  6. On the other hand.. by lostmagik · · Score: 0

    "In the mid-1990s, the NSA installed one such tap, say former intelligence officials familiar with the covert project. Using a special spy submarine, they say, agency personnel descended hundreds of feet into one of the oceans and sliced into a fiber-optic cable." If you have the resources to do that i bet you can get the maps either way...

  7. Antarctia? by pz · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is there no cable to Antarctica? Hmm... (type, type, click, click) ... Oh, I see:

    Antarctica is the only continent yet to be reached by a submarine telecommunications cable. All phone, video, and e-mail traffic must be relayed to the rest of the world via satellite, which is still quite unreliable. Bases on the continent itself are able to communicate with one another via radio, but this is only a local network. To be a viable alternative, the fiber-optic cable must be able to withstand temperatures of -80 C as well as massive strain from ice flowing up to 10 meters per year. Thus, plugging into the larger Internet backbone with the high bandwidth afforded by fiber-optic cable is still an as yet infeasible economic and technical challenge in the Antarctic.

    From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_communications_cable

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    1. Re:Antarctia? by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      We should get working on that! After all, those male penguins need their porn while they're sitting on those eggs...

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    2. Re:Antarctia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also worth noting that most "Internet" satellites (eg. WildBlue) are in geosynchronous orbits, which means - No signal at high (or low) latitudes.

      AC

  8. Not much of a threat by GigG · · Score: 1

    "Cable is a schematic representation of the connectivity. Path might not be geographically accurate, and branching configuration is a best-guess."

    --
    Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
    1. Re:Not much of a threat by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      It's interesting how many of the cables seem to be fairly precise, and others are clearly guesses or approximations.

      Look at the three lines that terminate in Seattle. One of them is extremely precise, with weaving and meandering even at the nearest zoom levels. One of the others is so approximate that it crosses over islands as it goes from point to point.

    2. Re:Not much of a threat by uncledrax · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much due to how accurate the published data is. Some network operators have turn-by-turn directions of thier fiber paths in urban areas.. others only publish "it goes from pt A to B.. that's all you need to know".

      --
      ----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
  9. Landfall locations by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    Interesting where it shows cables making landfall. In the Los Angeles area, it shows Diablo Canyon nuclear plant and Hermosa Beach. I was pretty sure the cable coming in south of LAX made landfall through ShitPipe, 4 miles north.

    1. Re:Landfall locations by demonbug · · Score: 1

      Interesting where it shows cables making landfall. In the Los Angeles area, it shows Diablo Canyon nuclear plant and Hermosa Beach. I was pretty sure the cable coming in south of LAX made landfall through ShitPipe, 4 miles north.

      The locations for those cables are schematic and not necessarily accurate. Don't know about the LA-area ones, but I believe the cable landings in the San Luis Obispo area are in the Morro Bay area and Grover/Shell/Pismo Beach area. At any rate, I remember that there is a major interconnect in the Los Osos area near Morro Bay where a couple of major undersea cables are hooked together.

  10. Always wondered.. by daffy951 · · Score: 1

    How do they lay out these cables? Are they on the bottom or floating & anchored? Are there repeaters? Anywone know where I can read about it?

    1. Re:Always wondered.. by hawguy · · Score: 1

      How do they lay out these cables? Are they on the bottom or floating & anchored? Are there repeaters? Anywone know where I can read about it?

      Try the internet, I heard that there is a lot of information there:

      http://www.google.com/search?q=how+do+undersea+cables+work

    2. Re:Always wondered.. by dkettmann76 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Looking through the presentation archives of the NANOG meetings ( http://www.nanog.org/presentations/archive/ ) has some great stuff on undersea cables and also ISP peering, etc.

    3. Re:Always wondered.. by demonbug · · Score: 2

      Someone else already posted it, but Neal Stephenson wrote a great article on just that subject a few years back (okay, over a decade ago - but still very good and interesting). You can find it here.

    4. Re:Always wondered.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to wikipedia, they are on the bottom. Can you imagine if they were floating? Some careless submarine or whale would take one out.

    5. Re:Always wondered.. by uncledrax · · Score: 1

      Instead it's careless boat anchorage :]

      --
      ----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
    6. Re:Always wondered.. by Archwyrm · · Score: 1

      It's because of careless whales that we had to hunt them nearly to extinction. If they had been more thoughtful, we could have avoided the whole dreadful affair altogether!

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. -- Mussolini
    7. Re:Always wondered.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they were floating, I doubt they'd be called "submarine" or "undersea" cables, plus they might pose a small obstacle to shipping.

      I'm certain you can read at least a little about it at Wikipedia, beyond that GIYF. Or you could just post dumb questions and hope nobody directs you to goatse instead of answers, hmmm?

    8. Re:Always wondered.. by mariushm · · Score: 1

      This Wired article is very long but very informative and it's worth the time to read it:

      http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.12/ffglass_pr.html

  11. Other interesting things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guam is like some sort of data hub, eh?

    What is that weird cable from Argentina snaking all the way around and across to Africa? What is the point of laying something like that? Seems like a lot of cable just to make that one dedicated connection.

    1. Re:Other interesting things by uncledrax · · Score: 2

      Guam is a hub because it's a US Terrority centrally located in the Pac Ocean. It's not like the people in Guam have 1000-count fiber into thier houses, it's just a landing facility.. much like
      Re: SA->Africa: Someone(s) wanted it enough to pay/bond it.. so it got built.. *shrug*

      --
      ----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
    2. Re:Other interesting things by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      What is the point of laying something like that?

      Connecting to the rest of the world through a European telecommunication company instead of an American one? The point is it was probably cheaper.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Other interesting things by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      If you're referring to ATLANTIS-2, it's a cable connecting South America to Europe, and the specific routing is because it's paid for by a consortium of companies from Argentina, Brazil, Senegal, Spain, and Portugal. By crossing the Atlantic where it does, it takes a route that minimizes the amount of deep-water cable needed.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    4. Re:Other interesting things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because South America's not the most peaceful part of the world, and they don't want Uruguay, Paraguay, Bolivia, or any non-national force in those countries, Brazil, or even Argentina itself being able to cut off their internet access if they get in a squabble. Also, overland cables through wilderness regions aren't exactly cheap -- I doubt an undersea cable on the continental shelf's cheaper, but it's low maintenance and not that much more expensive.

    5. Re:Other interesting things by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Guam is simply a conveniently located switching point. A lot of capacity from Australia, for example, goes up to Guam, because it can then be split out and placed on one of the many US-Asia pipes across the north Pacific. Data can turn 'left' to go to Japan/Asia, or hang a right to go to North America.

      This means a company can build a cable from Australia to Guam and then make use of the huge capacity to both Asia and the US from there. Multiple destinations for a single cable, compared to dedicated cables to Asia and the US separately (which do exist as well, and have better latency, but are obviously more expensive to build).

  12. Anyone that can tap a line could build this map by rwade · · Score: 4, Informative

    Who is this Greg Mahlknecht? He's just a random guy doing this as a hobby, which means he has no particular propreitar/secret inside information from AT&T or some other. It would be trivially easy to anyone that has the resources to tap a underwater comms line to just build this map from the same source data, summarized as follows in TFA:

    Mahlknecht has drawn his data from a variety of sources. “Wikipedia has a ‘submarine communications cables’ category and I used this as a starting point before going to each cable’s homepage and gathering alternative information."

    Another note is that this data is very general. It's generally straight lines from landing to landing. You couldn't take this map or the KML data he's pulled together, send a submarine down straight from some point on the map and be able to spot the cable. It's going to take some work.

    1. Re:Anyone that can tap a line could build this map by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      If you click on the lines he describes the accuracy of each cable.
      Some of them are pulled directly from GIS data and are probably accurate down to a few meters.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:Anyone that can tap a line could build this map by Jstlook · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Who is this Greg Mahlknecht?

      A guy who saw that there was a really cool poster that cost money, and decided to make himself a free version. Of course, had he asked the people who sold the poster, he might have found out they have an electronic copy available to download at no cost.

      Ah well.

      --
      ---jstlook ---For that is the way of Elves, for they say both yes AND no, and mean every word of it. --- J.R.R.T.
  13. Capacity by demonbug · · Score: 1

    By my count it looks like there is a total capacity of about 30 Tbps between the U.S. west coast and Japan, and only about 20 Tbps between the east coast of NA and all of Europe. Seems strange given the relative distances.

    1. Re:Capacity by GreenTom · · Score: 1

      Looks like the trans-pacific cables are newer than the trans-atlantic, might just be an artifact of whatever the technology was at the time the cables were installed.

    2. Re:Capacity by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Clearly Europeans aren't big fans of tentacle rape pr0n.

  14. (At least until it gets shut down as a security th by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    From TFA: (At least until it gets shut down as a security threat.)

    Looks like it's already been slashdotted, so they won't need to.

  15. Everyone one already knows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that the transAtlantic cables land on Hudson Street in NYC. If the 9-11 cocksuckers had been smart, they would have blown that up instead.

  16. Missing Some by jroc242 · · Score: 1

    Cool map but it is missing some. SEA-ME-WE-2, the Southern cross(listed on the side but not on the map) FIJI needs high speed internet too! The ADEN-DJI crossing the mouth of the gulf of Aden, I could go on. Point being that there is a LOT of undersea cables, this map shows some.

    1. Re:Missing Some by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Huh? SXC (both halves of the loop) definitely appears on the map for me. As does SEA-ME-WE.

  17. Look out West Africa by abarrow · · Score: 1

    Yikes. I worked in West Africa for a few years, and we dreamed about the day when SAT-3 would bring us more than a couple of satellite T1s. Next year, they are getting over 10Tbps capacity, and almost more importantly, it's coming in separate, redundant cables.

    It's hard to imagine what that's going to do.

    Now, if they could only keep their cable landings and their terrestrial infrastructure working.

  18. noticable difference between areas by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    In europe and north america the cables come accross the sea and then land at a small number of places.While in africa, the middle east and other underdeveloped areas they tend to follow the coast with loads of landings. It would appear that in these areas undersea cables are being used as a substitute for land based infrastructure because countries don't trust their neighbours.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    1. Re:noticable difference between areas by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      It's also cheaper: most of the cost in the undersea cable will be paid for by companies outside the country (since the landing is only a small part of the cable).
      And it's more reliable. Stringing a cable overhead through jungle/desert/what have you isn't exactly foolproof. Burying the cable is a huge infrastructure project, way too expensive for those countries.

  19. Bad idea by Corson · · Score: 0

    This was a childish thing to do, in the same registry as "Look, no hands!". Now terrorists know where the comm pipes are. Sometimes it is better to think before you act.

    1. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the most ridiculous thing I ever herd. First of all, the map doesn't claim to show the EXACT point of landing or position of the cables, only the location cities that they connect. Second, do you really think that terrorists will attack the cables just because they can find a map? That's like saying if only the WTC hadn't been on a map of NYC that we'd never have had 9/11...

    2. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stick, arse, out.

    3. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crap! Who put the USA on this map? Now the terrorists know where it is!

    4. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The routes are (a) made from sources publically available on the internet, and (b) not accurate enough to find from the map.

      Even if they did know where a cable was, they're buried a meter deep in the ocean floor until they get into deep sea. The terrorists can't even make a set of exploding underpants, they're not going to be able to sabotage the cables!

  20. What about Guam? by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 1

    It has more bandwidth running through it than Hawaii. Is that for the world's largest K-Mart?

    1. Re:What about Guam? by EQ · · Score: 1

      It has more bandwidth running through it than Hawaii. Is that for the world's largest K-Mart?

      One explanation is the US Dept of Defense. Guam is a large military logistics center

      Another point is that Guam is legally US territory, so US law applies there, whcih can be handy for certain commecial ventures, as well as for military/defense/intelligence data transit

      Plus Guam looks to be a handy location in terms of landing a cable there as a reshape/regent/retransmission (3R) redistribution point prior to going back into the water (look at the geography)

      --
      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo! http://goo.gl/J9bkO
  21. wow.... by peteinok · · Score: 1

    He has successfully replicated the same map I get from telco carries over couple of years. WAY TO GO!

  22. Re:Where the pipes at? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seriously doubt that there are that many Romanians on here right now. If you're trying to find some, I'd check here first.

  23. Guam by sturle · · Score: 1

    And the price for best connected island goes to... Guam! If you zoom satellite view in to the north-western airport, you can see at least four B52s. And the main road is called "Marine Corps Drive". I guess those guys need a lot of porn.

  24. Do Not Anchor or Dredge by anorlunda · · Score: 1

    What security threat? You don't need a map. Just cruise the coast looking for signs that say DO NOT ANCHOR OR DREDGE. The US military figured that out decades ago.

    And no you can not make them more secure by not putting up those warning signs because someone will anchor or dredge and cut the cable.

  25. Not to be a dick or anything by eyenot · · Score: 2

    ... but the cablemap app was really annoying, it slowed Firefox down like hell, and there was no way (that I could discern) of easily seeing the whole world map at a high resolution, so I made some screen caps and put them together in Photofiltre. I gave the author credit in several places on the map.

    http://db.tt/UEjKBo5

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    1. Re:Not to be a dick or anything by eyenot · · Score: 1

      In retrospect, saving it as a 16-color .GIF wasn't a hot idea, but it looked better before I saved (a bug in Photofiltre). I should've saved in 32 colors. Oh, well. It was only 31 caps and I still have all of those and the progress .BMP of composite-1-20 (eleven caps to go). If anybody was really interested in a better version, I could make it, but to tell you the truth, the actual thing isn't any more legible than the 16-color .GIF . . . just being honest.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    2. Re:Not to be a dick or anything by cffrost · · Score: 1

      If anybody was really interested in a better version, I could make it [...]

      Thank you, good buddy. Will you please save one as .png and just let loss-less compression optimize for color-count?

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    3. Re:Not to be a dick or anything by eyenot · · Score: 1

      *shrug* I never paid any attention to png. I thought it was like a step away from raw bmp or something, and hence was why it was always seen being used with tiny, tiny images.

      If you can tell me why it would be better to save it as png rather than a 32-color .GIF (which, btw, is also loss-less compression, although from about ten years ago comes with a potential legal and financial liability) then I'll do so.

      In either case, if you at least say you want to have the image in a better format no matter what format that is, I'll put it that way. It'll only take me about an hour.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  26. Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is Canada!?!

  27. Except that it doesnt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the map. Most of the cables are schematics. It doesn't show where the cables -are-, it just shows how the points are connected.

  28. and I complain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geeze,, and I complain about running cable two rooms away..

  29. Africa's hookup is interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Basically a bunch of fat pipes heading straight down to SA, and a series of drops at random locations on the way.

  30. All this and... by dark+grep · · Score: 1

    ... Basslink too! Fantastic. What a great resource.

  31. Guam and Hawaii are main structural differences by miasmic · · Score: 1

    The most obvious changes for me are the development of Guam and Hawaii as hubs of the pacific, where in the telegraph world Hawaii was an outpost and Guam wasn't on the map. Otherwise, it's surprising how similar the two maps are, even the level of development around the coast of Africa, which, although greater now was surprisingly developed in the telegraph world.

  32. Meanwhile Catalina has nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazing - Svalbard gets huge internet. Right off the coast of Los Angeles CA is Catalina Island. Beautiful place. I heard their internet speed was that of the 1990's

    No underwater pipe to the island.

    Unbelievable.

  33. Cryptonomicon by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    ALL LIES!