Slashdot Mirror


Study: Ad Networks Not Honoring Do-Not-Track

itwbennett writes "According to a new study from Stanford University's Center for Internet Society, almost half of the Network Advertising Initiative (NAI) members that Stanford studied left tracking cookies in place after a Web user opted out of targeted ads. NAI's executive director said that with no consensus on what do-not-track means, ad networks continue to gather data for business reasons other than providing targeted advertising. 'Under the NAI self-regulatory code, companies commit to providing an opt out to the use of online data for online behavioral advertising purposes,' Curran said. 'But the NAI code also recognizes that companies sometimes need to continue to collect data for operational reasons that are separate from ad targeting based on a user's online behavior.'"

4 of 133 comments (clear)

  1. Justification for Adblock et al by CelticWhisper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For those people who tried to argue against Adblock and other tools to help users control how their information is used and how their browsing experience plays out, this should take the wind out of their sails at least a little. Browser developers and advertising companies came up with a standard for not tracking the users who don't want to be tracked and the ad companies promptly turned around and fucked those users over. Why should we respect the wishes of marketers who don't want us blocking ads now?

    --
    Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
    http://www.tsanewsblog.com
    1. Re:Justification for Adblock et al by maxume · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is no need to justify Adblock or the like, an http request is just a request for some information, it is not a promise to treat that information in a certain way.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  2. Re:But self regulation works !!! by jazman_777 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The government will stab you in the back. Globalist multinationals will stab you in the front. It's a two-headed monster.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  3. Re:well duh by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    capitalism promotes maximal market function, which results in maximum financial yields. this is good. capitalism will also happily market baby organ donation and human slavery as well. this is bad

    pure capitalism then is a form of evil. capitalism is a great beast. it must be harnessed and yoked and it must be controlled and it must be tightly curtailed. or it will run roughshod over your society

    having said all this, noncapitalistic societies are doomed to grinding poverty. so you NEED capitalism. you just need to keep the great beast harnessed under a strong yoke

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it