Slashdot Mirror


Mass Psychosis In the USA?

Hugh Pickens writes "James Ridgeway writes in Al Jazeera that with over $14 billion in sales in 2008, antipsychotics have become the single top-selling therapeutic class of prescription drugs in the U.S., surpassing drugs used to treat high cholesterol and acid reflux. While once upon a time, antipsychotics were reserved for a relatively small number of patients with hard-core psychiatric diagnoses, today it seems, everyone is taking antipsychotics. 'Parents are told that their unruly kids are in fact bipolar, and in need of anti-psychotics, while old people with dementia are dosed, in large numbers, with drugs once reserved largely for schizophrenics,' writes Ridgeway. 'Americans with symptoms ranging from chronic depression to anxiety to insomnia are now being prescribed anti-psychotics at rates that seem to indicate a national mass psychosis.' By now, just about everyone knows how the drug industry works to influence the minds of American doctors, plying them with gifts, junkets, ego-tripping awards, and research funding in exchange for endorsing or prescribing the latest and most lucrative drugs. According to Marcia Angell, former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, under the tutelage of Big Pharma, we are 'simply expanding the criteria for mental illness so that nearly everyone has one.'"

68 of 542 comments (clear)

  1. Americans are generally psychotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No surprise here!

    1. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by gilleain · · Score: 4, Informative

      and europeans are weak willed socialist groupies! yay we can all come up with fun adhominems!

      It's not an ad hominem, it's an insult you moron. Oh, and "you moron" was also an insult. I'm not saying your argument is invalid because you are a moron, I'm saying you are a moron because your argument is invalid.

    2. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 2

      Thank god for someone understanding what an argumentum ad hominem actually is. I was despairing over that particular bit of nonsense lately, thanks for reinstating at least some of my trust in humanity.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    3. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's exponentially annoying when people use it ad nauseum. It literally makes my blood boil!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Teun · · Score: 2
      Nobody can 'prescribe' euthanasia, it has to be a voluntary decision and requested by the patient him or her self.

      There are strict rules assuring the sanity of the requester and it has to be reviewed by a medical doctor.
      The doctor has to report and register the request with the local coroner and the procedure will be checked by a commission.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    5. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      That's definitely tinfoil hat territory. Why don't you just ask your doctor if s/he is paid by any drug companies? I'm not, I never have been, and the most valuable thing I've ever gotten from a drug company was a dinner worth about $50 while I was in residency.

    6. Re:Americans are generally psychotic by Swampash · · Score: 2

      Parent deserves +5

  2. What?! by pinkj · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's crazy!

  3. Just call it "Soma" ... by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Aldous Huxley was spot on ...

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
    1. Re:Just call it "Soma" ... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      I guess it is. Just nobody told them that it's a warning, not a manual.

      What scares me is that some people actually took it as an utopian novel. 1984 is easy to see as dystopian, nobody wants to live in a world like that, but I actually know people who thought that the BNW looks actually quite nice...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  4. Soma by srussia · · Score: 2

    It's a Brave New World.

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
  5. Expensive drugs? by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe those drugs are just super expensive. A total number of consumers would be more useful.

    1. Re:Expensive drugs? by Hebbinator · · Score: 5, Informative

      DINGDINGDINGDING

      Most brand-name antipsychotics can go WHOLESALE for 400-500/month, some are even more than that. Most cholesterol drugs are now on the $4 list, or have a $4 equivalent, except for lipitor (debateable whether or not it could be substituted for another statin because of all the studies..) which will be generic soon. Acid-reflux drug sales bottomed out as omeprazole (Prilosec) went generic and over the counter - the PPI class used to be the big money maker here because there were no generic alternatives. The new generation of antipsychotics are ALL still on patent except for Risperidone.

      Also of note: "antipsychotics" are used to treat more than psychosis. They have been shown to be very helpful in several other psychiatric illnesses.. although I must say there are a *LOT* of cheaper/better alternatives for insomnia. These are not "off label" uses, by the way - many antipsychotics have been researched and gained FDA approval for more than one disease/condition. The class name is being substituted for the indication here to cause a stir.. "if you are on an 'antipsychotic,' then you must be psychotic!" A better name would be "selective d-2 receptor blockers with varying serotonin and anticholinergic receptor activity" but its a bit lengthy ;)

      The real headline here should be "PPI and Statin drug sales wiped out by generic replacements, antipsychotics still under patent. Also, some people havent heard about ambien yet."

    2. Re:Expensive drugs? by Rich0 · · Score: 2

      Everything medical costs 10x as much without insurance. If I were in charge I'd pass two laws:

      1. Everybody providing a medical service must publish a price list.
      2. The medical service provider must collect the same fee from everybody.

      Go to the hospital without insurance. You'll get a $100k bill in the mail. Beg and plead, they'll send you an application for charity care. After submitting in triplicate every financial record you've ever had or not had and spending 100 hours on this, chances are they'll deem you to have a genuine need and offer to settle the bill for a payment plan that only comes to $30k. What they don't mention is that no insurer on the planet pays more than $10k for the same bill, and nobody has to beg for anything. I've seen some crazy explanation-of-benefits statements and they consist of 5 pages of charges where 3/4ths of the charges are simply marked as not allowable, and the rest are paid for 1/3rd the billed amount. The bottom of the letter states that the patient cannot be billed for the difference. Hospitals go along, since otherwise they'd lose half their patients overnight. And then we call the insurance companies evil...

      Plenty of blame to go around in the US healthcare system...

  6. det67vasdfe4 by alostpacket · · Score: 3, Funny

    SDFCDXVPIs dsfousDF W3EIUSVCKNP09U Sdf8uiSDKn09 9ac9 9vskn23kjsfd90iasdf sd0-asvn98vns er923ns-sdfnsc90vusd[vfsdv -DJERPDFGN;fv9vbmn0fngb30dvnopsadng4w- df-09idfma-43k5df-0g dsf0g43590d df09gt3 fg0 4

    (I'm Amrecian)

    --
    PocketPermissions Android Permission Guide
    1. Re:det67vasdfe4 by BlueLightning · · Score: 2

      Please, sir, what language do Amrecians speak?

      Elngish, of course.

  7. Re:Sure by FudRucker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    yeah, because the US FedGov wants everyone too doped up to care about how badly they are getting fucked by the system...

    infowars.com

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  8. Or Mass Over-Prescription... by Scotland+Tom · · Score: 2

    Or it's just a case of mass over-prescription of antipsychotics. Nothing is normal anymore, EVERYONE has some kind of mental or physical disorder that must be treated by drugs.

    1. Re:Or Mass Over-Prescription... by Dreamstalker_wolf · · Score: 2

      I can believe that. When I was very young, I was put on a tricyclic that I recently learned should never be given to children (I don't believe that whoever prescribed it didn't know this). I never was able to find out what the reasoning was for putting me on that stuff, only that it was causing mild depression as well as a host of other odd side effects.

      In my teens, I was put on Resperidone which didn't do shit. That reasoning was schizophrenia...all because I was an avid gamer and fanfic writer. The only thing that happened is my grades sank like a stone because I couldn't concentrate (also a messy almost-accident involving a table saw). My mother took me off of it after I passed out in the car and apparently stopped breathing for a short time. A month later, we see the doc..."She seems to be doing really well! How are the meds going?" "She's been off them for a month." It was quite telling that he couldn't tell I wasn't taking the pills...further proof that I didn't have what I was being "treated" for.

      What did I actually have? Brain trauma in infancy that eventually sorted itself out naturally. I can't help but wonder if had I not been put on all that shit things would have been different.

  9. Everyone wins by alphatel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Last year my wife was suffering from some anxiety during her pregnancy. An internal medicine doctor prescribed an anti-psychosis drug to treat bipolar disorder. The list of side effects included just about everything you wouldn't want to happen to a pregnant women. What would a drug like this do to an unborn child, let alone an adult!

    --
    When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    1. Re:Everyone wins by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

      I did. He got rid of my cold but now I'm hooked on MSG.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Everyone wins by evilgraham · · Score: 2

      I did too, but 20 minutes later I wanted to cure it again.

  10. Well that explains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    the popularity of Facebook and the iPhone.

  11. Re:My nonprofessional observation: by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    Maybe those people are crazy because they're OVERmedicated? And further, because the only things the public health system will pay for on their behalf are shit? I had a county health official prescribe me a pill for respiratory function that it turned out the county health wouldn't pay for (this was a while back in my student days) even when petitioned... something that had been on the approved list just a month earlier, and something for which there was no more effective replacement.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  12. Re:bring on the trolls by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can't we block foreign IPs from this website? Or at least foreign IPs posting as AC?

    Can we block redneck bigots from this site? Or at least start Americans with karma -1 by default?

  13. The Century of the Self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Check out the BBC show "The Century of the Self"

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/documentaries/features/century_of_the_self.shtml

    When you see that, it becomes pretty clear that the US population were unsuspecting guinea pigs in what's certainly the biggest experiment in mass psychology ever done. And that experiment FAILED.

  14. Evidence & Problems by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The point is that it's evidence of overprescription, not of excessive psychotic behavior.

    There is also a problem in the observations in the summary--notably, the mere fact that we are expanding our clinical definitions of psychological diagnoses is NOT a bad thing--the problem is when people treat them wrong. The good thing about expanding and re-working the definitions is that it lets you describe and identify conditions better in each generation than you did in the generation before, and maybe learn something more about how they should be best treated.

    The problem is that almost nobody does real psychotherapy anymore (except for the filthy rich), so in most cases all people do is prescribe medication as if that would treat the problem. There are cases where it will, and there are more cases where it will treat the symptoms, but it often is very much the wrong approach. You can't sit down with someone and cure a psychological issue with a talking-to or folk medicine--they can be complex and very time-consuming and difficult for people to learn to live with or move past or adapt to the world in spite of--but conversations, activities, and the development of a support network in almost every case I have seen has made a bigger impact by far than the use of drugs.

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    1. Re:Evidence & Problems by Sinthet · · Score: 2

      A big problem that results from this over-prescription is the fact that people will believe the way the drug makes them feel is "normal". These drugs are definitely strong enough to be felt and isolated as a cause, and so the uninformed patient will assume that the doctor found something wrong with me, and this pill is fixing it. This creates more demand for the product, which is great for the companies, but with the wide range of effects these drugs can have on different people and personality types, I doubt it's good for the population as a whole.

      I'm not someone who is against drugs, since the drugs here really aren't the problem. Doctor's who take part in this are certainly part of the problem, as are uninformed patients who place 100% trust into (usually) a complete stranger.

      Unfortunately, I don't see a viable way to get rid of either problem.

  15. Re:bring on the trolls by ctid · · Score: 4, Funny

    That sounds a bit paranoid to me. Perhaps you should talk to your doctor. You could probably get drugs to help you with that.

    --
    Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
  16. Lack of exercise by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, as is obvious from our ever expanding waistlines, Americans are getting less and less exercise?and probably sunlight too). I wonder if this is, at least in part, contributing to our increased depression. Several studies have shown pretty clearly that exercise is a great, if not the best, treatment for mild to moderate depression. So instead if sucking down big pharma and big agra's endless supply of shit, maybe we should try getting off our ass and going out for a run or bike ride.

    1. Re:Lack of exercise by Brewmeister_Z · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I started dealing with depression about 10 years ago. I have tried many drugs with little benefit but plenty of the worse results such as weight gain, sexual side effects, and mania. I have been hospitalized multiple times on both sides of the spectrum but nothing was ever stated as a physical cause other than stress.

      Only in the past year was a test done to check for imbalances that may lead to depression. It turns out my vitamin D levels were very low. Many people cannot create or absorb vitamin D very well (especially a problem in winter). To treat it, I was told to take 5000 IU of D-3. Guess what, it worked! And within a few days and not 30 days like some drugs that must build up in your body. Now I take a lower dose (2000 IU) as supplement. If I feel a bit off mood-wise, I can take a dose and it makes a difference within 30 minutes. Also, it significantly cheaper. I can get a 100 doses of D-3 5000 IU for $5 or 200 doses of 2000 IU for $6. I would pay at least $25 for a 30 day supply of anything else as a prescription and that is only if my deductible was met.

      Big pharma always downplays nutrition supplements (even studies that support it) as natural cures because they cannot patent it and charge $5 and up per dose. That being said, some of these drugs do genuinely help people with certain conditions. The problem is the lack of diagnosis to determine the cause of the problem and just trying to chase symptoms with drugs that create more problems than they may fix and may take a month before any benefit is seen. With depression, that is a long time to basically go without help and subjected to immediate side effects only to make a person feel even worse about life.

      Exercise and diet is not downplayed because they know that people do not have the drive, resources and/or time for it be a factor in not needing to take their drug for whatever condition.

      --
      I Cater to the Needs of Stupid People. - from a coffee mug Christmas gift
  17. Re:bring on the trolls by belthize · · Score: 2

    As an non-native American (family has only been here about 7 generations) I think it's not that far a stretch to say many American's are paranoid delusional at least when it comes to foreigners. It's probably something in the water making them crazy.

    We can count them and see if we reach a couple hundred million, you can be '1'.

  18. Re:bring on the trolls by Sardak · · Score: 2

    I'm an american, and I think you're all fucking crazy, too. The strongest drug I take on any sort of regular basis is ibuprofen. I've been diagnosed with clinical depression, but I'm not taking anything for it. I was originally prescribed a couple of different things, but they had no positive effect whatsoever.

  19. Forced by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Over a decade ago, a school psychologist noticed "odd" behavior in one of my daughters. Under the guise of "vigilence", they looked for people to put on drugs. My girls, in grades 1 and 3, were interrogated -- without my permissions or knowledge -- by a school psychologist, who diagnose them with various psychotic disorders. Why? Because the girls told wild tales -- one claimed to know how to fly, and the other told dark tales ala Poe and Lovecraft.

    This bitch of a psychiatrist demanded that we drug our children, and began the process of forcing us to give the girls "medicine" (i.e., anti-psychotic and ADHD drugs), even when other psychiatrists said that my daughters were fine. When asked why she was so insistent on treating my daughters for something that didn't exist, the offending psychiatrist said:

    "I've been taking these drugs most of my life. I know they're good for your kids."

    Needless to say, I no longer live in Colorado, where this travesty was legal. My girls are intelligent, creative, productive young adults (with lots of quirks, like any smart person). Now that they're adults, they can chose what the do and do not put in their bodies.

    American society is driven by a need by people's to feel like a victim, by fear, and by selfish greed. It is a recipe for disaster.

    1. Re:Forced by shoehornjob · · Score: 2

      Damn right. I have a daughter much like your two. Fortunately we know the school nurse (no psych in 2nd grade) and she would never do something like that bitch tried to do to your kids. "I've been taking these drugs most of my life. I know they're good for your kids." That's the problem right there.

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    2. Re:Forced by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      How exactly were you forced? Was a court order involved? Or did the psych force pills down your daughter's throat? Or what?

      I'm not doubting your story, I'm just thinking that kind of information could help other parents who find themselves in a similar situation.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:Forced by hitmark · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "we have been doing it like this for generations, it must be right", the foundation for religion. Tho these days also the basis for a lot of basic political thinking (see Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau being deemed basically infallible).

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  20. I Am Not Surprised by improfane · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I imagine it's pretty easy to become depressed in our society.

    • Consumerism people judge themselves by products (Apple, car brands, discount retailers), they depend on corporate products to do what they could otherwise do, they are powerless to the system, they buy cake mixtures or microwave teleivsion dinners.
    • Devoid of meaning I'd hazard that most people feel that their life is meaningless which brings me to my next point.
    • Life = job People (by necessity) live life a job, not a life. office workers and labourers.
    • Unchecked capitalism Capitalism doesn't feel soft and fuzzy. You feel powerless. Advertising is harmful.

    People who live a job rather than a life do things that advertising and media tell them to do or what other people in their situation do to escape. They turn to alcohol, nightclubs, meaningless sex*, gambling, smoking or anything that is meaningless or self destructive.
    * Not that meaningless sex means anything to Slashdotters but I hope my point is made intellectually.

    I imagine that these factors, plus the fact that everyone seems to be a big asshole these days contribute to people turning to drugs. Ultmately, people feel disconnected from other people, they are ostracized and bullied. Drugs don't solve problems. You do.

      I feel powerless because of the following:

    • My Privacy invaded day by day
    • My Government and the US government is massively corrupt, doesn't tax companies
    • The unjust succeed while the moral wither
    • Everyone thinks they are right so nothing gets done

    As Adam Smith said, agriculture is the root of all progress. Our society is unsustainable and growth seems to be on top of artificial markets. For example, digital markets like the domain market. Or on advertising.

    --
    Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    1. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Servaas · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wasn't this a scene in the extended ultra mega remix ultimate edition Blue-ray disc of Fight Club?

    2. Re:I Am Not Surprised by improfane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If I took the pill, I wouldn't be taking responsibility for what I feel.

      What is the biological reasoning behind people who are depressed anyway? How can it be evolutionary? Surely it doesn't serve any good purpose besides feeding predators?

      Perhaps it's a side effect of sapience? (of which sapience is a side effect of something else) Perhaps are consciousness and sapience is so unbelievably complex that it simply has 'failures' from times to time, overstimulation or sensitivity. In that case, that makes the pill more like a mechanical fix rather than a cop out.

      --
      Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    3. Re:I Am Not Surprised by clifyt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      " I feel powerless because of the following:

              My Privacy invaded day by day
              My Government and the US government is massively corrupt, doesn't tax companies
              The unjust succeed while the moral wither
              Everyone thinks they are right so nothing gets done"

      This is all external, and nothing is an internal. Your privacy? Who cares...the problem is that you think someone does care. Stop worrying about how others judge you, and it doesn't matter about your privacy. The gov't is corrupt? The gov't has always been corrupt. The world has always had more corruption than it has righteousness. It is far easier to be corrupt than it is to be righteous. What does this matter towards your powerlessness? You have the choice to be corrupt or righteous. This seems as though it proves you have power. Same with the very next argument...the unjust succeed. How are you defining success? Money? Power over others? These shouldn't determine your success. You are allowing it to determine your success and you have defined success in a way that allows the unjust to get the upper hand in your world.

      As for everyone thinking they are right...maybe you need to stop trying to be right as well. I'm probably wrong about all of this...I'm right in my world, but my success in life doesn't depend on you agreeing...if you do, that's cool...but I'm not going to base my concept of success on this. If someone else wants to be right, let them...if you want to be right, don't make your success based on others believing it. Believe that you can be right and someone else can hold an opposing view and still be right too. In most complex situations, there can be multiple paths to the right solution...

      Again, who knows if I'm right...I do know I'm happy more often than most people I know...

    4. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fuck me, I hate reading this shit. Going to post anonymously for this one.

      Depression on the whole, is not induced by something like "Unchecked capitalism". While there is a subset of them which may have depression due to social circumstances, last I read, this was a very small subset, and it was argued that this might not be actual depression, or might be much lower on the scale.

      Depression is mainly a physical problem you have. It can be induced by drugs, but for many, it's just your unlucky biochemistry. For these people, everything could be awesome. Just won the lottery, got a promotion at work, etc, everything could be better than they could have ever imagined it, but they feel like shit, they have a warped perspective, maybe suicide ideation, and so forth.

      It has nothing to do with some "objective" measure of the quality of their life.

      Please don't talk about shit you know nothing about.

      Also, just so you know, many psychological studies have shown that everything you said about advertising and consumerism, is actually the opposite. Though, there are studies which do come to your conclusion also.

    5. Re:I Am Not Surprised by agentbuzz · · Score: 2

      @improfane: There is a theory stating that submissive behaviors, beginning with the reptiles, were inculcated into populations to decrease unnecessary aggression, thereby increasing the chances of survival of those populations. Social animals try to compete with others, form alliances, attach to objects such as mother and offspring, and attract mates. Submissive behaviors play a part in competition, attachment, and mating. Social hierarchies are arranged, and subordinate types arrest the expression of aggression, but the motive force favoring attack remains. This allows subordinates to continue to look for opportunities to attack even while aggression is suppressed, and a display of defeat can actually be beneficial to the subordinate animal in the long run. If an animal learns helplessness through trauma, more severe motor deficits and other signs of defeat may actually be collected into a "role" of the defeated. The survival value in this is that the "depressed" animal cannot possibly be seen as attacker and so he is at least allowed to survive. Maybe depressed people could incorporate activities into their lives that program them to expect victory and then the subjective symptoms of sadness, immobility, and anhedonia would lessen or disappear on their own. Perhaps melancholy types would benefit from hiking the Appalachian Trail, committing to a year in a martial arts class, playing guitar in public, or working on Habitat for Humanity projects.

    6. Re:I Am Not Surprised by mjwx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      * Not that meaningless sex means anything to Slashdotters

      If it meant something, it wouldn't be meaningless wouldn't it?

      Believe it or not, I'm someone who engages in a lot of "meaningless" sex. The problem is not that the entire process doesn't have anything more "deep" then sexual gratification but rather that some people try to attach something else then simple gratification to it.

      Just as the parent pointed out in his post, people use it as an escape and this is actually a good thing(TM) but the distinction the GP did not make is the difference between "an escape" and "living in a fantasy world". Having a vice does not automatically make one an addict, for example, a person who drinks is not automatically an alcoholic because they can be capable of stopping and exercise it at will, the ability to keep under the legal limit or to say "no thanks, I've had enough".

      By the same token, there are people who can have "meaningless" sex without trying to attach anything to it. The same with all the other vices the GP listed, one can enjoy gambling, smoking, drinking or clubbing in moderation without actually becoming a victim to that action.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re:I Am Not Surprised by Veggiesama · · Score: 2

      The adaptive rumination hypothesis (ARH) is a popular though highly controversial explanation for the evolutionary origin of depression.

      Basically, depressed people ruminate. They think deep thoughts. They are overly self-critical, pessimistic, and lethargic. Of course, taken to these extremes, major depression is certainly a disadvantage in any context. But in moderation, there are some activities that might benefit from a less optimistic mindset:
      1. Reflecting on one's self-worth ("Maybe I'm not strong enough to take on that saber-toothed tiger without help...")
      2. Ascribing high likelihoods to the probability of future disaster ("Maybe we won't be able to survive the winter without more food stores...")
      3. Having a proclivity for solitary, non-social activities (inventors, artists, etc.).

      By contrast, optimists might charge head-first into danger without stopping to self-reflect. They might waste all their energy on unfruitful endeavors. And so on.

      It could be the case that depression is like the gene for sickle-cell anemia. A little bit helps you resist malaria, while a lot makes you anemic.

      Of course, ARH is fraught with problems and is by no means widely accepted, but it still shows that there's a possibility that what we think of as a negative quality (depression) could harbor some positive benefits.

  21. Why is it nobody is happier? by improfane · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ask yourself.

    Why aren't you happy? You (probably) have: electricity, abundance of food and water, computers, video games, (some) free time, a job, a loving girlfriend/wife? Money?

    You're not happy because you cannot be you in this society.

    It's that trite cliche that materials do not bring happiness but they are necessity for happiness. You cannot be happy about something before you have shelter, food and water. (Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs)

    Our society lacks somethin that people need. Drugs really don't give that to you.

    Arguing about happiness on Slashdot. Very odd.

    --
    Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    1. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by derGoldstein · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know that it's cliche, but someone has to bring up nietzsche at this point. He kept pointing out that people in "the modern era" were really just carts on a rail, regardless of their social-economic status. Whoever you are, there are things that "are expected of you", which, if you chose to avoid, either make you "weird", or even downright rejected.

      It doesn't matter that you have food and shelter. These things don't provide you with real freedom. You're still restrained by society and forced to choose between several pre-determined, "acceptable" paths. If you do anything else, there will be social penalties. His famous collapse at the reigned horse was him weeping for mankind -- we're all shackled and bound, because if we weren't, we'd be too destructive.

      We can't change our lives in order to become happy, so the next logical step is to change our brain chemistry. Maybe then we'll be slightly happier broken-in horses.

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    2. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by improfane · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man."

      I can be happy in my circumstances but not completely content given all the things that are happening in the world. Call it idealism.

      --
      Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
    3. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "We can't change our lives in order to become happy" - no, because we need to change ourselves to become happy. Go to a developing country and they'll almost certainly idolise the West because they are trying to "change their lives to become happy", and have seen the 'benefits' of consumerism.

      Once our basic needs are met, we should spend time removing the junk from our minds, the inaccurate notions and ideas, the misperceptions that have led to us to conclude that happiness depends on something external to ourselves. This is critical to understand, and without deep investigation allows feelings of inadequacy and insufficiency to fester and grow. These feelings can drive some people to work 80 hour weeks, others just have a breakdown.

      The problem is one of focus, but also of education. We aren't taught how to deal with the stresses and strains of life at school, we're just sculpted into workers, cogs in machines. We aren't taught the truth of practices that can rejuvenate our lives, and little is made of balance. Instead, these misunderstandings allow us to be hijacked by advertising and media, and be turned into slaves.

      The current situation isn't sustainable. Just this week I read that the US, on the brink of default, will decide to pay its interest even if it means cutting benefits. This is crazy. Numbers get pushed around so that wealthy investors become even wealthier while those on the lower rungs of society - people who actually need help and suport - are left with nowhere to turn.

      We need heart.

      Apparently during the Roman era, people identified themselves with their hearts - i.e. if you asked a Roman where in his body his consciousness was, he would have pointed to his heart. Whether this is true or not, romance and the heart were certainly dominant in the high art of the pre-1700s - Shakespeare, the Renaissance, etc. Now, we're all logic. Cold, calculating logic, stuck in our heads. I believe that only when these two aspects of ourselves are balanced will humanity reach its true potential. I just hope we don't destroy ourselves or our chance on this planet before this happens.

    4. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by Surt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also this idea is a self-fulfilling prophecy. A child who is abused and manipulated is far more likely to abuse and manipulate others as an adult. If you stick a kid in a classroom and humiliate and punish him for any deviance from "the plan", they will try to punish and humiliate those they find who have deviated because they have integrated a fear of deviation into their personalty in order to survive the humiliation and punishment of their teachers..

      This is exactly why the wealthy send their kids to private school. Public school is for the sheep, private school the wolves.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    5. Re:Why is it nobody is happier? by canadian_right · · Score: 2

      Society has a few purposes, one key purpose is to reign in outlandish and destructive behaviour. You should work, you should follow the law, you should get an education, you should not beat up children, etc...

      The other key purpose is mutual support. I don't need to know 50 trades to live, just one. I trade for everything else the other trades provide. Society provides, police, fire-fighters, courts, and many other services paid for collectively.

      A healthy society stops you from doing evil, asks you to refrain from doing bad, and encourages you to do good. An unhealthy society promotes hate, violence, and bigotry. An unhealthy society makes it very difficult to be happy.

      My modern western society, while it can obviously be improved, is a pretty good society. I do not think that my society is preventing me from being happy, or rail-roading me down one narrow path. I look at most of my European "brothers" and I see good societies, in some ways better than my own. I look south and while I see a country that was once a beacon of freedom, I now see a scared, lazy, selfish behemoth slowly sliding into irrelevance.

      Study after study has shown that material goods do not make you happy. Once you are fed, sheltered and clothed it is family, friends, and social interactions that make you happy.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
  22. Re:They treat more than schizophrenia by Manip · · Score: 2

    Exactly what else did the doctor suggest you try? Counselling, Group Theory, Dietary changes? Or was it just, you go in, BANG, prescription for drugs and problem solved?

  23. Re:Placebo effect for hypochondriacs by JamesP · · Score: 2

    Wrong

    They do something. They bind to the receptors and stuff...

    They may be called "placebos" because they don't "fix" the main issue, but they certainly change the chemistry.

    It's like giving ulcer medication to someone with a broken leg.

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  24. It's not my fault!!! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm a victim! It's the environment! My mom was cruel to me! Hormones make me eat too much! Video games make me violent!

    All I need is some understanding. And another pill.

    Or I'll kill you.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  25. Re:bring on the trolls by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    I sometimes wonder if when they cure one disease they invent another. And I mean invent, not discover.

    Some of our neighbors have a three year old boy. He's been diagnosed with some kidney problem I can't even remember, let alone pronounce. And yet he's perfectly healthy.

    Thirty years ago, you'd have just said he needs to pee a lot.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  26. Re:It's our society and pharmaceutical propaganda by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    Insomnia. It's annoying, but it's not worth losing any sleep over.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  27. Re:bring on the trolls by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

    I sometimes wonder if when they cure one disease they invent another. And I mean invent, not discover.

    Some of our neighbors have a three year old boy. He's been diagnosed with some kidney problem I can't even remember, let alone pronounce. And yet he's perfectly healthy.

    Thirty years ago, you'd have just said he needs to pee a lot.

    Idiot. I suppose that you, from your vaunted position as a 'neighbor', can diagnose a disease condition ("some kidney problem") and immediately dismiss it because everything that medicine does is bad. Thirty years ago, someone with high blood pressure or diabetes would be ignored because there wasn't much that we could do about it. Now there is. The incidence of strokes and heart failure is decreasing - not as much as people had suggested - but it's decreasing. Thirty years ago diabetes was a death sentence. Now it's just another chronic disease. But that means that Big Pharma is milking it for all it's worth since we can't 'cure' it.

    There is an amazing amount of black and white thinking here. The world is complex, people more so. Yep, big Pharma is, in part, evil. So is the Law, Medicine, Politics and McDonalds. Sometimes I think the average Slashdotter should really be locked in the basement and left there. FWIW, the Al Jezeera article was pretty lame. It conveniently ignores the fact that human behavior is one of the biggest problems that humans face and we've been trying to chemically modify it for thousands of years (think tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, opium and other 'natural' solutions) and that despite this, we don't have very good tools for doing so.

    Recently, Al Jezeera has made some inroads into good journalism but every now and again, they can't help themselves and revert to type.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  28. The headline is definitely misleading by sl3xd · · Score: 4, Informative

    TFA's headline talks about anti-psychotic medications, yet the article itself is about the entire class of psychoactive drugs.

    Antipsychotics are a small sliver of the class of psycoactive drugs.

    Antidepressants are psychoactive, but they are not anti-psychotic. The same applies for anti-anxiety durgs, such as Xanax, mood stabilizers for bipolar disorder (such as lithium), and for drugs used for Attention Defecit, such as ritalyn.

    The problem is TFA lumps drugs used for depression and anxiety disorders in the same category as drugs used for treating schizophrenia.

    In other words, the headline is misleading. Psychoactive != antipsychotic. The headline is purposefully misleading the reader into thinking that because someone takes a psychoactive drug, they are psychotic, and since americans take a lot of psychoactive drugs, Americans are psychotic.

    This isn't a surprising headline for a news service whose primary audience isn't fond of Americans.

    I'd expect to see the same sort of headline in a Scientologist publication.

    --
    -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    1. Re:The headline is definitely misleading by sjames · · Score: 2

      No, the drugs they mentioned by name are all classified as anti-psychotics even though they get used for other things. They did not include drugs classified as antidepressants in their numbers.

      There is a great deal of crossover in uses including anticonvulsants, antidepressants and antipsychotics. In part that's because they really have no earthly cklue what the diseases are or how the drugs treat (or fail to treat) them. They just try one after the other until the patienmt stops complaining so much and call it good.

      If the rest of medicine worked like psychiatry, people with a broken leg would be given increasing doses of a variety of opiates (often 3 or 4 different ones all at the same time) until they no longer seemed to mind dragging themselves across the floor.

    2. Re:The headline is definitely misleading by kwikrick · · Score: 2

      Yes, these drugs were originally created to cure a specific disorder, however, it seems to me that many psychiatrists take a rather experimental approach to prescribing drugs;they try lots of different drugs on a patient until the patient stops complaining. To cure the side effects, they just add some more drugs to the cocktail. I've seen this happen to a close friend who's stared out with mild depression, was put on various psychoactive drugs, developed various other disorders (I believe due to these drugs) and who almost killed herself by taking an overdose.

      My impression is that psychiatrists do not really know how to diagnose and cure people. I'm not saying these doctors are stupid. Clinical psychology / psychiatry is perhaps one of the most difficult studies and i believe it is basically still in its experimental stage. Definitions and practice are changing all the time. It does seem that definitions of mental disorders are blurring and people are diagnosed a disorders more and more frequently.

      Drug companies are cleverly making use of the doctor's confusion by pushing lots of drugs on the market of which the effects are not really predictable, giving false hope to doctors and patients.

      Beware of well meaning psychiatrists.

      --
      assignment != equality != identity
    3. Re:The headline is definitely misleading by sl3xd · · Score: 2

      You know, I'm not a fan of the pharma industry; but I have to admit they are stuck between a rock and a hard place - on one hand, they have products that really are wonders of the modern era. It takes decades and billions of dollars to research a drug, and even longer to get any sort of governmental approval. Charities they aren't.

      What I can't excuse is the amount of money that's spent on "marketing" these drugs - often several times more than the cost of a drug's development and approval. That is, in my opinion, completely immoral to make a drug take 5-10 times longer to become profitable. The only reason I can think of that shareholders aren't in an uproar is because anybody who complains is "marketed" to with strippers.

      On the other hand, whenever I hear "Big Pharma", my bullshit meter goes off. That's because, more than anything else, it's the catch phrase used by the "Nutritional" industry to sell their snake oil - products with no scientific basis at all, no regulation by any government agency, and a marketing department and expenditures that often puts the pharmaceutical companies to shame - enough that many doctors call them "Big Placebo", which is well earned scorn. People die because of false claims made by the nutritional companies, and unlike a pharmaceutical company, there's no recourse because there's no regulation.

      And, of course, there's Homeopathy, ever railing against "Big Pharma", while conning people into spending obscene amounts of money for purified sugar and water; and killing people conned into believing that water will cure their staph infection. If homeopathy were true, then it's literally full of shit, and is in fact more potent than shit because it's been diluted.

      At least pharmaceutical companies use science to try to help people, and can prove they are providing a real benefit. Nutritional and Homeopathy companies are motivated purely by profit - selling placebos which do nothing but make the customer poorer.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
  29. I'm a shrink and I can tell you why this is... by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 5, Informative

    The expansion of antipsychotic use has nothing to do with the number of people being diagnosed with psychotic disorders. AFAIK, that number hasn't increased much.

    The real reason is that over the past 10 or 15 years, antipsychotic meds (i.e. dopamine antagonists) have been used with increasing frequency in patients who do NOT have psychotic symptoms. ("Psychotic symptoms" basically means either hallucinations or delusional thinking). Many of these meds are marketed as "mood stabilizers" for bipolar disorder-- and the criteria for bipolar disorder are so broad and so subjective that just about anyone can be diagnosed with it. Indeed, one of the popular "screening tools" for bipolar disorder is something called the Mood Disorders Questionnaire, which is a bit like those Scientology quizzes that tells you whether Scientology is right for you. (It always is). The MDQ was designed by doctors who work for drug companies-- I've met one of them.

    There are three other groups who tend to get lots of antipsychotics-- the elderly (especially in nursing homes), the mentally retarded, and people with plain old depression. The last one is actually the easiest to justify, since there are some studies which suggest that certain antipsychotics can work as adjunctive treatment for depression-- they have managed to get FDA approval for that indication. The first two-- elderly and MR-- are impossible to defend. They don't benefit the patient, they cause cognitive slowing and deterioration of functioning, and they increase overall mortality. Lilly in particular has been guilty of marketing their antipsychotic (Zyprexa) to nursing homes and claiming that it improves "behavioral disturbances of dementia". It doesn't, and they eventually had to pay out billions of dollars in fines.

    Any psychiatrist with half a brain knows what's going on here. In the mid 90s all the new antidepressants (Prozac, etc) started to go off-patent and the drug companies lost a major cash cow. Ever since then, the drug companies have sought new indications for dopamine blockers, since they are mostly still on-patent, and most of them are fiendishly expensive.

    1. Re:I'm a shrink and I can tell you why this is... by supersonic75 · · Score: 2

      Some words on this:

      I think that it's important to acknowledge that ALL antipsychotics are basically just fancy sedatives. Don't let you anyone tell you otherwise (i.e., that the newer antipsychotics "pinpoint symptoms" like auditory or visual hallucinations, etc). They serve one purpose, and one purpose only and that is to dull the brain down (which in turn may or may not have an efficacious effect on symptoms of psychosis and subsequent behavior). We have not really come all that far since Thorazine except to have improved (some) of the side effects (if an MD wants to argue this, I'll be happy to substantiate my point on every level, including molecular). Sometimes the meds help people, sometimes not.

      So while I appreciate what Pickens reports, I also think it's important to understand that these drugs are used to serve many purposes; however, I think that the reason why they are being prescribed in such vast quantities is more emblematic of the times than anything else. Nobody really wants to work with out-of-control behavior when one can simply dispense a pill. I recently worked with a patient who served some time at Riker's last year for trafficking, and he told me that "EVERYONE is given Seroquel (an antipsychotic known for its sedating effects, particularly in a non-psychotic population) at night to keep them calm". This man was a credible source of information, and I was pretty shocked at his report. There used to be a real stigma attached to these drugs (obviously I'm not saying that's a good thing), but now they're becoming household names in certain populations.

      The whole notion of giving antispychotics to kids scares the hell out of me on a lot of levels, especially when it comes to brain plasticity at a young age. It can really fuck them up, and they often learn nothing about their own behavior (unless by some stroke of luck they have a talented and caring counselor or therapist). I've assessed 12 to 15 year-old girls who do quite well in school and have friends, but who come from very hard family or otherwise challenging backgrounds whom are prescribed alarmingly high doses of antipsychotics (as well as antidepressants), when in fact they have NO psychotic symptoms whatsoever but merely conduct and behavioral issues.

      In addition to this, their families are sometimes eager to have them hospitalized so that they can get a little "vacation" away from the kid. Once the child is on a psychiatric inpatient unit, they are going to damn well get pretty serious meds 99% of the time, because that's how it's done. So now you have a child who is an identified patient and whom is usually misdiagnosed, so that insurance will pay for the treatment and meds (this is the same reason why the elderly earn these diagnoses; nursing homes need to get paid for the meds that they use to keep them calm). The diagnoses "Schizophrenia" and particularly "Bipolar Disorder" are tossed around like they were the common cold, and when I ask these patients (young and older alike) if they know what it means to have these disorders, at least 75 % of them have absolutely no idea. I once had a young woman break down in tears in the Psychiatric ER, because I said to her, "you're not Bipolar and the sooner you can think of yourself as being an extremely emotional person and not a sick one, the better you might start to feel." She's in individual therapy and has been doing pretty well for over 3 years. She used to thank me every time I'd run into her in the hospital.

      I also worry about and hate the fact that these extremely powerful meds are being dispensed by (often well-meaning) health professionals who have very little psych training, and applaud clinicians that have the wherewithal and resources (sadly a lucky few) to continue to experiment with alternatives to psych meds, or at least administer them as a last resort rather than a first line of defense.

      At any rate, just wanted to weigh in.

  30. Funny by Das+Auge · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's funny when you think about it. Some Americans take drugs to feel better about themselves, but non-Americans talk shit about Americans to make them feel better about themselves. Well, I guess the later is cheaper...

  31. Kinda Right by no1home · · Score: 2

    While of course it is a strong overstatement to say all of us Americans are insane in some way, it is true that Big Pharma and our simplistic views of life are turning us into mass consumers of psychotropic medications, legally.

    In some ways, I was one of those the system tried to abuse. I say that not to inflame the argument- I know the people involved did not INTEND to do me harm. Luckily for me, I have good parents who resisted the BS. Way back in early grade school, they said I was having trouble and that I should be put on Ritalin, that I had ADD or ADHD. My mother, being smart person who can think for herself, looked at the situation and removed most of the processed sugar junk from my diet. I got sufficiently better that the matter was closed.

    But wait! There's more! It turns out I am one of those unlucky few who actually was born bipolar! 35 years ago, we didn't really know these things, so I went without diagnosis, let alone treatment. And the argument still rages, can a child BE bipolar? (My case is a clear argument that, yes, a child can be bipolar).

    And there's still more! Once I was properly diagnosed, by two separate, unrelated psychiatrists who were unaware of each others diagnosis (I call it the 'blind taste test method of diagnosis), I began treatment. Over a decade of trying this, that, and the other medication. You know what finally worked? Testosterone replacement therapy and vitamin-B complex, along with some mental trickery I do for myself. This is MY solution and not medical advice. But the idea is, they mostly want to sell you drugs, expensive drugs. You MUST take control and find the underlying cause for yourself! And you must be intelligent about it.

    Which leads me to...

    RANT ON

    I don't see much hope these days. I work closely with the public and it makes me want to kill. It makes me want to remove the right to vote and breed. It makes me um... depressed... again. Americans want to blame an external source for their problems and take a magic pill to make it all better. I know this. I went through that phase of trying to find something outside of me that made me screwed up and I wanted an instant fix for it. Most Americans, it seems, don't get past that phase- ever. It's the immigrant's fault. It's my spouse's fault. It's my parent's fault. As I told an ex of mine many years ago, so the fuck what! You're an adult now. Act like one and figure your shit out; take responsibility for who you are today and make yourself better. Ask for help if need be, of course. I had to and it worked. My shrink helped me figure out the testosterone issue. She's one of the good ones.

    So is Big Pharma really to blame? Or are they just capitalizing on our nature? That's a trick question. We are BOTH to blame.

    RANT OFF

    I apologize for the rant. This is a sore subject for me and working with the public the last several years has not helped! :) But try to imagine the conversation I have to have sometimes:
    Me: I'm bipolar.
    Them: Ya, so is everyone else these days.
    Me: Yes, I know. It's being WAY over-diagnosed now, but I really am.
    Them: Yep, they all say that too now.

    If they only knew the real pain. The guilt of the pain my disease has caused others. Hell, they still wouldn't give a shit. Many of is Americans are too self-absorbed to notice. I wonder if there's a pill for that...

    --
    I hope this comment is well received... I could have moderated instead!

    Persecutors will be violated!
  32. No need to despair! by mevets · · Score: 2

    There are a variety of anti-psychotic pharmaceuticals that can help straighten you on your keel. Talk to your doctor about Cannabidiol today.

    * side effects may included drowsiness, hunger, giggling, Pink Floyd, intense focus, preoccupation with Bruce Lee, socialist leanings, belief in conspiracy theories, and enjoyment of life. If you experience any of these side effects, Cannabidiol may be just the thing for you.

  33. We are living in a very unnatural world by itsphilip · · Score: 2

    First off, not all of the drugs listed are antipsychotics. Second, a lot of people need these drugs. Humans have evolved to wake up with the sun, and go to sleep not too long after sunset. Now we stay up all night. Naturally, that's going to make you a little bit crazy. 10,000 years ago, we didn't eat lots of carbs or ingest loads of chemicals, we ate natural fruits, veggies, and meat. Most of us now don't have to worry about hunting or foraging, and now that the desperate struggle for survival is over for many of us, we have time to look inward and think about thoughts and emotions. I don't know about you guys, but any time I have time to look inward and deal with emotions, I go a little bit bananas. That's why we need an unnatural solution in many cases to help us cope with this incredibly unnatural world. It's not worth freaking out over; take a Xanax and chill :-).

  34. Addiction by Msdose · · Score: 2

    The vast majority of the over-prescribed drugs have no medical efficacy. The only quality they have is that they are addictive. The drug companies see this as their business model, and so produce new addictive products. Their control of the government protects them from low cost competition (DEA) at a cost to the taxpayer of 100 billion dollars a year. The government forces users to obtain their drugs from pushers, who steer them toward the most addictive (profitable) drugs. So the drug companies use doctors as pushers. In Canada, doctors write huge numbers of prescriptions for drugs which the government pays for (especially Oxycontin), then sell them out the back door for cash.