Microsoft Developer Made the Most Changes To Linux 3.0 Code
sfcrazy sends this quote from the H:
"The 343 changes made by Microsoft developer K. Y. Srinivasan put him at the top of a list, created by LWN.net, of developers who made the most changes in the current development cycle for Linux 3.0. Along with a number of other 'change sets,' Microsoft provided a total of 361 changes, putting it in seventh place on the list of companies and groups that contributed code to the Linux kernel. By comparison, independent developers provided 1,085 change sets to Linux 3.0, while Red Hat provided 1,000 and Intel 839."
Microsoft contributed stuff so their code would work.
Does it make "linux" better? No.
Does it allow THEIR code to work? Yes.
This "one developer" who contributed it all. Is he the guy who wrote it all... or the guy Microsoft said "Hey you'll be submitting the team's contributions"?
I know it's supposed to be fanboi-good for me to say Microsoft Bad, Google Good, Linux good. Fortunately I believe this.
Microsoft bad.
Google good.
Linux good.
If you feel differently go to backslashdot.com.
E