Slashdot Mirror


Could the KGB Infiltrate LulzSec?

Barence writes "Foreign powers could try to infiltrate hacktivist networks in order to manipulate their actions, according to a security expert who advises governments and businesses on internet issues. Likening the emergence of the hacktivist movement to the arrival of militant groups such as the Red Brigade during the 1970s, government advisor and chair of the International E-crime Congress, Simon Moores, said that hacker groups could eventually be swayed by outside influences. 'If you have a LulzSec or an Anonymous that is perhaps being manipulated by a foreign actor, it takes us back to the days of the Stasi and the KGB, which were manipulating [anti-nuclear campaign group] CND quite easily from Moscow,' he said."

27 of 162 comments (clear)

  1. Not this shit again. by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously!

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    1. Re:Not this shit again. by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2

      Note, though, that it was also apparently an unintended side-effect of an effort to promote anti-nuclear weapons fears in the West.

      Which bit them in the ass when Chernobyl suffered a minor incident, and their puppets blew it up out of all proportion.

  2. Outdated Headline by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Could the KGB Infiltrate LulzSec?

    No, because it was dissolved in 1991. Could the SVR, FSB or GRU infiltrate LulzSec? Sure, why not? I'm sure anyone could infiltrate the group as long as you're willing to play their game.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Outdated Headline by Threni · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He means `can we get some Cold War eta funding to go on a wild goose chase, please'.

    2. Re:Outdated Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless you live in Belarus, where the KGB is still called just that.

    3. Re:Outdated Headline by vajrabum · · Score: 2

      C'mon Communist infiltrators? Really? I can see sophmoric but you seem to think the Lulzsec people are stupid or something. This is cointel PR bs like we saw in the 60s. Your clue, if you decide to accept it, is that the TFA didn't refer to the current foreign intelligence organizations but rather to the great boogie man of the cold war, the KGB.

    4. Re:Outdated Headline by frosty_tsm · · Score: 2

      Any good strategist knows you can't just sit in a fortress and remain safe forever. The same applies here.

      Not really. You can't sit in a fortress forever because:

      • You are dependent on food from outside
      • The enemy will travel and pillage as they please on your land
      • The enemy can starve you out
      • Being couped up in a fortress might make your people not like you so much

      None of these apply to a well-secured data center (except maybe some people will be annoyed their password can't be 1234..5).

  3. but anonymous is magic by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    no one can figure out who anyone is in real life, it can never be killed, and never influenced. it is above and beyond the rules that govern any other group of people, because it has internets. right?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:but anonymous is magic by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      anonymous is the borg!

      pffffffft

      will you fanboys please shut up about magic anonymous? it's governed by the same simple social hacks everyone and everything is. it's not more vulnerable, it's not less vulnerable. there is no magic pixie dust. it has not reinvented the human social function or the rules by which every group of human beings has always behaved since the dawn of time

      sorry to rain on your parade

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  4. great fear tactic by alphatel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Meanwhile Russia can shutdown the US power grid, successfully leached Nuclear secrets in the 50's and owns most of US Steel manufacturing. Yet some shitty hacker outfit called Lulzsec is "easily manipulated. Har! Is it Pirate Day already?

    --
    When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    1. Re:great fear tactic by vlm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Meanwhile Russia can shutdown the US power grid, successfully leached Nuclear secrets in the 50's and owns most of US Steel manufacturing. Yet some shitty hacker outfit called Lulzsec is "easily manipulated. Har! Is it Pirate Day already?

      Whoever will take more of my money and more of my civil rights will surely save me.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:great fear tactic by bberens · · Score: 2

      I'm willing to take both.

      --
      Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
  5. What about? by Broken+scope · · Score: 4, Informative

    So could the CIA, NSA, FBI or any of the 20 or 30 Intelligence/enforcement agencies in the US government.

    What is to say that this hasn't already happened and everything we have seen has been... "just as planned."

    Oh look at me! I can speculate too!

    --
    You mad
    1. Re:What about? by arth1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So could the CIA, NSA, FBI or any of the 20 or 30 Intelligence/enforcement agencies in the US government.

      Yes, LulzSec is clearly commandeered by the Amtrak Police.
      Geohot, on the other hand, is likely under the influence of the Forest Rangers.

      Why this hits /. front page, I have no idea. Whenever someone is doing something controversial, there will always be opponents who will speculate that they're useful idiots, or otherwise try to paint them in a worse light than they already are. I'd be interested in the real source of this one; my bet is you'll find a tinfoil hat reactionary.

    2. Re:What about? by loftwyr · · Score: 2

      Are you saying that someone could join a security or military organization, download key secret documents and give them to an organization, say, like Wikileaks? I don't believe you! America is too strong for that kind of thing!

  6. Yet Another Lack of Understanding by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Law enforcement just can't grasp the concept of Anonymous' lack of a solid hierarchy. Sure they could infiltrate Anonymous, and they'd have as much influence as any other one participant, which is very little. Now if they can flood Anonymous with enough sockpuppets to make up, say, more than 50% of the participants, then they'd have some meaningful influence.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Yet Another Lack of Understanding by Vectormatic · · Score: 3, Informative

      I will admit i know nothing about anonymous or lulzsec, but it wouldnt surprise if they worked like your basic internet echo chamber. If the right guy starts screaming the right way, all the other members start parroting and going along. I dont claim that this would be easy, but the lack of hierarchy doesnt preclude one person having influence over a large amount of followers.

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    2. Re:Yet Another Lack of Understanding by Spad · · Score: 2

      The phrase that leaps to mind is "like herding cats".

    3. Re:Yet Another Lack of Understanding by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 2

      Law enforcement just can't grasp the concept of Anonymous' lack of a solid hierarchy.

      This sentence relies on a vast web of assumptions. Where does your knowledge of the hierarchy of "Anonymous" come from? It comes from Anonymous. Actually, no, worse-- it comes from spokespersons who claim (without proof) to be representing Anonymous. Is there any actual reason to believe anything about Anonymous, or how it is structured?

      Sure they could infiltrate Anonymous, and they'd have as much influence as any other one participant, which is very little.

      This sentence relies on a vast web of assumptions, the main one of which is the belief that, even in the absence of a hierarchy, all participants have equal amounts of influence. In the real world, some people are more equal than others. So, here's the question: suppose there were a secret organization with vast resources that were pretending to be "just another participant," but in fact had a practical knowledge of politics, which is to say: means and methods of how to influence decisions without overtly seeming to. Would they be able to influence a community of politically naive engineer/hacker/teenager/angry-young-men/prankster/techno-anarchists?

      The answer to that question is: I don't know.

      However, I don't think that you can say a-priori that they would not be able to do so.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  7. No by ewanm89 · · Score: 4, Informative

    One, the KGB doesn't exist anymore, 2) neither does LulzSec (technically), but even if it doesn't work like that, every single member (I use this loosely as anonymous doesn't really have members) can decide whether to take part in a particular action or not.

  8. Re:Is it worth it? by Smallpond · · Score: 4, Informative
  9. Obligatory Meme... by cjb658 · · Score: 3, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, the government hacks LulzSec!

  10. An interesting read by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I highly recommend "Comrade J" by Pete Earley. http://www.amazon.com/Comrade-J-Pete-Earley/dp/B002BWQ5PY/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1311602623&sr=8-1
    This book talks about the genesis of the SVR from the KGB. It also talks about how the whole concept of "nuclear winter" was invented by those agencies and fed to gullible westerners including Carl Sagan who steadfastly refused to believe it when NASA scientists debunked the whole thing. It also talks about what a colossal disaster the UN Oil for Food program was, who was duped, who profited from it, and more importantly who was pulling the strings. Bottom line is that foreign intelligence services don't need to do anything directly. There are plenty of idealists willing to do their dirty work.

  11. Nuclear Winter valid concept. by FatSean · · Score: 2

    Seems like Pete Earley has a book to sell!

    --
    Blar.
  12. This is silly on so many levels by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Ok, I'll try to get some order into it, starting with the most obvious one.

    1. The KGB (or rather, its successor, or whatever organization you'd think) isn't interested in such petty things. They have their own guys, and they can more easily steer them in the "right" direction. Why? Because that guy is sitting right there and you can cap him if he doesn't.

    2. They also have the money to simply buy such people. And then put them under the gun for a "hack that or else".

    3. They also have no need to "hide" anything so they'd profit from people doing it who are not in Russia. Russia is one of the biggest perpetrators in the world when it comes to cybercrime, do you want to blame all of that on the KGB or the Russian government? Unless you assume that the organized crime actually is the government in Russia, you're probably wrong. Think they'd bother to "hide" that there's yet another Russian hacking something on the planet for fun an profit?

    4. But even assuming they'd have any interest in Anonymous: Anonymous is the equivalent of an internet mob. They are not an organized system with a hierarchy and whatnot. Steering a mob is possible to some degree, you can convince them to trash something belonging to company A instead of something belonging to company B, provided they hate both companies at similar levels, but turning them around and making them a neighborhood watch or at least convincing them to trash a place they'd actually like is something you will not accomplish. You can essentially only steer a mob into attacking something they already hate. If you're that thing they hate, it's kinda hard to steer them.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  13. RED BRIGADES? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Informative

    They were subverted manipulated, alright.

    By US and NATO operatives. Not godless commies.

    The kidnap and murder of the Italian Prime Minister, Aldo Moro, was an orchestrated event, calculated to drive Socialist-leaning Italy to the right. This was done through direct and indirect instruction by CIA managed "terrorists", according to a design by Henry Kissinger - among others.

    "In 1949, the CIA helped set up the Italian secret armed forces intelligence unit, named SIFAR, staffed in part with former members of Mussolini's secret police. It later changed its name to SID. At the end of World War 2, a former Nazi collaborator, Licio Gelli, was facing execution for his activities during the war, but managed to escape by joining the US Army Counter-Intelligence Corps. In the 1950s, Gelli was recruited by SIFAR. Gelli was also head of the P2 Masonic Lodge in Italy, and in 1969, he developed close ties with General Alexander Haig, who was then Assistant to National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger. Through this network, Gelli became chief intermediary between the CIA and General De Lorenzo, Chief of the SID."

    "The Red Brigades were a leftist Italian terrorist organization that was formed in 1970. In 1974, Red Brigade founders Renato Curcio and Alberto Franceschini were arrested. Alberto Franceschini later accused a top member of the Red Brigades, Mario Moretti, of turning them in, and that both Moretti and another leading Red Brigade member, Giovanni Senzani, were spies for the Italian and US secret services. Moretti rose up through the ranks of the Red Brigades as a result of the arrest of the two founders."

    "The Red Brigades worked closely with the Hyperion Language School in Paris, which was founded by Corrado Simioni, Duccio Berio and Mario Moretti. Corrado Simoni had worked for the CIA at Radio Free Europe, Duccio Berio had been supplying the Italian SID with information of leftist groups and Mario Moretti, apart from being accused by the Red Brigades founders as being an intelligence asset, also happened to be the mastermind and murderer of former Italian Prime Minister, Aldo Moro. An Italian police report referred to the Hyperion Language School as âoethe most important CIA office in Europe." "

    I guarantee you, behind Anders Breitvik is a NATO clandestine operation. The use of Freemasons is a good tipoff. It introduces incredulity when introduced to investigations - while actually providing a secret organisational structure and ritual omerta to enforce obedience.

    You've seen this picture, right?

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:RED BRIGADES? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2
      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."