Slashdot Mirror


LulzSec Calls For PayPal Boycott, Spokesman Arrested

An anonymous reader writes "British police have arrested a 19-year-old man believed to be 'Topiary', the official spokesperson of the LulzSec hactivist group. The man was arrested at his home in the Shetland Islands earlier today (July 27), and is being transported to a central London police station." Also today, LulzSec has called for a boycott of PayPal saying “We encourage anyone using PayPal to immediately close their accounts and consider an alternative.”

3 of 425 comments (clear)

  1. Re:do alternatives exist? by hideouspenguinboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A lot of my farm customers have started asking me to accept these folks - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwolla It's the worst named thing I've ever encountered, but apart from that it looks ok. They are a pretty new company, but growing fast. I did create an account with them, but have yet to accept payment using them.

  2. Re:Umm. No credibility by Cederic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Last night I explicitly chose not to buy something online because the vendor only accepted PayPal payments.

    He lost a $425 sale, I lost the chance to buy an item I wanted. PayPal lost credibility with the vendor; they had none with me from the outset.

    I agree that they're in a largely monopoly position. I hate that but it doesn't make me play with them. Fuck 'em, and their obnoxious anti-consumerist scams.

  3. Re:Alternative? by nedlohs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You are complaining that they are "stealing" your money even though you haven't given them proof of who you are.

    If they want proof of ID, then they should ask for it up front - not when they have money and I have no option. Of course they won't return the money to the sender either.

    http://www.moneybookers.com/app/help.pl?s=laundering

    Do you read things before you sign up? And why should they ask for ID before legally required too, you want them to go beyond what the law requires?

    Unlike PayPal, who you would also be sending your ID to, at a random address, Moneybookers is regulated.

    Show me the regulation that says that they get to keep any money?

    http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R1781:en:NOT

    Your money is sitting in that account because you are a retard, not because they are thieves.

    They are thieves. They won't give me my money and they won't give it to the person that sent it. And they demand that I send them a photocopy of a document that can be used to open bank accounts (real ones), apply to loans, and lot of other things. If you think I'm being a retard for not sending them that document, then will, go fuck yourself and send them yours.

    They can't give you your money because doing so without documenting your identity is against the law. They can't give it to the person who sent it because that would also be against the law if they don't have your ID on record. They aren't thieves because they haven't kept the money for themselves, it is sitting there waiting for someone to provide the identification the law requires in order to transfer it.

    And yes that ID is just what you would need to open a bank account. Which is obvious, since the bank wants the same ID for the exact same reason - the same laws apply to them.