Slashdot Mirror


Belarus Cracks Down On VKontakte

decora writes "On several recent Wednesdays, Russian language social networking site Vkontakte has been blocked by the government of Belarus. The blocks are partly to prevent the organization of 'Silent Protests,' in which citizens gather in city squares, and clap in protest against president Alexander Lukashenko. The government has designated the people involved as "social network revolutionaries" and charged many with disorderly conduct. One VKontakte user, Mikhail Karatkevich, is to be put on trial August 10 for 'organizing a mass rally' after he posted a meeting notice onto his page. According to Charter 97, the regime has even set up fake proxy servers to capture the unwitting; Tor is the suggested solution."

5 of 111 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Belarusians deserve this by roman_mir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now, when even Russia has moved towards democracy and continues to have one of the most liberal economies in the world

    - wow, what a load of crap! What does it mean 'liberal' in this context? What Russia has today is an insanely controlling top heavy government, which is involved in shaking down all of the businesses that are not the largest raw material and energy exporters. You can't do business in Russia if you actually follow the rules, you will never make a single ruble of profit by following the rules, which are almost on purpose designed to discourage any business activity. You can only do business in Russia if you do things in various shady to semi-shady ways, only then you can actually have some profit, and I believe this is done on purpose, so that nobody can be 'crystal clear' and everybody always has something that he can be incriminated with, because that's the way the government likes it - making sure they can always throw you behind bars and confiscate your business, which they often do. Of-course they can do it even without finding anything actually shady, they can come up with insane 'evidence' and people who will support it and put you behind bars regardless of any evidence, and the courts are told what to do.

    If THAT is what you consider liberal, then it's liberal.

  2. Not that surprising from Belarus by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Journalists who visit Belarus (and there are very few that are allowed) often come back saying that Belarus is the last Soviet republic. One party system, state controls everything, massive corruption, deteriorating everything, you name it. All the negatives of soviet style communism with none of the positives of actual Marxist ideals. People are often rated as being more free to criticize their government in China, Cuba, or Iran than they are in Belarus.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Not that surprising from Belarus by royallthefourth · · Score: 5, Informative

      All the negatives of soviet style communism with none of the positives

      Belarus avoided the collapse that plagued all other former Soviet republics (including Russia) by keeping its system intact and has a higher standard of living than the others because of it.
      http://www.elenastravel.com/cgi-bin/view.cgi?action=belarus#eco

      Better to have a corrupt dictator running the country who otherwise believes in what he's doing than to have normal business interests running things, it seems.

    2. Re:Not that surprising from Belarus by royallthefourth · · Score: 2

      Free how? In the USA it's free to be homeless if you can't find a job. But apparently Belorussians will all be slaves until they have unrestricted access to Facebook.
      You disrespect all who have suffered in slavery.

    3. Re:Not that surprising from Belarus by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      if you don't have freedom of political expression, you are a slave

      it's not about facebook, it's about the right to speak your mind and to choose your government. if you can't choose your government or openly criticize it, yes, you are a slave

      that is not disrespectful of the history of slavery, it is an accurate word to use to describe the use of power in despotism: all citizens are slaves. you have no rights. 100% accurate: you are a slave. i am not cheapening the word or disrespecting the history of slavery, i am accurately describing the state of the freedoms and rights of those who live under despotism

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it