Slashdot Mirror


World Wide Web Turns 20 Today

girlmad writes "On 6 August 1991, Sir Tim Berners-Lee, then a humble scientist at CERN, made the first page on the World Wide Web publicly available in a move that, unbeknown to him at the time, would change the world more quickly and profoundly than anything before or since." Wired also has a retrospective, noting that "[i]t can be hard now, even for many of us who regularly used the Internet before there was a World Wide Web, to remember that there was a time when the two terms weren’t considered nearly synonymous by the general public." For those who remember, what was your first experience with the Web per se? For me, it was in 1993 or early 1994, with an excited demonstration of Mosaic on Sun workstations in the Geology department at the University of Texas.

169 comments

  1. It was one of many protocols in '91/'92 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    During fall of 1991 and 1992, the World Wide Web ended up as one of many protocols one used to find information. At the time, you had multiple protocols -- gopher, FTP, heck, even some places like wuarchive had public NFS mounts. For searches, you had archie and veronics (for the gopherspace).

    The first time I used a Web browser was on a NeXT, and the first Web server I used was MacHTTPD on a cast off Performa.

    I feel old now...

    1. Re:It was one of many protocols in '91/'92 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      no no, it's all peace and love and BBQ unicorn ribs with pony-sauce on the web

    2. Re:It was one of many protocols in '91/'92 by Warwick+Allison · · Score: 1

      I'm reading Slashdot through a WAIS proxy server!

    3. Re:It was one of many protocols in '91/'92 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm really surprised this was modded down - it's an insightful commentary on one of the consequences of the Web that couldn't possibly have been anticipated, much like the communications technologies before it also changed the world.

      Then again, it talks down on the Tea Party, and we already established previously that they've got a group of people playing the modpoint lottery with fake/spam accounts.

    4. Re:It was one of many protocols in '91/'92 by mcavic · · Score: 1

      I regularly surfed wiretap.spies.com via Gopher. I don't remember exactly what the content was, but I'm sorry it's gone. I occasionally used wuarchive via NFS, but more often via FTP. University of Paderborn had a good FTP site too. My first two Internet email addresses were provided by CompuServe and Delphi. And, I was there when anon.penet.fi shut down.

  2. My First Online Experience by broggyr · · Score: 1

    My first experience going online was Prodigy, and the first website I ever visited was www.discovery.com, circa 1996ish

    --
    Irony? Yea, it's like goldy and bronzy, only it's made of iron!
    1. Re:My First Online Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Mine was using Archie to find porn - back then, they were all stills, in the snow, uphill, both ways!

    2. Re:My First Online Experience by Moryath · · Score: 1

      You'd think with both Betty and Veronica trying to get after him, he'd have no need for porn.

    3. Re:My First Online Experience by kerashi · · Score: 1

      My first experience going online was also with Prodigy, which my parents promptly cancelled after they got the telephone bill with all the long distance charges. It wasn't till 97 when I turned 18 and moved out of the sticks that I was able to get on again, with a 56k dialup modem.

    4. Re:My First Online Experience by JustOK · · Score: 1

      did u see the one with "Big" Moose? and the one where u can tell why they call him "JUG" head?

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    5. Re:My First Online Experience by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Thanks, kids, Now I feel REALLY old. I was 31 when I first got on line, that was in 1983 on Compuserve. To tell the truth, it was pretty useless -- but so were both of my computers, a TS-1000 and a TRS-80 MC10, neither of which had any decent software I didn't write myself. I sold a little software for the MC10 after putting a classified in (IIRC) Byte Magazine. God but getting Compuserve cancelled was hard!

      I was on BBSes around 88 or 89 after I bought a used IBM-XT. That and shareware got me into computer games.

      Back then you couldn't get on the internet without a credit card, and we were dirt poor and didn't have one. In '97 Family Video offered internet access, unlimited access for $12 per month and you could pay cash, and they weren't kidding about unlimited. It came with hosting, and I abused the hell out of it with my 33.6 modem. I made web pages for my favorite games, and some teenager emailed me asking if I played Quake. Of course I played Quake! He encouraged me to make a Quake page; I guess I was good at it, because I got emails about my Road Rash site from people who thought it was EA's site.

      The Quake site was the one I abused Family Video with. I uploaded patches, skins, maps, you name it. FV's servers must have been pretty fast, because some folks told me they'd wait until I uploaded a patch because it would download faster.

      I was pretty proud of that site. A couple months after starting it I submitted an article to Planet Quake, who posted it with a link to my site and it really took off after that. Everybody was linking me; Blue's News would have a link every couple of weeks or so. I got to where I spent a lot more time on the site than playing Quake!

      My youngest, Patty, was a fan of online Roger Rabbit, and one day she came to me with wide etes and said "dad, did you know you were famous?" Seems a lot of the kids were my fans!

      Man, I had a lot of fun back then, especially after I had a boss who discovered I was doing things at work that people earning three times what I was couldn't, and got me a big promotion and raise. So we bought a big house on 7th street, Evil-X went to school and pretty much didn't spend any time at all with the kids and me, and she wound up moving out.

      Yeah, I'm putting the Paxil Diaries in book form. I promise! For you who aren't acquainted, I'd joined /. (which started about the same time as the Springfield Fragfest, my Quake site) but didn't post much; I was too busy with Quake. After Evil-X moved out I started posting diaries on K5; that was the Paxil Diaries. They were about music, reefer, drinking, and unsuccessfully chasing women.

      Patty and Leila are still big into gaming; Patty's assistant manager of a GameStop now. Tell her "hi" if you see her, she's the hot 24 year old with a treble clef tattood on one arm and a bass clef on the other. Her picture's on my Google+ page.

      Most of you guys are probably not much older than them, and a lot of you are even younger. No, I won;t tell you to get off my lawn. Especially if you hand me a beer or a lit joint.

    6. Re:My First Online Experience by davester666 · · Score: 1

      I always loved those nice ASCII hills...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    7. Re:My First Online Experience by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mine was using Archie to find porn - back then, they were all stills, in the snow, uphill, both ways!

      My favorite definition of Broadband: "Now your porn can move!"

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    8. Re:My First Online Experience by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      I used to play the "How can I get Net access for free" - game and was pretty good at it until about mid 00s. I remember starting out with newsgroups and email around 87 and BBS while I was still at school in 83. TRS-80 (Model 1 :-), C64 and TRS-80 Color Computer, a System-80 with a S-100 bus and of course my original IBM PC with cassette interface and basic roms on board (which, incidentally, still powered up until a few years ago when I chucked it out).

      Yep, I got picked on a school but I knew what interested me and was fun. I'm glad I stuck with it, who'd ever think nerd culture would become cool now and so profitable during the 90's. Though I'm not one of the pioneers I'm certainly glad to have built some small parts.

      I wonder what it will look like in another 20 years?

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  3. my brother installed some stuff on 3.11 by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    my brother installed some stuff on 3.11 that had what I guess tcp/ip stack(slip probably) and a browser that worked with it, I don't remember it's name but it wasn't netscape for sure and it wasn't trumpet which did the tcp/ip, of that I'm fairly sure. the first real internet was on this one bbs that had early linux connected to internet available for members, later it turned into more of a smalltime isp, moved away from that to different provider for isdn access. why can't web pages be more like they were with around when netscape 2.0 got out? content was king once, not the layout.. also early on, why was everything available for linux so well? realplayers and all - it's like 1995 was the year of linux on desktop.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:my brother installed some stuff on 3.11 by i.am.delf · · Score: 1
      I remember all of this as well. My first experience seeing the web was at the JPL open house in 1993. The pages they had loaded up were JPL, NCSA and CERN. I remember my first thoughts were its like gopher but with inline pictures.

      I'm sure everyone wants to forget the pain of the old days too. Installing trumpet stack on your Windows 3.1 box and then struggling for days trying to figure out what was going wrong. Oh and don't forget having to install the 32-bit extension on to old 16-bit Windows so that you could use NCSA Mosaic/Mozilla.

    2. Re:my brother installed some stuff on 3.11 by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

      Trumpet winsock or whatever most likely. That's what I had to use. And I remember downloading a game (can't remember which) from happy puppy on a 2400 baud modem. Left it to download over night only to find out the connection dropped for whatever reason at 900k of the 1.2 M game. That's sucked!

    3. Re:my brother installed some stuff on 3.11 by dotwhynot · · Score: 1

      my brother installed some stuff on 3.11 that had what I guess tcp/ip stack(slip probably) and a browser that worked with it, I don't remember it's name but it wasn't netscape for sure and it wasn't trumpet which did the tcp/ip, of that I'm fairly sure. the first real internet was on this one bbs that had early linux connected to internet available for members, later it turned into more of a smalltime isp, moved away from that to different provider for isdn access. why can't web pages be more like they were with around when netscape 2.0 got out? content was king once, not the layout.. also early on, why was everything available for linux so well? realplayers and all - it's like 1995 was the year of linux on desktop.

      This might very well have been Spry Internet in a Box. Used it myself, was a very good product at the time. It included a full winsock tcp/ip stack, and AirMosaic browser, in addition to clients for Usenet, Telnet, Gopher, FTP and email.

  4. My first Internet and Web Experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My first experience with the Internet was when I brought home a computer and modem from work and opened an Internet access account with IBM (now part of AT&T's network) back in 1994. At the time I didn't know what a browser was, so no web at that point. At the time I was using OS/2 and had the Internet Access Kit installed, so I had some Internet-related applications to use. I spent a few weeks using Gopher reading various texts, but at the time local BBS's were far more developed and easier to use, plus included Fidonet which I downloaded "mail" from to read offline with my Bluewave reader. I cancelled that account. A couple of months went by and I learned about something called Netscape and an OS/2 specific browser from IBM called WebExplorer. I opened my account again with IBM, downloaded WebExplorer, and had a ball. As I recall I ran Netscape under WinOS/2 for a while until there was an OS/2 specific version, but mostly I used (and build pages for) WebExplorer.

  5. About the same time for me too by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    really big in the local bbs's someone tipped us off that the public library had hooked up their card catalog bbs service to the internet and was offering web access though lynx ... it was fucking awesome

  6. Ahh ... good times ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I certainly remember seeing NCSA Mosaic for the first time.

    But I also remember downloading stuff from the usenet alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.* newsgroups and needing to edit out the headers, cat them together, and then run the whole thing through uudecode. Good times -- that's partly how I learned vi. ;-)

    Oh, and of course both UUCP bang path addressing as well as the funky ones we had on the VAXes at school to translate from DECNet or whatever it was ... IN% or something before what we'd recognize now as a proper email address.

    ftp.sunsite,unc.edu ... the ftp repository at White Sands Missile Range

    Oooh, and SLIP on a Linux box ... that was pretty awesome. There was a lot of "internet" stuff before most anybody knew about the "world wide web". I remember trying to explain it to people in the way back, and getting looked at like I'd gone off my rocker.

    And I didn't even need pants. ;-)

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Ahh ... good times ... by poena.dare · · Score: 1

      While Sir Tim was busy inventing I was jazzed about GEnie, Compuserve, and AppleLink. I couldn't imagine things getting so much more sophisticated. Then 4 years later I used the "View Source" command for the first time. I immediately grokked what HTML was about. Biggest rush EVAR! I was also not wearing pants.

      Thanks, Sir Tim, for the long-lasting endorphin high and the savings on my laundry bills.

    2. Re:Ahh ... good times ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember going to gopher and WAIS quite a bit too.

    3. Re:Ahh ... good times ... by Viol8 · · Score: 0

      If you're old enough to have done all that then you're old enough not to use silly kid words like "grok" and "EVAR".

      From a 20 something its cool, from a 30 or 40 something its just plain sad.

    4. Re:Ahh ... good times ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of my professors, Eric Roberts, was on ARPANet back when the ARPANet still published directories: physical, paper binders with a name and description of every user.

      He still teaches the introductory CS class at Stanford. One quarter I was course-helping, and after our weekly meeting we'd been talking about the prehistoric internet. He opened Mac Mail and showed us some of us some of his email from 1973.

      Apparently the Mailbox Protocol was similar enough to its successor, SMTP, that some modern software can still read the headers.

       

    5. Re:Ahh ... good times ... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      But I also remember downloading stuff from the usenet alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.*....

      Hah I remember everybody denying they looked at porn.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    6. Re:Ahh ... good times ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you're old enough to have done all that then you're old enough not to use silly kid words like "grok" and "EVAR".

      From a 20 something its cool, from a 30 or 40 something its just plain sad.

      I'm betting that virtually everyone you have EVAR met in real life considers you an enormous asshole and doesn't return your calls.

    7. Re:Ahh ... good times ... by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I don't think "EVAR" is cool from anyone.

      About "grok", I totally disagree with you. Since it comes from a book first published in 1961, he's almost too *young* to say it. (But not really, since we all quote Shakespeare, and that's hundreds of years old.)

    8. Re:Ahh ... good times ... by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      But I also remember downloading stuff from the usenet alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.* newsgroups and needing to edit out the headers, cat them together, and then run the whole thing through uudecode. Good times -- that's partly how I learned vi. ;-)

      wait.... but then how did you learn emacs?

    9. Re:Ahh ... good times ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the mentally handicapped who think that LOLcats style "baby" talk is somehow cute and endearing coming from anybody over the age of 5.

    10. Re:Ahh ... good times ... by JustOK · · Score: 1

      LOL. interesting views. I can haz newsletter?

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    11. Re:Ahh ... good times ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. The good old days. It was an interesting time in the early days. I first got onto the Arpanet in the early 1980s. By the time the WWW came along, it's value was pretty self-evident and it was just a matter of how stupid outsiders (i.e. management) were going to be. "It's just college kids and academics using the internet. It's a complete waste to do a company web site!" LOL. Knowing better was quite a rush since you knew what Epic Fail these folks were and how badly they'd get their comeuppance soon enough.

      Kids today don't know how good they have it.

      Damn kids! Get off my lawn!! :-)

    12. Re:Ahh ... good times ... by conares · · Score: 1

      But I also remember downloading stuff from the usenet alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.* newsgroups and needing to edit out the headers, cat them together, and then run the whole thing through uudecode. Good times -- that's partly how I learned vi. ;-)

      Jeez, didn't your local 7-11 carry porn magazines?

      --
      That, that really grinds my gears!
    13. Re:Ahh ... good times ... by rainhill · · Score: 1

      and yet you have 6 digits /. uid ;-)

    14. Re:Ahh ... good times ... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Yep. I had to use emulated SLIP and PPP through TIA and SLiRP on dial-up modems since my college/university didn't have real PPP and SLIP. Also, only three dial-up connections. Of course, me hogged one of them most of the times. Hah!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  7. 1993 by cashman73 · · Score: 2

    My first experience with the World Wide Web was similar to subby -- it was in the Sun lab at the Department of Computer Science at Old Dominion University. The browser was NCSA Mosaic, and the workstations were about half black & white and half color. The rise of the Web started minor fights for the color monitors! Back in these days, the Web was pre-Google (or should I say, "BG", as opposed to "AG" ;-) . . . the home page was set to the local ODUCS website, and from there you could go to the NCSA Mosaic "What's New on the WWW" page and find interesting stuff. Plus, there was also the horny geeks on the 17th floor (p0rn), somewhere in Belgium,. . . ;-) Then, along came the Cool Site of the Day, featuring a new site every day of the week, which was fun. Back in those days, things were so new I never expected that I'd watch most TV shows via the Internet or access the WWW on my iPhone,. . .

    1. Re:1993 by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      I probably first saw the Web around 1993 or 1994. It was Mosaic on Windows 3.1 using Trumpet Winsock.

      I hosted my first Web server on the same platform, using ZBserver, in 1994. I had no administrative access to any *n*x boxes at the time, just Netware servers and VAXen, and I wasn't about to mess around with those, so I ran the web service on my desktop. I switched that to Windows 95 and the corresponding version of ZBserver fairly quickly, of course. I used to keep the log window open, so I could see when/if someone was hitting it.

      In addition to the obligatory "about myself" page, that server ran a small site dedicated to reviewing comic books and graphic novels; I'm pretty sure it was the first such site on the Web. I didn't have my own domain at the time, so I simply used the machine's public *.edu name... which got me fired over the fact that I was including fair-use images from the comics I was reviewing, which meant I was "publishing" naughty drawings with the college's name in the URL. Admittedly a foolish thing to do, but in my defense, I didn't have the cautionary exhibit of a million sexting teens and drunken facetards to learn from. And just try explaining it to potential employers who ask why you left your previous position. My first taste of unemployment. So yeah, the Web changed my life pretty "quickly and profoundly". :/

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:1993 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember using Mosaic at Old Dominion in 1993 as well but at the campus help desk where I worked part time as a student. The one thing I remember most was a website from Cambridge University that had a camera broadcasting a feed of their coffee pot. I think it updated the very grainy picture every few minutes. It seemed so cool at the time.

    3. Re:1993 by robsku · · Score: 1

      I think it was around 93 for me too to first use internet... Back then I did not own a computer, we had one shared by family but I used to hoard that 286 more than my father who used it for work, however it was not until -95 until we got our first modem so I tried to satisfy my interest with library computers - 286's with Windows 3.0 or 3.1 and Mosaic, a huge book with internet "directory list" and no understanding of how things worked and what was what... Neither did the people in library, they guided me to use mosaic and I was baffled with the book they gave me. I had no idea why none of the addresses seemed to work - I knew nothing about usenet, all I expected from internet was webpages, found some through links on the start page but the book was all usenet groups, not www pages :)

      Well, I've come a long way since that, and like with everything else I was fast learner then too... Still from 95 when we got our first modem to around 97-99, don't remember that clear, I did not use usenet, my thing was accessing FidoNet through local BBS, I kept accessing the BBS and FidoNet as long as until early 2000's though at that point I was writing in Usenet too but while I liked internet over BBS for most other things I always liked FidoNet over usenet, which I have no other explanation to that perhaps I just get attached to it because I got addicted to BBS's and FidoNet before internet :)

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
  8. The Wheel or Fire might be more profound. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...would change the world more quickly and profoundly than anything before or since."

    While certainly revolutionary (quite literally in recent times), I would argue that the advent of man-made fire or the wheel would give it a run for its money. Those have also been somewhat useful.

    1. Re:The Wheel or Fire might be more profound. by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2

      The wheel and fire are certainly damn important inventions, but looked at purely in terms of number of lives affected the web probably beats anything else, just because there were so few people back in the stone age, whereas there are now a billion or so people online. The web is a staggering success story, and the story of the internet as a whole has barely even begun.

    2. Re:The Wheel or Fire might be more profound. by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      The Wheel took longer than the Web to get around to everyone. Likewise, Fire didn't catch on as quickly.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    3. Re:The Wheel or Fire might be more profound. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientific method? Electrification? Quantum physics? Fossil fuels? Germ theory? Information technology is meaningless on an empty stomach at night.

    4. Re:The Wheel or Fire might be more profound. by yacwroy · · Score: 1

      Those billion people online are likely to make use of the wheel and fire a great deal. Even the fans and disk platters on their computers are wheels, and said computers are ultimately powered by wheels (which are quite likely to be powered by fire).

      And the vast majority of non-internet users use wheels and fire.

      --
      You agree with me.
  9. AOL by ItsPaPPy · · Score: 0

    Well someone has to post about it. For me it was AOL 2.5 on my 14.4 modem on windows 3.1. Screaming fast!

    1. Re:AOL by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      14.4 was like my 6th modem hehe come back with AOL on a 2400baud in DOS

    2. Re:AOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      get off my lawn, in my day we were giddy when our acoustic couplers and rickety newfangled modems got up to 300baud from 100-150baud.

    3. Re:AOL by rossdee · · Score: 1

      Lets see - 1200 2400 9600 14400

      I was just using local BBS then.
      Actually ran one myself 1992 to 2002

      On Amiga computers of course.

      But the most life changing event for me would be getting onto IRC in 2000

    4. Re:AOL by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Damn upstart kids with their "acoustic couplers" and 300 baud... We used to have to put out tongues on the telegraph wires and rebuild our porn from the shocks we got!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  10. Remember it like it was yesterday. by CrackedButter · · Score: 0

    I fondly remember going to my 6th form library in 1997 to visit totalannihilation.com on Bondi Blue iMacs to download new units onto a floppy disk every week. I was savvy enough to understand that the floppy disk needed to be formatted for FAT32 and the Mac could read them but Windows being the ignorant computer citizen it was, couldn't read Mac formatted disks.

    1. Re:Remember it like it was yesterday. by Osgeld · · Score: 2

      its not that windows was being ignorant, they just didn't want to pay the licensing fee for a damn near dead propitiatory format that even apple had dropped by then

    2. Re:Remember it like it was yesterday. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i guess you meant FAT12 ;)

    3. Re:Remember it like it was yesterday. by HisMother · · Score: 0

      MMMmmmm, no. Mac had (and used) variable-speed motors in their floppy drives. Wintel machines physically could not read Mac disks -- they were not compatible at the hardware level.

      --
      Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
    4. Re:Remember it like it was yesterday. by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      HFS was replaced in 1998 by HFS+, but was supported by Apple up until earlier this year when OS X Lion was released - you can no longer format or write to HFS volumes in Lion, they are read only.

      Not bad for a "damn near dead" proprietary format (that is part of Apple's open source offerings, along with HFS+)

      hfsutils (open source) has been available since 1996 or so enabling the totally free, licence-fee-free use of HFS formatted disks on non-Apple systems to this day.

      Don't let your Apple hate get in the way of facts or anything. You're looking for a "Apple are evil, that's why Windows didn't support HFS!" angle where it really doesn't exist.

    5. Re:Remember it like it was yesterday. by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      no I am looking at no one in 1998 owned a mac so no one cared angle, its one of the reasons I still own a 603e machine, simply so I can make mac floppy disk's and HFS+ was never used on floppy's which is what were talking about here

    6. Re:Remember it like it was yesterday. by Osgeld · · Score: 2

      they only used the variable speed motors on the 800k format, 1.44 meg "superdisks" dropped that and outside of software they work the same way as your pc drive via standard speed and mfm.

      Thanks for playing

    7. Re:Remember it like it was yesterday. by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      You're contradicting yourself - you are claiming that HFS was "near dead" and are now claiming "HFS+ was never used on floppies", unless you're saying "no one cared about floppies because they were near dead [in 1998]" but that's a different issue. You were specifically talking about HFS.

      Still, it remains accurate that you could use HFS formatted disks in non-Apple machines since 1996 due to the GPL licenced hfsutil. They certainly didn't have to pay any "licensing fee" to Apple for use of the format, which is what you claim prevented Microsoft from supporting the format in Windows.

      We return full circle: you're talking out of your ass with wild, factually incorrect guesses and speculation.

      Currently HFS and HFS+ are covered under Apple's open source licence, and the "near dead" HFS was supported fully (read, write, format) up until OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard and is now only legacy supported (read only) in OS X 10.7 Lion. Of course, hfsutil still works, and you're free to write your own HFS writing software.

    8. Re:Remember it like it was yesterday. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iMacs with floppy drives ?

      Hmmmmmmm........

    9. Re:Remember it like it was yesterday. by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      you can still write in in a dead language it doesn't make it any less dead and I dont understand your confusion HFS and HFS+ are two different things, by 1996 they were giving it away cause no one used it anymore except for apple macintosh floppies, hard disks were in HFS+, but by this time no one cares cause every fucking manufacture in the world accepted the same drive specs years before and they weren't apple's cutesy hack locked in propitiatory bullshit.

    10. Re:Remember it like it was yesterday. by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      My goodness, the hate is strong in this one. I think we need to simplify things to make it easier for you to understand through your frothing Apple hate.

      1) I am aware that HFS and HFS+ are different things, albeit related.

      2) Hard disks were not "in HFS+" in 1996 - it wasn't introduced until 1998 with OS 8.1.

      3) HFS and HFS+ are not "locked in bullshit" they are open, documented specifications released under an open source licence. You have never needed to pay fees or royalties to use it.

      4) As far as it being a "hack", it offered a few advantages compared to the alternatives around at the time (namely FAT), with some drawbacks also (several of these addressed by HFS+, some of them not).

      5) Let's repeat number 3 again because it's quite important; there's nothing "locked in" about HFS or HFS+ - anyone can write tools to read and write the format, as a bunch of Unix-y folks did back in the mid 90s because despite your assertions that "no one cared" about it, people obviously had enough interest to warrant a utility to use the format on non-Apple OSes, along with at least two competing commercial products that clearly made enough money to be profitable (despite the existence of an open source tool that did the same job).

      If you took off your "I hate Apple rarrr!" T shirt for long enough to maybe wash it occasionally, you might be able to have a debate using actual facts when you're not blinded by raw vitriol for a computer manufacturer.

    11. Re:Remember it like it was yesterday. by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      They external iomega floppy drives attached to them. This WAS 1997, people were still in denial over Apple pulling the floppy drive from their newest creations.

    12. Re:Remember it like it was yesterday. by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      That to me is ignorance, MS never wanted to pay licensing for just about everything, computer formats or Helvetica. Like I said, they were ignorant and making my life hard just for transferring a megabyte on a floppy from computer to computer.

    13. Re:Remember it like it was yesterday. by yuhong · · Score: 1
    14. Re:Remember it like it was yesterday. by yuhong · · Score: 1

      The iMac existed in 1997?

  11. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  12. All I have to say is, thank you. by WebManWalking · · Score: 2

    The World Wide Web has been very, very good to me. Thank you, TBL.

    1. Re:All I have to say is, thank you. by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

      I second that. He is one of the guys that make nobiliary titles appear as something good. I remember Mosaic and Netscape running in SPARC stations and SGI Indigo machines at my city university's top computer lab in late 1994-mid 1995.

      Thank you Sir Tim Berners-Lee.

      --
      Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
  13. In the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the mid 90s I visited SF for a holiday and bought a computer magazine, called www or something. When I got back I got hold of slip and lynx, shortly followed by Mosaic. Mosaic was a revelation and I immediately realised what this 'information superhighway' idea we were selling to our consultancy clients was going to be based on. Also, echo the above comments about usenet, alt.binaries.etc and uuencode. I also first came across some of the more distinctive Japanese cultural artefacts.

  14. Re:Today ,let's take stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't tug on Superman's cape
    You don't spit into the wind
    You don't pull the mask off the old Lone Ranger...

    I think you can infer the rest.

  15. Ahh yes... by seanvaandering · · Score: 1

    Don't we all remember banging away on our 300 baud modem thinking it was FAST.... Oh the memories.

    1. Re:Ahh yes... by wsxyz · · Score: 1

      I don't remember thinking 300 baud was fast, but it worked. It was great for reading long textfiles as the characters appeared on the screen just about as fast as I could read them. Getting the 1200 baud modem, though, changed everything. Suddenly you could download software without tying up the phone line for half the day.

    2. Re:Ahh yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Don't we all remember banging away on our 300 baud modem thinking it was FAST

      No, I remember having a 300 baud modem and thinking it was very slow. You can read faster than 300 baud. I had 300 baud for maybe a year before getting a 1200 baud modem. This was around 1985 or so.

      1200 baud was a huge improvement. It still took forever to download a game though. 9600 baud was the first modem I actually thought was "fast".

    3. Re:Ahh yes... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Unless you were used to using a 110baud acoustically coupled modem, 300 was still slow. And you could still whistle into the phone and make it print characters on the screen. 1200baud - now that was cool, and 2400 was just ludicrous (when they worked, which was suspect at times), as well as being beyond the budget of those of us still in school.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:Ahh yes... by dotwhynot · · Score: 1

      Don't we all remember banging away on our 300 baud modem thinking it was FAST No, I remember having a 300 baud modem and thinking it was very slow. You can read faster than 300 baud. I had 300 baud for maybe a year before getting a 1200 baud modem. This was around 1985 or so.

      1200 baud was a huge improvement. It still took forever to download a game though. 9600 baud was the first modem I actually thought was "fast".

      Just a small nitpick in case you are interested: Baud symbol rate != bitrate. The V.32 9.600 kbit/s modems were 2400 baud. The V.34 33.6 kbit/s modems were 3,429 baud.

    5. Re:Ahh yes... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Don't we all remember banging away on our 300 baud modem thinking it was FAST....

      Oh the memories.

      Bah! You kids! I remember my first real job. Our group's terminal had a 300 baud connection to the main computer in the same building. Ah, yes, basking in the sickly orange glow of the terminal - 1981 was good times...

      I was the kid in the group, and the only one with computing skills. Seriously, sometimes if you typed fast enough you could stop and watch the letters on the screen appear after the fact.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  16. Required Simpsons Reference by Scholasticus · · Score: 1

    Yes, I know this was some years later ... Comic Book Guy: "Oh, Captain Janeway. Lace: The Final Brassiere.Oh hurry up, I'm a busy man. Ugh, this high-speed modem is intolerably slow."

  17. "It's like Gopher, but better" by EnglishTim · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think it must have been 1993; possibly 1994 - I was shown Mosaic by another student. I remember thinking it was like some kind of mix between Hypercard and gopher. I can't remember what the first site I visited was. I do remember that all web pages were grey and left-justified, though.

    1. Re:"It's like Gopher, but better" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in 1992 or so I knew a guy who had a 128kbps ISDN connection at his house. He was kind enough to run a server (with 386BSD, I believe) connected to a small bank of 2400 baud modems. I remember dialing up his server with Telix or Telemate and using Gopher, FTP, mail and Lynx to read stuff and download little utilities.

      I also called a lot of local BBSes and even ran my own for a few years. Staying up late nights working on ANSI graphics for the BBS (I think it was WWIV, but might have even been on Vision/2 by then) was lots of fun.

      It was a time of wonder.

    2. Re:"It's like Gopher, but better" by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      I do remember that all web pages were grey and left-justified, though.

      They still are.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  18. FAST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like how fast his page loads. Must have done a lot of optimisation.

    1. Re:FAST by kvvbassboy · · Score: 2
      The best website is the one that delivers content without requiring optimization. ;)

      Also, the html source for the first www page is just 78 lines. :D

  19. Happy Birthday by Haedrian · · Score: 1

    I'm not nearly as tech-old as you people, but I still remember the days before Google where someone would give you their h.t.t.p.colon.slash.slash website which you'd view on Netscape.

    1. Re:Happy Birthday by kvvbassboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      What? What about ask.com, altavista.com and yahoo.com? In fact, altavista as a search engine was the "google" of yesterday.

    2. Re:Happy Birthday by Haedrian · · Score: 1

      I remember altavista, but I didn't use search engines that much in those days. Its not like the 'search browsing' of today.

    3. Re:Happy Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember before Google... Altavista was king... it was hard to find anything. People have forgotten how bad early search engines were.

    4. Re:Happy Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You youngsters and your web-page based search engines!
      Webferret, now that was a search program. 25MB of locally cached keywords.

      Edit: HOLY CRAP- They're still making it!?!
      http://www.webferret.com/

    5. Re:Happy Birthday by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I don't know where i would be without it.

      Given that my official job title contains the word "Web"... I'm not sure where I'd be either!

      Fighting crime, maybe?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    6. Re:Happy Birthday by crankyspice · · Score: 1

      In fact, altavista as a search engine was the "google" of yesterday.

      Altavista's raging.com was the google of yesterday. Raging stripped out all the 'OMG we're not just a search engine we're a Portal!!' cruft that had accumulated on the major search engines and got back to search basics, circa 1999 or so.

      --
      geek. lawyer.
    7. Re:Happy Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember lycos?

    8. Re:Happy Birthday by soundguy · · Score: 1

      I remember before Google... Altavista was king... it was hard to find anything. People have forgotten how bad early search engines were.

      I remember Altavista, Magellan, etc sucking a lot. HotBot was the king of the pre-google internet.

      --
      Nothing worthwhile ever happens before noon
    9. Re:Happy Birthday by scottrocket · · Score: 1
      "People have forgotten how bad early search engines were."

      That's why I tended to use dogpile. Apparently, it's still going strong, though I haven't used it in 10years.

    10. Re:Happy Birthday by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      And before that, you could buy internet yellow pages, as in actual hardcopy books that would come to you in the mail. It looked like an AT&T yellow pages, if you can find one of them around. And you could look up addresses and find where you wanted to go.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    11. Re:Happy Birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember the URL to AltaVista as altavista.digital.com

  20. 1993 NCSA Mosaic by Rick+Richardson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "If you haven't tried NCSA Mosaic to travel the Internet, then you are
    missing the best way to experience the Internet...Its so good, I think
    we should make a WWW server [here], and get a [256kbps] connection to
    the Internet."  -- Rick Richardson, 9 Aug 1993

    1. Re:1993 NCSA Mosaic by Haedrian · · Score: 2

      256 kbps? You people are crazy. The bits will get confused if you try to move them at that speed. In fact, having cables like that near farmland will make chickens stop laying.

  21. 1994 first for me by Grand+Facade · · Score: 1

    Dialing into message boards and private networks that had internet access.

    I tried AOL im sure but that could not have lasted more than a month or so.

    Then I found Best and found a home.

    --
    Rick B.
  22. I told colleagues this would change everything by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    In 93, when www first "arrived" with Mosaic, but one technical leader said: Yeah but we already have the "gopher" protocol. Why do we need this?

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:I told colleagues this would change everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually remember telling my coleague Sprint will ultimately kill internet, given it was twice as fast for copying files. Once more worse standard prevailed :-)

    2. Re:I told colleagues this would change everything by yuhong · · Score: 1

      Then the Gopher licensing fiasco came about and...

  23. "It's like Gopher, but without real content" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Years before http: there was gopher:. And gopher could "hyperlink" to other gopher sites, depending on the client you were using. HTML was really the innovation, not the world wide web. As I recall, the web was, for many years, just a novelty compared to the real content in FTP and Gopher.

  24. It was cool, but didn't do much by brwski · · Score: 1

    I had a college classmate who had just returned from an internship in Switzerland: "Let me show you something I helped work on this summer..." We had been using Gopher, of course, and individual command-line networking tools (even on our NeXTStations), but this was something...different. When I mentioned that it was cool, but didn't offer much content, my classmate was quick to answer: "but think of what we can use it for!" I wasn't there for the birth, but I did see it smile for the first time...

    --

    brwski
    "Because without beer, things do not seem to go as well''

  25. Happy Birthday by cyberzephyr · · Score: 1

    I don't know where i would be without it.

    --
    I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
  26. Why the confusion by johnw · · Score: 1

    Microsoft must take a lot of the blame for the confusion in the public mind between "The Internet" and "The World Wide Web". By calling their web browser "Internet Explorer" they misled a lot of people right from the start. Yes, you can use it to access stuff other than web sites, but for most beginners, the fact that the tool was called Internet Explorer meant it was obvious that "The Internet" was the thing they were browsing.

  27. 1991 by Scareduck · · Score: 1

    I was a fresh-outta-college CS major working at the then-aerospace behemoth Hughes Aircraft Company. We had been connected to Usenet mail and newsgroups using the very highfalutin' and expensive Telebit Trailblazer modem, one of the first 9600 BPS modems to hit the market.

    The first evidence I can find of my former self is at the Telecom Digest archives, on a thread about phone repair service in the September 9, 1991 digest. I'm quite certain I was active on that list prior to our office's conversion to Internet mail, but it was a very big deal at the time.

    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

  28. Re:You Never Forget Your First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    best XKCD ever!

  29. The world is still at war over ancient bullshit by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    Please, do tell, what exactly has changed?

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  30. Yahoo by gatzke · · Score: 1

    I remember a buddy showing me "this cool yahoo thing" on Mosaic my senior year at GT. I think it was hosted out of a home directory rather than a proper URL.

    Before that, we were lucky to have "fast" 9600 baud modems in the dorms. Get off of my lawn!

  31. dating myself ... by filo_doe · · Score: 2

    The news spread pretty quickly at my university in Chicago, where I was working in 91. Having used archie and gopher we immediately recognized the potential. Yeah, Cern's www line mode browser with its numbered link interface wasn't much. We knew that would change. What mattered was the protocol. For me UK's lynx provided the first fast curses interface. We started gathering and providing lots of academic info really quickly. Watching think tank and academic info growth explode exponentially was a great experience. Some early bookmarks: lanl, ncsa, ukansas, uminn, simtel, ibiblio. What struck me as goofy after 91 -- and this persisted for a few years even after Mosaic was released -- were the web sites that tried to replicate the feel of a gopher interface.

  32. first usage by bwhalen · · Score: 1

    It was late 1992 or early 1993 at SJSU. I got a UNIX acct and tried gopher, veronica, and lynx for hours that first evening, a total quarter to three evening.

    --
    Where do you want to be, What are you doing to get there.
  33. Around 1993-94, at the Penn State Library... by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    ... I saw the web for the first time at a public computer while researching our garden simulator. I was not impressed. Back then I had used Hypercard and Smalltalk, and it just seemed like we could do a whole lot better, and I had been thinkign about how to do that. I still feel that way a bit, alhough obviously the linking idea has worked well, HTML and http had broad powers in their simplicity, even with links not being first class objects and virtual machines not being standardized, and so on. So, first impressions can be misleading, although I still feel there are major missing pieces or standards. We need to push on to a social semantic desktop, IMHO, and I've tried some in that direction myself...
    http://semanticweb.org/wiki/Semantic_Desktop
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/pointrel/

    By the way, a little known fact -- the 1950s short story "The Skills of Xanadu" by Theodore Sturgeon, about a culturally sophisticated networked culture that "defeats" a huge military empire that comes to conquer it, inspired Ted Nelson to work on hypertext (I asked Ted Nelson about this directly when he gave a talk at at IBM Research, and he had forgotten the name of the story, but that's where the name came from), and then his work obviously was one of the inspirations of the web. The story is floating around on the web, like in Google Books:
        http://www.google.com/#q=the+skills+of+xanadu

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  34. Godzilla Spider by epine · · Score: 1

    I can definitely recall running NCSA Mosaic 2.0, but I'm a bit dim whether I cut my teeth on an earlier Mosaic. A year or two before this, I had managed to obtain internet access when I lived in Toronto in the first week available on a provider called io.org where I mostly used the shell account on a system called r-node. Wikipedia says Internex Online was the first consumer dial-up ISP in Canada. Lots of people I knew had access to the internet through university dial-up accounts, back when September came once a year.

    r-node was hardly what you would call a reliable service. I learned basic shell survival skills and made heavy use of an archie server based at University of McGill and downloaded a lot of technical information over ftp, if my session would stay up long enough to succeed. I tried gopher, but decided it was a bit of a crock.

    I was in Halifax the year Mosaic came out, dialing in through Chebucto Freenet. This was a great community service. Cheap and surprisingly reliable for the price. Lynx was the default browser and I was happy enough with this since I was mostly using a 486 laptop with a monochrome screen.

    On the Mosaic internet, I remember grey screens with rainbow separator bars populated with animated men-at-work GIFs and link-farm homesteads as far as the eye could see. This appalling landscape was so obviously the future it was almost beneath comment. I vaguely recall that you could find content at universities, wired.com, and gaming companies (ID Software must have been a frequent destination). My technical interest at this time was finding a way to compile the HP Standard Template Library with the Watcom C/C++ compiler.

    So far I'm treating Mosaic as gopher clubbed onto the ice floe with a giant clue stick. I recall reading the URL specification in detail, which far more than HTML seemed to be the magic sauce. Mosaic dazzled in potential more than it impressed on first unveiling.

    The first time I regarded document mark-up in a different light was when Sun started to promote the Java language. I read about the stack coherency guarantee, which impressed me, then I read about floating point ... and I flipped the bozo-bit so hard it almost gave me a concussion. The idea that floating point math was required to give the same answer on every underlying implementation offended me to the darkest nub of Scientology-hatred. Later it played out that strict adherence on x86 reduced floating point performance by an order of magnitude, because the implementation had to suppress "double rounding" involving the floating point guard bits (64 bit mantissa for working results). Sun thought that arrogating an order-of-magnitude reduction in floating point performance on x86 was doing the world a favour. Their world, not mine.

    In high school, my idea of excitement was to program my calculator during chemistry class, leaving just enough of my brain active to grasp the general principle, then to use the midterm to apply my gleanings to a problem set for the first time. I spent my homework hours devising algorithms or formulas for anything that caught my fancy, with scant connection to school work. There was a lot of muttering about "heuristics" in chemistry class, which was a red flag for me to tune out completely. It always turned out that there was a precise answer available if you had a bit more foundation in math.

    To my shock and horror on one chemistry mid-term, I discovered that the equilibrium condition for solution concentration expands to a cubic polynomial. This didn't trouble me as such, but I knew that no-one else in the class scribbling beside me was solving cubic equations. Maybe I had my workings wrong. I reviewed this three times. No, my workings are absolutely solid: it's a cubic equation ten ways from zero. Well, I've got 25 minutes left in a 45 minute exam, I better solve me some cubics.

    In turns out the heuristic I missed involved approximating the cubic with a quadratic at the loss of about 10%

  35. Ridiculous hyperbole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "would change the world more quickly and profoundly than anything before or since"

    Such hyperbole is laughable.
    I suspect that the collision that created earth's moon had greater impact.

  36. It's neat, but I can get more from Gopher. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    That was my comment on seeing a secretary at Goddard Space Flight Center had one of the first versions of Mosaic (Summer 93?). I was already good at finding stuff with gopher and archie; I didn't need yet another interface.

    I will say, though, that by the spring of '94, I had changed my tune, and I told my wife that "in the future" you would see trucks and billboards with web addresses instead of 1-800 numbers. It is very possibly my only prescient statement regarding mass marketing, and I failed to act on it financially. So, I'm stuck with saying "I knew it would happen," having a witness who has, if anything, a reverse bias to telling people I'm right instead of being a rich dot.com'er/cybersquatter.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:It's neat, but I can get more from Gopher. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I have a few of those: Drive through windows on coffee shops, universal remote controls built into phaser and tricorder housings, a button on your TV that makes your remote beep.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  37. Challenger, Mosaic, 9/11 by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    I remember it like I remember the other two events. It's odd, as I was pretty dismissive of it, but it was in the front office of Bldg 5 at GSFC, and a secretary was showing it to me (yes, at NASA, back then, even the secretaries were geek-cool).

    All these threads bring back memories of that time (Trumpet Winsock, Gopher, etc...) which was just after I got out of college. Cool stuff, indeed.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  38. Re:floating point by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    Because I agree it would be so much better if the scientific calculation program I give you computes different results for you than it does for me.
    Definitely better.
    So much better than having to fix some broken implementations of a standard in the next rev.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  39. Tim Berners-Lee's first web page by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Oh, yeah - I remember hearing him complain about the lousy click-through rate on his Google ads...

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  40. 9.600 kbit/s should of course be 9.6 kbit/s by dotwhynot · · Score: 2

    Slashdot needs post editing

  41. Bah, Whippersnappers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ' Got a few words fer ye : 150 Baud modems, analog telephone lines, BBSs (with overnight email with "internet addresses"), AOL an "dem other guys" vs. the rest of the world (the rest of the world won), finger, archie, ftp, textmail, ascii-art, asc-ii star-trek "simulator", (borrowed) ibm accounts at the U. And manuals. Wonderful ... manuals (including D&D).

    I'm waiting for more interplanetary internet. Eight or 32 minute ping delays. Overnight email. Just like de *good* old days. :)

  42. Memories of Predictions Past by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 1

    I didn't discover the web until 94 but I have fond memories of going to yahoo and skiimming through all the new websites on the Internet each week.

    When I look back at my predictions from those early years, I was right about predicting the emergence of services like ebay, wikipedia, online newspapers and how the web would eventually supplant tv as the number one medium for wasting time.

    I imaged social networking would be a bit like slashdot but that everyone would have their own personal webservers and that discussions would unfold as flat files. I imagined there would be tools that aggregated all the homepage discussions of your friends into threads of a single feed of "what's new and hot" and that you wouldn't care so much about modding comments up or down because it was all happening within smaller communities and if you didn't like a thread, you'd just drop it from your feed.

    I was mostly wrong about universities (I thought that they would eventually become completely redundant with the web but they actually seem to be enduring more intact and unchanged than any other part of society). I was also worried that the decline of mass media in favour of user-to-user communication and hiveminds would mean an explosion of new relgions and religious-type thinking, but even though hiveminds are a problem on the web, they aren't as much of a problem as I had expected.

    I also expected that there would be a lot more sentimental/poetic websites - I imagined a web of maps of the world would emerge, marked up with layers of memories, comments about why people found certain locations, virtual graffiti or game-like systems using real maps. Sort of a google maps / geocaching mix

  43. Wasn't impressed, either. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was working at Motorola in the early 90's and we'd just completed evaluations and selection of the end-user development environment for our new data warehouse project. I really like a Mac-thing called Prograph (we were an all-Mac facility) but we settled on PowerBuilder which, even then, I knew was on its last legs. It was a the safe choice, which usually is not really a good choice. Lesson learned.

    A friend who worked in another department grabbed me and showed me a web page he'd written that queried a SQL database halfway across the country and displayed the results in Mosaic on a Mac.

    "Uh, yeah," I said, not really getting it. I, too, had played with HyperCard and this web-wide-web was still pretty rough. I was wrong but the upside was just too much for a sane person to believe so I forgive me.

    1. Re:Wasn't impressed, either. by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

      "the upside was just too much for a sane person to believe so I forgive me."

      Good point. :-)

      The same may be true right now about things like 3D printing (recent slashdot article on printing an airplane) or PV solar power (which GE predicts may be cheaper than fossil fuels by around 2015).

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  44. WordWideWeb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to fire up my old NeXT workstation and see if I can find anything that still displays reasonably coherently in WorldWideWeb.app.

  45. pr0gress by codeAlDente · · Score: 1

    Around 1995 I logged on to AOL through a computer at my mom's office. There was a chat room and people were asking what the Internet was, and how you could access it. Eventually I learned, then there was college and pr0n, and now I buy stuff from Amazon without tax. Even in California. Also, no more trips to the library, and no more wondering how to make byesar. Thank you Sir Tim.

    --
    He once inserted random mutations into his code, just so he could have the experience of debugging.
    1. Re:pr0gress by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      You are legally required to pay use tax, equivalent to sales tax, for purchases that do not automatically collect sales tax.

    2. Re:pr0gress by codeAlDente · · Score: 1

      I am not a "qualified purchaser", you insensitive clod.

      --
      He once inserted random mutations into his code, just so he could have the experience of debugging.
    3. Re:pr0gress by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      You don't have to be a jerk. I googled that, it seems irrelevant.

      What I am referring to is, e.g. line 95 of the CA form 540. "Use tax".

    4. Re:pr0gress by codeAlDente · · Score: 1

      Well clearly you're correct, but the use tax is nothing new, and it only became fashionable to enforce after the Internet made it practical (not that mail order catalogs are entirely impractical) for larger numbers of people to order a greater diversity of products from vendors located in other states. The notion of a qualified purchaser, and the current efforts to force the local tax-collecting burden onto Amazon, was intended to force compliance with this law when there is no other way to force compliance. It's not a good law. It's ambiguous, unenforceable, and its asymmetric regulatory and monetary burdens violate my basic ideals of equity and justice. Same with porn. When I was a kid, we didn't have no Internet, and my only source of porn was an old stack of magazines buried under a rock on a trash-lined portion of street that us kids called Dead Man's Curve. Nobody knew who left them there, but we all appreciated it. Sure, somebody probably broke the law. Same thing now, but plenty of kids get to illegally look at much better porn now thanks to the Internet. Also, mattack2, sorry to be a jerk - it wasn't my intent, and my sarcasm doesn't translate well online. Usually it doesn't translate well to real conversation either, but hey, I'm a nerd. I'd never use the phrase insensitive clod for the purposes of serious criticism.

      --
      He once inserted random mutations into his code, just so he could have the experience of debugging.
  46. Lynx text browser on a VMS box in 1993 by DeafDumbBlind · · Score: 1

    Freshman year in college. Our dorm rooms were wired with 10Mb ethernet and pathworks.
    We had accounts on a couple of VMS boxes that were exposed to internet using a couple of T1 lines.
    Don't remember the first graphical browser I used.

    --


    Jesus used to be my co-pilot, but we crashed in the mountains and I had to eat him.
  47. Primenet 1993 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a Primenet account in Phoenix, AZ in 1993... I remember having to figure out winsock and trumpet and god only knows what else to get it to work... After running a BBS for a decade (my first modem was 300 baud in 1983) my original opinion of the web/internet was simply "meh". Now that everyone and their Mom is surfing, downloading, emailing, tweeting, etc. I've revised my opinion to "mostly meh."

  48. Happy Birthday and First Memories by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    First of all... Happy birthday, World Wide Web! (and no, it is neither a Rickroll nor a goatse.)

    Now, my first memories of the Web was shortly after Prairienet in the Champaign-Urbana area went public through the library. That would be either 1993 or 1994. I first had to go to the library to connect because my computer at the time (Apple IIGS) had both a malfunctioning keyboard and monitor. Eventually it got fixed and I could then explore the deep dark depths of the Internet from the comfort of home. I checked out this app that Prairienet had called Lynx to browse the Web, but it felt too klunky for general information and file searches. Instead, I decided I preferred using Gopher with the Archie or Veronica search tools. So I didn't do much on the Web until a couple years later when I got my first DOS/WfW system.

    My biggest use of the net at the time was MUDs, MUCKs, various USENet newsgroups, sponging smut off ftp sites, IRC, and email via PINE.

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  49. 1993, 8th grade by markass530 · · Score: 1

    A group of us interested in computers went to the District office or whatever, where they had some computers connected to the web. (Mosaic was the browser of course) I didn't understand much at the time (didn't have a computer yet) but I asked a friend why the pages loaded slow (it was a 384k connection) My friend, used to 14.4 Dial up said "dude, you have no idea how fast this is". The next year when I finally got a computer, I realized how nice that 384k was. It would be 8 years before I used a connection that fast again.

  50. 1993.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We were doing a UNIX course at Liverpool University and during the module on using Gopher, Veronica and FTP to enhance our use of the internet, we were shown Mosaic running on one of the comp-labs higher-specced HP workstations (much faster than the ones we students played on). I don't recall which page we accessed, probably the Mosaic home page...... I do remember it was dog-slow.

    Of more interest at that time was the MCC Linux distro that was running through the comp-sci department like wildfire. 5 boxes of HD floppies....
     

  51. Time flies by The+Bastard · · Score: 1

    1991...Twenty years ago, and it seems like only yesterday.

    Anyway, my first experience with the "web" came around March/April '93 when I fired up NCSA Mosaic .8 or .9 at my alma mater. I'd graduated a couple of years prior, was working for a company in the area, and decided to head back to turn a minor into a major.

    That last point is important. You young pups may not realize it--with ubiquitous Internet access from almost any device, and the emphasis on developing and monetizing websites/apps--but back in those days, commercial activity on the Internet was a big "no-no", and in some cases illegal. Unless one was affiliated with an institution of higher learning, a scientific/reseach company, or a defense contractor, one wasn't getting on.

    So, there were no broadband or ISP dial-up connections, and high-speed generally meant 56-256Kb/s. Heck, a lot of backbones were T-1s (or multiple bonded T-1's by '93).

    So, after playing with Mosaic for a few days, the college network manager (who had been a year ahead of me) saw me messing around with it, and asked me what I thought. My reply: "Not bad. I really like the concept, and think it's going to work great for text. But these graphics...they're going to kill the backbone; it's unfeasible."

    Strangely enough (or not), that race is still ongoing today.

  52. 1992 book: "The Whole Internet" - 376 pages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got the May 1993 update. Barely fifty pages covers the actual Catalog section, and it was actually pretty damn comprehensive. Fifteen pages covers the new chapter on the new WWW.

    Written by Ed Krol, for O'Reilly, just before O'Reilly standardized on the Zoo; this one has a woodblock of a cartographer.

    And I was running Lynx on an Amiga. Forget the baud, but it was a step up from the 110/300 on the Apple ][. (A Hayes card? Think so.)

    Y'know what's really changed? During the first decade we had a term, "Web Years", because every year so damn much happened that the growth was convulsive. Each year easily felt like four or five or more till around 2000.

    Oh! And *Thank You* Tim. Most sincerely.

  53. My internet growth experience by CityZen · · Score: 1

    [Start with a 80x24 text-only 1200-baud CRT terminal.]
    1. Got an account at the university: was able to email other folks at the same university.
    2. Heard about Bitnet: you could email people at some different universities!
    3. Heard about Internet: you could email people at many different universities!
    [Upgrade to a 9600-baud CRT text terminal.]
    4. Heard about FTP: you could get files from people at other universities.
    5. Heard about newsgroups: you could socialize or ask questions with folks at universities.
    6. Oh, btw, you can send email to those people on Compuserve, AOL, etc.
    [upgrade to X11-based monochrome Sun workstation!]
    7. Heard about Archie, a way to search FTP sites.
    8. Heard about Gopher, a hyper-text program that runs across the Internet.
    9. Oh, btw, there are a few big companies on the Internet now.
    10. Now there's Veronica, a way to search Gopher sites.
    11. Somebody wanted to unify FTP, Archie, Gopher, and such; they're calling it WWW.
    [Oh, this WWW thing can show you images as well, so you'll want to use one of the rare, 8-bit color workstations.]
    [All images are 8-bit only, though, since that's all the workstations support (except for those very rare 24-bit workstations).]
    12. This WWW thing can be pretty cool now that more computer companies are on it.
    13. Some people at computer conferences are starting to mention URLs.
    14. Heard about AltaVista: a way to search the Internet.
    15. Some non-computer companies are starting to get on the web.
    [I can get a PC with a 24-bit VGA card & 13" color CRT.]
    16. Yahoo search seems to work better than AltaVista.
    17. Wow, the first mention of a URL outside of a computer-related context.
    18. Google search seems to work better than Yahoo.
    19. I can imagine a day where everyone will know about the WWW.
    20. Wow, that day is here. How'd I get so old so fast?
    [I can hook up an internet-browsing cell phone to display video on a 50" deep-color HDTV.]

  54. In the late 1980s... by SwedishChef · · Score: 1

    The Puget Sound area amateur radio operators had a tcp/ip network using the 2-meter ham bands and I put my Zeneth Z-100 laptop on it. I remember camping on San Juan Island with a ham group in 1989 and demonstrating how I could telnet from our campground into the Z-100 using a little Radio Shack hand-held computer. I couldn't do much of anything useful but it was very impressive.

    In about 1993 we had moved to a farm in central WA state and Internet access was available but was long distance until a Wenatchee ISP put in a set of modems at the community college in Moses Lake. These were 35 miles away but, more importantly, due to a recent change in long-distance charges made by Qwest it was a local call. I got a shell account at the Wenatchee ISP and could then use Lynx to surf the web. It was pretty cool.

    At about the same time I found a utility (I can't recall the name) that let me use my shell account to get a true PPP connection from my home Windoes 3.11 desktop. I had to be careful though because the utility allegedly used up enough resources at the other end that the system admin would notice. I renamed the utility and got a copy of Mosaic for my Windoes 3.11 box and then ran the utility and connected up. I can still recall that my first web page was about Egyptology featuring the treasures from King Tutankhamen's tomb. It was astonishingly better than Lynx. LOL

    About a week later my shell account was cancelled by the admins in Wenatchee. They had noticed that I was using more resources than usual and detected my ruse. It was about then that I bought into a partnership in Moses Lake that started up an ISP called atnet.net and since I was the main system admin no one could tell me what I could - or could not - do.

    Good times. And it was also nice - as a Unix guy - to disprove Byte Magazine's cover story claiming that Unix was dead. I went on to own two more ISPs and they all used either Unix or Linux. And instead Byte Magazine became dead.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  55. Same computer Bill Gates used by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    I was taught BASIC in graduate school in the mid seventies where we used the CDC used by Bill Gates as a teenager. It used punched cards and the "programmers" (who were just clerks) wore white lab coats as they took our cards from us. A day or so later we got our green bar paper back along with our card decks. People drew crazy designs on the end of the decks so they could find them more easily. It took three or four pages of green bar to provide the answer, which was normally something as complex as: 42. Several years later I managed to score an Apple ][ Minus (Integer BASIC) in '79 (?) and traded my $500 motorcycle for a second disk drive. I also threw in a CP/M card and taught myself dBase II. I wrote a program called "Readability" which measured the grade level of text material. It was sold by Micro Power & Light for about ten years and furnished me enough royalties to buy--more computers, mostly, without dipping into the family budget. Meanwhile I managed to get my work to authorize a PC, another Apple just like I had at home. It ran Visicalc, and a strange word processor called Zardax from Australia.

    I bought an IBM PC as soon as they came out (LOVED the keyboard!), and translated Readability for the IBM and did an Accounts Payable program out of dBase III compiled with Quicksilver. FidoNet was fairly new so I managed to get online that way at first, though I was also on "The Source" which charged per minute at the time. All that was pre-Web, of course. We put up a web server on Linux (which fit on two floppies at the time) in the very early nineties and put up a gopher, Pine for email, and Lynx as a web browser. I remember Mosaic, but we also had some other early graphic browsers I simply don't remember. Things started moving pretty fast after that. We automated with a mini, then re-automated with an ethernet system. I would install a LAN, then go to Novell school the next month to see how to do it. One of my guys had a young kid, so we'd tie an ethernet cable to his foot and have him slither through the crawlspace. We promised him a Happy Meal if he got to the other side. You never really know an industrial building unless you've wired it. We put in the first Frame Relay system in the city and managed to snag eleven Class C networks of our very own. (It would not happen today.) Each branch had its own Class C even though it had five devices only. (Now they may be up to 30 or so if you count the copy machines.)

    By the end I had about 500 machines, including about 50 servers on a very busy ten site WAN with fiber to the net. I thoroughly enjoyed my career, where it started and where I wound up even though I blundered through quite a bit of it. But I'm very grateful to be retired and not responsible for a network like that any longer.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  56. Still stuck on the 10th anniversery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With Still 9.8% of users on IE6, the web will not be considered mature but rather an adult baby who needs to still take off his nappies and learn to walk properly. When everybody is using fully HTML5 compliant browsers (Chrome still is 120 points behind on the HTML5 test). then I will consider the web to have a proper anniversary.

  57. 113 comments and NOT ONE has thanked Al Gore... by scottbomb · · Score: 1

    ... for inventing the internet. Shame on you all!

    1. Re:113 comments and NOT ONE has thanked Al Gore... by 427_ci_505 · · Score: 1

      This article is about the web, not the internet.

  58. 286 and lynx by m0nkyman · · Score: 1

    I first got on the Internet using an old 286 with a 2400 baud modem, using the freenet in Ottawa. For bonus geek points, at the time I was the head doorman at a bar called Zaphod Beeblebrox.

    --
    ~ a low user id is no indication I have a clue what I'm talking about.
  59. Old days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was 10 or so. Finding all the bbs's i could connect to. Using mad amounts of long distance, much to my mothers chagrin. On an IBM ps/2 with 30 meg of hard drive space.

  60. Only have 12 years of internet experience. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I am a younger whipper snapper who only got internet access in 1999. Grew up using IE5/ Windows 98 on a Pentium III 450 and quickly learned why Netscape failed including not letting me use as much CSS as IE on my fansites for Petz/Pokemon. Tried Opera back when it had ads, tried Mozilla when it was still Mozilla and not Firefox or even Phoenix. Got broadband via cable modem in 2002 and briefly became a Linux zealot until I got bored and went back to XP and know why Linux only has 0.5% market share. Bought Vista ultimate on the day it come out too so no more "free" software for me.

    Hopefully by 2015 when XP is end of support hence no more IE6 and Chrome/Firefox have finished playing version number games we can have a good web browsing experience with full HTML5 and the web will be considered a mature technology just like last century matured cars by the 1920s.

  61. Gopher was better by evilviper · · Score: 1

    We think of the WWW as being an OK thing these days, only because of years of hard-fought experience. Think of Geocities pages with wild-ass layouts. But back in the early days, imagine your bank, e-commerce sites, university sites, government sites, search engines, etc., all looked like they were put together by a child, and looked like Geocities.

    HTML has no standard layout. It's completely random. Whatever the hell you want to do. Whatever technologies you want to throw in. It took two decades for everyone to figure out that a navigation column (NOT A FRAME, NOT A SITEMAP, NOT AN IMAGE MAP), and with minimal changes as you navigate, is universally the way to go. So many times it was a nightmare trying to navigate a site, and you may NEVER be able to figure out how to get back to where you were, because the navigation column keeps changing the available options with each click. It was insane, and really, still isn't great.

    Still today, you have to LEARN every new website you visit, like a child. Is the nav bar something you have to click on, or will it pop-up more options when you hover over it? Are these top-level categories that will just take you to more navigation pages, or will they take you to a page on the subject with high-level information, or such?

    And how many years have we been hearing about the semantic web, and more and more markup to fill-in the gaps? I've got news for you... Gopher was great. It was strict about the format and layout of the page. Each page like navigating a book, but more importantly, every page worked exactly the same way. Imagine if the entire internet looked like a nice clean Wikipedia page... Mostly body text, links which take you to a list of references at the bottom, etc. No random layout crap. No advanced parsing to figure it all out. No need to learn to navigate anew with each new site you visit.

    Hell, look no further than slashdot. With each revision I just keep changing settings to give me as old an simple of a layout as I can get. Nested comments, threshold 3, no-nonsense. HTTP and HTML were an anti-feature... The freedom to add cruft, and turn a nice interactive book into an awful DVD Menu of a thing. Things are only slowly improving as web designers and users discover how awful all the flexibility is, and collectively move towards a standard layout, which unfortunately is poorly typed and implemented a hundred different ways.

    If Gopher had simply been improved, and HTML had never been, we wouldn't have "simple" web pages, or "mobile" web pages, because the layout on a phone would be just as good as on a desktop. So very much was lost, and very little was gained.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Gopher was better by yacwroy · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more (although I did just look up Gopher and it needs a lot of work to make it suit).

      However, I don't see any fast way forward. People are dumb, too accepting and too lazy to actively change to something better en masse.

      When more people go to check out your band, your company, etc by way of Wikipedia simply due to its readability and consistency, perhaps things might start to change. Perhaps something like this is the way forward?

      --
      You agree with me.
    2. Re:Gopher was better by LoztInSpace · · Score: 1

      Haha. I think the same about Windows. Love Windows or hate it, at least (untill recently) you could pretty much know where everthing was or how to access stuff(File|save, Tools|options, right-click|properties). What an improvement over what was there before.
      Now, as you correctly point out, almost every site you visit you have to learn it. Not progress in usability that's for sure.
      The Web - great delivery mechanism, sucky user experience.
      And OT - incubating the worst developers we've ever had since I used to type in listings from magazines :)

  62. A negative comment by yacwroy · · Score: 1

    IMO this is the classic case of something getting so big that a superior system can never challenge it.

    The web, to me, is a under-functional core with over-functional (read: insecure and often able to do things against the users' wishes) bolt-on additions (eg java), whose security holes are then repeatedly patched up with incomplete fixes. It's inefficient, kludgy, and very badly misused by web authors.

    A few of the more annoying parts are:

    Some time midway through its history, the idea that content should be adaptable by the user (as was a big initial selling point) got diminished, as you can't adapt scripts or flash. A good example (but only one of a million) is that scripted links usually can't be opened in new tabs.

    The biggest problem (as I see it) is that web authors (for example, /.'s) that have sites perfectly capable of being transmitted in the cleaner, more efficient script-less "old" method choose to go with scripts "because they can", or because it sounds better to say (either to the users or to HQ) our site now has here. These scripts routinely perform erroneously on non-standard browser setups.

    Compared to an optimal replacement for the web, information takes far, far too long to download, for a number of reasons:
    1. Poor caching, especially of "advanced" content.
    2. Various protocols and multiple servers meaning that content can't be sent as one big chunk and must instead require multiple establishments of communication channels).
    3. Lack of compression of much content, such as text and many images.

    IMO, the web is a good pet project suitable for hobbyists and enthusiasts. It's not good enough for prime-time - sad that it's used there.

    --
    You agree with me.
  63. It is really 21 years old by hjbleier · · Score: 1

    November 12, 1990

    1. Re:It is really 21 years old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, I know. Why do stories get so messed up, all people do is repeat instead of report!

  64. NCSA Mosaic - on a VAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably early 1993. I know I had Archie clients on our first graphical VAXstations in 1992, and remember installing an early port of Mosaic. I attended the 3d WWW Conference in 1995, and had a paper at one of the first astronomy-on-the-web conferences the same year.

  65. emacs ftp-by-email FTW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of my first internet experiences was configuring uucp on a sun3 and connecting to a nearby university (go sooners!), then downloading emacs via ftp-by-mail and hand-piecing the myriad of parts together, manually stripping out headers and so forth. It was a several day process.

    And of course I remember www-talk and NCSA Mosaic, as well as Viola and one other, the name of which escapes me at the moment.

  66. 1996 by manwargi · · Score: 1

    AOL 2.5, on a 28.8kbps dial-up modem. It cost $3/hour to connect to the internet, and combine that with the MMOs of those days, I ran up some bills. And, of course I was addicted. I had learned so much and my literary capabilities skyrocketed. It's too bad that there are articles these days of youth becoming worse at English and submitting assignments with emoticons, "ROFLMAO", etc., my vocabulary grew, and in a positive way.

  67. I was late to it. by devphaeton · · Score: 1

    Well... sorta. A friend of mine had an acoustic coupling for his Atari. He demonstrated it by dialing various computers, one of which was (probably) a Sun Micro at NASA's JPL. I wanna say this was about 1987. I thought *that* was cool, but I didn't really grasp the big concept, unfortunately.

    When 1994 came, I saw it again. Unfortunately I didn't have a computer, as I couldn't afford one (I was lucky if I could eat more than once a day, at the time), but I knew I had to participate. It took me until November 1997 to "get online" for the first time.

    My life, health, and sanity has gone downhill since... :-/

    One thing I will say though... It was a HUGE relief and a great turnaround in my life when I discovered IRC. Thousands of nerdy, socially awkward guys (and a few girls) who I could kind of 'feel at home' with. We talked about computers, we talked about electronics, we talked about cars and cooking and science to every depth I wanted to take it. I never really had that before. Labels (soc, jock, nerd, rockstar) are dumb, I know... But to spend 23 or so years of your life feeling completely alienated and entirely unlike anyone else you've ever met, but then suddenly discover that there's a whole world of people just like you, with the same interests, feelings, desires, faults and intentions...

    It sure meant a lot. :'-)

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
  68. Early starter... by Trracer · · Score: 1

    Back in 1992 (when I was in highschool) I hung around with some older friends who brought me to the local uni computer club and showed me the world of MUDs, IRC and the alt.sex.* groups on usenet. A year later (final year of highschool) I interned at the uni (physics dept) but spent most of my time at the computer club (as an "employee" I was allowed to be a member) handling their backups and doing software maintenance (and spending a load of time on my favourite MUD).

    Must have been around that time when a friend of mine showed me this application called "Mosaic" that I really didn't understand what it was used for. A couple of years later, basically when Netscape came out I made my first page.

    Nowadays in my mid 30's I'm an IBM:er, handling banking software and computers are turning out to be more of a bore (except computer games).

    --
    English is not my first language, so cut me some slack -: Om du kan lasa det har sa kan du Svenska :-
  69. My first experiance with the web by JonySuede · · Score: 1

    My first experience with the web was in 1994 at sherbrooke u, my mon was working there and she had access to a 486dx4 100 equipped with nsca mosaic and trumpet winsock.

    My first search was on yahoo, I search for the Mona Lisa and I found tits. My mom was outraged but I was delighted. I then persuaded her to allow my to on the web and find the real Louvre picture. Next years, after 9 month of begging I received as a gift 60hr of INTERNET by month, my only restriction was no child porn and no bestiality, I never violated those sane restrictions and I regularly thanks my parents to have allowed my to come on the Internet at such a young age.

    --
    Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    1. Re:My first experiance with the web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry for the bad as fuck English I am drunk as hell

  70. TFA seems a bit confused by madprof · · Score: 1

    "There's something devilishly simple about the web on a theoretical level: create a network of wires, put a terminal in every home and business, and share information on top of it."

    Mmm, I'm pretty sure this is called "The Internet". Also I'm not sure how Napster and AudioGalaxy related to the Web, given they used proprietary protocols.
    As the Wired article stats, the terms "Web" and "Internet" are now considered pretty much synonymous by the general public. And lazy journalists.

  71. 1992 and Lynx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I started using lynx when the first messages about the Web and the coming Mozaic started appearing on various academic mailing lists. It seemed a good step up from gopher.

  72. Amiga! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Proudly using the tubes since Amiga 500 times.

  73. 1993/1994 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was a software engineer at the US Department of Agriculture and was asked in 1993 or 1994 to check out Netcom IX (I think that was what they were called back then - they later became Earthlink) and their graphic browser and see what it offered. My verbal report the next day was that the Web was the future of the Internet and we needed to get going immediately. And we did get going a few years later. I remember in 1996 a student coming to a grad class at GMU a bit late because he had been entranced by HotJava. The well-known professor in that class declared that his job was over and that in short time education would be totally Web driven and that the Web would become a universal OS (this prof. is a systems guy BTW). In retrospect heady, if not necessarily accurate in terms of projection of future events, times.

  74. First experience? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mosaic 1.0 for Mac. Still have the floppy, and the last time I checked is was still readable. That and a BBS in a basement at the University of Denver.

  75. 1993--A Text Document on Steroids by ShannonBrown · · Score: 1

    University of Wisconsin-Madison A professor mentioned something new called "hyperlinked" documents. An over-the-shoulder demonstration in the computer lab (I seem to recall on a Mac but not certain) was intriguing. The thought at the time, if I recall, was for powerful bibliographic and definitional documents for research purposes. Remember, this was only a simple text document (black and white display) with underlined text that could be "clicked on" to open a new, related document associated with the underlined term. That is, the example I saw would have been a sample article with, perhaps, a word or term underlined/linked. About three years later (c.1996), I ordered my first book from a strange, online bookstore named Amazon .... (Then again, in 1993, that was in the age of using KERMIT to download email list-servs to read at home. Another time ....)

  76. I remember this clearly by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine showed me Mosaic with a web page open. I took a look at it and said "That'll never catch on" and went back to typing into my FTP session. It was at the computer lab of Tomball community college in Tomball, TX. I was busy searching for Warez at the time if I recall correctly and couldn't be bothered.

    --
    The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.