Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Airline Pilots Allowed To Dodge Security Screening

Posted by Soulskill on from the dramatis-personae-for-the-security-theatre dept.

OverTheGeicoE writes "Wired has a story about TSA's known crewmember program, which allows airline pilots to bypass traditional airport security on their way to the cockpit. Pilots will be verified using a system known as CrewPASS that relies on uniforms, identity cards, fingerprints, and possibly other biometrics to authenticate flight deck crews. Once they are authenticated, they can enter secure areas in airports without any further screening. Participation at present is voluntary, and applies at Baltimore/Washington (BWI), Pittsburg (PIT), Columbia (CAE) and now Chicago O'Hare (ORD) airports. TSA is hoping to expand the program nationally. Bruce Schneier thinks this program is 'a really bad idea.' Pilots are already avoiding scanners and patdowns at security checkpoints (video). Is the new program just a way for TSA to hide this fact from the flying public?"

5 of 285 comments (clear)

  1. How is this a problem? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Couldn't a pilot who's convinced to pull off a terrorist attack just, well -- do it? They are at the controls and all...

    1. Re:How is this a problem? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

      Kind of like you-know-who did you-know-when?

      No, I don't know when Voldemort took over an airplane!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:How is this a problem? by Ieshan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is not really preventing pilots from carrying guns on planes. It's preventing people who look like pilots from being given special security breaks and dealing with the costs associated with preventing that while reaping only minimal gains from not scanning pilots.

      This essay: https://www.schneier.com/essay-130.html by Schneier does a fantastic job at explaining the problem. The basic synopsis is:
      1) Security is a system, and for all the easy changes you make ("Let's not screen pilots, that makes no sense!"), you actually need to build tons of other systems (Databases to validate pilot IDs, training for security personnel to access those databases, hard to forge ID cards to identify pilots, etc).
      2) Because of those things you didn't think of in (1), and because security is a zero-sum game, all the dollars you spend building security systems to deal with pilots and all the minutes that you save not screening them could have been spent doing more impactful things that make everyone safer and reduce time at the security checkpoint for less money.

      Basically, with limited resources and the hidden costs of not scanning pilots, is it worth it to not scan pilots? Probably not.

    3. Re:How is this a problem? by element-o.p. · · Score: 5, Informative

      Lucky you.

      My wife and my step-daughter have BOTH been fondled at airports. I have had to boot laptops. My step-daughter was asked to go through the electronic nudie-scope on her last flight, and told TSA no.

      Just because it hasn't happened to you doesn't mean it isn't happening, and it definitely doesn't mean people shouldn't be incensed about TSA's abusive, degrading, demeaning security theater. If that makes me a "malcontent", so be it.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  2. Simple theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work at an international airport. There's only one gate between the street and the runway. The 'guards' routinely flag us through from over 100 feet away if we so much as hold up something that looks remotely like it might be a badge. I've held up credit cards, library cards, and once, the Queen of Diamonds. So why in the hell should I submit to a full body X-ray operated by someone without a medical degree, or submit to sexual molestation if I refuse that? Is that supposed to make me feel safe?