Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Exec Responds To the Google-Motorola Deal
adeelarshad82 writes "In a statement released yesterday, Microsoft's Windows Phone Division President Andy Lees said 'Investing in a broad and truly open mobile ecosystem is important for the industry and consumers alike, and Windows Phone is now the only platform that does so with equal opportunity for all partners.' What's interesting is that even though some analysts are actually expecting OEMs to switch their focus to Windows Phone 7, past sales figures (especially for Samsung) show that the decision to do so might not come easily."
I mean, android is what 47% of smartphones, and Microsoft Windows 7 around 2%.
Keep on wishing bitches!
And Microsoft is lecturing the tech world about being open and free with software. I'm pretty sure that's one of the signs of apocalypse.
So when Microsoft says this:
Windows Phone is now the only platform that does so with equal opportunity for all partners.'
Does that mean that everyone gets billions of dollars from MS?
http://thenextweb.com/microsoft/2011/04/21/nokia-and-microsoft-deal-official-definitive-agreement-signed/
As a result of the deal, Nokia will pay Microsoft royalties for the Windows Phone platform, starting only when the Finnish company launches its first Windows Phone devices. Microsoft has also agreed to make payments to Nokia “measured in the billions of dollars” for services but also intellectual property royalties.
Or are we supposed to believe that MS would have paid for Nokia's IP even if Nokia hadn't switched to Windows Phone?
I love how it's assumed that somehow the acquisition of Moto will make Android less open to the Android alliance members... I guess that's the normal tactic. Spread FUD.
Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
Given how in bed MS and nokia are, I can't see the 3rd party manufacturers all that happy. This now means that the lead, and pure platform for Android will probably be a motorolo product, and google didn't just spend 12 billion dollars to only make prototypes. The Nexus one, nexus S and presumably now Nexus M will follow with the Nexus M2 or whatever.
The MS nokia hookup is equally troublesome. Not that MS can't afford to lose what it has put into Nokia, but as Nokia continues to falter until there's a big new WP7 push it may fall to MS to open the wallet and keep them afloat. That puts other manufacturers in a bind. They don't want to put out something NokiaSoft* is going to obsolete in a heartbeat, and they don't want to find that Nokia sinks and MS abandons the WP7 platform.
*I'm referring to the sub $1000 phone market. The > $1000/phone market is a whole other ball game. I doubt anyone else is going to jump headlong into the 20k/unit smartphone market the way nokia had been, but who knows.
Once they ran Palm into the dirt, they basically ignored Windows Mobile developers. Now that new competitors have arisen, they act like they care about the mobile segment. You can't poop on developers and expect them to put any faith in your platform again.
That and Windows Mobile sucks as a mobile or embedded platform. My cable box is WM based and it sucks too!
I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
That's not true.
Google is firmly committed to a vendor neutral policy with Android and the Motorola Mobility subsidiary will be firewalled off from Google and independently managed to ensure that stays true.
In fact, Google would be happy to see their own investments obliterated by their handset competitors... eh, I mean partners... and their own handset division becoming a bottomless cash sink, as long as it helps advance the Android platform.
So, Microsoft really needs to stop with the FUD and accept that Google really is an altruistic and idealistic organization that truly cares only about making life better for everyone.
Straight from their own mouth
* Nokia will help drive and define the future of Windows Phone.
* Nokia and Microsoft will closely collaborate on development, joint marketing initiatives and a shared development roadmap
They are both in bed with a hardware manufacturer now, have both claimed it won't affect other licenses of the OS, and both have something to loose if they alienate the other OEMs.
Poor Nokia suffered the Osborne Effect, whereby sales of current available products plummet after the announcement of un-available 'future' products.
Things have changed a lot! In my little world, Microsoft is of no consequence, and that's a good thing. I will not touch Microsoft products (including NOKIA), as a matter of principal.
The word you're looking for is "dilute", the act of dilution. Words can't think so it would be difficult to "delude" them as I don't think they can have delusions.
The Master (Angelo Rossitto) in Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome, "Not shit, energy!"
Seriously? The definition we all think as an "open ecosystem" is the PC. The opposite of an "open ecosystem" is the Apple Apps Store or locked down cell phones.
All I have to say to MS is "show me". Words are cheap.
d
all language nazi's will burne in heil!
Only Windows Phone 7 has the kind of Quality, Stability, Security, Reliability and Robustness that you have come to expect from the Microsoft name.
(I'll pause for a moment so you can stop laughing.)
Remember Windows Mobile?
Sidekick / Danger?
Windows Kin Phone?
Remember Microsoft and Sendo? (You can google for it. I said google, not bing.)
I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
Or the ... wait for it ... MicroPhone.
Sorry.
There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
Considering MS is second only to Apple in outright denials of things they're actively pursuing and ready to pull the trigger on, how long until Microsoft just outright buys Nokia?
Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
This type of "analysis" is what you expect from Gardiner. It's nonsense. You're bang on. The fact of the matter is that there's consumer demand for Android, and there isn't for Windows Phone.
The handset makers will go where the sales are and expecting them to pay Microsoft for a platform that people don't want over a free one that people do want is lunacy. It's not happening. This only changes if Microsoft can drum up some demand for WP7 hardware. Maybe Nokia can do that.
-- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
And it's only in the US.
Worldwide it's much grimmer for MS, but in the US it's pretty bad.
Windows Phone 7 wasn't the first release of Microsoft's smartphone OS. Yeah, WP7 is newer than the iPhone, but the first smartphone-specific WinCE-based OS was Windows Smartphone 2002, which was 5 years before the iPhone. Now, Windows Smartphone 200x and Windows Mobile (after the PocketPC and Smartphone lines got a common branding) never were as popular as iPhone/iOS devices became as soon as the latter were available, but it has got nothing to do with "first mover" advantage, it has to do with customer perception of value, which Apple managed to generate where Microsoft hadn't (and still, for the most part, hasn't.)
That would explain a slowly degrading Android marketshare driven by upgrades with new users not particularly attracted to Android, it doesn't explain the reality of Android, and to a lesser extent iOS, continuing to have growing smartphone marketshare while RIM, Microsoft, and Symbian continue to lose ground. Those trends are explained by Android and iOS continuing to lead in the battle for customer-perceived value, not merely hanging on to users they already have because it is a pain to leave.