Slashdot Mirror


What If Aliens Came To Save the Galaxy From Mankind?

astroengine writes with an amusing piece in Discovery. From the article: "In a study carried out by NASA and Pennsylvania State University scientists, several intelligent extraterrestrial encounter scenarios are examined. One of the scenarios is a sci-fi favorite: what if we encounter an alien race hellbent on destroying us? However, there's a twist. This isn't mindless thuggery on behalf of the aliens, and they're not killing us to get at our natural resources; they have a cause. They want to exterminate us for the greater good of the Milky Way."

54 of 534 comments (clear)

  1. It's our own damn fault by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    We could always have voiced our objections against the interstellar express route.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:It's our own damn fault by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Hey, I didn't make the rules, bureaucracy applies to everyone equally. If humankind can't be assed to leave its planet, it's not the fault of the intergalactic bureaucratic agency.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:It's our own damn fault by JWW · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For less than 3% of the current US defense budget, you could FULLY FUND NASA!!

      Why the HELL is NASA always the FIRST thing talked about when cutting, and Defense always the LAST.

      Or Defense budget is OBSCENE.

      I refuse to acknowledge anyone who is "fiscally conservative" who's first priority is not cutting the Defense budget.

      I'm looking at you tea party!!

    3. Re:It's our own damn fault by mosinu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually first on the block should be foreign aid. Then I would agree with cutting defense as well as any and every other program out there with NO exceptions.

    4. Re:It's our own damn fault by AngryDeuce · · Score: 2

      Hell, I'd be happy if our defense budget was actually spent on our defense, and not proxy wars on behalf of international corporations.

      If Big Oil wants to secure oil reserves in countries hostile to the US they should hire their own army of mercenaries and pay for it themselves.

    5. Re:It's our own damn fault by tagno25 · · Score: 2

      For less than 3% of the current US defense budget, you could FULLY FUND NASA!!

      Why the HELL is NASA always the FIRST thing talked about when cutting, and Defense always the LAST.

      /quote>

      What is even worse is that since 1958-2010 NASA only spent $471.23 billion and the defense budget in 2010 was $685.1 billion.

    6. Re:It's our own damn fault by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually first on the block should be foreign aid. Then I would agree with cutting defense as well as any and every other program out there with NO exceptions.

      Better yet. Cut farmers'subsidies. Then foreign farmers won't have to compete with artificially cheap USA/EU food (even in their local markets). Then foreign help will be not so necessary and you probably can cut it, too. And probably there will be less for bases everywhere and you can cut Defense spending!!.

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    7. Re:It's our own damn fault by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Foreign aid is a tiny sneeze compared to military spending when you factor in pensions. Cutting military spending now is the key to cutting pension spending later, provided the cost cutting is accompanied by force reduction and not just compromising quality.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:It's our own damn fault by Inda · · Score: 2

      I'm not having a go, because it's the same here in the UK, but call it what it is.

      It is an offense or attack budget. We have nothing to defend against.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    9. Re:It's our own damn fault by Hamsterdan · · Score: 3, Funny

      *For less than 3% of the current US defense budget, you could FULLY FUND NASA!!

      Why the HELL is NASA always the FIRST thing talked about when cutting, and Defense always the LAST.*

      Because they didn't find oil in space ?

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    10. Re:It's our own damn fault by Miamicanes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As good as it feels to hate farm subsidies, they do serve a halfway useful purpose -- they basically eliminate famine and domestic shortage in exchange for higher total costs the other 95% of the time. Seriously... when's the last time you *ever* heard the word "famine" used in the context of "United States" or "Post-WWII non-Soviet-Bloc Europe"? If farmers operated purely without subsidy in a profit-maximizing way, they'd simply risk a bad food-free year every 10-20 years in exchange for .73% higher profits the next quarter. If one or two farmers did it, nobody would notice. If the American Agribusiness Industry acted like California's power-generation and transmission industry, we'd have a domestic crisis every time locusts descended upon Arkansas or Kansas (or at least poorer countries would, because the US would buy up most of their food).

      Subsidizing dead industries is a bad thing, but there's a lot to be said for year-to-year stability as well. Would anybody who's sane *really* choose to save 1.9% per year in the long (25+ year horizon) run on groceries if it meant that prices at the store could soar overnight without warning, even if it meant that next year the same goods might be selling for pennies on the dollar? People have better things to do than spend their days researching prices and plan their purchase strategies for things they use daily at spot-market prices.

      The reason for subsidies is simple -- it encourages farmers to plant enough to guarantee abundance under nearly any likely scenario, without leaving them trying to sell those same crops during a "good" year for less than they would have made by simply investing the season's crop capital in 6-month CDs and going on vacation somewhere. Gratuitous waste sucks, but shortage & famine is much, much worse.

    11. Re:It's our own damn fault by Kelbear · · Score: 2

      That's an interesting point that I hadn't considered. Thanks!

    12. Re:It's our own damn fault by plasm4 · · Score: 2

      Interesting until you see the 9 countries ahead of it and it makes sense. Most of the money spent on military by the 9 countries ahead as a percentage of GDP, get the money from the US anyway, either through oil sales or military aid. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures

    13. Re:It's our own damn fault by gumbi+west · · Score: 2

      Uh, I'd rather have to rest on, "we're doing better than Chad" for an argument.

    14. Re:It's our own damn fault by Denogh · · Score: 2

      **as you suggest, not "TV suggest", which is gibberish.

    15. Re:It's our own damn fault by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A lot of our foreign aid is actually homeland security driven, and is something promoted and voted for more by the conservative side of the congress.
                    Take the whole area around Columbia, for example. The DEA provides drug interdiction helicopters to destroy Cocaine crops. This gives Columbia whole squadrons of assault helicopters, and the people who fly them become some of Columbia's best trained and 'well-bloodied' troops from actual under fire experience. They get really advanced communications tech we don't normally export, just so cartels can't eavesdrop on their communications, and eventually they even get attack helicopters such as Apaches, to support the mission when the cartels start using rocket launchers. This makes all Columbia's neighbors wonder, "What happen if they uses all those shiny toys for something besides drug interdiction inside their own borders?"
                But, the DEA can't afford to just buy more weapons for everybody, and it would look fishy buying them for countries that don't even produce much Cocaine, so funding gets added to various places in Central America's foreign aid budget, money that has attached stipulations that those countries buy certain US made weapons systems with it. Then the conservatives that wanted a bigger war on drugs and more profits for General Dynamics tell everyone that Foreign Aid is a liberal thing, without mentioning that this would mean programs such as the DEA and indeed the whole Military/Industrial Complex are Liberal plots. There are a dozen senators today who are to the right of Jesse Helms who regularly criticise foreign aid in public addresses, and would be appalled if the public really tried to cut back foreign aid enough to defund these special programs hidden in it

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    16. Re:It's our own damn fault by Guppy · · Score: 2

      An anwer of "Cut foreign aid" is usually the first sign someone doesn't have a very good grasp of just where our budget goes:

      http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/brunitedstatescanadara/670.php

      Asked to estimate how much of the federal budget goes to foreign aid the median estimate is 25 percent. Asked how much they thought would be an "appropriate" percentage the median response is 10 percent.

      In fact just 1 percent of the federal budget goes to foreign aid.

      In terms of percent GDP, the U.S. is already among the more miserly of the developed nations. And don't forget, giving foreign aid is not done simply for humanitarian feel-good reasons. It is often done to secure political and military co-operation from third world nations.

    17. Re:It's our own damn fault by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2

      Foreign aid is a tiny percentage of the budget, less than 1%. But it gives us leverage over the beneficiary countries, and helps them to promote our interests in their region. We don't give out foreign aid because we are sweethearts; we get something out of the deal.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  2. We're no danger to the Galaxy... by Mage66 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At our technological level, we pose no danger to anything off this planet.

    It would be like saying you'll sterilize a grain of sand to protect the planet.

    Such a silly scenario...

    If we ever develop interstellar travel that is fast, cheap and practical, maybe then this scenario starts to have legs.

    1. Re:We're no danger to the Galaxy... by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 2

      Spoken like a true primative unaware @Ffnnllij$##*!. The environmental damage you are causing to @Ffnnllij$##*! is atrocious beyond imagining. Just because you are a developing planet does not excuse your crimes against sentience, non-sentience living and even common quarks. Human, you disgust me worse than the acts of Grivaloud the Liatonajikirous.

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    2. Re:We're no danger to the Galaxy... by Gaygirlie · · Score: 2

      At our technological level, we pose no danger to anything off this planet.

      Not now, no. But once we advance enough technologically and can actually move around in space with relative easy...well, mankind has shown extraordinary talent for selfishness and greed and wanton destruction of even our own planet just to please our short-term interests. If we do this to our OWN planet then what do you think we would do to something where we do not live?

      I'd actually be pretty sympathetic with the aliens and wouldn't mind them annihilating the human race completely.

    3. Re:We're no danger to the Galaxy... by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 2

      In case that grain of sand was contaminated with, say, a fast-spreading, airborne Ebola variant, I'd consider sterilizing it indeed. And rather before I'd have to sterilize a whole city the thermonuclear way...

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    4. Re:We're no danger to the Galaxy... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2

      On one hand I agree, but on the other I think that's also extrapolating a bit too much of our way of thinking onto an alien species. To us, that kind of future might feel very distant and not in any way written in stone. But a species with a far longer lifespan, or one which doesn't even experience age related death anymore, might not look at things within the same timeframe. And what seems like free will and complex choices in social development to us might seem like little more than easily predictable blind instinct to them.

      That said, I do agree the concept is pretty silly. I think it's pretty certain that if aliens were able to get here in the first place, that shows a level of technology we couldn't do anything against even if it was an enemy we understood. I suspect the main motivation was people wondering if they could get paid for sitting around and talking scifi for the day. Can't say I blame them if that's the case.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    5. Re:We're no danger to the Galaxy... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      Depends on what you mean by danger. Physical threat, probably not, but what about ideas? Religions, for example, are self-replicating ideas that can spread throughout human populations. It's (barely) plausible that we may be broadcasting something that has a similar effect on non-human minds.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:We're no danger to the Galaxy... by JWW · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why the heck is it so popular nowadays for many humans to be so anti-human?

      The goal of EVERY species on this planet is its continued survival, us included. Of course, not all species succeed.

      WE are only species on the planet uniquely equipped to have even a chance of surviving the inevitable destruction of the Earth. Hell, we would undoubtedly save a few other species while we're at it.

      I just don't get this "HUMANS BAD" crap that so many are spewing.

      Golden path anyone???

    7. Re:We're no danger to the Galaxy... by JWW · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So if we start spreading to other worlds, then a spacefaring race that by definition would have spread to other worlds would come to kill us for our spreading to other worlds.

      As noble as everyone is trying to make the aliens case sound, it would be as wrong as any other mass genocide has been.

      The case of killing us because we're in their way I can understand.

      The case of killing us because its a noble thing to do is total bullshit.

    8. Re:We're no danger to the Galaxy... by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a perfectly normal pattern of behaviour for a species to exhibit, especially an apex predator like mankind.

    9. Re:We're no danger to the Galaxy... by tmosley · · Score: 2

      Depends on how strongly those natives affirm the concept of property rights. For example, nations of people like India, China, and Japan, which strongly affirmed property rights were conquered by force of arms, but survived as cultures. Native American tribes and civilizations that recognized property rights were much more likely to survive and remain intact than those that didn't (think Hopi and such), while even the savage Spanish occupation was unable to wipe out the cultures they dominated for so long. Those people survived because of their recognition of property rights, meaning they were less likely to attack innocents on the invading side, which triggered massive campaigns of vengeance seen in the US.

      Similarly, in the event of alien settlement on Earth, it would more than likely be peaceful. They might take over our governance, but genocide is unlikely because on the whole humanity now does a fairly good job of recognizing property rights, and for the most part we don't kill large groups of people to get their stuff (at least not in the East or the West, outside of the occasional war over oil started by our dumbassed governments).

    10. Re:We're no danger to the Galaxy... by SydShamino · · Score: 2

      In something like David Brin's Uplift universe, pre-sapient species (chimpanzees, dolphins, gorillas) are protected at all costs, as they represent the future species that can be developed into the galaxy's next generation of sentient life. A species like ours that has greatly depleted them - and hasn't really done much in the way of technological or social progress (from the view of a spacefaring race) with our intelligent might be considered a lost cause, and could be wiped out to give room for our planet's other options to grow.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    11. Re:We're no danger to the Galaxy... by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 2

      I think it's mostly because of the stupidity displayed by the human race, we're too stupid to survive.

      We might master the atom and fire, but we're still stupid beasts when it comes down to it, as our lifestyle clearly shows. We're still driven by basic animal urges, we just apply them to different things.

    12. Re:We're no danger to the Galaxy... by corbettw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anyone who has mastered FTL travel will be impossible to stop. They could bounce around us whenever we got close enough to engage.

      If they've mastered accelerating physical objects to even a significant fraction of c, then they could wipe us out before we even know about them just by slamming an object (any object) into any point on the earth.

      So preparing for a future hostile encounter with aliens where they don't care about our resources or ourselves is pointless. The fight will be over before we've realized it's begun.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    13. Re:We're no danger to the Galaxy... by invid · · Score: 2

      Here are some likely factors that will determine the nature of our first alien encounter: 1) Any civilization that has developed practical interstellar travel will also probably have the medical technology to make themselves nigh immortal. 2) Even at speeds of 10 percent the speed of light, it would take an interstellar civilization a mere 5 million years to colonize the Milky Way Galaxy. 3) Any behavioral norms the immortal interstellar beings started with first came into being by natural selection, but then will probably have been modified by cultural selection, then by a high technology environment we can only speculate on. We have no idea what they think of the concepts of "good" and "evil". 4) At our current technological level we could not fight back if they decided to destroy us. 5) Since technological civilizations are probably relatively rare in the universe, it is likely they would want to study our development without interference. Given these factors, if there is an interstellar civilization in this galaxy there is probably 1 dominant one observing the rest. I personally hope we are the most advanced, otherwise the Milky Way is already taken.

      --
      The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
    14. Re:We're no danger to the Galaxy... by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 2

      I didn't say environmentalism was the problem, it's the sociopaths hanging off the bottom of it that are the problem.

    15. Re:We're no danger to the Galaxy... by daem0n1x · · Score: 2

      A self-correcting problem, IMHO. When we completely fuck up the Earth, we are fucking ourselves. When we become extinct, the Earth will continue happily as ever. Maybe intelligent centipedes will dominate the planet in 10 million years from now.

    16. Re:We're no danger to the Galaxy... by geminidomino · · Score: 2

      and an "out of the sun" trajectory so we have no idea what's coming.

      And that's only if they're feeling generous. They could go all SAW *number whatever* on us and make sure we're fully aware of what's coming for the extra wailing and gnashing of teeth.

      *shudder* Okay, I just creeped myself the hell out.

    17. Re:We're no danger to the Galaxy... by bonch · · Score: 2

      Speaking of which, this is a video everyone should watch: George Carlin on saving the planet

  3. Been done by Nursie · · Score: 2

    Alastair Reynolds explores this scenario in his Revelation Space series. The inhibitors come to eat anyone that progresses too far to keep a greater threat in check (IIRC).

    Fantastic space opera, if you haven't read them yet.

  4. twist? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2

    I thought that was a staple scenario in its entirety. I saw The Day the Earth Stood Still (both of them) where the aliens come to say "yo, we've come to save the earth. From you losers".

    One twist is where the aliens think they need to save the earth from us, but really we're the good guys in a galactic conspiracy (or bureaucracy), like David Brin's Uplift trilogy.

  5. Gone straight to plaid, right past ludicrous by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Insightful

    really, the global warming scare factory blew right past hyperactive speed and went straight to plaid.

    It is crap like this that makes it hard for many to believe there are is any seriousness in the global warming let alone man causing it or making it worse. I cringed while reading this article. I am not sure if its more of a creepy cringe or just offensive to real thinking

    Its time to get the zealots out of the lead roles, they are no more than Bible thumping tent preachers, whats next, snakes?

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  6. What bilge by medcalf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The perfect storm of magical thinking and self hatred.

    --
    -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
    1. Re:What bilge by couchslug · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "The perfect storm of magical thinking and self hatred."

      Religion called, citing prior art.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  7. Aliens have no free will by swehack · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think it's unlikely, and not just because the Universe is huge and travelling at the speed of light is a paradox. (not a scientist) Simple social observations, we have free will, our free will creates great works of art, science, invention, engineering, we think outside the box because we have unique perspectives on life. Just like all things, this comes with a downside. The downside is of course that not all of us think about art when we think outside the box, some think about murdering people and exploiting them for their resources. So to assume that an alien race where they have achieved the goals of intergalactic space travel through free thought and innovation, the idea that this alien race would think we were more evil than them because we wage wars and kill each other is laughable. Because if they have the same free will, the same free innovation and free thinking free spirited individuals as we do then they would by that logic have the same evil, the same murders and the same exploitation.

    1. Re:Aliens have no free will by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      And what if they don't? What if they are machines, which were explicitly built by some biological, space travelling aliens to stop a war, but unfortunately they forgot to tell the robots that destroying all life was no acceptable way to end war. Analysing the life forms around them, the robots, following only their programmed goal, determined that the only way to end war was to destroy all life, and started doing so. Those robots also were built to multiply themselves (to save production cost). After they eliminated the aliens who built them (and their enemies as well), those robots spread throughout the galaxy, and whenever they find life they also find war, and thus they follow their programmed mission to stop war, which they do by killing all life. And some day they reach Earth ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  8. and nothing of value would be lost by rbrausse · · Score: 2

    the paper describes plenty of contact scenarios, but I like the cherry-picking: only doomsday references are TFS-worthy

  9. Is this a joke? by rayvd · · Score: 2

    This is either a joke or an elaborate ruse by the Tea Party to visually demonstrate government waste...

  10. Re:And they did this... why? by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 2

    What is with the Ender's books? I heard of it so I read the first one. It is just like a bad high school movie (shy young boy who has a glorious fate, who is a do-gooder but kills whoever gets in his path because he is "forced to do", and who becomes a world hero by playing video games and not risking anything). I realize it is ideal for nerdsturbation and nerdgasms, but didn't think that alone was enough to suppress critical thinking of so many people.

    --
    Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
  11. It's already happened. by lexsird · · Score: 4, Funny

    Aliens did land here to destroy us, but they were small and insect like and the bug exterminator guy killed their entire galactic fleet, thinking they were some "weirdo bug infestation". A second attempt was tried by another species, and aquatic one, but it got ate by sharks. A third one came, land based and they were bigger, but were ate by the wild life. A fourth came and the RF that we are immune to quickly burned out their brains, and they too were ate by wild life.

    A mechanical race came and was destroyed by a thunderstorm, when a bolt of lightning struck their ship and it exploded. Of course there have been several small missions which end up in races being consumed by just the biological aspects of our planet. Germs, viruses, and an assortment of microbes tend to make short work of them if they don't use the proper environmental protocols.

    Not to mention we are a biological weapon to 99.9999999% of the species in the known universe. Many in the galaxy speculate that the "creator" an extra dimensional entity that instilled the creation codes, was being some kind of a dickhead when he instilled the planetary creation code for this planet. Many speculate and fear that we are doomsday weapon made by said "creator", some want to destroy us, others think we have some special link with the "creator" and should just stay away at least.

    Considering we breath poisoned gas, we are mostly water, which is a universal solvent that eats through many species on contact. We live near oceans of water which scare most species. We are larger than most species by far and are physically more capable. We have lived in a constant state of war with each other since before our history, hence we are really good at it and durable, some how we fight each other so hard, yet our species is over populated. Which is a terrifying aspect of us, we breed so fast compared to most species.

    Most species pray that we will just kill ourselves off. Others are convinced we will achieve the technology to travel about the universe, hence over running it in a matter of eons. But it's galactic law that nobody gives us any aid, and any species that tries to cultivate us is punished. Often rich juveniles from a species will buzz Planet Earth to impress a mate or mates, only to get shot down, spotted or crash; many escape, but its still risky behavior that if caught gets severe punishments.

    Mostly we are immune to solar radiation, in fact we bath in it to get a tan. Our Sun puts out enough EMP to burn up the nervous system of some delicate species before they even get near Earth. Our skin though we think it's thin in contrast to some of the beasts of the planet, is incredible to most species. It's chemical resistant, radiation resistant, and waterproof which baffles everyone. Shooting an Earthling with an alien water cannon only amuses them. They in fact stole several water cannons and reproduce them as toys under the "Super Soaker" line. An Earthling child with a water gun chills the bones of the hardiest of galactic warriors.

    Lastly, what we can eat is frightening as well. What we eat and drink frightens most species away alone. Most of them would be on our dinner plate, as a delicacy. Not to mention our waste byproducts are the most foul bits of toxic waste in the universe. They have watched us poke and prod everything on our planet and try to eat it. We have even ate each other, which is a horror that most minds can't comprehend in the universe. Not to mention we skin other species and wear them as clothes and trophies.

    Then some have tried to understand us, they have figured out that TV is some form of entertainment to us, not educational, not some history archive. This process drove many species insane. One species was found in some insane collective nightmare after watching Gilligan's Island episodes, they fell into some logic loop and have been catatonic as a species ever since. They have concluded that we as a species are quite insane and it's illegal to attempt to figure us out psychologically.

    Its now

    --
    Take the Red Pill.
    1. Re:It's already happened. by Flipstylee · · Score: 2

      The mind of someone with nothing but time on their hands.

  12. Re:Remember what the term "scientist" used to mean by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 2

    I am going to be the devils'advocate and suppose that it is just the media spin; after all one guy can be an scientific from 8 to 5 and then go to the bar and speculate about what colour ET's underwear was. As long as they did not claim that they were doing something more than "wildly speculating", it is not so grave.

    Anyway, the part (media or participants) who put the enfasis in the science aspect should be feathered, to begin with.

    --
    Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
  13. Re:what's pollution to them? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

    "From what we've seen of the alien planet, the dominant species is working furiously to increase the temperature of the atmosphere, CO2 levels have risen sharply over the last 200-300 years, not long before we were able to pick up faint traces of unnatural radio transmissions from the area. We can only assume that they're an invading species terraforming the planet, and with no other inhabited planets in sight, we must assume their interstellar travel capabilities (and other technology) are far beyond our comprehension. This is why we've decreased our radio signature and have pooled our resources to begin work on erecting a cloaking device outside our solar system to block it from their view. If they detect us, it's only a matter of time before they colonize our planet with its already similar atmosphere (based on their recent slowing of CO2 increase, indicating that they're approaching their target level), and we'd have no chance of defending ourselves with our combat jet aircraft and treaded gun cars. The Bluglobians are the greatest threat known to Klurfkind, we should thank Tr'altef for every day we remain undiscovered by them."

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  14. Re:This is why people don't give NASA enough suppo by nedlohs · · Score: 2

    Given it wasn't funded by NASA, and wasn't done by NASA, and NASA has no involvement at all. What do you propose NASA do about it?

    Ban everyone who is affiliated with NASA from human contact outside of work?

  15. Simple by geekoid · · Score: 2

    what if we encounter an alien race hellbent on destroying us?

    We die.

    Seriously, if they can get here we are no threat to them. If they can get here, then they can send a rock big enough for an extinction event.

    While alien troops landing, an aircraft battle are fun to watch, there the worst way for a space faring race to destroy the life on a planet.

    But again, If there is a galactic civilization, we aren't a threat to them anymore then a primitive tribe of people in the tropical rain forest is a threat to Canada.

    If they did show up, our only logic repsonse "You want us to stop doing 'X'? OK."

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  16. *CORRECTION* Not funded by NASA by WeatherGod · · Score: 2

    The Guardian got it *very* wrong. NASA had nothing to do with this study: http://paleblueblog.org/post/9110304050/some-important-points-of-clarification

  17. What realy happened by Brainman+Khan · · Score: 2

    Earth View
    They came from the sky's in giant mechanical monstrosities and targeted only humans, leaving other creatures alone. Surely its payback for our violent ways or abuse to our ecosystem. When it was over only 10% of the human race remained.

    Alien View
    It was Flerns first big field trip, they were going to harvest kooplas for the harna festival. Due to it being a viska year a substitute for the koopla was discovered in a primitive harva like animal. Unfortunately only about 1 out of 50,000,000 was suitable but they bred quickly. Flern vowed to find the best koopla and beat Klerv once and for all using the harvester his dad bought him for kuska day.