Slashdot Mirror


Windows 8 To Fight Piracy With the Cloud

MrSeb writes "With the latest Windows 8 build (8064) that has been delivered to Intel, it's clear that the company is taking strides to make sure that its upcoming OS isn't quite so easy to pirate. For starters, the generic volume license keys that were so easily exploited during the early days of Windows 7 leaks will no longer be an option for pirates. Product keys also won't be shipped in the prodkey.txt file included in the build packages. Instead, installers will need to retrieve a unique key from a Microsoft web page. There's also a good possibility that the recently-surfaced fast booting patent could come into play as well. If Microsoft does indeed have designs on using a remote server to push OS code to systems at boot time, that code would be a very clever place to embed activation-related programming. Even if a crack was discovered, it would be neatly undone during a subsequent start-up sequence — similar to the way Microsoft's now-idle Windows Steady State could turn back the clock on an entire Windows installation after rebooting." Microsoft has also indirectly confirmed in a recent blog post that Windows 8 will make use of an app store.

27 of 404 comments (clear)

  1. "push OS code to systems at boot time" by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Found it!

    If you no longer even own your full OS and require "pushed OS code at boot time" the Cloud Scam will be complete!

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    1. Re:"push OS code to systems at boot time" by sakdoctor · · Score: 2

      Tethering the OS to external dependencies like this, make it worth less (or maybe even worthless) as an OS to me, regardless of the reason for doing it.
      And yes, linux distros are generally dependent on repositories, but you get to pick which mirror, including your own internal one.

      The cloud and app store marking is hilarious. Inherently inferior mobile/touch inspired interfaces are not going to topple the desktop, because many people have real work to do.

    2. Re:"push OS code to systems at boot time" by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm fairly certain this will apply mainly to consumer versions. The corporate world won't put up with external dependencies like this for any number reasons, so I'm sure copies bought via corporate channels like volume licensing won't be crippled in this way.

      Or maybe I'm wrong, in which case when our next set of upgrades happen in about two or three years, I may in fact be making a strong case for moving from Windows entirely.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:"push OS code to systems at boot time" by Baloroth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't worry. ~80% of Windows 8 users (the other 19.9% are business users) won't be using this "feature", as TPB edition won't have it...

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    4. Re:"push OS code to systems at boot time" by nschubach · · Score: 2

      yes, I copies This Reply using word from This very page with mouse. Who needs keyboard? I just needs someone to supply word.

      (ooc: Nobody wrote copy yet?)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    5. Re:"push OS code to systems at boot time" by guruevi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The VLK license codes are usually the ones used in pirated Windows. The VLK codes are easy to mask when the system dials in (it's not unusual that multiple machines have the same code), they usually unlock all the different flavors Windows comes in and not easy for Microsoft to de-active (unless they want to piss off a major client).

      It doesn't prevent them from doing so, the institution I work at is at it's 3rd or 4th VLK for WinXP and at least one of them is easily found in Google and will fail the 'Genuine' test.

      The problem I find with pushing OS code is that when (not if) a flaw is found in the system or a private key gets found it opens the way for malware to enter into the system and masking as OS boot code it won't be easy to find or remove until it's too late. It's a security incident waiting to happen. The other obvious problems are when the system is not on a network or their systems are not available besides bandwidth. If they allow for systems to run without 'checking in' a crack for the system will easily be built.

      If you haven't already migrated away from Windows, I would recommend doing it soon. There is no reason anymore to stay with it. I have successfully phased it out at my place of employment for both Mac and Linux. Sadly people still depend on MS Office so I still have to donate to Bill Gates' trust fund but it's a bunch cheaper than having to buy Windows, Windows Server, CAL's for every single piece of server software they sell etc.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  2. Gawd by Anrego · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I really hate the direction software and computers are heading.

    I'm not that old.. but it just seems like every new thing makes me cringe. Maybe it's for the best and this is the way people want it, and maybe I'm just too attached to the way things are now (or I guess the way things were) to adapt to all this new thinking, but dammit if I don't feel something I'm passionate about is slipping away.

    Maybe I should just go plant trees for a living or something :(

    1. Re:Gawd by Anrego · · Score: 2

      I'll stick with my gentoo thank you very much ;p

      This was more of a general "direction of the industry" statement than a "oh god, I'm gonna hate the next windows" statement.

    2. Re:Gawd by armanox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I consider Ubuntu to be an example of the problem.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  3. Re:Widows? by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    He died waiting for a license key.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  4. To the roots by iONiUM · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft needs to go back to their roots and remember that their success in the PC market these days can largely (but of course, not entirely) be attributed to the fact that many younger people pirated their OS and used it a lot.

    This is why they should just let piracy go, especially for the OS and Visual Studio, that way when people enter the workforce, they already are accustomed to these things. This is why RIM should be so disturbed that many younger people don't use BlackBerry's anymore; when those younger people enter the workforce, they're going to scream and yell to get their iPhone's and Android's connected to the exchange server.

    It has always been this way, and Microsoft would be stupid to forget it.

    That said, there's the China piracy problem, which is outside of above.. maybe this is targeting that..

  5. Exactly! This is the "Post PC Era" by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

    Microsoft is clearly doing its part in this, by taking actions to kill-off Windows.

    For which effort, I heartily commend them!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  6. +1 by NoSleepDemon · · Score: 2

    I feel the same way as you. I personally took up jogging to get away from all the retarded shit going on in the IT world, and although footwear manufacturers over the world are hellbent on selling me THEIR perfect running product, at least with Americans being by and large as lazy as they are, the ads aren't continuously shoved in my face. I can't even get away from reality with gaming anymore, because people's strange ideas of progress and innovation (social this, social that, always online) have crippled that as well. It seems that, the public at large, couldn't care less about something as long as it's really easy to use and gives them instant gratification. It's truly a shame when your hobby, job or passion gets focus fired by the general public, and suddenly every joe shmoe has an idea of how to improve it. I walked passed an HMV today with big signs up proclaiming "EPIC SALE!", I imagined walking in there with a chaingun.

  7. As a Linux user... by bmo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm OK with this.

    The sooner the theft of Microsoft products ends the better. Turn all the knobs to 11, Mr. Ballmer. The sound of gnashing teeth will be as sweet as Beethoven's Pastoral symphony.

    --
    BMO

  8. Re:Widows? by hosecoat · · Score: 2

    "Microsoft's now-idle Windows Steady State could turn back the clock an entire Windows[sic] installation after rebooting."

    I've already had Windows inadvertently wipe an install after reboot.

  9. Re:Great, an OS that requires you to be online. by Skarecrow77 · · Score: 2

    or you could, you know, just stick with windows 7? It's the new xp or 98se, they're going to be supporting this thing for years and years...

  10. Re:Here it begins.. the FUD by recoiledsnake · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well of course these speculations should be taken as that until MS locks down features. Those articles you link deal with panic over MS enforcing anti-piracy for third parties. However given the history of MS pushing for more anti-piracy features of the OS itself such concerns are not neccesarily FUD. My main concern with that would be the false positives. Having been inconvenienced with calling MS for them to bless my installation of Windows for no apparent reason I can say it's a concern.

    Lets take this from the article:

    With the latest Windows 8 build (8064) that has been delivered to Intel, it’s clear that the company is taking strides to make sure that its upcoming OS isn’t quit so easy to pirate. For starters, the generic volume license keys that were so easily exploited during the early days of Windows 7 leaks will no longer be an option for pirates. Product keys also won’t be shipped in the prodkey.txt file included in the build packages. Instead, installers will need to retrieve a unique key from a Microsoft web page.

    That was the case for Windows 7 Beta and RC releases as well,with the keys expiring in 1 year. Don't see anything new here, the article does cite any sources except a build to Intel which is obviously a preview build which always required you to get a key from Microsoft web pages to operate.

    --
    This space for rent.
  11. Re:Great, an OS that requires you to be online. by recoiledsnake · · Score: 2

    Already happened.

    http://securityandthe.net/2008/08/22/rumor-confirmed-both-fedora-and-redhat-servers-hacked/

    In connection with the incident, the intruder was able to sign a small
      number of OpenSSH packages relating only to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
      (i386 and x86_64 architectures only) and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 (x86_64
      architecture only).

    http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/87516/Debian_Project_servers_hacked

    http://www.cio.com.au/article/369912/free_software_foundation_software_repository_hacked/

    Oops wrong OS! Please continue with the regularly scheduled bashing, i mean programming, Slashdot.

    --
    This space for rent.
  12. Re:Gawd - There's a cost involved by kawabago · · Score: 2

    This will enable Microsoft's dream of rented software. You pay every time you use their software. Since Android is free, this is going to flop in the market. No one will want to pay Microsoft when they can use open source for free.

  13. lol @ Microsoft by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

    You spent how many millions on your anti-piracy tactics and we all know it'll be cracked within a month of release.

    What happens when my computer doesn't have an internet connection? Are you going to drop the ENTIRE laptop market? No... You're going to have to account for that, and that will be exploited.

    The ONLY way to fight piracy is to lower your prices. Sell windows for $30 a box (probably what you're selling it to Dell for anyway) and it wont be worth anyone's time to pirate.

  14. Re:Deja Vu by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Informative

    I normally have respect for haiyfeet as his comments contribute a lot and he knows what he is talking about.

    In terms of DRM ...
    IN actually, I find a lot more pirated versions of Windows XP than Windows 7 on a popular torrent site. The windows 7 ones were hackjobs taht required a special bootloader from some guy (seperate download) and with the hacks you get a Windows 7 OS but you can't use Windows update for patch 2334. Some give error messages a lot and so on.

    Maybe there is a perfect pirated Windows 7 professional edition out there, but after reading this I decided to stick with Windows 7 home premium with these hassles. Windows XP has been hacked awhile back.

    I have not seen a hacked version of Office 2010 either that worked for more than a week or two. Microsoft has got it down well with its DRM. I hate the DRM and I think Microsoft are idiots in their pricing scheme to the Asian world but it is their choice to be stupid. You need to pay if you use their products. Thank god for GoogleDocs and LibreOffice.

  15. Re:Exactly! This is the "Post PC Era" by lgw · · Score: 2

    Windows dominates desktop PCs, but the era of the PC is ending, and Windows will go the way of NetWare unless Microsoft figures something out. Windows 8 is very tablet oriented, but is that really going to help much? The only thing Windows really has going for it these days is that most people use it, and Winows 8 is going to have to compete on its merits in the tablet world. But I wouldn't write them off: Kinect and Surface show that MS isn't quite out of ideas yet, interface-wise.

    As the corporate world starts making its slow shift to ARM-based boot-from-firmware thin clients, that's really going to put the squeeze on MS's client OS business.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  16. Re:Here it begins.. the FUD by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

    Here it begins, the FUD DRM campaign against Windows 8 and a collective group of people getting their panties in a twist.

    And here comes their knight in shining armor, recoiledsnake, ready to fight the good fight on behalf of defenseless multinational corporations...

    I tease, and that's not to imply that we should stand for lies just because the target is a wealthy corporation, but I do think we need to assume the worst when it comes to corporations. I'm assuming windows 8 is going to be windows 7 but with several added layers of stuff to make sure you're running only authorized copies of windows, office, and any other program. I'm assuming it will have more insulation between you and control of your own computer and will put up more resistance to you assuming control over it. I'm assuming this app store will be designed to put money into MS's pockets that would have otherwise gone to smaller, more creative organizations. I'm assuming all of that until MS proves otherwise. One would be a fool to trust any corporation has your interests at heart.

  17. Re:Exactly! This is the "Post PC Era" by Toonol · · Score: 2

    Windows dominates desktop PCs, but the era of the PC is ending, and Windows will go the way of NetWare

    Flying cars, Fusion, etc.

    The era of the PC is not ending... we're decades away from it ending. There are a wide array of functions that a desktop PC gives you that no mobiles devices will fill. The only change that is happening here is that the PC is no longer the ONLY general-purpose computing device available. The explosive growth of one segment does not mean a different segment needs to die. It's not a zero-sum game; the segments complement each other.

  18. Re:Great, an OS that requires you to be online. by vux984 · · Score: 2

    Hell, it's even in the summary:

    And you should know better than to rely on that.

    I (and possibly many others) interpret this as needing an internet connection to boot Windows, as in booting from their remote server.

    This is why /. readers are often labelled slashtards.

    The reference to a "remote server to push OS code to systems at boot time" refers to the fast net booting technology that microsoft patented... where instead of waiting for a complete system image before booting, the system can begin booting much earlier.

    Its an enterprise targeted enhancement to net booting that makes net booting more usable.

    Its wild speculation crossing the line to complete idiocy to speculate that this net booting capability would be required for all users.

    Think about it for half a second. You wouldn't be able to turn your computer on: on a plane. Or a boat. Or in the mountains. Or when visiting a 3rd world country.

    How many networks aren't attached to the internet or aren't attached reliably? Military, Medical, Testing, Remote research stations...

    How do most hotspots and hotels etc work... you connect to an open network (wired or wireless) but all internet access is blocked and all http access is redirected to a web page to enter in your room number, guest password, whatever... so ALL that infrastructure breaks down too.

    Its simply not going to happen.

  19. Re:Deja Vu by gorzek · · Score: 2

    I have yet to see a hairyfeet post that wasn't hysterical ranting with almost no basis in reality.

  20. Re:Great, an OS that requires you to be online. by marcello_dl · · Score: 2

    He's not a fanboy, he just is not satisfied with the level of security offered by debian and fedora and therefore chose... er... windows.

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol