Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft 'Ribbonizes' Windows 8 File Manager

CWmike writes "Microsoft said today it will 'ribbonize' the file manager in next year's Windows 8, adding Explorer to the short list of integrated applications that already sport the interface in Windows 7. Microsoft's Alex Simons, director of program management, released screenshots of the new ribbon interface planned for Explorer (scroll way down). 'We evaluated several different UI command affordances including expanded versions of the Vista/Windows 7 command bar, Windows 95/Windows XP style toolbars and menus, several entirely new UI approaches, and the Office style ribbon,' explained Simons. 'Of these, the ribbon approach offered benefits in line with our goals.' Plans by Microsoft and others to ribbonize applications have often met resistance. 'We knew that using a ribbon for Explorer would likely be met with skepticism by a set of power users, but there are clear benefits,' Simons said."

9 of 951 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Awful by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Informative

    In this particular case, I suggest you read the blog post first before jumping to conclusion. It has a fairly detailed analysis of most used commands in Explorer, and how they were specifically placed all on the default Ribbon tab so as to be at a single-click distance.

  2. Re:Awful by SpryGuy · · Score: 3, Informative

    If there's something you use frequently that isn't on the home tab, you can just add it to the "Quick Access" bar... a custom list of any of the ribbon commands you want to put there. It's then one click away at all times, period.

    Or you can just lear the key press for it, and use that.

    Really, there's a ton of whining about the Ribbon that I see from people that strikes me as nothing more or less than someone whining about how ignorant they are about the Ribbon or how to use it.

    Most people I've known who "hate" it stop hating it after I sit down with them for five minutes and just show them how to use it and make it work like they want it to. It's really not that tough, and the only reason they didn't figure it out themselves is that they were so dead-set on just HATING it because it wasn't exactly like they were used to.

    --

    - Spryguy
    There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
  3. Re:SUCKAGE! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Informative

    What really pisses me off? They spend their billions and waste their considerable engineering talent (drained from the main pool, where it could be put to so much better use) on piddly, unwanted and irredeemably narcissistic UI frippery, like this irredeemable excrescence.

    But if there's a minor hiccup in an HTTP 1.1 or SMB file transfer on a local network? Sorry. Resume from the beginning.

    If your transfer protocol is so broken? Write some fucking caches, checksums and wrapper proxies on your server and in the Explorer. Fix the shit that really steals hours and days out of any real user's year.

    "We actually have a usability study that shows 1.7 weeks a year are saved in Knowledge Worker productivity, every quarter, by using the ribbon. Here's a great ROI calculator you should shove under your CFO's backside - to convince him that a Windows upgrade actually saves your enterprise money!"

    That's what these losers actually pedal. It's enough to be sick down your shirtfront.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  4. Re:Paging Darth Vader by mcmonkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    The ribbon is an improvement in user interface design, even if you don't personally like it.

    B.S. Even after I learn where the options are on the ribbon. Even after I learn the new short cut keys. Even after I move my most used functions to the quick access toolbar.

    Even after I do all those things, the ribbon still keeps me from doing the thing I'm trying to do. It leaves less room for viewing my email, or my document, or my spreadsheet.

    If I were to bitch that "ctrl-f" in Word is now "ctrl-h", I suppose that could just be complaining about change in general. There's no more effort, no more keystrokes between the two. Perhaps "ctrl-f" is a little more logical because 'Find' beings with 'f', but really, what's the difference?

    But to take away screen space and say I just don't like change? 100% B.S.

    It's like taking a pick-up truck and replacing it with a hatchback. For the folks that need and use the pick-up truck, having issues with the hatchback is not "complaining about change in general."

    I actually need and use my email. As in, I need to see the message body of my email. Having "panes" popping out from every side of the screen with a thick ribbon across the top, leaving room for a few visible lines of message is not an improvement in user interface design.

  5. Re:Great more crap I don't want. by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes I figured you could minimize it. That doesn't help when you need a function accessed through the ribbon. It's like having a drawer full of crap that you have to root through when you need a particular tool, everything looks nice and neat when it's closed but then you need something and the pain starts.

    --
    If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  6. Re:Paging Darth Vader by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hmm...well, now I have a reason to never update to Win 8....geez, I don't know ANYONE that likes the fscking ribbon interface.

    I'm guessing they won't have a 'classic' look and feel option?

    It's astonishing how bad the new microsoft office is. By bad I mean not only hard to use even in simple ways but hard to figure out how to use. It is utterly baffling to long time users. It's not intuitive to new ones.

    I'm not talking about it requiring a little re-learning. I've tried. I put effort into it. I can't figure the fucking thing out. My pasted graphics get wrapped in these shit sandwich wrappers that defy manipulation.

    I've just punted and bought a copy of Apple's Page.app. Now I just export and import into that. if there's a functionality I lack I'd rather not have it than be forced to use the Ribbon of doom.

    That said, given a choice, I'd use MS word for compatibility reasons if it just had the old interface. I'd pay extra to have the old interface back.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  7. Re:Awful by SpryGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Um... yes, it tells you exactly what the short cut keys are.

    Hold down the alt key. Now look at the ribbon. It shows you exactly what keys to hit in order to get the function you want. You can switch tabs and hit any control with a keypress, and it hand-holds you all the way through.

    How can you have been using this months or years without knowing this? I'm not sure. It's right there before your eyes, and works very similarly to how the old system did it, with Alt key highlighting (via underline) the hot key to press, or activating the menu control. It's not like it's a completely foreign concept.

    So, your "main complaint" is completely without merit. What's your next complaint? Perhaps I can help you out there too.

    --

    - Spryguy
    There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
  8. Re:Paging Darth Vader by Lokitoth · · Score: 4, Informative

    Given that the ribbon replaces the menu and toolbars in Office, and the TopBar/BottomBar in explorer, you are not actually losing vertical real-estate. If you had at least three rows of toolbar in Outlook, you would actually be gaining a few pixels in the transition to ribbon. Moreover, since you can collapse the ribbon to the height of the menubar, I am not entirely sure where the real loss of space is.

  9. Re:Paging Darth Vader by Kopiok · · Score: 3, Informative

    Pressing 'alt' shows all the keyboard shortcuts (for the items shown) and walks you through selecting them.