Slashdot Mirror


Measles Resurgent Due To Fear of Vaccination

florescent_beige writes "In the September Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Gregory Poland, M.D. writes that 'More than 150 cases of measles have been reported in the United States already this year and there have been similar outbreaks in Europe, a sign the disease is making an alarming comeback (abstract). The reappearance of the potentially deadly virus is the result of unfounded fears about a link between the measles shot and autism that have turned some parents against childhood vaccination.'" This follows the recent release of a massive review of studies into the side effects of vaccination, summarized here by Nature, which did not find convincing support for the idea that MMR shots caused autism.

25 of 668 comments (clear)

  1. It's a shame... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unfortunately, it's not only those who refuse vaccination that end up at risk.

    1. Re:It's a shame... by uncanny · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really, the ones who refused the vaccinations probably got vaccinated when they were kids. But they are making the decision to put their kids lives at risk

    2. Re:It's a shame... by rednip · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People people who get in car accidents sometimes die in spite of wearing seat belts, maybe you should stop wearing yours.

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    3. Re:It's a shame... by TheEyes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, the people most at risk are those who cannot be vaccinated: the very young, and those with weak immune systems. If not for them, I wouldn't care about this sort of thing; for those who choose to ignore science and lose their children to easily preventable disease it's nothing more than Darwinism at work, but it's a tragedy when people die because their neighbors are fools.

    4. Re:It's a shame... by Kagetsuki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, it just helped the stupid ones survive. Science has killed natural selection.

    5. Re:It's a shame... by Beelzebud · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People like you are a bigger drag on human progress than an army of those with "poor stock"...

    6. Re:It's a shame... by digitrev · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't understand the idea of natural selection, do you?

      I'm going to take some liberties with the science here (I'm a physicist, not a biologist), but the gist of it is simple. Humans have been "selected" for large brains. Basically, various evolutionary pressures favoured larger and larger brains in certain situations, which led to the human brain. These brains are capable of a great number of things, including the sciences that lead to vaccination.

      Natural selection doesn't mean what nature does in absence of humanity, it means those that survive to reproduce get their genes passed along. It's a long term statistical process, that doesn't care what the pressures or responses are, only that you survive long enough to reproduce and keep your kids alive.

      Besides, where did we get this idea that there's any difference between "natural" and "artificial" life? This comic sums it up quite well, in my opinion.

      --
      Cynical Idealist
    7. Re:It's a shame... by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just another eugenicist. They were the Libertarians of yesteryear, selfish and wicked.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:It's a shame... by digitrev · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fine, but I'll bet your calculation depended a lot on herd immunity. If enough people stopped getting the vaccination, the risk for dying from measles jumps right the hell up. Just like we're seeing here. I applaud you for doing the math, but consider the fact that when the immunization rate drops too low, measles could come back huge. And people will die in droves, just to remind us that vaccines are good. Please, consider getting your son vaccinated against measles anyways.

      --
      Cynical Idealist
    9. Re:It's a shame... by digitrev · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Joke or not, I get sick of hearing that line. Natural selection just means slow statistical process of change caused by evolutionary pressures that ultimately lead to what we are now. I mean, we don't consider birds flying to be unnatural? They evolved to fly. We evolved to create vaccines.

      --
      Cynical Idealist
    10. Re:It's a shame... by LordLucless · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except - in the developed world at least - there just aren't many evolutionary pressures any more. Modern medicine can help carriers of almost any gene survive to procreate, and with in vitro fertilisation and suchlike, you don't even need to necessarily be attractive to pass them on. Evolution is an adaptive mechanism, not some endless process churning out more and more advanced forms of life. When there's drastic environmental changes (evolutionary pressures) you get rapid evolution, as problematic traits are ruthlessly selected against. When a species is already well-adapated to its environment, you get evolutionary stability.

      Look at the people who die before child-bearing age: http://www.statisticstop10.com/Causes_of_Death_Kids.html . Accidental deaths and homicides account for around 45% of deaths before child bearing age. Unless we're adapting to being stab-resistant, or able to survive collision at 100km/hr, we're not really moving anywhere.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    11. Re:It's a shame... by slimjim8094 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you're not trolling, you're an asshole. The very notion of society is that we can all pitch in for the common interest, for everybody's benefit. And the only mandatory vaccines are those for school children - because schools are the very places in which one might contract measles.

      I am sickened by you in particular, and sad for humanity in general, because there are so many people like you that are terrified that somebody, somewhere might benefit from your actions - even if they aren't outwardly altruistic. It's a sort of militant selfishness, or perhaps overly zealous spite, that I literally can't comprehend. Especially when the "benefit" in this case is some poor kid not dying

      Fuck you.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    12. Re:It's a shame... by Duradin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have you ruled out a hereditary disposition towards autism? I'd stop having kids and do that before putting others at risk.

  2. An episode of Penn & Teller's Bullshit says it by lattyware · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An episode of Penn & Teller's Bullshit says it, and says it well. Even presuming the cases of vacination causing autism were not bullshit, it'd still be worse to not vaccinate all our kids - more would end up dead than would end up autistic.

    Of course, people don't see it that way, they just like their knee-jerk responses. I literally can not believe that people actually still refer to something so discredited. People need to spend 5 seconds doing some goddamn research on an issue - and not just looking for things to confirm what they think.

    I blame the rise of the schooling system going all 'no opinion can be wrong' - it's such obvious crap, and yet people seem to believe it. I can say it's my opinion the sky is blue all day long, it doesn't make it true. Sure, some opinions - ones of taste, can not be wrong, as they are something inherant to you, but too many parents, when you try and explain that there is no reason to fear vaccinations, will just refuse to listen, tell you to stop 'telling them what to do with their children' and it's 'their opinion' that the vaccines are bad. It's such rubbish. Not only that, but people have somehow managed to grow up seeing all discussion as someone else trying to force you onto their side. The point of discussion is to try and see where the differences in your opinion are - if the other person can convince you that you are wrong, that's excellent - you have just gained something. Likewise if you can show them. Instead, people just refuse to listen to the other side of an argument.

    People need to learn that being wrong isn't something bad - and that you sure as hell do not have a right to never be wrong. I get it, these parents want to look after their kids - and who can blame them for that? What I can blame them for is not actually caring enough to check what is actually good for them.

    --
    -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
  3. It's like a religion by Constantin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    .... there are risks associated with any medical procedure, including vaccinations. But vaccinations are among the safest things one can do for oneself and the community. The benefits far outweigh the risks, the science is clear on that. Most of the folk that oppose vaccinations do so out of unfounded fears, i.e. gut reactions, not rational reflection of the facts. Instead, they are swayed by the likes of Ms. McCarthy or Mr. Wakefield that there is some sort of giant medical conspiracy. It is precisely this sort of ignorance why more diseases like polio have not gone the way of smallpox, i.e. been eradicated in the wild. In the case of polio, it's thanks to nutty preachers in the affected remaining hotspots making similarly dreary claims re: the polio vaccine.

    I attribute the willingness of parents to take a chance with herd immunity to the fact that they haven't themselves seen the effects of polio, whooping cough, etc. in the community around them. There is a reason that in years past people gladly lined up for polio vaccinations - they'd seen the impact, could better trade off the miniscule risk (especially with the post-Cutter-incident monitoring) with the benefits of not having dead, disfigured, or severely disabled children. Indeed, one of the biggest impacts of vaccination programs is the serious reduction in schools for the deaf, dumb, and blind.

    Ironically, having rejected comparatively perfectly safe vaccination options, parents seem to have no issues with then putting all the interventionist methods to use to save their children if they do fall sick. I.e. take them to the hospital, operate, perform lots of heroic work to save the child... all of which would not have been necessary if they hadn't blindly followed quacks advice re: vaccinations. And that's what amazes me, the quacks of the world who promote anti-vaccination messages have yet to prove any causal link between MMR and/or thimerosal with autism, yet they stick to this piece of faith, not unlike the folk who will follow cult religions. It's pity for the kids, they have no one looking out for their interests.

    Last but not least, what bothers me most about refusing vaccinations is that there will always be some members of the community that have to rely on herd immunity because their own immune systems are not fully functional, they are undergoing immuno-suppressing therapy, or they are allergic to some of the proteins inherent in the current manufacturing processes for most vaccines. Additionally, no vaccine is 100% effective - so depending on the ability of the virus or bacteria to spread through the community, a very high immunization rate is required to protect everyone in the herd, immunized or not.

    I hope that some day the likes of Ms. McCarthy or Mr. Wakefield will own up to their hubris, character assassination, innuendo, etc. and apologize to the world not only for disrupting one of the most successful medical programs of our times, but also for killing, disfiguring, and traumatizing gaggles of children needlessly with their panic-mongering. This is not unlike shouting "Fire" in a crowded theatre - especially in the case of Mr. Wakefield where key aspects of his 'research' were later found to be faked, massive conflicts of interest were not disclosed, and interpretations were drawn without the benefit of facts.

    For anyone interested in the subject, I highly recommend the books written by Dr. Offit on the matter, especially "Autisms False Prophets", and "Deadly Choices". He details the characters of the anti-vaccination movements quite nicely and shows in reference after reference what the real impacts of vaccine refusal are.

  4. Re:An episode of Penn & Teller's Bullshit says by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People need to spend 5 seconds doing some goddamn research on an issue

    You're asking too much here.

    A lot of people just can't understand the result of their search, or won't realize they should do such a search, or cannot sort through the quantity of information available (lots of dross, even in good science). They need to be told, clearly and unequivocally, what's the recommended thing to do in issues involving science/medicine/etc. Any imbecile who publicly tells them to do demonstrably harmful things should be taken to task, and held culpable to the extent which can be justified.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  5. Re:Gonna get flamed by Metiu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe you remember measles parties, but not the measles wards in hospitals, where people with their brain smashed by encephalitis were kept. In that case, maybe you would have gotten a better picture. Kids also were dying more frequently in the past, and that was not as big an issue as today, because it was not avoidable at best and anyway there were many more kids per family than today.

    I was vaccinated (my choice at 18) and survived an infection. I lived with people with measles and was ok all the time. I don't see having the virus spreading to my lungs, eyes, skin and brain as a better option. And I've seen the effects, you don't want to try them.

  6. Please, learn statistics before posting BS by mangu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    depending on where and how you live the measles vaccine still can have a higher chance of serious to deadly outcome as apposed to the chance of getting measles and having a serious to deadly outcome

    Doh... That's because people in those areas are vaccinated!

    Having a pediatrician that's used to servicing hacidic(sp) Jews helps as they can have religious issues with vaccines.

    This is a clear cut case. Public health trumps religious issues, hasidic Jews children should be vaccinated against their parents dogmas.

    1. Re:Please, learn statistics before posting BS by Opportunist · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Pretty much anything trumps religious issues. Reality trumps dreamland in every case I could imagine.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Please, learn statistics before posting BS by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      children should be vaccinated against their parents dogmas

      Education is the only known vaccine against dogma, unfortunately most victims catch it from their parents before they get to school age.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  7. Re:An episode of Penn & Teller's Bullshit says by lattyware · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Obviously I didn't mean a literal 5 seconds. Yes, reasearch takes up parent's already valuable time. So what - that's a responsibility of parenting, if you care, you can make time. Yeah, it hard - but that is parenting. You have to make a choice the child can not.

    As to Penn and Teller, they are not missing the point - they knew that argument doesn't apply to the individual child - it doesn't make it less valid.

    --
    -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
  8. Re:An episode of Penn & Teller's Bullshit says by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I advocate yanking their kids out of school. No vaccination, by choice? Get the hell away from my kids. Herd immunity can probably take care of the vanishingly small number of kids who can't have the vaccine for whatever medical reason.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  9. Re:Gonna get flamed by darkmeridian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hate the knee jerk reaction that somehow Big Pharma is pushing vaccinations on the unwashed masses with help from the government. Most vaccinations are unprofitable especially with the risk of adverse events factored in. Companies would much rather you get sick and need treatment because a one-time shot doesn't make a lot of money. In fact, the government has to specifically create a liability fund to get companies to make vaccines for public use.

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  10. goddamn baby boomers ruin everything! by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The greatest generation were tough as leather with great big balls of steel, because they hadn't invented titanium yet. The eventually got off their asses and smashed the Nazis, rebuilt the world from the ashes of global war, made said Nazis put a man on the moon for us and ground communism into dust.

    Fuckin' boomers, drained out social safety nets by refusing to adjust to demographic realities, lost two wars to a bunch of rice-eaters, ruined the economy repeatedly, shut down useful investment for future generations, turned their back on our manifest destiny to conquer space, engendered an society where entertainers are ludicrously compensated while teachers are vilified for taking crumbs from the mouths of millionaires and started the slide into a new dark ages by embracing ideology over facts and science.

    The baby boomer generation is the greatest generation's GREATEST FAILURE.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  11. Re:An episode of Penn & Teller's Bullshit says by Jason+Levine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think one of the problems is that vaccinations are *too* successful. Parents today (and that includes me and my wife) have never seen the ravages of Measles, Whooping Cough, Polio and the like. We have it easy because we were vaccinated when we were young. Then someone claims vaccines cause bad, scary things which plants doubt in their minds so they do a risk evaluation in their head. They know autism is bad. They probably have seen someone with autism. They have probably never seen someone with measles or whooping cough, though. Their brain tries to come up with a "bad disease" and they think of the flu. So would a lifetime of autism be worse than a week of fever and coughing? Sure. So skip the vaccines.

    Problem is that their risk assessment is highly flawed. If they knew the real risks of the diseases, they'd know that this isn't "fever and coughing for a week" but coughing until you get broken ribs, hospitalization, paralysis, blindness, and death (to name a few things the diseases can cause). And these are far more common than any hypothetical vaccine-autism link. I'd much rather have my child turn out to be autistic than turn out to be dead. (As my younger son goes in for 2 vaccines today.)

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.