Slashdot Mirror


Measles Resurgent Due To Fear of Vaccination

florescent_beige writes "In the September Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Gregory Poland, M.D. writes that 'More than 150 cases of measles have been reported in the United States already this year and there have been similar outbreaks in Europe, a sign the disease is making an alarming comeback (abstract). The reappearance of the potentially deadly virus is the result of unfounded fears about a link between the measles shot and autism that have turned some parents against childhood vaccination.'" This follows the recent release of a massive review of studies into the side effects of vaccination, summarized here by Nature, which did not find convincing support for the idea that MMR shots caused autism.

21 of 668 comments (clear)

  1. It's a shame... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unfortunately, it's not only those who refuse vaccination that end up at risk.

    1. Re:It's a shame... by uncanny · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really, the ones who refused the vaccinations probably got vaccinated when they were kids. But they are making the decision to put their kids lives at risk

    2. Re:It's a shame... by digitrev · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah. My friend's brother has an allergy to the vaccine, and his health relies on herd immunity. When idiots like these (and my one uncle; I don't really talk to him anymore) refuse to vaccinate their kids, my friend's brother is the one most likely to get hurt by this.

      --
      Cynical Idealist
    3. Re:It's a shame... by digitrev · · Score: 5, Informative

      Because vaccination does not guarantee immunity. Sometimes the vaccinations don't take hold immediately. For example, my fiancee had to get at least 3 Hep B vaccinations because her body didn't react properly the first few times. Or some people have a weakened immune system, and can't produce the antigens. Or what about people who would love to get vaccinated, but can't, because of an allergy to the vaccine? All of those people, and many others, rely heavily on what's called herd immunity.

      Herd immunity relies on a sufficent percentage of the population being vaccinated. That way, there are no vectors to people without the immunity. You can't get sick if you don't encounter the bacteria, and if everyone you meet is vaccinated, then you'll never get sick.

      However, if someone isn't vaccinated, but is strong enough to fight it off, they could pass it to you. And if you have a weak immune system, that can lead to severe short and long term consequences.

      --
      Cynical Idealist
    4. Re:It's a shame... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

      So you're saying the vaccine makes people stupid?

    5. Re:It's a shame... by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

      Science has killed natural selection.

      That's natural selection's fault. It should have adapted.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:It's a shame... by tbannist · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is shocking how stupid some people can be.

      The vaccine isn't 100% effective, there are very few things which are. According to the National Network for Immunization Information one vaccination is 95% and two is 99.7% effective. The U.S. started giving 2 shots in 1989. That probably means there are between 10 and 15 million people in the U.S. who received the vaccine who are still vulnerable to Measles.

      Now, I do have a degree in Mathematics so you can take my word on the fact that a 0.3% is much less than 100%. There is a 0.01% of a child having a reaction, and a 0.00001% of a child having a severe reaction, and 0.000001% of a child having an anaphylactic reaction. No children have died as a result of the vaccine in the United States since 1990. Before vaccination started (in the 1960s), 450 people died annually from measles and another 4000 got encephaltis. Again, I give you my assurance that 0 is much less than 9000.

      The risks of just one disease the MMR vaccine protects against far greater and more severe than the risks of the vaccine.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    7. Re:It's a shame... by slimjim8094 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you're not trolling, you're an asshole. The very notion of society is that we can all pitch in for the common interest, for everybody's benefit. And the only mandatory vaccines are those for school children - because schools are the very places in which one might contract measles.

      I am sickened by you in particular, and sad for humanity in general, because there are so many people like you that are terrified that somebody, somewhere might benefit from your actions - even if they aren't outwardly altruistic. It's a sort of militant selfishness, or perhaps overly zealous spite, that I literally can't comprehend. Especially when the "benefit" in this case is some poor kid not dying

      Fuck you.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    8. Re:It's a shame... by RingDev · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Evolution is an adaptive mechanism, not some endless process churning out more and more advanced forms of life.

      Kinda, it is. Evolution is the change over time of propagation of mutations.

      Last year there was a study published on a 40 year old strain of bacteria. What they had found was for the first x years, as mutations occured they did so at a rather consistent rate, and the population 'evolved'. Some mutations propagated, some were out compeated, and so on just as we've come to expect.

      But after that first number of years, there were no more changes to the environment, but the mutations continued at a very similar rate. What they found though was that at that point, with no other pressures on the population, that the % of the mutations that lead to improved survival/proginy dropped significantly. There were still lots of mutations, they just weren't leading to any further evolution.

      The organizms had advanced to the point that most negative trait mutations did not effect them significantly enough to prevent their growth rate, and that positive trait mutations did not give them enough of an advantage to out-compete other organizms.

      That isn't to say that some other mutation won't occur to greatly improve their survivability, or that introducing some new stimulus wouldn't lead to a new branch of evolution. But there is a point where evolutionary pressure deminishes while the mutation rate remains.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  2. Jenny McArthy by Mike+Mentalist · · Score: 5, Funny

    Stick to getting to your tits out please and leave the science to the ugly people.

    Cheers.

    --
    I put my books on Amazon, Smashwords, Demonoid, ISOHunt and Pirate Bay. Search for 'Michael Cargill'
  3. In a cruel twist of irony... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The MMR vaccine has not shown signs of causing neurological problems; but Measles, in the not-as-rare-as-one-might-like cases where it progresses to include Encephalitis, certainly has...

  4. Please, please, get that shot! by Metiu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This year my wife mysteriously got measles (in Italy). She hadn't been vaccinated because when we were young the vaccine was not available. BUT our youngest child got it, too, because he was at the time younger than the age at which you get the shot.

    I don't tell you the trouble of having a diagnosis, since the disease is so uncommon today, that after two visits, my wife finally diagnosed it herself on wikipedia (sic). And the trouble of telling all the authorities, which needed to find the lost protocols for such an infection.

    To sum it up: the studies linking the shot with autism were done by an UK professor, who has been on trial for telling false results to help his own company.
    When you don't get the shot and you are healthy, you're just selfishly exploiting the fact that most of "other people" will get the shot and you will be protected. BUT measles IS dangerous, and some people won't have your choice, because they are too young or too unhealthy to get that shot. They will risk severe damages by the disease, so PLEASE don't be a wimp and kindly get vaccinated.

  5. An episode of Penn & Teller's Bullshit says it by lattyware · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An episode of Penn & Teller's Bullshit says it, and says it well. Even presuming the cases of vacination causing autism were not bullshit, it'd still be worse to not vaccinate all our kids - more would end up dead than would end up autistic.

    Of course, people don't see it that way, they just like their knee-jerk responses. I literally can not believe that people actually still refer to something so discredited. People need to spend 5 seconds doing some goddamn research on an issue - and not just looking for things to confirm what they think.

    I blame the rise of the schooling system going all 'no opinion can be wrong' - it's such obvious crap, and yet people seem to believe it. I can say it's my opinion the sky is blue all day long, it doesn't make it true. Sure, some opinions - ones of taste, can not be wrong, as they are something inherant to you, but too many parents, when you try and explain that there is no reason to fear vaccinations, will just refuse to listen, tell you to stop 'telling them what to do with their children' and it's 'their opinion' that the vaccines are bad. It's such rubbish. Not only that, but people have somehow managed to grow up seeing all discussion as someone else trying to force you onto their side. The point of discussion is to try and see where the differences in your opinion are - if the other person can convince you that you are wrong, that's excellent - you have just gained something. Likewise if you can show them. Instead, people just refuse to listen to the other side of an argument.

    People need to learn that being wrong isn't something bad - and that you sure as hell do not have a right to never be wrong. I get it, these parents want to look after their kids - and who can blame them for that? What I can blame them for is not actually caring enough to check what is actually good for them.

    --
    -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
  6. Re:What percentage of those infected... by LordLimecat · · Score: 5, Informative

    Im not sure theres ever as clear as a correlation as this:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Measles_US_1944-2007_inset.png

    I mean, there doesnt even seem to be a shadow of a doubt that the shots are effective, whatever other complaints you might want to make about them.

  7. Re:Gonna get flamed by Metiu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe you remember measles parties, but not the measles wards in hospitals, where people with their brain smashed by encephalitis were kept. In that case, maybe you would have gotten a better picture. Kids also were dying more frequently in the past, and that was not as big an issue as today, because it was not avoidable at best and anyway there were many more kids per family than today.

    I was vaccinated (my choice at 18) and survived an infection. I lived with people with measles and was ok all the time. I don't see having the virus spreading to my lungs, eyes, skin and brain as a better option. And I've seen the effects, you don't want to try them.

  8. Re:Gonna get flamed by BeardedChimp · · Score: 5, Informative
    By putting out mis-information like this you are part of the reason for the large number of deaths from measels. From the WHO.

    • Measles is one of the leading causes of death among young children even though a safe and cost-effective vaccine is available.
    • In 2008, there were 164 000 measles deaths globally – nearly 450 deaths every day or 18 deaths every hour.
    • More than 95% of measles deaths occur in low-income countries with weak health infrastructures.
    • Measles vaccination resulted in a 78% drop in measles deaths between 2000 and 2008 worldwide.
    • In 2008, about 83% of the world's children received one dose of measles vaccine by their first birthday through routine health services – up from 72% in 2000.

    You clearly did not read the nature article as this is in no way a strawman. They did not just look at the relation between vaccines and MMR, but about negative effects of vaccines.

    They found

    We looked very hard and found very little evidence of serious adverse harms from vaccines

    Stop putting out your own knee-jerk reactions and at least read the article you are criticising before putting out dangerous misinformation.

  9. Relying on everyone *else* vaccinating *their* kid by rkhalloran · · Score: 5, Informative

    The situation you describe is reliance on "herd immunity": if enough of the population is vaccinated that *your* exposure risk is negligible, then yes, there's a slightly higher risk of harm from the actual vaccine than the disease, because there's little-to-no chance of anyone around you can infect you with the disease.

    The situation *now* is that because so many families have skipped the vaccinations because of the Andrew Wakefields and Jenny McCarthy's of the world raising fears of vaccine-triggered autism that the situation is now reversed: enough of the population around you have *voluntarily* skipped the immunization that you're at greater risk of the disease.

    Ye fscking godz: I'm enough of a geez to remember the days of closed pools and iron lungs because of polio risk. The idea that a parent would *voluntarily* put their kid at risk for diseases because of some talking head on the TV infuriates me.

  10. Re:Gonna get flamed by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Informative

    So you're arguing not to use soap?

    The fact is that vaccination programs have been, by any measure, among the most successful public health initiatives ever. Illnesses like polio, measles and smallpox caused untold misery and death, and were major contributors to infant and child mortality rates (which were huge before the end of the 19th century). People today, living in the comfort provided by over a century of public vaccination programs, simply do not understand this. And this garbage about vaccines causing allergies, or whatever it is you're trying to say, even if it were so, would still not be an argument vaccinations. Vaccines, like all medical procedures, carry inherent risks, but the benefits of wide-scale vaccination programs is so large that it outweighs what ultimately are a few relatively infrequent serious side-effects.

    Oh, and your whole post reads like yet another idiot who comes up with a pet theory while drinking beers in the backyard with his friends. "Say, y'know Tom, I bet that MMR causes allergies. Little Billy got the MMR vaccine, and now he sneezes all the time."

    Look up the cum hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  11. Re:Gonna get flamed by darkmeridian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hate the knee jerk reaction that somehow Big Pharma is pushing vaccinations on the unwashed masses with help from the government. Most vaccinations are unprofitable especially with the risk of adverse events factored in. Companies would much rather you get sick and need treatment because a one-time shot doesn't make a lot of money. In fact, the government has to specifically create a liability fund to get companies to make vaccines for public use.

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  12. Re:An episode of Penn & Teller's Bullshit says by Jason+Levine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think one of the problems is that vaccinations are *too* successful. Parents today (and that includes me and my wife) have never seen the ravages of Measles, Whooping Cough, Polio and the like. We have it easy because we were vaccinated when we were young. Then someone claims vaccines cause bad, scary things which plants doubt in their minds so they do a risk evaluation in their head. They know autism is bad. They probably have seen someone with autism. They have probably never seen someone with measles or whooping cough, though. Their brain tries to come up with a "bad disease" and they think of the flu. So would a lifetime of autism be worse than a week of fever and coughing? Sure. So skip the vaccines.

    Problem is that their risk assessment is highly flawed. If they knew the real risks of the diseases, they'd know that this isn't "fever and coughing for a week" but coughing until you get broken ribs, hospitalization, paralysis, blindness, and death (to name a few things the diseases can cause). And these are far more common than any hypothetical vaccine-autism link. I'd much rather have my child turn out to be autistic than turn out to be dead. (As my younger son goes in for 2 vaccines today.)

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  13. Measles is no big deal? Bullshit. by overshoot · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't see why there's such a big screaming panic about a disease that gives you spots and a bit of a temperature, and a couple of days off school...

    Because for about two per thousand cases, it causes meningitis which kills about half of the affected patients, leaving many of the survivors brain damaged for life. For quite a few who don't get meningitis, it causes blindness and deafness (measles was the #1 cause of both in the 50s.) Because it causes pneumonia of the "hospitalized for days" variety in up to 30% of cases (and before oxygen therapy, IV fluids, and antibiotics killed about 10% of patients.)

    I had measles before there were vaccines for it. All I have to do is mention measles to get my mother worked up -- she remembers spending a couple of weeks terrified for me, because she grew up before those treatments and even in a small town in rural Illinois she knew families who had children die of it and others who were handicapped for life.

    Talk to people from India about measles, or any of the other vaccine-preventable diseases. You won't find any of them who will tell you those diseases are no big deal, because they know them. In the USA, we've mostly forgotten how bad they are. Thanks to vaccines.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."